Durocher basically promotes Nordicism while at the same time stating that he is not doing so – shades of Arthur Kemp. So, essentially, Durocher promotes: mainstreaming, HBD, and Nordicism (*). On top of it, he produces sentences that are double lies:
The existential prospects for eastern and southern European nations, not forgetting Argentina, are infinitely brighter.
Southern and Eastern European nations have among the lowest birthrates in Europe, and, indeed, the world. Some of them, especially Italy, Spain, and Greece, are being flooded with migrants. Russia is demographically becoming Asian and Muslim. Certain Central European and Balkan nations are seeing their native populations being demographically swamped by fast-breeding Roma. They are as “cucked” as anyone else and they are a bit behind in the dispossession rates only because of their – as Durocher informs us – socioeconomic inferiority compared to the NW, which has heretofore made them less attractive destinations for migrants. Durocher’s outright lie of infinitely better prospects is another fetishist misconception of a “demographically secure Southern and Eastern Europe” (a specialty of “Desmond Jones” for example) is yet more evidence that Durocher is intentionally spreading some of the worst lies of HBDers and Nordicists.
This absolute scum Durocher has to be the worst filth in the “movement,” and his activities are being very carefully watched….and remembered. And, truth be told, I do not understand why otherwise intelligent and well-meaning activists persist in giving the liar Durocher a forum to spread his mendacious trash.
Durocher says we should follow the truth wherever it leads us. I agree. The truth: Durocher is a vicious enemy of European Man, he is a fifth column within the “movement,” he is the traitor within the gates, and the preceding paragraph well summarizes my views on this truth.
Speaking of racial truths, there are of course very real differences between European stocks, these are discussed at my blogs, and I do not hesitate to note the obvious fact that, currently, NW Europeans and their societies exhibit a superior degree of accomplishment in many important metrics of human progress.
However, one can objectively discuss these points without, as Durocher does, OPENLY LYING, spreading silly HBD memes, and promoting political Nordicism while smarmily claiming the opposite (**).
*As an example of Durocherite promotion of HBDite Nordicism, some excerpts:
The relationship between northwest Europeans and other Europeans in some respects parallels that between Europeans and non-Europeans: There is often pronounced envy for the Northwest Europeans’ perceived success, often seesawing between imperfect imitation and nativist self-assertion…
…Italy, with a prosperous northern part of the country and an underperforming south, is much the same. The Italians adhere to the European Union as a way of achieving a northern European quality of life and civility. Italian participation in the Eurozone was, quite explicitly, predicated on a desire to abandon the undisciplined chaos of Italian parliamentary politics…One could say the same thing of Spain, Portugal, Greece, and indeed most of the Balkans, such as Romania and Bulgaria. In each case, the nation’s economics are mediocre and her politics and society are variably corrupt…
…The speculation of many human biodiversity scholars about the so-called “Hajnal line” often smacks as a euphemism, conscious or not, of Nordicism. Speaking of which, the quite obvious genetic cluster formed by northwest European nations just happens to largely coincide with the outlines of the Hajnal line.
All this fits rather neatly with the traditional thesis….
**One can ask what is the purpose of this Durocher piece? Not to tell the truth, as it is full of lies and inaccuracies (some of which are discussed above). Using the same “game” language Durocher is fond of, I’ll say that he is “butt hurt” over the criticisms of him, mainstreaming, and Orban coming from certain directions, and he thinks that nonsense like his essay is “getting even.” If that is true, and I believe it is, he is damaging racial nationalism, and promoting division, just to “score points” as part of a juvenile feud, because he is unable to directly address the mainstreaming issue, which is the major point of contention. So, this childish amateur, a troll who twists and turns to placate the “movement” (note how he puts together rambling articles on Jews for TOO), sacrifices White interests on the altar of his own ego.
People think Roosh is bad? Durocher is 1000x worse.