Not a happy penguin. Well, look, those six figure incomes have to come rolling in, after all.
Should Trump restrict his Secret Service protection to White men only? Is there is clear, factual evidence for immediately distrusting other demographics?
I note that Roissy states that future immigration to America (after a “time out”) should be essentially restricted to “AngloGermanics.” Actually, my view is somewhat similar; as I’ve written before, any (small amount of) immigration to America should be restricted to (indigenous) Europeans and should reinforce the founding stock and associated groups, with other Europeans allowed proportional to current population. Thus: British Isles populations > other Northwest Europeans > Italians > Poles > other Southern and Eastern Europeans. Those admitted should be English-speaking high achievers.
The ironic nature of Roissy’s opinion comes from his other “interests.” His comical (and sexually ambiguous) worship of Trump is contrasted to his desire to restrict (future) immigration to those peoples who, outside of the South, markedly rejected Der Touchback during the GOP primaries. Then, Roissy is a confirmed, self-admitted race-mixer, with a fondness for Negro females with “asses that defy gravity.” Thus, one would expect that he would favor Congoid immigration, so as to increase the stock of the Congoid females he can choose from as he “sits poolside.” But, anyway, yes, AngloGermanics, particularly Anglos, should have immigration preference to the nation that they founded. We can do without the gravity-defying Negro females however. Roissy can move to Africa or the West Indies if he prefers the Negro female. To each his own, as they say.