For British Asians in the Brexit environment, our lives and our property are bound up with the fortunes and the flag of Great Britain, so it is only natural that we would stand with Britain against any and all opponents.
“British Asians” is an oxymoron. “British” properly describes the native peoples of the British Isles (the English, Scots, Scots-Irish, and Welsh) and their cultures. It does NOT describe Asian invaders, alien colonizers, the ones who are helping to displace the native British peoples and who were responsible for the horrors of Rotherham and other sex-grooming scandals in the UK (mostly Pakistani South Asians). The whole point of White nationalism is White nations for Whites, British nationalism is Britain for the British, English nationalism is England for the English. A Britain in which Asians wrap themselves in the “British flag” (cucked civic nationalism) – a mere symbol – to justify their continued presence in someone else’s homeland is not a Britain that reflects ethnonationalist or racial nationalist values. That is multiracial, multicultural diversity – the very thing Majority Rights was created to oppose. Indeed, by normalizing the idea of “British Asians” MR supports the globalist idea of a multiracial Britain and it is morally responsible for Rotherham.
And as far as GW goes, I just don’t understand how an English patriot and nationalist, who created Majority Rights to oppose White dispossession and as a reaction to the Asiatic arrogance of GNXP, can blithely accept arrogant Asians who think they have the right to colonize his homeland. Instead of objecting to “British Asians” he instead writes how “entertaining” the British Asian post is, and of course, chuckling at insults hurled in my direction. I’d tread carefully if I were him. GW lies in stating what my interests and preferences are. I don’t even believe “Mediterranean” is a valid biocultural concept, so I don’t know what he’s gibbering about there. Hey, GW I say one thing to you – first, consider your blog as it was, say, in 2005-2007, with the people and posts back then, and now take a look at the “creative destruction” present now. I’m gone, you drove Bowery away (the details of which you probably think I forgot, but I did not – suffice to say that I remember very well your response when I contacted you in private and told you that your blog’s treatment of Bowery was despicable and that he deserved better from you), Phil what’s his name is long gone, Beck is gone, where’s Zeka, where’s all those people (Regardless of what I thought of their ideology. For example, I’ve had my disagreements with Bowery in the past, but I believe that he’s an honorable man who is dealing with things now with dignity and the way you casually tossed him away as a valued blogger demonstrates your piss-poor character). You should be ashamed of yourself. Now your site consists of your endless and boring debates about “white leftism” or Kumiko’s self-interested Asian colonization or Danny’s ranting and the comments section consists mostly of the aforementioned stupidities, sprinkled by Chaos’ “lulzing” and Danny posting comments under descriptive names, basically padding his own posts with his own comments. Creative destruction, indeed.
As far as the rest of the Kumiko-Danny tag team, I’m not going to waste my time arguing all of their lies. Let’s just take one example to demonstrate how shockingly dishonest they are. Kumiko, again, tries to deny that Daniel wanted Asian colonies, including Asian military, in White nations. East Africa, my ass. These are his own words, emphasis added for reading comprehension addled Oriental retards:
Sacrosanct European territories in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand will likely need to become smaller at any rate in order to be maintained and defended. But with the increased manageability of defense will come an opportunity to offer cooperation to Asians to have some sacrosanct territories of their own in these places.
We already have Chinatowns. Now there could be some intermittently disbursed along the borders of the Mediterranean and among European cities with border and migrant control an explicit part of their mandate.
Paragraph one: offering Asians to have “sacrosanct territories of their own in these places.” What places? Err…Danny had just mentioned “Sacrosanct European territories in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand” so he means Asian colonies in “the Americas, Australia and New Zealand.”
Paragraph two: Danny talks about that “we already have Chinatowns.” Then he proceeds to say that there could be “some intermittently disbursed along the borders of the Mediterranean and among European cities with border and migrant control an explicit part of their mandate.” Again, it is clear, STOP LYING. He openly and very clearly states having Chinese colonies – akin to “Chinatowns” – “intermittently disbursed along the borders of the Mediterranean and among European cities” in order to enforce “border and migrant control”- and shows black booted Chinese girls with guns (*) as an example of such a force.
That you cannot admit what’s clear in black and white – that you are so cowardly and stupid that you folks can’t even take ownership of a comment you left at your own blog demonstrates that you are so fundamentally dishonest that there’s no point dealing with your insane gibbering any more.
But I ask: if I’m so much of a Jew-inspired enemy, why do you keep my EGI post at your godforsaken blog. I’ve lost count how many times I’ve asked it to be taken down – privately to GW multiple times (do I need to dig up all those old emails?), more recently over the last several months. Another indication of what low character trash you people are.
*I showed that comment to an associate of mine who knows nothing about MR and the “people” there. His response was to sadly talk about “beta males in their basement masturbating to pictures of Asian women.” And the picture accompanying the British Asians post does nothing except reinforce my belief that yellow fever fetishism is an underlying foundational element for support for Silk Road White nationalism among certain White males, and their fantasies of being ordered about my stern-faced female Chinese soldiers with rifles and black boots. Frankly, it is all bizarre and embarrassing. And third party observers who support and enable the spread of MR’s madness out of their sandbox are also morally responsible for the racially destructive outcomes that results from that spread of the Silk Road infection.