And So Roissy Weeps Softly

Deconstructing the most radical left-wing President in US history: “Red Don” Trump. In all cases, emphasis added.

Ted Sallis: Right once again.   I identified Trump as a Negrophilic ultra-cuck fraud as far back as 2015.  Good to see the Alt Wrong is catching up, three years later.

While the Trump base isn’t getting a wall, I guess they can be content with criminal justice reform and increased foreign aid to Central America.

Donald J. Trump: A radical neo-Marxist far-left anti-White SJW.  Antifa Don Trump!

Gee…Mudshark Annie has moved quite far away from In Trump We Trust:

The basic factory setting on the perception of Trump is: gigantic douchebag. This is a man who manufactured fake Time magazine covers featuring himself with the headline, “Donald Trump: The ‘Apprentice’ is a television smash!” so that he could put framed copies of it on the walls of his clubs.

His business is convincing people with lowbrow taste to give him their money.

He’s a vulgar publicity hound who used to call reporters in a fake voice and pretend to be his own PR agent, “John Miller” or “John Barron,” so he could brag that actresses wanted to date him.

On one “Apprentice” episode, the reward for the winning team was: to see Trump’s apartment. Not to eat there or spend the night. They got to see it. “As a little treat,” he said, “you’re gonna see the nicest apartment in New York City.” He added: “I show this apartment to very few people. Presidents, kings …”

It’s not as if a majority of his voters weren’t clear-eyed about what kind of man he is. If anything, Trump’s vulgar narcissism made his vow to build a wall more believable. Respectable politicians had made similar promises over the years—and they always betrayed the voters. Maybe it took a sociopath to ignore elite opinion and keep his word.

On the basis of his self-interest alone, he must know that if he doesn’t build the wall, he has zero chance of being re-elected and a 100 percent chance of being utterly humiliated.

But when Trump is alone with Ivanka, they seem to agree that the wall has nothing to do with it. The people just love him for who he is! In a country of 320 million people, I’m sure there are some, but I have yet to meet a person who said, Yeah, I don’t really care about immigration or trade, I just love his personality!

What else were we going to do? He was the only one talking sense. Unfortunately, that’s all he does: talk. He’s not interested in doing anything that would require the tiniest bit of effort.

In the end, we’ll probably find out “wall” was Trump’s “safe word” with Stormy Daniels. It’s just something he blurts out whenever he’s in trouble.

Hey, Ann, while you were writing In Trump We TrustEGI Notes was calling him a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a fraud.  Gee…I wonder who was right and who was wrong?

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.  All these irresponsible, no-account, affirmative action cases, building “leadership” credentials on the basis of Der Movement’s sweaty ethnic fetishism – none of them can take responsibility for their errors and their endless lapses of judgment.  They’re pathetic.

And, Ann, when you were dating brownsters, folks like me were involved in the “nutty nineties” of “movement” activism.  So why don’t you just sit down, shut up, and go away?

Here’s someone Trump can appoint to his Justice Department.

Has there ever been an elected political leader in America more radically leftist and anti-White than Antifa Don Trump?  Where’s the impeachment?  What’s taking so long already?

And lest I be accused of being “insane” by my critics, yes, my over-the-top criticism of Trump is a bit tongue-in-cheek, and exaggerated for effect.  However, he deserves mocking ridicule and the Quota Crew who supported him deserve it even more. But, you know, even though Trump is not literally a radical far-leftist, in a purely utilitarian sense it doesn’t make a difference.  The end result of his behavior is not significantly different than if he actually was a radical far-leftist, which is why the mocking ridicule is effective.

Hey, Greg Johnson, you were telling us that “women have agency?”  If by “agency” you mean ethical dementia, then, yes, there’s “agency” aplenty.  However, if by “agency” you mean rational thought and accountability, they have none.  Actually, just like “movement” “leaders.”

Great excerpt from Counter-Currents comment criticizing Christianity:

But know this: Christianity failed usThey can never again rule. We tolerate them, not vice versa. Anything less guarantees failure.

Indeed.

Note from Der Movement: The Richard Spencer Show: From China with Love with Jason Unruhe.  Wouldn’t it have been more appropriate to instead have John Derbyshire on a show with that title?

Advertisements