In Der News.
Primate Negress and Neo-Marxist legal group censors Spencer. I despise the Alt Right for making a mockery of racial activism, but I support their free speech rights, and would certainly choose Spencer to support over some alien Africaness.
Spencer and company have legitimate grounds to sue, tortious interference for starters; if this censorship is targeted only to pro-White groups, leaving alone Colored extremists, then extending the interference to discriminatory grounds is possible.
The objection would be: no money for lawyers. Yes, keep on giving the lion’s share of “movement” money to keep the Happy Penguins and Latrine Flies Derbyshire living well, that’s the ticket, right? There IS money, it’s just not going to Spencer and other hard-liners. Whose fault is that? Blame yourselves, Der Movement rank-and-file. Another objection: can’t find a lawyer. If Der Movement had taken the advice, given, literally, for decades (two of them in my case), from some people to first build an infrastructure (including a designated legal team) and then engage in public hijinks, this situation would not exist. Spencer needs to get back online first, second, needs to successfully deal with the lawfare suits targeting him, and then really needs to concentrate on infrastructure building – Richard, you need more folks on your side wearing suits and ties in courtrooms and fewer morons dressed like Captain America in the streets of Charlottesville.
Jewliani believes that “men are disposable” (including him?), but Milady Mantis Head Ivanka is untouchable. I guess that’s the “fundamental premise” in action. I note that Rudy’s pussy pedestalization hasn’t prevented him from careening from one failed marriage to another.
So, we need a “big tent” strategy, but Charlottesville failed because it was open to the entire Right? Basically: whatever Spencer does is wrong. Hypocrisy: it’s good that people don’t “shut down” Johnson when he criticizes them; on the other hand, if someone criticizes Johnson, he bans them from his website. Fair point about GoDaddy – but that’s the price of affirmative action, no prudence, no planning, no common sense. Johnson is also correct about comments sections, including the legal implications. Johnson is also correct about free speech, consistent with my thoughts on this matter.
Is (as Johnson asserts) Taylor doing a service by dividing Jews by being pro-Jewish? What about dividing Whites by being anti-White ethnic? My problem with Amren in regard to this is not that they are Jew-friendly. After all, they’ve been that way even when I was writing for them, and I accepted it as a strategic approach similar to what Johnson is talking about. My problem is with them being pro-Jewish and at the same time anti-White ethnic. And all the “yellow supremacist” talk just adds to it; in other words, Jews and Asians are considered high caste and White ethnics are low caste (in the case of the swarthoids, untouchables). It’s the double standard that’s the problem. If you are going to be accepting of Jews and avoid any and all criticism of Jews, then probably you should extend the same courtesy to all of the native peoples of Europe. It’s not “White advocacy” to value Levantines and Orientals over Europeans.
Jewish “WNs” driven away from Amren because of MacDonald, as per Cofnas? Nonsense. The rabbi left because his Jewish school gave him a choice – us or them. The other Jews left after the Duke-Hart dust-up, blame that on Duke and Hart, not MacDonald. Finally, the Jews in Amren were destructive: Hart promoting a multiracial “White separatist state” or Levin saying that racial preservation for its own sake is “insane,” or Weissberg promoting the “racial status quo.” And one can only imagine where Derbyshire got the “latrine flies” insult from.
Johnson hates snobs? The lack of self-awareness is amazing. And the supporter of intra-European ethnic cleansing denounces “imperialism” and “genocide.” And is “drinking and drugs” really the worst “degeneracy” in the “movement?”
Robert Griffin goes semi-Nordicist. It was just a matter of time, I guess. Does he really think that the System supports White ethnics and is only against Nordics?
Sailer cites 23andMe stupidities.
This retardation manifests when people start taking seriously low percentage results – I’m 4.2% this or 0.2% that – seriously, particularly at the 50% confidence rating that’s the default setting at the site. Needless to say, the “timing the date of admixture” feature is equally ludicrous. What’s going on with 23andMe is the same principle as Der Movement’s stupidities on race: turning legitimate science into trashy garbage tends to delegitimize the legitimate science, because the run-of-the-mill idiot is unable to distinguish science from trash. So, biological race is real, population genetics can be interesting, and genetic kinship is fundamental to genetic interests. But then people look at 23andMe nonsense, get confused, angry, misled, and/or disgusted, and then think the whole idea of racial genetics is nonsense, rather than the company’s product itself. Likewise, racial science is real, and racial history is real, but Der Movement makes a mockery of it with HBD and Kempism, so many people get disgusted once they realize how they’ve been misled. Instead on turning against HBD or Kemp, they instead turn to “spiritual race” theories, like Yockey and Evola did when confronted with the nonsense of their time (Guntherism and calipers).