Category: affirmative action in action

More on Rome and Odds and Ends

Several issues.

Read this.  Emphasis added:

Although inhumation was practiced regularly in archaic Rome, cremation was the most common burial practice in the Mid- to Late Republic and the Empire into the 1st and 2nd centuries. Crematory images appear in Latin poetry on the theme of the dead and mourning. In one of the best-known classical Latin poems of mourning, Catullus writes of his long journey to attend to the funeral rites of his brother, who died abroad, and expresses his grief at addressing only silent ash.[13] When Propertius describes his dead lover Cynthia visiting him in a dream, the revenant’s dress is scorched down the side and the fire of the pyre has corroded the familiar ring she wears.[14]

Ultimately, inhumation would replace cremation; a variety of factors, including decreasing levels of urbanization and changes in attitudes to the afterlife, would contribute to this marked shift in popular burial practices.

So, a problem with the recent Rome paper – that is of course not their fault but they could have specifically mentioned it as a limitation of their study – is that they had to work with the samples available, those that were inhumed. They do make a statement in their supplementary section about class differences in Rome and how they believe they have a relatively representative sample, but they really cannot know this. 

In any case, consider the cremation issue. First, this may in part explain why they had so few Iron/Age Republics samples.  Second, and perhaps more importantly, it raises issues of representation later on as well. Were certain classes of Roman society more likely to cremate vs. inhume in any given period?  One finding of the paper was that the dominant ethnotype of the Iron Age/Republic samples – the more “West Mediterranean” type – was grossly under-represented in the Imperial samples. Was that because of a demographic displacement/replacement so significant as to be mirrored in the sample representation?  Or is at least part of the explanation that during the Imperial period most of the old Roman stock cremated their dead, while newcomers were more likely to inhume?

Sample sizes and assumptions about how representative the samples are – these are the two biggest weaknesses of the study. There’s nothing the authors can do about what the Romans did for their funerary practices but, as stated, they should have mentioned this, explicitly, in the main text of the paper. One can hope for more studies on other samples, if such are available.

With respect to “movement” heavy breathing, these issues can cut in both directions. Der Movement may wish to claim that all the Dolph Lundgrens in a toga were cremated and thus not analyzed; a counter-argument could be that the old Roman upper classes were all Julius Evolas in a toga, and that these are under-represented in the Iron Age/Republic because of cremation.  

Ancient Rome has become an excavation site known for its rather extravagant cemeteries. All in all, the commoners and wealthy families of Rome were buried in the same cemeteries; the wealthy, however, had more elaborate tombs. The tombs of the wealthy were typically cut out of bedrock and rectangular in shape. 

Any way of correlating the remains studied to social status?  According to the authors, no.

A Medicist critique of the paper by Crimson Guard:

They do not use any ancient samples aside from the Italian ones, but instead choose to use modern non Europeans Middle Eastern peoples as if these people have never underwent change,lol.  A minority of the Imperial samples group around Cypriots and where Ashkenazi/Sephardic Jews would often cluster around. Such Jews are mixed with European (primarily Roman era Italians and Greeks). It also does not take into account that certain Mediterranean populations like Druze and Turks tend to be closer to Southern Europeans due to a Neolithic and Bronze/Iron Age connection(including Sea People/Philistines) along with West to East migrations, here they interpret everything based on historical movements where its basically one way admixtures. They try to connect African to mean Sub-Saharan and Phoenicians with Sub-Saharan Africans and do the same with the North-African Ibero-Maurasian(which somehow also means or includes Neolithic Moroccans to them)  – meanwhile the R475 sample Etruscan is no where near North Africa let alone  Sub-Saharans Yoruba.  R80 and R132 are much more closer to Cypriots than to North Africans.

They also claim that I-M253 haplogroup arose in Northern Europe meanwhile early examples were found among  Linear Ware samples from Hungary.  LBK   had affinities to modern-day populations from the Near East and Anatolia. Steppe peoples were not Western Hunter Gathers either and they were not “European either.

These criticism are mostly correct.  And the inclusion of Basques in the Central/Northern Europe cluster is not only mindboggedly stupid, but is made to look nonsensical by the PCAs they included in their own paper. The haplotype sharing data became skewed by these bizarre and subjective decisions, never mind the labels they gave to various genetic ancestry components.

I’m sure the Nordicists will have different complaints and/or wildly alternative explanations.  I have repeatedly said that it is difficult to separate politics from population genetics. And if you believe that population geneticists themselves are free of political bias when it comes to their science, then you are painfully naïve.

However, there is much useful information in the paper, so we need to sift through the trash to find the isolated useful nuggets.


From the paper’s supplementary section (emphasis added):

…highlighting the substantial influence of this “eastern” influence on the genetic makeup of central Italians in Iron Age. Furthermore, the influence of this “eastern” ancestry is not limited to R437 and R850, as R1016 and R1015 can also be modeled as RMPR_CA + Anatolia_IA.SG, and R1016 (but not R1015) as RMPR_CA + Armenia_LBA

Thus, the Iron Age/Republic samples, at least some of them, seem more “Mediterranean” than those from the preceding Copper Age.  This is not consistent with “movement” dogma, despite whatever “spin” they would like to give.

Further, the higher WHG-related ancestry in some Iron Age/Republic samples are most likely due to derivation from the Copper Age situation in which higher WHG ancestry came into play, possibly through admixture with Neolithic populations with greater WHG percentages.  Based on the PCA data, those would seem most likely to be of the Ibero-Basque West Mediterranean type.

HBD fraud on display.

Yet another of the pitiful juvenile retards that Greg Johnson is dredging out of the Alt Right sewer to “write” for Counter-Currents.  The kids are alright!  Or Alt Right? 

We’re thin, fit, handsome, with strong jaw lines and good haircuts…We dominated them not only physically with our high testosterone voices….

Brandon/Brendan is getting ready to flirt.

Where does Johnson find these people?  Does he advertise? Wanted: Immature Millennial numbnuts to write for “traditionalist” ethnonationalist webzine. Triple digit IQ not required.

In all seriousness, it is good that these “Groypers” are challenging the false conservatives (that includes Trump himself by the way, that “sincere man of genuine greatness”), but the “kids” need to grow up.

Der Alt Right marches on:

Jane Dough 

Oh good. Another article telling the alt-Right to man up. We need more of those.

Gregory, please let us know the date and location for your IRL counter-insurgency, I’ll mark it on my calendar and try to attend.

What’s that, Gregory? Your job is to inspire others to man the barricades?

Oh. Okay.

txjon18  Jane Dough 

Conte is a dunce. Skipping to keep up with Richard Spencer, who himself has the brain of a woman. The problem with the American Alt-Right are the dumb people attempting to speak for it.

Russell McGinnis 

Oh, Good God, who keeps posting the whining and wailing of the Charlottesville drama queens?

They’re gonna continue to have for sure *plenty* to kick, whine, wail and shout about as they get bent over by the opposition…

…they are now Palestinians and have been for some time.

This author is “lazy and weak” because neither he nor his comrades will be caught dead actually taking the time to model the problem and design an actual material response that doesn’t involved whining, histrionics and 40 year jail terms.

Videogames have destroyed an entire generation

Putting aside the Beavis-and-Butthead aspects of the podcast, and whatever ideological criticisms I have – they are essentially (whether they admit it  or not) pathetic pro-minority Christian civil nationalists – the criticisms they make of Spencer and the Alt Right are on point. Unfortunately, these idiots are just as bad as what they criticize.  

Great Christians there who say “go fuck yourself” to anyone who disagrees with them.  Yes, you idiots, I don’t believe in “god” ‘– “god is the truth.”  I will quote Pontius Pilate – “what is truth?”  Cue these idiots telling me to “go fuck yourself.”  Very “godly” that! Godly!  Christian!  The mocking and ridicule of Richard Spencer – Godly! Christian!  I dislike Christians not only for ideological reasons but because of their consistent personal hypocrisy.  In my life I have known many people who called themselves “Christian” but in fact I have never known a single authentic Christian – someone who walks the walk and not just talks the talk.  Nietzsche was right – there was only one Christian and he died on the cross.  On second thought, St. Francis was also a genuine Christian – so here is a role model for all the Christnats to emulate.

And so one night, before bed, I decided to try it. I knelt down, next to my futon, adjusting my bare knees on the hard floor. I put my hands together, did one last eye-roll, cleared my throat, and commenced speaking to God.

It wasn’t a long conversation. But I did notice a certain calm come over me as I whispered in the dark. Also, it clarified in my mind what was really important in my life at that moment. That I stay sober. That I support my family and friends. That I be a good person to whatever degree I could.

I felt a sense of completion and satisfaction when I was done. Who, specifically, I was talking to when I did this, I could not determine then, and have never bothered to figure out since. My “God” is neither an old man on a cloud or the supernatural father of Jesus. He remains the same formless presence that appeared across from me that first night.

But if I actually stop and think about it, I would have to admit that this invisible entity definitely feels more male than female. To me, God is like a wise older man . . . a father, or a coach. But he isn’t always older. At times he’s like a close friend, a person who knows me better than I know myself, and whose perspective is larger than my own. In that sense, my personal God probably is male. To be totally honest, I cannot picture God as a female.

This is the guy cruising around Eastern Europe looking for native women to lay.  Apparently God – in the guise of Roissy and Roosh – was advising him on that. Note as well we’re apparently dealing with another Alt Right drunk.

The worst writer in the history of the Far Right strikes again.

Why would a handsome Prince of the Realm be dating Gavin Newsom’s 50-year-old sloppy seconds? Kim Guilfoyle is a year older than Melania Trump, and unlike the First Lady, does not carry the Balkan genes which have made Barron Trump a giant among men…

Cue Greg Johnson sweatily comparing the height of Barron Trump to that of Tom Cruise. Perhaps he can borrow some really big calipers from Durocher to accomplish the task.

But assuming you’ve got no time, patience, or energy for more than one Jeelvyan irascible philippic per day, the operative concept is the following: In order to shore up their relevance, Alt Lite, center-Right, and centrist types have to constantly proclaim victory after victory and loudly trumpet the size and scope of their following.

Sounds like Der Movement, no?  But then….

The deeper, Dissident Right doesn’t need to be massive…

That’s good, since the influence of the “Dissident Right” can be measured in microns.

…or even win all that often…

Good to see they are sufficiently self-aware there.

…in order to be relevant…

Which they’re not.

…our legitimacy…

Is non-existent.

…is derived from our allegiance to the truth. 

Hah!

We do not have to signal our high status…

There’s nothing to signal.

…it is self-evident from our quest for the answers to the really tough questions. 

Tough question – how to squeeze more “D’Nations” from all them suckers?

This makes us robust…

As a mouse.

…even a little bit antifragile to failure.

Good to hear it, or else they’d be falling apart several times per day.

I’ve noticed that whenever there is a Jew-Gentile conflict in the United States, there is often a Yankee vs. Jew situation in play…This also applies in the in the Demjanjuk case. Of course, Demjanjuk’s ancestors weren’t on the Mayflower or Arbella, he was most certainly not a Unitarian Universalist or Congregationalist, and he’d probably never heard of Cotton Mather. However, put his son and son-in-law (both shown in the film) in a blue Union Army uniform and they wouldn’t look out of place in Mr. Lincoln’s Army.

I mean, this is incredibly, outrageously retarded even for Counter-Currents. This idiotic author inserts a completely superfluous aside about “Yankee vs. Jew situation” conflict – which hasn’t existed for decades, quite the opposite according to Lind’s “American Tribes” paradigm – in an essay about the Demjanjuk case, and then tries to justify using a Ukrainian to illustrate the “Yankee vs. Jew situation” with “…put his son and son-in-law (both shown in the film) in a blue Union Army uniform and they wouldn’t look out of place in Mr. Lincoln’s Army.”  If I actually tried to mock and ridicule Counter-Currents by attempting to invent some sort of absurdity one would expect from the site as it is exists today, I couldn’t be able to come up with anything so ludicrous. Congratulations for hitting a new low.

It is amazing that even after the embarrassing collapse of the Alt Right, the complete exposure of WN 2.0 as a pitifully pathetic empty shell, and the humiliations of Trump’s endless betrayals, the Beavis-and-Butthead crowd are still pushing the Pepe nonsense.

But, but, but…He’s a sincere man of genuine greatness, and don’t you forget it!  Also, send in those “D”Nations” to Counter-Currents.  After all, those who give live in the golden age today!


And what if someone’s entire “activist” history is one long “faux pas?”  Any accountability?


Hey! If affirmative action is still banned in Washington state, then why do we have “movement leaders” living there?


A book for Der Movement.


Fisking Zman:

One of the curious things about conservatism, as in Buckley-style conservatism, is that it never examined its failures. Even today, when asked about why they were unable to muster a defense against the homosexualization of the culture, a guy like Charlie Kirk is poleaxed by the question. He’s standing in front of a sign that reads “culture war” alongside a homosexual and he is baffled about the question. Even the more thoughtful and honest among conservatives have a huge blind spot for their past.

Rewritten:

One of the curious things about Der Movement, as in the Alt Right, is that it never examined its failures. Even today, when asked about why they were unable to muster a defense against the homosexualization of the “movement,” activists are poleaxed by the question. They talk about “traditionalism” alongside homosexuals and are baffled about the question. Even the more thoughtful and honest among Alt Righters have a huge blind spot for their past.

Back to Zman:

Conservatives never stop to think that maybe California is what the ruling class wants for all of North America. After all, the people running those tech giants are living great lives. In fact, they live lives no mortals have experienced in the history of man, so from their perspective, the system works. It’s not just the plutocrats at the top. All the way down the line, the managerial elite is now living as aristocrats. Sure, there is rot down toward the bottom, but that’s true of all ruling elites.

Rewritten:

Rank-and-file activists never stop to think that maybe Der Movement is what the ruling class wants for all of racial activism. After all, the people running those blogs and organizations are living great lives. From their perspective, the system works. It’s not just the “rock stars” at the top. All the way down the line, the Quota Queens are now living as racial aristocrats. Sure, there is rot between the ears, but that’s true of all “movement” elites.

Back to Zman:

The United States was never a nation in the tradition sense. It was always a federation of nations. The structure the Founders created was an explicit acknowledgement of it. The regional difference in the colonies at the time of the founding were not superficial. Those regional differences are still with us today, despite the migrant wave unleashed on many parts by the ruling class. America was always a house with many mansions.

These guys extend their ethnonationalism to the concept of America itself.  There is nothing they don’t try to divide. Ever notice that all these types are supporters of HBD?

The Alt Right Killed American Racial Activism

Who killed the “movement?”

Der Movement marches on.  I will assume for the sake of argument that the recording actually is what it is purported to be, and not a hoax. If it is a hoax, then Spencer should take legal action against Yiannopoulos (*). I would like to point out that this is a lose-lose situation for racial activism (as usual for Der Movement).  If the recording is true then all conclusions we can make about it and what it says about the “movement” and its “leadership” are 100% on point, AND it also exposes the utter lack of judgment of Der Movement for ever having anything to do with the likes of Yiannopoulos to begin with (*).  If the recording is a hoax, then this underscores even more strongly the horrific bad judgment of Der Movement about Yiannopoulos and the whole “big tent” strategy of allying with the Alt Lite (that, if you remember, I openly denounced at the time, while others, like Johnson, were enthusiastically supporting it.  Gee…guess who was right and who was wrong).

It is not clear why Spencer was blaming Jews and black people for the death.

Yiannopoulos is being a disingenuous jackass there.  Spencer had every right to be angry and every right to blame “Jews and black people”- as well as the city of Charlottesville – for the fatty’s death, and for all the negativism that stuck to the Alt Right after that. Regardless of what we may think of the wisdom of the Unite the Right rally, and how it was organized, the fact is that it was legal. The Type I numbnuts were fully within their legal rights to be there.  By itself, the rally would not have been violent, and no one would have died.  The problems were caused, wholly, by the “anti-racist” protesters – that not only included Jews and Blacks in their ranks but who had Jewish and Black “anti-racist leadership” backing – AND by the Charlottesville authority’s disgusting display of both inaction as well as support and enabling of the protests (for which they were criticized by many people, not only on the Right).

However, all of that said, if the recording is accurate, being (justifiably) angry is not an excuse for a leader to start ranting like a deranged madman, making comments that fully support the “White supremacist” “crazed hater” smear of White nationalism.  Two wrongs don’t make a right. Antifa and Charlottesville, in any fair assessment of blame, are ultimately responsible for the death of the Lipid Queen.  That in no way justified the demented rant captured on the recording (that, by the way, does Spencer’s legal arguments in the civil suit no good).

If you remember, I defended Spencer after Hailgate, writing that while it was a mistake, showing poor judgment (what else is new), it wasn’t that big of a deal. In retrospect, I was in error (I do admit error), because I see a clear connection between Hailgate and this recording (again assuming it is true and accurate).  Complete lack of self-control (Hey!  I though these big-brained northern hunter gatherer types had stoic discipline and all those gesticulating swarthoid manlets rant and rave?), poor judgment, immaturity, a lack of balance, an inability to plan for contingencies (Hey!  I thought “evolving in the harsh northern winters” made all these societal consensus guys masters of careful planning?), poor optics, and the whole Beavis-and-Butthead atmosphere of the Alt Right, all on display.  This all, by the way, does nothing but make me believe that all of Pilleater’s accusations about these guys (*) were factual.

This whole episode clearly demonstrates once again why the Alt Right collapsed, and why it took American racialism down with it. Even if the recording turns out to be a hoax, it still demonstrates that, because all of this Alt Right-Alt Lite infighting (and the original associations to the Alt Liters) was an easily avoidable mistake (as was the entire Unite the Right fiasco) and the Alt Right and its “leaders” have to take responsibility for it. They wanted a big tent. It was Johnson who told us, with his typical bombastic certainty, that “the Alt Right was White nationalism or nothing at all.” These guys tied the Alt Right to the Alt Lite, and then they tied the Alt Right to White nationalism. They wrecked American White nationalism, and that is true regardless of whether the recording is accurate or not.  It is either a “rock star” public relations disaster or it is an Alt Lite hoax (I believe the former).

Ah, all you rank-and-file morons out there…I warned you about the Alt Right. I warned you that Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism would wreck (American) racial nationalism. And as all the Quota Queens – including Boomers making fools of themselves – jumped on the Alt Right train, I sounded the warning, as far back as 2016. I was right, but I was – as usual – ignored. Enjoy the fruits of your conformist following of your “leaders,” all you Type I rank-and-file retards. Enjoy it long and hard. And, yes, let’s hear more about the dastardly “Boomers” and how superior WN 2.0 is to WN 1.0.  Unite the Right was a Millennial escapade, with a thin veneer of Generation X Millennial wanna-bes in positions of authority.  I was admonished that “you don’t understand the youth culture.” On the contrary, I understand it all too well.  

I also have been warning you about the dangers of ethnic affirmative action in racial activism, particularly with respect to positions of leadership. I have been ignored about that as well. And I’ve been proven right time and again (simultaneously, we have this incident as well as Johnson coming back to America with his tail between his legs, having gone to another Scandza conference after the Denmark fiasco).

More embarrassing humiliation brought to you by the Type I affirmative action crowd.

Look at the litany of woe just in the last few days.  White nationalist leader arrested in Norway and deported!  White supremacist accused of conspiring to attack synagogue!  Calls for Twitter to ban Spencer after secret recording is leaked!

But, no worries. I’m sure that when even worse disasters occur in Der Movement in the coming months, these defeats and humiliations will be forgotten. After all,your “leadership” provide to you a never-ending supply of humiliating defeat.

So, Zman discusses how bad things are now, and how open activism is impossible (*). Whose fault is that, Zman?  Who took the golden opportunity offered by the rise of right-wing populism under Trump and completely squandered it?  Who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory? Who is it who is ALWAYS WRONG and ALWAYS INEPT and ALWAYS DEMONSTRATING PISS-POOR JUDGMENT?  Thar’s your guys, my dear Zman, all your Alt Right heroes, all your “movement” “rock stars,” all your Type Is, all your affirmative action “leaders.”  All YOU people who eagerly jumped on the Alt Right train and stood firmly on it until it crashed – YOU are responsible.  So stop whining now, and admit your complicity in the collapse.  And admit that the “crazy and bitter” Ted Sallis was 100% absolutely correct. Admit it was Ted Sallis who clearly saw that the Alt Right was a danger to racial activism and that it would lead racialism in America to the abyss – and predicted that at the height of the Alt Right’s peak, in 2016 and early 2017.  But you can’t admit that, as it would make your entire “movement” house of cards collapse.  So keep on pretending that the situation is just what it is, as a result of nefarious forces of web-spinning effete males and frustrated cat ladies, with no responsibility for a failed “movement” and its meritless affirmation action leadership. Dishonest scum.

*This action by Yiannopoulos reminds me of Pilleater’s (possibly illegal) recording of his call with Johnson and the release of it.  On the one hand, those two did all of us a service by exposing things that we should really know. On the other hand, I have complete contempt for their despicable and dishonorable behavior (and it is perhaps not a coincidence that one is homosexual and the other bisexual). There were certain “movement” events that I have been aware of, which would have made certain heroes look bad (and would do nothing but support my criticisms of these people), but I have kept silent. Maybe exposing these things would be a service, but still I do not believe it to be the right thing to do.  I would not have done what Yiannopoulos and Pilleater have done.  But having done it, and having all of that out now in the public domain, we all have a responsibility to evaluate it and its meaning.

**This is not necessarily true; Amren still is able to run their conferences (for whatever good they do).  

Incel Rebellion

Reaching out to the disenfranchised.

Extending from “movement” discussion about the woman problem, I note this comment:

I have no problem with “losers in their mama’s basement” being in our movement. These are the white people who, in addition to whatever faults they might or might not have, have been systematically discriminated against as whites (particularly as white males) and systematically demoralized and even made mentally ill by the sick anti-white indoctrination that they have received from the schools and the media.

If we can’t embrace and help these people — welcoming them while recognizing that the abuse they have suffered will have affected their personalities and character, then what are we here for? I know what I’m here for — to defend myself and my fellow white people, especially my fellow white males who have suffered the double whammy of being demonized and discriminated against both as whites and as males.

I agree. That contrasts to “movement leaders” such as Spencer and their constant ridicule against incels and other disenfranchised White men.  

It is absolutely mind-boggling that “movement leaders” publicly and aggressively mock, ridicule, and attack their followers and, more importantly, potential followers as “incels,” and “manlets” and other System-approved insults against disenfranchised White men. This can be called, for want of a better term, “Chad posturing,” failed “movement leaders” engaging in high school-level “throw the nerds in the locker” ego-stroking chest-beating to the detriment of the well-being of racial activism.

The idea that all “incels” – never mind the MGTOWs (many of whom actually have voluntarily given up on women, contrary to those who claim MGTOWs are simply incels in denial) – are pimply-faced losers hiding in their parents’ basements, and hence worthy of being rejected from racial activism, is just System propaganda.  Now, of course, some of them are just such people, but not all, and, likely, not most. I believe that most incels are simply (White) beta males who are shut out of the sexual marketplace by female hypergamy, crazed feminism, and the racial-sexual caste system that places White men at the bottom of hierarchy (and the anti-incel “movement leaders” thus tacitly support this anti-White hierarchy). Instead of embracing these White men, instead of calling them brothers and welcoming them into the fold of pro-White activism, our gaggle of “leaders” reject them and force them into an unnatural aracial alliance with non-White incels (mostly Asians). The self-defeating stupidity of this is breathtaking (but not surprising).

The “movement” surprisingly had the correct “take” on the Sky King episode, but they are unable to realize that for every person who indulges in a romantic gesture of defiant self-destruction, there are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands, of similar individuals who haven’t quite reached that point yet, and who are excellent human material for a dissident movement.  Instead of enthusiastically reaching out to this mass, and selecting from it the best quality recruits, the “movement” scorns them.  After all, we can’t all be as successful as the Prince of Pilleater and the King of Charlottesville now, can we?  If these “leaders” believe they need to eschew incels because they don’t want their “movement” tainted by “losers” then they have the entire situation backwards. The incels instead would be justified eschewing a pathetic “movement” that is defined by constant failure.


And I would like to point out that mainstream conservatives – and, yes, that means Bannon too – contemptuously attempt to use incels in an instrumental manner,  And then we have that estrogen-enriched effeminate freak Wylie pontificating publicly about it. The incels get it from all sides. Disenfranchised by society.  Hated by the Left.  Targeted by the Matriarchy. Exploited by conservatives.  Mocked and ridiculed by the Chad Right.

As a side note, I won’t even go into detail about the utter stupidity of the “manlet” slur, as if height is some sort of relevant criteria for a man to be a successful and competent activist. Richard “wrecked the Alt Right” Spencer and Greg “strangely obsessed with the height of Tom Cruise” Johnson are perfect examples of this. They can mock “manlets” all they want, but they can’t escape the taint of their own constant comic ineptness and unremitting failure.

Getting back to incels and related individuals, I define the group in question, the group in its broadest dimensions, as Incels-MGTOW-Men’s Rights-Manosphere: IMMM. These IMMMers – and here I specifically refer to White men only – can be a potent force. Dissident movements often have recruited among the socially disenfranchised, but the point is to select the best among those. Of the many White IMMMers there are large numbers who are quality individuals, and of those, there may be thousands, maybe tens of thousands, who have the potential to be high-tier activists. The National Socialists recruited their Brownshirts from among the disenfranchised.  Given the ascetic nature of the Legionaries of Romania, there were no doubt proto-incels and proto-MGTOWs among them. These were not “losers.”  They were political solders, or a caliber much greater than the sniggering Beavis-and-Butthead “Chads” and grifters who prance and preen on the “movement” stage with their attitude of superiority over those less well off (but who ask for “D’Nations” from them). We may have among the current IMMMers similar people of quality as the Legionaries, solid human material for pro-White racial activism. Thus, we observe yet another opportunity being recklessly squandered by the incompetent Quota Queens lifted to positions of leadership by the “movement’s” ethnic affirmative action policy.

I will give advice of “dos and don’ts” to IMMMers, starting with the “don’ts”. Don’t give in to despair. Don’t engage in acts of violence, lashing out, which does nothing but empower female victimology as well as destroy your own life, while practically accomplishing nothing and actually damaging the cause you profess to believe in.  Don’t make common cause with racially alien men, whose presence in your country plays an important role in your own dispossession and disenfranchisement, and who are given advantages by the System over you. And don’t believe that White racial activism is completely defined by the Chads, freaks, queers, and grifters who mock you and your plight, or who ignore you in favor of the Matriarchy.

Do become as successful as you can in your life.  Yes, the deck is stacked against you, but you still have room to maneuver, you can still rise in the face of your oppression, and your success will be an extended middle finger to the System, the Yeastbuckets, and the mocking Chads.  Do become racially conscious, embracing a militantly revolutionary pan-European nationalism.  Do get involved in politics, broadly defined, make your voice heard, infiltrate the System, vote, run for office, start blogs, network, and get out into the world and make an impact to defend your interests and those of your kind. Do support revolutionary voices who speak out in defense of disenfranchised White men, such as the Ted Sallis/EGI Notes/Western Destiny groupuscule. Do send the link to this post around like-minded colleagues, spread the word about this blog and what it stands for. Create your own groupuscules…JUST DO.

It is time to make your voices heard.  It is time to stand up like men and make your impact on society, in a manner that will have lasting effect, not by some infantile acting out. It’s time to get out of the shadows and into the light, into the arena, into the fray of politics, broadly defined, as well as metapolitics. It is time for defiance, a time to make a stand.  It is time for the Incel Rebellion to demonstrate to an uncaring society, to the sneering of the SJW Left and the mocking of the Beavis-and-Butthead Right, that you will no longer be ignored, that you are a force that must be accommodated. Review the Dos and Don’t’s and do the former and don’t do the latter.  And help spread the word about those who support you, such as this blog and its associated groupuscule.  


As regards the latter, note that I ask nothing from you except assistance in “spreading the word.”  Unlike the grifters of the “mainstream” Far Right, I do not ask for money, unlike the mainstream conservatives I do not ask that you go out and vote Republican, and I derive no income from this blog so my request to “spread the word” is not rent-seeking behavior.  My objectives are purely political and personally disinterested – to actualize pro-White policies, to pursue White interests, to remake society, and, in particular, to defend the interests of the natural leaders of White society – White MEN.  This battle is your battle as well.

Smash the System!  

(but do it wisely, prudently,and legally)

Grist for the Mill

More hard truths about the female.

Behold the female (emphasis added):

Psychologist Leon F. Seltzer has offered explanations for the phenomenon of male serial killers attracting female sex partners based on evolutionary psychology. Serial killers, in his view, are cases of alpha males that tend to attract women. This is because such males were good at protecting women and their offspring in our evolutionary history. Women nowadays may consciously realize that it is unwise to date a serial killer, but they are nevertheless attracted to them, as he notes “as a therapist I’ve encountered many women who bemoaned their vulnerability toward dominant men who, consciously, they recognized were all wrong for them”. As evidence of women’s fantasy preference for dominant men, he refers to the book A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World’s Largest Experiment Reveals about Human Desire by Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam. Seltzer discusses Ogas and Gaddam’s argument that this fantasy is the dominant plot of most erotic/romantic books and movies written for women but the fantasy always holds that this male dominance is conditional, “it doesn’t really represent the man’s innermost reality.”

One of the most infamous examples of hybristophilia is the large number of women attracted to Ted Bundy after his arrest. He often drew scores of women at the jammed courtrooms of his trials each day. Bundy allegedly received hundreds of love letters from women while he was incarcerated.
Jeffrey Dahmer, a serial killer, is said to have had amorous women sending him letters, money, and other gifts during his time in prison.
Serial killer Richard Ramirez married a female groupie in prison who had written him over 75 letters. During his trial, dozens of women flocked to the courtroom to catch a glimpse of him.
Charles Manson’s groupies are also examples .
Terrorists such as Anders Behring Breivik and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have also been the objects of hybristophilia.

Hundreds of love letters.  Hundreds.  For every single individual male serial killer or other male celebrity criminal – someone openly and obviously identified as defective by society – there are large numbers of ordinary “normal” women madly in love with them. And then there are the findings (this is just one example) that show that men with a criminal record are more successful with women than are law-abiding men.

Women: A sex selected by evolution to be demented sociopaths in the modern world.  All grist for the mill for Der Movement.  Indeed, sociopathic male grifters would want vacuous female airheads around, and this is more so if the males in question are impervious to the sexually manipulative behavior of (in particular, attractive) women. The women are part of the “D’Nations” herd and can be lures to bring in thirsty beta males as more cattle to be milked for “D’Nations.”

Read this.

Counter-Currents comment:

Brandon Martinez
Posted October 26, 2019 at 2:34 am | Permalink
If you believe that a substantial portion of modern white women can be “red-pilled” and join our cause, you are severely deluded. Women follow the crowd, and the crowd is against us. Only when fascist dictators came to power did women get in line out of necessity. If it’s not a necessity, they will simply tow the line of the predominant cultural narrative being set by our enemies. Trying to win over white women to white nationalism is about as futile as trying to win over jews or blacks to it. It is a wasted effort and energy better placed elsewhere, such as in obtaining political power.

Yes. Now, let us be clear here.  My comments about women are all about plain honesty and ice-cold realism. I never said that women should be completely excluded from activism. Consider the Legionary movement.  It was all male, but had an associated women’s group. That is reasonable, particularly if the women in their own group are held to high standards as are the men.  But we should never forget the reality of sex differences and never forget that the women should be subordinate to the men.

Greg Johnson
Posted October 25, 2019 at 6:33 pm | Permalink
I think she is a groupie. She was sleeping with Eli Mosley, and the scuttlebutt at the time was that she was dragging on more than Richard Spencer’s cigarette while he was still married, and while she was with Mosley — or at least pretending publicly to be with him.

Johnson should ask the following two questions – if Spencer is really as vacuous and destructive and amoral as you apparently believe he is, then how did he so quickly rise to prominence in the “movement?’’  Why did he so quickly get folks like Regnery trusting in him?  An honest answer to those questions would have to include an acknowledgment that Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program is a very real thing, and that Spencer checked off all of the boxes – none of which included the item of actual merit.

Let’s all feel bad now for this horrendous little Ladogan, whining about being mistreated online. Welcome to the rough-and-tumble of celebrity politics, you obnoxious semi-mongoloid twit. No one forced you to be a public figure, with your harridan “how dare you” and all the rest.  A perfect example of the female mentality.  This is where Johnson, as usual, gets it all wrong.  It’s not that WE say “women have no agency.”  It is that women themselves, when the going gets too tough, start whining as if THEY believe they have no agency, and therefore should have no accountability for their actions. They want equality of rights, but no equality of responsibilities.  They behave like spoiled children. 

Greg Johnson
Posted October 26, 2019 at 4:10 pm | Permalink
There aren’t millions of people in the movement.
And the Alt Right did crash and burn because of bad decisions made by bad leaders.

Yes, indeed; case in point: Greg Johnson.

Greg Johnson
Posted October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm | Permalink
Whenever you see a sycophant like Evan McClaren or Chris Dulny, I want you to think of a tiny fish that clings desperately to a big fish for the ride — as well as for the privilege of eating its shit.

You forgot to include John Morgan on that list.

Odds and Ends, 9/18/19

Odds and ends.

Listen to this Forney podcast about TRS.  Whatever you may think about Forney, he is doing an excellent job deconstructing the anti-White monstrosity known as Der Movement.  Keep it up, Mr. Forney. Shine a bright light on the roaches and make them scurry for cover.

The Quota Queens are at it again; it seems like they’re back obsessing over Princess Tulsi Coconut.  Has the Andy Eggroll enthusiasm waned so quickly?  Or is Princess Coconut only a place-holder until a future AOC Presidential candidacy?

This is a good Amren video.  I was amused though about Taylor talking about folks with “WASP reserve” not wanting to “rattle the tin cup” (a phrase familiar to readers of EGI Notes, I’m sure).  It’s interesting though that the folks who are not rattling the tin cup are not WASPs, while those who are so rattling, are.  Swarthoid reserve?

A response to the absurd Counter-Currents essay on Hubert Humphrey and Minnesota discussed here yesterday:

Don
Posted September 17, 2019 at 7:13 pm | Permalink
I don’t understand the point of this essay, which simply outlines the betrayal of WHITE people by WHITE LEADERS. I already knew this and so did everybody else.
Do we need WHITES in Minnesota?
Ah…..yes. That would be nice. But if they have such high IQ’s, why are they so committed to importing MUD people to replace them? WHITES have got to start wanting to be saved. If WHITES are willing to accept extermination, no amount of activism by us can save them. It’s that simple.
I don’t know.  Some folks believe we need more men like Hubert Humphrey; I believe we need more men like Corneliu Codreanu. This is a gulf that cannot be bridged, and essentially summarizes my unending hostility toward Der Movement.

Quo Vadis pan-Europeanism?

Whither pan-Europeanism?

Anyone else notice that Amren is really pushing the work of McCulloch recently?  Once again Sallis is proven correct, as I predicted that the HBD-Nordicist alliance, with Jewish/Asian interests in the background, will always attempt to divide Europeans against each other. Der Movement is tiresomely predictable, and the HBDers most of all.

Comment from the threads:

Miss Annie  

Southern and Eastern Europeans are admixed with Asian and Arab blood due to wars and invasions during the Middle Ages onward. For example, Spain and Portugal were conquered by Muslims in the eight century. It took eight centuries to get rid of the Muslims, but they still left their legacy in its inhabitants which, in turn, slowed the country’s economic growth as well scientific and literary progress.

Evidence of Siberian/East Asian admixture in Northern Europe – which even the radically hardcore Nordicist Durocher now admits exists (although he claims it is “beneficial” to all humanity) – is of course excluded from such screeds.  

Note to White ethnics – leave Der Movement ASAP.  

Now, let’s look at input on this matter from everyone’s favorite dishonest commentator Silver: 

For some people, the racial and cultural differences become too significant to paper over as one moves from northwest Europe to southeast Europe. Although pan-European ideals hold some degree of personal appeal for me, I think it’s terribly unrealistic to expect most people to ever share them. Pan-Slavism had more going for it than pan-Europeanism, but even that never really got off the ground.

Slav is technically not a racial term, but I am not opposed to its use in this way. There is less racial variation among the people encompassed by the linguistic term Slav than there is in the racial term ‘white’, after all.

I have the impression that people tend to run away from Slav as a racial identifier in a bid to avoid association with the sorts of things that WNs have historically regarded as backward or inferior in Slavic cultures. This is especially so if they are coming at WN from a national socialist angle.

Despite the numerous factors in its favor, pan-Slavism would, I agree, have served as little more than a vehicle for the promotion of Russian interests, simply given the sheer weight of numbers on the Russian side.

It’s easy enough to proclaim European unity, especially in internet comments, but achieving actual unity in real world activism is rather more difficult.

A racial movement is not like other movements, in which membership is determined by the views a person claims to hold. Membership is decided by visual identification. No amount of pleading will ever persuade some people to accept those they visually identify as too racially divergent, nor do constant reassurances do much to assuage the doubts of those whose inclusion is questioned.

The history of racial activism has amply demonstrated, I think, that any real world get-together will always be infected by such hardliners who will invariably express their views and question other people’s inclusion, leading to bickering and self-doubt – at which point any presumed ‘unity’ goes out the window.

The only way I can see for a racial movement to surmount this problem is market itself as a cultural movement – to promote a European cultural identity – and trust that, essentially, only whites will ever really be attracted to it. Misgivings about visual identifications would not then be the barrier to unity they are in a strictly racial movement. The very racial hardliners that make unity so difficult in a racial movement would also likely self-select out of a cultural movement, which would also ease the way to unity.

If you knew nothing about Silver’s past history, these comments would seem somewhat reasonable, even though we may disagree with the recommendations he makes. Unfortunately for him, some of us have long memories, and statements from him like “Although pan-European ideals hold some degree of personal appeal for me…” rank among the most dishonest in the history of the Internet.  Silver has been a bitter enemy of pan-Europeanism for the past dozen years, and has been mocking, attacking, and deconstructing pan-Europeanism, often in the most mendacious and or infantile fashion, ever since he started infesting the Majority Rights comments threads in the mid-2000s.

Regarding his contention that “Membership is decided by visual identification…” that may hold for the McCulloch faction, but many – most? – people in Der Movement go by ancestry.  For example, most people in Der Movement would reject a “Nordish” Jew, but accept a darker, swart cockney “Paleo-Atlantid” Englishman.

With respect to the main point that White unity in Der Movement will always be undermined by Nordicist hardliners who reject and exclude other Whites and by the reaction of those other Whites to that exclusion, I agree. My brief period of thinking that compromise was possible was wrong-headed delusion on my part; I can admit when I have been wrong, and I was wrong in that case.  If that makes some question my judgment, so be it.  Unlike Greg Johnson and the other Quota Queens, I’m not going to hide my errors in an attempt to safeguard others’ opinions of me.

Silver’s recommendations are flawed.  Cultural nationalism does not solve the race problem to everyone’s satisfaction; even if it are mostly Whites who are attracted to it, it still leaves the door open for mass “cultural conversion” and assimilation, attacking the foundations of racial preservationism. One solution, and that which I have advocated, is adding (not replacing) cultural factors to racial ones, instead of replacing race with culture, or vice versa – thus merging the Salterian and Yockeyian viewpoints (note I use Salterian not McCullochian – ancestry not phenotype).

Pan-Slavism has been, as Silver admits, a failure and a vehicle for Russian domination. Further, it can exhibit the same problems as pan-Europeanism. One can imagine neo-Nordicist North Slav types, such as the Polako and Raciology specimens, attacking “racially admixed” South Slavs and making a distinction between “True Slavs” (Poles, Russians) and “False Slavs” (Serbians, Bulgarians). Same problem, smaller scale.

Personally, I’m a pessimist, and believe that Der Movement has already ruined a viable chance at victory.  But, we can still try. What I advocate is that the small minority of activists who are pan-Europeanists (true ones, not Nordicists trying to expand their “D’Nations” base) cut loose from Der Movement and go their own way.

Pan-Europeanists should have their own groups, groupuscules, blogs, websites, organizations, meetings, etc.  They should build a New MovementThey should be hardliners themselves – absolutely eschewing, excluding, and rejecting all Nordicists, fetishists, HBDers and other dividers.  Now, there are possible problems here.  There are so few true pan-Europeanists that there may not be a critical mass for success.  From experience, I know that Nordicists and others of similar ilk will always try to weasel their way into pan-European groups, to subvert the mission and undermine activities. Conversely, there will be pan-Europeanists who will impatiently attempt to expand their influence by accepting these other types or at least by making “alliances” with them. These dangers will exist.  But if Type II pan-Europeanists can perform better than the Type I Nutzis dancing through cemeteries with their swastika-soled boots, then they can  provide an attractive, viable alternative to the failed “movement” and to the hardline dividers to whom Silver refers. A more successful and sane movement can attract high quality people, establishing a positive feedback loop of steady and sound growth, while leaving the failed “movement” to degenerate under the weight of its own failures and insanity.

Do I think this will occur?  No. I think the swastika-soled boots crowd will dance off into the sunset, tripping over a tombstone, hurdling headlong into the grave. The majority of rank-and-file activists – including many who call themselves pan-European – are slavishly addicted to Der Movement and will not break ranks with it until it is too late to do any good.

We’re very likely doomed.  You can’t say I haven’t warned you.  You can’t say that I haven’t been (constantly) offering you an alternative.  It’s been your choice to (constantly) reject that alternative.


I’d like to make one more important point.  If pan-Europeanism is so crazy and unrealistic, then why is that that you have Nordicists – Pierce and Duke being two prominent examples – who always seem to find it necessary to pretend to be pan-European?  I alluded to one possible reason above, the desire to maximize followers and followers’ donations. But I see three more fundamental reasons for this.  

First, although authentic pan-Europeanists are relatively few, they have an influence out of proportion to their numbers.  Consider Yockey – you have the hardcore ethnonationalists of Counter-Currents always promoting Yockey and his work, and the Nordicist National Alliance is now selling Yockey’s masterpiece Imperium. And all these types have not hesitated to make use of my own work in the past.  Second, although there is a significant and very loud hardline Nordicist faction as well as Nordicist-oriented rank-and-file activists, there is also a significant, more “silent,” fraction of activists who are at least vaguely sympathetic to pan-Europeanism, and who would be a mobilizable force with better (and more genuine) leadership.  Third, the White masses already think excluding even the Jews is nutty; thus, excluding Southern and Eastern Europeans would strike many of them as completely unhinged. Many of the things that are acceptable within Der Movement’s “amen corner” would not “fly” in the broader society. I understand the difference between descriptive and prescriptive, but if the prescriptive is derived from the counter-productive obsessions of a particular hardline faction, then perhaps the prescription needs to be re-thought.

Therefore, perhaps the problem is not with pan-Europeanism, but instead derived from the fact that the American “movement” had its genesis in Nordicism and Anglocentrism, amplified by the obsessions with Hitler and Nazi race doctrine, and so these paradigms are too deeply embedded within the Old Movement to be effectively opposed from within. The same holds for Old Movement dogma outside America, with Anglocentrism being of course prominent in the Anglosphere “movement,” and Hitlerian thought being prominent among activists in “Germanic” Europe.  However, that all applies specifically to Der Movement – the Old Movement – not to society at large, and not to the nucleus of activists who could, under the right circumstances, initiate the development of a New Movement.

But, again, I’m pessimistic. 

Another Grand Ethnonationalist Victory!

Sieg heil!

“…inevitably backfired…”

Inevitably?  Sure.  What with all of this Nordic Celto-Germanic Northern Italian competence and all, amplified by ethnonationalist superiority, what could possibly go wrong?  Hail Padania!  Hail Ethnonationalism!  Hail Victory!  Hail!

Zman:

Trump really is the quintessential Baby Boomer male. He made a lot of money, but will never have much to show for his time. Everything about Trump is wrapped up Trump the person, the selfish, boorish oaf living for the moment. When the wife got too old, he traded her in for a new one. When he hit middle-age, he bought a sports car and started dating young women. His story will be one of endless self-indulgence.

Zman’s buddy Greg Johnson argues that voters – including White evangelicals – voted for Trump purely based on his persona (as described here by Zman), and not his policies. The existential meaning of Greg Johnson is pure unadulterated dishonesty.

So much winning!  The future for White nationalism looks bright!  Following the brilliant guidance of our racially superior leadership, we’ve leveraged the 2016 election prudently to achieve a clear path to victory!  All that’s left for us is to dance through cemeteries wearing swastika-soled boots!  Hail!