Category: affirmative action

You Are All to Blame

Gross dysfunction in Der Movement enabled by all you Type I activists out there.

Read here, emphasis added:

Heimbach was charged with assaulting his wife and his wife’s stepfather, Matt Parrott, who is also co-founder of Heimbach’s Traditionalist Worker Party. The organization is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a new white nationalist group masking itself in “traditionalism.”
About 1 a.m. Tuesday morning, Parrott, 36, called police from a Walmart in Paoli, Ind., according to a police report obtained by the SPLC. Parrott told police he had fled to the Walmart with his stepdaughter after a confrontation with Heimbach, who had allegedly been involved in an affair with Parrott’s wife. The stepdaughter told police that the affair had lasted three months but had recently ended.
But that night, according to the police report, Parrott caught Heimbach with his wife. He confronted Heimbach and told him to get off his property, but Heimbach wouldn’t leave. Parrott poked his chest, then Heimbach allegedly grabbed Parrott’s hand and twisted it down. Heimbach got behind Parrott and “choked him out” with his arm, according to the police report.
Parrott told police he briefly lost consciousness. When he woke up, he again told Heimbach to get off his property, and Heimbach again tried to choke him, according to the police report. Parrott again lost consciousness, and upon waking up heard his wife tell Heimbach to track down his stepdaughter’s phone because it had a recording of Heimbach and Parrott’s wife together, according to the police report. Parrott and the stepdaughter escaped to the Walmart.
After police met Parrott at the Walmart, they left to track down Heimbach, and found him in a verbal confrontation with his own wife. Heimbach’s wife told police that her husband grabbed her face and “threw me with the hand on my face onto the bed.”

An analysis of the situation is here.

It goes without saying that I’ve been critical of Parrott for a long time, and once I learned about Heimbach’s antics, sharply critiqued him here.

Question: was there any leftist journalist “embedded” at the Parrott-Heimbach homestead to record all of this drama?

Another question: when are all you nitwits out there going to DEMAND an end to the travesty known as Der Movement, Inc?


The Present Puny and Worthless Race

Der Movement Stupidity.

I’m writing an important piece on “The Strategic Objective” (which will, of course, be completely ignored by Der Movement once posted here); in the meantime, some brief news.

Read this.

Ordinarily, I don’t link to Counter-Currents, but if Greg Johnson wants to do some of my work for me by discrediting the Beavis-and-Butthead Brigade, then link I will.  The problem with that is that Johnson doesn’t go far enough in his criticism, particularly self-criticism over the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations and his own hysterical, thin-skinned “banning” of anyone who has the temerity to hold him accountable for that (or for anything else). And his own feuding with Spencer (“no truce!”) has been one of the problems. 

Will Bolton’s book ever be mentioned at Counter-Currents?  I hope so; I hope anti-Arktos attitudes won’t get in the way of that.

But, hey, thanks Greg, for letting me know about Red Ice.  The disintegration of the Alt Right proceeds apace.

Johnson won’t tell you though that (despite negative attitudes toward Spencer since 2014 [at least]), Greg was all on-board with the “Alt Right brand” (big tent! big tent!) up until Hailgate and Feudgate, while I (and Strom) was opposed to Alt Right stupidity from the very beginning (and said so not only here but at Counter-Currents comments threads as well). All down the memory hole!


Is somebody monitoring these reporters when they are “embedded,” or are they just allowed to skulk around unsupervised? Has it crossed anyone’s mind that these snoops might be passing along intelligence to the ADL, SPLC, antifa, and law enforcement?

All true, but coming from someone who let Hermansson and Lewis “skulk around unsupervised” at “extreme vetted meetings” this is just a bit too much – chutzpah that goes beyond what one would find at a yarmulke factory.

A commentator writes to Johnson:

At this point, either Anglin is the leader of White Nationalism in America, or you and Anglin are

Cue snare drums and audience laughter.


…we need to penalize attention whores who are building their brands at the expense of the greater movement.

Yes, indeed, I agree completely.  Does Greg have a mirror handy?

White Nationalism 3.0 will be hammered out by Counter-Currents and advocates of American Nationalism like James Allsup, Identity Europa, Anglin & Weev, and Mike Enoch.

Gee, WN 2.0 didn’t last that long, did it?  We’re now getting ready for 3.0.  And look who Johnson thinks will be riding to our rescue. The complete lack of self-awareness is mind-boggling.  These guys couldn’t hammer their way out of a paper bag, much less hammer out an authentic movement. Where is Charles Martel (or Thor) when we need him?  Hammer away!

A commentator:

Tall, thin, attractive, Nordic, well dressed, are all words that come to mind when I think of these guys. This is where the American movement should be.

Sure, that’s the criteria necessary to decide who is appropriate.  After all, it has worked out so well before.  Bring back Patrik Hermansson!  I’m sure he’d like to help with future “extreme vetting.”  But, wait, you guys already have tall, thin, attractive Nordics like Mike Enoch, so you’re all set! 

It’s WN 3.0!  Or WN 30.0!  Or WN Googolplex.0!

These guys think all the iterations of WN are getting better.  They are wrong.  One is reminded of the age-old wisdom:

But Time, which wears out every thing, introduced a more degenerate Race; so that every succeeding Generation is grown more corrupt than the preceding, till we are dwindled down to the present puny and worthless Race.

Indeed.  WN 2.0, 3.0, ad infinitum. Whites as a whole, in fact.  By the way, the growing success of The Black Panther movie is in large part due to the White audience. “The present puny and worthless Race.”


Will these people ever go away?
Not as long as the movement lets a hostile press declare who our leaders are.


Will these people (including the WN 3.0 crowd) ever go away?
Not as long as the “movement” is dominated by Type I activists who practice ethnic affirmative action.

Now, for all about the Afrowops:

Leonard here basically moves into Farrell territory.

Looking at the trends you’d almost think the historically and genetically more germanic north had different instincts than the heavily mixed south.

Yes, because Salvini, just by looking at him, could easily be mistaken for Dolph Lundgren’s younger brother.

By the way, the Italian people would not be “ungovernable” if the worst 10-20% of the population (both north and south) was culled, leaving the more healthy elements behind.  The Campanian 5 Star hero Di Maio looks like a Pakistani for example (a handcuffed Greg Conte weeps softly).  And let’s not forget the northerners – the young Mussolini looked like the younger brother of General Mapache from The Wild Bunch. If that’s reflective of the underlying genetics then no wonder it’s “ungovernable.”  Why should the healthy 80-90% suffer because of a botched minority?

Roissy claims that some of his best friends are “pasta naggers.”  Fair enough.  After all, some of my best friends are cuck naggers, so it all balances out well in the end.

Another important step forward for The God Emperor!  Pepe (and Roissy) weeps.

The Dying Alt Right and Other News

News. Satire. It’s all one.

Is the Alt Right dying?

It is more and more looking like Sallis is going to be right once again, as I’ve repeatedly predicted that the fever dream (nightmare) of the Alt Right is going to end, sooner or later, but the speed of the collapse is even taking me by surprise.  The loss of Bristow is devastating, absolutely devastating.

And of course the anti-White scum crow in delight:

“Everyone in the alt-right is a malignant contrarian,” Lenz said about the growing divisions in their movement following the united front the alt-right displayed in Charlottesville. “They come from a culture where insults are the coin of the realm.”

But, but, but…I thought it was only “White Nationalism 1.0” that could be so categorized?  Oh wait, I was right about this as well, although that’s nothing, the equivalent of “being right” about stating that “the sun will rise tomorrow morning.”

The association of “the movement” with the Alt Right means that racial nationalism in America will be damaged (once again!) by this latest fiasco, proving right those who warned that a too-close association with racial nationalism with one relatively juvenile and inept faction will be the downfall of any progress made as a result of Trumpian chaos and balkanization.

Leave it to our fearless leaders to go from the (admittedly overwrought) euphoria of November 2016 to the grim ashes of March 2018.

I guess that whole Legion Europa thing looks at least a little bit better in hindsight, no?  But of course that project wouldn’t do, would it.  It just didn’t have “all the trimmings,” so to speak, right?

Enjoy the collapse. It’s a long way down.  

And you have no one to blame but yourselves.  A “movement” based on Type I leaders and Type I followers, in today’s age of 24/7 media coverage, social media, heightened analysis, sophisticated police state tactics, well-funded “watchdog groups,” organized Far-Left domestic terrorists enabled by TrumpCuck and HowdySessions, is destined to fail.  What’s needed is less Type I empty bravado and more Type II cunning and planning.

Read this.

My understanding of the situation is that this woman used her own photograph on her pseudonymous activist social media account, used a pseudonym that was slightly different from her real name (Tiana Dalichov vs. Dayanna Volitich), and discussed detailed aspects of her IRL job while essentially indirectly taunting her employers (Agreed with a guest that white supremacists need to infiltrate schools and become teachers and said, “I’m absolutely one of them.” Said on her podcast that she had put on a “dog and pony” show for administrators, telling her students that when administrators showed up, “I’m going to be different than I usually am. I just don’t want you to be shocked, I want you to play along.”).

So, yes, I agree, that must have been satire.  I mean, a serious activist with a podcast and a social media account wouldn’t have done all of that, would they?  Well, Der Movement as a whole is satire, so how could anyone tell the difference?

I’ve written about this before, but I would be a strong supporter of Pierce’s “table-leg therapy” theory if I was not such a committed pacifistic humanist. Emphasis added:

Table-leg Therapy
Senator Fulbright and the Reverend Berrigan are still on the wrong side of every issue except Palestine, and they are on the right side of that issue for the wrong reasons.
In other words, liberals — including the consistent ones — are just as sick as ever and just as dangerous to the future of America as ever. The only way the great majority of them will get their thinking straight, eventually, is with a sturdy, oak table leg applied smartly and repeatedly alongside the head.
Nevertheless, the present dissension in liberal ranks is of inestimable value. It is the most fervent and influential of the liberals who are now taking an anti-Zionist position, and their numbers and influence are growing daily.

Can we skip the optional Asian (girl) friend?

But, but, but…the great and good Desmond Jones says that Italy is absolutely ethnically homogenous and will remain so until the end of time, forever and ever, amen.

Solution: these Nigerians are actually Sicilians.  It’s the mafia after all, and, as we know, real Nigerians are actually lighter-complexioned, more gracile, and racially more European than are the Sicilian Afrowops.

Amren, Scot Peterson, and The Mangan Syndrome

Another “movement” error.

The Mangan Syndrome, named after Muscleman Mangan (The King of Whey) can be defined thus: When someone, particular in some precinct of Der Movement, publicly makes a factually incorrect statement with an attitude of complete smug self-assurance. Typically, the comment is not only factually incorrect but obviously so, something that could be identified as incorrect (or at best highly misleading) given a few minutes (or seconds) of online research (or simple reading comprehension).

The classic example was Mangans’s assertion that “most Italian-Americans are of Northern Italian ancestry.”  Another example from Der Movement is one I criticized here.

The latest example of this is Amren’s assertion that Florida (ex) deputy Scot Peterson is Black.

This is Scot Peterson.  Not very Negro.

Note that Amren post has to be from an archived source since they apparently removed the original once they found out they were wrong (days later) and, insofar as I know, they never admitted, much less apologized for, the error.

Now, I’m sure heavy breathing Type I’s will say “what’s the big deal?”

It is the same principle as to why people are told to make sure there are no spelling or grammar mistakes in their resume/CV/job application, college application essay, grant submission, etc.  If you are so sloppy, and have such a lack of attention to detail, in the small things, that is a warning that you’ll do the same for the big things.  If you can’t be trusted to get it right, find out the correct answer, and do your research for the small things, the same is likely for the big things.  If you cannot be trusted on the small things, why should anyone trust you on anything more important?

So, the same Amren that tells us that that a deputy named “Scot Peterson” is “Black” (How likely is it that a deputy named “Scot Peterson” is a Negro?  Didn’t any of these geniuses have enough sense to double check to make sure?  Apparently not.) based on this picture (obviously a fuzzy photo of a tanned White man) is the same Amren that peddles the pseudoscience of the charlatan Richard Lynn or which spreads misleading nonsense about Ancient Egypt.  

And the System uses these errors to smear ALL racialists and ALL nationalists as being “wrong” and “peddling pseudoscience” and “so blinded by hate that they can’t get their facts straight.”  

At some point, if there is never any accountability, how will the “movement” ever get on track?  Are these people even capable of admitting they are wrong?  Are they capable of admitting errors?  Can you trust anyone who makes such egregious mistakes and then doesn’t have the good grace, the character, to admit it?

And this is not specifically to “pick on” Amren, which has done, and continues to do, some good work, but it is illustrative of Der Movement as a whole.  It is also related to Der Movement’s solipsism, what I call The Lathe of Heaven Syndrome (many syndromes in Der Defective Movement – The Man on White Horse Syndrome being another), in which Type I activists believe that their very thoughts, their bombastic pronouncements, create reality. Things are because Der Movement says they are!  Ancient Egyptians were akin to Europeans – nay they were Nordics! – simply because Der Movement says so, the actual existing genetic evidence to the contrary be damned.

Once you lose people’s trust with sloppy errors and blatant falsehoods it will be very difficult, sometimes impossible, to gain it back.

Better not to make these errors to begin with.  And if an affirmative action leadership cannot refrain from error, then Der Movement had better rethink its quota system.

IQ and Leadership

Part of the explanation?

Why “movement” leaders tend to be, in general, incompetent mediocrities leads to a number theories.  There is of course Der Movement’s stringent ethnic affirmative action program. The dominance of Der Movement by Type I activists, who favor their own, for leadership, also is a factor.  Dissident movements tend to draw in marginal personalities, while the elevation of defective freakishness repels the less marginal; the lack of suitable candidates leads to marginal leaders. Leaders are almost always overt and public activists, typically attracting people who have “little to lose” IRL (unless they are trust fund babies or the retired wealthy).

Another mechanism is that even when other variables are controlled for, the perception (perception, NOT reality) of who is an effective leader is related to the leader’s IQ, but in a curvilinear and not linear fashion.  Thus, assuming an average IQ of 100, the peak for optimal perceived leadership is an IQ of 120 – not only are dumber people perceived as less effective, but smarter ones as well. One can theorize mechanisms for this phenomenon, but it is what it is.  Emphasis added:

Although researchers predominately test for linear relationships between variables, at times there may be theoretical and even empirical reasons for expecting nonlinear functions. We examined if the relation between intelligence (IQ) and perceived leadership might be more accurately described by a curvilinear single-peaked function. Following Simonton’s (1985) theory, we tested a specific model, indicating that the optimal IQ for perceived leadership will appear at about 1.2 standard deviations above the mean IQ of the group membership. The sample consisted of midlevel leaders from multinational private-sector companies. We used the leaders’ scores on the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT)-a measure of IQ-to predict how they would be perceived on prototypically effective leadership (i.e., transformational and instrumental leadership). Accounting for the effects of leader personality, gender, age, as well as company, country, and time fixed effects, analyses indicated that perceptions of leadership followed a curvilinear inverted-U function of intelligence. The peak of this function was at an IQ score of about 120, which did not depart significantly from the value predicted by the theory. As the first direct empirical test of a precise curvilinear model of the intelligence-leadership relation, the results have important implications for future research on how leaders are perceived in the workplace.

This may be another explanation for “movement” failure.  120 IQ people are intelligent no doubt, but have limitations.  Most prominent “movement” leaders would tend to be in this range (Hello Alt Right!  Hello Alt Wrong!) and more intelligent and capable people are weeded out (and for other reasons such as those discussed above).

But, but, but…”what about William Pierce?” Der Movement mutters.  There are those other variables to consider: “leader personality, gender, age, as well as company, country, and time fixed effects.”  Pierce benefited from ethnic affirmative action, although not particularly charismatic he had certain alpha male personality traits, he was tall and physically imposing, people respected him for giving up his academic career to associate with Rockwell, and there was a time/era effect – he came to prominence in an America more appreciative of the science/technical men; today’s Beavis-and-Butthead “movement” is unlikely to value an “egghead” physicist.

And consider Strom, likely equally intelligent, but never considered as leadership material even before his legal troubles.  Although ethnically acceptable, Strom’s personality and other traits could not compensate for a high-IQ (and likely contributed to a more negative view).  Gliebe was much more acceptable to the rank-and-file: how did that turn out?

Historically: Hitler was likely less intelligent than Goebbels, Mussolini less intelligent than Gentile or Evola, Codreanu less intelligent than Cuza, etc.  Francis Parker Yockey failed as a practical leader, and a careful reading of Coogan’s book suggests reasons why, some of which relate to Yockey’s own personality quirks and personal failings, but also because of jealousy over his obvious genius as well as the inability for him to effectively explain his concepts to the Type I riff-raff.

Getting around this problem would entail the high-IQ leader compensating like Pierce if possible, or surrounding himself with high-IQ advisers and listening to them, or a fundamental change in the “movement” that would allow it to overcome the societal prejudice against the higher-IQ.

In Der News, 2/20/18

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

If Romney is a sociopath, what does that make Trump?  Cuckadoodledoo!

The Chinese threat. Emphasis added:

Wray pointed to China’s use of unconventional intelligence sources as an example of its reach.
He said “collectors” — what the intelligence community calls people who collect intelligence on behalf of agencies or governments — had infiltrated US universities.
“I think in this setting, I would just say that the use of nontraditional collectors — especially in the academic setting, whether it’s professors, scientists, students — we see in almost every field office that the FBI has around the country,” Wray said.
They’re exploiting the very open research-and-development environment that we have, which we all revere, but they’re taking advantage of it,” Wray said, adding that there was a “naiveté” among academics about the risks posed by foreign nationals at US universities.
The Institute of International Education found that US universities admitted more than 1 million international students in the 2015-16 school year, nearly 329,000 of which were Chinese students.

That’s all true, but the infiltration of Chinese – and in general Asian – interests is not restricted to academia, or business.  As I have repeatedly warned here, they are infiltrating the “movement” through several weak points – “chinks in the armor” so to speak – including HBD and, of course, the sexual weakness of beta male Type I activists for the East Asian women who are pimped off on them.  Indeed, over the past few years, there have been an increasing number of East Asian and Hapa females (of course, females) settling down in various “movement” precincts, as well as White males (not men) in the “movement” not even bothering to hide – nay, at times, even celebrating – their yellow fever.

And getting back to academia, don’t forget the cogelites at GNXP telling us we need ”hundreds of thousands” of “high-IQ” Asian immigrants per year.  After all, who’s going to do STEM and staff our universities?  Certainly not low-IQ White lulzers, hiding out in their parents’ basements, engaged in fervent onanism to Asian porn.  

Will Sessions do this?  But, no.  He’s too “busy” uselessly standing around looking like a dumbfounded Howdy Doody. Trump had other (non-quota queen) choices for Attorney General, people who, while they were politically inferior to Sessions, would have actually done something, and that something would have been whatever Trump wanted.  Instead, we get Howdy Doody time, except the ventriloquist is missing and the dummy just flops around lifelessly.

A Positive Critique

Dominique Venner.
This book has already been reviewed at Amren, so instead of just repeating what has already been done, I’d just like to cite a few relevant points from this excellent book (highly recommended) and how these points fit in to some of the opinions promoted here.
Venner begins with outlining “the flaws of the nationalist opposition” (if he did so today, he would be termed “crazy and bitter,” as “punching right” is only allowed for affirmative action panhandlers); these flaws include (today’s equivalents in parentheses): ideological confusion (of course, the entire “movement”), conformism (Der Movement’s fossilized dogma), archaism (Nutzism, Traditionalism), opportunism (all Chiefs, no Indians, and all Chiefs with the tin cup out), mythomania (conspiracy theorists), terrorism (acting out), and anarchism (lulz lulz).
The section on “Revolutionary Theory” is standard fare and all good, and a wakeup call for those who believe that no firm ideological underpinning for activism is necessary.  Basing activism on vague ideas and “acting out” leads to the sort of weak-minded, Type I activists who turn traitor as soon as they meet that “one nice Black person” they heretofore stupidly believed could not exist (when you have a childish view of reality, all people are binned into rigidly Manichean categories of all good vs. all bad).
“Young Europe” – Venner calls for pan-European cooperation, against the division of narrow ethnonationalism. “Unity is indispensable to the future of European Nations.” Indeed, and that’s a key feature of my work over the last 20+ years, as opposed to the ethnonationalists and their publicly proclaimed dystopian vision of European nations ethnically cleansing each other.
The section “For a Man or an Idea” is an attack on what I call the Man on White Horse Syndrome, and is highly relevant in this the Time of Trump.  Venner writes: “Passive herds, expect their miracle men to fix everything. Even the smallest groups have their idols. The inevitable disappearance of the great men leaves the naïve embittered and discouraged.”  Sound familiar?  And then: “The Nationalist does not need followers but militants who are defined by their doctrine, not in their relation to a man.”  Indeed.  Anyone listening?
Venner criticizes the “Theatrical Revolutionaries” who are “enemies of the revolution.”  The part about “costumes” I will address below, but in general, this criticism is relevant to all the Nutzis who ruin us all – Type I dimwits.  Venner talks about “Zero plus Zero” – in other words, grouping zeros together just gives you a bigger zero (the history of Der Movement, Inc.).
With respect to Venner’s criticism of “costumes”-  I both agree and disagree.  It depends upon context and what kind of “costume” one is talking about. Should activists dress up like Nazis?  Strut around with swastika armbands and SS uniforms?  Of course not.  Should they take the Alt Right and Alt Lite course of action, and appear at rallies like refugees from a cosplay convention, aping Captain America and Batman?  Certainly not.  Should they wear uniforms when simply interacting with normal people or going “undercover?”  Of course not.  Compare Joe Tommasi, who stopped dressing up Nazi like he did at first and “went native” as part of his guerilla war program, to the costumed Nutzis who eventually killed him.
Having said all of that, there is nothing wrong with uniforms per se, when attending certain types of meetings, or attending public rallies, or when engaged in more overt action.  There are benefits of wearing uniforms: for esprit de corps, discipline, professionalism, etc., these benefits are well known, which is why they have been used for military and paramilitary groups throughout civilized history. There is a history of uniformed paramilitary political solders in virtually every (ex)-Western nation, including America and the Silver Shirts.  Tasteful, utilitarian, culturally endogenous, and non-nutty uniforms are fine – better than the cosplay crew, better than the Nutzis, etc.
Lastly, Venner talks about “Division of Labor and Centralization” – people should do the tasks to which they are most fit, and propaganda needs to be local if possible: “…the propaganda branch should be able to rapidly supply material adapted to local groups, rather than over-generalized and locally irrelevant material.”  In relation to this, see some of my criticism of the National Alliance here.
Yes, you can have, as Venner suggests, a centralized leadership, but the actual “field work” has to be properly local and decentralized.  When activists need permission from “the National Office” to use the rest room, then nothing gets done.  The unwillingness of Pierce to allow local units to create and distribute their own propaganda specifically suited for local conditions and local current events was a terrible error, as much strategic as tactical.  All sorts of explanations were given (“quality control” and “we want to recruit people who understand the big picture and who are not merely emotionally excited about some local event”), but one suspects it was as much about maintaining tight control and the exercising of power, as well as maximizing National Office income (local units actually had to purchase the propaganda material they were to distribute!) as about anything else.  You know, it would still have been possible for the National Office to (quickly) review and approve (or suggest changes in) locally produced material – so the first objection falls flat.  As far as the second objection goes – there is nothing wrong with leveraging local conditions and current events to bring your group and its ideology to the attention of prospective recruits, one can always cull the herd once people are initially brought in, most likely only the truly dedicated will join an overtly public racialist group anyway, and by focusing on local conditions and events, you let the people in that locale know that you understand them and their problems, and that you are there to help – it’s a two-way street, not merely a bigwig somewhere trying to pad their membership rolls in order to boost monthly dues income.  So, the second objection falls flat as well.  Venner was correct: propaganda should be both general and local; if it is just extremely generalized it becomes stilted and stale, and puts too much of a distance between the prospective activist and the organization.  Idealism is great and should be paramount, but one cannot eat Idealism, and Idealism alone will not protect a community from the Colored hordes and their Levantine masters.  Idealism has to be built upon a foundation of pragmatic activity and real-world concerns.  Once you take care of the latter, then you can indulge the former.
In summary, the problem with important books like this is that they get no serious attention from the “movement.” I’ve seen this again and again.  Yes, sometimes such books are discussed and favorably reviewed.  Some people say, yes, yes, we need to follow this advice, and then with the short attention span of the Type I retards, all is forgotten, and all just falls back to “business as usual” – the default setting of “movement” dysfunction wins again.
Expect more of the same with this book.
Was Venner’s suicide at least in part motivated by a realization of the utter failure of the “movement?”  It was about 50 years from his book to his death – what had been accomplished?  Did anyone listen to what he wrote?  What has happened since his death?  We have now the Alt Right making a mockery of serious nationalism, flouting many of the suggestions Venner made.
Perhaps it is time for a Negative Critique?