Category: Alt-Right

Spencer Video: 9/20/17

Good video.

Watch this.

I agree, petty nationalist ethnonationalism is a zero sum game, and ethnonationalists really do not understand how their vaunted “sovereignty” is guaranteed by other, larger powers.  In a future ethnonationalist Europe, who will guarantee the sovereignty of, say, Estonia?  Yes, I guess Estonia could develop their own little nuclear arsenal (*), but, really, the existence of an ethnonationalist Estonia would be guaranteed by whatever security arrangements exist among European states, which means they would give up some sovereignty for a collective defense arrangement.

Also, Spencer’s overall take on foreign affairs is simply good common sense.  It’s a shame Spencer is wasting himself with the Pepian Alt Right jackasses.

*Actually a good idea.  I’m a pro-proliferationist.  More nuclear weapons – at least in the hands of sane states – can help keep the peace.  And each nation that has such weapons should be upgrading, not downsizing.  The American trend of fewer such weapons, and smaller yields (no, against extreme hardened targets or large “soft” targets, “improved accuracy” cannot compensate for popgun sized yields), is madness.

Advertisements

Der Movement in Der News, 9/19/17

Dumb and useless Right.

That folks are willing throw away money on an execrable piece of filth like Derbyshire tells you all you need to know about why Whites are in steep decline.  If you are going to donate, give to Counter-Currents, for example. It’s clear I disagree with them strongly on some issues, but at least it is a pro-White, intellectually sound site.  Derbyshire is the opposite of that.

Yeah, Trump “resisted” – the far-left, White-hating, cuck buffoon signed it, didn’t he? Yegads, the delusional Trump worship on the Right knows no bounds.  Trump can make a speech announcing that there are too many Whites in America and that he’s sending out death squads to cull the White herd, and the fanboys will mumble about “4-D chess” and how Trump is nobly “resisting” pressure, since after all, he’s only going to kill most White Americans, not all of them. The lickspittle Trumpism from the Right does nothing but continue to discredit our cause. 

Truth be told, many on the Right are more concerned with defending their majestically obese hero Trump than with defending their own ethnic genetic interests.  Truth be told, if Obama had signed this resolution, the usual suspects would be screaming “White genocide.”  Truth be told, continued Trump worship goes beyond bad judgment and now delves into the realm of some sort of sick masochistic homoerotic obsession.

What’s the Alt Right going to do?  The fundamental basis of its entire ideology is under attack.

The Roaches Get Ready To Scurry

Pathetic obese, Jew-connected cuck.

Amnesty, courtesy of the Cuck Emperor.  Fake “border security” in exchange for amnesty – where have we ever heard that before?  Yeas, that’s right – the other “man on white horse” hero, Ronald Reagan.  Behold treason:

That bill would offer a path to citizenship to hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants brought to American as children who graduated high school or obtained a GED and pursued higher education, served in the military or worked lawfully for several years.
The meeting comes one week after Trump announced plans to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and surprised Republicans by cutting a deal with Democratic leaders on hurricane relief, government funding and extending the nation’s debt limit.
The dinner also followed a flurry of bipartisan meetings at the White House. Trump, at a meeting with moderate Republicans and Democrats Wednesday afternoon, pushed for action on a legislative fix for DACA, but supported pairing it with border security, according to Rep. Kurt Schrader, D-Oregon.
It’s unclear how far any agreement can proceed on Capitol Hill without buy in from Republicans controlling both chambers.
In a statement Wednesday following a DACA meeting between Pelosi, House Speaker Paul Ryan and other top lawmakers, Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said GOP leaders believe “any solution needs to address border security and enforcement, which are the root causes of the problem. Discussions among the Republican conference will continue in the coming weeks.”

Good to see Ryan is further to the right than Trump on this.  But, hey, look at the Antifa issue – Pelosi is further to the right than Trump.  It’s not really hard to be on Trump’s right these days.  Even Karl Marx could probably manage it.

Antifa good, White patriots bad:

The White House signaled that President Donald Trump plans to sign a joint resolution passed by Congress Tuesday condemning white supremacists, neo-Nazis and Ku Klux Klan members in the wake of violence sparked by a white nationalist rally last month in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Let this all come to pass, and I WILL hold the “movement” accountable for its blind Trump worship, its endless bad judgement and obsessively repeated “man on white horse” escapades, its fervent embrace of ethnic affirmative action, and its patent dishonesty in refusing to acknowledge its error with Trump.  I’ll wait.  The other shoe will drop soon enough.  Meanwhile, enjoy the spectacle of Roissy’s homoerotic fervor, sweatily writing about Trump’s “compliance game” and “poon commandments,” while Alt Righters scribble about “4-D chess,” and the Alt Wrongers, like roaches exposed to light, scurry away to their HBD hovels.

I’ll wait.  And when the far-left, anti-White, omega male cuck Trump unleashes betrayal on the base, Der Movement will be exposed, at least here, as the travesty it really is.

A Failed Brand

Against the Alt Right.

My view is that we should abandon the Alt Right “brand” entirely. It only functioned when it was sufficiently vague to allow there to be a conversation between White Nationalists and people who were closer to the mainstream, which allowed White Nationalists to make converts and build connections. But Andrew Anglin and Richard Spencer have pursued a strategy of polarization between the Alt Right and what is now called the Alt Lite that has deprived the term of its original utility. So they can keep it.

Readers of this blog are aware that I have never been a supporter of the “big tent” approach.  Nevertheless, it must be said that the only way that approach would have worked for the “Alt Right brand” was if it was always made explicitly clear that the Alt Right was nothing more or less than an umbrella group of various disparate rightist factions: hardcore White nationalists, ethnonationalists, Identitarians, Alt Lite civic nationalists, Alt Wrong HBD “race realists,” more extreme Paleocons, Game-Manosphere types, Southern nationalists, etc. Unfortunately, that approach was incoherent from the very beginning.

At the same time the “big tent” approach was promoted, we were also being told that “the Alt Right is the movement” and “the Alt Right is White nationalism” and “the Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all.” Then came Hailgate, the continued identification of the Alt Right with its more “extreme” elements, and the fallout ensued.

Thus, hardcore White nationalists resented being lumped together with civic nationalist cucks, execrable HBD specimens like Derbyshire, homoerotic Trump fanboys and other hedonistic “game” “pussy nerd” nihilists, and all the rest.  Likewise, various non-WN Alt Right factions resisted association with “racist Nazi haters,” or anyone who dared to offend Jews or Orientals, or any “blackpiller” who dared to criticize “God Emperor” Trump.  And of course, besides these serious ideological splits, there were those who objected to having the “movement” conflated with the Alt Right’s juvenile jackassery (politely called by the euphemism “youth culture”), and so there was a generational split as well.

Predictably – and some of us, predictably, did predict it – the “shotgun marriage” of the Alt Right fell apart.  The Alt Lite tried to take the brand for themselves; failing that, they dissociated themselves from the Alt Right proper (which returned the favor), less “extreme” Alt Wrong elements “threw Spencer under the bus” after Hailgate, there were personal feuds between various racial nationalist/Identitarian/ethnonationalist factions of the Alt Right, and so there has been significant degeneration of the “brand” from its heyday of 2016.

What is the Alt Right now?  White nationalism Lite?  Racial nationalism for Millennials? Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism?  The vanguard of the Iranian Renaissance?

While my reasons differ from those of Greg, I mirror his call for the rest of you folks to abandon the Alt Right brand.  Indeed, with analogy to the “only Nixon could go to China” meme, it would be optimal if Spencer himself would abandon the Alt Right brand, allowing for a “re-set” that hopefully would include lessons learned from errors made by the Alt Right.

In Der News: 9/10/17

News, news, news.

Also see this.

And then we have this.

The pivot could also be reflective of the new environment Trump created in the West Wing after dismissing divisive, nationalist figures like former chief strategist Steve Bannon. With Bannon gone, the more moderate faction of the West Wing, consisting of New Yorkers like economic adviser Gary Cohn and senior adviser Jared Kushner, will likely hold more sway over the president’s decisions. 

Jewish liberalism in control.  “4-D chess,” indeed!

 

First, I was warning about “Vox Day” on my blog long ago.  Right again.

If opposition to the mixed economy and the welfare state is not an essential trait of the Right, then what is? On this matter, I follow Jonathan Bowden, who argued that the essence of the Right is the rejection of egalitarianism as the highest political value.

Agreed.  That’s good sense and any reasonable interpretation of political history.

I also think there is something slightly absurd about debating whether a world-historical phenomenon like National Socialism merits being included in a contrived, ephemeral, marginal, and increasingly ridiculous category like the Alt Right. It is like debating whether King Lear merits being classed among Saturday morning cartoons.

Well said.

My view is that we should abandon the Alt Right “brand” entirely.

Of course, I agree, but for different reasons than Greg, and this is something often discussed here and need not be gotten into with this post.

Are We Getting Closer To Being Checkmated?

Is Trump “playing 4-D chess” against his own base?

Read this, emphasis added:

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Thursday that she believed President Trump would sign a DREAM Act legalizing young unauthorized immigrants after her meeting with him Wednesday.

“The president both yesterday in the meeting and today made it very clear he wants Congress to act, to get this done,” Pelosi told reporters.

Pelosi added that Trump wants border security measures attached to any bill focused on the immigrants, but that “it does not include a wall.”

The best description of Trump from AltRight.com comments: “instinct without intellect.”  The man has no core, he cannot be trusted, my own instincts about him are proven correct time and time again, and I will hold Der Movement responsible for their irresponsible “man on white horse” worship of this vulgar ignorant buffoon.

We Need Real Data

This is important.

This is a topic that I’ve brought up in comments at Counter-Currents, particularly in response to some Le Brun podcasts, but is worth discussing again (and again and again).

We need data, strong empirically-determined data, to assist in understanding racial-social trends in society as a whole, as well as within the “movement.” Many assumptions are made, and strategic approaches are designed based on those assumptions, without any real founding on real evidence. This is crucial in determining the answers to crucial questions about how to get Whites in general motivated to pursue their own racial group interests, and how to get Whites actively involved in racial activism.

We need opinion polling and other types of survey data, looking at the White population (in different countries if possible, but at least in the USA), broken down, if possible, by age, sex, education, income/class, and other variables. We need to ascertain how many Whites are concerned about the racial-cultural trends, and if so why, and if not why. We need to understand why those who are concerned do nothing about it, why they eschew racial activism, and what they think of the “movement.” Looking at the “movement” we need to identify the types of Whites who get involved, what their motivations are, how they got involved, and whether the “gateway hypothesis” (that people enter through more mild, Alt-Wrong style activism and the progress to the more hardcore) is correct or not. We need to understand whether ”mainstreaming” really works (I think not), whether “vanguardists” are more attractive or not to recruits, and whether the Alt Right’s “youth culture” is really a net positive to the “movement” and whether it is really responsible for bringing in young recruits. And there are, I’m sure, dozens of other essential questions that need be answered – and answered by real data.

Why don’t the more well-funded and “connected” precincts of the Right (e.g., the Alt Wrong) at least get the ball rolling on this? Or, if not them, can the more hardcore among us pool resources and get the job done?

Real data providing real answers leading to real solutions to pressing problems.