Category: Alt-Wrong

Another Movement Lie About Race

Endless lies from the fundamentally dishonest Type I Nutzis of Der Movement.

Not surprisingly, this latest lie comes from the Alt Wrong.

Alexander and his men captured much of Asia and left behind blond, light-skinned descendants…

That concerns the Kalash, a South Asian people long the target of fascination from sweaty ethnic fetishists.

The reality, emphasis added:

The Kalash represent a unique branch in the South Asian population tree and appear to be the earliest population to split from the ancestral Pakistani and Indian populations…Whereas the Kalash have recently been reported to have European admixture, postulated to be related to Alexander’s invasion of South Asia, our results show no evidence of admixture.

Outright lying by Der Movement is nothing new.  Two relatively recent examples that I exposed:

Note the second “They Wuz Dumb” lie is from the same “Sinclair Jenkins” lying to you about the Kalash.  A particularly unfortunate specimen, no?

The facts that refute “movement” lies can be easily found with only a few minutes of online searching. That the “movement” nevertheless persists in lying to you tells you all you need to know about its mendacity (or stupidity or laziness).

Summary: Lie, lie, lie…all they do is lie.  Do you think they are being honest with their HBD pseudoscience either? 

Advertisements

Brain Disorders and Genetics

All in the genes.

Read here; emphasis added:

Disorders of the brain can exhibit considerable epidemiological comorbidity and often share symptoms, provoking debate about their etiologic overlap. We quantified the genetic sharing of 25 brain disorders from genome-wide association studies of 265,218 patients and 784,643 control participants and assessed their relationship to 17 phenotypes from 1,191,588 individuals. Psychiatric disorders share common variant risk, whereas neurological disorders appear more distinct from one another and from the psychiatric disorders. We also identified significant sharing between disorders and a number of brain phenotypes, including cognitive measures. Further, we conducted simulations to explore how statistical power, diagnostic misclassification, and phenotypic heterogeneity affect genetic correlations. These results highlight the importance of common genetic variation as a risk factor for brain disorders and the value of heritability-based methods in understanding their etiology.

One can speculate whether these “common variations” differ in frequency among various ethnic and racial groups and the relationship between that and “cognitive measures.”   And such “measures” need not only be IQ.  Perhaps one day we can measure genetic links to creativity or to hypocritical dual morality hyper-ethnocentrism.  Perhaps the Alt Wrongers can productively speculate which groups’ “stereotypes” of being low and high, respectively, in those metrics would be most likely supported by genetic studies.

Saint Francis the Prescient

It all sounds familiar.

Read here. Emphasis added.

I have just returned from the Convention in Los Angeles. I see now why you did not feel any urge to go. You already known, apparently, that which I had to find out—viz. that the movement in this form and under this leadership is devoid of a future. 

Hey, that sounds like Ted Sallis talking about Der Movement. Inc. Was Yockey “crazy and bitter” as well?  Dementia praecox, indeed!

The magazine, the newsletters, the World New Service which Lohbeck and I are founding—these indeed are valuable, but of themselves they are not politics. At most they are useful adjuncts to politics.

I met Smith—in company with his wife and with Lohbeck—and he delivered a speech at the lunch table. He had not read Imperium nor the London “Proclamation,” because, as Lohbeck tells me, he reads nothing. 

Sounds like Trump.

Immediately after the speech, Smith delivered one of his own, attacking me, and saying that Americans love democracy, that he would not unite with me in my hatred of the Jew…

Was Smith a HBD race realist Alt Wronger?

…nor in my love for the Western Civilization, but only in the principles of Jesus Christ. Exactly what that means I do not know, but perhaps it was only a way of calling attention to the fact that I had not mentioned Christ. The entire Convention was primarily Christ and Christianity, and secondarily anti-Jewish, mostly on the basis that the Jews are anti-Christ.

Christianity – or, should we say, Christinsanity – must be mercilessly destroyed.

Such morbid suspicion could arise in a case like Elmhurst’s, for he has indeed suffered long and hard persecution, and he lives in the environment of New York, where, he says, Jews are constantly trying to poison him. 

Oy vey!  Don’t eat those gelfite fish!

I thought that you should know these things, for the future.

Yockey’s future is our present.  Nothing much has changed in the ludicrous clownshow of the “movement,” has it?

I do not believe Elmhurst did much damage to the relations between Smith and me, since I believe Smith’s attitude did not change, that he is not yet ready for the kind of political thinking that I brought to him, and that, in any event, he is not political. In his beliefs, he is undoubtedly sincere, but in his actions, so to speak, he is not. His person, his family—in every speech he mentions his wife, mother, and father at least ten times—“the clean loins of my father, and the pure womb of my mother who carried me,” etc.—and himself at least thirty times—his security, physical and financial, are of the very highest importance to him. He lacks entirely what we call in Europe the heroic world-outlook. He explained to the audience at one point that he does not live in St. Louis because there was a plot to kill him in St. Louis, and that under these conditions, his mother could not visit him in his home, nor could he enjoy peace and quiet with his wife. One of the strong points which he makes to his audiences is that he and his wife are as happy a couple as could be found in America. In the closing speech of the Convention, he talked for four minutes about his stomach, his digestion, and the fact that he does not need to take laxatives.

Being around the “movement” for any length of time should sufficiently sicken anyone so that they will have a copious gastrointestinal flow without the need for any laxatives.

Jews and other guks who tried to intervene were silenced by the audience. Guk, by the way, is our new word for anyone who does not belong to the white race and Western Civilization. It is our word corresponding to the Jewish word Gentile or goy—any non-member. It is the word American soldiers use to designate all Koreans, north and south. Gannon will introduce the word in England, and it must enter all languages.

Behold the Guk

It is time to reintroduce this Yockeyian term.

Jews and other guks who tried to intervene were silenced by the audience. Guk, by the way, is our new word for anyone who does not belong to the white race and Western Civilization. It is our word corresponding to the Jewish word Gentile or goy—any non-member. It is the word American soldiers use to designate all Koreans, north and south. Gannon will introduce the word in England, and it must enter all languages.

This term has its derivation from Korean cuisine.

Thus, American soldiers of human (i.e., European) ancestry used that word to describe all Koreans (classifying by race, not by official “friend” vs. “foe”), and Yockey thought it a useful term to describe the Other.  I suggest we reintroduce this to racial nationalist terminology.  Given that it was originally used as a pejorative distinction toward Northeast Asian cogelites, and then specifically used in this context about Jews, use of the word “guk” has an added benefit of “sticking it” to the Alt Wrong/Alt Yellow HBD “yellow supremacists” who also happen to be pro-Jewish as well.  Thus, we distinguish the real Far Right from milquetoast milksops who worship at the Altar of Asia and at the Altar of the Yarmulke. The term also “sticks it” to the yellow fever masochistic Silkers and their Asian female “handlers.”

Silk Road Spying

Another helpful Silker.

The Justice Department announced today that Jerry Chun Shing Lee, 53, of Hong Kong, was indicted by a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Virginia with one count of conspiracy to gather or deliver national defense information to aid a foreign government, and two counts of unlawfully retaining documents related to the national defense…

…Lee is a U.S. citizen who speaks fluent Chinese.  According to the indictment, Lee was a case officer for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) until 2007.  After leaving the CIA, Lee resided in Hong Kong.  The indictment alleges that in April 2010, two Chinese intelligence officers (IOs) approached Lee and offered to pay him for information.  The indictment alleges that Lee received taskings from the IOs until at least 2011.  The taskings allegedly requested that Lee provide documents and information relating to the national defense of the United States.  According to the indictment, the IOs provided Lee with a series of email addresses so that he could communicate covertly with them.  The indictment further alleges that Lee prepared documents responsive to the taskings, made numerous unexplained cash deposits, and repeatedly lied to the U.S. government during voluntary interviews when asked about travel to China and his actions overseas.

In August 2012, Lee and his family left Hong Kong to return to the United States to live in northern Virginia.  While traveling back to the United States, Lee and his family had hotel stays in Hawaii and Virginia.  During each of the hotel stays, FBI agents conducted court-authorized searches of Lee’s room and luggage, and found that Lee was in unauthorized possession of materials relating to the national defense.  Specifically, agents found two books containing handwritten notes that contained classified information, including but not limited to, true names and phone numbers of assets and covert CIA employees, operational notes from asset meetings, operational meeting locations and locations of covert facilities.  Agents also found a thumb drive on which was stored a document later determined to contain information classified at the Secret level.  During voluntary interviews with the FBI, Lee admitted preparing the document in response to taskings from the IO.

What’s the problem, Amren?  Lee is an East Asian cognitive elitist?  Who would you rather have working in US national security – greasy Romanians dancing the hora (long may it turn) or even greasier low-IQ Afrowops?

Bunker Syndrome Redux

An example of leftist hypocrisy as well.

Some time ago, I wrote about “The Bunker Syndrome,” an affliction that characterizes many Whites of rightist inclinations. You have White folks with healthy instructs about race and culture, but they are unwilling to actually do anything productive about it.  Rather than attempting to actualize their beliefs in the real world, and engage in activism, they’ll just spout some “bigoted” remarks, or “act out” in public, accomplishing nothing except making themselves (and others who share their beliefs) look bad.

Let’s consider this situation.  Yes, a New York lawyer named “Aaron Schlossberg” raises questions as to his ancestry – or should we say (((ancestry))) – but that’s irrelevant to the main issues at hand.  Ignore that Levantine possibility for the time being, and let’s look at this through the paradigm prism of “a ‘White’ person making rightist, politically incorrect comments.”

Now, the persecution of Schlossberg is wrong, but his behavior is a perfect example of The Bunker Syndrome – lots of loud “acting out” of “bigoted” opinions but no actualization of his views in the real world.  Indeed, we read, emphasis added:

The website for Schlossberg says he is a lawyer with a focus on commercial and insurance law and notes that he speaks Spanish and some French, Mandarin Chinese and Hebrew, in addition to English. His law office advertises that it can take phone calls in four foreign languages, an irony that was not lost on many commentators on social media.

If Mr. Schlossberg feels so strongly about the sanctity of public English speaking, then perhaps his law office should only have accepted phone calls in that language?  More to the point, if he feels so strongly about immigration, illegal immigration, immigration enforcement, rightist politics, and cultural preservation, then, instead of public displays of Bunkerism, he could have used his legal training to help those on the Right, instead of practicing “commercial and insurance law” for a “vibrant” clientele.  Even if he didn’t want to help any “anti-Semitic Nazis” there are those on the Right who would welcome him – indeed, the Alt Wrong would much prefer a New York lawyer named “Aaron Schlossberg” over some greasy low-IQ Afrowop or some Romanian dancing the hora (long may it turn).  Then there is the whole Alt Light, the Paleocons, and the Donald Cuck administration.  There’s a wide range of opportunities for someone with legal training to help the Right, instead of acting like a jackass in a restaurant.

This is the problem with all the “Bunkers.” They’ll say this or that but not actually DO anything productive in the political or metapolitical sphere to advance their beliefs.  In fact, their “acting out” typically has the consequences (apart from harming themselves) of delegitimizing their beliefs and generating (undeserved) sympathy for the targets of their ire.  They are not even helping to promote racial balkanization, since their behavior is a dead end resulting in the aforementioned sympathy for their targets, and embarrassment for those who share their basic beliefs.  There is no real “heightening of the contradictions” here.  That Black guy who walked into a restaurant with a MAGA hat and got harassed actually did more to promote balkanization than did Schlossberg yelling about calling ICE on some Spanish speakers.

In comment threads in articles about Schlossberg, one sees the typical leftist mantra that spews forth when anyone with rightist sympathies is subjected to oppressive social pricing: “free speech has consequences” and “free speech protections of the First Amendment only refer to a lack of government persecution and have nothing to do with private consequences” etc.  These same leftist hypocrites (redundancy) were silent however when Fresno State claimed an inability to discipline NEC land whale Jarrar due to…drum roll please…free speech and the First Amendment.  And keep in mind Jarrar’s antics not only included the public comments about “amazing racist” Barbara Bush but also the incident with the ASU hotline number.  Consequences for any of that?  Absolute zero. Consequences for Schlossberg expressing his private opinion in a private setting?  Kicked out of his office and having elected officials submitting complaints for him to be disbarred.  

There are some on the Left who call those on the Far Right “hypocrites” on the free speech issue because, as they say, “if you guys were in charge, you wouldn’t allow free speech.”  Of course, leftists accusing others of hypocrisy is breathtaking….well, hypocrisy, as well as an insane level of projection.  But as to the “accusation?”  Fair enough…if I were in power, I wouldn’t allow free speech for the Left; they would be silenced just as they now silence the Right.  But it is not “hypocrisy” because a Sallis State would not pretend to be a “democracy” with a “First Amendment” and would not engage in dishonorable cant about “freedom” to justify interfering with the sovereignty of other nations. A Sallis State would also not cherry-pick law enforcement nor would it engage in cowardly techniques of social pricing (also applied in a cherry-picked, inconsistent manner) in order to evade the letter and spirit of the law.

The Left does not respect freedom of expression in the context of a “democracy” centered on a “Bill of Rights” (and Europe is even worse).  So, why should they expect the Far Right to respect freedom of expression in a national socialist authoritarian state?  Are they delusional or merely retarded?

In any case: if there are rightist lawyers (or other useful professionals) out there, please learn from the Schlossberg case.  We don’t need more Archie Bunkers.  The Bunkers didn’t save America from being transformed and destroyed.  We don’t need you spouting off in a restaurant, we need you in a courtroom (or wherever your skills can be best utilized) advocating for the Right.

Amren 2018

Some comments.

Over 250 people gathered at the beautiful inn at Montgomery Bell State Park to hear from an exciting group of speakers. Though antifa promised to “smash” the conference, police and park rangers had clearly learned from the mistakes of Charlottesville. Courteous and professional officers kept antifa well away from us, and there were no confrontations. Anyone who stayed inside the conference center could barely even see, let alone hear, the 30 or so protesters. Police and park rangers set objective rules to allow both our guests and our opponents to exercise their First Amendment rights in the best traditions of our country. We are deeply grateful to the state of Tennessee for protecting the conference while enabling protesters to express themselves peacefully.

The police didn’t strictly enforce the anti-mask law in all cases, but, all in all, they did a credible job.  At some point though, the Right needs to protect their own conferences.

There were foreign press and two documentary crews at the conference, but we kept out dishonest, flagrantly hostile media. Both Huffington Post and Vice wanted to cover the conference, but they can be counted on to slant their coverage to the point that the event would be unrecognizable, and—even worse—they have doxed people. Audience security comes first.

I’ll give Amren credit for being wiser than others on the Right in this regard.  Apparently, some standards (other than: are you a Swedish homosexual?  Are you an embedded Norwegian journalist?) were applied.

This conference showed a striking unity of theme throughout the weekend, as speaker after speaker emphasized the need to learn from mistakes…

Apparently, there will be many opportunities for learning.

Unfortunately, the reaction may not be quick enough, and whites could suffer the fate of the American Indians or the Australian Aborigines. “If you don’t or can’t stand up for your interests, very, very bad things happen to you,” warned Mr. Davies. “That is the nature of human society and human history.”

The “White Man’s Disease” in a nutshell: the unwillingness or inability to defend and promote your own group interests.

Mr. Davies therefore argued that white advocates must think very seriously about how they present themselves. He acknowledged that in the “soft totalitarianism” in the West, there is no way to be involved in this cause without sacrifice. Like dissidents in Eastern Europe, we must accept the fact that many sympathizers are too intimidated to come forward, and white advocates must think very hard about whom to attract. “We need to inspire and win over the best people in our societies,” said Mr. Davies, “and we are not going to do that by behaving in a fashion that attracts only the mob.”

You mean like Charlottesville Ragnarok?

Mr. Davies warned against the “Marxist fallacy” that history will break our way without anyone taking action or making sacrifices. We must also not make excuses for flawed leaders simply because they have thrust themselves forward. 

Yes. Mr. Davies, meet Der Movement, Inc.  Meet many of the people at the very conference at which you made this excellent comment.

He expressed amazement that white advocates seem to hold leaders to lower standards than those they set for themselves.

So, if Davies says that, he’s wise; if Sallis says that, he’s “crazy and bitter.”  Affirmative action once again.  Want better leaders?  Ditch the official Der Movement Ethnic Affirmative Action Program.  But, I have to say, given the people – the “leaders” – speaking at this conference, Davies’ comments either reflect sarcastic irony or a stunning sense of self-awareness.  Some of the biggest failures of leadership shared the podium with him.

Mrs. Brimelow noted that both American Renaissance and VDARE.com have a proven record of accomplishment.

At what? Panhandling?

As regards Derbyshire, check out the comments thread for a debate about his presence at the meeting, as a speaker no less, and the misguided idiots defending this grotesque monstrosity.

One of my sanctimonious critics in Der Movement (someone who, by the way, has also sharply criticized Derbyshire and Derbyshire’s supporters yet spoke at this conference along with Derbyshire) labeled me a “low information moralizer” because I had the temerity to suggest that it would be good for the “movement” if he ended his childish feud with Richard Spencer.  But if we want to see some real low information moralizers, check out the fools defending Derbyshire in the comments thread.  Apparently, they believe the only issue is Derbyshire’s Chinese wife and half-Asian children.  Perhaps if they had ever bothered reading this blog, they could have made the jump to being high information moralizers. Let me help.  

First, Derbyshire not only engages in miscegenation, but he is a fervent supporter and promoter of the practice, vehemently debated Taylor in favor of it, and threatened violence against anti-miscegenation individuals who emailed him about it (i.e., “come over to my house and I’ll greet you in an appropriate manner,” or something to that effect – all at VDARE).  The pro-Jewish Derbyshire wrote an offensive “hit piece” against Kevin MacDonald, labelling MacDonald “the Marx of the anti-Semites” and that certainly did not help MacDonald, who at that time still had an ongoing academic career and was subject to intense pressure over his views.  Derbyshire did not take a “financial hit” because of defending pro-White positions – he was let go from National Review because of a self-serving essay he wrote warning his half-Asian children to beware of Blacks; I label that essay self-serving because it was part of his ongoing attempts to normalize his family to White conservatives, dividing Americans between “Black vs. non-Black” instead of “White vs. non-White,” and that his mixed children will be considered “White” by Blacks.  Derbyshire was then welcomed with open arms by Der Movement (he’s English after all), and has been invited to speak at Amren conferences, despite previously attacking Amren conference attendees (you know, the cucks who now applaud him) by agreeing to their characterization as “latrine flies.”  Derbyshire consistently labels “racial purists” as “nuts” and is not a pro-White activist but a HBD race realist/cognitive elitist.  And I won’t even get into his atrocious comments about child porn.  In my opinion, Derbyshire is a despicable excuse for a human being, it is hard for me to think of anyone in any way associated with the “movement” that I loathe more, and I have zero respect for any of his supporters and enablers, anyone who invites him to be a speaker at meetings, anyone who has him as a writer and/or podcaster for their sites, or anyone who shares a podium with him at a conference.

Several years ago, Johnson came out against Amren meetings and the time and money spent on them; now he attends and this year was actually a featured speaker.  Not wanting to be a “low information moralizer” I won’t speculate as to why Johnson gets to speak and not Spencer, whether the lack of Spencerism was a lack of interest from the Amren side, or from Spencer himself (or both).  I will note that Amren’s attacks against Spencer for “Hailgate” and alleged anti-Jewish attitudes is curious since Counter-Currents is no friend of the Jews, features positive articles on Hitler, and Johnson has been quoted as making “anti-Semitic” comments himself (“Jews have to leave America,” etc.).

As far as Dickson goes, after reading his interview, to me he’s just another “movement” apparatchik. A dime a dozen.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.