More items. In all cases, emphasis added.
Amren commentator – Trump is the anti-Teddy:
rls976 stmariz2 • 20 hours ago
Trump speaks loudly but carries a twig
Hey, Roissy, are you paying attention?
Question for the Alt Wrong: If, as you claimed, Trump was “the last chance for White America” and if, as you claim today, he is a do-nothing fraud and swindler, then what now?
The FBI under Trump: Proud Boys BAD, Antifa GOOD. With Sessions gone, can we now talk about Antifa Don, as opposed to Antifa Jeff?
The rules, as currently written, are designed to protect the Left. Antifa gets police protection at riots, because the cops know the dissidents would tear the spaghetti armed Antifa boys to shreds, if given the chance. Everywhere you look the system is rigged to protect the Left and make it difficult for dissidents to mount a challenge.
Well, yes, that’s obvious, and has long been that way. Very well. But now the “God Emperor” is in charge of the federal government, of law enforcement, and the System’s pro-Antifa bias is stronger than ever. That is what one would expect with Antifa Don in charge, a far-left effeminate, obese, and vulgar anti-White radical. Make Antifa Great Again!
And it’s another great moment in Der Movement history. But let us give Spencer some credit: At least, unlike some other people, he does not use his children as fund-raising props, a behavior that is in my opinion indescribably inappropriate.
Yeah, Richie, you were real prescient and all. And this blog – EGI Notes – was saying that Trump was a fraud, a Negrophile, a Jew-lover, and a vulgar, ignorant, buffoon, long before the election. I guess it is time to establish the Crazy and Bitter Ted Twitter Account – and start broadcasting my ultra-prescience to the masses, eh?
See this. Apparently, things have changed since the time when Russian soldiers would strip Italian POWs naked in the snow and pour ice water over them. Of course, the Afrowops invited such contempt because of their pitifully pathetic military performance in WWII. To the extent that that performance was not inherent in the Afrowop biological character, Mussolini has much blame there. Fascism was in power for nearly twenty years when Italy entered WWII, and after all that time the population (such as it was) was not in any way radicalized, the military was ill-trained and ill-equipped, and sending such specimens to the Eastern Front was akin to sending Pee Wee Herman to compete in a Mixed Martial Arts event. Il Duce did complain that he was like a sculptor with no stone to work with – that the poor human material of Italy’s population left him with little to do anything grand with. To the extent that is true, he should have realized that, and either not gotten involved in the war, or at least only participated with limited contingents of the highest quality Italian soldiers, equipped and trained as best as possible, rather than with a general mass enlistment force. A more focused group of soldiers may have demonstrated a credible military performance. And, if the population was as bad as he said, he should have concentrated on eugenics and racial hygiene rather than blustering and war, and should have “fascistized” the existing population so as to extract from them the best performance possible – instead of being an Italian Trump with all blustering talk and no real action.
High-T Quota King Coulter – mudshark Annie herself – mocks Trump. Gee, what ever happened to In Trump We Trust?
1. This post. You know, every time the “more variation within than between” nonsense is trotted out, the sly implication is to suggest to people that “within” is always within races. But my post shows that this applies to ANY grouping of people. However, the between racial differences are above and beyond the random genetic variation that exists, proving the biological validity of race. In other words, there is just as much (if not more) “within group” variation for mixed groups of Whites and Blacks as there is within separated groups of Whites or groups of Blacks, but the between group variation is maximized when comparing the separate groups of Whites and Blacks.
2. Genetic interests are based on genetic kinship, which itself is based upon relative genetic similarity or difference. Genetic kinship and genealogy track to an imperfect degree (as both Sailer and I agree). So what? A random co-ethnic may share more genes with you than your fourth cousin. Again, so what? If anything, it proves how closely co-ethnics can be genetically related. And there is no difference, objectively speaking, between identity by state and identity by descent. Identical is identical. If two gene sequences are the same then they are the same regardless of why they are the same.
3. And, yes, it is possible for a European descendant of Charlemagne to have zero genes directly derived from Charlemagne. But guess what? They will be more genetically similar to Charlemagne than is a Nigerian. Guess what racial group Otzi the Iceman clusters with? Hint: It is not Negroes or Orientals. Genetic kinship is not the same as genealogy, and as a proponent of EGI, I’m concerned with genetic kinship.
So…A woman is told that (from the NY Times article that Breezy Steve links to):
Johnson’s father, a chauffeur who later became a superintendent at a housing project in North Philadelphia, had a golden-brown complexion. Her mother, who said her own father was a white Brit and her mother was half African-American and half Native American, was light-skinned. People sometimes mistook Johnson’s mother for white, and when she applied for seamstress jobs at department stores in the 1920s and ’30s, she chose not to correct them.
She tests out as between 43-45% sub-Saharan African, which seems to me to be fairly accurate (as Sailer agrees). What’s the problem? The sickness of the SJW System is such that when genetic testing confirms race and demonstrates reasonable accuracy, the hysterics moan about “problems” and “inaccuracies.” Likewise, when genetic analysis refutes Kemp on Ancient Egypt, the equally sick and hysterical “movement” says that the same analysis “proves Kemp was right.” Both the System and Der Movement are frauds when it comes to racial science and racial history.
Well, when Roissy declared Salvini “the Italian Trump,” I guess he was right:
A young Somali refugee, who has just been granted refugee status, has been arrested on suspicion of raping a 68-year-old woman as she sunbathed on a beach in Abruzzo, Italy.
And, hey, according to the great and good Sir Desmond Jones, Italy is 100% ethnically and racially homogeneous to the end of time, forever and ever, amen. After all, Afrowops, Somalis, what’s the difference?
Hey, be careful there Hunter, you might get banned from Counter-Currents. Don’t you know you are not supposed to challenge Greg too vigorously? He’s already previously more or less called you “crazy” (*) and then wrote that your site was “black-pilling” (bitter); you may be next on the blacklist:
Posted November 19, 2018 at 2:58 pm | Permalink
Billy Roper purity spiraled his way out of it.
He didn’t trust Jason Kessler. He didn’t like a variety of people who were scheduled to speak there. He didn’t trust the plan. You can say he opposed it for the wrong reasons, but it is unfortunate that Jacob Goodwin went and will be paying the price for years. There were a lot of WN 1.0 guys besides Roper who thought it was naive to hold such a large rally.
That’s correct. Roper was right. Why can’t Johnson give Billy credit for that? Both Roper and Johnson were skeptical about Unite the Right. As was I – neither WN 1.0 nor WN 2.0 – by the way. So, three people, with three different “movement” ideologies, all thought the rally was stupid. Who thought it was a good idea? All the heroic Millennials of WN 2.0. Let them assume the responsibility for that. It’s called accountability. Try it some time.
* In the comments thread of the above-linked article, Johnson wrote (about Wallace):
Moreover, this individual had also been committed to a mental institution and diagnosed as bipolar and schizophrenic…and during this psychotic episode (the one that he will admit to), he blogged about going to work for the SPLC.
If memory serves, Johnson later had Wallace as a podcast guest.
Finally, Greg Johnson and I are in complete agreement on something:
Posted March 20, 2011 at 1:47 pm | Permalink
I am not a defeatist, but I do think that unconscious defeatism is a factor when movement people demand less competence and responsibility from so called leaders than they demand from their car mechanic. After all, a brake failure is serious. A failure of movement leadership . . . well, one would think that much more serious, since we are concerned with the preservation of our whole race. But the fact that people treat it far less seriously indicates that they really don’t think that the movement can accomplish its aims under any circumstances.
Greg seems “crazy and bitter” there – “blackpilling” – and should therefore ban himself form commenting at Counter-Currents.