Category: Asian immigration

Arrogant Asians and Brexit

Typically breathtaking Asian arrogance.

In a recent issue of Science (a leading scientific journal with a definite leftist slant), there was an anti-Brexit article, on how Brexit is casting a “pall” on British science.  Well, all no surprise, but what caught my attention was the photograph accompanying the article.  The picture showed two “young pro-EU campaigners” protesting Brexit in London by holding up a sign saying: YOU STOLE OUR FUTURE.

Who were these protesters?  A South Asian female and an East Asian female.  Well then! That basically summarizes the problem with the EU, doesn’t it – the EU being an organization that promotes the interests of everyone in Europe except for native Europeans.  Maybe, just maybe, native Europeans want to determine their own destinies, without pushy aliens dictating to them and attempting to shame them.

The arrogance of those two female coloreds is breathtaking.  These invaders – who are not racially or culturally European, do not belong in Europe, and whose presence there is actually stealing the future from native Europeans and their posterity – have the goddamn nerve to whine that their futures are being “stolen” by the dastardly indigenous people of Britain who had the temerity to stand up for their own interests.  These Asians have chutzpah as the Jews would say, or, more vulgarly, “they have big balls.”

Here’s some advice to these invasive filth: you can take back your futures by going back where you (or your invading ancestors) came from, and leave native Europeans the right to their own future in their own homelands, thank you very much.

Asians – a people whose existential meaning is hatred of Whites.
Advertisements

Der Movement in the News, 6/15/16

Several items, with a concentration on HBD: Jews, Breezy, gamesters.

Tim Wise: Jews gonna Jew.

Steve Sailer: HBDers gonna HBD.  Breezy’s article isn’t up yet, but I’ll take this opportunity to once again state my opinion that the Johnson-Reed Act (which is what I presume Breezy will talk about) was a good idea, although the major rationale was preserving ethnic balances, not proximate issues (which are of course important also).

In that spirit, I’ll also state my support for another example of a majority acting firmly, an example of which I’m sure Breezy and the other HBDers would rather like to ignore.
Here’s an amusing comment:

(((Ivanka Trump)))

(((Michael Cohen)))

(((Sidney Adelson)))

(((AIPAC))

CONDI for Veep

(((DONALD TRUMP)))

CH founded by (((…)))

Part of the Grand Strategy of Asians

Pimping out the Asiatrices.

Did the Chinese actually sell their daughters in 1978? Are we talking wives or prostitutes?


What about today?

Look, even though many Asian men do not like it, a part of the grand strategy of Asians, as a race, is to pimp out their females to White nerds, so as to facilitate the Asian colonization/infiltration of the West.
Fact is, the Asiaphilia common to Whites is almost exclusively found among White males (not men), and no doubt there is a “yellow fever” connection to it. Even among the Right, one can look at HBDers, some of whom are/were married to Asiatrices (Derbyfogle, Murray, Brand), and so-called “pro-White” sites that include female (of course) Asian bloggers, sites that promote Asian colonization of White lands as part of what we can call “Silk Road White nationalism.”
And among the White masses, the male fetish for Asians dampens White resistance to Asian immigration and upward mobility; note with all the hysteria about Trump and his plans for Mexicans and Muslims, no one critiques the Asian invasion of White lands.

Different Kinds of Security Risks from Chinese Immigration

Various types of security risks.

This ostensibly reasonable post by Derbyshire poses some problems.

I suppose that my suggestion to bar persons with China connections from sensitive national-security work will seem outrageously shocking to many; perhaps doubly so as I myself have such connections. Should I be barred from access to sensitive data? 

Yes, I think I should. I have publicly expressed fondness for my Chinese relatives. It would be reasonable for an investigator, on learning that, to suppose that threats to my relatives in China might be effective in “turning” me.

That’s great. Let’s take it further. Having someone with such “connections” is a security risk in Der Movement and associated precincts, such as the anti-White HBD cult and “immigration patriotism.” Why only talk about risks to The System? What’s the difference? One can argue that the immigration of “Rosie” to the West is a security risk because it affects Derbyshire’s influence over racialist discourse, with all the damage that does to interests of value to “latrine flies.” Speaking of interests, note that The Derb only talks about narrow proximate concerns, and not about the damage done by Chinese immigration to White American ethnic genetic interests, nor about the damage done to the cultural/civilizational organic solidarity of the nation and its identity.


Also note the picture accompanying the article. Was The Derb only “teaching English” to Chinese females?


HBD, HBD, HBD marches on.

Sidenote: This is exactly one of the reasons some of us find Derbyshire so annoying – his hypocrisy. Except for the one time he should have mentioned it but did not (the essay attacking MacDonald), Derbyshire is always, constantly talking about his “Chinese connections” and his mixed marriage. It is seemingly his favorite topic, particularly if one includes not only his work at VDARE, but his writings elsewhere, as well as his personal website. He seems to derive satisfaction “tweaking the noses” of the “race purists” by making his private life a public spectacle. But, on the other hand, he acted as the outraged family man on VDARE, concerning emails allegedly received from skinhead types critical of his family. How dare they! And then Derbyshire “invites” them to come to his home, so he can “greet them in the appropriate manner.” Derbyshire himself makes an issue over his “Chinese connections” and then in that VDARE post exuded SJW rage because others mentioned it. That is like Ted Cruz’ plastic anger over people like Trump and cartoonists mocking the Cruz family that Ted himself intentionally uses as props in his campaign (note to Brimelow: using your children as VDARE props is not fair to them). Or, it is like the White women who demand that White society smile benignly on, and fawn over, their inter-racial relationships and mulatto children. If you choose to make the private public, then you have to acknowledge that not everyone is obligated to approve of your private choices. If you cannot acknowledge that, then keep the private private.

Meet Edward Lin

More Asian perfidy.


Why should anyone be surprised?  Why should anyone doubt that Asians will “pull a Pollard” and demonstrate that blood is always thicker than “citizenist” civic nationalism?

Asians are the enemy, potential traitors one and all, and having them in the US military is akin to the RAF recruiting fanatical German Nazis during the Battle of Britain.

Asians HATE, HATE, HATE Whites, they hate America, they hate the West. All of this should be obvious to anyone who has even just an ounce of common sense.

Trump Race Cucked Again

A supporter of “skilled” immigration.

Trump is once again backtracking on an immigration flip-flop, this time on the H-1B issue.  Even the flip-flop is not sufficient (see below). Hey, Touchback, we do NOT need “high-skilled” immigration. As VDARE has pointed out over and over again, the USA has a STEM surplus, not a shortage.  We do NOT need more White-hating Asians displacing White Americans in STEM.  Instead, maybe there’s a shortage of real estate moguls in the USA – plenty of those in China no doubt!  Let them all in!  Maybe there’s a shortage of reality TV show hosts.  Let’s have more!  And certainly we can use more ignorant, loud-mouthed, Negro-loving buffoons running for President while pretending to be on the “right.”  Also: if Der Touchback can be so easily confused by “blood running out of everywhere” Megyn, how is he going to fare debating Sir Hillary, queen of carpet munching?  Assuming of course that Clinton is not indicted, as she should be.  One wonders if Trump could actually out-debate Biden (assuming Joe is a late 2016 candidate addition replacing jailbird Clinton) – that would certainly be a duel of wits between unarmed opponents.
And, no, mop-head (*) Brimelow – apparently another affirmative action case with a reading comprehension problem – Trump did NOT correct himself “again” on skilled immigration:

Megyn Kelly asked about highly-skilled immigration. The H-1B program is neither high-skilled nor immigration

In other words, part of Trump’s opposition to H-1B is that it is not “high-skilled” (**) implying that Trump is still supporting “skilled” immigration.  Where in his clarification does it say that he is opposed to such an influx?  As far as I can see, Trump still supports Asiatics displacing Whites, as long as the Asiatics are “high-skilled” and (permanent) immigrants – and not “short-term cheap replacements” (being long-term, less cheap replacements is, of course, somehow better, right Touchback?)..
It’s a good thing the System is still bashing Race Cuck Trump as  a “fascist racist sexist etc.” or else his utility for balkanization would be fading away right now.
Of course, if elected, his penchant for flip-flops raises the question of what happens when he remembers to tell us that his “beautiful wall” is going to be on the Canadian border and not on the Mexican one.
*Perhaps the usual VDARE panhandling can be for the purpose of paying for Pete’s haircut.
**If I remember correctly, Derb’s illegal immigration to the USA was via H-1B, which would underscore the unskilled nature of such invaders.

Who Would You Support?

After the last post’s unbridled humor, we now become serious.
See this.  Who would you support there?  The Russian Slavs or the bizarre alien yellow hordes, chanting swarming insects, part of the world of color, a rising tide of color, ready to submerge the White race?   I would support the Russians.  Others who call themselves “White nationalists” would support the Chinese.  There lies a division that can never be plastered over – a division between racial patriots and Asiaphilic race traitors. Note the brief clip starting at 7:00 in that video – that’s what some heavy breathing perverts say will be the future “border guards of the West.”  I mean, you just can’t make this stuff up.
Let’s consider some excerpts from Stoddard’s The Rising Tide of Color, which are relevant here.

It all comes down to a question of self-preservation. And, despite what sentimentalists may say, self-preservation is the first law of nature. To love one’s cultural, idealistic, and racial heritage; to swear to pass that heritage unimpaired to one’s children; to fight, and, if need be, to die in its defense: all this is eternally right and proper, and no amount of casuistry or sentimentality can alter that unalterable truth. An Englishman put the thing in a nutshell when he wrote: “Asiatic immigration is not a question of sentiment, but of sheer existence. The whole problem is summed[Pg 276] up in Lafcadio Hearn’s pregnant phrase: ‘The East can underlive the West.’”[166] Rigorous exclusion of colored immigrants is thus vitally necessary for the white peoples. 


Exactly. What kind of lunatic would want Asian colonies in White lands?

Unfortunately, this exclusion policy will not be easily maintained. Colored population-pressure is insistent and increasing, while the matter is still further complicated by the fact that, while no white community can gain by colored immigration, white individuals—employers of labor—may be great gainers and hence often tend to put private interest above racial duty. 


Yes, indeed, and not only “employers of labor.”  Stoddard couldn’t envision the day when White “men” on the Right would call for an Euro-Asian alliance based on their “measured groveling” to their Chinese wives, or their prurient fantasies about gun-toting Chinatrices.

Barring a handful of sincere but misguided cosmopolitan enthusiasts, it is unscrupulous business interests which are behind every white proposal to relax the exclusion laws protecting white areas.


That was then, this is now.  Today, we add HBD nerds, sexually frustrated masochists, and other flotsam and jetsam.  There is of course Jews like Hart; thus, while Daniel S accuses me of being a “troll for the Jews,” he himself advocates multiracial White separatism (sic) just as do Jews.

Indeed, Californian assertions that Oriental immigration menaces, not merely the coast, but the whole continent, seem well taken. This view was officially indorsed by Mr. Caminetti, Commissioner-General of Immigration, who testified before a Congressional committee some years ago: “Asiatic immigration is a menace to the whole country, and particularly to the Pacific coast. The danger is general. No part of the United States is immune. The Chinese are now spread over the entire country, and the Japanese want to encroach. The Chinese have become so acclimated that they can prosper in any part of our country…. I would have a law to register the Asiatic laborers who come into the country. It is impossible to protect ourselves from persons who come in surreptitiously.”[180]


And we won’t be able to protect ourselves from persons we invite in, either. Now the following is directly relevant to Daniel’s “border guards” idea.  After all, we’ve seen all of this before:

 Asia’s perception of what the war signified in this respect was instantaneous. The war was not a month old before Japanese journals were suggesting a relaxation of Asiatic exclusion laws in the British colonies as a natural corollary to the Anglo-Japanese Alliance and Anglo-Japanese comradeship in arms. Said the Tokio Mainichi Deupo in August, 1914: “We are convinced that it is a matter of the utmost importance that Britons beyond the seas should make a better attempt at fraternizing with Japan, as better relations between the English-speaking races and Japan will have a vital bearing on the destiny of the empire. There is no reason why the British colonies fronting on the Pacific should not actively participate in the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. Britain needs population for her surplus land and Japan needs land for her surplus population. This fact alone should draw the two races closer together. Moreover, the British people have ample capital but deficiency of labor, while it is the reverse with Japan…. The harmonious co-operation of Britain and her colonies with Japan insures safety to British and Japanese interests alike. Without such co-operation, Japan and Great Britain are both unsafe.”[184] What this “co-operation” implies was very frankly stated by The Japan Magazine at about the same date: “There is nothing that would do so much to bind East and West firmly together as the opening of the British colonies to Japanese immigration. Then, indeed,[Pg 292] Britain would be a lion endowed with wings. Large numbers of Japanese in the British colonies would mean that Britain would have the assistance of Japan in the protection of her colonies. But if an anti-Japanese agitation is permitted, both countries will be making the worst instead of the best of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. Thus it would be allowed to make Japan an enemy instead of a friend. It seems that the British people both at home and in the colonies are not yet alive to the importance of the policy suggested, and it is, therefore, pointed out and emphasized before it is too late.”[185]


Thus, a White-Yellow alliance means aggressive Yellow colonization of White lands (not the reverse of course – that would be “racist colonialist imperialism”).

The covert threat embodied in those last lines was a forerunner of the storm of anti-white abuse which rose from the more bellicose sections of the Japanese press as soon as it became evident that neither the British Dominions nor the United States were going to relax their immigration laws. Some of this anti-white comment, directed particularly against the Anglo-Saxon peoples, I have already noted in the second chapter of this book, but such comment as bears directly on immigration matters I have reserved for discussion at this point.


Anti-White abuse.  Why not?  The existential existence of colored peoples is denial of, and opposition to, the West, as Yockey indicated.

Our own acute labor shortage during the war, particularly in agriculture, led many Americans, especially employers, to cast longing eyes at the tempting reservoirs of Asia. Typical of this attitude is an article by Hudson Maxim in the spring of 1918. Mr. Maxim urged the importation of a million Chinese to solve our farming and domestic-service problems. “If it is possible,” he wrote, “by the employment of Chinese methods of intensive farming, to increase[Pg 294] the production of our lands to such an extent, how stupendous would be the benefit of wide introduction of such methods. The exhausted lands of New England could be made to produce like a tropical garden. The vast areas of the great West that are to-day not producing 10 per cent of what they ought to produce could be made to produce the other 90 per cent by the introduction of Chinese labor…. The average American does not like farming. The sons of the prosperous farmers do not take kindly to the tilling of the soil with their own hands. They prefer the excitement and the diversions and stimulus of the life of city and town, and they leave the farm for the office and factory…. “Chinese, imported as agricultural laborers and household servants, would solve the agricultural labor problem and the servant problem, and we should have the best agricultural workers in the world and the best household servants in the world, in unlimited numbers.”[189] Now I submit that such arguments, however well-intentioned, are nothing short of race-treason. If there be one truth which history has proved, it is the solemn truth that those who work the land will ultimately own the land.


Please read that last paragraph again. The situation is perfectly analogous: those who guard the land will ultimately own the land.  Daniel’s ideas, however “well-intentioned,” are nothing short of race-treason.