Category: behold the female

The Betas Karamazov

Psychosexual insights from a Russian classic.

“The Battle of the Sexes” is fundamentally important for racial activism, particularly since we have White Knighting activists who expend their political capital on ditzy female airheads.

Now, before someone accuses me of hypocrisy by using “game” analyses here, let me remind you that I’ve always maintained that, as regards sex, “game” is essentially correct in the descriptive sense.  By opposition to “game” is prescriptive. In other words, I see the gamesters as correct in their description of women and of the sexual marketplace, but I disagree with their prescriptive suggestions on how men should behave based on these realities.

Thus, we can analyze a few characters of The Brothers Karamazov through the lens of sexual realism.

A “game” evaluation of the major female characters has already been done by someone else, and I see this analysis as sound.

The Wikipedia description of those characters are as follows (emphasis added):

Agrafena Alexandrovna Svetlova (a.k.a. Grushenka, Grusha, Grushka), a beautiful 22-year-old, is the local Jezebel and has an uncanny charm for men. In her youth she was jilted by a Polish officer and subsequently came under the protection of a tyrannical miser. The episode leaves Grushenka with an urge for independence and control of her life. Grushenka inspires complete admiration and lust in both Fyodor and Dmitri Karamazov. Their rivalry for her affection is one of the most damaging factors in their relationship. Grushenka seeks to torment and then deride both Dmitri and Fyodor as a wicked amusement, a way to inflict upon others the pain she has felt at the hands of her “former and indisputable one”. However, after she begins a friendship with Alyosha, and as the book progresses, she begins to tread a path of spiritual redemption through which emerges hidden qualities of gentleness and generosity, though her fiery temper and pride are ever present. 

Katerina Ivanovna Verkhovtseva (a.k.a. Katya, Katka, Katenka) is Dmitri’s beautiful fiancée, despite his open forays with Grushenka. Her engagement to Dmitri is chiefly a matter of pride on both their parts, Dmitri having bailed her father out of a debt. Katerina is extremely proud and seeks to act as a noble martyr, suffering as a stark reminder of everyone’s guilt. Because of this, she cannot bring herself to act on her love for Ivan, and constantly creates moral barriers between him and herself. By the end of the novel, she too, begins a real and sincere spiritual redemption, as seen in the epilogue, when she asks Mitya and Grushenka to forgive her.

Thus, typical young women: cruel, capricious unpleasant, arrogant, shit-testing, and we see that  Dostoevsky falters in his story-telling when he has both characters show “redemption” toward the end of the book.  In reality, both would have continued their behavior until their looks failed, at which time they’d find some beta male to parasitize off of (“marriage”) complete with nagging and general nastiness (“married life”).

Let’s now consider the main male characters, along with their Wikipedia descriptions (emphasis added).

Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov is the father, a 55-year-old “sponger” and buffoon who sires three sons during his two marriages. He is rumored to have fathered an illegitimate son, Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov, whom he employs as his servant. Fyodor takes no interest in any of his sons, who are, as a result, raised apart from each other and their father. The relationship between Fyodor and his adult sons drives much of the plot in the novel. 

Dmitri Karamazov

Dmitri Fyodorovich Karamazov (a.k.a. Mitya, Mitka, Mitenka, Mitri) is Fyodor Karamazov’s eldest son and the only offspring of his first marriage, with Adelaida Ivanovna Miusov. Dmitri is considered to be a sensualist, much like his father, spending large amounts of money on nights filled with champagne, women, and whatever entertainment and stimulation money can buy. Dmitri is brought into contact with his family when he finds himself in need of his inheritance, which he believes is being withheld by his father. He was engaged to be married to Katerina Ivanovna, but breaks that off after falling in love with Grushenka. Dmitri’s relationship with his father is the most volatile of the brothers, escalating to violence as he and his father begin fighting over the same woman, Grushenka. While he maintains a good relationship with Ivan, he is closest to his younger brother Alyosha, referring to him as his “cherub”.

Fyodor the father and Dmitri the eldest son, the rivals for the “affections” (sic) of Grushenka, are both complicated characters.  Although they both – particularly the father – have some of the “dark triad” traits so believed by the gamesters, ultimately both  men are hardcore Betas – pussy pedestalizing obsessives, with infinite fucks given (IFG) – contrary to the assumed zero fucks given (ZFG) attitude of the Alpha – with a case (particularly for Dmitri) of “oneitis.”  Thus, both men are easy prey for the malevolent Grushenka, playing with them in the same manner that a spiteful (female) cat would torment a mouse.  Thus: Fyodor and Dmitri: Beta Males.   They are both classic Roissyite Gamesters as well: IFG pussy pedestalizers, making their entire lives revolving around women.

Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov (a.k.a. Vanya, Vanka, Vanechka) is the 24-year-old middle son and first from Fyodor’s second marriage to Sofia Ivanovna. He is disturbed especially by the apparently senseless suffering in the world. He says to Alyosha in the chapter “Rebellion” (Bk. 5, Ch. 4), “It’s not God that I don’t accept, Alyosha, only I most respectfully return him the ticket.” From an early age, Ivan is sullen and isolated. His father tells Alyosha that he fears Ivan more than Dmitri. Some of the most memorable and acclaimed passages of the novel involve Ivan, including the chapter “Rebellion”, his “poem” “The Grand Inquisitor” immediately following, and his nightmare of the devil (Bk. 11, Ch. 9). Ivan’s relationship with his father and brothers are rather superficial in the beginning. He is almost repulsed by his father, and had no positive affection towards Dmitri. While he doesn’t dislike Alexei, he didn’t have any deep affection for him either. But towards the end of the novel, his relationship with his siblings gets more complicated. Ivan falls in love with Katerina Ivanovna, who was Dmitri’s betrothed. But she doesn’t start to return his feelings until the end.

Ivan – rebellious, intellectually dissident, cold – is closest to being an alpha in the book, but his “oneitis” for Katerina Ivanovna and his “brain fever” – a sign of weakness – classify him as a Beta, a high Beta, but a Beta nevertheless.

Alexei Fyodorovich Karamazov (a.k.a. Alyosha, Alyoshka, Alyoshenka, Alyoshechka, Alexeichik, Lyosha, Lyoshenka) at age 20 is the youngest of the Karamazov brothers, the youngest child by Karamazov’s second wife and thus Ivan’s full brother. The narrator identifies him as the hero of the novel in the opening chapter, as does the author in the preface. He is described as immensely likable. At the outset of the events, Alyosha is a novice in the local Russian Orthodox monastery. His faith is in contrast to his brother Ivan’s atheism. His Elder, Father Zosima, sends him into the world, where he becomes involved in the sordid details of his family. In a secondary plotline, Alyosha befriends a group of school boys, whose fate adds a hopeful message to the conclusion of the novel.

With respect to being an Orthodox novice, and his spending more time with young boys (maybe he should have become a Roman Catholic priest?) than young women, Alexei is MGTOW.  However, when he does interact with women, he typically does so in a bashful, clumsy, hand-twisting manner.  Hence, Alyosha = Beta.

Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov, widely rumored to be the illegitimate son of Fyodor Karamazov, is the son of “Reeking Lizaveta”, a mute woman of the street who died in childbirth. His name, Smerdyakov, means “son of the ‘reeking one'”. He was brought up by Fyodor Karamazov’s trusted servant Grigory Vasilievich Kutuzov and his wife Marfa. Smerdyakov grows up in the Karamazov house as a servant, working as Fyodor’s lackey and cook. He is morose and sullen, and, like Dostoyevsky, suffers from epilepsy. The narrator notes that as a child, Smerdyakov collected stray cats to hang and bury them. Generally aloof, Smerdyakov admires Ivan and shares his atheism.

Pavel is a MGTOW Omega male.  At his best, he’s a low Beta.

Father Zosima, the Elder Father Zosima is an Elder and spiritual advisor (starets) in the town monastery and Alyosha’s teacher. He is something of a celebrity among the townspeople for his reputed prophetic and healing abilities. His popularity inspires both admiration and jealousy amidst his fellow monks. Zosima provides a refutation to Ivan’s atheistic arguments and helps to explain Alyosha’s character. Zosima’s teachings shape the way Alyosha deals with the young boys he meets in the Ilyusha storyline.

The character of Father Zosima was to some extent inspired by that of Saint Tikhon of Zadonsk.

Father Zosima as an Elder monk is obviously MGTOW.  Before entering the monastery, as a young man, he was somewhat similar to Ivan Karamazov, a high Beta with some Alpha traits. More importantly, the “all responsible for one another” philosophy of Father Zosima, as well as the outlook of Alyosha (the author-proclaimed “hero” of the novel), is that if Dostoevsky himself.  This is a form of Russian (The Third Rome) messianic Christianity, reflecting the aspects of the Russian soul discussed by Spengler in The Decline of the West.  Thus, Father Zosima asserts a form of collectivist Brotherhood, mutual care and love horizontally across society, in a leveling egalitarian manner, independent of social rank – the expansive horizon, the horizontal plane, as discussed by Spengler. While this is not our Nietzschean “cup of tea” so to speak, it does reflect a type of “will to power” = the idea of the inevitable victory of this worldview, the memetic conquest of humanity (Russian Bolshevism – a secularized version of Father Zosima’s philosophy?).

Ilyusha, Ilyushechka, or simply Ilusha in some translations, is one of the local schoolboys, and the central figure of a crucial subplot in the novel. His father, Captain Snegiryov, is an impoverished officer who is insulted by Dmitri after Fyodor Karamazov hires him to threaten the latter over his debts, and the Snegiryov family is brought to shame as a result. The reader is led to believe that it is partly because of this that Ilyusha falls ill, possibly to illustrate the theme that even minor actions can touch heavily on the lives of others, and that we are “all responsible for one another”.

If this child did not die and became a man, he’d most likely be a Beta or an Omega.

In summary, the Karamazovs were a bunch of Beta males who were manipulated, and ruined, by horrific nasty females. The only Karamazov who ended the story not badly ruined was Alyosha, not coincidentally the MGTOW Karamazov.  There’s a lesson there, I think.

Consider that young men typically have very strong sex drives.  Then further consider that increasing numbers of young heterosexual men are going MGTOW.  How terrible must today’s young women be to trigger such a reaction, to make men go against their most powerful biological drives.  This is something that women would do well to reflect upon.


Men in the “movement” themselves should reflect upon The Nature of Woman, and not waste their time and energy, and expend their political capital, defending what is not worth defending.  Although none of the male characters in The Brothers Karamazov are admirable from my perspective, some are worse than others.  Let’s not have “movement leaders” channeling Fyodor and Dmitri (hopefully, no Pavels are among us), turning themselves inside out for sly, malicious females.

Advertisements

Introducing SLC News

SLC = Stupidity, lies, and cowardice, with a “hat tip” to Saint Adolf.

Keeping track of “movement” dishonesty (“movement dishonesty” – a redundant term).

General “movement” dishonesty and misinterpretations of Madison Grant and population genetics.

A problem distinguishing the four cardinal directions.

Hitler took German identity and the existence of a north-south cline within Europe as essentially justifying the subjugation of Eastern European humanity as a whole as expendable inferiors, rather than as potential allies.

You know, North-South is not the same as East-West.  Essentially, Hitler – much kike modern-day Nutzis, despised any group that was not “Germanic” – whether these be from the South of East of Europe.

Speaking of Nutzis, a comment from that article:

Hitler (and Western people in general) correctly considered Russians to be Asiatic barbarians, To this day Russia is ruled by oriental despots;

Why would anyone want to ally with an aggressive and corrupt regime?

Heil Merkel!  The Ultra Aryan!  Heil!  Heil! Heil!

Tin Cup Tuesday!  Happy Holidays, suckers!

The “solution” is to walk around wearing shorts, spouting Norse poetry, blowing on Viking horns (reality or euphemism, who knows?), and letting leftist infiltrators “vet” your meetings.  Even the “Far-Right” in the UK is a joke.

Attorney Glen Allen was fired by the city of Baltimore because of information found in records more than a decade old that were probably stolen from the now all-but-defunct National Alliance. Mr. Allen supposedly attended a conference or bought reading material. Therefore, he was fired as a lawyer simply for associating with a group liberals do not like, not because of any professional misconduct over a career of many years.

Is that the material taken by “Smoky Mountain SS?”  Or another instance of files walking away from the great vanguard of the Aryan renaissance?  The tragicomedy gets better and better.

The tin cup panhandlers at VDARE have it right: Trump – “the last chance for White America” – has turned out to be a cucking, elitist, mainstream Establishment Republican disaster.

While the Beavis-and-Butthead gamesters squeal with delight with every Trumpian Twitter “neg’ the adults in the room realize that Trump is squandering all is political capital and is busy dismantling the base that elected him. Who was it again who labeled Trump – from the very beginning – a “vulgar ignorant buffoon?”

More typical Type I “movement” commentary:

Your comment was good until the last five lines. We here on the European continent are under the onslaught of uncontrolled immigration invasion from Eastern Europe.

The hatred e.g. of Poles or Russians toward Germans and Westerners has the same nature of Blacks’ against White Americans: Poles and Blacks have contributed nothing to modern civilisation so they want to destroy it, out of envy and hatred against its creators.

Slavs who didn’t mix with Asians are White, but they are a small minority.

That’s from a comment left at The Occidental Observer.

That’s a story where all sides are stupid. First, the Alt Right and other precincts of Der Movement elevate ditzy female airheads as “movement” celebrities in a form of sex-based affirmative action to go along with the usual ethnic quotas.  Then these females are over-sensitive as well as vacuous.  Finally, the Beavis-and-Butthead brigade behave like typical juvenile jackasses.  Instead of “trolling” these trollops, just ignore them – you are the ones who created them in the first place by paying attention to them simply because they (presumably) have two X chromosomes, breasts, and a vagina.  You real what you sow.

Yeah, Derb, dumb Whites need to discriminate against smart Asians, or else we’ll have all sorts of resentment against them for taking over the top spots in society.

One question though.  If Asians are so much superior, why do they have to emigrate to White countries?  Why is, for example, the USA so much better that Asians come here?  Why, even a low-IQ greasy swarthoid train wreck like Italy has Chinatown infestations. Why do Chinese emigrate to Italy?  

One would have to think that maybe the Asians are not so superior after all, or they’re just invading, either relieve their population pressure or just for imperialistic urges.

In any case, we must resist them.  ALL of them.  Right, Derb?


A complete inversion of reality:


Greg Johnson
Posted December 14, 2017 at 3:35 pm | Permalink
There’s no affirmative action for women in this movement.
Your anger is misplaced.

Of course there is female affirmative action, in addition to the traditional ethnic-based version.  All these giggling, ditzy female airheads are being elevated solely because of their sex.  

Sir MGTOW and the Yeastbuckets

Some sense.

With all the recent hysteria about “women in the movement,” all of the voluminous scribblings and yawn-inducing podcasts, I note that most miss the point that this latest explosion is no doubt at least in part a male reaction to the ongoing “sexual harassment” moral panic burning through the mainstream society.  Indeed, there is the daily auto da fe, in which some screeching yeastbucket, full of moral righteousness and supported by myriads of conformist robots, accuses some hapless man of looking at her the wrong way twenty years ago. To the stake!  Nobody escapes the Spanish Inquisition!

Now, having to put up with these hectoring harridans in the “normie” realm, activist men do not want to have to endure smug, smirking women, and their White Knight enablers, behaving as if they are the SJW HR Department of Der Movement, laying down the law to all of us knuckle-dragging male brutes on how we are to behave to Milady Mudshark, Ganges Girl, Flabby Philosocat, or any of the others.

The reason for the Type I Alt Right “bullying” (and, yes, I’m no fan of their Beavis-and-Butthead activities either) and the Type II Sallisian (intentionally comic, for the autistically obtuse among you) tirades is, frankly, we’ve had enough of female-to male moral posturing.  Why is that so difficult to understand?

Finally someone gets it!

No immunity from criticism.  Get it, Counter-Currents?  Accountability for all, including your delicate little ladies.  

I’m sure you disagree. Always got to side with “da wimmin” though, right?  

A cruder but nevertheless accurate observation on the same topic   (emphasis added):

Weimar Republican
Ah yes the old Philosofat, I mean cat, lecturing men about masculinity, along with the rest of these empty-headed e-sluts. If you idiots are too clueless to see that all these ‘based’ childless cat ladies represent nothing but a feminist coup, then this movement and the white race deserve to die. This tubby bitch gets less than 2k viewers a video and has the audacity to tell critics of feminism to leave the Alt-Right.
Dear White Knights, have some self-respect because nobody else respects you, including these mediocre 4s you are pretending are Aryan maidens in a meadow.
I’m gonna shout from the hills until I’m banned: women are the death of any movement. Look at what they are doing to leftism as we speak. They will spread their #MeToo coup here next. Stop being a bunch of spineless, thirsty beta-orbiters and open your fucking eyes before it’s too late.
Roy Moore was accused by Republican women voters. Women are not political. They side with whoever is the strongest at any given moment. Be strong and they will come on their own. Stop pandering to pussy.

“Mediocre 4s?”  No, no, a thousand times, no!  These are great beauties (the faces that launched a thousand charging White Knights), and obviously – quite obviously, let there be no doubt! – that any criticism of these charming maidens is only – solely! – because all we insecure men are secretly enraged that they refused to go to the high school prom with us.  

Johnson debates “Longshanks” – which a (very interesting) website asserts is a South Asian.  I do not know for sure whether or not the individual identified at that post is really the Aryan warrior “Sven” but if it is, it’s another in a long series of non-Whites pushing a narrative of ultra-purity for Whites, and one can only guess (don’t try too hard, it’s not that difficult) about the underlying motive. There’s not only this (alleged) fellow, but others as well: deranged mestizos (“Sallis’ sophistry”), snarky Iranians (for Aryans!  For Aryans!)…the list goes on.  And since these specimens know how to appeal to Type I Nutzis, there’s always a place for them at the table (no place for Sallis, of course).  Type I Nutzis are really a problem.  We Type II activists are the solution.

And then some female idiot at Counter-Currents, some inane commentator, says that MGTOW is worse than feminism.  Are you mad?  Feminism is one of the major weapons used by the System to destroy the White race and wreck Western civilization; MGTOW is simply a reaction to that.  Now, taken to extremes, MGTOW can be racially destructive (we need to reproduce, after all), but taken to moderation, it can be useful. Instead of White Knighting, and the sweaty pussy pedestalization of “game,” it can serve men well to be more aloof from women, shift the supply-demand curve more to the benefit of men, instead of being one-sided to the advantage of women.  If it comes down to Sir MGTOW vs. the Yeastbuckets, I side with the former against the latter.

And a side note: All these Alt Right guys getting all excited over “Hatreon” – don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched.  Was it necessary to parody Patreon so obviously? Another example of Type I “movement” childishness.

More on Der Movement’s White-Knighting

Part of the moral panic.

Another breathless White-knighting Counter-Currents article says:

This leads us to the current issue with the online abuse of Alt Right women. Yes, the victims are all women, but what’s more, they are attractive women, especially McCarthy and Southern. This, I believe, is the main reason why their male followers place unreasonable demands upon them, demands that they would not place on their male counterparts. This also explains why the emotional responses to their foibles or past indiscretions have been so heated and cruel. Through no fault of their own, these women have the tendency to make young, insecure men feel mean.

Maybe the mudshark Southern is attractive.  But McCarthy?  Are you serious?  These are omega male standards.  And guess what, not everyone criticizing them is “young” or “insecure.”  The current crop of Counter-Currents writers are at a low level of quality.  It’s truly embarrassing.

A good comment:

This wasnt attack on women in alt-right. This was attack against coalburning camwhore Southern who is not alt-right and only exploiting right wing men and Tara who came in her defense for no reason whatsoever and used feminist talking points to defend her.
I am sad to see counter-currents decided to publish this feminist article and I am deeply troubled by the collectivist response by women in alt-right. They closed ranks as if they personally were attacked. This kind of attack is something that would never work with men. I was never against women in alt-right, there is small minority of women who are capable, but this response has had me thinking.

Johnson’s telling Freudian slip (emphasis added to the original 12/13/17 version [in case it’s changed]):

When someone is attacking you with a knife, you are a fool to wonder if maybe he has a point to make. He’s trying to harm you. You need to stop him, not debate him. Once I glimpse malice and dishonesty in a person, I shit from debating to shutting him down.

Yeah, Greg, that’s exactly what you’re doing to the debate.

What I see as a problem in Counter-Currents’ latest hysteria in defense of ditzy females is that it is taking place in the context of the current “sexual harassment moral panic” that is burning down American society.  It seems to me there’s a connection here, the same type of “women are always right, XX chromosomes uber alles” mentality.  It may be true that the “trolling” was “over-the-top” but there have been reasonable comments on Counter-Currents from a pro-male position (see above), and we see the response: “shit from debating.”  Indeed.

Female Followup, 12/12/17

More precise points to be made.

Since this is an important topic, I’d like to follow up on my last post and get more into the “female question” with somewhat more seriousness and reflection.

Certainly, women have a place within racial nationalism.  It’s their race too.  But some points to ponder:

1. We can debate whether or not to accept reformed mudsharks (*) but certainly CURRENT mudsharks should be anathema.  Why should we even have to debate something so basic?

2. Women need to be held to the same standards as men with respect to handling the “rough and tumble” world of dissident politics.  We’ve all been insulted.  I certainly have been over the years (often in vulgar terms – remember Silver?), including being insulted by Johnson himself (questioning my sanity).  Certainly, there have been ethnic-based insults.  Whatever.  Johnson has been viciously attacked himself over his personal life.  Anyone of any prominence in the “movement” – even a lower-level person like myself – has been subjected to harsh criticism.  Deal with it ladies, or move on.  Don’t expect to be pampered- in the “movement” zoo, it’s not going to happen, the chimps are going to be flinging their turds around on a regular basis.

3. If I’m going to eschew male Alt Lighters and other nitwits, I’ll do the same for females as well.

Look, it’s a question of character; the basic problem with Der Movement, Inc. – besides the fossilized dogma – is a question of character.  There’s too much emphasis on quantity over quality, too much eagerness to accept anyone, any validation, any sign of acceptance, no matter how flawed and tainted.  I don’t care if a race-mixing female posing as some sort of nationalist has “hundreds of thousands of followers.”  If the person in question is of flawed character, then that’s just multiplication of the flaw.  That’s adding zeroes to an already corrupted number.

If that’s “misogyny” then so be it.

*The white-knighting riposte here would be: “what about Spencer, Anglin, and Enoch” (or some other male activist with a history of dating/marrying, say, Asians or Jews)?  Three points.  First, those are your heroes, not mine.  As far as I’m concerned the entire “movement” should be flushed down the toilet.  Second, why leave out Derbyshire?  He considers himself Alt Right, and as part of the VDARE crew, is dipping into “movement” largess.  Why does Derbyshire always get a free pass?  Third, like it or not, female miscegenation is more damaging since women are the bottlenecks for reproduction.  But, yes, I don’t excuse males who mix, but, fine, we can have an amnesty for the past.  This still doesn’t excise CURRENT miscegenation.

Behold the Female, 12/12/17

Who are the real bastards (and bitches)?

Over at Counter-Currents, Greg Johnson goes railing against all the “bastards” in the “movement” (including me I suppose); the latest firestorm set off in defense of a pair of ditzy female airheads that any man of sense, any rational and serious activist, wouldn’t spend one nanosecond of their time thinking about (and that goes for all the Type I Nutzis attacking the vagina-holes to begin with) (*).

Putting the XX chromosome flotsam and jetsam (redundancy?) aside, what about Johnson’s main arguments in his tirade?  I mean, yes, I agree with the general sentiment.  But Counter-Currents is part of the problem, not part of the solution.  What with the endless feuding with Richard Spencer, and then the thin-skinned hysterical reaction against your humble blogger here for insisting on “movement” accountability, isn’t it possible that some people view Counter-Currents in the same manner that Counter-Currents views all the other “bastards” out there?  Remember the biblical passage about motes and beams, and all that.

I think a lot of these attacks are simply motivated by financial jealousy. 

Oh, yes, indeed, I agree: many of the “movement” feuds and infighting are motivated by financial jealousy.  I can certainly think of famous “movement” feuds of like character, some fairly recent.  But that’s only among the panhandlers, the tin cuppers.  Some of us are not asking for any money.  

Lauren can spend her earnings on any frilly, silly, frivolous thing she wants. It is a mistake to allow donors to think that they own a piece of you and can attach strings to their gifts. I have fired donors who have tried to do that.

It is hard for me to express my level of utter disgust with this quote.  The arrogance is breathtaking.  Gimme dat money – but don’t tell me how to spend it!   God forbid that donors “attach strings” to their money like, you know, having it spent on activities related to – gasp! – actual racial nationalism. No, damgummint, if Lauren wants to spend donations on “frilly things” (the mind boggles) she has that right!  Other folks want to spend donor money on opera tickets or dog food, hey, who are you to say nay to that?  

Really, now, this is just too much.  “Fired donors?”  Some people in the “movement” have balls the size of Jupiter and Saturn, that’s for sure; I haven’t seen such purified chutzpah since the last gelfite fish convention.

And you suckers still give money to these people who are basically metaphorically giving you the middle finger with one hand while they grab your cash with the other.  You should only hope you get “donor fired.”  Then you can spend your own money on your own (hopefully non-frivolous) things.  After all, it’s your money.  You earned it.  Spend it wisely.

And yet another XX heroine writes:

First of all, it seems really suspicious that the He-Man Woman-haters Club has suddenly come out in full force, often hiding behind fake names and new accounts. These are not people who stick their necks out for our cause. They are spending huge amounts of time online trying to drive women away from our movement. Are these men really nationalists? I don’t think so. Many of them are probably infiltrators.

I hate being vulgar and Alt Right-like, but in this one special case, I’ll make an exception, channel my inner Beavis-and-Butthead, and reply thus: go fuck yourself, you dumb cunt.  I’ve been involved in racial nationalism when many of these “ladies of the movement” were infants or toddlers; I was involved in “meatspace” IRL analog activism back when these budding Joan-of-Arcs were wearing diapers, I sacrificed career advancement because of all the time and effort spent in producing “movement” content (including material for Counter-Currents, by the way), I went to meet the Great Sage on the Mountaintop when these female soldiers of glory were sucking their thumbs (back then, only their thumbs) pining away for Santa Claus (and not for their latest Colored boyfriend), but, hey, if I dare criticize any of these sacrosanct ladies then I’m an infiltrator.  Well, yes, I know that Counter-Currents has vast experience with infiltrators, but maybe, just maybe, all you heroes are wrong this time?

No, let’s go off “white knighting” for active mudsharks, giggling retards, pontificating “Chinese maidens,” smug “beauties” with a room temperature IQ, and whiners who assert that any criticism is from“infiltrators.”

Pathetic.


And for those of you who think my own (somewhat tongue-in-cheek) tirade is “excessive” I’ll simply point out that if Counter-Currents didn’t ban me from commenting, I could have made more mature and restrained ripostes at the actual blog post in question.  Being unable to do so, it would seem that the comic tirade here is a good way of attracting attention to my views on the matter. Granted, women can have a place in the “movement.”  The types of people Johnson defends we could do without, however.  There’s a big difference.  And the panhandling arrogance just grates on me. 


*Aren’t I wasting time thinking about them?  Only to answer Johnson’s post. I hardly know who any of these women are other than perhaps engaging with their content briefly out of curiosity before turning if off after I couldn’t take any more of the superficially silly stupidity.

Cat Lady Observations

Cat ladies.

Comparative behavioural observations were made in the home setting in order to analyze the ethology of the human-cat relationship. Factors postulated, and indeed, found to influence that relationship included marital status of the human (women living alone, with a partner or with a partner and children)…

Relevance to EGI?   In Western nations, women have the right to vote (typically to the left of men), women can become political leaders (hello, Merkel), and thus “cat ladies” can determine the downward path of Western civilization, destroying our (and their own) genetic interests, and leaving a trail of ruin and lamentation in their wake.

The solution is not “game” – men groveling to female sexual power – but, instead, men retaking control of their nations and their civilization, enforcing traditional sex roles, and forcing the “cat ladies” out of politics and back into the shadows where their greatest decision would be what brand of cat food to buy for their feline “significant other(s).”