Category: behold the movement

None Dare Call It Hypocrisy

Well, actually, I dare.

I see it as highly hypocritical that the same “movement” “leaders” – all the quota queens – endlessly complain about being “deplatformed” (and use that as part of their equally endless tin cup panhandling), while at the same time these “leaders” behave the same way with respect to racialist dissidents who honestly critique the “movement” and its “leaders” – “ban” them, essentially “deplatform” them from the central media centers of (what passes for) “movement” discourse.

It is important to clear up some matters lest I be accused of hypocrisy or inconsistency.  First, I do agree with the argument – made, for example, by Bowery at Majority Rights when he and I were both participating at that blog – that freedom of association trumps freedom of speech.  I further made the argument at my own blogs that freedom of speech does not obligate anyone to host any specific type of speech at their own forum; again, freedom of association is above freedom of speech, as long as that speech has somewhere else to go. So, yes, I agree that a blog owner can “ban” anyone they want from their site, and that “banned” person can go and set up their own blog and do their own thing elsewhere on the Internet.  After all, that’s ultimately why this blog exists (and, if I remember correctly, for example, Majority Rights was established after its founders were essentially declared persona non grata at Gene Expression).  I have also argued, in like sense, that a blog can be viewed as a form of political warfare, and so why should political soldiers benefit their enemies by facilitating those enemies’ dissemination of their ideas?  There is no obligation to host your enemy.  Very good, but is a fellow racial activist really an “enemy” because they criticize some of your ideas and actions?  Because they state that you should be held accountable for mistakes (according to your own declared standards of behavior)?  Are fellow activists the functional equivalent of SJW leftists?

It is also true that there is a difference between being banned from a blog (or a set of blogs) and having a major (albeit privately owned) company, which is functionally equivalent to a public utility, banning its use by an entire class of people based on, for example, their political views.  However, the “why should you assist the enemy?” argument cuts both ways here.  The owners of Amazon, Twitter, PayPal, etc. can argue – why should they be obligated to support their enemies?  Oh, you say that they are so successful that they are equivalent to public utilities and so they must be obligated to serve everyone.  Very well.  Imagine the same principle is turned inward to the “movement” – some “movement” blogs, sites, groups, and organizations are so successful (within the “movement” itself) that they are equivalent to “movement” “public utilities” and so they must be obligated to serve all racial activists, even those they disagree with.  I’m sure that violation of freedom of association would be rejected, even though in principle the argument is the same (adjusted for scale between society-at-large and the “movement”).

I’m not making a legalistic argument in this post; instead, I’m making a moral one, based on principles, and based on character and integrity (or the lack therefore in Der Movement).  The basic truth is that these “leaders” are endlessly whining about being deplatformed by private companies, and they behave the same way to racial activist dissidents they do not like.  The scale is different, but the basic principle is the same, and most of the arguments as to why private companies should be obligated to interface with, and serve, the “movement” as a whole can be made to argue that the “movement” as a whole needs to interface with the dissidents within its ranks.

Basically, I see the behavior of the “leaders” as being one of cowardice – fear of engaging with dissident critics and those critics’ ideas – as well as the prima donna sense of entitlement that derives from being products of the “movement’s” affirmative action program – how dare anyone criticize them!  Why should they stoop to answering critics?.  Low character hypocrites: behold the Type I Quota Queen “Leadership” of Der Movement: fearfully hiding from those who would critique their flawed ideas and those who would hold them accountable for their failures.

Note: Someone may point out that my own blogs have traditionally never had comments sections.  That is true.  First, I’m not a fan of such sections, the signal-to-noise ratio is poor; most “movement” comments threads of full of asinine Type I activists, trolls, fetishists, defectives, and “antis.”  Second, and even more importantly, unlike our “fearless leaders,” I am not a full time professional activist (living off of supporters’ donations). I’m merely a part-time amateur; I simply do not have the time to deal with comments; to my mind, it is more important, and more prudent, to invest my limited time in producing new content.  However, our heroic leaders are indeed full time activists with free time aplenty, they are people who believe that comments sections have value, so there is obviously a difference between my blog and theirs in that regard.

Advertisements

Trump, Bannon, Der Movement, and Ted Sallis

Right again…and again…and again…

Long time readers of this blog know that I have been critical of Trump for a long time, labeling him during the campaign as a vulgar and ignorant buffoon, a beta race cuck, a fraud, and a person who very clearly showed signs that he really want to be President. This post from October 2016 sums it up (emphasis added):

But, no, just like Der Movement that adores him, Trump is an incompetent affirmative action case, with no restraint or long-term strategic thinking. Some leftist criticisms of Trump are correct: he is intellectually and temperamentally unfit to be President.  But, Clinton is far more unfit, and, anyway, I’m not going to vote for Trump because I think he would be a good President.  I support Trump solely to send a message, solely to unleash the dogs of chaos, solely to throw a monkey wrench into the creaking machinery of the multicultural consensus. What we need more of: misery, despair, hatred, anger, distrust, racial and cultural balkanization; these are all things growing as a result of Fat Don’s unapologetic politically incorrect civic nationalism coupled to SJW hysteria and Colored entitlement.  
Let’s be honest though: Trump the man is a disaster, easily the worst general campaign candidate in my lifetime.  I’ve never seen such a combination of joyful ignorance, in-your-face laziness, unpreparedness, delusion, inability to learn from mistakes, the hysterical lack of restraint one would expect from one of Trump’s Negro friends (or even worse: a swarthoid Afrowop) – what is this Trump?  He’s a goddamn embarrassment.
And if the Trump lovers think I am being too harsh on their hero, consider the following. When Trump eschewed doing a mock debate, we were assured that he was being adequately prepped by his advisers while riding the campaign plane, advisers who were imploring Trump not to let himself be baited and side-tracked by Clinton.  And look what happened. What an idiot.
I do wonder what those psychologists told Clinton on how to handle Trump. Maybe something like this: “This guy Trump deep down really does not want to be President, he doesn’t want the responsibility, and he doesn’t want to give up his lifestyle.  He went into it for his ego, because he was angry at Obama.  But he is inwardly rebelling against becoming President, which is why he is constantly sabotaging himself.  All you need to do is set him up to self-destruct and he’ll inevitably detonate in an explosion of unrestrained tweets.”
Despite all of this, Trump can still win: after all, Clinton is also a historically terrible candidate and there’s lots of anger out there in White America.  But, let’s “keep it real” – anyone who says that Trump is “the last chance of White America” is more of an idiot than is Trump himself.

Note that I was correct about the chaos that Trump would bring.  Just look at 2017.

Der Movement’s take on Trump was quite different.  To the quota queens, Trump was “the last chance for White America,” an alpha male hero, The God Emperor, an American Caesar and we are fearful he may actually stabilize the corrupt System since he’ll be so good, someone who will enact real pro-White demographic change, a master of 4-D chess, having Sessions as Attorney General alone is worth Trump’s victory (that before Trump started feuding with Sessions and the Trump fanboys suddenly decided Sessions was a “boomer cuck”), Bannon will really get things moving for us (before Bannon was fired and the Trump-Bannon feud heated up, solidifying the power of the Jarvanka Jewish Globalist faction in the Trump administration), In Trump We Trust…well, you get the picture.

Recently, there have been some interesting revelations, based on a new book, which has led to the anti-Bannonism of Trump [Note: Bannon is an idiot himself for making the comments he did.  Notice how the Left never acts like these juvenile, retarded “rightists”].

Based on my reading of Trump, I believe that most of the “revelations” that follows are true.  Let’s look at these and compare them to the views of Trump of Sallis vs. Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Read this.

“I’ve known Steve Bannon a long time. If I thought he was a racist or alt-right or any of the things, the terms we could use, I wouldn’t even think about hiring him,” Trump told reporters who questioned Bannon’s white nationalist following on November 26, 2016.

Gee, so much for the Alt Right having great influence in The God Emperor Administration.

In February, Bannon was dubbed “The Great Manipulator” and the “second most powerful man in the world” on the cover of Time magazine. Later that month, a campaign titled “postcards to President Bannon” was initiated, joking that the Breitbart native was the real head of state.
Two months later, Bannon was removed from the National Security Council.
“I am my own strategist,” Trump told the New York Post in April. He then told the Wall Street Journal that Bannon was just “a guy who works for me.”

Hey, I thought Bannon in power was a crowning achievement for the Trump Presidency.

After the white supremacist protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August, Trump defended Bannon by saying: “I like Mr. Bannon. He is a friend of mine … He is a good man. He is not a racist. I can tell you that. He is a good person ... We’ll see what happens with Mr. Bannon.”

Note to Alt Right: According to Trump, being a “racist” and being a “good person” are completely incompatible, completely orthogonal.  Cuckadoodledoo!  All Hail the God Emperor!  Hail Kek!  Pepe!  Pepe!

Also read this.

According to Wolff, Trump didn’t want to become president. The ultimate goal of his bid for the White House was to become a “martyr” to Hillary Clinton and to become “the most famous man in the world.”
For those involved in his campaign, the goal was to lose by as small a margin as possible and then, after November, parlay their raised national profiles into bigger and better opportunities.
“His daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared would be international celebrities,” Wolff wrote. “Steve Bannon would become the de facto head of the Tea Party movement. Kellyanne Conway would be a cable news star. Melania Trump, who had been assured by her husband that he wouldn’t become president, could return to inconspicuously lunching. Losing would work out for everybody. Losing was winning.”

Gee, that sounds familiar.  It’s almost as it some Far Right blogger actually suggested back in October 2016 that Trump really didn’t want to actually be elected President.  

With no desire to win the White House, Trump had little plan for how to proceed with his post-election transition. Ailes, a longtime friend and confidante, recommended former House Speaker John Boehner to serve as his chief of staff. To which Trump replied: “Who’s that?”

Ignorant as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

According to Wolff, even Trump’s daughter has mocked his hair privately to friends and associates:
“She often described the mechanics behind it to friends: an absolutely clean pate — a contained island after scalp-reduction ­surgery — surrounded by a furry circle of hair around the sides and front, from which all ends are drawn up to meet in the center and then swept back and secured by a stiffening spray. The color, she would point out to comical effect, was from a product called Just for Men — the longer it was left on, the darker it got. Impatience resulted in Trump’s orange-blond hair color.”

Buffoon as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

And read this as well.

11. As a candidate, Trump had no interest in learning about the Constitution, which he knew very little about. “I got as far as the Fourth Amendment, before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head,” said Sam Nunberg, a former adviser to the Trump campaign.

Ignorant as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

16. Trump never reads. “He didn’t process information in any conventional sense. He didn’t read. He didn’t really even skim. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semiliterate,” the book says. 

Ignorant as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

17. Trump would mention getting in bed with other women. “Trump liked to say that one of the things that made life worth living was getting your friends’ wives into bed,” the book claims.

Vulgar as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.  I’m sure the Gamester-Roissy crowd thinks that this behavior is wonderfully “alpha” – to me, to the extent this is true, it shows that Trump is a moral turd, a despicable human being.

19. The president’s lifestyle followed many unusual routines. “If he was not having his 6:30 dinner with Steve Bannon, then, more to his liking, he was in bed by that time with a cheeseburger, watching his three screens and making phone calls,” the book says.

No comment.

Some may think that the well-balanced (not crazy and bitter) Ted is insufferable, but when you are right, you are right, and pointing out the track record of this blog vs. Der Movement is perfectly defensible when making points about the latter’s incompetence and undeserved support.

Meanwhile, all you “movement” rank-and-file continue to support all the “leaders” who are wrong time and again, idiots who once again fell for the “man on white horse syndrome.”  What we have in Der Movement is a form of reverse natural selection” you guys support the failed, the botched, the incompetent, while spurning those who have the good sense to understand things before they are obvious to the unwashed masses.

The State of Der Movement: 2017

2017: The Year of No Accountability
I will now review the State of Der Movement for the year 2017.  However, I am going to extend the analysis a bit beyond Jan. 1 2017 to include all events starting with the election of Donald Trump on Nov. 8, 2016.  The last two months of 2016 belong with 2017; together they form a seamless whole, as far as an integrated narrative goes.  After all, the last two months of 2016, including “Hailgate,” set the tone for “movement” ups and downs in 2017, so an artificial separation on 1/1/17 serves no purpose.
This analysis will be divided between (1) The American scene and (2) everywhere else.
1. American
There are many players on the American scene, but if we apply the Pareto principle here, and concentrate on the most important and influential figures, we have the triumvirate of Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, and Jared Taylor.
Spencer is the “public face” of the American “movement,” the main organizer, the most important social media presence, the biggest “bogeyman” for the Left/System, and, given his relatively youthful age, the leading contender as the successor to, say, David Duke as the Godfather of American Racialism.  Greg Johnson represents the intellectual element, the Grand Thinker of Der Movement, and represents “traditionalism” as well as being an American exponent of “ethnonationalism.” Jared Taylor plays the role of “elder statesman,” and also represents the more moderate, Jew-friendly, HBD/race realist-oriented precincts of the American scene.
There are other important figures as well, no doubt.  Kevin MacDonald is an important intellectual figure, more science- and academic-oriented than Johnson.  Duke is still around, as is Kevin Strom.  VDARE laughably considers itself part of the Alt Right. There are of course other “movement” figures of greater or less importance, some of whom have delusions of grandeur. But, still, the Pareto ratio works; we can get 80% of “movement” importance in the 20% represented by Spencer, Johnson, and Taylor.
Let’s briefly consider each in turn, before getting to America in general, before moving on to Sallis/EGI Notes and then to the rest of the world.
Spencer: Richard Spencer is well meaning, good on camera, reasonably articulate, and has leadership potential.  The basic problem here revolves around judgment (or the lack thereof) – judgment and maturity.  One hopes that as he enters his 40s, more maturity will lead to more gravitas and better judgment, and an understanding that Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism does not appeal to most people over age 30, and that the likes of Jorjani should never have been dealt with in the first place.  The “Alt Right’ brand has passed its expiration date, and realizing that will perhaps be the first test that Spencer has to pass to transition to a more serious and informed racialist leader. I’ll give Spencer credit for having good instincts in his initial reaction to Brexit and for being pan-European in his attitude.
 
Johnson: Greg Johnson is obviously intelligent, well-educated, and well read, and has produced good intellectual material for the “movement.”  No doubt about that.  Unfortunately, for some reason, over the time period considered here, Counter-Currents has taken a negative turn, with Johnson becoming ever more intolerant of criticism and displaying increasing irascible irritability.  Differences about ethnonationalism are one thing (however, the promotion of intra-European “ethnic cleansing” was indefensible) but the lack of accountability concerning the two infiltrations is something else entirely.  Everyone makes mistakes, sometimes bad ones, but to compound bad judgment with a lack of responsibility is disturbing. Coupled with bizarre turns, such as “fired donors” and expending political capital in defense of Lauren Southern (including laughable articles analyzing the onanistic habits of her viewers) and bringing back alcohol prohibition (I don’t drink myself, but, hey, I thought we were supposed to promote “West Coast White nationalism,” appealing to all sorts of people?), I have to say, objectively speaking, that if Counter-Currents doesn’t change direction back to how it was several years ago, the site will slowly, but inevitably, slip into Majority Rights-style irrelevance. True, they are still finding suckers to meet their panhandling goals, but I’m looking long-term.

One basic problem with Johnson is that he wrote an article stating that is OK to “punch right” when it is deserved, and he has done it himself (including asserting, in so many words, that your humble blog host is an embittered lunatic), but he has a “glass chin” when subjected to criticism.

He wrote (emphasis added):

…our resources are limited and our cause serious. We cannot, therefore, be held hostage to the most reckless and selfish among us, people who commit crimes or flout basic principles of operational security.

Operational security…you mean like having two infiltrators attending your “extremely vetted” meetings at the same time?  You mean inviting an infiltrator to give a speech at your meeting about…drum roll please…the dangers of anti-fascist infiltration?  You mean letting in infiltrators who come with the flimsiest of pretexts (“I’m Swedish!”  “I’m a move critic!”)?

Showing solidarity to such people rewards vice and penalizes virtue.

Oh yes, indeed.

Intelligence agencies regularly disavow spies who go rogue or allow themselves to be captured. We should take ourselves just as seriously and be equally ruthless with failure.

Yet when I called for accountability, Johnson banned me from commenting at his blog.

Second, in the battle of ideas, there is no sense in demanding that we present a united front, particularly on issues where there are real disagreements of principle.

Tell that to that Curwen fellow, who disagreed with Johnson about Lauren Southern and was essentially air-brushed off of Counter-Currents comments.  And when I disagree with “movement” dogma, I’m labeled “crazy” and “bitter.”

Taylor: Jared Taylor has, obviously, done good work over the years.  Like Johnson, he’s intelligent, well educated, and well read.  He’s articulate and good on camera.  Like Johnson, he’s run some of my work at his site.  But Amren has been doubling down on all the negatives it has been exhibiting ever since I stopped writing for them.  Thus, Taylor throws Spencer under the bus after Hailgate, because some Jews – huWhite Men of the West, we are told – might get offended, meanwhile White ethnics keep on getting bashed, the latest being Munro’s asinine hit-piece against Romanians (no “Men of the West” they).  If the “Alt Right” brand has passed its shelf life, then the tired “HBD/race-realist praise the Jews and worship the Orientals Alt Wrong” brand has long been giving off the odor of decay.  And as for the “gateway hypothesis” – that Amren is the moderate entry point for people to enter the “movement” after which they become more radicalized – I’ll say it again: there is no empirical evidence to support that hypothesis.  It is all conjecture, hypothesis, anecdotal “evidence” – it sounds reasonable so people assume it is true.  Arguing that there is no evidence that it is not true does not impress: it is part of Western logic and Western law that it is the party making the assertion who needs to provide the evidence.  If people assert that Amren is of value because it is a gateway, then actually show quantitative data to back it up.  Otherwise, all I see is a site that tells us that Jews are “huWhite Men of the West,” that asserts that Orientals are high-IQ supermen, and that White ethnics are cringing, low-IQ subhuman (and non-Western!) mongrels.  More of a cul-de-sac rather than any sort of legitimate gateway.  Don’t believe me? Read not only the Munro article but many of the comments to it, seething with contemptuous racial disdain for Romanians and other Eastern Europeans (with the occasional shot at Italians, what would any self-respecting Amren comments thread be without that?).

Summary: Please note, as I’ve said in the past (and ignored by the hysterical), that any criticisms of leading activists is business, not personal. I’m sufficiently self-aware to understand that I am (including IRL) a cold and unfriendly person by nature; my interest is in ideas, not people. I, quite frankly, could care less about any “movement personality” at the level of them as individual people, my concerns are on their ideas, actions, effects on racial nationalism, and what they do and do not represent.  Even when I comment on qualities such as personal character, loyalty, moral fiber. etc. that is also business and not personal, since such comments are made solely looking through the lens of evaluating the person’s fitness for “movement” leadership.  This point must be stressed because there are people – mostly Type I activists (and perhaps some individuals discussed above) – who really are concerned with “movement” gossip and with personalities as personalities.

If any of the abovementioned individuals were to correct what I see as deficiencies, I would be among the first to praise them for it.  I don’t see much of a probability of that occurring in 2018; and I believe only Spencer is young enough, and mentally flexible enough, to change course, eventually.

Der Movement (America) in general: Wasted opportunities galore in 2017.  Trump’s election, the rise of right-wing populism, and the vast increase in sociopolitical chaos and racial balkanization left in its wake endless opportunity that was squandered in feuding, stupid antics, Charlottesville Ragnarok, infiltrations, panhandling Tin Cup White nationalism, and zero accountability.  Trump’s cucking exposed the “movement’s” obsessive “man on white horse syndrome” fetishism once again, and the year is ending with the absolute stupidity of feuding over stupid female YouTube celebrities, and Munro’s vicious attack against Romanians – the people who gave us Corneliu Codreanu and Ion Mota (as opposed to those huWhite Jews giving us Sigmund Freud and Noel Ignatiev).
Sallis: I made one large error – I dismissed the possibility of a Trump victory, naively believing the mainstream media and its polling.  I’ve admitted being wrong about this before; I will do so again.  This was a significant error of judgment on my part.  I was also a bit too optimistic about the meaning of Brexit; Spencer’s initial reaction was more on the mark.  On the other hand, I have been right about virtually everything else: that Trump is a vulgar, ignorant buffoon who will betray the “movement’s” “man on white horse syndrome” fantasies through continued cucking; the unwillingness of the “movement” and its leaders to admit being wrong about Trump (or anything else for that matter – no accountability); the costs of affirmative action and ethic fetish, culminating in the Hermansson humiliation; that the “movement’s” unscientific obsession with “racial purity” and its misinterpretation of genetic tests will lead to System mocking of how “you are not pure so racial nationalism is illegitimate” – 2017 being the year in which activists were roundly ridiculed by the System for getting “impure” 23andme results; that White ethnics would support a Presidential candidate deemed “racist” (as opposed to Bush/Romney/McCain overt cucks); and the fact that a Trump victory – his betrayals notwithstanding – would “trigger” the Left and promote chaos and balkanization.
As far as achieving objectives, with respect to political objectives, my efforts have been a complete and unmitigated failure. Der Movement continues to be dominated by Type I fascists, Nutzis, ethnic fetishists, and morons.  The proposed New Movement fundamentals outlined at Western Destiny are ignored. My influence on the general direction of the “movement” is, currently, non-existent.  Those are objective facts that cannot be evaded.  Nor do I currently have any bright ideas or strategies to alter this situation in 2018.  Being right most of the time (an objective, verifiable fact, not rampant egoism) doesn’t accomplish much if no one pays attention.  That’s stark reality. If the irascibility of this blog is cause or effect (or, possibly, both) of that reality is a determination I’ll leave up to the reader.
On the positive side, I’ve produced some material that at least I myself think has some value, and I finally did do at least a preliminary quantitation of genetic structure using the DifferInt program.  Last December, I introduced the Moralpath concept, which I believe has significant explanatory power and is a novel insight into human psychology.  And I’ve combined on the blog a mix of political commentary, some science and technics articles, ruminations of culture and civilization, analysis of EGI in the practical world, as well as the typical criticisms of Der Movement.  Even if few people know or care, I’m reasonably satisfied with the memes produced here.
2. Everywhere else.
There was some good news from Austria – “the first Far-Right government since WWII” – although they are hardly “Far-Right” by my standards. Well, it’s better than nothing. The news from Germany was worse than nothing: Merkel back in power. Yes, some gains for Alterative for Germany, but in the context of the “refuge” crisis (alien invasion of Germany and the rest of Europe in response to Merkel’s genocidal invitation) the response of the electorate was pathetic and disgusting.  In the UK, Brexit played out as the pan-Europeanists more or less predicted: Polish plumbers bad, “Commonwealth” Desis and Jamaicans good.  Pathetic once again.
However, the biggest news from Europe was the utter failure of mainstreaming, particularly in France and the Netherlands.  This was a spectacular refutation of the mainstreaming meme (not that defenders of mainstreaming, in any of their online guises, had the character to come out and admit they were wrong – once again: 2017, the Year of Zero Accountability). There is no empirical evidence supporting mainstreaming, similar to the lack of data supporting the “gateway” scenario.  Mainstreaming seems eminently reasonable; the problem is it does not work in real life.  Instead, we see Orban’s continued success with farstreaming, a moderate rightist moving toward the extremes and becoming ever more popular. Mainstreaming fails for many reasons, not the least of which it allows the mainstream Right to shift slightly and overlap many of your positions and hence make themselves into more electable and palatable versions of yourself; while on the other hand, you disillusion your hardcore supporters and you still cannot appeal to that fraction of the electorate who are, and will always remain, unalterably opposed to you.
In summary, given the challenges Europe faces, the response from the Right and the White electorate has been pitiful.  And the elites are doubling down on their treason, saying that the demographic displacement of Europeans from their homelands is “inevitable” and needs to be “properly managed.”  How did such people get into power?  Ultimately, if you go back far enough (that is, even those traitors appointed by other elites are the fault of the voters, because the ones who appointed them were themselves voted into office) it’s because Europeans voted them in, and won’t vote out, and won’t vote nationalists in. There’s some resistance from Eastern Europe, but unless those nations have the gumption to leave the EU – and do so for racial nationalist and not civic nationalist (Brexit) reasons – then they are just playing cards on the deck of the Titanic. Either leave the EU or seize the EU for nationalists, but the latter cannot be done without a nationalist resurgence in Western Europe.
Outside of Europe (and the USA)?  Australia?  New Zealand?  Canada?  Nothing positive to speak of.
The milksop White race continues to be the historical embodiment of cuckiness. The descent into darkness continues.

More I vs. II

Informative side-by-side comparisons.

Some tell-tale signs to distinguish Type I from Type II fascists:

Serious sci/fi fantasy:

Type I: Lord of the Rings

Type II: Book of the New Sun

General sci/fi fantasy:

Type I: Harry Potter

Type II: Dying Earth (Jack Vance), Voyage of the Space Beagle

Literary trickster/rogue:

Type I: Loki

Type II: Cugel

Favorite Fascist:

Type I: Adolf Hitler

Type II: Francis Parker Yockey

Manosphere:

Type I: Roissy

Type II: MGTOW

Favorite historical weapon:

Type I: Viking axe

Type II: Nuclear tipped missile

Outdated yet technically intriguing weapon system that needs to be updated with more modern technology:

Type I: trebuchet

Type II: SLAM missile

Favorite “movement” books:

Type I: The Dispossessed Majority, March of the Titans, The Turner Diaries, Mein Kampf

Type II: Imperium, On Genetic Interests

Genotype vs. Phenotype:

Type I: Phenotype

Type II: Genotype 

Pepe/Kek:

Type I: Thinks it’s great; all hail the God Emperor

Type II: The most stupidly juvenile nonsense imaginable

How Trump won PA and the election in 2016:

Type I: Caravans of Amish horse and buggies descended on the voting stations

Type II: Actually studied voting patterns and notes that Trump gained the required votes in “coal country” that is full of working class White ethnics

Type of Fascism:

Type I: Feudal Traditionalism

Type II: Avant-Garde Futurism

American Literature:

Type I: Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby

Type II: Captain Ahab in Moby Dick

The Watchmen:

Type I: The Comedian

Type II: Rorschach

Marvel Comics:

Type I: Deadpool

Type II: The Mad Thinker

DC Comics:

Type I: Superman

Type II: Batman

Baseball:

Type I: Babe Ruth

Type II: Ty Cobb

Afrowop Philosopher:

Type I: Julius Evola

Type II: Giovanni Gentile

Ancient “ius”:

Type I: Arminius

Type II: Marius

Favorite East Asian export:

Type I: women

Type II: Gigantor

Mafia moves:

Type I: Goodfellas

Type II: Godfather

Corleone family:

Type I: Sonny

Type II: Michael

Upper arm exercises:

Type I: biceps curl

Type II: triceps extension

Christmas cartoon characters:

Type I: Yukon Cornelius

Type II: Grinch

Thermopylae:

Type I: 300

Type II: Gates of Fire

Psychological aberration:

Type I: Psychopathy

Type II: Moralpathy

Serial killers:

Type I: Ted Bundy

Type II: Zodiac

Animal protein:

Type I: red meat

Type II: chicken and fish

Typical dessert:

Type I: candy bar

Type II: fruit

Cake vs. Pie:

Type I: cake

Type II: pie

Rodent:

Type I: rat

Type II: beaver or porcupine

Venomous snake:

Type I: rattlesnake

Type II: cobra

Twin Peaks:

Type I: Sheriff Truman

Type II: Agent Cooper

Mighty Max:

Type I: Norman

Type II: Virgil

Body form: 

Type I: mesomorph

Type II: ectomorph

Myopia:

Type I: contacts, Lasik

Type II: eyeglasses

Merkel:

Type I: Aryan uberfrau

Type II: genocidal lunatic

HBD:

Type I: science

Type II: pseudoscience

China:

Type I: Land of the Gods

Type II: Yellow Peril


Fictional English spy/secret agent:


Type I: James Bond

Type II: George Smiley


Romanians:


Type I: Low IQ, Gypsyized, non-Westerners

Type II: A European people that produced Codreanu and Mota


Italians:


Type I: Low IQ, mongrel, Arab Afrowops

Type II: A European people that are an integral part of the West

SLC News: More December 2017

Several items.

There’s an old saying that when one’s opponents make errors, you should just sit back and let them do it, and I have actually been holding back on commenting on some things recently, for that very reason.  However, when things occur that are absolutely ludicrous, the cost/benefit ratio moves in the direction of shining a light on it.  Included in this in the remarkable decision of Counter-Currents to expend its political capital in Der Movement defending the likes of Lauren Southern.  We’ve reached new heights of “jumping Moby Dick” with this:

It is possible that this will be the dumbest piece of writing in the history of Counter-Currents. That’s not my fault. The subject matter is dumb, and it will be hard to rise above it. I’ll do my best, and because the subject matter is dumb, I’ll be brief.

Among the recent charges against Lauren Southern is the claim that she is a sex worker who poses in revealing clothing in order to encourage men to masturbate to her pictures. She makes money thereby, so she is in essence a pornstar, even though she doesn’t perform sex acts on camera. Her pictures are so sexually powerful that many men are compelled to masturbate. These beta-orbiters just can’t help themselves, and Lauren acquires money from the cyber-fapping that she encourages.

That may be good for page hits I suppose, but the damage it does to the intellectual credibility of that blog is stupendous.  It’s analogous to Majority Rights being discredited by allowing J Richards to post porno pictures of women with smiley faces cover their nipples.

That Der Movement has been actually reduced to debating the onanistic habits of those who waste their time watching YouTube videos of useless females is, frankly, astounding.  Not surprising to me, but, from an objective standpoint, still astounding.


Look at this (apparently now deleted) exchange (emphasis added):


Joseph CurwenPosted December 21, 2017 at 4:57 am | Permalink

I think we should focus on securing the existence of our people and a future for white children instead of writing essays of 1.200 words defending someone who isn’t one of us and is actively against White Nationalism. 

Greg JohnsonPosted December 21, 2017 at 11:38 am | Permalink

Prove to me that you have done one concrete thing to help the white cause, beyond posting comments on the web.

Joseph CurwenPosted December 21, 2017 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

1. In cooperation with another Comrade, translating and publishing a considerable number of texts of H. Covington, whose works were totally unknown in the Spanish speaking world. Here is the blog (now more or less inactive due to personal reasons):
http://nfspanish.blogspot.com.co/
2. Translating (and publishing the next year) “Nietzsche His Life and Works” from Anthony M. Ludovici. The publishing house (Editorial Solar) is the same that published “Mein Kampf”, “The Protocols” and other important works in the Spanish speaking world.
3. Right now, I’m working in the translation of Nesta Webster’s “The Secret of the Zodiac”, to be published in the same publishing house.

Greg JohnsonPosted December 21, 2017 at 2:48 pm | Permalink 

Good work. Don’t waste any more time commenting here.


Johnson’s behavior is becoming increasingly erratic. The complete intolerance to any criticism is simply not normal, and not reflective of his behavior, say, five years ago.  

The last I looked, that exchange has now been deleted from the thread!  Instead, half the current comments are from Asians and lickspittle Asia-worshipers.  Remember this?  Do you still doubt that post’s accurate observation of your fearless leaders, who, in their almost pathological lack of self-awareness, are suffering from the same outgroup altruism and ingroup altruistic punishment that they decry in others?


Read the Curwen-Johnson exchange, consider it has been deleted, and carefully consider the consequences of a “movement leadership” that favors cunning Orientals and race-mixing mudsharks over genuine, sincere activists.  Consider the monumental hubris of people who cannot take the slightest hint of criticism and who state that they “fire” donors who have the temerity to ask that their donations be used for certain projects. 


A major difference between EGI Notes and Counter-Currents is this.  95% of the over-the-top rhetoric here is (as I’ve stated many times for the obtuse) for effect; I’m intentionally ridiculing the “movement” clownshow that I’m completely exasperated with after putting up with more than twenty years of nonsense (the other 5% is genuine outrage against the likes of Deasy and Munro).  Johnson, on the other hand, I believe is 100% serious when he bans people simply for having the temerity to disagree with him on something, when he talks about “firing donors,” and when he expends political capital defending low rent slutty airheads whose “hundreds of thousands” of followers likely mostly are what Weev says they are.  If it all were all really a joke, I would say “well done,” you’ve outdone anything I’ve ever played out.  But it’s not a joke.  It’s actually serious.

Chinese Nationalist Maiden writes:

Of course, I know that I have to be immune to criticism myself since people will try to alienate me from the White survival movement merely because I am (a) an Asian and (b) a woman. These accusations sound nonsensical to me. Being an Asian woman is irrelevant to me for believing that White survival is right. I support Whites on principle and I am disgusted with the tasteless liberal-democratic leftist and Marxist-Leninist hatred of White people. Denying Whites the right to live is just beyond disgusting and I cannot live in good conscience with myself if I did not support White survival.

The problem is when non-Whites promote their own racial interests while pretending to be part of the “pro-White cause.”  This disgusting and dishonest “Chinese Nationalist Maiden” is one of the worst.  Can she tell us precisely: in what country do you live?  After all, if you are so much in favor of White survival, you wouldn’t be living in any (majority) White nation now, are you?  Of course – of course! – you live in, say, Taiwan or Singapore, right?  Right?


Silver, of all people, has been mostly talking good sense on the comments thread of the anti-Romanian Amren piece.  Now, catch this reply to Silver from the author of that piece:


Silver: ‘Politically, something being true is not, of itself, reason enough to say it. Decisions about what to say have to be weighed against their likely impact on political objectives.’

Anti-Romanian Ingrate: This sounds a bit like the sort of thing you hear from the left: ‘We shouldn’t talk about race because it’s likely to have bad social consequences.’ One of the virtues of the right is that it acknowledges the existence of objective truth and allows more or less free exploration in the attempt to get at it. It’s in the spirit of the West to do so.


Excuse me, you anti-Romanian outrageous, filthy hypocrite, but if “One of the virtues of the right is that it acknowledges the existence of objective truth and allows more or less free exploration in the attempt to get at it. It’s in the spirit of the West to do so” then I ask:


WHY DOESN’T AMREN RUN CRITICAL ARTICLES ABOUT JEWS ANALOGOUS TO THE ONE YOU WROTE ABOUT ROMANIANS?  WHY WON’T THEY EVEN TALK ABOUT POPULATION GENETICS STUDIES BY ISRAELI RESEARCHERS THAT SHOW JEWS TO BE DISTINCT AND DIFFERENT FROM EUROPEANS?  WHY WAS THE HORNBECK PIECE ABOUT MACDONALD MODIFIED TO MAKE IT MORE PRO-JEWISH?

Newsflash: Selective “honesty” is just another form of dishonesty.  Hypocrites.

Of related interest, this exchange:

Zaida  LHathaway • 15 hours agoBefore communism it was even worse in Eastern Europe: Slavs are incapable of producing anything of cultural value. Visit Poland or Romania and see the mess with your own eyes, as I’ve seen.

Independent Thinker  Zaida • 10 hours ago“Slavs are incapable of producing anything of cultural value.”
Complete hogwash. Let’s see: The periodic table of elements – Mendeleev, discovery of the atmosphere of Venus, the Law of Mass conservation, demonstrating the organic origin of peat, soil, coal petroleum, etc, plus many other things — Lomonosov, Quantum electronics work leading to the development of the laser and maser (and Nobel Prize) — Basov, Laser and Maser development (also same Nobel Prize) — Prokhorov, involved in the invention of the radio — Popov, work in low temperature physics leading to Nobel Prize — Pyotr Kapista, Development of Soviet nuclear weapons — Kurchatov, founder of field surgery — Pirogov, Stability theory of a dynamical system — Lyapunov, Timoshenko Beam Theory — Timoshenko, work in radioactivity, radium, and polonium — Marie Curie (recipient of two Nobel Prizes), inventor of the polarographic method, father of the electroanalytical method, and recipient of the Nobel Prize in 1959 for his discovery and development of the polarographic methods of analysis — Heyrovsky, inventor of Yablochkov Candle and Transformer — Yablochkov, Kolmogorov, Stravinsky, Prokofiev, Rimsky-Korsakov, Chopin, Tchaikovsky, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Gogol, Chekov, Repin, Aivazovsky, Vastnetsov, Polenov, … too many to mention..

I will now give you the most important comment in the entire blog history of EGI NotesThe biggest impediment to the success of pro-White activism is Der Movement, Inc. itself.

Introducing SLC News

SLC = Stupidity, lies, and cowardice, with a “hat tip” to Saint Adolf.

Keeping track of “movement” dishonesty (“movement dishonesty” – a redundant term).

General “movement” dishonesty and misinterpretations of Madison Grant and population genetics.

A problem distinguishing the four cardinal directions.

Hitler took German identity and the existence of a north-south cline within Europe as essentially justifying the subjugation of Eastern European humanity as a whole as expendable inferiors, rather than as potential allies.

You know, North-South is not the same as East-West.  Essentially, Hitler – much kike modern-day Nutzis, despised any group that was not “Germanic” – whether these be from the South of East of Europe.

Speaking of Nutzis, a comment from that article:

Hitler (and Western people in general) correctly considered Russians to be Asiatic barbarians, To this day Russia is ruled by oriental despots;

Why would anyone want to ally with an aggressive and corrupt regime?

Heil Merkel!  The Ultra Aryan!  Heil!  Heil! Heil!

Tin Cup Tuesday!  Happy Holidays, suckers!

The “solution” is to walk around wearing shorts, spouting Norse poetry, blowing on Viking horns (reality or euphemism, who knows?), and letting leftist infiltrators “vet” your meetings.  Even the “Far-Right” in the UK is a joke.

Attorney Glen Allen was fired by the city of Baltimore because of information found in records more than a decade old that were probably stolen from the now all-but-defunct National Alliance. Mr. Allen supposedly attended a conference or bought reading material. Therefore, he was fired as a lawyer simply for associating with a group liberals do not like, not because of any professional misconduct over a career of many years.

Is that the material taken by “Smoky Mountain SS?”  Or another instance of files walking away from the great vanguard of the Aryan renaissance?  The tragicomedy gets better and better.

The tin cup panhandlers at VDARE have it right: Trump – “the last chance for White America” – has turned out to be a cucking, elitist, mainstream Establishment Republican disaster.

While the Beavis-and-Butthead gamesters squeal with delight with every Trumpian Twitter “neg’ the adults in the room realize that Trump is squandering all is political capital and is busy dismantling the base that elected him. Who was it again who labeled Trump – from the very beginning – a “vulgar ignorant buffoon?”

More typical Type I “movement” commentary:

Your comment was good until the last five lines. We here on the European continent are under the onslaught of uncontrolled immigration invasion from Eastern Europe.

The hatred e.g. of Poles or Russians toward Germans and Westerners has the same nature of Blacks’ against White Americans: Poles and Blacks have contributed nothing to modern civilisation so they want to destroy it, out of envy and hatred against its creators.

Slavs who didn’t mix with Asians are White, but they are a small minority.

That’s from a comment left at The Occidental Observer.

That’s a story where all sides are stupid. First, the Alt Right and other precincts of Der Movement elevate ditzy female airheads as “movement” celebrities in a form of sex-based affirmative action to go along with the usual ethnic quotas.  Then these females are over-sensitive as well as vacuous.  Finally, the Beavis-and-Butthead brigade behave like typical juvenile jackasses.  Instead of “trolling” these trollops, just ignore them – you are the ones who created them in the first place by paying attention to them simply because they (presumably) have two X chromosomes, breasts, and a vagina.  You real what you sow.

Yeah, Derb, dumb Whites need to discriminate against smart Asians, or else we’ll have all sorts of resentment against them for taking over the top spots in society.

One question though.  If Asians are so much superior, why do they have to emigrate to White countries?  Why is, for example, the USA so much better that Asians come here?  Why, even a low-IQ greasy swarthoid train wreck like Italy has Chinatown infestations. Why do Chinese emigrate to Italy?  

One would have to think that maybe the Asians are not so superior after all, or they’re just invading, either relieve their population pressure or just for imperialistic urges.

In any case, we must resist them.  ALL of them.  Right, Derb?


A complete inversion of reality:


Greg Johnson
Posted December 14, 2017 at 3:35 pm | Permalink
There’s no affirmative action for women in this movement.
Your anger is misplaced.

Of course there is female affirmative action, in addition to the traditional ethnic-based version.  All these giggling, ditzy female airheads are being elevated solely because of their sex.  

Sir MGTOW and the Yeastbuckets

Some sense.

With all the recent hysteria about “women in the movement,” all of the voluminous scribblings and yawn-inducing podcasts, I note that most miss the point that this latest explosion is no doubt at least in part a male reaction to the ongoing “sexual harassment” moral panic burning through the mainstream society.  Indeed, there is the daily auto da fe, in which some screeching yeastbucket, full of moral righteousness and supported by myriads of conformist robots, accuses some hapless man of looking at her the wrong way twenty years ago. To the stake!  Nobody escapes the Spanish Inquisition!

Now, having to put up with these hectoring harridans in the “normie” realm, activist men do not want to have to endure smug, smirking women, and their White Knight enablers, behaving as if they are the SJW HR Department of Der Movement, laying down the law to all of us knuckle-dragging male brutes on how we are to behave to Milady Mudshark, Ganges Girl, Flabby Philosocat, or any of the others.

The reason for the Type I Alt Right “bullying” (and, yes, I’m no fan of their Beavis-and-Butthead activities either) and the Type II Sallisian (intentionally comic, for the autistically obtuse among you) tirades is, frankly, we’ve had enough of female-to male moral posturing.  Why is that so difficult to understand?

Finally someone gets it!

No immunity from criticism.  Get it, Counter-Currents?  Accountability for all, including your delicate little ladies.  

I’m sure you disagree. Always got to side with “da wimmin” though, right?  

A cruder but nevertheless accurate observation on the same topic   (emphasis added):

Weimar Republican
Ah yes the old Philosofat, I mean cat, lecturing men about masculinity, along with the rest of these empty-headed e-sluts. If you idiots are too clueless to see that all these ‘based’ childless cat ladies represent nothing but a feminist coup, then this movement and the white race deserve to die. This tubby bitch gets less than 2k viewers a video and has the audacity to tell critics of feminism to leave the Alt-Right.
Dear White Knights, have some self-respect because nobody else respects you, including these mediocre 4s you are pretending are Aryan maidens in a meadow.
I’m gonna shout from the hills until I’m banned: women are the death of any movement. Look at what they are doing to leftism as we speak. They will spread their #MeToo coup here next. Stop being a bunch of spineless, thirsty beta-orbiters and open your fucking eyes before it’s too late.
Roy Moore was accused by Republican women voters. Women are not political. They side with whoever is the strongest at any given moment. Be strong and they will come on their own. Stop pandering to pussy.

“Mediocre 4s?”  No, no, a thousand times, no!  These are great beauties (the faces that launched a thousand charging White Knights), and obviously – quite obviously, let there be no doubt! – that any criticism of these charming maidens is only – solely! – because all we insecure men are secretly enraged that they refused to go to the high school prom with us.  

Johnson debates “Longshanks” – which a (very interesting) website asserts is a South Asian.  I do not know for sure whether or not the individual identified at that post is really the Aryan warrior “Sven” but if it is, it’s another in a long series of non-Whites pushing a narrative of ultra-purity for Whites, and one can only guess (don’t try too hard, it’s not that difficult) about the underlying motive. There’s not only this (alleged) fellow, but others as well: deranged mestizos (“Sallis’ sophistry”), snarky Iranians (for Aryans!  For Aryans!)…the list goes on.  And since these specimens know how to appeal to Type I Nutzis, there’s always a place for them at the table (no place for Sallis, of course).  Type I Nutzis are really a problem.  We Type II activists are the solution.

And then some female idiot at Counter-Currents, some inane commentator, says that MGTOW is worse than feminism.  Are you mad?  Feminism is one of the major weapons used by the System to destroy the White race and wreck Western civilization; MGTOW is simply a reaction to that.  Now, taken to extremes, MGTOW can be racially destructive (we need to reproduce, after all), but taken to moderation, it can be useful. Instead of White Knighting, and the sweaty pussy pedestalization of “game,” it can serve men well to be more aloof from women, shift the supply-demand curve more to the benefit of men, instead of being one-sided to the advantage of women.  If it comes down to Sir MGTOW vs. the Yeastbuckets, I side with the former against the latter.

And a side note: All these Alt Right guys getting all excited over “Hatreon” – don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched.  Was it necessary to parody Patreon so obviously? Another example of Type I “movement” childishness.