Category: behold the movement

The HBD Threat Revisited

Another prediction.

I see that the infantile fool Dutton is seemingly now a regular on “The McSpencer Show” peddling his usual brew of HBD poison, emphasizing dividing Europeans against each other.

Hey, Dutton, here’s how your 40% hunter-gatherers are doing these days.

HBD is, as I predicted (of course, always being right) making a full court press of infiltrating Der Movement and replacing the original ideals of racialism with HBD pseudoscience.

Orwell:

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.

Sallis:

If you want a vision of the Der Movement’s future, imagine a Chinatrix’s heeled boot stamping on a HBDer’s face forever.

Measured groveling – the battle cry of HBD.

In any case, note that virtually all of the major precincts of Der Movement today – even those in conflict with each other – have been tainted and compromised by HBD: Johnson, Spencer, Taylor, MacDonald, et al. 

Long time readers of EGI Notes will recognize that I’ve been predicting this for the last several years – it is a common theme here, and it is taking place before our very eyes.

Long time readers of this blog also know that I was 100% correct in my prediction that the Alt Right would wreck racial activism and be a complete and utter disaster. It is now quite clear that the ongoing HBD conquest of Der Movement is also going to be a complete and utter disaster, doing incalculable, perhaps irreversible, damage to racial nationalism.  Race-based and kinship-based nationalism will be replaced by intra-European division and animus and a HBD nationalism based on a hierarchical ranking of phenotypic traits designed to divide Whites and promote the interests of Jews and Asians.

Easily manipulated Type I nitwits are useful idiots for the HBD conquest of racial nationalism.

I was virtually alone as a voice on the Far Right openly denouncing the Alt Right at the peak of its power and popularity, predicting its downfall and predicting that that downfall would do incalculable damage to racial activism, because Quota Queens like Spencer and Johnson tied White nationalism to the Alt Right.

Today, the same holds for HBD. Seemingly, I’m the only voice on the Far Right critiquing HBD, and predicting that the HBD cult will do incalculable further damage to (American) racial activism that has already been (fatally?) weakened by the Alt Right fiasco. Please note that it are the same people who brought you the Alt Right disaster who are now promoting HBD in the “movement.”  Is it any surprise that Richard “The Master of Disaster” Spencer is giving a forum to a ranting hysterical neurotic clown who makes podcasts dressed up in Halloween costumes?  Is it any surprise that Greg “The Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all” Johnson is complicit in the HBD cult’s conquest of racial activism?  All YOU guys out there are ultimately responsible, because you buy into the affirmative action premise and give these failed “leaders” passes over and over and over again.

The situation is hopeless. I and the readers here just have to sit back and watch the inevitable disaster unfold, being unable to stop it – just like standing on the sidewalk and seeing a fatal car accident unfold before your eyes.

Get ready for a bumpy ride!

Zman commentator:

…the British went about happily spreading Han and sub-continental Indians as middlemen and sub-Saharan Africans as laborers all over the world, sowing the seeds of demographic crises everywhere they went. No, I don’t think ‘payback’ is a good thing and I hate the destruction of England, but historical fact is historical fact.

But they’re a great benefit to all humanity and we need more men like them!

Zman commentator:

Anonymous Reactionary
Taking to the streets if you don’t actually control the local civil service is how Charlottesville happens.

Exactly what I’ve been saying for years.  That’s why getting involved in pragmatic politics, broadly defined, is so important.

Conservatives don’t even have an ideological grudge against government jobs, which are stable means to support a family. The problem is that affordable family housing, due to usury and housing bubbles, is far away from where government employment is physically located, the cities.

Usury!  Usury!  The Federal Reserve!  How about that White people can’t live in the cities because of the feral Coloreds there?

Yet another Zman commentator: 

Epaminondas
It’s really hard to understand a man like Virginia governor Ralph Northam. He comes from an old Virginia family going back centuries. Why would he throw his own people under the bus?

Why? Precisely because he “comes from an old Virginia family going back centuries.”  He’s a high trust hunter gatherer!  Just like John Lindsay and Hubert Humphrey!  They are of great benefit to all humanity and we need more men like them!

There is a name Southerners use for men like him: scalawag. Northam is a brutal reminder of a kind of treacherous SOB that appears throughout history. Democracy enables these sycophantic creatures to gain power.

Der Movement allows that too.

Behold the female.

The Johnson Conundrum

The resiliency of Greg Johnson: An analysis of a skillful political actor.

Question: How has Greg Johnson not only survived various scandals and other embarrassments but emerged stronger than ever?

After the episode of the Pilleater Chronicles and its fallout and then the revelations about Polignano, folks like Forney were telling us (and this was nearly a year ago) that “Greg Johnson is finished” etc. The whole Forney-Friberg-Spencer anti-Johnson axis (that exists even though they may have squabbles among themselves; e.g., Forney being critical of Spencer) more or less adopted the line that Johnson and Counter-Currents were in terminal decline – “finished”- and  that there was no recovery from the scandals. These types were saying the same thing after Johnson was publicly humiliated by the HopeNotHate Hermansson infiltration, and his having Hermansson give the keynote address at a Counter-Currents meeting.  Then there was the Lewis infiltration.  Any one of these scandals would have been sufficient to delegitimize, perhaps terminally sink, another, less resilient, “movement leader.”  After each of these scandals, Johnson’s leading rivals in the Alt Right loudly predicted his imminent “movement” demise.

They were of course wrong, and Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents continues to go on strongly, raising money, continuing to be “big” in Der Movement – in fact, it is the Forney-Friberg-Spencer faction that seem to be in decline. If there has been any “victor” in the feud, it has been Johnson. Forney continues doing his thing but with very limited influence, Friberg apparently the same, and Spencer is reduced to wrapping himself in the Iranian flag and tweeting about his love life. On the other hand, the destructive Frankenstein monster that is Counter-Currents keeps on lumbering along, and it was Johnson who made international news after being arrested in Norway.  Johnson stands up there with Taylor and MacDonald as among the “Elders” of the (particularly, American) “movement”- I would argue that Greg Johnson’s power and influence within the “movement” has never been greater.

So, how has this happened?  How did Johnson emerge like a phoenix rising out of the ashes from these scandals to reach a pinnacle of influence, despite the scandals, and, perhaps just as importantly, despite the fact that Counter-Currents has displayed a shocking decline in quality, with the most moronic, superficial, hypocritical, pretentious, and juvenile crop of “writers” ever assembled at any one Far Right site?  Counter-Currents should be sliding into Majority Rights-style oblivion and irrelevancy, but, so far, unfortunately, the opposite is happening.

It would be instructive to examine why all of this is so. Such an examination will shed much needed light on Der Movement, and illuminate the underlying rot within that allows someone like Johnson to prosper.  After all consider – Spencer received more criticism, attacks, and disavowals because of the nonsense of Hailgate than did Johnson for the Pilleater and Polignano scandals, which were, at least in my opinion, far worse.

I don’t recall Taylor, Brimelow, and Devlin et al. publicly distancing themselves from Johnson over issues that are far more serious than Spencer acting like an immature jackass.


Some possible reasons for all of that include:

The affirmative action program.  The “movement’s” ethnic affirmative action program is an important factor here. Johnson claims to be of English descent, of founding Old American stock, whose family has been in America since colonial days; he is also phenotypically Nordic.  Now, since Spencer himself is an Anglo-Germanic Nordic, and he has collapsed as an activist, having the proper ancestral (and phenotypic) bonafides is necessary but not sufficient.  One can have the “proper” ancestry and phenotype, but if they crash and burn completely, and are politically inept, nothing will help them. On the other hand, if Johnson was a wop or hunkie – or even possibly a “Nordish” mick – he would have not survived the scandals, regardless of anything else. Ancestry and phenotype are important factors here.

Lesson.  If you don’t have the “right” ancestry, forget about trying to have any influence in Der Movement. If you do have the “right” ancestry, then you really have to be incredibly inept and politically clumsy to fall from grace (e.g., Spencer).

Costs vs. benefits.  Let’s compare Spencer’s Hailgate to Johnson’s scandals with respect to the response (or lack thereof) of other “movement leaders.” I argue that “movement leaders” may well have had practical political reasons for disavowing Spencer while being silent about Johnson, through the weighing of costs vs. benefits.

Hailgate – although in and of itself petty nonsense – became national news because of the Alt Right-Trump connection and because of Spencer’s notoriety at the time, and because of the fact that the 2016 election results were fresh in everyone’s memory. The media leveraged Spencer’s poor judgment to attack other Alt Right leaders as “suit and tie Nazis.” This endangered the status, reputation, and money-making ability of various “leaders” and gave them a very strong motivation to publicly disavow and criticize Spencer. The benefits of disavowing Spencer were clear. What about the costs? These “leaders” probably considered Spencer an immature lightweight and judged that the costs of disavowing Spencer were minimal – Spencer would not, or could not, mount an effective counter-attack against them, and the supporters of these other “leaders” would be unlikely to withdraw support over their Hailgate criticism.

On the other hand, Johnson’s scandals have not been national news and have not directly impacted other major Alt Right figures. These others may have a moral and ethical obligation to criticize Johnson, but what do any of these types care about morals and ethics?  It’s a purely utilitarian consideration for them – there are little practical benefits for disavowing Johnson.  On the other hand, there are real costs. Johnson is a much more dangerous person than is Spencer, and more likely to mount an effective counter-attack. One could imagine Counter-Currents suddenly critiquing Amren over the JQ or once again saying Amren conferences are a waste, or critiquing VDARE’s taking so much “movement” money or once again criticizing Derbyshire, etc.  The same intensity that Counter-Currents focused on the likes of Spencer and Friberg would now be aimed at these other targets.  So, there’s a cost with no practical benefit, and issues of morals and ethics and character mean nothing.  So, these folks give Johnson a “pass” for things worse than what Spencer did.

Lesson. Morals, ethics, and character count for nothing in Der Movement and among “movement leaders.” It is all practical considerations of image, status, and “movement” politics, with a focus on assuring maintenance of supporters and supporter donations.  A well-connected person whose influence is feared by others of like standing can get away with more than someone like Spencer, who is more isolated and is not considered to have the gravitas to be a “heavy player” in the “game.”

The political game.  Johnson, for all his manifest faults, is very, very good at playing the political game – or at least as good as someone who has horrifically bad judgment and who likes feuding can be. Johnson inevitably ends up on bad terms with people in the “movement,” including former allies, but you’ll note that he typically only engages in one major feud at a time.  Former allies may become enemies, and sometimes, typically briefly, vice versa, but these twists and turns occur one at a time. He never engages in any major “two-front war.” Alliances are formed and broken, one feud is engaged in and won, former allies then become foes, new allies are recruited, etc.  Jorjani was used skillfully here – and that was as much the result of Spencer’s political clumsiness and it was Johnson’s skill at using people for just as long as he needs them to undermine his main foes. All these people are used and discarded as fits the agenda, with consummate political skill. As historical analogies, consider Julius Caesar using and discarding Pompey or Augustus doing the same with Marc Antony.  Or how Catherine the Great used and discarded “court favorites” (including lovers) to achieve power. Hitler used and the discarded various people during his rise to power – Eckart, Strasser, Rohm, etc.  One can consider how various organized crime figures rose to prominence through alliances, which they later discarded when it no longer suited them (often killing the former allies).  The Kennedys used Mafia connections to reach the White House, after which Robert Kennedy moved against these former allies. Then there’s the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1939.  You get the picture.

Johnson is also good at “glad-handling” and having friendships with “movement” bigwigs that – for as long as they last before falling apart – provide a cushion of support and prevent those bigwigs from calling out Johnson’s faults. Taylor as an example.  Note that Johnson won’t call out Taylor for “being in bed with the press” (as I note here), while criticizing others. Note that Johnson now supports and attends Amren conferences despite telling us several years ago that attending such meetings was a waste of time and money (money being, of  course, better used for “D’Nations” to Counter-Currents).  Thus, in summary, despite his proclivity to feud, Johnson has still maintained friendly relations with a number of “movement” bigwigs, and that no doubt helps insulate Johnson from the consequences of his manifest failures and various scandals.

Further, whatever what actually happened, the actual “technics” of each accomplishment, the end result was that – if Polignano’s correspondence with Friberg can be believed – Johnson was able to remove Polignano as having any control over Counter-Currents. And John Morgan, originally with Arktos, has ended up with Counter-Currents.  Whether all of this was the result of Machiavellian plotting or just serendipity, one cannot argue with the results. Johnson has weathered all sorts of storms, out-maneuvered rivals, and has a firm control of the Counter-Currents “empire,” such as it is. He therefore is revealed as a reasonably savvy player in the game and art of “movement” politics.  Much better than the likes of Spencer, who, by contrast, is politically clumsy and inept.

Lesson. Being right is not enough to advance your position; being wrong is not enough to retard your progress.  Humans are essentially political animals, and in any grouping that has individuals vying for status and to advance their agendas, political maneuvering will be important.  Johnson is a savvy political operator and thus has not only survived scandals that would have wrecked other prominent activists, but he has prospered while his main rivals (e.g., Spencer) have fallen by the wayside. 


Should activists involved in Der Movement concentrate on such internal politics? The benefits are clear.  What about the costs?  There are costs of time and energy.  There is the mental costs; this can be exhausting, particularly for people who are by nature introverts.  Political maneuvering can always backfire. It also compromises, to some extent, honor and integrity, and, if it is noticed by others, can stain one’s reputation as an honest broker.

A cost-benefit analysis can be done. It depends on context.  An overt and public activist like Johnson has more to gain from politics than someone pseudonymous; however, pseudonymous activists can still benefit. Extroverts have it easier than introverts, but as long as they are not extreme and semi-autistic, introverts can still benefit from politics. The main thing is the affirmative action program.  An activist of Northwest European ancestry – particularly those of British/German/Scandinavian ancestry – can derive great benefit from engaging in “movement” politics since they have great potential for advancement and a rapid rise to leadership. On the other hand, activists of Southern (especially) or Eastern European ancestry  have little or nothing to gain since, regardless of how skilled they may be at the political game, their ancestry bars them from rising to the extent of those from more favored groups. Years of effort can be quickly wiped out by comments about “Moops and Mongols” and other manifestations of “movement” ethnic fetishism. So the relative costs and benefits in this case primarily vary based on their potential benefits, and that varies based on the ancestry of the activist in question. Now, in a truly pan-European movement, this factor would be eliminated, but perhaps there political maneuvering would be somewhat less important than it is in Der Movement.

The cabal and the alliances. Political connections go beyond just one-on-one relationships and include group alliances. There has been talk about a “homosexual cabal” in the “movement” – one that I was warned about as far back as the early 2000s.  There is also the HBD-ethnonationalist-Nordicist alliance. All these groupings, working behind the scenes, can provide crucial support for “movement leaders” who are well-connected.  On the other hand, people like Spencer, more isolated, and whose support is out-in-the –open and very shallow, have no deep support network that can provide a cushion in times of crisis.

Lesson. What goes on behind the curtain is often more important than what goes on in front of it.

The personal revelations. The personal revelations on the Pilleater tape did not have the effects that Forney, Friberg, and company thought, because it was basically an “open secret” in the “movement” for anyone who had a triple digit IQ, and anyone demanding “proof” was basically just engaging in obstructionism or were low-level idiots without any standing in the “movement.” Other aspects of that tape didn’t have much of an impression because things – such as bad behavior at meetings – have been rumored for a long time.  As far as Polignano goes and the revelations in that discussion with Friberg, who in the “movement” really cares about someone with a name like “Polignano” anyway?  Someone named “Johnson” screwing over someone named “Polignano” is a positive in Der Movement, not a negative.

Lesson. What people think is going to have a profound effect upon revelation may not do so, if the revelations are already suspected and/or known, or if the people hearing the revelation actually don’t think what they are hearing is really a bad thing at all.

Ideological flexibility.  Johnson maximizes support with remarkable ideological flexibility – what some would call inconsistency or even hypocrisy.  Johnson is a leading proponent of petty nationalist ethnonationalism – yet Counter-Currents publishes and promotes the work of Francis Parker Yockey and previously hosted some of my own essays promoting pan-Europeanism.  Counter-Currents has both promoted and criticized HBD, has both promoted and criticized Nordicism, has both promoted and criticized racial purity, has both promoted and criticized Amren conferences, has promoted both Traditionalism and Futurism, has White-Knighted as well as run the work of Devlin, Johnson has harshly criticized Derbyshire and then shared the stage with him at Amren – you get the picture.  This maximizes support and lets Johnson have a foot in different “movement” factions.

Lesson. Being two-faced has its advantages.


Practical consistency.  The ideological inconsistency doesn’t bother the Type I retards that constituent the majority of Der Movement, since their own “ideology” is simply a mash-up of Kempian Nordicism, chugging gallons of milk, screaming “Kek!,” etc. Indeed, as stated, the inconsistency is an advantage to maintain appeal among “activists” who are a cut above the dimwit majority and actually do care about ideas, but themselves are still too dim too realize that Counter-Currents has been all over the board on a number of important issues.


More important perhaps is consistency in the practical realm.  Successful activists tend to be ones that consistently are associated with a particular project or group or organization of project.  Taylor with American Renaissance.  Johnson with Counter-Currents.  MacDonald with The Occidental Observer and his various books.  Pierce (and Strom, who has survived controversy of his own) with the National Alliance. On the other hand, the more unsuccessful activists, whose careers are less than the sum of their parts – Spencer and Duke for example – have a history of jumping from one failed project to another.  At some point, I lost track of all of the various groups that Duke formed, led for a few years, and then abandoned. There was the White version of the NAACP (NAAWP), then wasn’t there something called NOFEAR, then EURO, etc?  And that was after his Klan days and his foray into electoral politics.  Spencer has had his varied Alt Right websites sites and the Alt Right corporation, and all sorts of other podcasts and projects, jumping from one to another. All of this failure and inconsistency  does not inspire confidence. On the other hand, stability such as Johnson with Counter-Currents gives him an air of “competence” and is another reason he survives scandal better than Spencer.

Conclusion. This is by no means a comprehensive analysis, but touches upon what I see as some of the main reasons why Johnson has survived and prospered, while Spencer has imploded.  Of course, some of it is just better judgment – Johnson had the good sense not to be involved in Unite the Right.  But, still, comparing the flak that Spencer got for Hailgate compared to Johnson thriving after scandal begs for an explanation – that I have tried to supply.  As further events unfold, more such analysis may be forthcoming.


The underlying lessons here demonstrate the importance of political networking, and various non-merit attributes, in elevating and sustaining individuals in positions of prominence in Der Movement. They provide a blueprint for “activists” with the proper affirmative action-approved ancestral backgrounds to follow to effectively play the political game, and allow others to better understand how they are being “played” by the “leaders” they so blindly support.


Johnson is not going anywhere; he is seemingly here to stay. Although there are some in the “movement” who will never accept him, enough others will so as to ensure that he will be a force within Der Movement for years to come, barring any unforeseen circumstances. And it is difficult to imagine what such circumstances could occur that would dethrone Johnson from his “leadership” position. Given the previous incidents and scandals that have proven unable to do so. As we can see, Amren continues to peddle Johnson’s work. One can expect that Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents will continue to have a significant impact on racial activism and prove the predictions of Forney false.


In any case, we can hope this analysis provokes more discussion and debate and, perhaps, soul-searching among “movement” “activists” with respect to their “leadership.”

The Once and Future Year: 2019-2020

Looking back and ahead.

Questions/predictions for 2019 made here a year ago. Let’s review some of them.

Is the new focal point of the American “movement” in 2019 going to be the Alt Wrong?  Is the new focus the emerging Counter-Currents-Amren-VDARE-TOO-HBD axis?  How much damage will that do to the “movement” before it collapses as did its Alt Right predecessor?

Essentially, this has continued with Counter-Currents continuing to shill for HBD.

Question: Will the Silkers make peace with the Alt Wrong, and look the other way as regards Jewish influence, as long as Asian interests are being served?

No, not yet.

Question: Will the Alt Wrong be so clumsy – and not quite as optics-friendly as I wrote above – that they’ll let Jews and Asians play a more direct and public role in White racial activism?

Well, not really, although Unz is still lurking behind the scenes.

Who is going to be the “mainstream movement” opposition to the Alt Wrong? Will Strom finally – finally! – speak out against Jew/Asian worshipping HBD?  

No, he has not yet done so.

Or will the Alt Wrongers try to appease the WN 1.0 by appealing to their vanity and ethnic fetishism?  

Well, yes, they always do this. Particularly, Durocher writing for Unz with his warmed over hyper-Nordicism is the perfect example here.  Devlin in Counter-Currents writing about HBD is another clear example of this.

Who will Greg Johnson feud with next?  

Pilleater. I also note that Polignano vanished from an overt association with Counter-Currents after Friberg’s revelations about Polignano’s comments about Johnson.

Will the Alt Wrong alliance last through the end of 2019?

Yes, it did.

Who is the next prominent HBDer to either die and/or be exposed as was Rushton?  Will 2019 be the year of Lynn?

No, unfortunately not.

What will be the next sex scandal in Der Movement?  Will it happen in 2019? Heterosexual?  Homosexual? Bisexual?  Transgender?  Inter-racial?  Adultery/cuckoldry?  Pedophilia? S and M?  Bestiality?  Necrophilia? Some combination thereof?

Which Way Trumpian Man?  Will 2019 lead to impeachment?  

Yes.

What outrageous errors will the Quota Queens make in 2019?  What leftist will they label an “alpha shitlord” (trust the phyzz!)?  

All the errors were documented here throughout the year.  As far as leftist “alpha shitlords” – leftist Hubert Humphrey, essentially – we need more men like him, according to Counter-Currents.

What leftist academic or movie director will they label “a man of the Right?” 

No one – not that I noticed.  This didn’t happen.

One can imagine some Old Kingdom Egyptian mummies getting gene-tested as 85% Middle Eastern and 15% sub-Saharan African, and the peanut gallery will declare – “Arthur Kemp was right!”  The mind boggles!  Possibilities, possibilities!

We had the Rome paper  That has been so far essentially ignored by Der Movement, for reasons that should be obvious reading my summary of the findings.

Prediction: White women will continue acting badly in 2019, and Johnson will continue to mumble about “Joan of Arc.”  It’s sort of like Whites and Blacks – the men who defend women the most are the ones who have the least experience and interactions with them.

Greta Thunberg – the heroine of Counter-Currents (and of Durocher). Then we had O’Meara lecturing heterosexual men about their attitudes toward women at Counter-Currents.

Also, we saw that the testing companies continued to be exposed as shilling a majestically flawed product.

Looking ahead:

I am not going to make predictions about the 2020 Presidential election after the error I made back in 2016.  I will say that I expect Trump will continue to be a fraud and he may shift right in his campaign rhetoric in order to fire up his dispirited base.

I expect that Counter-Currents will continue its sad decline with respect to content – we’ll be seeing more of the likes of Jeelvy in the year to come. Johnson will continue to be Gaslighting Greg.  Johnson will – especially if Trump wins – pretend he never wrote that “Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what.”

The HBDers – both the Jeurasian and Nordicist factions – will continue to lie about race and racial science.

Spencer disavowing the Far Right in 2020 – 50:50 chance.  

I predict that one of the following – Johnson, Spencer, AIM – will suffer some sort of major defeat or embarrassment or failure in 2020.

I predict that attempts will be made to revive the Alt Right – in spirit if not in name – due to the Trump campaign, but that it’ll be a farce.

I predict that there is some sort of ongoing, significant infiltration of the Far Right going on right now, but whether it’ll be overtly discovered in 2020 is unknown.  A (unlikely, in my opinion) possibility is that the infiltration will be announced at such a time and in such a manner to attempt to harm Trump’s re-election chances, although this is just pure speculation (I’m not confident about the timing. I am confident that something is going on, but when the other shoe will drop, it is hard to say).  

Given the upcoming election, we can expect more embarrassing endorsements, obsessions, and disavowals from the candidates concerning people such as Princess Tulsi Coconut and Andy Eggroll.  At the same time, the Quota Queens, moving forward past the election, will pretend that they never endorsed a non-White woman who supports reparations for Negroes (Duke with Coconut) and promoted both Coconut as well as a White-hating Chinaman who wants to buy off White acceptance of their racial dispossession with $100 per month (Spencer and Johnson with Eggroll).

After the Greta Thunberg and Hubert Humphrey comedies, who will be the next “Nordish” leftist to be praised by the likes of Counter-Currents (‘we need more people like them”) or Durocher (“a great benefit to all humanity”)?  John Lindsay?  George McGovern?  Bill Clinton?  

We will likely see more evidence, more surface manifestations, of the “movement” version of “the deep state” – the intersection between the homosexual cabal, the HBDers, the Nordicists, etc. Every once in a while some sign emerges of this, like a flash of lightning in a dark stormy sky, illuminating the hidden realities.


And of course we end the year much as we started it,with the usual “movement” nonsense, with a few breaks of sanity mixed in.  Thus:


Derbyshire weeps.  From a sane Counter-Currents commentator:

ia
Posted December 29, 2019 at 6:24 am | Permalink
I have lived in China. It’s an ecological disaster zone, a pollution nightmare denuded of all wild animals. They routinely torture animals. For example, feeding pigs strychnine in order to cause weight gain before selling for human consumption. They use the body parts of various animals in teas. An example would be tiger parts to give them courage. They are behind the poaching throughout the 3rd world.

Because of their routine abuse of dogs there was an outbreak of rabies in one province. The Chinese authorities had men clubbing any dog they found and throwing its half-dead body in a truck bed. They killed 50,000 dogs this way. In one town the Chinese hung two dogs in the public square.

Yes, let’s emulate the Chinese.

Hey!  Watch it now (from the same source thread:

Victor Henderson
Posted December 28, 2019 at 5:23 pm | Permalink
Dont be too ethousiatic…..i feel like many white ethno-nationalist are really underestimating non-whites and especially the whole notion of black people having a low IQ which based on my own observations are far from the truth. The poverty in africa is also been made bigger then it really is, as France is one the major factors to african poverty in its formor colonies. The jews are succesful as group because they have religous comminality and majority come from german-jewish backgrounds which is aslo a factor…Spielberg, Zuckenberg, Weinstein etc all Germans. Here in western Europe i see many groups of west african orgin/heritage doing extremly well and scoring high on academic levels higher then the natives whites and east asians and exeeding well. . I also feel we are to focused on black this and that….while east asians have taken over population wise places like Australia, New Zealand, Canada and parts of west coast america and Europe. The chinese are making major moves behind the scenes. At the same time muslims from middle east, north africa and asia are getting babies left and right in Europe. These things have to be discussed more in essence. Many muslims are focused on dominanting the west and the same with asians and in particular the Chinese diaspora community.

Reply
Astra
Posted December 29, 2019 at 1:54 pm | Permalink
Best comment. Please, someone must write an article about this, or a series of them. Especially about asians and their developments. It’s so underestimated, but they should be feared for a reason. It does not look well at all. We are so few.

Some people are not getting the HBD and Silker memo.  East Asians taking over is the WHOLE POINT of HBD.  Chinese diaspora community?  The Silkers openly declared that they want colonies of East Asians living in the “West,” with black-booted Chinese girls with guns as “the border guards of the West.”  


Thus, the lead Silker expressed himself thus:

Sacrosanct European territories in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand will likely need to become smaller at any rate in order to be maintained and defended. But with the increased manageability of defense will come an opportunity to offer cooperation to Asians to have some sacrosanct territories of their own in these places.  

We already have Chinatowns. Now there could be some intermittently disbursed along the borders of the Mediterranean and among European cities with border and migrant control an explicit part of their mandate.

They not only OPENLY STATED that, but provided photos of what they perceive their Asian masters (dominatrices?) to be. Long time readers of this blog will remember and know of what I write.  


There are factions of Der Movement that have the fairly open goal of subordinating Whites to Asians (and/or Jews). So what’s the surprise about any of it now?


Sounds like a description of Der Movement.

Here’s a very easy prediction for 2020: Expect more outrageous hypocrisy from Counter-Currents.


Counter-Currents: The absolute worst, most outrageously hypocritical Far Right site on the Internet. Oh yes, let’s preach the wonders of “ethnonationalism” and “petty nationalism” while engaging in ethnosupremacist ethnoimperialism, living in the nations of other peoples and taking their women.


What is it about Counter-Currents that attracts all of the ethnoimperialist hypocrites in Der Movement?

I’m at the airport right now. Being in Eastern Europe for the past two years, I’ve spent a lot of time at various European airports. In regards to my personal life, I’ve found myself in a revolving cycle of meeting Eastern European women on Tinder, taking them on dates to the local IKEA, and then breaking up and saying goodbye to them at the airport…Without divulging too much personal information, I’ll simply focus on some relationships I had with women that I dated in Ukraine, Latvia, and Hungary.

Yeah…should we take bets whether this person is of Ukrainian or Latvian or Hungarian ancestry?  Even if he is of one of these ancestries, what about the others?  If he’s mixed, that’s not the original stock as per petty nationalist purity. Therefore, it is 100% certain that he violated the ethnic homogeneity of at least two of those nations.


In summary, Counter-Currents is Ground Zero of ethnoimperialist violation of the ethnoracial sovereignty of European nations.

The Big Lie

First, meet Terentius Neo.  Then we’ll get to the other lies.

The usual suspects in Der Movement (e.g., Kemp) have used the portrait of Terentius Neo to pontificate about non-European admixture in Roman Italy from “slaves and immigrants.” The usual paradigm is that Neo’s appearance reflects alien ancestry while his (assumed) wife reflects “native Roman-Italian ancestry.”  Evidence of such ancestries?  It is just that the fetishists “eyeball” the fresco and make a judgment based on their personal opinion?

Let’s consider what we know about this Neo family.  Emphasis added:

The fresco depicts a pair of middle-class Pompeians believed to be man and wife. Terentius Neo was a baker as the house had been modified to include a bakery, and the portrait shows the couple as equal members of a confident and fashionable mercantile class. The man wears a toga, the mark of a Roman citizen, and holds a rotulus, suggesting he is also involved in local public and/or cultural events. The woman is in the foreground and holds a stylus and wax tablet, emphasising that she is of equal status, educated and literate.

Neo was a Roman citizen during a time when the citizenship was not universal (the destruction of Pompeii was almost 150 years before the Edict of Caracalla).  Could he have been the son of a freedman?  Possibly, but what possible reason to assume so except that the Kempians don’t like his physical appearance? He was not only a citizen, and a professional for that era, but also someone likely “involved in local public and/or cultural events.” That does not prove anything, but it certainly is not inconsistent with being of native stock.  Or is the “Neo” that makes one assume a freedman assumed a Roman name?

See this.  Someone on the Internet vacillates between asserting a Samnite origin (native Italic stock) and about Neo being a freedman – a freedman in the first century AD who is not only a Roman citizen but is also likely involved in “local public and/or cultural events.” The Samnite hypothesis – itself speculation – seems more plausible. Indeed, it seems like the main rationale for speculating about an exotic origin here, besides the speculation about the name, is the idea that “gee, Terentius Neo doesn’t look like all those Anglo-Saxon actors playing Ancient Romans in the movies and on TV.” 

Bottom line – we don’t know the origins of the man (or his supposed wife, for that matter – maybe he’s the native and she’s the alien?  He could be a freedman, but it seems unlikely that a freedman would be a publicly active Roman citizen in the first century AD.  Was he the son of a freedman?  Anything is possible, but if the only criterion is – “he doesn’t look like Charlton Heston playing Marc Antony,” then that’s not good enough.  For all we know, he was a native Italic.

Putting aside the ethnoracial provenance of Terentius Neo, there’s a more fundamental issue here.

The typical “movement” paradigm has been that the original peoples of Italy, including (and especially) the Romans, were fairer and “more northern” (Nordic) compared to modern Italians, thought to be darker and “more Mediterranean” due to “admixture with Afro-Asiatic “slaves and immigrants.”  

However, what if the opposite is true?  What if modern Italians, particularly North and Central (where the Germanic influx from late Antiquity through the Middle Ages was greatest), are actually fairer and “more northern” than the ancients? Even in the South, to a lesser extent, this may be true as well, given Norman inputs.

The Normans expanded from northern France to a number of regions, including Sicily and the southern portion of the Italian Peninsula (and even sacked the city of Rome in 1084), where they established the Kingdom of Sicily (3, 36).

Then there were the earlier Vandal invasions, and the settlement of Sicily by mainland Italians, including North Italians, as well as other Europeans, after the Muslim population was relocated to the mainland after the Morabit rebellion and its aftermath.  The key point is the possibility that the ancients were actually “darker and more Mediterranean” than the moderns, rather than the reverse. Let’s consider my summary of the functional gene analysis from the Roman genetic paper:

Figure S29 gives functional allele frequency data, which mirrors the general genetic data. For example, throughout most of Roman history, lactase persistence is low, and increases only toward the end periods, starting with Late Antiquity, precisely those periods that have samples exhibiting the most haplotype sharing with “Central and Northern Europe.” Blue eye color was highest in the earliest (Mesolithic) and latest (Late Antiquity and Medieval and Early Modern) Roman periods; Iron Age/Republic and the Imperial periods look similar.  Hair color was not studied.

The three skin pigmentation graphs show varying line curves, but the trend is lighter skin as one progresses through time, rather than the reverse – the fairest seems to be the Late Antiquity/Middle Ages period – there certainly does not seem to be any differences between Iron Age/Republic and Empire, apart from the previously mentioned trend that goes against “movement” dogma.


The functional data, combined with the ancestry data, are compatible with the idea that the ancients were at least as “dark and Mediterranean” as the moderns, if not more so.  There is zero evidence for the reverse – Der Movement’s idea of the ancients being “fairer and more Nordic.”  

These posts about Rome, Napoleon, etc., we have seen here and at Western Destiny recently, although interesting in their own right, are more a means to an end rather than an end in themselves. And that end is the deconstruction of the “movement,” to expose Der Movement, Inc. as intellectually, factually, morally, spiritually bankrupt, as a conglomeration of liars, grifters, sweaty fetishists, and pseudoscientists unable to ever admit being wrong, a stronghold of ineffective incompetents, affirmative action cases who hide their ineptness and intellectual vacuity behind a screen of slogans and fossilized dogma. The “movement” is a pathetic failure, a bunch of frauds and liars, and all of you should eschew it and help build a New Movement.

That’s the end.  All these posts are the means to that end.

Meanwhile, all you Type I Nutzis will continue getting lied to, and you’ll believe it all.

You will be told that Blacks have higher serum testosterone than Whites and other races, even though peer-reviewed scientific studies prove otherwise. You will be told that the Ancient Romans, Greeks, and even Egyptians (!) were Nordic, even though ancient DNA studies continue to disprove those ahistorical inventions. You will be told that Rome collapsed because of “racial degeneration” so that the people “didn’t know how the big stone thingy worked anymore,” while the reality is that as the Western Empire declined and fell the genetics of Rome moved in a more “northern” and “western” direction and that the “big stone thingy” was working fine until the Germans came in, destroyed the Western Empire, and plunged Europe into a centuries-long Dark Ages (and it is only in this post-Roman period, that was German-ruled, that we find a lack of piped water). You’ll be told that the original Romans were individualistic northern hunter-gatherers even though the genetic data suggests a mostly Neolithic farmer ancestry and an overall Mediterranean (mostly West Mediterranean but with some Central and East Mediterranean components) racial provenance.  The fact that the height of power of the Empire was associated with a shift in the genetics of Rome to the “south” and “east” (I’m not saying that this shift was good, it is true that maladaptive population replacement took place within the city of Rome itself and in immediately surrounding areas, but I’m just reporting the historical and genetic facts) is something the “movement” will NOT tell you. They will lie to you about individualism and collectivism in Europe, confuse amoral familism with collectivism, and tell you one minute that Sweden is highly individualistic and in the next minute that it is a collectivist “unimind” with a “shame culture.”  You will be told that Rushton is a truth-telling hero, while his fellow HBDer Dutton (himself a buffoon who calls others neurotic while he behaves like a semi-retarded five year old with attention deficit disorder) admits that Rushton was a fraud and a hypocrite. Lynn will lie to you about IQ with his absurd and unscientific “estimates,” while being out-argued by an African. You will be told that everyone on the Far Right was part of the Alt Right and all blindly supported Trump, even though I was openly attacking the Alt Right and calling Trump a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” and a “Negrophilic race cuck” as far back as 2016. You will see the “movement” agonize over MENA admixture in Southern Europe while either ignoring North Asian/Siberian/East Asian admixture in Northern Europe or labeling the latter as “a great benefit to all humanity.” It is LIE after LIE after LIE, distortion after distortion, endless fraud and grifting – they even have the nerve to lie to you that the only thing the “movement” needs is money, after wasting millions of dollars given to them by suckers like you.

It is THE BIG LIE.

And you’ll only see it exposed here.

Oslo Fiasco and MGTOW

Two topics.

First, a brief fisking.

The Scandza Forum is a nationalist metapolitical organization that has put on conferences in Sweden…

The Land of the Gods.  Well, if we are talking about HBD, I thought the Land of the Gods was China?  Make up your minds, guys.

…Norway, and Denmark. 

Sweden, Norway, and Denmark…along with England and Germany, the entirety of Europe for Der Movement.

Until recently, I had spoken at every Scandza Forum event. But on Saturday, October 12, 2019, I was prevented from speaking at The Scandza Forum’s second conference in Copenhagen by a raging mob of Communists (complete with the Soviet flag).

So, the reasonable thing of course was just to immediately go to the next conference three weeks later.

Then, on Saturday, November 2, I was prevented from speaking at the second Scandza conference…

I’m shocked, shocked, I say.

Scandza’s inaugural event in Oslo, on July 1, 2017, was the first of its type in Norway, and our Norwegian friends were anxious for us to come back. The theme of the new conference was “Human Biodiversity,” i.e., the variations in genetic potential between the sexes and races. 

That’s not in practice true.  HBD, in reality, is a political movement meant to replace kinship-based racial activism with a inter-racial alliance based on IQ and other traits, with Jews and Northeast Asians at the top of the hierarchy.

Human biodiversity undermines the bedrock assumption of modern egalitarianism, namely that differences in social outcomes between the races and sexes can be explained by mutable human ideas and institutions, so that by changing ideas and institutions, we can arrive at an egalitarian society. 

Oh yes.  In other words, it is right and proper that Jews and Chinamen dominate “Western” societies.

If, however, different social outcomes are based on biological differences, then they will persist even after all forms of unequal treatment are removed. Past that point, egalitarian social engineering projects are based on delusions and can only increase the miseries of the world.

The idea of White self-determination is a delusion.  It is only right and proper that Whites be subjugated to Jews and Chinese.  This is all putting aside that HBD is a pseudoscience that does not do hypothesis testing, but lies and manipulates facts to support political agendas.

The speakers included Dr. Kevin MacDonald, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach, talking about his new book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition…

Discussed here previously, exposed as warmed-over Kempism and illogical scholarship.

Dr. Helmuth Nyborg, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Aarhus and a prolific author of scientific books and articles; and Dr. Edward Dutton, editor of Mankind Quarterly and author of many books and articles.

Dutton…you know, Greg, the guy who labelled your buddy Rushton as a fraud and a thug.

My talk was entitled “The Very Idea of White Privilege.” I argue that the science of human biodiversity undermines the idea of white privilege as used by the Left…

Does it?  According to HBD, Whites should be completely enslaved by Jews and Chinamen.  But we are not completely there yet (maybe except for Derbyshire) …unfair White Privilege!

…but I also argue that there is a sense of white privilege that is grounded in human biodiversity—namely, that whites naturally create societies that are more comfortable for whites than other races—but that this is inevitable, and there is nothing morally objectionable about it. (I will publish this speech on Counter-Currents.)

Wonderful.

This is a complete inversion of the truth…

Sort of like HBD, huh?

Naturally, I was a bit worried about this, for when Marxists lie, people die—many millions of people, actually.

And when HBDers lie, pro-White racial activism dies.

But these were not guys to be trifled with. 

I’m sure they are just as tough going into non-White “no go zones,” eh?

Third, I was being detained and deported not for something I said or did, but for something that somebody else might do after hearing my speech. And remember that my speech was on white privilege, a topic that I feared was more likely to produce boredom than violence.

Likely correct.

Fourth, one of Breivik’s arguments for resorting to terrorism was the Norwegian establishment’s suppression of freedom of speech about immigration and multiculturalism. My talk could not in any way be construed as a call for political violence. But suppressing my freedom of speech is precisely the kind of policy that encourages desperate people to commit acts of terrorism. As John F. Kennedy said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” Breivik repeated this idea, almost word for word, during his trial. Will these people ever learn?

I have been making those very same points for months here.

Fifth, I knew that arresting and deporting me would bring enormous publicity, significantly increasing my audience.
I found myself rubbing my hands together in glee.

More “D’Nations!”

I told the police that since the conference was over and it was no longer possible to give my talk, I wanted to leave Norway immediately. They seemed a bit surprised by this, probably because they are used to dealing with foreign freeloaders who will do anything to delay deportation.
I told them that I did not want to return to the United States. Instead, I wanted to go to Portugal…

Hey, going to Africa is always interesting, right?

After a couple of hours, I was summoned to speak to my attorney—or, as it turned out, the assistant to my attorney. I was introduced to a young woman who looked Persian or Kurdish. 

Obviously an Afrowop.

Second:

Attention “movement” white knighters.

See this.

Der Movement prefers the top picture.

The end result of allowing women into the “movement.”  And, no, contrary to what some of you may believe, that is not – not! – a film of Derbyshire engaging in “measured groveling” to “Rosie.”

MGTOW saves lives.

The Alt Right Killed American Racial Activism

Who killed the “movement?”

Der Movement marches on.  I will assume for the sake of argument that the recording actually is what it is purported to be, and not a hoax. If it is a hoax, then Spencer should take legal action against Yiannopoulos (*). I would like to point out that this is a lose-lose situation for racial activism (as usual for Der Movement).  If the recording is true then all conclusions we can make about it and what it says about the “movement” and its “leadership” are 100% on point, AND it also exposes the utter lack of judgment of Der Movement for ever having anything to do with the likes of Yiannopoulos to begin with (*).  If the recording is a hoax, then this underscores even more strongly the horrific bad judgment of Der Movement about Yiannopoulos and the whole “big tent” strategy of allying with the Alt Lite (that, if you remember, I openly denounced at the time, while others, like Johnson, were enthusiastically supporting it.  Gee…guess who was right and who was wrong).

It is not clear why Spencer was blaming Jews and black people for the death.

Yiannopoulos is being a disingenuous jackass there.  Spencer had every right to be angry and every right to blame “Jews and black people”- as well as the city of Charlottesville – for the fatty’s death, and for all the negativism that stuck to the Alt Right after that. Regardless of what we may think of the wisdom of the Unite the Right rally, and how it was organized, the fact is that it was legal. The Type I numbnuts were fully within their legal rights to be there.  By itself, the rally would not have been violent, and no one would have died.  The problems were caused, wholly, by the “anti-racist” protesters – that not only included Jews and Blacks in their ranks but who had Jewish and Black “anti-racist leadership” backing – AND by the Charlottesville authority’s disgusting display of both inaction as well as support and enabling of the protests (for which they were criticized by many people, not only on the Right).

However, all of that said, if the recording is accurate, being (justifiably) angry is not an excuse for a leader to start ranting like a deranged madman, making comments that fully support the “White supremacist” “crazed hater” smear of White nationalism.  Two wrongs don’t make a right. Antifa and Charlottesville, in any fair assessment of blame, are ultimately responsible for the death of the Lipid Queen.  That in no way justified the demented rant captured on the recording (that, by the way, does Spencer’s legal arguments in the civil suit no good).

If you remember, I defended Spencer after Hailgate, writing that while it was a mistake, showing poor judgment (what else is new), it wasn’t that big of a deal. In retrospect, I was in error (I do admit error), because I see a clear connection between Hailgate and this recording (again assuming it is true and accurate).  Complete lack of self-control (Hey!  I though these big-brained northern hunter gatherer types had stoic discipline and all those gesticulating swarthoid manlets rant and rave?), poor judgment, immaturity, a lack of balance, an inability to plan for contingencies (Hey!  I thought “evolving in the harsh northern winters” made all these societal consensus guys masters of careful planning?), poor optics, and the whole Beavis-and-Butthead atmosphere of the Alt Right, all on display.  This all, by the way, does nothing but make me believe that all of Pilleater’s accusations about these guys (*) were factual.

This whole episode clearly demonstrates once again why the Alt Right collapsed, and why it took American racialism down with it. Even if the recording turns out to be a hoax, it still demonstrates that, because all of this Alt Right-Alt Lite infighting (and the original associations to the Alt Liters) was an easily avoidable mistake (as was the entire Unite the Right fiasco) and the Alt Right and its “leaders” have to take responsibility for it. They wanted a big tent. It was Johnson who told us, with his typical bombastic certainty, that “the Alt Right was White nationalism or nothing at all.” These guys tied the Alt Right to the Alt Lite, and then they tied the Alt Right to White nationalism. They wrecked American White nationalism, and that is true regardless of whether the recording is accurate or not.  It is either a “rock star” public relations disaster or it is an Alt Lite hoax (I believe the former).

Ah, all you rank-and-file morons out there…I warned you about the Alt Right. I warned you that Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism would wreck (American) racial nationalism. And as all the Quota Queens – including Boomers making fools of themselves – jumped on the Alt Right train, I sounded the warning, as far back as 2016. I was right, but I was – as usual – ignored. Enjoy the fruits of your conformist following of your “leaders,” all you Type I rank-and-file retards. Enjoy it long and hard. And, yes, let’s hear more about the dastardly “Boomers” and how superior WN 2.0 is to WN 1.0.  Unite the Right was a Millennial escapade, with a thin veneer of Generation X Millennial wanna-bes in positions of authority.  I was admonished that “you don’t understand the youth culture.” On the contrary, I understand it all too well.  

I also have been warning you about the dangers of ethnic affirmative action in racial activism, particularly with respect to positions of leadership. I have been ignored about that as well. And I’ve been proven right time and again (simultaneously, we have this incident as well as Johnson coming back to America with his tail between his legs, having gone to another Scandza conference after the Denmark fiasco).

More embarrassing humiliation brought to you by the Type I affirmative action crowd.

Look at the litany of woe just in the last few days.  White nationalist leader arrested in Norway and deported!  White supremacist accused of conspiring to attack synagogue!  Calls for Twitter to ban Spencer after secret recording is leaked!

But, no worries. I’m sure that when even worse disasters occur in Der Movement in the coming months, these defeats and humiliations will be forgotten. After all,your “leadership” provide to you a never-ending supply of humiliating defeat.

So, Zman discusses how bad things are now, and how open activism is impossible (*). Whose fault is that, Zman?  Who took the golden opportunity offered by the rise of right-wing populism under Trump and completely squandered it?  Who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory? Who is it who is ALWAYS WRONG and ALWAYS INEPT and ALWAYS DEMONSTRATING PISS-POOR JUDGMENT?  Thar’s your guys, my dear Zman, all your Alt Right heroes, all your “movement” “rock stars,” all your Type Is, all your affirmative action “leaders.”  All YOU people who eagerly jumped on the Alt Right train and stood firmly on it until it crashed – YOU are responsible.  So stop whining now, and admit your complicity in the collapse.  And admit that the “crazy and bitter” Ted Sallis was 100% absolutely correct. Admit it was Ted Sallis who clearly saw that the Alt Right was a danger to racial activism and that it would lead racialism in America to the abyss – and predicted that at the height of the Alt Right’s peak, in 2016 and early 2017.  But you can’t admit that, as it would make your entire “movement” house of cards collapse.  So keep on pretending that the situation is just what it is, as a result of nefarious forces of web-spinning effete males and frustrated cat ladies, with no responsibility for a failed “movement” and its meritless affirmation action leadership. Dishonest scum.

*This action by Yiannopoulos reminds me of Pilleater’s (possibly illegal) recording of his call with Johnson and the release of it.  On the one hand, those two did all of us a service by exposing things that we should really know. On the other hand, I have complete contempt for their despicable and dishonorable behavior (and it is perhaps not a coincidence that one is homosexual and the other bisexual). There were certain “movement” events that I have been aware of, which would have made certain heroes look bad (and would do nothing but support my criticisms of these people), but I have kept silent. Maybe exposing these things would be a service, but still I do not believe it to be the right thing to do.  I would not have done what Yiannopoulos and Pilleater have done.  But having done it, and having all of that out now in the public domain, we all have a responsibility to evaluate it and its meaning.

**This is not necessarily true; Amren still is able to run their conferences (for whatever good they do).  

Orwell 2019

Scandza and other issues.

This is the reality we are rapidly headed to – with “thoughtcrime” now being about race.

Read this from CNN.

Bernsen said Johnson’s arrest, and similar actions “are part of how we prevent attacks, such as the one we saw in New Zealand, from happening here as well.”

Rewritten for realism:

Bernsen said Johnson’s arrest, and similar actions “are part of how we promote attacks, such as the one we saw in New Zealand, from happening here again and again, by preventing people from engaging in non-violent political activism and making them desperate.”

A question: Given Bernsen’s reasoning, can we prevent Islamic terrorism by arresting and deporting Muslims who enter the Norway?

Richard

Posted November 3, 2019 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

It’s becoming comical how Leftist media outlets such as the Commie News Network (CNN) have covered this story by continuing to defame Dr. Johnson as a “white supremacist” who was arrested at a “far-right” conference in Norway? Again, who are we trying to “rule” over?

Perhaps the ongoing false labeling and smear campaigns would justify legal action for defamation of character? Wouldn’t there be grounds for civil recourse since this involves the media rather than an online publisher such as in the case of Taylor v. Twitter?

Sue CNN.  Johnson is not a “white supremacist.” Indeed, in my opinion, anyone involved with anti-White HBD, by definition cannot be a “white supremacist.”

More moronic “movement” madness:

Jb

Posted November 3, 2019 at 11:40 am | Permalink

This Just provides more evidence that the establishment is losing its grip and cannot win the arguments and therefore must resort to force/violence. nothing is more legitimizing to this movement then the violence from the establishment.

I suppose that stupidity falls under the “when handed lemons make lemonade” category, but it is asinine nevertheless.  Being constantly defeated and humiliated is not legitimizing. Ultimately, only success is legitimizing.  Victory is legitimizing. What happened to Greg is not.

SidVic

Posted November 2, 2019 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

Outrageous. Where have my Vikings gone?

There’s always Greta Thunberg, right fetishists?

Richard

Posted November 2, 2019 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

These outlandish actions against you further validate that we’re winning and unstoppable.

Yes sir!  The “movement” is defeated and humiliated at every turn, has been on a downward spiral since Charlottesville Ragnarok, is being censored and deplatformed at every opportunity, and the sincere man of genuine greatness Antifa Don Trump has turned out to be a leftist fraud who has his DOJ persecute his own supporters. Certainly that is all validation that Der Movement is winning and unstoppable!

Some more delusion.  Yes sir, police and Antifa on the defensive…until the next Scandza meeting, where they’ll just do the something again, and again be wildly successful.  Come on guys, didn’t your hero Spengler say “optimism is cowardice?”

Read this.  Johnson’s defenders will say that he wasn’t warned beforehand; he wasn’t banned from Denmark on his previous trip. True, but Antifa prevented him from getting into the Denmark conference. The probability was high that something would go wrong, particularly given the laughable failures of all the “extreme vetting” brought to us by all the big-brained societal consensus guys. Maybe they are just a little too much “high trust?”  Scandza, Scandza, my high trust northern hunter gatherers for a Scandza!

Question: If a White football player had tweeted anti-Negro slurs and threats to Negro commentators, and tweeted in uniform no less, do you think the team reaction would simply be to settle the matter “internally?”  Gotta love that Black Privilege, huh?