Category: Brimelow

Charlottesville Ragnarok


Solidarity with Unite the Right, with caveats.

While I have often expressed my disagreement with the Alt Right, and my wish that the Alt Right goes into the dustbin of “movement” history, and while I would have done things differently, I still stand in solidarity with people who share most of my basic beliefs and who showed the intestinal fortitude to put themselves on the line in this rally.  Also, there is some “professional courtesy” involved for Spencer, etc.  I was involved in racial activism while Spencer was finishing high school, I have many years invested in this, and, like it or not, Spencer is one of, if not the, leading figure on the American Far Right today.  I’m not going to throw Spencer under the bus (unlike some of his Alt Wrong buddies), but a critical analysis needs to be made of all of this. This is just an initial “day after” view; as more information comes in, and the dust settles a bit, I’ll likely have more to say.  I’ll also very interested to read what Spencer’s Far Right critics have to say about this issue, as well.

In the short term, this is a mess and will have negative consequences (note that there are never negative consequences for anything the Left does, but the fact that the System is stacked against the Right is part of our “awakening,” is it not?  You play the cards you are dealt).  In the long term, who knows?  If the Right is cowed and stops holding rallies – either because they want to “lay low” or if they cannot get a permit – then it’s a longer term defeat. If more rallies will be held, and Kessler has indicated he wants to have more, then if the same chaos occurs – chaos without objective as opposed to the targeted chaos I support – then that’s a defeat as well.

That’s another reason the falling out between Johnson and Spencer is so bad: Johnson could have been a voice of reason within the Alt Right, advising prudence against the Beavis-and-Butthead antics of the Alt Right rank and file and their still-too-immature leadership.

One would hope that before this rally, all the major stakeholders got together, planned everything carefully, and foresaw various contingencies.  One would hope that they all agreed on what the overall strategic objective was, and how to proceed afterwards, dependent upon the possibilities of what could happen.  One would hope.  One wonders if it was more likely that there were Pepe jokes, screams of “Hail Kek!” – and burnishing of shields and adjustment of capes and costumes.

I do not know whether Spencer, or anyone close to him, reads this blog.  I hope so; in any case, the following message sums up what he needs to know:

Richard, in my opinion – and, possibly, yours as well – your long term future in the “movement” lies in the area of politics, including and especially electoral politics, at a time, in the not-too-distant future, when the racial situation makes a growing fraction of White Americans more amenable to “this thing of ours.”  However, you are fast approaching the point where your continued association with the juvenile jackass faction of the Alt Right is going to compromise your future political viability, even if the racial situation sours and Whites become more “open” to “radicalism.”  Hailgate was nothing, a tempest in a teapot; Charlottegate is another thing entirely; three people are dead.  No, it’s not your fault, but you know as well as I do that in politics, perception, if not everything, is often more important than the actual truth.  There will come a point where continued incidents are going to close off potential future options for you.   

I urge you, I implore you, to seek out and consider guidance and input from older and more experienced activists.  If I am unacceptable due to ethnicity, pseudonymity, temperament, hostility to the Alt Right, or some other reason; if Johnson is unacceptable because of your feud, then find someone else.  Dickson can give legal advice, but you need more broad guidance.  Duke and Strom are too radical, a more prudent touch is required. Brimelow – who wistfully discusses with Jewish correspondents the possibility of you being shot – is too moderate, not in any way any sort of racial nationalist.  As much as I oppose the whole Alt Wrong, I’ll say then your best bet is Taylor, if you overlook his reaction to Hailgate.  You’re both in the general DC area; I’d suggest you get some serious input ASAP. That doesn’t mean you should accept the Amren ideology; I’m talking about grown-up strategic and tactical advice. I’d also suggest you heal the rift with Johnson, which is unproductive for all involved (and for all, I mean the entire “movement” – since your Alt Right brand’s pretense of “movement” hegemony has essentially equated the Alt Right with White nationalism in the public mind).  I would also move as quickly as possible on the attorney network and get serious input from folks on your (I guess “our”) side who have military/security/law enforcement experience. You are in a spot now that if you don’t hold more rallies, then that’s a sign of weakness and damaging to your progress, but more fiascos like yesterday will seriously affect your overall viability in the long term. And we do not yet know all the fallout – legal, social, political, internal-to-the-“movement” of all of this.  It is now a critical time and I would suggest that your next moves be planned carefully and strategically.

As to more general advice for “movement” events – the rally would have been better served with a smaller and more cohesive group.  This is another example of the Right rushing into things ill prepared.  Some things should have been in order first: a professional (and uniformed, see below) security force, the proposed attorney network, a cohesive plan of action, coupling these tactics to a long term strategy. It’s not a good idea to issue a general call for “anyone sort of Alt-Righty-in-sentiment to show up and do your thing” – the quantity doesn’t offset the loss of quality.  Yes, maybe the car was being swarmed and maybe it was self-defense: but you know, only one person drove their car into the crowd and created that whole PR mess; a more cohesive and disciplined group, with a plan, may well have avoided all of that.

I differ from the current mindset that says “we should not wear uniforms – dressing in scruffy street clothes, or like a Marvel superhero, or like some other kind of brain addled jackass is much better.”  No, uniforms are a net positive.  Uniforms serve a number of purposes.  First and most obviously, to distinguish friend from foe. But, then, also, and relevant here, uniforms provide a sense of solidarity, professionalism, group pride, discipline – in a phrase: esprit de corps.  To the charge that uniforms are “un-American,” “creepy,” or what have you – first, the military wear uniforms and if you style yourself a “political soldier” then it is not creepy, second, there were the Silver Shirts and other American groups that wore uniforms, third, dressing up like Captain America looks even worse to “normies” than a tasteful and professional uniform, and, fourth, you’ll be called a “Nazi White supremacist” whatever you wear, so you may as well go in style, and with professional discipline.  

Trump and Sessions cucked as expected.  If they had cracked down on Antifa months ago, like they should have, the violence they deplore would not have happened.  It’s partially on their heads, on their incompetence and cowardice.  Some of the Trump fanboys are breathing heavily that “his statement was vague and condemned all sides.”  Maybe so. Let’s see how things play out in the days to come.  As to the excuse, “what else can he do as President,” well, see above.  The ultimate reason I say that Trump and Sessions “cucked out” is their previous failure to denounce, and act against, extreme leftist violence, including violence against their own supporters.  It is their previous abject failure, their abdication of their federal law enforcement responsibility, which, combined with their “let’s all be united and reject hatred” rhetoric, that casts them in a small and cowardly light.  If they are stampeded by System pressure to make even more targeted anti-White comments, then that would just reinforce what the reality is about them. And Trump’s comments that “the economy is real good now, so what are all these protests about?” are so inane that it is difficult to believe this man has any sense whatsoever.  Is he really that delusional?

Hey, Ivanka, there’s no place in America for small-headed, ferret-faced, shiksa sluts and their anorexic Jew husbands and their mixed-race children. Israel has a “law of return” and the entire Kushner clan, yourself included, will be most welcome there.  

How long before Trump cucks even more?  What is going on here?  And to the Virginia Establishment: no, you liars, the only side who initiated the violence were the anti-White leftists.  If they didn’t attack the rally, none of this would have happened.  To blame “racists” and “White supremacists” (a term that should disqualify anyone who uses it to describe White nationalists) means that you are blaming the victim and assert that Whites do not have the right to publicly convene to defend their interests.  You’re despicable.

And when is the Right going to get over its fetish for the police and all the “heroes in blue?” When is it going to stop fantasizing (a small scale version of the Man on White Horse Syndrome) that “the police (or military or FBI) is really on our side” then to see the police attack lawful Rightist rally-goers, while ignoring, or siding with, Left terrorists?  If you are revolutionaries, then the forces of the System are against you; they are the enemy.  Of course, you should try and recruit as many of them as you can, but as a group beholden to the System they are against us, not for us.

Indeed, the System – the ENTIRE System – is against us, never forget this. Look at all the nice GOP conservatives denouncing “White supremacists” and eschewing “blood and soil” and completely ignoring the fact that the violence was started, as usual, by the Far Left.

Yes sir, the FBI can probe “White nationalist violence” but for some reason endless months of Antifa violence causes no investigation.  More proof that all these “anarchist” “rebels” are part and parcel of the System, tools of globalism and Big Business, running dogs of the Establishment, working hand-in-glove with politicians and law enforcement.

And we have certain past Presidents citing communist terrorist Mandela against all these nasty “racists.” Yes, indeed, cite and praise a terrorist, side with Antifa terrorism, and oppose people legally exercising their constitutional rights of free assembly.  Who?  Who? Indeed.

Here are excerpts (emphasis added) from an excellent VDARE article on the System reaction to this fiasco:

The mask is off.

There can be no further delusions nor any more comforting lies. “America” and the supposed “freedoms” guaranteed by its Constitution are as relevant today as the Holy Roman Empire’s claims to sovereignty or the head of the House of Stuart boasting about being King of England.

In Charlottesville, Virginia, the police department openly attacked a demonstration in defense of European-American heritage. They did these despite the Unite The Right rally having secured a permit (after legal action) and having every right to host its peaceful demonstration in defense of the Robert E. Lee statue.

“Antifa,” the openly communist, anti-white and violent thugs who exist solely to attack European-Americans, were out in force in the city, using the cowardly tactics they specialize in: spraying demonstrators with mace, throwing bottles and bricks, and attacking people with weapons (including a homemade flamethrower).

It is quite true, as VDARE.com reported, that the police did not protect demonstrators from Antifa and did little to prevent confrontations. Attendees of the demonstration, rather than walking a clear path to the park, were instead forced to walk through a line of screaming protesters. Liberal clergyman and elderly women held signs about “peace” and “love” and smiled benevolently—as violent Leftist protesters attacked from the crowd. They are as culpable as the Antifa themselves for the violence unleashed.

But that was not close to the worst. Demonstrators did not need protection from Antifa. All the police would have had to do to ensure a safe demonstration was simply go home—which is what happened in Berkeley. Patriots equipped with shields, inured to Antifa tactics of throwing bricks and spraying mace, had secured Lee Park (excuse me, “Emancipation Park”) and may indeed have outnumbered both Antifa and counter-demonstrators in terms of pure numbers. Several were armed, and the city fathers should be offering Unite The Right activists tearful tributes for the latter’s saint-like restraint in not opening fire despite more than justified provocation.

If police had done nothing, the public would have been safer. Instead, unforgivably, the police attacked (not dispersed—attacked) the legal demonstration, threatening attendees with arrest if they stayed in Lee Park.

Then activists, totally unprotected by police, were deliberately funneled into a gauntlet of attacking Communists, in a kind of Kill Zone. Injuries on both sides were predictable. (Of course, much like cuckservatives who bow and scrape to the Main Stream Media, the police were then insulted by the Communists for their trouble.

This could have been a relatively stable situation: a patriot demonstration protected by its own shield wall (and ideally, by police who actually did their job) along with a separate group of Leftist protesters, with both groups enjoying the right to free speech supposedly guaranteed them by the Constitution.

Instead, the police precipitated a running battle which engulfed all of Charlottesville. The result: Antifa running wild and chasing down isolated pockets of Unite The Right attendees as the latter defended themselves as best they could, with bystanders were caught in the melee. Police showed no interest in doing anything other than threatening patriots with arrests for “unlawful assembly.”

In contrast, of course, Leftists were free to disobey the laws and marched merrily down the streets, many chanting “Black Lives Matter!”, causing chaos as they went. As Rebel Media’s Faith Goldy reported, this was an absurd “double standard.” Anarcho-Tyranny was the order of the day in C-Ville.

The casualties are piling up as I write this on Saturday evening [Charlottesville Rally Turns Deadly; One Killed After Car Strikes Crowd, by Phil McCausland, Emmanuelle Saliba, and Moira Donohue, NBC News, August 12, 2017]. A car plowed into a crowd of Leftist protesters, though it is unknown whether this was deliberate or politically motivated.  But note that the only reason this was even possible is that law enforcement thought it was a good idea to turn over the streets to anarchists.

Adding to the chaos, there is also a report of a National Guard helicopter crashing nearby and two fatalities have been reported [Helicopter crash in Albemarle County, CBS 19, August 12, 2017].

All of this occurred after a “state of emergency” had been declared and demonstrations were supposed to have been halted.

It’s obvious to anyone on the ground, or anyone who has been paying attention to any of this over the last few years, that Antifa are responsible for the entirety of the violence. Leftists, no matter how extreme, do not have to fear Right Wing violence at their events, nor do they have to fear the police ignoring attacks against them.

Violence did not just “break out” at Unite The Right. Attendees were attacked—by Leftists and by the police. They worked together as seamlessly as if they had common leadership.

Despite this, or perhaps because of it, the System’s most shameless courtiers, Main Stream Media journalists, are trying to blame Unite The Right participants.

As Antifa openly slash tires, attack activists (and random bystanders) and parade under symbols of Communist mass murder, it is not as though journalists do not see what is happening. No one can pretend it is pro-white demonstrators who are being violent or destroying property, not even reporters. However, like the city government, the journalists are determined to disguise this reality.

But what’s most disappointing, though not surprising, is how Establishment Conservatives are going along with this—including Donald Trump.

Advertisements

Race and Movement News: Early August 2017

Odds and ends.

I’m not sure the conference “shrugged off” anything given that an attendee was assaulted and then, on top of it, got into legal trouble, but what they hey, right?

And Spencer is a big boy and all, and can do as he pleases, but I note he has completely ignored the advice of this blog to eschew the Alt Wrong, and instead speaks at a conference organized by those who threw him under the bus for Jewish interests, with fellow speakers including someone who engaged in bemused schadenfreude with a Jewish correspondent over the possibility of Spencer getting shot.  I’m not very confident about the judgment of Alt Right leadership, but these guys are young; maybe they’ll mature with age.

This analysis was disappointing.  Panhandling Brimelow and scum like Derbyshire are enjoyable?  Derbyshire talks science?

One could of course take a “glass half full” approach and say that having more radical folk like Spencer and Friberg speak was maturation on the part of the Alt Wrong itself; but any conference that features the likes of Derbyshire as a speaker is inherently flawed at its deepest foundations.

One could also argue that both sides overcame personal issues to let Spencer (and Friberg) have a forum to promote the Alt Right (whether that’s a good thing is another question), and so all involved should be commended for putting “the good of the movement” above all else. Perhaps.  But there are, as implied above, deeper issues at stake other than the merely personal. Loyalty and dependability, essential in a crisis – can people who so blithely “threw you under the bus” for something so inconsequential has “Hailgate” be trusted in the event of more serious occurrences?  And how can the deep ideological divide be plastered over? What should hardcore WN supporters of the Alt right think about this dalliance with the Alt Wrong?  Conversely, what will Jewish supporters of the Alt Wrong think about Spencer-Friberg speaking at Amren?  In the end, do the Alt Right and Alt Wrong brands actually represent anything meaningful?  Anything consistent?  Anything that can be depended upon beyond the needs of the moment?

No surprise that Der Movement, including the ‘anti-immigration” alt Wrong sites, hasn’t had anything to say about this.

Question: will the good and great “alpha male” Trump, with his “unlimited pardoning power” do the right thing and pardon Arpaio? Or are we just getting to get more tweets attacking Sessions instead?

But, but, but…I thought we were all the same, race is only skin deep:

Current meta-analytical research suggests that different population groups have distinctive muscular adaptations…

An ethnonationalist response to EGI paradigm: “all our enemies are White, so we don’t care about racial solidarity.”

Putting aside the “who cares that we’ve all been ruined by two world wars, let’s indulge in more of the narrow, ethnonationalist retarded nonsense that caused our problems to begin with,” EGI can apply to the ethnic group as well as to the race, so what’s the point to the response?  I mean, other than the obvious point that ethnonationalism, in the narrow sense exemplified by the above quote, is a curse on our race and must be unalterably opposed and, eventually, crushed into the dust.

Amren Conference: Wishful Thinking?

A useful outcome.
 
The Amren conference (taking place right now) itself – an Alt Wrong fantasia well represented by the likes of Derbyshire and Brimelow – is nothing of great importance.
 
But would it be too much to hope for that Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer use the opportunity of their co-attendance at the meeting to amicably settle their differences? Perhaps Johnson and Dickson could as well, but the Johnson-Spencer schism is one of the largest ones in Der Movement today and is of greater importance.
 
Imagine the consternation of the Left if such a rapprochement took place.

A Mendacious Middle Easterner

Another Hart attack.

Read this nonsense.

By this I am not suggesting that Jews are naturally unpatriotic because they are not Christians. The theological differences between religious Jews and religious Christians are minor compared with the differences between believers and non-believers, and orthodox Jews tend to be politically conservative. There are also many who are not religious but who still love and honor the United States, but this is not necessarily true of many atheists and agnostics.

 
Wow! A Jew states that he doesn’t believe that Jews are “naturally unpatriotic!”  Who would have ever guessed?  I mean, why let several thousand years of anti-nationalist, anti-patriotic, anti-majoritarian, and otherwise subversive Jewish behavior, in every land they have ever dwelt (nay, festered) in, including the United States of America, convince you otherwise?  Why let the Jews’ advocacy of anti-White and anti-American causes, their leadership of the “Civil Rights Movement” which ruined America, their leadership in overturning our demographics through the 1965 immigration act and through migrant cheerleading, their constant hostility to any manifestation of White identity whatsoever, their Israel-first identity and foreign policy preferences – why let any of that make you think otherwise?
 
Then he makes a moronic comment about “theological differences” as if that matters, or should we say maybe it does matter since both Jews and many “religious Christians” are in favor of open borders and the demographic eclipse of Europeans worldwide.  
 
Next we are told that “orthodox Jews tend to be politically conservative.”
 
OK.  First, most Jews are not orthodox.  Second, the wonderfully conservative orthodox Jews supported Clinton over Trump by a comfortable margin, albeit a bit less than their less religions co-ethnics. Third, even “conservative orthodox Jews” will in general hardly be reliable allies for any sort of Far Right White identity movement.  Fourth, those “conservative orthodox Jews” sure don’t have a problem exploiting America’s social welfare system, even to the point of being accused of welfare fraud.
 
Then Hart completes his outrageous screed by stating that “many” – we have to presume he is still talking about Jews here – who are not religious (Hart?) “still love and honor the United States” – but the real problem, you see, are all those “atheists and agnostics.”
 
So, according to the fantasy world of Hart, Jews – including secular Jews – are well-known for their upstanding patriotism and love for America, orthodox Jews are rock-solid conservatives wearing MAGA yarmulkes, while the real problem are all those (goyisch) “atheists and agnostics.”
 
What a despicable mendacious blot on humanity is this Hart.  But what about those who give him a forum?
 
Note to Richard Spencer: I agree with all you now say about the Alt Lite (and I was indeed saying it months before you), but what about really taking out the heavy memetic artillery and tackling the Alt Wrong?  You know, the guys who threw you under the bus because Hailgate offended all those HuWhite Jews of the West, and the guys who sniggered with their Jewish correspondents about the possibility of you getting shot.
 
They are the real problem on the Right, not the Alt Lite milksops.

Rotten Orange and VDARE News

Two items.

Australian leader mocks refugee-welcoming weakling cuck Trump.

Well, why not?  He probably out-handshaked him as well.  No worries though!  A few more Trump tweets about “Celebrity Apprentice” ratings and it’ll all be A-OK.

Speaking of VDARE, how about the spectacle of Happy Penguin Brimelow using the GOP baseball practice shooting as a fundraising vehicle?  I’ll let the reader make their own judgment on his character based on that – and his more typical habit of using his family, particularly his young children, as panhandling props (never mind his “cheesecake” pictures accompanying posts and his continued tolerance of a writer who publicly questioned at VDARE why possession of child porn should be illegal).

The good news: VDARE.com’s Summer Fundraising drive is now within $25,000 of its $80,000 total.
The good and bad news: Every single day brings more confirmation of the vital importance of VDARE.com’s role—unfortunately, often tragic.
After Inauguration Day, January 20 2017, I wrote of the Left’s violent temper tantrum in the streets of the nation’s capital: We’re facing what was called in the case of the Civil War an irrepressible conflict. But this is America. People have guns. It will come to blood.
Now, on June 14, 2017, what appears to be a lone Leftist gunman has indeed shed blood—of House Majority Steve Scalise and at least four other victims at a Congressional Republican baseball practice.
There will be more.

Putting Our Feed Down Indeed

More madness.

I don’t “have a dog in this fight.”  I really don’t know anything about Friberg, but I used to have a productive interaction with Johnson and Counter-Currents and I’ve repeatedly stated I think Spencer has great potential as a White nationalist leader.  No doubt both are displeased with my criticisms of the “movement,” particularly the Alt Right, but I say (or write) what’s on my mind.

Putting all that aside, this latest “movement” feud is pathetic and all-too-typical.  It’s the usual “he said, she said” type of back-and-forth sniping, contradictory statements, gossip, and feuding based on personality and squabbling over limited resources rather than principled disagreements over ideology.  It’d embarrassing, it makes the Left laugh at us, it’s airing “dirty laundry” for all to see, and it exemplifies all the reasons I have zero confidence in the way things are run in the “movement.”  

Who is right?  Who is wrong?  Who knows? Who cares?  The “movement” madness train rolls on, without end. All these guys make comments about my “insanity” and “bitterness” or whatever – that’s on my part mostly tongue-in-cheek ridicule of Nutzi stupidity.  On the other hand, this long-running Johnson-Spencer feud is not tongue-in-cheek, it’s all too real.

It reminds me of the types of infighting in business – “office politics” – or in academia – “departmental politics.”  When resources are limited, this nonsense starts.

What are the resources in play here?  One is leadership and status.  Well, it would be better to at least struggle for leadership based on some concrete ideological differences, rather than personality and ambition.  Yes, yes – there’s that Big Europe vs. Ethnonationalism bit, but I wonder (as do some commentators) how much of that is a cause of the clash and how much of it is actually an effect.  Leadership?  Leadership of what exactly?  And, guys, if you really want to exhibit real leadership, you’d settle your differences and present a more united front against the anti-White forces.

Then there’s money.  Well, how about focusing your ire at the Alt Wrong instead of at each other?  From what I’ve read, the “happy penguins” of VDARE and, also, Amren take the lion’s share of “movement” funding.  And each of you have legitimate beefs with the Alt Wrong (besides just ideological differences).  Spencer should remember that it wasn’t just Greg who critiqued him over “Hailgate” – Brimelow and Taylor couldn’t “throw him under the bus” fast enough.  And let’s not forget Brimelow musing out loud at VDARE about his cheering up a Jewish correspondent with the idea that Spencer is likely to “get shot.” Johnson should remember his comments about how disgusting it is that Derbyshire is getting support from “movement” sources – that’s the Alt Wrong that’s propping up Derbyshire, at the expense (literally) of actual pro-White activists.

Problem is that the Man on White Horse Syndrome affects the “movement” internally as well as externally, so we have “rock stars” and “dignified elders” that we are supposed to not criticize.  Well, that’s another “movement” dogma I reject.

Anyway, this whole thing is pathetic.

Get over yourselves, guys.  Please.

And for another self-satisfied navel-gazer, enter Jack Donovan.

“Wolves Nationalist,” Right.  Is that gray wolf, red wolf, or werewolf?  And then we see the usual fossilized “movement” dogma/ethnic fetishism in the comments section.

And then you wonder why I can’t take any of these fellows seriously?

Der Movement, 5/10/17

“Movement” activists: you’re being hoodwinked.

Pete Penguin:

Peter is considering seasonal haircut depending on finances.

Translation: The happy penguins of VDARE need a few more million dollars of donations and then maybe Pete will trim the mop.

Roissy:

PS Anyone remember that Syrian air strike? Yeah, that’s what I thought. Big to-do about nothing. Go choke on your black pills, Trump turncoats.

Anyone remember deporting the “dreamers?”  Anyone remember protectionist economics? Anyone remember a pro-Russian and anti-Chinese foreign policy?  Anyone remember that Trump and Sessions could end Antifa antics in America tomorrow if they wanted to? Anyone remember “draining the swamp” as opposed to CEOcracy and corrupt “Skypes” selling American residency to wealthy Chinamen? Yeah, that’s what I thought…choke on your white pills, homoerotic Trump fanboys.