In der news.
This may be the best speech Taylor has ever given (albeit it was not given directly to his intended audience). I urge readers of this blog to spread it around. Taylor has all the makings of a born politician (and I’m praising here, not being sarcastic) and should have run for office – or do so in the future. Despite my areas of disagreement with Amren, I would support such a candidacy.
By the way, if Amren concentrated more on things like this, my areas of disagreement would be minimal. This is what we need more of, not Asian-worshipping HBD, cheap-shot attacks against White ethnics, and giving a forum to vermin like Hart.
Yes, indeed, let’s have a “hearing” on “White nationalism” in which no White nationalists are invited and, indeed, no persons of European ancestry are even invited to speak. And we observe a Black woman representing the Right. I mean – can the clownshow of America get any more ludicrous? And it’s another fail for Der Movement, whose decades of utter failure have led us to this junction of powerlessness, despair, and complete defeat. Speaking of which…
Pathetic Greg Johnson response to Common Sense Counselor:
2 hours ago
One of my readers asked me to reply to this. Basically, I heard someone thinking out loud about my talk and wending his way to the conclusion that no, we should not focus on education as opposed to violence. Instead, he stands for something completely different, namely educating people about just how bad things are for white people — while warning them not to do anything violent. I guess because he is assuming that, no matter how bad things are, we have time to sort them out without violence. Sorry, but I don’t see any fundamental difference between what he said and what I said. I was just a lot clearer. My strong impression is that this guy only half listened to my talk and concluded that I said some very bad things because he has an ax to grind against me. Oh well, I guess I just need to work a little harder.
Wrong (as usual) and self-serving (as usual). I see a huge fundamental difference. CSC is suggesting we be ice-cold honest about the desperate situation we are in, not assert that “yes, things seem a bit bad now, but we are going to win,” always the victory psychosis, always a refusal to face up to “movement” disasters (except when one can blame Spencer and/or Friberg), and always with the tin cup out for panhandling without any actual victories or accomplishments to show for it. CSC is also very clearly calling for action that goes beyond education but falls short of violence – whether I agree with his suggestions or not is a discussion for another day (e.g., rallies and so forth – but boycotts I do agree with), but clearly he’s calling for things apart from folks just posting web articles and selling books and begging for money. I think some folks need to “work a little harder” on their auditory comprehension skills.
It is too bad that CSC answered Johnson in the comments section in a groveling fashion, instead of doing the proper thing, which would be to answer him, directly, in writing, with the same critical force as was used in the original video. He “doesn’t have an axe to grind” – after essentially stating that Johnson was not fit to be a WN leader. He also implied that WN “leaders” (like Johnson) sugarcoat reality for their “business model” (rattling the tin cup and selling books). Which is it? Is this CSC just too polite? Does he lack the inner conviction of his beliefs so as to effectively respond when directly challenged by those “leaders” he criticizes?
And, CSC should do a video about the psychological defects and deficiencies behind the repeated Man on White Horse Syndrome humiliations, most recently represented by the Yang Gang fiasco.
I would like to correct any misunderstandings about this post. Without seeing the paper, we cannot say anything about admixture. The paper may very well show admixture in the samples; at this point, we do not know. My point simply is that the fact of changing centroids in and of itself says nothing about admixture. The change could be from admixture, or it could be simply from addition of samples from different ethnies. You can get gray by mixing white and black paint, or you can get gray be averaging out the colors of separate and distinct cans of white and black paint. Changing centroids due to admixture would have to be demonstrated by showing that individual samples are admixed, simply averaging the genetics of different unmixed samples is not admixture. Again, at this point, we do not know which of these two possibilities (or a perhaps a bit of both possibilities combined) is correct. We cannot assume one possibility or the other bases solely on the changing centroids alone. We not only have to wait for this particular paper, but also to see whether other research groups examine the same samples or, other, similar samples,and generate similar, or different, results..
I will also note that I have always been agnostic about what the racial provenance of ancient peoples was. I have maintained that the only way to really know is to directly assay ancient remains for their autosomal genetics (and hope those samples are representative of the relevant peoples), and this has heretofore not been done. True, I have always been skeptical about the “movement” narrative, for reasons I have written about over the years, but this has always been a cautious, prudent skepticism, and not any definitive belief. I have always thought that the “evidence” used in the debates has been absurd – “eyeballing” statues, tendentious readings of ancient texts, the work of Frank, etc. .Further, my view was and still is that we need to concentrate on the racial situation today, and in the future, not thousands of years in the past. It was people like Kemp and Pierce and their supporters who were the ones who started the whole acrimonious argument to begin with
An appetizer for the upcoming Roman study:
Results suggest that only 7% of individuals buried at Vagnari were born elsewhere and migrated to Vagnari, while the remaining individuals were either local to Vagnari (58%), or from the southern Italian peninsula (34%). Our results are consistent with the suggestion that Roman Imperial lower‐class populations in southern Italy sustained their numbers through local reproduction measures, and not through large‐scale immigration from outside the Italian peninsula.
Want to read something that shows you where feminist man-hating is heading? Read Jack Vance’s City of the Chasch in Planet of Adventure, in particular the section on “The Seminary of the Female Mystery.” Vance being prescient once again – better than the idiot Tolkien and his juvenile fantasies about “orcs.” By the way, the good guys win in the Vance story, as the men revolt and destroy the Seminary and kill the Priestesses. Unfortunately, the catalyst for that was a bit of White Knighting, but you can’t have everything.
Trump recently fired Scandicuck DHS secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, because the border had become a slip n’ slide for hundreds of thousands of Central Americans under her watch. Even the enemy media noticed and had to act as if they didn’t report just a few weeks ago that there wasn’t a national emergency at the border.
Trump also did a 180 on legal immigration, recently stating that America “was full” and didn’t need more immigrants, contradicting the enthusiasm for legal immigration he displayed in his SOTU address.
Word has it Stephen Miller (PBU that most righteous and based of specials) is taking over all immigration related policy matters in Trump’s administration.
What gives? Is this more hot air from Trump? Did he get a fright from internal polling? Is he an amnesiac? Is he too lazy to remember his policy proposals from one week to the next and just wants to ride a wave of feelz on whatever banal thought enters his mind? Did Ivanka go on vacation? Did Jared? Did the maturing Barron give his dad a suddenly judgmental gaze and a warning about his legacy? Did Melania finally stop crying over separated beanlets and show Donald the sharp edge of her Outer Hajnal soul?
Did Trump catch an earful from…us? Does vanity preclude me from wondering if dissidents to the prevailing orthodoxy, threatening to abandon Trump for his MAGA betrayals, pulled President Trump back to the essence of Campaign Trump?
No, Roissy, no. It’s like this – Trump is a lazy, stupid, imbecilic, vulgar buffoon, who, literally, believes and promotes whatever was the latest idea whispered in his ear. Before the State of the Union, Jew Kushner and converted Jew Ivanka were doing the whispering, more recently, Jew Miller has been whispering. Obviously, one has to be either an ethnic Jew, or a converted Jew family member, to be allowed near Trump’s hairy orange ear. Weasel-faced goys like you (or mick Bannon) are not allowed.
And as regard the moronic HBD Cunt Hajnal crap turds like you continue to peddle, you can only hope that you had an “Outer Hajnal” ethnocentric White as US President, instead of the retarded bloated fat cuck shitheel currently occupying the White House.
Let’s not be too hard on the Swedes. They wuz Romans, after all. No, wait…