Category: Chechar

Sallis, Strom, and Racial Purity

Depends who writes it, I guess.

Remember this essay?  Remember the criticism the basic points received from the Nutzi peanut gallery?

Read this from Strom, emphasis added:

We have common ancestry with every living creature on this planet, if you go back far enough. So the old racialist idea of “purity” — meaning an unbroken, nearly identical lineage going “back to Adam” — was wrong from the start. Purity is the wrong word; those who used it were unaware of the ever-evolving nature of life. They were ignorant of evolution, which is a branching process; they didn’t know that all the races, varieties, subspecies, and species that ever lived are branches on one metaphorical tree — and that, going backwards in time, all the branches eventually converge into one at the root.

Question: Is the crazed mestizo “Chechar” going to accuse Strom of “sophistry?”  Does Strom – long associated with radical Nordicists like Pierce – have a “Medicist” agenda?  Or is he just talking hard science and plain common sense?

So: If Sallis writes it, then it’s bad.  If Strom writes it, it’s acceptable.  The exact same point, expressed by two different people, received in completely different ways.  Does that tell you anything?  

Then, this:

As the writer David Sims tells us, “Morally speaking, a flaw is anything that works contrary to survival. In any proper moral system, survival has the highest value. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value at all to extinct groups. Because only to something alive may anything else be good. If a moral system gives to anything but survival the highest place of value, sooner or later a conflict will arise between survival and whatever that other thing is.

Agreed, and that’s a point I was making long ago at Majority Rights, arguing against both the cognitive elitism of GNXP, and the aracial conservatism of John Ray.  We care about various ideas, in the last analysis, based upon how they affect us as people, as evolved organisms, and an idea does not benefit a group if that idea contributes to that group’s demise, or even if it doesn’t positively contribute to that group’s survival.

Regurgitating obviously wrong ideas about an absolute racial purity, which is easily discredited by the Left, does not serve the cause of survival.  A forward-looking emphasis on EGI and evolution (concepts that are not incompatible, by the way, regardless of “movement” lies that EGI favors “genetic stasis”) does enhance group survival – such arguments are proofed against an honest scientific critique.

Der Movement: July Edition

SLC news.

Here’s your periodic reminder: “America’s Senator” Jeff Sessions not only defends Antifa, but also does their legal work for them as Attorney General. He’s worse than the Cuban and the Mormon.

Yeah Jeff, laugh over those “lock her up” chants.  Trouble is, when the audience is thinking of Hillary Clinton as “her,” Antifa Jeff is probably thinking of some Alt Lite bimbo. Or maybe Mudshark Annie herself.

An anti-pan-European Counter-Currents ethnonationalist comments on some stupidity from anti-White mestizo Vox Day.

First, why do Whites listen to the likes of Vox Day or Chechar?  Latinos, White-Amerind mixes, and the like should mind their own racial business and let Whites sort out their relationships among themselves.  As far as Counter-Currents, well, the dastardly Richard Spencer must be opposed, so let’s “diss” pan-Europeanism, while at the same time promoting the Cult of Saint Francis of Yockey, the patron saint of Western Empire.  It’s all a clown show.  How can all the Type Is take any of these idiots seriously?  Then again, if they had the sense to realize the inconsistencies, they wouldn’t be Type Is to begin with.

All these people are fundamentally dishonest.  On the one hand, you have self-described racially-mixed civic nationalists (hint to Counter-Currents morons: civic nationalism is not an acceptable substitute for racial nationalism, it is its enemy, in the same way para-fascism and real fascism are deadly enemies, and how the Mainstream Right is opposed to the Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right) essentially assert that the state of White America in 2018 is the same as in 1918, or perhaps 1863 with natives fighting Dead Rabbits. The ethnonationalists knock down pathetic strawman representations of pan-Europeanism as wanting to erase European ethnic and national identities, when even Saint Francis repeatedly asserted that even he – the Avatar of Western Empire – supported the preservation of local identities, complete with local sovereignty. All they do is lie,lie,lie, and I have refuted these people so many times it has become boring.

Remember – keep on listening to HBD musclemen and race-mixing gamesters and eat that high fat diet!

High-fat diet (HFD) mimicked the human condition of obesity and insulin resistance, including symptoms such as elevated serum glucose and insulin levels and reduced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake into muscle and adipose tissue. Interestingly, HFD also decreased (-44%) glucose uptake into bone marrow. Bone mass was reduced (-45%) by HFD due to a diminished (-45%) bone remodeling rate. Bone matrix quality aspects, such as biomechanical stability, were additionally decreased…This data shows that exercise prevents some, but not all of the negative effects of HFD on bone health…

If they’re wrong about almost everything else, why not about diet and exercise as well?

There are also associations between a high fat diet and cancer risk.  Build dem muscles!  I don’t know… maybe you can slip in some steroids along with the chemotherapy?

Der Movement in the News, 5/9/16

Two items.

A. The Occidental Observer has not only jumped the shark, the shark has jumped itself. TOO now features the scribbling of demented mestizo Nordicist Chechar, the poster boy for “movement” insanity.  TOO – stick a fork in it, it’s done  That’s where following HBD gets you.

B. A two step action plan for commentators like Ulf, Walter, and Leon here.

Step 1: Read Poe’s short story The Purloined Letter, and ponder the major point Poe makes in that work.

Step 2: Listen to the podcast again.

Good luck with that.

The "Movement" and Following Through on Premises

The biological determinism premise.
The “movement” – particularly its HBD faction – promotes the idea that behavior is biologically determined. Certainly, culture and environment count for little according to this meme.  I am more in agreement than disagreement with this viewpoint: biology is predominant, but perhaps not exclusive.
But, if biology trumps culture according to “movement” memes, then this woman’s destructive ethics can’t be laid at the feet of her Jewish conversion.
Never fear though.  The “movement” is never at a loss. Obviously, this behavior is good – disinterested moral universalism from a hunter-gatherer origin! – simply exploited and perverted by nefarious others. This woman – who can reasonably be seen as prompting the “peaceful” world-wide genocide of Europeans – is merely a victim.  Indeed, a certain Liberal Latino will argue that the hardware is great, it is only a software problem.  The “movement” has answers for everything.
Unfortunately, reality moves inexorably forward, disregarding “movement” dogma.