, I’m not inclined to make lengthy or frequent responses to Chechar because he mainly craves attention and doesn’t really offer any new or useful ideas. His belief that Whites suck is already the dominant belief amongst Whites, and it’s doing Whites great harm.
Chechar’s just-so argument is not simply wrong, it’s wrong in an ironic and telling way. Chechar misinterprets and downplays the influence of jews on both Christianity and Spain, and jewish crypsis more generally.
If a significant number of Whites are prone to be like Chechar, then does it not make a tentative case for White Pathology?
Chechar’s narrative on crypto-jews follows the first paragraph, the “litany of suffering” portion of the jewish narrative above. But note that even the jews don’t pretend that jews were completely eliminated/neutralized, as Chechar does.
Chechar, the Spanish imposter,
Boring blog, no ideas to foster.
He’s descended from Moops
and still jumps through hoops
to forget being bullied by Auster.
He’s shifted the middle portions of his argument, but his premise and conclusion, that Whites suck (or to be more precise, Whites are fundamentally broken, in that we have some inherent jew-independent drive to self-destruct), remains the same.
He’s no longer focused on how I suck, but broadens it to how White nationalists suck:
Yes, I’ve noted that as well, his consistency in diverting a directed criticism of what he has said by saying what he said was “hyperbole”.That statement completely undercuts whatever point he was making, since the “hyperbole” was his core point.
What he does next is ask you to read a book that is 1,000 pages long, or redirect you to 10 of his past essays plus the entire output of Counter-Currents for the last two years.* Until such a time as you do so, he no longer permits you to engage him in debate.
What Chechar sees is what he went searching for in the first place, a way to blame Whites and excuse jews.
My point is that Chechar is the one making ridiculous arguments and all-or-nothing claims. He acknowledges jewish infiltration and subversion only to dismiss it.
I think the best explanation for his behavior is that he’s either a crypto-jew, neurotic, or both. I think his bombast about Hitler and exterminating jews is squid ink. Whatever the cause for Chechar’s crusade, the bigger picture, I think, is that as the parasite is exposed and its cries of “ANTI-PARASITISM!!!” lose potency, the host’s antibodies can expect tacts like “IT’S ALL THE HOST’S FAULT!!!” to come to the fore. My larger point is, why does he do this? Why is he looking for a way to blame Whites and excuse jews? I have asked him directly. He ignores the question. In fact, when he made public , he deliberately left out that portion, the better to paint me as “paranoid”…
…Of late, Chechar has been posting more and more on the necessity to exterminate large amounts of White people in order to preserve White people (well, specifically English Roses). It may seem counter intuitive to you or I but it makes great sense to Chechar.
The breeding of pure whites in Latin America was thus both scanty and slow.
On the other hand, the breeding of mixed-bloods began at once and attained notable proportions. Having slaughtered the Indian males or briganded them in slave-gangs, the Conquistadors took the Indian women to themselves. The humblest man-at-arms had several female attendants, while the leaders became veritable pashas with great harems of concubines. The result was a prodigious output of half-breed children, known as “mestizos” or “cholos.”
And soon a new ethnic complication was added. The Indians having developed a melancholy trick of dying off under slavery, the Spaniards imported African negroes to fill the servile ranks, and since they took negresses as well as Indian women for concubines, other half-breeds mulattoes appeared. Here and there Indians and negroes mated on their own account, the offspring being known as “zambos.” In time these various hybrids bred among themselves, producing the most extraordinary ethnic combinations.
As Garcia-Calderon well puts it: “Grotesque generations with every shade of complexion and every conformation of skull were born in America a crucible continually agitated by unheard-of fusions of races. . . . But there was little Latin blood to be found in the homes formed by the sensuality of the first conquerors of a desolated America.”
And since Sir Cholo loves Pierce, the following is of interest (emphasis added):
Underneath this Mexican nationalism is genuine racial hatred and racial resentment. The mestizo compensates for his deeply felt racial inferiority…
Indeed. There’s a lot of truth there. Resentment against Old World Europeans, the Iberians for example: “Why did you have to miscegenate in the New World and produce the likes of me?” There’s one step from that to asserting that those no-good forebears were themselves already mongrels – “I hate you and you are no better than me.” Resentment and deeply felt racial inferiority.