Category: cherrypicking

Ted Sallis Counter-Currents Article Mentioned in Mainstream Asiatic "Academic" Book

Asians contemplate themselves; hilarity ensues.

Problematically, as Ted Sallis notes, within the expansive “Marvel universe” Asian and Asian …

It then goes on about this section of my essay:


On the other hand, Marvel’s East Asian characters had a more troubled history, originally going through the buck-toothed, claw-handed, yellow peril phase, before a more modern interpretation in recent decades. This in a sense parallels Marvel’s take on the Vietnam war and politics in general. In the early-mid 1960s, particularly in Iron Man and Fantastic Four, Lee and Kirby promoted staunch American constitutional patriotism, anti-communism, and support for the Vietnam War. At this time, Oriental racial stereotypes were more common.
Later, younger writers came along with more liberal ideas on war and politics, and East Asian portrayals were adjusted accordingly (although the Mandarin and Yellow Claw continued as buck-toothed villains for a while).

Ah yes, Marvel’s depictions of the Mandarin and the Yellow Claw are very deeply offensive to me, a person who is the strongest possible proponent of the great East Asian race, our wonderful colored brothers and sisters whose vaunted IQs shine forth like the purest of gold brick bars.
Talk about cherry picking from your sources! 
That’s even more hilarious I think than retarded academics writing in journal articles critiquing some writings on race that were at the old Legion Europa site. 
These academics cannot find anything about the “far-Right” too petty to comment on and analyze. Indeed, if an Alt-Right leader were to pass gas, there’d be some academic around with a gas chromatography mass spectrometer to determine if there was any Zyklon B mixed in with the methane.
Don’t these “people” have anything better to do? Apparently not. Imagine, there are students actually paying tuition to attend classes taught by these folks. Perhaps that is the most hilarious joke of all.

Movement Cherrypicking: Plagiarism and Gay-Baiting

Selective, very, very selective.
Well, so one of the complaints about the execrable South Asian NEC D’Souza is plagiarism, a charge more mainstream sources have also leveled against the even more execrable South Asian NEC Zakaria.  Very good.  But then the plagiarism of Andrew Hamilton is ignored, and his boringly repetitive essays praised by movement comment thread peanut galleries. If plagiarism is wrong, it’s wrong no matter who does it, no?
This sort of “movement” cherrypicking extends to the favorite past-time of “gay-baiting” various “movement” personages. That is 100% politically motivated (here I refer to internal “movement” politics. not real Yockeyian High Politics). After all, there are some august “movement” personages widely rumored to be gay (no names, I don’t engage in this sort of womanly gossip-mongering), but who are NEVER the target of the sort of vulgar gay-baiting that takes places on “movement” blogs and comment threads. The reason? Well, gay-baiting in the “movement” is typically done by “activists” belonging to specific “precincts” within the “movement” and they share with those august personages a similar set of beliefs. On the other hands, the targets of the baiting are memetic opponents within the “movement” to those doing the baiting, so the accusations and insinuations come out specifically in those cases  (the “movement” being so obviously successful that it can afford to be ridden with this sort of sordid public squabbling).  It’s clear that there is no principled opposition to homosexuality as such, because a distinction is made between “our guys” (let’s not mention the rumors) and “their guys” (mention the rumors at every opportunity). That says more about the character of the baiters than it does the baitees; even more so, it says much about the character of the pathetic cesspool known as the “American racialist movement.”