Category: child porn

Silk Road News: Derb Finds Love

The usual perfidy and stupidity of Asians and those who love them.

Whatever else his (many) faults, Sailer deserves credit for his chronicling of anti-White Asian racial whining.

Colored is as colored does.

Yellow fever race-mixer Derbyshire, he of an unusual marriage, sees no problem in the unusual marriages of others.

My view, heartfelt and frequently stated, is that love is a precious gift, to be cherished and celebrated wherever it may be found.

Well, after all, Derbyshire has publicly questioned why possession of child porn should be illegal, so, yes, it would seem he really believes the part of “wherever it may be found.”

A long time ago, I heard a White woman claim that Yellow Fever is sublimated pedophilia, and there is probably some truth to that, considering the socially awkward White males interested in Yellows and the neotonic character of the Yellows themselves.

Quite the Mendacious Happy Penguin

Failed spin.

Despicable “happy penguin” Brimelow, disturbed at the blowback to his pathetic comments about Spencer, tries to spin it thus:

I got a certain amount of weird harrumphing over my blog congratulating Richard Spencer for his Auburn triumph, because I noted the danger that he will eventually be shot. Incredibly, some readers apparently thought I was advocating his being shot, or somehow making it more likely..

OK, Pete.  In your original post, you note an email correspondence with an anti-Spencer Jew, in which you say this about Spencer:

If it’s any consolation to you, I think it’s just a matter of time until he gets shot.

I don’t know, Petey my boy.  If you blithely talk about someone getting shot being “consolation” to a correspondent, it doesn’t seem like you’d be real upset and all about the possibility.  I mean, Pete, you are a professional writer, are you not?  If only one person “misinterpreted” your statements, you could credibly try to spin that as one individual’s error, but you mention “readers” – as in plural – no?  So, I’d say you are either a lousy writer or you were expressing schadenfreude over the possibility of Spencer being shot – the latter interpretation not unreasonable given your “anger” at Spencer and your falling out with him.

What next, Pete?  Going to try and spin Derbyshire asking at your VDARE dump why possession of child porn should be illegal?

This Is Outrageous

A question for the Alt Right.

While Spencer was at Auburn, fighting the good fight, “happy penguin” Pete was emailing; this is an excerpt of an email Brimelow proudly tells us he sent a Jew (emphasis added):

If you read what I sent you at the time, you must realize how angry I was with Richard Spencer…—
But the fact is that he’s introduced more people to the idea of immigration restriction than all the rest of us put together. And he’s just forced Auburn to let him speak there, something that Milo, and Murray, and Mac Donald (and for that matter me) all failed to do.
If it’s any consolation to you, I think it’s just a matter of time until he gets shot.

I wonder what Spencer thinks about that.  Not only has he been “thrown under the bus” by the Alt Wrong, but now the Alt Wrongers are trying to cheer up their Jewish correspondents by giving them the “consolation” that Spencer is likely to get shot.

This is all a bit too much, isn’t it?

My question to the Alt Right is: When are you guys finally going to forcefully denounce the Alt Wrong?  Are you going to wait until they reach the point of actually celebrating if you do actually get shot?

Well, I’ll do some denouncing for them.  Brimelow is a money-grubbing, Jew-loving, low-life, who uses pictures of his own children as a money-making ploy during his frequent “hand-out” campaigns, and who, at the same time, gives a forum to a race-mixing idiot who publicly came out to defend the concept that possession of child porn should be legal (and that argued at VDARE itself).

Why anyone on the (Far) Right continues to associate with these “people” is beyond me.

“Respected” Alt Right Chutzpah

It’s Der Movement!

On a Radix thread, the following series of comments were made (emphasis added):

Laguna Beach Fogey • a day ago

FYI: I hope I’m not speaking out of turn here, but it has been brought to my attention that Richard has been privately approached by respected Alt-Right figures about the increasingly erratic, destructive behaviour of a certain Alt-Right writer (on display in this comment thread below), and has been urged to distance himself and the brand from him.

4  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Alek  Laguna Beach Fogey • a day ago

Jonah Goldberg or Colin Liddell?

6  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Alek  Alek • a day ago

Ben Shapiro or Colin Liddell?

6  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Alek  Alek • a day ago

George Will or Colin Liddell?

6  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Laguna Beach Fogey  Alek • a day ago

lol that fucking cracked me up

5  • Reply•Share ›

Assume for the moment that the initial comment reflects reality. Now, let us consider the various ways this informs us about Der Movement.

1. Who are “respected Alt-Right figures” who can afford to talk about “erratic” or “destructive” behavior of anyone else in their moronic “movement?”  The idea is laughable. In this circus of race-mixers and child porn apologists (*), HBDers, juvenile jackasses, incompetent quota queens, civic nationalists, individuals whose every utterance and action displays poor judgment, breathless fanboys worshiping their “God Emperor,” pseudoscientists and ethnic fetishists, anyone stupid enough to say “Donald Trump is the last chance for White America” – who among that morass of flotsam and jetsam could have the nerve – the chutzpah – to point the finger of criticism toward anyone else in their “Alt Right” cult?

2. Again assuming this is all true, note that an individual who is a commentator at various “movement” blogs apparently knows the inner business of “respected Alt-Right figures.” Good self-control and security there among the lip-flapping womanly gossips of Der Movement.

3. Being privy to this private information, said individual then blabs it on a public forum (Radix, being a well known flagship of the “Alt Right,” is no doubt intensely scrutinized by the opposition) that is read by anyone and everyone, including those “watchdogs” hostile to pro-White activism. Then all the various commentators make a joke about it.

4. Finally, assuming it is Liddell, I’ve been commenting on his flaws and ethnic fetishism for some time.  All that was ignored by Der Movement, which embraced Liddell, hosted his writings, made podcasts with him, etc. Then of course when the comedy descends to depths such as this, then the alarm bells ring.

And these are the “respected” figures and leaders of the “Alt Right,” which will bring us our salvation. Basically, “movement” freakishness, lack of self-control and security, absence of dignity and prudence, and embarrassing feuds and stupidities exemplified by one moronic episode.

The wages of affirmative action go on and on….

*For some inexplicable reason, my response to this nonsense was rejected in moderation, and so is reproduced below:

Before you make your snarky remarks, you probably need to first read what Derbyshire actually wrote.

He doesn’t see what’s the problem with folks possessing and enjoying child porn.  Oh yes, it is “creepy” (much like, in my opinion,  a White male, not man, having an East Asian wife), but he does not see any legal or moral problem with it.

Of course, it is the demand for child porn that creates the supply, so that if Derbyshire has his way, and child porn is legalized, demand will increase, causing more children to be viciously sexually abused, raped, sodomized, even murdered, so that freaks can legally enjoy their “creepy” fun.

Derbyshire is a moral turd, a monster.  If you cannot understand that, let us know when you are back on Earth.

That Derbyshire is a child porn apologist is an indisputable fact.  In his own words, emphasis added:

…there is an anarcho-tyranny angle here that is sufficiently deplorable in itself.  Why should it be a crime to have child porn on your computer?  (Note that the item on the charge sheet about Bukovsky “making” child-porn images is bogus.  As Claire Berlinski explains, under U.K. law just downloading images counts as “making” them.)

Enjoying child porn is weird and creepy to be sure.  I cleave, however, to the old principle that you can’t go to jail for what you’re thinking.  In the Western world of today, as the waters of totalitarian conformity rise all around us, that point of view seems positively quaint.

From one member of the Awkward Squad to another, I offer Vladimir Bukovsky my best wishes.

Der Movement in the News, 9/13/16

Stupidities abound.


I guess macho man Derbyshire is now gonna shoot dem dere racycis who come to his door rather than punch them in the face.  I mean, this guy is so comically ludicrous it is actually cringe worthy.  It’s embarrassing.

Note to Derbyshire: decaying race-mixers, aging Chinatrices, and smug Hapas are not the only ones who know how to fire a gun.  If you want peace, prepare for war, indeed.  


So now White nationalism is being conflated with a bunch of juvenile jackasses and their moronic snark with a cartoon frog.  And I don’t even want to know who or what the hell “Kek” is.  Thanks a lot Alt-Right.  This is one small example of what I’ve been warning about. Grow up, for godssakes.

Fisking Derbyshire, 9/12/16

Derbyshire: outrageous hypocrite.

This is amazing. All emphasis added:


Professor Watson is a race realist. Nine years ago he was in the news for publicly saying that sub-Saharan Africans have a low average intelligence. He had previously said out loud that Ashkenazi Jews have a high average intelligence.


One wonders what gets Derbyshire more excited: low Negro IQ or high Jewish IQ? One also wonders how Watson was treated by the Jewish community whose intelligence he so slavishly praised. More to the point, how many Jews came to Derbyshire’s defense when National Review kicked him to the curb?

Fiddlesticks to hurt feelings. The world, said Wittgenstein, is everything that is the case. Note he did not say, “everything that does not hurt your feelings.”

Uh huh. Is that why Derbyshire essentially invited “racists” who object to his marriage to come to his home so he can punch them in the face? I quote Derbyshire: 

What after all, should one think of someone who insults a stranger`s wife and children from the safe remoteness of an email link?
(In regard to which, if any of these skulking cowards would like to repeat their insults to my face, it is easy enough to find a person`s street address nowadays. Come show up at my door: I`ll gladly receive you in the appropriate manner.)

Yeah, well, fiddlesticks to your hurt feelings – fiddlesticks, I say! – Derbyshire, you disgustingly vile hypocrite.

It’s true we don’t yet know the full genetic architecture of race differences in intelligence. As human-science blogger JayMan says, though: You don’t need to know the name and job title of every worker in the factory to know the factory produces widgets

Yeah, that’s the same Jayman who went on Roissy’s site to object to common sense observations there with the protest “where’s all the peer-reviewed studies,” who won’t accept actual studies on Italian IQ as opposed to Lynn’s “estimates,” and who uses absurd strawman arguments to delegitimize the idea that people genetically more similar have a greater interest in each other than those more distant (i.e., genetic interests).

Well, I’ve been hanging out with Alt-Right types for a while. I’ve known Jared Taylor for twenty years; Peter Brimelow for sixteen; Richard Spencer I think for eight or ten. All have been guests at my house, I am proud to say.

Thanks Derb for that piece of information. I won’t forget it. Say it ain’t so, Richie!

So what, in my opinion, makes the Alt-Right a distinct thing—not by any means a party, a faction, or a movement, but a collection of souls with something in common?
Here’s my answer:
We don’t like flagrant nonsense in the discussion of human affairs. We don’t like being lied to. We especially don’t like being lied to by credentialed academics like Jerry Coyne.

As per “flagrant nonsense” here is Derbyshire’s laughable (and personally self-interested) defense of European-Asian mongrelization, from the same Taylor debate link as above:

In the particular case of European-Asian matches, Jared and I both recently attended a lecture that included a genetic analysis of the Uighurs, a Central Asian people. They are very precisely half European, half Asian.
I have, as it happens, met more than the average number of Uighurs. They seem to me a fine sturdy people not notably lacking in intelligence or afflicted with any very noticeable personality defects. They are certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.
I say again: Pshaw!

By god, Derbyshire has personally met some Uighurs and they seem like fine folks without any “very noticeable personality defects!”  They are “robust enough” to give the Chinese government problems. Hey, Derb, one can meet Negroes without any “very noticeable personality defects” and they are certainly “sturdy” and “robust enough” to give the American government “a lot of trouble.” Let’s hope your daughter marries one, eh? Pshaw!
If you, dear reader, are tempted to laugh at the childish stupidity of Derbyshire’s ”argument” there, keep in mind that is what passes for typical HBD “analysis.” How is that different, for example, from any Breezy Steve post? Or from Lynn’s “estimates” that just so happen (it’s a coincidence, a coincidence I tell you!) to match his IQ-GDP correlations?

The lies are so flagrant, so outrageously obvious, you’d have to laugh at them—if not for the fact that laughing at them is close to being a criminal offense (*).

Since the entire HBD faction of the Alt-Right (aka the Alt-Wrong) is based on lies and distortions, on lies so flagrant you have to laugh at them, all these guys must really, really, really not like themselves.
That’s OK. Can anyone blame them for that?
*Or having an elderly outrageous hypocrite like child porn apologist John Derbyshire threaten a feeble punch because anyone dares send him emails critical of his family? Hey, Derbyshire, just as you say we are not obligated to approve of the Left’s opinions on race, nor are we obligated to approve of your views on miscegenation, or your participation in it. Nor, dear sir, are we obligated to approve of an English illegal immigrant (**) damaging our genetic interests (you know, what Jayman lies to say do not exist) by bringing a Chinatrix to our country.
**More hypocrisy: Derbyshire opposes illegal immigration and amnesty for illegals, even though he himself is an amnestied illegal. Well, he may say, race matters – he’s of the same ancestry as America’s founding stock, and most current illegals are Third Worlders. OK, great, but if race is important in that regard, then your Chinese wife’s East Asian race is also important, you two-faced weasel. You can’t have it both ways – appealing to White racial sentiments to justify your own amnesty while condemning those same sentiments as “crazy” and akin to “latrine flies” when they question “Rosie.” What an obvious disgusting low-down hypocritical piece of filth this Derbyshire is.

Pederasty and Other Perversions

Should we be surprised?

VDARE has been recently shilling for Derbyshire’s book Fire From The Sun (about, what else, China). While I have no interest in reading that trash, I was interested in reading the following comment left about it on Amazon, emphasis added:

Top critical review

See the critical review›

One person found this helpful

1.0 out of 5 starsA Good Book Ruined
ByATon June 13, 2014
Mr. Derbyshire started out writing a great book about early Communist China, and then decided to ruin it with pederasty and other perversions. A great disappointment.

I’m not surprised, given Derbyshire’s strong defense of child porn on VDARE.