Category: child porn

Larson and Counter-Currents

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Read there.  Excerpts, emphasis added;

Among the candidates running against incumbent Rep. Barbara Comstock in Virginia’s Tenth Congressional District is a self-described pedophile who has allegedly admitted he raped his late spouse and advocates what he calls “benevolent white supremacy.” 

After all, this is exactly the kind of press, and public representation, Der Movement needs.  If you in any way question that, you’re obviously “crazy and bitter.”

HuffPost reports that Larson used “Leucosticte” and “Lysander” as user names to post in the chat rooms, where he endorsed child rape and sexual abuse. He reportedly wrote one essay about father-daughter incest and another about raping his ex-wife repeatedly and was asked by HuffPost whether there was a “grain of truth” in the essays. He said there was, and suggested that it’s not uncommon for women to have rape fantasies. 

It is uncommon to write about it and then run for Congress.

Here are some of the agenda items in his lengthy campaign manifesto:

Legalize the possession and distribution of child pornography;

I suppose a certain English (ex) illegal alien will be jumping on the Larson bandwagon.  All aboard!

End minimum age for consumption of alcohol;

That’s the Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right plank of the manifesto.

Repeal Violence Against Women Act. “We need to switch to a system that classifies women as property, initially of their fathers and later of their husbands,” Larson writes; 

I won’t argue too much against that.

Legalize early marriage

How early?

Legalizing suicide. “Legalizing barbiturates, heavy machine guns, etc. makes available reliable and peaceful means of suicide for those who need them,” his manifesto reads;

If he wants to thin the herd, he can start with Der Movement.

Favors right to discriminate;

OK.

Legalize insider trading;

The Jewish plank of the manifesto?

Puts forward the idea that Jewish state should be in “more defensible location,” like the state of New Jersey;

That’s great.  Let’s move Israel to New Wopsey. Fuggedaboutit!

End laws that ban felons from owning firearms.

Self-interest?

Larson’s manifesto also reveres Adolf Hitler as a “white supremacist hero,” as well as Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism.

Did I need to tell you this is a Type I?

On a related issue.

A realistic assessment of our situation is that we simply do not have a ready collective of prepared people who are ready for prime time. We don’t have a network of disciplined organizations full of large numbers of people who are ready and able to effectively present our message to the American public, or take effective, focused action.
Are we working on it? Absolutely.

Absolutely!  After all, Revilo Oliver talked about 50 years of “movement” failure – 50 years ago.  Maybe in another 100 years all the quota queens will have figured it all out, and they can proceed to save both of the White people still existing at that time.

Are we making great strides? Most definitely. Do we have promising candidates? For sure. American Renaissance is an utterly invaluable resource.

Invaluable if you are Jewish or East Asian.

But it is also definitely true that we just aren’t there yet. We’re building it. And do you know what it looks like to build effective organization? It means sorting the wheat from the chaff so we can create something that is all wheat and no chaff—and that means criticizing the chaff so that it can get out of the way and make room for the wheat.

Yes, that’s why I criticize Der Movement in general and Counter-Currents in particular. All the chaff have glass jaws though, good at “punching right” but not at taking a punch.

Notwithstanding the fact that what we stand for are principles that vast numbers of people do (and should) consider common sense, we are a fringe political movement. And fringe political movements attract weirdos no matter what their political position.

A point I’ve made online for, literally, years.

Online movements attract people who have extra time on their hands and choose to spend it reading on the Internet. To make it into our niche in particular, we had to be curious and intelligent enough to read and comprehend essays on things like human biodiversity…

Let’s read and comprehend pseudoscience, that’s the ticket.  We’ll look at the Pyramids of Atlantis next.

…—but not so curious and intelligent that we’d already made a career in academia, where acknowledging these findings would risk ruining everything we’d built. 

Kevin MacDonald.  Frank Salter.  Those are academics. How much support does Salter get from Der Movement?

The situation we are in is intrinsically, inherently paradoxical. To succeed by “democratic” means, we need to reach ordinary people; but we are, by definition, weirdos.

Yes, and let us make ourselves more weird by rambling about “the spectral,” “Kali Yuga,” “the men who can’t tell time,” and other such nonsense.

Furthermore, “public leadership” is a position which is doubly attractive to the worst of peoples’ personality traits. People with families and children whose well-being they care about are inherently less likely to do it, but the more narcissistic a person is, the more likely they will.

Again, I’ve written about this over and over again.  The social pricing problem needs to be solved.  The incompetent affirmative action “movement leadership” are not the ones to do it though.

For a movement whose ideals are built on hierarchy and the elevation of “greatness” as a moral value of central importance, this reluctance to make high demands of those we call “leaders” is especially ironic.

Yes, indeed. And what website are you writing this for?

And for a movement so focused on mocking the modern world’s obsession with “inclusivity” and how this causes everything from the military to firefighting departments and educational faculties to constantly lower their standards regarding actual performance and success, we sure do seem to be demanding a heavy share of standard-lowering “inclusivity” of our own.

Yes, indeed. And what website are you writing this for?

If anything, what we really need is to be a whole hell of a lot more exclusive.

Exclude Counter-Currents.

Advertisements

SESTA and the Alt Wrong

The Derbyshire problem.

After historically opposing changes to the Communications Decency Act’s Section 230, web giants came out in favor of a proposed amendment to the law, which would punish a website for knowingly facilitating sexual exploitation.

This would seem to be something that VDARE should be concerned about.  The logic here:

1. Derbyshire is a (presumably paid) blogger at VDARE.

2. Derbyshire, writing for VDARE, publicly questioned why possession of child porn is illegal. This can reasonably be seen as support for its legalization (possession) .

3. Legalization of the possession of child porn can reasonably be seen as increasing the demand for it.

4. Increased demand for child porn will, through the laws of economics, lead to increased supply to cater to that demand – leading to increased sexual exploitation of children (including, but not limited to, sexual abuse, rape, and possibly kidnapping and murder).

5. Hence, one can question whether points 1-4 would be interpreted as that blog running afoul of the proposed SESTA amendment.  I’m not saying it will or it will not, I’m merely questioning the possibility.  For the sake of prudent prevention, it would therefore be helpful for VDARE to disavow Derbyshire and remove him from their group of writers.

Rotten Orange and VDARE News

Two items.

Australian leader mocks refugee-welcoming weakling cuck Trump.

Well, why not?  He probably out-handshaked him as well.  No worries though!  A few more Trump tweets about “Celebrity Apprentice” ratings and it’ll all be A-OK.

Speaking of VDARE, how about the spectacle of Happy Penguin Brimelow using the GOP baseball practice shooting as a fundraising vehicle?  I’ll let the reader make their own judgment on his character based on that – and his more typical habit of using his family, particularly his young children, as panhandling props (never mind his “cheesecake” pictures accompanying posts and his continued tolerance of a writer who publicly questioned at VDARE why possession of child porn should be illegal).

The good news: VDARE.com’s Summer Fundraising drive is now within $25,000 of its $80,000 total.
The good and bad news: Every single day brings more confirmation of the vital importance of VDARE.com’s role—unfortunately, often tragic.
After Inauguration Day, January 20 2017, I wrote of the Left’s violent temper tantrum in the streets of the nation’s capital: We’re facing what was called in the case of the Civil War an irrepressible conflict. But this is America. People have guns. It will come to blood.
Now, on June 14, 2017, what appears to be a lone Leftist gunman has indeed shed blood—of House Majority Steve Scalise and at least four other victims at a Congressional Republican baseball practice.
There will be more.

Silk Road News: Derb Finds Love

The usual perfidy and stupidity of Asians and those who love them.

Whatever else his (many) faults, Sailer deserves credit for his chronicling of anti-White Asian racial whining.

Colored is as colored does.

Yellow fever race-mixer Derbyshire, he of an unusual marriage, sees no problem in the unusual marriages of others.

My view, heartfelt and frequently stated, is that love is a precious gift, to be cherished and celebrated wherever it may be found.

Well, after all, Derbyshire has publicly questioned why possession of child porn should be illegal, so, yes, it would seem he really believes the part of “wherever it may be found.”

A long time ago, I heard a White woman claim that Yellow Fever is sublimated pedophilia, and there is probably some truth to that, considering the socially awkward White males interested in Yellows and the neotonic character of the Yellows themselves.

Quite the Mendacious Happy Penguin

Failed spin.

Despicable “happy penguin” Brimelow, disturbed at the blowback to his pathetic comments about Spencer, tries to spin it thus:

I got a certain amount of weird harrumphing over my blog congratulating Richard Spencer for his Auburn triumph, because I noted the danger that he will eventually be shot. Incredibly, some readers apparently thought I was advocating his being shot, or somehow making it more likely..

OK, Pete.  In your original post, you note an email correspondence with an anti-Spencer Jew, in which you say this about Spencer:

If it’s any consolation to you, I think it’s just a matter of time until he gets shot.

I don’t know, Petey my boy.  If you blithely talk about someone getting shot being “consolation” to a correspondent, it doesn’t seem like you’d be real upset and all about the possibility.  I mean, Pete, you are a professional writer, are you not?  If only one person “misinterpreted” your statements, you could credibly try to spin that as one individual’s error, but you mention “readers” – as in plural – no?  So, I’d say you are either a lousy writer or you were expressing schadenfreude over the possibility of Spencer being shot – the latter interpretation not unreasonable given your “anger” at Spencer and your falling out with him.

What next, Pete?  Going to try and spin Derbyshire asking at your VDARE dump why possession of child porn should be illegal?

This Is Outrageous

A question for the Alt Right.

While Spencer was at Auburn, fighting the good fight, “happy penguin” Pete was emailing; this is an excerpt of an email Brimelow proudly tells us he sent a Jew (emphasis added):

If you read what I sent you at the time, you must realize how angry I was with Richard Spencer…—
But the fact is that he’s introduced more people to the idea of immigration restriction than all the rest of us put together. And he’s just forced Auburn to let him speak there, something that Milo, and Murray, and Mac Donald (and for that matter me) all failed to do.
If it’s any consolation to you, I think it’s just a matter of time until he gets shot.

I wonder what Spencer thinks about that.  Not only has he been “thrown under the bus” by the Alt Wrong, but now the Alt Wrongers are trying to cheer up their Jewish correspondents by giving them the “consolation” that Spencer is likely to get shot.

This is all a bit too much, isn’t it?

My question to the Alt Right is: When are you guys finally going to forcefully denounce the Alt Wrong?  Are you going to wait until they reach the point of actually celebrating if you do actually get shot?

Well, I’ll do some denouncing for them.  Brimelow is a money-grubbing, Jew-loving, low-life, who uses pictures of his own children as a money-making ploy during his frequent “hand-out” campaigns, and who, at the same time, gives a forum to a race-mixing idiot who publicly came out to defend the concept that possession of child porn should be legal (and that argued at VDARE itself).

Why anyone on the (Far) Right continues to associate with these “people” is beyond me.

“Respected” Alt Right Chutzpah

It’s Der Movement!

On a Radix thread, the following series of comments were made (emphasis added):

Laguna Beach Fogey • a day ago

FYI: I hope I’m not speaking out of turn here, but it has been brought to my attention that Richard has been privately approached by respected Alt-Right figures about the increasingly erratic, destructive behaviour of a certain Alt-Right writer (on display in this comment thread below), and has been urged to distance himself and the brand from him.

4  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Alek  Laguna Beach Fogey • a day ago

Jonah Goldberg or Colin Liddell?

6  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Alek  Alek • a day ago

Ben Shapiro or Colin Liddell?

6  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Alek  Alek • a day ago

George Will or Colin Liddell?

6  • Reply•Share ›

Avatar

Laguna Beach Fogey  Alek • a day ago

lol that fucking cracked me up

5  • Reply•Share ›

Assume for the moment that the initial comment reflects reality. Now, let us consider the various ways this informs us about Der Movement.

1. Who are “respected Alt-Right figures” who can afford to talk about “erratic” or “destructive” behavior of anyone else in their moronic “movement?”  The idea is laughable. In this circus of race-mixers and child porn apologists (*), HBDers, juvenile jackasses, incompetent quota queens, civic nationalists, individuals whose every utterance and action displays poor judgment, breathless fanboys worshiping their “God Emperor,” pseudoscientists and ethnic fetishists, anyone stupid enough to say “Donald Trump is the last chance for White America” – who among that morass of flotsam and jetsam could have the nerve – the chutzpah – to point the finger of criticism toward anyone else in their “Alt Right” cult?

2. Again assuming this is all true, note that an individual who is a commentator at various “movement” blogs apparently knows the inner business of “respected Alt-Right figures.” Good self-control and security there among the lip-flapping womanly gossips of Der Movement.

3. Being privy to this private information, said individual then blabs it on a public forum (Radix, being a well known flagship of the “Alt Right,” is no doubt intensely scrutinized by the opposition) that is read by anyone and everyone, including those “watchdogs” hostile to pro-White activism. Then all the various commentators make a joke about it.

4. Finally, assuming it is Liddell, I’ve been commenting on his flaws and ethnic fetishism for some time.  All that was ignored by Der Movement, which embraced Liddell, hosted his writings, made podcasts with him, etc. Then of course when the comedy descends to depths such as this, then the alarm bells ring.

And these are the “respected” figures and leaders of the “Alt Right,” which will bring us our salvation. Basically, “movement” freakishness, lack of self-control and security, absence of dignity and prudence, and embarrassing feuds and stupidities exemplified by one moronic episode.

The wages of affirmative action go on and on….

*For some inexplicable reason, my response to this nonsense was rejected in moderation, and so is reproduced below:

Before you make your snarky remarks, you probably need to first read what Derbyshire actually wrote.

He doesn’t see what’s the problem with folks possessing and enjoying child porn.  Oh yes, it is “creepy” (much like, in my opinion,  a White male, not man, having an East Asian wife), but he does not see any legal or moral problem with it.

Of course, it is the demand for child porn that creates the supply, so that if Derbyshire has his way, and child porn is legalized, demand will increase, causing more children to be viciously sexually abused, raped, sodomized, even murdered, so that freaks can legally enjoy their “creepy” fun.

Derbyshire is a moral turd, a monster.  If you cannot understand that, let us know when you are back on Earth.

That Derbyshire is a child porn apologist is an indisputable fact.  In his own words, emphasis added:

…there is an anarcho-tyranny angle here that is sufficiently deplorable in itself.  Why should it be a crime to have child porn on your computer?  (Note that the item on the charge sheet about Bukovsky “making” child-porn images is bogus.  As Claire Berlinski explains, under U.K. law just downloading images counts as “making” them.)

Enjoying child porn is weird and creepy to be sure.  I cleave, however, to the old principle that you can’t go to jail for what you’re thinking.  In the Western world of today, as the waters of totalitarian conformity rise all around us, that point of view seems positively quaint.

From one member of the Awkward Squad to another, I offer Vladimir Bukovsky my best wishes.