Category: Coulter

Not Made For Me

Boycott Captain Menstrual and Star Trek Yeastbucket.

Not made for me – perhaps the best video I’ve seen exposing the destruction of superhero/sci-fi entertainment by SJW nonsense.

I guess Gaslighting Greg will tell us these are all up-and-coming Joan of Arcs, who must be – must be! – immune from any and all criticism.

Boycott, boycott, boycott.

Better late than never, Annie.  Question for the readership: Is it more important to realize this about Trump now, after he’s wrecked everything for the past two years, or to have realized this before he was elected, realized all of this during the campaign?

The Retard Emperor.  Donald Downs Trump, aka Donnie Triple 21.

It’s Der Trumpening!

As much as I despise Trump, what McCabe and his fellows did – how is that not an indictable offense?  

It’s dat dere capitalism!  As the Alt Wrong would say: “Sweet business deals.”

Advertisements

Is There a Vaccination Against Stupidity?

The embarrassing Right from Trumpian anti-vaxxers to Trump himself.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Low life scum heard from.

“Here we go LOL #measlesoutbreak on #CNN #Fake #Hysteria,” Darla Shine tweeted. “The entire Baby Boom population alive today had the #Measles as kids … Bring back our #ChildhoodDiseases they keep you healthy & fight cancer.”

So…getting sick keeps you healthy!  And as regards the “hygiene hypothesis” and cancer, see this:

That said, it should be noted that not all types of microorganisms are expected to have the same anticarcinogenic effect; for example, viral infections seem to be mainly procarcinogenic, in contrast to bacteria or parasitic worms that have a longer coevolution history with human species and may have, therefore, adapted to exhibit more antitumorigenic effects.

Thus, viruses (e.g., HPV, hepatitis), which are the targets of most vaccines, tend to promote cancer, while bacteria and parasitic worm infections tend to inhibit cancer.  Maybe the anti-vaxxers can swallow some tapeworm eggs then?

And as far as confusing genetically engineered measles vs. the normal infections strain, see this.  Then we read:

“I had the #Measles #Mumps #ChickenPox as a child and so did every kid I knew,” she went on to claim, adding: “Sadly my kids had #MMR so they will never have the life long natural immunity I have.”

I had those same diseases myself.  The chickenpox wasn’t that bad, and having mumps as a child wasn’t that bad either (male adults are a different story). But measles?  For godssakes – a 105 degree fever?  What the hell?  You want your child to go through that, you stupid bitch?

“Come breathe on me!”

No, let’s try something different.  She’s against vaccination, right? Let her get bitten by a rabid animal and then withhold the vaccine.  Don’t give her medical treatment either – after all, being anti-vaccination is her choice.  Just leave her safely locked in a room for the incubation period, with all the amenities, to wait out the eventual festivities.  Have fun!

In Trump We Trust!  When Coulter talks about Trump fooling all the “rubes,” all those who make up “the stupid element” of his base, why does she think that excludes her?

Do you need any more evidence that your obese God Emperor is a fraud?

Trump may be the most leftist President of my lifetime, and, practically speaking, the most anti-White.  Trump is – by his actions, not his bombastic tweet rhetoric – obviously seething with genocidal animus against European-derived peoples.  Trump the real head of Antifa.  Trump the neo-Marxist.  Trump the gravedigger of White America.

But, hey, who cares, right?  He struts around like Vince McMahon, he “negs” women, he has a “hot” wife (albeit one whose slant-eyed appearance does nothing except justify fetishist stereotypes about Eastern Europeans), and he (“allegedly”) cheated on his (just-had-a-child) “hot” wife with a man-jawed, floppy-breasted, big-boned, horse-faced porn star.

So, quite obviously, he’s the last chance for White America!  In Trump We Trust!  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

Derbyshire gets it, a bit late:

I’m reluctantly coming to the conclusion that the blogger Z-man got it right: Trump’s just a bag of wind, a “bullshitter who got very lucky.” [Not My President, March 1, 2018] He has no political skills and no firm core of belief on political issues. By the latter I mean that if he says something today, six months on he may be saying the opposite thing, with just as much apparent conviction—as indeed he has done on legal immigration.
I’m also getting the impression of a guy who is lazy and timid. By lazy I mean he hasn’t made much effort to improve his understanding of key issues, or to get properly to grips with staffing chores. By timid I mean reluctant to challenge, to throw down gauntlets—like an executive order ending Birthright Citizenship. Sure, it might fail at last, but at least battle would have been joined.
Trump doesn’t want battle, he doesn’t want challenge. He wants to tweet, watch TV, and make gassy speeches full of empty promises that he’ll renege on after his next meeting with Jared.

Oh, yes, Derbyshire, you low-life filthy scum, it was “Zman” who discovered that Trump was a fraud, back in March 2018.  Right?

It’s not as if anyone had realized any of this even before your retarded, lipid-encrusted, orange-hued, semi-retarded, porn-star-rawdogging, jackass of a God Emperor was even elected, eh?

From Trump to Princess Coconut

The Grifter Emperor.

Trump is a souless grifter, a fraud who has no other real beliefs than his own self-interest.

We can judge his recent admission of being a proponent of mass immigration (i.e., White genocide) in this light.

I suppose Trump’s “thoughts” (insofar as his limited mentality is capable of thinking) on the matter is as follows.

He is skeptical he can cobble together the same Electoral College majority as in 2016. He may well believe that his only chance of winning in 2020 is making the election into a traditional Neocon Republican vs.Liberal Democrat “you conservative White guys have no place else to go” contest, where appealing to the GOP elites and to White suburban yeastbuckets, coupled to the remnants of his dwindling original base, and augmented by centrist Republican voters stampeded into voting by visions of a dastardly Democrat President, would be enough for victory.

On the other hand, he knows that even that sort of victory is by no means assured.  He may well lose in 2020 – he’s lost a significant portion of his base, elements of the GOP Establishment will never trust him, the Left hates him no matter how far to the left he shifts politically (similar to Nixon – they hate him personally more than they hate him politically).  It may well be that 2020 is a disaster.  If that is so, he knows that he and his family is in big trouble legally, politically, socially, etc. Victorious Democrats will press for indictments, he and his family will be socially shunned and economically isolated – a personal disaster (who cares about America?).

Thus, the idea is to spend the next year-and-a half cucking, shifting left, supporting the Neocon agenda, being a friend of Color, and throwing his “deplorable” White base under the bus – all in the hope that anger against him subsides after 2020 and/or some elements of the Neocon Establishment will come to his defense.

So, it is all about a long shot attempt of assembling a centrist Neocon electoral coalition, and, then, if he loses, having established his anti-White bonafides so he’ll be forgiven by the Establishment and be allowed to drift back to his business enterprises – without the orange jumpsuit.

There is another possibility.   Perhaps Trump, with his infantile bloated ego, has been stung by Coulter’s criticism, so, like a petulant child throwing a tantrum, he’s going to “teach her a lesson” by supporting mass immigration.  That sounds about right – betraying his supporters and ruining America just to get back at a critic.

I’m no fan of Drawbridge Christie or Antifa Sessions, but Trump’s treatment of his earliest political supporters tells us something about his character.  The man cares about nothing or nobody except himself (and perhaps praying mantis look-a-like Ivanka as well).  Do you really believe he cares about the suffering of White America?  

Lest you get all depressed over this, do not despair!  After all, grass-skirted Princess Tulsi Coconut is going to save us, leading us to final victory!

I admit to being foolishly naive. I honestly believed that Der Movement would wait a decent interval – perhaps a year – after the collapse of the God Emperor narrative before latching on to a new hero or heroine.  But, no. Just like a spurned lover on the rebound, “movement leaders” just cannot wait to set themselves up for the next embarrassing disappointment.

These guys couldn’t do more damage than if they were trying to do so intentionally.

The Other Shoe Has Dropped

Trump unmasked as The Genocide Emperor.

Watch this, focusing on the comments about Trump.

And now, read this, emphasis added:

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he’s now in favor of more legal immigration because of economic gains on his watch.

Trump raised eyebrows in his State of the Union speech Tuesday when he said he wanted people “to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally.” His policy positions to date do not reflect that wish. Asked Wednesday during a meeting with regional reporters whether the line represented a change in policy, Trump said it did.

“Largest numbers ever”…Since most – virtually all – of these newcomers will be non-European, this is race replacement, this is genocide, and this is biological, cultural, social, economic, and political dispossession.  Keep in mind that Whites have an increasing death rate, dying from despair, with the dispossession championed by Trump being a key part of that.

Thus: Trump the avatar of White genocide.  Trump the advocate of mass non-White immigration.  Trump the promoter of White Death.  Trump the genocidal lunatic, seething with animus toward European-derived peoples.  Trump the architect of the Great Replacement.

Now, I am sorry, but I need to bring up the past.  Let us make some useful comparisons.

The “movement” about Trump since 2015: The God Emperor, In Trump We Trust, an American Caesar who will stabilize White demographics, the movement won the election, we memed Trump into office – wild, fervent, almost onanistically homoerotic support.

Ted Sallis about Trump since 2015: A fraud, a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negrophilic race cuck, Touchback Trump (as a champion of “touchback” immigration – the illegals can come in as long as they go home first and re-apply), Amnesty Don, can’t be trusted, his only objection to illegal immigration is the illegality – he supports legal immigration, etc.  I also noted that the only reason to support Trump is that his persona and bombastic statements, when coupled to America’s culture of anti-White hysteria, “triggers” the Left, causing division and chaos.  I was right about that as well.

Long time readers of this blog will be familiar with all of this.  But now, it is time to speak plainly. Now that the other shoe has dropped, and Trump is revealed for what he truly is (and even if he “walks back” these comments under pressure, “the cat is out of the bag”), it is time to hold the Trump fanboys accountable.

Thus, I openly call them out. They should RESIGN from the “movement” – or at least RESIGN from any position of “leadership.”  They should shut down their websites and blogs, they should stop panhandling, and they should just go away and ponder their perpetual bad judgment, their inability to admit error, their defective character – all of it.  Now, I know they won’t do it.  Instead, they’ll just continue rolling along, making the same horrendous world historical mistakes over and over and over again.  After all, it’s time to put all our effort into supporting “Tulsi” now, right?  The God Empress!  The Semi-Samoan Hindu Princess who will usher in the White Millennium!

I will not be so crude as to openly name those who should – if they any sense of decency whatsoever – resign. No, but let us instead use euphemistic nicknames.  The following is not an exhaustive list, but gives a “flavor of accountability,” to coin a phrase:

Mr. HuWhite, The High Trust Kid, Hobbit Hole, Lady Raine’s Little Weasel, In Mud We Trust, Mophead and Rosie’s Pet, The Drunken Bard of Alexandria, Gamblin’ Man…well, you get the picture.

Thursday News

More stupidity.

Not bad, Ann, not bad.  What?  It only took you 3.5 years to realize the same thing I was saying back in mid-2015.  A one, a one, a one-two-three….

23andMe retardation – if Jews are distinct from Europeans, then why does your company list Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry as “European?”  You admit that they’re distinct yet you still place them there.  This is proof positive that (1) labels given by testing companies have no connection to objective reality; and (2) they know that what they are doing is wrong, but they still do it.

At this point, I think the companies should just label ancestral components with neutral labels – e.g., “A,B, C, D, E, etc.” and then we can observe what combination of components are diagnostic of different ethnies.  But, alas, while that would be more objective, it wouldn’t be good for sales now, would it?

Have fun!  After all, why shouldn’t the Strzok types have access to “hater” DNA?  What could go wrong?

In an email to its users on Sunday, the company’s president, Bennett Greenspan, defended the agreement with the F.B.I. but apologized for not revealing it sooner.

Another thing I’ve noticed is the following.  Say that Population A is one of the categories listed on a company’s ancestral breakdowns.  Population A we know is composed of individual ethnic groups U,V, X, X,Y,Z.  So, A is a regional or sub-racial group.  Then, the company will state that ancestry from Population C is a component of the ancestry of Population A, but then show individuals of A ancestry represented as composites of A and C.

Here we see the problem.  If C is part of the genepool of A, and A is a separate category with its own designation, then how can members of A be A+C if C is already considered part of A?  You can wave hands around and say that some people have more C than is the average of A, but if you follow the logic of the company’s designation that doesn’t seem like the fundamental explanation.  After all, if they say that C is a component of A and is typically seen with A and if A is its own category, then any C that is part of A should simply be part of the identity of A and should not be reported separately.  The C cannot be at the same time part of, and separate from, A.

I believe that the real solution to this problem is that Population A is being identified with a parental population that is mostly composed of U, or maybe U and V, and the other ethnic components of A are ignored as parental populations. If the ancestral origins of X has more C than does the origins of U, and if A is being defined as U, then X is going to equal some portion of U and some portion of C. However, the U is used to define A, so X becomes A+C, even though C is a component of A.

Solutions to this is could be to include all the components of A as parentals for A, or simply rename A as U and stop pretending that it is broader than U, or have X as a separate population label with its own parental population.  But to continue pretending that although A = U it is suitable for the totality of U-Z is inappropriate, and will lead to paradoxical results and interpretations.

My question at this point is whether the companies understand this (if they do not – that is frightening) or whether they simply do not want to confuse customers (and lose potential sales by being upfront about the important nuances of interpretation – which would be contemptible).

But, hey, it’s all good for folks with names like Greenspan, so what’s not to like?

Sunday News

In der news.

All together now: Cuckadoodledoo!

Didn’t I warn you that this guy is a buffoon and a fraud?

The last chance for White America!  The God Emperor!

Spencer is correct: Trump as any sort of “change agent” is finished.  I could have told you that (and did) three and more years ago, but, hey, better late than never.

Hey, Ann, I could have told you all of that back in 2015.

Once again, Sallis is right.  Mainstreaming always fails because your more centrist position can always be co-opted by the System and/or by other, more moderate, populists.  If you stake out a radical position that truly represents what you are (or should be) about, then one of two things happen – either you distinguish yourself from the opposition and thus stand alone or you force the opposition to shift toward you, moving the so-called “Overton Window” in the proper direction.  As to the cries – “oh, you won’t’ win” – please tell me about the success of President Le Pen.  You should win or lose standing on principle, rather than lose as a compromised fraud.  At the very least, if you stand your ground, you know that any success is authentic and due to shifting people toward you, rather than vice versa.

Note to micks who still identify as “liberal Democrats” and who spite WASPs by identifying as “oppressed Hibernians in solidarity with People of Color.”

Watch this.  Of course, Greg Johnson was telling us it was really a “win” for Trump (and, implicitly, I suppose, for all of us), because those wonderful Republican “didn’t lose as badly as they could have.”

Reality here – not delusional debate about “when we will win our victory.” Things are bad and getting worse.  I assume the mindset of the “optimism crowd” – if we assume that they are sincere and not merely boosting their egos and cash flows – is that despair will lead to inaction and surrender, so we have to give people hope. Unfortunately, constant disappointment, and constantly dashed hopes, leads to disgust, and, yes, despair and inaction; falsely inflated hope that “all will be well” also can lead to inaction as people believe that “it’ll all work out in the end regardless of what I do or don’t do.”  Reality is best.

Kevin, if you are going to talk about gravity, it is churlish not to mention Einstein and General Relativity.

I’m no fan of Einstein or his ethny, but fair is fair.

“I’m not surprised you’ll get different results from different companies,” Dr. Jennifer Raff, Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology at the University of Kansas told TechCrunch back in September. “They have their own proprietary info based on those samples. If one of them has lots of individuals from a particular region and the other company does not, you’re more likely to show up as having ancestry from that region whereas if the other company doesn’t have that data represented in their database, it’s going to show up as a different population.”

What the parental populations are is going to significantly affect the results.

This reminds me of a personal anecdote. A family I know – normies not Nutzis – asked me to take a look at some confusing ancestry data they got from a company that shall remain nameless.  No problem with paternity – child has 50% chromosome match with father as well as mother, etc.  The ancestry percentages for the child are very crudely plausible based on the parents. So far, fine as well as it goes.  But the chromosomal fragments do not match.  Thus, for example, the child inherits some percentage of ancestry “X” from the mother and not the father (who lacks it, according to the test). But, the mother’s “X” is on, say, chromosomes 3, 5,and 6 (I don’t remember the exact details) and the child’s “X “is on, say, chromosomes 10 and 16. That of course is at the lower confidence levels.  At the highest confidence level, all of those chromosome fragments are “unassigned.”  So, putting aside a historically novel medical finding of mass chromosomal translocations resulting in a normal child (a probability roughly equal to picking one specific atom out of all those in the observable universe), we are left with the reality that the chromosome fragment identifies at the low confidence intervals are being assigned with the precision of a coin flip.  A fragment may be “X” but very likely could be “Y.”  Or maybe the father actually has “X” – and this is where the child is getting it – but the father’s chromosome fragment is instead labeled “Y” at the low confidence interval and “unassigned” at the higher.  Thus, maybe it is really the father who has “X” at the chromosome fragments that would match the child but the test is assigning those fragments to a different ancestry, while perhaps the mother has little or no “X” at all. If you take the low confidence level data at face value, then this all makes no biological sense at all. Recombination normally takes place between homologous chromosomes, not between non-homologous ones.

These companies would be better served to just estimate ancestry from SNP frequency data and/or genome-wide correlations of SNP frequencies (genetic integration) rather than making low probability guestimates of chromosome fragment identity.  However, the latter method is I suppose better for telling crazed cat ladies that they are descended from Pocahontas, so there’s that.

In addition, the companies’ “timeline” estimates are ludicrous, and cannot be used to “time” admixture, even if the admixture is real and not artefactual.  Putting aside the question as to whether the chromosome fragments are properly identified to begin with, and whether the boundaries between purported different ancestral fragments are also properly identified, an important point is being missed (many academic population geneticists make the same possibly incorrect assumptions).  In a large panmictic population, certainly over time you’ll have sufficient scrambling of ancestries so that in an individuals there will be sufficient possibility for meiotic recombination to mix fragments between homologous chromosomes and this breaks up ancestral blocs over time, allowing for an estimation of the arrival of the intrusive elements. But if a small population was interbreeding in isolated communities, then it is possible to have individuals with very high ancestral proportions of the original intrusive stocks, and given mating over time between such individuals any exchanges of chromosome fragments would likely be between fragments of like ancestry.  So large blocs of a given ancestry can be maintained over time, and only start degrading in size relatively recently, given increased human movement.  But let’s not have real life possibilities interfere with the business model.  Send in the shekels!  Pocahontas awaits!

 

How any of this is any better than DNAPrint (was flawed as well) is unclear to me.

Sunday Movement Roundup

Race and Der Movement.

“Based” Poland!  Visegrad! Ethnonationalism!

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

And, hey, I thought that Poles are “ethnocentric ‘Outer Hajnal’ Eastern Europeans.”  What happened? Maybe, just maybe (consider it) all of this “Hajnal line” nonsense is just more HBD flim-flam designed to divide Europeans against each other.  Yes, there are biocultural-behavioral differences among Europeans, but these are gradients, not sharp distinctions.  Poles may be a bit more on the ethnocentric spectrum than, say, Swedes (which is not saying much), but it obviously doesn’t protect them from the blowback from multiracial globalism.  All of this HBD nonsense would never have gone anywhere among racial activists if it wasn’t for the fossilized dogma and ethnic fetishism of the Type I retards of Der Movement. They have a lot to answer for.

One theme here recently is how HBDers try to appeal to Type I ethnic fetishists in order to derail White nationalism.  The emphasis on “David Reich’s data say Aryans invaded India” is one such example – because the word “Aryan” means different things to different people. To legitimate scholars, essentially, the ANI component in modern Indians is from Central Asian steppe people who were most likely more akin to modern Iranians than to anything else.  To Der Movement, it all means “blonde Nordics built the Taj Mahal.”  The HBDers are aware of, and exploit, these differences in perception.  

Spencer criticizes Puritans (who he calls “the worst people of the White race” – “horrible people”) – criticizing a major segment of America’s New England founders.  What’s interesting is that someone like myself who has never made any comments like that was wrongly accused of “bashing the founders” – while I don’t recall anyone criticizing Spencer for actually – and vehemently – doing such bashing.  Those affirmative action protections for “movement leaders” are really airtight, huh?

I agree with Spencer about pessimism being more realistic than airhead optimism. Is the King of Hobbits and the King of Racial Phenotype listening?

Is Spencer’s personal problems making him more Russia-skeptical?

Let’s not stereotype Italians, Richie, it’s not all olive oil.  The relevance of comparing the economies of Russia and Italy is that Russia is much larger than Italy in land mass and population, Russia is resource-rich while Italy is resource-poor, and Russia is a major military power while Italy obviously is not.

I agree with the fellow (Jason I believe his name is) who said non-White anti-White racism is based on envy, and I have written on this before.  And I agree on the description of anti-White Whites as well – intra-racial envy.

It’s all about punishment and revenge.  And the comparison between numbers is true with respect to racial accomplishment.  Compare, for example, some of the swarthoid regions of Europe with China – the former having accomplished more for human progress than the latter despite the latter having 1-2 (or more) orders of magnitude more people.  We can productively enrage the HBDers with this.  I can think of one small area that between the world wars presented to us Evola, Gentile, Majorana, and Pirandello (Cannizzaro died in 1910) – and then we have China, with a population a couple of hundred times larger, which at that time produced who?  Mao?  

I’ll say that overall that was a good podcast and I note that Spencer is behaving somewhat more mature with these people compared to the Alexandria VA-Brewery Boys crowd – until near the end, when he started behaving like a Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right jackass again.  He almost made it…too bad he couldn’t go the distance. Maybe next time.

The voice of WN 3.0, right Greg? How can we trust Johnson’s judgment?  About the “voices of WN 3.0” or about anything else, including Trump?  At least now Spencer is turning against Trump, while Counter-Currents regaled us about how the mid-term elections were really a win for their tin god, and scolded any of us who thought otherwise.

Nationalism

Allied to this growing militarism was an intense nationalism in most of the Great powers. Weltpolitik or the desire for world power status was very popular in Germany. The French desire for revenge over Alsace and Lorraine was very strong. In Britain Imperialism and support for the Empire was very evident. This nationalism meant that there was little resistance to war in these countries. Many welcomed what they thought would be a short, victorious war. For example the outbreak of war was greeted by cheering crowds in Berlin, Vienna and Paris. As A P J Taylor wrote “the people of Europe leapt willingly into war.”

Durocher:

More importantly, the EU was not in fact the source of Britain’s demographic problems. True, the indigenous English and Celts of Britain are being replaced by virtue of the EU’s free movement of people, but mostly by European migrants. For the most part, these are quite assimilable and hard-working, and represent relative demographic gain…British patriots need to keep their eye on the ball: national sovereignty, good relations with their fellow Europeans, and, above all, keeping Britain British!

So – we will keep “Britain British” by replacing native Britons with Poles and Romanians?

Behold the pathetic loser.  Exchange real-time amnesty for invasive scum in exchange for a “wall” that likely won’t be built or that will be only modestly useful if actually built.  The Quota Kings have more testosterone than does The God Emperor.

We need today what Oliver described as The National Youth Alliance 50 years ago.

While I despise Welton, the following should make all of the “but, but, but…Joan of Arc” white knighters weep:

Males must not be ashamed of being males. The downside of being male is inseparable from the upside: the fact that it is men who have been responsible for pretty much anything of consequence ever accomplished by human race.

A picture for the ethnic fetishists.  All are prime candidates to be let into an “extreme vetted” “movement” meeting.  Especially the one third from left.  He’s from southern Sweden. The far south. Or maybe he’s just a S. Italian immigrant?

Some possible Presidential/Vice-Presidential ticket combinations – all in jest of course:

Spencer/Conte

Spencer/Jorjani

Spencer/Johnson

Johnson/Parrott

Parrott/Heimbach

Duke/Hart

Taylor/Linder

Daniel S/Captain Chaos

McCulloch/Sallis….or…Sallis/McCulloch?

Unfortunately, the Williams/Covington ticket has been derailed by Covington’s death.