First, read this, emphasis added:
At a timeout late in his team’s victory over Chicago’s Raw Athletics on Sunday morning, Houston Raptors coach Bobby Benjamin sensed that an already contentious basketball game might soon turn violent.
The opposing team had become increasingly frustrated at its inability to cut into a double-digit deficit, so Benjamin warned his players to be prepared to exit the floor without shaking hands at the final buzzer rather than risk potential fisticuffs.
“Their players started fighting amongst each other and they were arguing with their coach,” Benjamin said. “That’s when I knew it was about to get bad. I figured if they’re going to fight with each other, they might be willing to fight anybody.”
Proof that Benjamin was right to be worried arrived a few minutes later when an otherwise typical grassroots basketball game devolved into a series of wild brawls between Raw Athletics players and the referees. Raw Athletics players threw a flurry of punches at one referee during the mayhem and surrounded him as he lay prone on the court. The same players also tackled another referee to the floor after he sprinted over from an adjacent court in an attempt to intervene.
Then, watch this.
An innate tendency toward violence. Now, SJWs will chime in and talk about “White mass shooters” or “millions dead in White wars” (thanks, ethnonationalists). But we see differences here. Mass shooters are a very rare occurrence; all races have unstable outliers among their population. All races fight wars as well, although one would expect that the better organized, more disciplined, and more technically competent races would result in wars that are more destructive. Some races use trained mass armies, tanks, and bombers and others use spears. Naturally, the death toll of the wars of the former will be greater than that of the latter. War is a natural human condition. Violence is as well, but it is the nature of Negro violence that separates it from that of Whites and some other races. Negro violence is very spontaneous, uncontrolled, mindlessly lashing out over the most trivial reasons. And not only is Negro violence differently qualitatively but also quantitatively – compare rates of violent crime between racial groups.
Think about it. You hear that players attack referees at a basketball game. Did you have any doubt as to the racial provenance of the players? A video clip of a traffic light road rage incident – by female attackers no less and with one wielding a baton – did you think they would be anything other than Negro?
Most honest people have an innate sense that a large fraction of the Negro population are on a hair-trigger, ready to engage in violence for the slightest reason – or sometimes, no reason at all. That’s a difference: while all races have rare outliers that exhibit hair-trigger violent outbursts, in the Negro race, such volatile and dangerous individuals make up a very significant fraction of the population, so much so that one is justified viewing the typical member of that race with prudent suspicion.
As to mechanisms? Likely differences in brain structure and function, levels of neurotransmitters and hormones, and how all those physiological factors interact to respond to environmental stimuli. The evolutionary explanation has already been given by others many times, to summarize: in the Negro’s tropical homeland, food is plentiful year-round, there’s no winter to speak of and seasonal variation is mostly the amount of rain that falls, yet there are predators, diseases, and parasites galore. Thus, there was little or no adaptive value for prudent foresight, self-control, planning, and discipline. On the other hand, being impulsive to take advantage of opportunities, a readiness for instant violence against predators, and a r-selected lifestyle to make up for losses due to diseases and parasites – that was all adaptive.