Category: Daniel S

Against Silver, 7/3/16

Spencer beware, don’t let Radix become another Majority Rights.

Silver on Radix comments on me thus: 

I’ve never known to him merely heartily disagree with someone. He permits people an inch of disagreement and no more. If they step an inch farther beyond their allotted bounds he denounces them as furiously as if they’d stepped a mile farther.

He’s mentally unstable/ill is my guess. What other conclusion can you really draw about someone who’d say:
Durocher, the enemy of the White race. Durocher: the lowest form of filthy scum imaginable. Durocher: an embarrassment to the great French people. Durocher: the human turd. A prime objective of any White ethnostate will be hunting down scum like Durocher for trial, with the ultimate penalty as the outcome.
Admittedly, he was particularly unhinged in that self-contained passage, but his site is peppered throughout with sophomoric claptrap like “dedicated anti-white activist Durocher”, “Play the piano, Durocher, play it well” [ie we’ll string you up with piano wire], “Any sane White ethnostate would put Durocher on trial and execute him.”
Truth be told, I didn’t realize how bad he was until I ctrl-f’d his site for those statements just now. He’s never had anything nice to say about me either, but in my case it’s somewhat justifiable (not that I like it, but in the sense that our values diverge so much and I’ve irritated him enough that it’s unsurprising). But there’s minimal daylight between his own position and Durocher’s, when you get down to the brass tacks. You really have to be quite sick in the head to savage someone on your own side like that.
I think the fact that he established himself early on as an EGI maven is the only things that keeps him ’employed’ (so to speak) in the minds of Alt Righters and WNs (like Greg Johnson)

Right…hey, I thought I was only writing about “testing?” Now, it’s EGI. Interesting that Johnson for example would publish my work on a wide variety of topics, including comic books, but I guess that’s only because we’re really interested in the ethnic genetic interests of Galactus vs. the Red Skull. My work, my output over the years speaks for itself. 
Readers unaware of Silver should study this, and particularly this, as well as this, and especially this.
Of course, Silver neglects to quote from his own unhinged ravings, such as: 

Who cares what that shiteating asshole thinks? Are you that goddam thick, Dave Johns, that you can’t understand what a pure, unadulterated asshole that vermin is? Are you that damn thick that you can’t realize the only reason he can’t fairly characterize my position is that I mock his absurd attempts to whiten himself with his “tests”? That the whole reason he’s such a grouch is that he feels vulnerable about his whiteness and feels compelled to savage and ridicule anyone and everyone even a smidgeon less white than what his exacting standards require, even though doing so is not remotely required for advancing a pro-white agenda (*), and is, in fact, counterproductive? Are you that damn thick? Sadly, I think the answer is yes, you are that damn thick. Try this, Davey boy: think for yourself. If you can pinpoint anything I say (now, not one year ago—which is the only thing shiteater has to go on) which you think compromises white interests, let’s have you bring it up. Otherwise, pay attention to what I actually say; not to what self-interested shiteaters claim I say.

Ahhh…Silver. First, you unmitigated fraud, much of the bombast on this site (and my other blogs) is a “put-on” and subtly “tongue-in-cheek.” I’ve said as much a number of times (*), but an outright liar such as yourself is either too mendacious or stupid to admit it. The misanthropic style – perfected to an extent that you believe it 100% serious – is mimicked from certain other race bloggers who you have praised in the past (because their obsessions assist in your underlying objectives) – proving that your criticisms of my alleged instability are personally/politically motivated. In my case, you see it as “mental illness” and in the cases of others they are just being “indefatigable,” don’t you know. 
Anyway, Spencer and all other race bloggers should be wise to Silver, who jumps from one racialist blog to another, leaving wreckage behind. The main case study is Majority Rights. Pre-Silver, it was an interesting blog that featured a wide number of bloggers and many, many commentators (some stupid, but some good). Post-Silver, the blog is a disaster: apparently, the only people blogging are the site-owner Guessedworker, Daniel S, and – believe it or not – a person claiming to be an East Asian female. There are maybe half-a-dozen regular commentators there now, and that half-a-dozen includes the aforementioned three regular bloggers (as well as someone – who I take it is Daniel S himself – leaving multiple comments under bizarre descriptive webonyms). 
Is Silver responsible for that? Yes (and GW as well for tolerating all of this). My analogy would be as follows. Imagine a class full of high-energy students, most of them good students, who if held in place by a properly strict teacher can produce solid academic accomplishments. Introduced into this class is a trouble-maker, a mischief-maker, a disruptor, who wants to ruin the teaching environment and turn the students against each other (and against the teacher). If the teacher is too weak and/or naive and lets the trouble-maker take control of the situation, then the classroom environment is ruined, no one learns, other trouble-makers are emboldened, and the serious students say “the hell with it” and transfer elsewhere. That is precisely what happened to Majority Rights. Spencer should go to the blog today, and then look back at the archives pre-Silver (say, 2005 and 2006) and compare. And then, if he’s smart, Spencer will kick Silver the hell off of the Radix commenting boards and never let it return. Don’t be another GW, Richard. 
And consider what Silver said about his one-time benefactor GW and of the wreck that the fraud Silver produced at a once excellent blog: 

Too true. What a damnable fool GW turned out to be. Even as early as 2005 and 2006 some were wondering whether he didn’t have a screw loose, but a great deal of quality material was being turned out in those days so the danger didn’t seem so obvious. The arrival of DanielS on the front page unquestionably signaled the end; I hope there’s a special circle of hell reserved for that lunatic.

Will he one day say the same about Spencer and Radix (after destroying that blog)?
And my hostility to Durocher? Because he’s a fraud (in more ways than one**), a “try hard,” a superficial “analyst” whose productions do more harm than good. In a sense, Durocher is – possibly – a cleverer, more serious, more strategic type of Silverian-style fraud himself. Similar patterns – the varying memes and personas (in more ways than one, eh?) – going from a moderate mainstreamer to a Hitlerian Nutzi, for example, or shifting from pan-European to Nordicist from post to post, making outrageous lies about population genetics. I don’t trust him and with each post my distrust only grows. Do I really think he should be “strung up with piano wire” or should he just be ridiculed? More likely the latter, but don’t tell that to lying scum like Silver. 
* For example, in October 2015, on my RLP blog I wrote: 

Public service announcement: one wonders if the foreign readers understand that the blog is a tongue-in-cheek parody of imbecilic “gamesters,” mendacious HBDers, and moronic American “movement” Nutzis.
Of course, the underlying memes are accurate and serious, but, at some point, all of the aforementioned groups are so tragicomic that ridicule is the best approach for deconstruction.

**That I’m the only one that seems to notice something laughably obvious is a fairly good indication of the absolute stupidity – and here I am 100% serious – of Der Movement.


Chinese Perfidy in Italy

Another fine example of “Silk Road White Nationalism” I assume.

Hey!  I though Desmond Jones says that Italy is 100% ethnically/racially homogeneous to the end of time, forever and ever, amen.

Seriously though, can one believe the arrogance of these Chinese?  They infest the homeland of another people, cause problems, and then complain and protest when the natives crack down.  Arrogant Asians – is that a redundancy?

Is this an example of the “Chinatowns” in European cities and European borderlands that are going to help “defend the West?”

Asians are your enemy White man, and if Whites survive the current Jewish-led revolt of the Global South, in the long term, the Yellow Peril may turn out to be the greatest peril of them all (*)

*See the end of the chapter “Hitler Takes Command” in Irving’s Hitler’s War to see Saint Adolf’s prudent opinions on that topic.

Part of the Grand Strategy of Asians

Pimping out the Asiatrices.

Did the Chinese actually sell their daughters in 1978? Are we talking wives or prostitutes?

What about today?

Look, even though many Asian men do not like it, a part of the grand strategy of Asians, as a race, is to pimp out their females to White nerds, so as to facilitate the Asian colonization/infiltration of the West.
Fact is, the Asiaphilia common to Whites is almost exclusively found among White males (not men), and no doubt there is a “yellow fever” connection to it. Even among the Right, one can look at HBDers, some of whom are/were married to Asiatrices (Derbyfogle, Murray, Brand), and so-called “pro-White” sites that include female (of course) Asian bloggers, sites that promote Asian colonization of White lands as part of what we can call “Silk Road White nationalism.”
And among the White masses, the male fetish for Asians dampens White resistance to Asian immigration and upward mobility; note with all the hysteria about Trump and his plans for Mexicans and Muslims, no one critiques the Asian invasion of White lands.

Of Weevs, Movements, and Chinamen

One reason why I dislike Der Movement.

Is Weev a good guy, as suggested here? Or is he a bad guy, as suggested here?

I haven’t the slightest idea. I have insufficient data to make any conclusion. I never heard of this fellow until the Counter-Currents interview, and then did online searching that led to the Majority Rights post. 
This is exactly why I despise and distrust Der Movement: a shadowy world of accusations and counter-accusations, a bizarre conglomeration of strange personalities and weird memes, the contrast between an honest suspicion about infiltrators and self-destructive paranoia, the embrace of enemies and rejection of friends, the accusation of “Jew!” to anyone you disagree with vs. the fact that Jews and other anti-racists do in fact try to infiltrate and troll pro-White activism, the complete lack of standards, the very public airing of dirty laundry, the lack of common sense and a sense of proportion, the constant feuds based on personality rather than ideas, unstable individuals who change their worldviews and personas from month-to-month, the tendency to believe anything one finds posted on the Internet, the embrace of individuals without any “vetting” process (desperation for supporters), a complete lack of strategy and long-term vision that leads to nitpicking analysis of every utterance of perceived “movement” enemies, the embrace of anyone (even non-Whites) who profess – or pretend to profess – sympathy to “the cause” – etc.

A counter-argument would be that marginal personalities and problems exist everywhere, including in the mainstream of the System.  That’s true enough, but misses the point: the System is powerful enough to withstand the accident of individual deficiencies, while a weak dissident entity such as Der Movement, on the razor’s edge of survival, can be ruined by the plethora of defectives.  Therefore, the unpleasant and sour stench of personal feuds, trolling, uncertain people with vague ancestries, HBD worship of Jews and Asians, “movement” obsessions and fetishes, shadowy accusations and counter-accusations – all of that is deadly.  The System can survive that (at least for now), Der Movement cannot.

In addition, while I have no opinion on the dueling opinions linked to above, I do have an opinion on this:

This kind of vainglory printing-out in China works against projects like MR’s, to build regional alliance between Asia and Europe. 

Moreover, what sincere White Nationalist would hack Chinese printers to announce “global White supremacism” ? Most probably none. 

But a Jewish sponsored troll, trying to prevent Chinese and White cooperation just might.

MR’s tiresome Asiaphlia and fantasies that Asians are anything other than a deadly enemy of Whites is wrong, as is the song-and-dance that anyone critical of Asians (or who dare offend Imperial Oriental sensibilities by hacking swastika printouts to the ever-sensitive Chinamen) is a “Jewish (sponsored) troll” (or, “sucks Jewish cock”). In fact, East Asians are very eager to ally themselves with Jews as part of the anti-White rising tide of color:

The second development concerns the growth of interest – both within Israeli officialdom and the activist pro-Israeli American Jewish community – in China itself. This interest mirrored the global enthusiasm surrounding China’s rise observed globally, but by the 2000s it had morphed (in ways that interestingly mimic similar tendencies in Arab countries at roughly the same time) into a more obviously strategic interest in the role China might play in the Middle East. This is augmented by the perception that China’s cultural, religious and political foundations (its lack of an anti-Semitic legacy and presumed “Oriental” civilizational affinity with Jews)…

Note the implicit admission by Jews that they are not European or Western but rather “Oriental” – an admission of truthful accuracy.

…render it a potential friend and even ally of Israel and the global Jewish community. This is reinforced still further when taking into account China’s interest in Israeli technology (where considerable academic cooperation takes place) and weaponry…

Of course. Why create yourself, when you can purchase, copy, and/or steal from others? After all, that’s the East Asian way.

….hand in hand with its complete disinterest in participating in any economic sanctions against Israel, BDS or otherwise. The appeal of this is accentuated – in the eyes of the Israeli and Jewish-American right-wing – by the fact that it comes at a time when Europe and even the U.S. appear to be succumbing – according to Netanyahu at least – to a “wave of Islamization, anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.”

Jews see China as a potential ally. And that view is heartily reciprocated.

It is worth underlining that much of the early engagement between Chinese academia and pro-Israeli groups was still being driven by Chinese scholars themselves – for a variety of professional, academic, and monetary reasons.

Indeed. The Chinese recognized that they and the Jews share a common existential trait – an undying hatred of Whites and of the West. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” – and Jews and East Asians are becoming fast friends based upon their hatred of the White Man.

Xu Xin – the head of the Nanjing Judaic Studies Institute – is an illustrative example of this dynamic. Since the late 1980s, Xu Xin has actively courted significant funding from the American Jewish community to back his many projects concentrated in Nanjing University, which range from the Institute of Jewish Studies (later renamed in 2006 the Diane and Guilford Glazer Institute of Jewish Studies), a Judaica library to multiple workshops held for Chinese scholars and students interested in Judaism and Israel…The convergence of these three trends produced the current advocacy phenomenon that has emerged in China from the mid-2000s and onwards…

While the Yellow Fist of Hatred angrily slaps away the White Hand of Friendship, the same Yellow Fist opens in welcome to the sallow and hairy Jewish Hand of Globalist Dominance.

Daniel S Is Right About This

The Sen problem.
I’ve had my disagreements with Daniel S, but I heartily endorse this post.
I have in the past analyzed the Sen-Vallone connections and I agree that these are most likely the same person (*).  The divisive and anti-White antics of Sen-Vallone, including the bizarre hostility toward Poles (coupled to a deep concern for the well-being of South Asian shopkeepers infesting Britain), has also been discussed here.
Daniel is a bit too charitable to TOO and its embrace of Sen. Poor judge of character is a bit too mild.  Even after the Sen-Vallone situation had been dissected on a variety of sites (including this one), TOO still gave Sen a forum. Despite being aware of the potential problems, they keep on pushing.
At best, that’s an indication of the failings of affirmative action, pushing toward positions of leadership individuals unsuited for that role.  At worst, well…
This is all also part of the Sallis-HBD extension of O’Sullivan’s Law.  Indeed, any “rightist” entity that is not expressly concerned with genetic kinship and civilizational cultural ties – more specifically, any such entity that contaminates itself with the anti-White hate cult of HBD – will inevitably drift away from pro-White politics and toward a more aracial, civic nationalist stance and will, also inevitably, become easy prey for questionable figures with vague ancestries and even vaguer political agendas.
*Recently listening to certain interviews at Counter-Currents and Radix podcasts, interviews of ostensibly “different” people, my suspicions of the superimposed identity of another “pair” (sic) of activists have been confirmed.  But that’s a story for another day.

The D and D Boys Are At It Again

Durocher and Daniel S (imitating Derbyshire).

Another pathetic and rambling bit of try-hard nonsense from Durocher the Untermenschen, scurrying around a topic, never coming to any definitive conclusions, promoting his own writings, including his imbecilic musinderstandings of population genetics. Note also how he tries to defend Hitler at Counter-Currents, while at The Occidental Observer these days it is Jews, Jews, Jews. 
Daniel S at Majority Rights has a new post that reaches new heights in the HBD NAMs meme, outdoing the likes of Derbyshire.  It includes this comment:

But yes, for one thing, in terms of EGI, Africans and Denisovans are arguably among the worst Europeans can mix with. Moreover, if you take my example as I actually meant it, not strictly about Paupuans but about blacks, plenty of mixing does occur – quite dangerous and destructive.

Yeah, plenty of mixing occurs with East Asians – quite dangerous and destructive. As I’ve always said, Majority Rights has always had a complete misunderstanding – or in some cases intentional misuse – of the EGI concept (no wonder certain academics avoid them). Fact is, East Asians are almost as genetically distant from Europeans as are Negroes and Papuans. The NECs that MR castigates are much, much, more genetically closer to Europeans than are East Asians. As far as net EGI goes – which takes into account the on-the-ground behaviors of groups that affect EGI – we can note significant East Asian immigration to the Anglosphere, significant interbreeding with Whites, and the seething Yellow Peril hatred of nations like China for the West. And, unlike Negroes and Papuans, the Yellow Peril constitutes a real and long-tern military and economic threat to the West.

Once again, my suspicions are aroused: that East Asians see their women as a weapon of war to be used against European Man (and I use the male sex there intentionally), to influence Whites to take pro-Asian attitudes against the interests of their own people. And before love-struck White Knights, defending Yellows, accuse this blog of “sucking Jewish cock” as part of a conspiracy to derail the budding White-Yellow alliance (an alliance that seems well consummated by Derbyshire’s “measured groveling” to his wife), I can point out that any cursory reading of this blog – and my work in its entirety – makes clear that I’m no friend of the Jews. Amazingly enough, it is possible to be against both Jews and East Asians at the same time.
I cannot consider MR a pro-White site. The “majority” they are concerned with is apparently East Asian and not European. The curtain descends there, leaving GW, Daniel S, and Kumiko to gibber among themselves.

At the Intersection of Mainstreaming and HBD

Madness, it’s folly and madness.

At Amren, a “White Advocate” commentator writes:

My understanding is that many AmRen supporters hold that both Jews and North Asians are more intelligent that gentile Whites. While the term Jewish supremacist won’t work for a whole boatload of reasons, let’s experiment with North Asian (or Oriental) supremacist. Imagine inviting the press to a North Asian Supremacy conference only to have them stumble in to a room full of white guys.

Paging John Derbyshire!  It’s time for some “measured groveling” to our Asiatic masters!  If I wrote the above quote as a parody, some would think that I was going too far; unfortunately, that’s a real comment and no parody. And it’s reasonably consistent; after all:

He claims to be a “yellow supremacist” because he has theorized that Asian people are the most advanced humans (in evolutionary terms), followed by white people and those of African descent.

And it’s not just that site.  A more radically WN site has recently been commandeered by an aggressively domineering East Asian female, who has got the henpecked White males there agreeing to a “Euro-Asian alliance” so as to “inflict pain on Russians” (you know, the most populous ethnic group in Europe) and to colonize the West with Asians so that Western borders can be defended by Chinese girls with guns.  Again, that’s not a parody of their position, it’s the actual position itself.

People wondering why I am so adamantly opposed to HBD can perhaps begun to discern the direction that HBD/race-realism inevitably leads us: worship of Asians, a “movement” based on “Oriental supremacism” with subaltern Whites groveling before the more “evolutionarily advanced” Asiatics.  In some cases, Whites are to grovel before Jews as well; in other cases, “movement” fears of “Jewish infiltration” never for some reason extend to the danger of infiltration by yellow and brown Asians.

Recently, the “movement” – including some of the pro-Asian sites mentioned above – has been harshly critiquing Roosh and the PUA stupidity.  While that criticism has been richly deserved, a question that goes unanswered is: why is being race cucked by a Chinaman any better than by a Persian?

And all talk about “alliances” is doubly ludicrous.  First, because we have all sorts of grand alliances being proposed by small groups of powerless bloggers, the sort of “fascist delusion” mocked by the likes of Roger Griffin (*).  Second, because it should be obvious that alliances should never be formed from a position of weakness.  In the mid-late 1990s, there was much chatter among the “movement” about forming “alliances” with Black nationalists.  To which more sane people queried: and what do we offer them?  Negroes under Farrakhan had just marched en masse onto the nation’s capital, while White neckbeards have continuously proved unable to march down a side street without being out-numbered by crowds of hostile protesters.  Why should anyone form an “alliance” with the losing side (Whites)?  Such an “alliance” would be nothing more or less than the terms of surrender by Whites, negotiating from a position of perfect weakness.

But, then, the “movement” always knows better.  With such fine merit-based leadership, who could ever doubt their wisdom?

*Nothing wrong with proposing ideas.  But when it “jumps the shark” into grandiose designs complete with multiple maps and empty bombastic rhetoric then we have moved from reasonable advocacy to fever-dream delusion.