Category: Derbyshire

SLC News, 3/13/18

More “movement” stupidity.

This utter crap demonstrates once again why Jef Costello ranks among the worst, most juvenile, and relentlessly asinine, writers on the Right.  Typical of his ilk, he projects his own feelings (not “thoughts” but womanly “feelings”) on everyone else, ignoring known examples of those who disagree.

But I’ve never met anyone…

That’s an example of Costello’s mendacity.  What does he mean by “met?”  If he literally means actually meeting people in person, then that statement may well be correct, but meaningless – how many activists has Costello actually met, and how many of those has he met at Amren conferences or “extreme vetted” Counter-Currents meetings, at which virtually everyone (with the exception of Hermansson and Lewis) would be pro-Taylor?

If we take a broader view of “met” to include “meeting” online then the statement is obviously false.

For example, read this.

And this.

Please note: I am NOT saying I agree with those harsh assessments, but am merely pointing out that they exist.  Yes, Mr. Costello likely never met these people, including Linder, face-to-face, but how can he pretend he doesn’t know that these attitudes exist?  Those comments are not merely disagreements about strategy, they are obviously about character and personality as well.

By the way, several years ago when Greg Johnson write how “disgusting” it is that people in the “movement” support Derbyshire, I ask, who is included in that?  Can you think of a prominent pro-White activist who was among the first to embrace Derbyshire, and invite him to be a featured speaker at conferences?  Maybe Costello can answer that after he’s finished serving breakfast to Mudshark Annie (and perhaps Dinesh as well).

The articles, by Jared and others, are of the highest intellectual caliber, and are uniformly “fact based”:

Yeah, sure they are.

Munro’s anecdotal “hit piece” on Romanians was real “intellectual” and “fact based” and all, just as was the pro-Jewish modifications to the Hornbeck article in MacDonald, as were the ramblings of “Hippocrates,” and the constant promotion of the outrageous pseudoscience of the doddering old charlatan Lynn.

And on another matter read this. Note: “cuck-island-upate” (may be corrected by VDARE later on).

Not sure what an “upate” is, but, as regards the actual story, well, as I said as a riposte to Roissy, some of my best friends are cuck naggers.


Odds and Ends, 3/3/18

Der Movement. In all cases, emphasis added.

Trump: Just take their guns.


Mr. Magoo or Howdy Doody?

Remember Roissy and his “Sessions as Attorney General alone justifies the Trump Presidency!”  The train wreck that is the Donald Cuck Presidency is a gift that keeps on giving.

Derb is smarter than Roissy:

After watching this last show, however, I have to admit, despair is getting hard to fend off. Trump was simply terrible. As in the January meeting, he agreed enthusiastically with the last person who spoke, even when that person had said the opposite thing to what the previous person had said. I found myself thinking: Does Trump actually understand words and meanings? This is the Great Negotiator?

Meanwhile, Roissy is busy telling us how much he “loves Trump” (no kidding) – onanism alert!  After all, hiring “hot babes” and making middle school-level comments about boys having sex with female teachers is all we want or need in a President.

More Derb:

I liked the clip anyway, mainly for the delectable lisp of the female reporter, Yukari Kondo. “Finding a company to herrp them re-rocate is a charrenge …” Should Ms Kondo visit New York any time, I’d be glad to buy her lunch just for the pleasure of hearing her talk.

Derb is infatuated with (some aspect of) an Asian female?  Say it ain’t so!

The Alt Righters are back!

Get ready for comments about how (S.) Italians are Negroid mongrels!

Fisking Derbyshire, 2/19/18

A brief fisking.

So why was opium smoking so devastating among China’s poor? Adulteration, says Midler. In the extreme, a cheap variety named Hankow Cake contained no opium at all, only sesame seeds.  Midler:

Historians are so hell-bent on blaming the West for everything that went wrong with China in the nineteenth century that they have no room for an investigation into the serious possibility that the nation may have actually poisoned itself.

I would like to see some rigorous historical research on that, but it’s not implausible, and fits very well with the tiresome Chinese bellyaching about the wrongs done to them by foreigners.

How does it differ from Chinese fraud and mendacity today?

Chinese people acknowledge that an individual fellow-countryman may be wicked, but China as a nation can do no wrong.

National self-esteem is of course not an exclusively Chinese phenomenon. We Americans—well, some of us—treasure our “exceptionalism.” Chinese propagandists take it to the extreme, though.

Midler calls it “collective narcissism”  and quotes Lucian Pye, writing fifty years ago:

Nothing can be wrong with the Chinese spirit and their inward identity. All problems must lie outside and therefore be the work of “foreigners.”

But, of course.

Leszek Kolakowski in Main Currents of Marxism described Mao Tse-tung Thought as “a naïve repetition of a few commonplaces of Leninist-Stalinist Marxism.” He allows, however, that Mao was “one of the greatest, if not the very greatest, manipulator of large masses of human beings in the twentieth century.”

So Maoism was a cheap Chinese knock-off of Marxism-Leninism.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal…what else is new for the race of human photocopiers?

Why are so many of us so forgivingly fond of this exasperating, paradoxical, unstable place?  

Pathetic White nerds have Yellow Fever, that’s why.  The “awkward squad” wants to get laid.

Paul Midler quotes from the answer given by Progressive sociologist Edward Alsworth Ross in 1911.

Chinese are extremely likable and those who have known them longest like them best. Almost invariably those who harshly disparage them are people who are coarse or narrow or bigoted. They are not a sour or sullen folk. Smile at them and back comes a look that puts you on a footing of mutual understanding. Their lively sense of humor is a bond that unites them to the foreigner.

Substitute “Chinese” with “Negroes” and Derbyshire would rightly mock this quote, rife as it is with smug moral posturing: all you Chinese haters simply don’t know them.  Excuse my language, but…bullshit.

Ross (1866-1951) is an odd person for Midler to quote in this context.  He would himself be denounced as the worst kind of bigot today. He was a race realist, nativist, and eugenicist who strongly objected to race mixing—so strongly, he was fired from his professorship at Stanford in 1900 for his views.

In 1900!  Well, anyway, what’s the surprise?  A Nordicist HBD type who liked East Asians. Who would have ever guessed?

Much as he liked the Chinese, Ross did not want them settling in the U.S.A. This is a perfectly tenable position, although intolerably shocking to present-day orthodoxies.

Yes, it’s tenable.  Can the Derbyshire family please leave then?

Ross got the likability right, though, and “those who have known them longest like them best.” (Rodney Gilbert may have been an exception.)

Right…the usual SJW song and dance about how “only Whites who don’t know Coloreds are the ones who are bigoted against them.” Derbyshire himself would scoff at that regarding Blacks, why can’t we similarly scoff about Yellows?  I know Chinese very well.  I don’t like them.

And to the further collective credit of the Chinese must be added this: Unlike the nations of the West today, they have no intention of opening up the borders of their nation to tens of millions of foreigners.  Stupidity on that scale is peculiarly Western.

Yes, but having Jews around poisoning the well of sociopolitical discourse does not help.

What’s wrong with us?

We let former illegal alien Dreamer Derbyshire stay in America, bringing in his alien wife and producing mixed-race children.

Here’s the solution to the whole problem.  People who don’t like China and the Chinese should not live in China (likewise, Munro should get the hell out of Romania).  But, please, can we remove all people who posses Chinese descent – part or full – and those married to them from America?

Thank you.

Movement Roundup: Dolt Right, Yellow Fever, and Naivete

Alt Right, the Derb, and Jeronimus

Today’s regularly scheduled critique of the Alt Right will be postponed, and possibly will be significantly modified for future presentation, due to uncertainty about the ongoing chaos within the Alt Right.  It seems that – for now – has password-protected access and is no longer open to the general public.  Whether that is just a temporary situation, a technical glitch, or a more long-term change in their approach – who knows?  We’ll see.  And then “The Movement Critic,” in his own inimitable style, posts a continuous stream of material on Alt Right bigwigs; even if only a small fraction of that is accurate, it is troubling and indicative of a chaotic mess.

We’ll have to keep a close eye on these developments, and the potential impact on Der Movement, Inc. and on White racial nationalism in general.

At this point, I see no reason to change my “this too shall pass” prediction about the Alt Right: sooner or later it will turn out to be another “movement” passing fad, and we’ll look back (as usual) at all the wasted time, effort, and money and wonder what happened.

For me, it is getting closer and closer to 25 years – a quarter-century – of putting up with “movement” nonsense, and the most frustrating thing is seeing the same mistakes being made over and over again.  I’ve already talked about the endless Man on White Horse Syndrome, but the latest fiascos are something different: the “movement” propensity to eagerly grasp onto any follower, any self-proclaimed savior, any person who professes their “willingness to help” or their interest in any way, without the slightest degree of skepticism, prudence, alertness, or discretion on the part of the “movement” whatsoever.  Regardless of the actual outcome of the Kline/Mosely military combat revelations, the main point I get from that is (from the NY Times article):

He rose from a self-described “anonymous Twitter troll” to head of one of the largest groups in the so-called alt-right.

There you go.  A rapid rise indeed.  Some “extreme vetting” no doubt.  Anyone see a pattern in any of these recent events?  Kline/Mosely.  The Jorjani fiasco.  The comedy of Hermansson and the other recent infiltrations. It’s the same old story.  Impatience, immaturity, a lack of judgment, a lack of depth, and zero accountability.

Forget about “extreme vetting” – there is no vetting at all.  There’s no discretion, no prudence, when it comes to personnel. No screening – real screening.  No conception that a person has to “pay their dues” over time, to invest years of activism, to be known by established activists, to “make their bones” – even if merely by consistent and useful online work – before being trusted with any sort of position or authority.  No, to Der Movement, if you are ostensibly White, can fog a mirror held up to your nose, and profess allegiance to “the cause” – you’re in, handed the “keys to the kingdom” after an “apprenticeship” of weeks (or, if you’re Swedish, days…or maybe hours).  Of course, it’s true that a determined infiltrator can become a mole and put years of work in and climb in the “movement” – one has to be on guard even then.  But, by analogy, just because a highly-skilled professional cat burglar can circumvent the sophistical security you have to protect your valuables is no excuse to shrug, give up, and just leave your front door wide open.  It’s an ongoing “Red Queen” scenario of mutual completion and adaption on both sides; if one side just cedes the fight then they lose every time.  And it’s not just infiltrators, keeping up standards weeds out well-meaning but incompetent individuals or individuals who are sincere but of poor character, chronic liars who cannot be trusted.  Also, people who have invested years into serious activism, not merely lulzing or Nutzi acting out, and who prove a sound theoretical, ideological, and moral understanding of the situation – these are less likely to drop out or turn traitor.

And remember this when the Millennial Alt Righters decry the “extremism” of “Boomer” “White Nationalism 1.0”:

Speaking previously on a far-right podcast, Mr Kline identified himself as a HR person who fires “n****** and sp*** all day. Before that I was in the army and I got to kill Muslims for fun. I’m not sure which one was better, watching n****** and sp*** cry they can’t feed their little mud children or watching Muslims’ brains sprayed on the wall. Honestly both probably suck compared to listening to a k*** scream…”

The Alt Right is the enemy of White racial nationalism.  Better a hundred William Pierces than any of these crude, vulgar, lulzing, drunken jackasses.  That’s why I put The Movement Critic on my blog list, at least for now.  Not that I agree with most or all that is there (although most of it is highly amusing), but Der Movement needs a good disinfectant, and the more stringent, the better.

No doubt Derbyshire finds it ‘thrilling.”  Just his “cup of tea: so to speak, no?

Then we have Strom’s Jeronimus interviews.

Part I.

Part II.

Interesting premise and the overall strategy can be one approach, of several, to pursue, but there are some basic problems.

This Jeronimus says he in his “late 40s” but seems to not have learned too much. Contrast this to Strom in his early 60s, who exhibits a bit more prudence.  With the idea of having White families renting out apartment space in cities, Strom brings up the obvious problem of “fair housing” laws and that the project “will need a good lawyer.” That’s realistic and prudent, and anticipates problems and contingencies.  Jeronimus, on the other hand, blows off these concerns, blithely assuring us that “no one will bother you” as long as you are “not LARPING” (why must a Generation Xer use such Millennial terms?).  I tend to agree with Strom’s skepticism.  You’ll need to very carefully “fly under the radar” and to the extent the strategy is successful, the greater the chance of the System understanding what is going on and attempting to sabotage it.  The fact that some scattered Nutzis here and there are presently unmolested, while doing something vaguely similar, in one sense proves my point, as the System will target the more successful and, hence, dangerous manifestations of this.  Perhaps by not “LARPING” and being more serious that would make the project more of a target?

That’s not say: “don’t so it.”  DO do it.  But don’t go in half-assed, assuming everything will work out, and not having contingency plans for problems.  Don’t underestimate the enemy and don’t underestimate their mendacity and persistence in preventing White organization. Of course you’ll need legal representation and a whole host of other things that this Jeronimus apparently has not considered (no worries though – all those imaginary billionaire sugar daddies will find it all).  I for one cannot really trust the judgment of anyone who would so casually dismiss Strom’s caution.  And why publicize the project at such an early date, to increase the probability of being targeted?

Related to that, it was Strom who brought up the obvious point of “should we be talking about this publicly?” (But they continued to do so and this has been put up on the website).  “The revolution will not be televised” – but  it sure will be podcasted about in advance, I guess.

The same “movement” ineptness, lack of judgment, absence of prudent contingency planning, etc.  Everything is half-assed, assumed, poorly planned.

And the idea that any of the current crop of White Billionaires will fund anything pro-White is ludicrously naïve.  If these billionaires were so inclined, there’s a lot they could have done already to help pro-White causes.

And: Allen Dulles killed JFK?  Evidence?

There’s that old saying that “military intelligence” is an oxymoron.

And so it goes…

Behold the Female: What’s the Difference?

It’s all one.

Sex workers.  And now please tell me how that is different from ordinary female behavior – exchanging sexual favors in return for “goodies” from men (including beta male commitment).

If you think this is stated just for the misogynistic shock value, think again.  Consider: what is meant by a “trophy wife?”  A “Mrs Degree?”  A woman “looking for a good provider?”  The meaning of the fact that on dates typically men are expected to pay for everything, plan for everything.  In each case, what is milady providing in exchange for male resources?  Answer: sex or at least the promise of sex. It is essentially legalized prostitution.  The honorable behavior for women is motherhood (and, later, grandmotherhood) – family formation and nurturing.  The contribution to genetic continuity is worthwhile, but the typical cunning female exploitation of male sexual weakness is nothing more or less than glorified whoredom.

By the way, fresh from tearful courtroom speeches and #MeToo Activism, the female always returns to her roots: trade sexuality for attention and resources.  You Go Girl!  A rotifer has mores self-awareness than a typical woman.

Even a morally deficient cognitive weakling like Derbyshire notices the obvious:

My question: Nassar was doing the stuff he was doing for twenty-five years. How’d he get away with it for so long?
Part of the answer, I’m sure, is the same as the answer to the same question in the matter of show business sexual harassment. In both cases there was a thing that the harassees wanted very, very badly —so badly that they, or in the case of younger victims, more likely their parents—might have considered that submitting to harassment or molestation was a price worth paying for that thing.
In the showbiz cases the thing wanted was a movie part; in Nassar’s case, a shot at competing in the Olympics.
I don’t say that’s the whole story, and I certainly wouldn’t say that all the victims took that cynical view. Twenty-five years of silence needs explaining, though. I’ve no doubt that’s part of the explanation.

The media likes to concentrate on the isolated cases when complaints were made and were ignored, while blithely not mentioning the fact that many of the victims said nothing at the time, and are now being hailed as Tankgrrl Heroines for marching into court (after being emotionally soothed by a Labrador retriever wearing a tie) and browbeating the NEC pervert (or, simply, and non-redundantly, the NEC). Consider that powerful male celebrities are suffering auto da fe if accused of looking at a woman the wrong way back in the Ice Age.  So, if the entire woman’s Olympic gymnastics team, and their parents, had complained, nothing would have been done?  If all of “America’s darlings” had come forward publicly, together, nothing would have been done?  Yeah, sure.  If you believe that, I also have a bridge to sell you, spanning Manhattan to Brooklyn.

No, just like all the women who went to visit HuWhite Harvey, despite “it was known all over Hollywood what was going on”, and like all the women going to the office of Levantine Lauer (and his door-locking desk button) despite his own reputation, sometimes Tankgrrl ambition gets in the way of right thinking, eh ladies?  Or like those actresses who publicly decry being “objectified” and then post scantily-clad pictures of themselves on social media for all the world to see – a complete lack of self-awareness and adult-level agency.

A not-so-secret secret revealed to the women reading this blog: likely, most of the men you know and interact with on a regular basis have a well-disguised contempt for your sex, and it is justified.  When you act like children but demand to be treated as more-than-equals, supported by a hysterical SJW System, the contempt is well-earned.

The Honeypot Approach

The new Yellow Peril: a racial-psychosexual peril.

I have repeatedly warned that Asians will pimp out their women to White males, so as to influence the sociopolitical behavior of those males to Asian advantage.  In the Clash of Civilizations. Asians weaponized their women to leverage White male Yellow Fever Fetishism (*) to subvert the West from within.  And why not particularly subvert the more nationalist bastions of Western resistance? If even “fascists” and “racists” are obsessed with their Asian honeypots, the whole point of a White Western dissident movement becomes meaningless, as “White activism” becomes hijacked by cunning yellows just so low grade beta and omega White males can get laid with what passes for women from the Orient.

In some cases, this Honeypot Approach is an organized, intentional, top-down strategy to undermine the White West; however, in many cases it is a self-directed, unorganized, bottom-up phenomenon – the instinctive strategy of an invasive organism to evade the immune response of the host, and to subvert the host’s ecology so as to better serve the invader (just like what the Jews do, also both in directed ad undirected fashions, although the Jews do it differently, and typically do not use their women, for obvious reasons). So, we cannot merely view this as all being state-sponsored honeypot operations (no doubt the strawman representation of my views that will be propagated by the HBDers and other race mixers – “look at that paranoid Sallis, he’s nuts; my wife is not a Chinese agent”), but also, to a large extent, as an innate and instinctive tendency of the group, sometimes occurring with no overt direction at all, the (in some cases, subconscious?) realization that the best way to subvert the host, to make way for the invader, is for the invading women to seduce, distract, and subvert host males.  Later, when the host is sufficiently weakened, and immune responses against the invader repressed, invading males can begin to have access to host females (and we see increasing numbers of Asian male-White female couplings, but these are still less numerous than the reverse; first because the White West has not yet been fully subverted by the Yellow East, and, second, because of racial differences in perceived masculinity and femininity, which make White females gravitate to the Negro when these females are inclined to race-mix).

So, we have Chinese “nationalist maidens” and Japanese “shady ladies” infiltrating White nationalism, leading weak sweaty White males to onanistically declare that “Asians can make great allies” and that we need “Chinatowns” in White ethnostates, and that Chinese girls with guns will be “the border guards of the West.”  One needs not merely theoretically speculate about the Honeypot Approach; it has actually occurred and it is currently occurring.

And we can thank the Type I activists for this.

Favorite East Asian export:
Type I: women
Type II: Gigantor
Type I: science
Type II: pseudoscience
Type I: Land of the Gods
Type II: Yellow Peril

Finally, look at this absurd squid ink from precisely the sort of White male who has been racially compromised by his “preferences.”

Lim’s piece is indeed important, and the reason should be obvious to anyone who’s not an Asian fetishist child porn apologist.  It’s not a question of whether the incidence of White male-Asian female relationships is lower among “race purist” Alt Righters compared to the general White male population.  The question, Derbyshire, is why “WN “race purists” are involved in any inter-racial relationships and/or for those who no longer partake, why they feel it necessary to justify and defend their bizarre past preferences (or let’s call it as it is – fetishes).  You see, my dear Derb, the incidence of race-mixing among “race purists” should be ZERO, and any incidence greater than ZERO is a legitimate topic for critical analysis.

*Oh, it’s just a “preference,” right, Derb?  So, there’s also no such thing as a “foot fetishist” – it’s just a “foot preferencist.”  What a buffoon this Derbyshire is.

The Alt Yellow

Exposing the racial sexual fetishism underlying “movement” and HBD politics.

Sallis right again…and, no, I don’t get tired of writing that.

Readers of this blog are aware that I have been very critical of the pro-Asian precincts of the “movement.”

Thus I have continuously asserted:

1. Certain precincts of Der Movement – including but not limited to Alt Wrong HBD/race realists, certain Alt Righters, Type I activists, some Nutzis, and the Silk Roaders – are pro-Asian (mostly East Asian), are obsessed with Asians (particularly Asian females), and value Asians over either all Whites or over some subset of Whites (White ethnics).  Some actually call themselves “yellow supremacists.”

2. Pro-Asian “White racial activists” tend to be derived from ethnic groups associated with “high trust hunter gatherer” ancestry.

3. As suggested above, these tend to be people who are Type I activists ideologically, Type I activists as regards character (the Beavis-and-Butthead brigade) or the most pure Type I activist that combines both ideological and character components.  In fact, I would like to make an important modification of my typology scheme here.  Only people who are Type II in both ideology and character should be classified as Type II activists.  Everyone else are Type I.  Even though I believe ideology trumps character, the “taint” of Type I character is so strong that an activist with a Type II ideology and a Type I character is effectively, functionally, Type I.  

4. As suggested above, there is an underlying Yellow Fever sexual fetishism here; the pro-Asian attitudes are tied to a history of sexual interest in East Asian females.

5. Indeed, many of these types have a documented history of dating and/or marrying East Asian females.

How do the facts square with Sallistrian assertion?

Read this.  Emphasis added:

The white supremacists on the far right have “yellow fever” — an Asian woman fetish. It’s a confusing mix.

Andrew Anglin, the founder of the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer, once posted a video of himself with a Filipina he called “my jailbait girlfriend,” the young couple flirting as they sauntered through a megamall in the Philippines. Richard Spencer, a white nationalist, has dated a series of Asian-American women, according to one of his ex-girlfriends. (Mr. Spencer insists that it was before he embraced white nationalism.)

The right-wing agitator Mike Cernovich, the writer John Derbyshire and an alt-right figure named Kyle Chapman (so notorious for swinging a lead-filled stick at Trump opponents at a protest in Berkeley, Calif., that he is now a meme) are all married to women of Asian descent. As a commenter wrote on an alt-right forum, “exclusively” dating Asian women is practically a “white-nationalist rite of passage.”

Saint Adolf:

“I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves,” Adolf Hitler said in 1945. “They belong to ancient civilizations, and I admit freely that their past history is superior to our own.”

Of course, Slavs are “subhuman” but Chinese and Japanese are ever-so-superior.  Hitler: Type I Nutzi.

Then we have that “high trust hunter gatherer” Charles Murray (emphasis added):

Murray left for the Peace Corps in Thailand in 1965, staying abroad for a formative six years.] At the beginning of this period, the young Murray kindled a romance with his Thai Buddhist language instructor (in Hawaii), Suchart Dej-Udom, the daughter of a wealthy Thai businessman, who was “born with one hand and a mind sharp enough to outscore the rest of the country on the college entrance exam.” Murray subsequently proposed by mail from Thailand, and their marriage began the following year, a move that Murray now considers youthful rebellion. “I’m getting married to a one-handed Thai Buddhist,” he said. “This was not the daughter-in-law that would have normally presented itself to an Iowa couple.”
Murray credits his time in the Peace Corps in Thailand with his lifelong interest in Asia. “There are aspects of Asian culture as it is lived that I still prefer to Western culture, 30 years after I last lived in Thailand,” says Murray. “Two of my children are half-Asian. Apart from those personal aspects, I have always thought that the Chinese and Japanese civilizations had elements that represented the apex of human accomplishment in certain domains.

Of course, Murray’s own book on “human accomplishment” – despite his attempt to “cook the books” – tells a different story, does it not?  The apex of human accomplishment in almost all domains is a bit further west than China and Japan, no?

And…”youthful rebellion?”  Yeah, it produced two mixed-race children and a pro-Asian attitude “30 years after.” Murray: the Type I political scientist.  “Youthful rebellion”  – with consequences that last a lifetime.  How about some responsibility and accountability, Chuck? What a turd.

And will you all deny that HBD is a pro-Asian (and pro-Jewish) political movement in large part fueled by Yellow Fever enthusiasts (Murray, Derbyshire, Brand) and their associates (Sailer – who once claimed to be part-Jewish, the penis sized-obsessed Rushton, and pseudoscientist joke Lynn, never mind the “I come from an inbred group” HBD Chick and the triracial and part-Asian mongrel Jayman).

By the way, I’ve personally known quite a few White males (not men), all in STEM, married to Orientals.  Not a single one is “normal;” they are all – ALL – what Derbyshire self-labels as “awkward squad.”  All of them are socially awkward weaklings whose wives “wear the pants” in the family.  Yes, yes, I know: anecdotal evidence.  But how much do you want to bet that a quantitative psychometric study will demonstrate clear personality differences between Yellow Fever race-mixers and the rest of us?

Also read this, emphasis added:

But Spencer’s evolution into a hardcore ethno-nationalist was perhaps not as seamless as he makes it seem. In late 2007, he dated a woman who is Asian American. The two met when she was working for Ron Paul’s presidential campaign.

“I am not the only Asian girl he has dated,” says Spencer’s ex, who spoke to me on the condition that her name not be disclosed. She said she’d initially been turned off by his talk of race-based behavioral differences, but she eventually softened to the idea. They dated for four months, including a trip she took with him to Texas to attend his high school reunion. She says she eventually broke up with him, but not because he was too politically radical. “We all have inconsistencies,” she said. “Especially with love. How can you control your heart?”

I asked Spencer about his Asian ex as he was digging into a bowl of Thai noodles at an eclectic restaurant in the quaint downtown of Whitefish. He seemed shocked that I’d brought it up, and peppered me with questions about how I’d found out. “I would rather you didn’t write about that,” he said, adding later: “You are probably going to nail me with this…I think some people in the movement would probably find that terrible.” He confirmed that she was not the only Asian woman he’d been with, but he said the relationships predated his evolution into a white nationalist.

Though Spencer now opposes interracial relationships, white nationalists have long looked east for inspiration—Hitler regarded Chinese and Japanese history as “superior to our own.” Jared Taylor and William Johnson, the leader of the white nationalist American Freedom Party, both speak fluent Japanese. “There is something about the Asian girls,” Spencer said. “They are cute. They are smart. They have a kind of thing going on. If I am looking at my own life objectively, it really doesn’t surprise me that much.”

Let me explain the problem, what is “terrible.” The real problem here is not that Spencer dated some Asians before he became a WN.  After all, he dated them, not married them, and he did not procreate with them. OK, fine. But please Richard, be a man, admit your error. You would get more respect from the “movement” if you would just say “look, I was young, I was not a WN, I used poor judgment, and I made some mistakes.  It was wrong, I regret it, and it certainly will never happen again.”  Instead, we get justifications: “There is something about the Asian girls,” Spencer said. “They are cute. They are smart. They have a kind of thing going on. If I am looking at my own life objectively, it really doesn’t surprise me that much.”

So…what?  If some female mudshark makes similar excuses for dating Tyrone Carjacker, should we just blithely accept that as well?  Yes, Negroes are worse than Asians, and, yes, female miscegenation can be considered worse since females are the bottleneck for reproduction.  But, as regards principle, it’s the same thing.  ADMIT YOUR MISTAKE.  DO NOT ATTEMPT TO JUSTIFY IT.  Do you guys really need to be told that?

I mean, if Spencer “now opposes interracial relationships,” then obviously he has to consider those past relationships of his a mistake.  Therefore, it’s obvious that one must take responsibility for it.  But, alas, responsibility and accountability is not what the “movement” is about now, is it? And the Asian claims she broke up with him, not the other way around.  Accountability?

These are your “leaders” and heroes, by the way.  Good luck with a “pro-White” “movement” that values Yellow over White, and that consists of activists who think dating Orientals is a “rite of passage.”

Type I activists have dominated American racial nationalism and has led it down into the toilet.  Keep on supporting them though, that’ll do wonders to “advance the cause.”