I’ve been paying close attention to various interviews and announcements from health experts (Dutton swoons about ”credentialism” – let’s hear what the theology folks have to say about viral transmission). The situation is dire. The China Plague is spreading, the modes of transmission now include feces-lack-of-hand-washing-contamination as well as person-to-person via air, there’s complete skepticism about containment outside China, the UK is having big problems with this, and the SJW System has it “in” for Whites.
All we hear from the System/SJWs is that travel restrictions are “racist” and “discriminatory.” They WANT the disease to spread in the USA. Reading between the lines what we can observe is gross disappointment among the SJWs that there aren’t more Whites infected and dying. Why should only Asiatics suffer? Share and share alike! True egalitarianism is achieved when the White Privilege of not being infected and dying ends, and the White devils start suffering like everyone else.
Meanwhile, there is news (if you believe the sources) that “re-infection” can occur with deadly consequences. That is, a person is or has been already infected, is fighting it or has recovered, has antibodies, gets exposed again, and that secondary exposure over-stimulates the immune system, with the resulting “cytokine storm” killing the patient. Whether or not this turns out to be reality, the established facts about the China Plague are bad enough.
True enough, some patients only have very mild symptoms. So? Even with “Captain Trips” there were some few who were immune. Oh, that’s fiction, you may say. However, it reflects reality. A plague does not have to kill, or even sicken, everyone to be absolutely devastating. Just ask those Europeans who survived The Yellow Death (called by System liars The Black Death).
More to the point is that even IF, starting today, the whole thing fizzles out, it has already had significant sociopolitical consequences in China and economic consequences that will have ripples throughout the world in 2020. But it is not fizzling out starting today, is it?
This is a Somethingburger, my friends, not a Nothingburger (as the retarded “movement” would have you believe).
Once again: Der Movement – wrong, wrong, they’re always, ALWAYS wrong.
This situation will, if nothing else, prove the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of Der Movement, and even more so of its HBD race realist Yellow Supremacist faction.
As stated here before, you know damn well that if it were Black Africans – or even lower on the HBD hierarchy, S. Italians – responsible for this disaster, the “movement” would be screaming about it night and day, and the spontaneous ejaculations from HBD micropenes would rival Niagara Falls in volume and intensity. But China? Move on, move on, there’s nothing to see here.
The race war of Yellow against White. China is waging chemical and biological warfare against the White race. HBDers support China. HBDers are genocidal race traitors.
Another human murdered by the monsters. HBD supports the monsters. HBD is a criminal conspiracy.
Two serious coronavirus-related Amren questions:
1. Is Derbyshire attending the 2020 Amren conference?
2. If so, does that constitute a health risk for the other attendees?
Read this account of a typical effete White.
What’s interesting is that the name under the title read:
While at the end it said:
Spencer J. Quinn is a frequent contributor to Counter-Currents and the author of the novel White Like You.
And then the other name was fairy soon after changed to Quinn. The other name is also a Counter-Currents contributor. Does this mean that the same people contribute Counter-Currents articles under different names – artificially inflating the “diversity of opinion” at that site? Or was it just an error like previously confusing Hampton and Johnson (unless they really are one and the same, which I am not claiming [although anything is possible])?
You know, the two-for-one deal is not impossible. I’m not saying that’s the case here – as I said the possibility of an error through incompetence is always possible when you’re dealing with these guys. But it’s not impossible.
*I’m not going to put the name here, since the fact that it was quickly changed means that either the author does not want to be associated with that essay by name or it was another example of affirmative action incompetence (or both). I don’t reveal things that are private and not already overtly public; that’s not what EGI Notes is about.
Either possibility – multiple personas as really one person or merely repeated episodes of website formatting incompetence – does not reflect well on Counter-Currents. Then again, Counter-Currents does not reflect well on Counter-Currents, so what else can we expect?
Dutton’s critique of Rushton never happened, right?
Speaking of which, see this. I’ll say this for Dutton – he delegitimizes HBD more than any of my own criticisms have so far achieved. Besides behaving like a juvenile jackass on podcasts, he engages in the HBD version of “purity spiraling” – attacking other HBD figures, first Rushton (but, strangely enough, in this review, Rushton’s material is now considered sound) and now Murray. Dutton then promotes the works of pseudoscientists like “Tricky Dick” Lynn and “the Italian” Piffer, whose “work” has been analyzed, and refuted, here and elsewhere. Mr. Hello Hello Hello is like a loose cannon rolling along the deck of the HMS HBD, firing away wildly. Keep it up, Eddie.
And then we have this, courtesy of Counter-Currents:
But there is a faction of the Dissident Right who believe that Bernie Bros should be the next frontier. Richard Spencer — whose new wife is a DSA socialist — recently endorsed Bernie Sanders for president, and TRS’s Fash the Nation has been giving Bernie glowing — no pun intended — coverage lately.
Can you doubt Sallis when I say that Der Movement is a pathetic joke?
See this. I will assume that Strom is sincere in his concern about White demographics, his attitudes toward the Jewish power establishment, and his worries about the “browning of America.” Very well. Now, Ron Unz is a wealthy Jew who has written positively about the Hispanic influx into America and has written negatively about White nationalism. Unz is a promoter of HBD, a cult that celebrates “high Jewish and Asian IQ.” Indeed, Unz has funded, according to online documentation, the likes of “Razib” Khan and Greg Cochran. Curiously, certain “White nationalists” write for Unz’s website, promoting the Unzian HBD agenda. Whether they are paid to do so I do not know. Nevertheless, the idea of a White nationalist writing for Unz is one that, in my opinion, any authentic White nationalist should denounce. Unfortunately, Strom has heretofore refused to critique Unz and the Unzian clique of WN traitors.
This is HBD:
I believe that the biggest problem facing our planet is the growth in the world’s population. I believe that the second biggest problem is that people with IQ’s below 100 are having more children than people with IQ’s above 100. I believe that the third biggest problem is that computer technology and automation are eliminating jobs people with IQ’s below 100 are able to learn.
I believe the human species is approaching another genetic shakeout. It won’t be pretty, but the result will be a human population with a much higher average intelligence. Because I believe that the trend toward miscegenation is unstoppable, and will accelerate, this more intelligent human species will be a multi racial hybrid.
Again, we see the HBD objective: Whites mongrelized out of existence, a “high IQ” Jeurasian admixed caste – but no doubt large numbers of unmixed Chinamen will continue to exist; you can’t mongrelize 1.4 billion ethnocentric White-hating Orientals. Interesting that some of us are labeled as “paranoid” and “crazy and bitter” for denouncing HBD for things that the HBDers themselves heartily embrace.
HBD is purely an anti-White hate cult. Meanwhile, Strom is strangely silent about HBD. Why?
It is a good deal easier to get along with blacks from the Caribbean than it is wit [sic] natural-born American blacks, especially when they are urban, less so if they are rural.
Obviously this is someone who never had to live among Jamaicans, who are as far below “American” Blacks as the latter are from Whites. Reggae is to rap what rap is to Mozart. Experto Crede.
The retard Zman:
In reality, the alt-right was doomed when the face of it became a narcissistic dilettante, incapable of organizing a one car funeral. A serious movement never would have tolerated Spencer as the leader.
Sure. But that’s incomplete. Let’s rewrite that last sentence:
A serious movement never would have tolerated Spencer, Johnson, Taylor, Pierce, Duke, Brimelow, MacDonald, Parrott, Heimbach, (fill in the blank for any other of the myriad Quota Queens), as leaders.
Back to Zman:
The whole Spencer fiasco puts the lie to the claims by some that optics are unimportant in their politics. The sole reason Spencer rose to become the face of the alt-right is he looked good on camera.
No, you liar, that’s not the sole reason.
Politics is always about keeping the ends in mind and making the necessary compromises to further those ends.
As long as those compromises do not compromise the ends themselves, which is something all of the mainstreamers and “dissident right” grifters do not (or pretend to do not) understand. When the means contradict the ends, then those means are useless, no matter how “practical” they are. Sailer’s “citizenism” is a perfect example, albeit that Sailer’s error is compounded by the reality that “citizenism” is no more practical in today’s America than is full-throated White nationalism.
Politics is a means to an end.
Indeed it is.
Ideologues always fall into the trap of thinking politics is an end in itself…
No, you shallow-minded retard. If the ideology is structured to achieve a specific end, then it is necessary. Indeed, it is anti-ideological “practical” “political pragmatism” that ends up believing that “being in power” is an end in itself, regardless of what is or is not achieved with that power.
…which is why ideological states are always unstable and usually short lived.
Define “ideological state.”
Successful outsider politics has to be practical in its application in order to win ground in the vast area that is always up for grabs between the orthodoxy and those challenging it.
And then do what with that “won ground?” Mainstream conservatism took that “won ground” and surrendered it without a fight to the Left. Is that the sort of “pragmatic success” we should emulate?