Category: Duchesne

Duchesne, Strom,and Lynn

In der news.

Listen to this.  That is a generally good podcast, and they – particularly Johnson – do a good job dissecting the SJW nonsense against Duchesne.  I regret to hear that Duchesne had to prematurely retire because of this outrageous situation.  The whole scenario does confirm everything I’ve been writing the last few days about how activists and potential activists need to be prudent and take care of themselves first. If even a tenured professor with excellent student comments can be forced out, how is some level military recruit going to survive?

I did not like Johnson’s comments about how professors use convoluted and incomprehensible language.  That may be the norm in the fields of Duchesnse and Johnson, but STEM people strive for clarity, particularly with all the ESL Asians reviewing papers and grants (and using any excuse to trash quality White work in order to open space for their own co-ethnics).

A good piece by Strom.  When he sticks to sociopolitical and broad racial themes, and not population genetics, he does well.  Despite my occasional criticism, I am thankful lo Strom for his ADV broadcasts in the 1990s that helped form my initial “movement” worldview (Pierce also contributed to this).  Criticism from my direction is never meant to be personal, but corrective.


Let’s look at this nonsense once again.  Emphasis added:

Richard Lynn: It was in 1977 when I discovered that the intelligence of the Japanese was 3 IQ points higher than that of white Americans. Hitherto, virtually all discussions of race differences in intelligence had been concerned with the problem of why white Americans and British had higher IQs than other peoples, and this was generally attributed to the tests being biased in their favor. My discovery about the Japanese set me thinking about whether other Northeast Asian peoples (Chinese and Koreans) have higher IQs that Europeans. I began collecting studies on this and found that they did.

Collecting studies  – such as Chinese testing done under problematical conditions and confined to coastal elites and college students, “estimating” IQ through PISA scores, and all the rest of the Lynnian flim-flam.

Richard Lynn: I regard the most important to be what I have called “the cold winters theory” to explain the evolution of race differences in intelligence. The theory explains the relation between the IQs of the races and the coldness of the winters. Thus, the Northeast Asians had to survive the coldest winters and evolved the highest IQs (105) followed by the Europeans (100), North Africans and South Asians (84) and sub-Saharan Africans (70). I first proposed this theory in 1991 and it has become widely accepted.

Widely accepted by who?  You and other HBDers and an assortment of Nutzis?  Let us put aside for the moment whether or not Lynn is correct. The assertion that his theory is “widely accepted” is plain wrong and borderline delusional.  Mainstream psychometricians, behavioral scientists, etc. do not endorse Lynn’s views.

Richard Lynn: “The Jews of the East” is a good description of the Chinese in Thailand and other Southeast Asian countries, including Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia, and the Philippines. In all these countries the Chinese have been minorities that have been more successful than the majority indigenous populations, just as the Jews have been in Europe and the United States, and for the same reason: they have higher IQs. I have documented this in my book The Global Bell Curve: Race IQ and Inequality Worldwide (2008).

Ethnocentrism and ethnic nepotism have nothing to do with that, no sir!  Lynn documents this by referring to…his own “work.”

Grégoire Canlorbe: Notwithstanding his early death following cerebral edema, martial artist and actor Bruce Lee may be seen as a successful case of Chinese-European crossbreeding. To what extent does the miscegenation between a white man (or woman) and a Chinese woman (or man) prove to be—generally speaking—more eugenic and healthy than the one between a white and an Arab or a Black?

The idea that you can justify miscegenation because of “look at that celebrity” is something the Left (or Derbyshire) promotes; it is the most juvenile and shallow type of “analysis” possible.  Look at Halle Berry!  Hubba Hubba!  That White-Back mixing is real eugenic and healthy!  I mean, these HBDers will say and do anything to promote their genocidal anti-White Jeurasian agenda.

Richard Lynn: Children inherit genes equally from both parents, and in large samples their children have the average of their fathers and mothers. Thus, if one parent has an IQ of 120 and the other has an IQ of 100, the average of their children will be 110. 

Evidence?  Well, you see 120 + 100 divided by 2 = 110, so that’s that!  HBD “science.”

But these are only averages, and there is a wide range of the IQs of siblings who typically differ by about 10 IQ points. With regard to mixed-race children, in my latest calculations, the Chinese have an average IQ of 105 and Whites have an average IQ of 100, so the average White-Chinese child will have an IQ 102.5. Arabs have an average IQ of 84 so Arab-White children will have an average IQ of 92, while blacks in sub-Saharan Africa have an average IQ of 70, so black-white children will have an average IQ 85, which is what they have in the United States. Of course, these are averages and there is a wide range of IQs in the parents and the children of all these groups.

Even IF these IQ scores are valid, and even IF IQ was completely genetic and heritable – which even Lynn himself does not believe, see below – why would anyone believe that the outcome of mixing is going to be in a simple additive fashion (even if averaged over large numbers of people)?  While some heritable traits do behave in a simple additive fashion, many, probably most, do not. To blithely assume that IQ is going to behave in such a fashion, in the absence of supportive evidence, is the height of childish stupidity.

Lynn’s retardation, and proof of my critique, is amply demonstrated by his own comment: “…while blacks in sub-Saharan Africa have an average IQ of 70, so black-white children will have an average IQ 85, which is what they have in the United States.”  “American” Blacks are not even 50:50 mixes of Whites and Black Africans – they are mostly African with a minority of White admixture.  Obviously then, if we take the IQ scores at face value, and even if we assume it is all genetic, it is NOT a simple additive model.  If American Negroes are ~ 80% African and ~ 20% European, how can you argue that a simple additive model of 100 IQ and 70 IQ is going to give 85 IQ?  Obviously, the genes for higher IQ are disproportionately influential or there has been selection or strong environmental influences.  Note that Canlorbe does not challenge Lynn about this obvious logical flaw.  Lynn is used to an “amen corner” of sycophants who agree with all his pontifications without a murmur of skepticism.  Obviously, this is not science.

Fourth, national IQs will continue to increase in economically developing nations. There may be some dysgenic fertility resulting in a decline in genotypic intelligence but this will be more than compensated for by improvements in nutrition, health, and education as it was in economically developed nations during most of the 20th century. 

Environmental effects, hmmm?

Fifth, there has been dysgenic fertility in China during the last half century. Despite this, there was a large increase of 15 IQ points in the intelligence of Chinese children from 1988 to 2006 as a result of improvements in nutrition, health, and education, and the average IQ of Chinese-British children in 2006 was estimated as 109.8.

Lynn admitting environmental effects on IQ…for Chinese.  For Europeans, well….no. And why assume that the Chinese immigrants to Britain were a representative sample of the main Chinese population?  This is all ludicrous – Lynn and his followers don’t even pretend to be doing real science, with hypothesis testing, skepticism, and controlling for variables. It’s a joke.

By 2016, the National Science Board reported that China had overtaken the United States in the number of articles published in science and technology.

Lynn of course leaves out that many of these articles are the result of rampant ethnic nepotism, with Chinese publishing in Chinese journals or in “Western” journals that have Chinese editors and reviewers (based on my observations, Chinese also engage in ethnic nepotism in grant reviewing). Ever read any of these Chinese articles?  Full of errors, omissions, sloppy methodology, lack of proper controls, incorrect interpretations.  But someone like Lynn is not going to critique shoddy scholarship, because that hits too close to home.

It is likely that this lead will grow as intelligence in China continues to increase, as it has in other economically developing nations, as a result of further environmental improvements. There is also likely to be an increase of intelligence in China with a reduction in air pollution which at present is lowering intelligence in many towns and cities. 

So here Lynn again admits environmental effects on IQ (see above).  Note that he defends Chinese IQ as being negatively influenced by environment, but he would never do the same for, say, Southern Italians (or the Irish).  Still think that HBD has no political motivation?

Thus, as intelligence continues to increase in China and decline in Europe and the United States, China is likely to emerge as the world’s superpower in the second half of the 21st century.

HBDers all spontaneously ejaculate.

HBD is the absolute worst “rightist” race-related paradigm. Virtually anything and everything else is better.  For example, Nordicism is, literally, infinitely superior to HBD.Nordicists at least ostensibly want to preserve, and promote in the interests of a subset of Europeans – “Germanics” of Northwest European descent.  HBDers on the other hand want Europeans humiliated and subjugated to Jews and Asians, and eliminated via a Jeurasian mongrelization.  HBD is the traitor within the gates; HBD is utter filth.

I deeply regret ever saying anything positive about the work of Lynn and Rushton; I do sometimes make errors, particularly in my early days as a Nutzi, and I openly admit these egregious mistakes.

PopGen June 2019

Two papers.

The first:

Abstract
In many species a fundamental feature of genetic diversity is that genetic similarity decays with geographic distance; however, this relationship is often complex, and may vary across space and time. Methods to uncover and visualize such relationships have widespread use for analyses in molecular ecology, conservation genetics, evolutionary genetics, and human genetics. While several frameworks exist, a promising approach is to infer maps of how migration rates vary across geographic space. Such maps could, in principle, be estimated across time to reveal the full complexity of population histories. Here, we take a step in this direction: we present a method to infer maps of population sizes and migration rates associated with different time periods from a matrix of genetic similarity between every pair of individuals. Specifically, genetic similarity is measured by counting the number of long segments of haplotype sharing (also known as identity-by-descent tracts). By varying the length of these segments we obtain parameter estimates associated with different time periods. Using simulations, we show that the method can reveal time-varying migration rates and population sizes, including changes that are not detectable when using a similar method that ignores haplotypic structure. We apply the method to a dataset of contemporary European individuals (POPRES), and provide an integrated analysis of recent population structure and growth over the last ∼3,000 years in Europe.

That’s interesting, I suppose, but what is really needed from population genetics is two things.  First, global assays of genetic kinship.  Second, application of genetic structure and genetic integration (e.g., Gillet and Gregorious) to human genetic data. These things are consistently not being done. Is it because they are viewed as uninteresting to the field, or is it because the findings would be politically unpalatable to the field?

Author summary
We introduce a novel statistical method to infer migration rates and population sizes across space in recent time periods. Our approach builds upon the previously developed EEMS method, which infers effective migration rates under a dense lattice. Similarly, we infer demographic parameters under a lattice and use a (Voronoi) prior to regularize parameters of the model. However, our method differs from EEMS in a few key respects. First, we use the coalescent model parameterized by migration rates and population sizes while EEMS uses a resistance model. As another key difference, our method uses haplotype data while EEMS uses the average genetic distance. A consequence of using haplotype data is that our method can separately estimate migration rates and population sizes, which in essence is done by using a recombination rate map to calibrate the decay of haplotypes over time. An additional useful feature of haplotype data is that, by varying the lengths analyzed, we can infer demography associated with different recent time periods. We call our method MAPS for estimating Migration And Population-size Surfaces. To illustrate MAPS on real data, we analyze a genome-wide SNP dataset on 2224 individuals of European ancestry.

I’m not going to judge the validity of this approach without more data; however, any cursory look at current population genetic studies illustrates how the “testing companies” are behind the cutting edge of methodology.

Largely speaking, the spatial variation in inferred dispersal rates and population densities is remarkably consistent across the different time scales (Fig 4). In the MAPS dispersal surfaces, several regions with consistently low estimated dispersal rates coincide with geographic features that would be expected to reduce gene flow, including the English Channel, Adriatic Sea and the Alps. 

In general, geographic barriers have historically impeded (but obviously not abrogated) gene flow.

In addition we see consistently high dispersal across the region between the UK and Norway, which may reflect the known genetic effects of the Viking expansion [22]. 

See more on this below.

These features are consistent with visual inspection of the raw lPSC sharing data (S4b Fig). The MAPS population density surfaces consistently show lowest density in Ireland, Switzerland, Iberia, and the southwest region of the Balkans. This is consistent with samples within each of these areas having among the highest PSC segment sharing (S4a Fig). The MAPS inferred country population sizes are also highly correlated with estimated current census population sizes from [36] and [37] (S5 Fig) which can be mainly attributed to the fact that lPSC segments are highly informative of current census population sizes (Fig 5).

And then:

We do note the lower estimated dispersal rates between Portugal and Spain compared to the rest of Europe in the analyses of longer PSC segments (5-10 and > 10cM), and the higher estimated dispersal rates through the Baltic Sea (> 10cM segments), possibly reflecting changing gene flow in these regions in recent history.

I’m not sure what to make of that Iberian data.  I’m not aware of any significant geographical barrier there, so is that an example of political barriers affecting gene flow?  The data of this paper call into question “testing companies” using generalized “Iberian” or “British/Irish” ancestral categories.

Our estimates of dispersal distances and population density from the POPRES data are among the first such estimates using a spatial model for Europe (though see [30]). The features observed in the dispersal and population density surfaces are in principle discernible by careful inspection of the numbers of shared PSC segments between pairs of countries (e.g. using average pairwise numbers of shared segments, S4b Fig, as in [20]). For example, high connectivity across the North Sea is reflected in the raw PSC calls: samples from the British Isles share a relatively high number of PSC segments with those from Sweden (S4b Fig). 

This is consistent with what is mentioned above, compatible with the historically known gene flow from Scandinavia to the British Isles, particularly England, during the Viking age.

Also the low estimated dispersal between Switzerland and Italy is consistent with Swiss samples sharing relatively few PSC segments with Italians given their close proximity (S4b Fig). 

The Alps being one of the geographical barriers mentioned above.  This of course is not compatible with Der Movement dogma of Northern Italians being “Celto-Germanic Nordics.”

However, identifying interesting patterns directly from the PSC segment sharing data is not straightforward, and one goal of MAPS (and EEMS) is to produce visualizations that point to patterns in the data that suggest deviations from simple isolation by distance.

The inferred population size surfaces for the POPRES data show a general increase in sizes through time, with small fluctuations across geography; In our results, the smallest inferred population sizes are in the Balkans and Eastern Europe more generally. This is in agreement with the signal seen previously [20]; however, taken at face value, our results suggest that high PSC sharing in these regions may be due more to consistently low population densities than to historical expansions (such as the Slavic or Hunnic expansions).

Relative population density may be a driver of genetic history, and one ignored by Der Movement in lieu of more colorful stories about expansions and admixture.

Second paper:

The roles of migration, admixture and acculturation in the European transition to farming have been debated for over 100 years. Genome-wide ancient DNA studies indicate predominantly Aegean ancestry for continental Neolithic farmers, but also variable admixture with local Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Neolithic cultures first appear in Britain circa 4000 BC, a millennium after they appeared in adjacent areas of continental Europe. The pattern and process of this delayed British Neolithic transition remain unclear. We assembled genome-wide data from 6 Mesolithic and 67 Neolithic individuals found in Britain, dating 8500-2500 BC. Our analyses reveal persistent genetic affinities between Mesolithic British and Western European hunter-gatherers. We find overwhelming support for agriculture being introduced to Britain by incoming continental farmers, with small, geographically structured levels of hunter-gatherer ancestry. Unlike other European Neolithic populations, we detect no resurgence of hunter-gatherer ancestry at any time during the Neolithic in Britain. Genetic affinities with Iberian Neolithic individuals indicate that British Neolithic people were mostly descended from Aegean farmers who followed the Mediterranean route of dispersal. We also infer considerable variation in pigmentation levels in Europe by circa 6000 BC.

Contra Duchesne, ancestry deriving from Neolithic farmers is not restricted to Southern Europe; it is just much more concentrated there.

Sunday in Der News: 4/28/19

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

All the main characters have blue eyes…Michael Ironside plays the teacher/lieutenant Jean Rasczak…

See this.

NAME: Michael Ironside
DATE OF BIRTH: 12 Feb 1950 Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
HAIR COLOUR: BROWN
EYE COLOUR: BROWN
STARSIGN: Aquarius

And this.

Michael Ironside eye color Dark brown

And also this.

At the very last scene of that, there’s a scene in SCANNERS where I’m set on fire and my head comes up and those scleras they put on your eyes, they had scratched all my corneas. So the contact lenses they had made for me to change my eye color didn’t fit properly because my eyes had been scratched. Dick Smith happened to have with him Dustin Hoffman’s eyes from LITTLE BIG MAN and they were actually oversized, and you wouldn’t normally do this because they have to be fitted, but when you see me come out from under that coat at the end of SCANNER, those blue eyes of mine are Dustin Hoffman’s from LITTLE BIG MAN.

Apparently, Hoffman used colored contact lenses in Little Big Man, and that film image was used for Ironside’s eyes in Scanners because of Ironside’s scratched corneas.

I know Unz has an agenda, but, please, do better.

I can imagine that some people will question the importance of this. “Who cares?” they will declare.  No doubt, I will be accused of pedantic nitpicking. However, there is a larger issue here than just the eye color of Michael Ironside. One defining characteristic of Der Movement is people making self-assured public pronouncements that are not only wrong, but very easily demonstrated to be wrong with about thirty seconds of casual googling.  We have Duchesne, whose main focus is the uniqueness of Western civilization, completely misrepresenting the Neolithic farmer ancestry in Europeans. We have Mangan and his smug bombastic comments about most Italian-Americans being of North Italian descent. We have Alt Righters stating “Arthur Kemp was right” concerning Ancient Egyptian genetics that demonstrate precisely the opposite. What we see is carelessness, sloppiness, and a lack of attention to detail that is all very disconcerting, and that is, in my opinion, directly associated with the endless failures of “leadership” and all of the infiltrations and other lapses in judgment.  

Imagine you were reading the resume or CV of someone applying to you for employment, and you observe that their submission is full of spelling, grammar, and formatting errors. Would you hire them?  It is the same principle – can you trust people in positions of authority who make mistakes that could have been avoided with minimal effort, with minimal care, with minimal attention to detail?

We’ll wait and see what the facts are, but likely this will be used an another excuse for censorship.  I really wish these numbnuts would stop shooting up places of worship. It’s not advancing any sort of “cause,” my friends.  Just stop.

The NRA is not part of the “movement,” but it is part of the broader “Right” even though they claim to also represent “pro-gun liberals” and other such rare creatures.

Ollie North!   And now he’s out at the NRA.

Peak Alt Right and Other News

More “movement” madness.

Peak Alt Right.  Affirmative action at its best. One needs to comprehend what is going on here.  One candidate is a Chinaman whose signature policy initiative is to pay off Whites so that they accept their demographic, cultural, political, social, and economic dispossession, and so they won’t “act out” against their Asian masters and betters. The other candidate is a part-Samoan woman who advocates reparations for Negroes.  And that is who the Alt Right faction of Der Movement is endorsing.

Science over Der Movement: Absolutely correct. Duchesne has good intentions no doubt, but the Ostara-style analysis has to go.  Doesn’t look like Arnold playing Conan.  

Johnson censoring further ripostes to Duchesne.  Maybe “Weak” should instead post over at The Unz Review, that deep repository of “movement” “thought.” Maybe they’ll be a few shekels in it for him if he does.

Brown truths.  But, but,. but…Joan of Arc. Actually, Johnson’s constant references to Joan of Arc is interesting considering that a certain august “movement” personage, who shall go nameless, is said to have an obsessive fascination with that historical figure. Whether there is any connection with respect to that, or whether it is merely coincidence, is unknown at this time. However, Joan of Arc was a genuine heroine for the French people, and to invoke her name to defend YouTube Alt Lite bimbos is akin to blasphemy.

Duchesne and Other News

In der news.

If Duchesne thinks that only Southern Europeans have Neolithic Anatolian Farmer ancestry, he’s completely wrong. That ancestry is at its highest levels in Southern Europe, but it is found, at various levels, in all parts of Europe.

The way to argue against the meme of “Europeans are just mongrels from migrations” is NOT to argue that all of the ancestors of modern Europeans sprang up from the soil of Europe back into the mists of time. If you go back far enough, hominid origins were in Africa (most likely). 

The proper argument is to point out that EVERY group was formed by migrations and mixes, including all of the colored “indigenous” groups the SJWs so love.  Amerindians originated in Asia; however, we call them indigenous Native Americans because their process of ethnogenesis took place in the Americas, their identity as a group is historically rooted in the Americas, they are the oldest extant group to have come into being in the Americas, and they became a genetically and culturally distinct group (distinct from their own ancestors as well) in the Americas.  The same applies to Europeans in Europe.  I define “indigenous” here.

And the fact that something occurred in the past does not obligate us to accept something similar happening in the present or future. The fact that my embryonic and fetal development took place in my mother’s reproductive tract does not mean that I should go out and attempt to shove my head up a woman’s vagina.

How a group came to be in no way obligates it to pursue or accept a course of events that would lead to its diminishment and demographic replacement. And, anyway, ancient European genetics tend to overlap in PCA plots in a general sense with various modern European populations; none of them overlap with Nigerians or Chinamen.

So much winning!

More and more winning!

Trump the radical leftist.  Trump the architect of White Genocide. Trump the God Emperor of the Great Replacement.  Trump the Traitor.

You see what happens when you have “court Jews” in positions of influence?  How is Unz any different?

Girrrl power!  Agency!  Joan of Arc!  Lauren Southern!  It is all one!

Fits in well with the Catholic Church or with Alt Right meetings.

The same applies to Der Movement.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal. The HBDers weep.  Emphasis added:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A former engineer and a Chinese businessman have been charged with economic espionage and conspiring to steal trade secrets from General Electric Co to benefit China, according to an indictment unsealed by the U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday.
The indictment against the former GE engineer, Xiaoqing Zheng, and Chinese businessman Zhaoxi Zhang, comes after Zheng was initially charged in August in connection with the alleged theft. It marks the first time the U.S. government has formally said the scheme was carried out to benefit China and that the Chinese government provided “financial and other support.”
According to the indictment, Zheng stole the proprietary data on GE’s turbine technology by encrypting the files on his computer and secretly embedding them into a digital photograph of sunset before emailing the photograph to his personal email.
Zheng, 56, pleaded not guilty on Tuesday and was allowed to remain free on bond. His attorney Kevin Luibrand declined to comment.
The charges are the latest in a handful of cases brought by the Justice Department since last year as part of a broader crackdown by the Trump administration, which has vowed to fight Chinese theft of corporate secrets, cheating through intellectual property theft, illegal corporate subsidies and the use of rules that hamper U.S. corporations that want to sell their goods in China.
The FBI has said in the past that nearly every one of the agency’s 56 field offices have investigations into economic espionage tied to China.
The 14-count indictment against the pair charges that Zheng, who worked at GE Power & Water in Schenectady, New York, stole multiple electronic files containing details about design models, engineering drawings and other specifications related to the company’s gas and steam turbines.
Prosecutors say he emailed the files to Zhang, who was located in China.
GE said in a statement it has “been in close cooperation with the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for some time on this matter.”
The two men allegedly used the stolen information to advance their own business interests in two turbine research and development companies – Liaoning Tianyi Aviation Technology Co Ltd and Nanjing Tianyi Avi Tech Co Ltd.
The indictment adds that the pair received financial and other support from the Chinese government through those two companies, and they coordinated with Chinese government officials.
According to the indictment, Zheng told GE in February 2016 that he was operating an aviation parts supply company in China with his brothers, and asked permission to ensure it did not violate any rules about conflicts of interest. GE approved his proposal, asking that he protect the company’s intellectual property.
About a year later, around November or December 2017, GE discovered a large number of encrypted files saved on Zheng’s computer.
By July 2018, the company learned he had embedded the files in the seemingly innocuous photo of a sunset and emailed them to himself.
In interviews with the FBI in August 2018, prosecutors said he admitted to taking GE files. He also told agents his companies in China had received grant money from the Chinese government.
Zheng and Zhang, 46, were formally indicted on April 18. A jury trial has been set for June 24 in Albany, New York. Zhang was believed to be in China, the Justice Department said.
Zero creativity.  Zero contributions to human progress.  Everything copied and stolen.  But they have those high, high. high IQs!  Yellow Supremacy!  Yang Gang! Asian overlords!  Rice burning!  Hail Derbyshire!  Hail measured groveling!  Hail Asia!  Hail!

Silk Road News: 6/24/17

More Asian perfidy.

Another law-abiding cogelite.

Duchesne’s work.

Duchesne found it hard to avoid the conclusion that today’s Detroit is no more part of the West than ancient Egypt had been under the rule of a tiny Greek-speaking elite. The same goes for majority-Chinese Vancouver, where the remaining Whites are being forced into small apartments as foreign Chinese millionaires buy up the city’s housing stock, pricing them out of the market. A city can no longer meaningfully be considered Western when the majority of its population is pursuing interests opposed to those of its European-descended inhabitants.

Question: are the snide remarks of Silkers about “Puerto Ricans in the movement” aimed at Duchesne as retaliation for Duchesne’s steadfast opposition to Asians colonizing Canada? After all, as we all know, Asians absolutely have the right to colonize Western lands, which is of course somehow consistent with “European EGI.”

Another member of the “evil party.”  Evil is as evil does, eh Silkers?

No problem!  Once we institute the Silk Road White Nationalism program, Asians living in White lands can have White slaves to toil for them!  It all helps “European EGI,” don’t you know!

Here’s an example when we should all support the police.

Race in the News, 9/19/16

Several items.


Why do Whites tolerate this?  Whites: A race of loser cucks, indeed.

On Yockey; I am gratified that some of my work is listed there to honor Yockey, a great man.

That’s good, but one tires about hearing about “Pepe and “Kek.”  The only good about those juvenile memes is that they represent a proof of principle about spreading memes independent of the System.  Now, can we actually start spreading memes apart from cartoon frogs and idiotic ranting?

Exactly, similar to the point I posted yesterday.  The hysteria about Trump is tragicomic. Apparently, calling a bomb a bomb is worse than someone actually planting the bomb in the first place.  The only flaw in Alt-Right analyses is that they don’t go far enough. The Left does not hate Trump merely because he speaks the truth (sometimes) in a politically incorrect manner and is thus agitating certain “White resentments” – it is more fundamentally because Trump is in their “minds” a proxy for White America, the real object of their unrelenting hatred.

Also: I’ll agree with Roissy on one thing – Trump’s Les Deplorables imagery was excellent and I must admit that Der Touchback has been handling the whole “basket” incident with considerable skill.