Category: Durocher

Odds and Ends: Behold the Female

And other items.

Behold the female:

Do Chinese women menstruate?  Seriously though, given the enormous genetic distance between Europeans and East Asians (note to Derbyshire), what makes these authors believe that their findings are generalizable?

Men do breast cancer research. Women help the cause in the only manner they are capable.

Resigns in disgrace.  Blames “revenge porn.”  Agency, where art thou?

Evolved to manipulate the male sex drive?  What stage in their cycle were those women flashing their breasts during the World Series? Probably much pre-menopausal female behavior can be ascribed to hormonal fluctuations rather than to rational thinking.

Read this.  Works with a virus.  Refused the vaccination.  Can’t handle a mouse without accidentally injecting herself with the virus.  Can’t remember what strain of virus she was using for the experiments.  I think milady should just stick (no pun intended) to things she can handle – like flashing breasts – and leave the lab work to fully evolved humans (men).

The evil of the XX chromosomes strikes again.  Just like the Carter case.  My explanation? Envy. Just as non-Whites hate, and want to destroy, Whites because of racial envy over inherent White superiority in all things (except for adaptive fitness), so do women hate, and want to destroy, men because of inherent male superiority in all things (except the ability to control sexual urges).  Just like non-Whites leverage White guilt and pathological altruism to exact their racial revenge, so do women leverage their sexuality to destroy men. They do so purposely and with malice aforethought. 

Related to the female issue:

Three take home points from Durocher:

First, he deals with issues that can be construed to be critical of women and the role women play in the West’s decline.  Any snide tweets from Sir Gaslight about this?

Second, his comment about the rise of homosexuals in Der Movement having at least partially to do with their lack of having nagging women around “enforcing social norms” is consistent with my assertion that those same homosexuals have no right to lecture heterosexual men about the place of women in racial activism and in the broader society. Not having to deal with the female in any sort of meaningful personal manner, the homosexual contingent’s input is as “useful” as are the racial comments of (high trust no doubt) SJW Whites who live in all-White areas but who sing the praises of racial diversity (for the rest of us).  By the way, the rise of the homosexual contingent is also due to the intense self-promoting networking their clique has been doing for the past 15-20 years, and their cynically instrumental promotion of certain “movement” dogmas in order to gain increased influence over the great unwashed of rank-and-file activists and over naive (heterosexual) “activist leaders.”

Third, Durocher’s despicable hypocrisy is on display once again when he writes about the “truth hurting” when it comes to biological group differences. This is a guy who only wrote about East Asian admixture in Northern Europe after weeks of ridicule from EGI Notes and then engaged in bizarre hand-waving to convince his readers that said admixture (the extent of which he understated, by the way) is of “great benefit to all humanity.” 

Other items:

Consider Judge Napolitano – that puff-haired Levantine wop whose face looks like it was formed by a spastic child jamming its fingers into a ball of putty. If we assume that Arabic Andy is a man of the Right, we observe a difference between Left and Right.  If a leftist commentator were to (rarely) criticize a liberal Democrat politician, particularly a President, they would criticize from the Left, they would accuse the individual in question of being insufficiently liberal, insufficiently progressive. They would never adopt rightist talking points to attack someone ostensibly on their side.  Rightists on the other hand routinely adopt leftist talking points to publicly criticize rightist political figures. Trump can, and should, be criticized from the Right; instead, “conservative” commentators critique Trump in exactly the same manner as their leftist counterparts. Is it any wonder that the Left always wins?  Of course, in this case, there have been suggestions that Napolitano’s constant sniping at Trump is due to his dago disgruntlement over being passed over for a judicial appointment.  If true, that’s one graceless guinea.

At this point, Der Movement has become a ludicrous caricature of itself.  Is there anyone or anything Swedish that Der Movement is not going to praise, identify with, worship, and be pathologically reticent to criticize in the slightest manner?  Thunberg is an obnoxious little turd, an arrogant flat-faced Ladogan over-flowing with self-satisfied SJW moral posturing, and Der Movement just can’t get enough of her. Forget about jumping the shark, Der Movement has jumped both Moby Dick and the Pequod, and is now hurtling over the Pacific Ocean. All we need now is for Durocher to write an essay describing how Patrik Hermansson is of great benefit to all humanity.  What about Friberg though?  Is that a Swede too far?

Counter-Comments comment about the good and great Greta:

Jud Jackson

Posted October 29, 2019 at 5:34 am | Permalink

Has anybody besides me noticed that she is supposedly 16 years old and yet looks like she has not gone through puberty yet? She looks like she is 11 or 12 at most.

Come now, Jud, don’t you know that those low-hormone k-selected Northeast Asians mature slowly?

Another shallow, superficial Counter-Currents post, the comments for which are better than the post itself. To reduce redundancy: Another Counter-Currents post.

Is this a reference to Pilleater’s revelations about drug use by certain parties at certain racialist meetings, combined with the drunken podcasts from DC-area loft apartments?

I’ll agree that such cliques are destructive.  Other ones are as well.  Pilleater commented on those also.

Odds and Ends, 10/28/19

Several issues.

About the MX missile.  I don’t know what’s worse there – the stupidity of Ronnie Raygun and Caspar Jewberger wanting to have the MX regardless of the utility of the basing scheme, Jimmy Carter’s liberal naivete, or the pure selfishness of those Utah ranchers (societal consensus, eh?) putting their personal comfort and economic interests ahead of the security of their nation. As far the first goes, I remember “dense pack” (accurately termed by some wags at that time as “dunce pack”- a completely stupid gamble which, if the underlying premise was wrong, would have led to the entire MX force being destroyed by a small surgical Soviet strike). Jimmy Carter was always a pathetic embarrassment, and I guess that high trust northern hunter gatherers with their jokes about “commodes” would sell out their nation for another head of cattle.  Winners one and all no doubt. The best option would have been the Scowcroft plan, minus the stupidity of “arms control.”  The Midgetman as a mobile deterrent force was a good idea, and could have constituted the bulk of the American ICBM force. Having a limited number (but more than just 100) of MX missiles in silos would then have made sense (but not “dense pack,” just regular silo deployment), if those missiles were held in reserve in case a surgical first strike was necessary (with the retirement of both the Titan II and then the MX, America currently has no ICBM with a heavy throw weight, and is now dependent on the aging Minuteman III).

Brandon Martinez
Posted October 27, 2019 at 5:56 am | Permalink
You must be a woman, throwing insults at awake men who don’t buy the fairy tale that females are anything but mindless robots who follow anything that suits their temporary interests in society.
Only a small percentage of women can actually think for themselves. The rest are just parrots of the established set of ideas that society tells them is correct.
And your claim that the majority of white women vote for “populist” parties is a laughable hoax. Prove it.
If only white women voted, I’d venture to say that not a single nationalist party would come to power ever again.
The only language that women understand is brute force.

Excellent.  Excellent.

A sane woman:

Elenka
Posted October 27, 2019 at 1:21 pm | Permalink
Women will be welcomed and honored in the movement when they take seriously their roles as respectful daughters, faithful wives, dignified mothers, and wise matrons. I assume male hostility is caused by the lack of these feminine roles in a man’s life. And I am not upset or offended by male hostility. How can it be otherwise? Men react to women. Ladies, know your place, in the home and on the farm, not in the office or at the ballot box.

If we assume this is really a woman, we note that she is more realistic about the female, and more considerate of male interests, than is Greg Johnson.  Very revealing indeed.

Another high trust northern hunter gatherer no doubt.  Building that societal consensus and all. No different than a typical organized crime Afrowop swarthoid engaged in illegal alien smuggling for money.  All equally disgusting.

Of course the Colored Chinese criticize the USA for “racial inequality.”  After all, White-hating Yellows must make common cause with their White-hating Black and Brown brothers as part of their Tropical Alliance.  And Derbyshire’s “Arctic Alliance?”  A pathetic figment of his imagination, a sweaty fantasy engaged in as he performs his “measured groveling” (his words, not mine) to “Rosie.” 

Once again I ask – does Unz pay contributors to The Unz Review?  Just asking, because I wonder what motivates the alleged “White nationalists” Johnson and Durocher to contribute there.  After all, Johnson has his own blog, and Durocher used to regularly contribute to Counter-CurrentsThe Occidental Observer, and other WN blogs.  Why write for a HBD Jew who previously labeled White nationalism as the biggest threat to America?  It’s not just the shekels, is it?

One can ask another question about Durocher, but, no, I’ll just sit back and laugh at the dunce-like utter cluelessness of Der Movement.  Dr. Jekyll is becoming a dim memory by now.

The HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance continues.

Countered-Currents

The title is not a mis-spelling.

How do you convince people to pay up? 

By being lying grifters?

Well, here at Counter-Currents, we raise funds by giving you good reasons to do so, which is to say by recounting our accomplishments…

Currently standing at a grand total of zero.

…by stating our ambitions…

Running a meeting not infiltrated or not compromised by homosexual sexual harassment of Pilleater.

…and by building the case for Counter-Currents as a part of your well-being and political future.

I suppose he’s talking to Jews and Coloreds here.

In short, we anchor ourselves to the truth and trust our readers to honor that truth, no matter what adversity we face. 

Failing that, they lie and then ban critics from commenting on the site.

Seeking the truth has consequences, though…

Like being banned from Counter-Currents.

…and so we find ourselves prosecuted and censored…

Interestingly, while Taylor and Spencer are banned from the EU, Johnson is not.

…while the blue- and purple-pilled masses avoid us like a racis’, huwite supremist, anti-semetic plague. And yet here we are, still standing – and slowly but steadily, our influence grows.

As does your bank account.  More “D’Nations,” please.

Peak hypocrisy, courtesy of Greg Johnson:

Greg Johnson

Posted October 2, 2019 at 9:57 am | Permalink

Arguing that repression is inevitable is just an attempt to evade responsibility for stupid and predictably counter-productive behavior. 

Like…Hermansson, Lewis, Pilleater,etc.

I think divisiveness is a good thing if it separates wheat from chaff, wise people from fools, etc.

When Sallis does it though, he’s just crazy and bitter.


More Johnson:

Anglin and weev are not bad actors. They have been the movement’s most valuable players since Charlottesville. They are actually the only prominent people who supported that fiasco and managed to learn from it. Most of the rest have such brittle egos that they are still in denial and thus have learned nothing.

After all, Johnson said that both of those gentlemen are the “new voices of WN 3.0” and as we know, Greg can never be wrong!   And, hey, brittle egos who can never learn anything – another positive Johnsonian trait is on display – self-awareness!


I suppose Durocher is telling us that Greta is of great benefit to all humanity:

…to those who dislike Greta’s brand of Transnational Green Communism, I say, like Water Sobchack concerning National Socialism: At least it’s an ethos.

As a matter of fact, I would say that Greta and her movement are possessed by a great deal of insight.

Must be those Siberian/East Asian genes.  Of great, great benefit, I tell ya.  Just like Hubert Humphrey. Seriously though, I honestly cannot tell whether Durocher is being sarcastic or not.  His “work” is so much of a self-parody in its hyper-extreme Nordicism that either interpretation is equally plausible.


After all, Der Movement needs a new “Aryan Princess” to “meme” about after being humiliated by “Taytay.” Who better than the scowling raging harridan scold Greta?  Any criticism of her is uncalled for, because, well, you know….

Reverse Sallis’ Law

It’s comical.

Sallis’ Law essentially says that in virtually every context, in every possible situation, Der Movement will have something bad to say about White ethnics, particularly Southern Europeans.

The opposite is true as well – a sort of Reverse Sallis’ Law – in virtually every context, in every possible situation, Der Movement will have something good to say about Nordics (or “Nordish”).  A recent laughable example of this was brought to us by Durocher, writing for the Jew Unz site, who, after regaling us with the horrors of MENA admixture in Southern Europe, subsequently told us that Siberian/East Asian admixture in Northern Europe is “a great benefit to humanity.”  Why, of course it is.

Here we see another example from Counter-Currents (emphasis added).  About Hubert Humphrey:

Hubert Horatio Humphrey, Jr. (1911-1978) was a deeply Minnesotan man. He was born in Wallace, South Dakota, a territory that is a cultural extension of Minnesota. His father’s family were of New England Puritan stock. His grandmother, Addie Regester Humphrey, taught at a Quaker school, and Humphrey’s mother, Christine Sannes, was from Norway. Humphrey was baptized into his mother’s Lutheran church, but he worshiped later in life as both a Methodist and a Congregationalist. Humphrey was thus genetically a mix of Minnesota’s native Nordic groups and culturally a mix of Minnesota’s deeply Protestant religious milieu.

Not surprisingly we learn:

Humphrey believed from his time in Baton Rouge that “discrimination” was what was driving black lack of accomplishment, and he sought to end it in Minneapolis.

And even less surprisingly:

Also, Humphrey was part of the group of talented men who got behind “civil rights” and sold it to the American public. They were probably the critical part of the coalition that allowed “civil rights” to occur in the first place. Essentially, adherents of “civil rights” – those men who pushed the Civil Rights acts of 1957 and 1964, as well as the Voting Rights Act of 1965, were valorous white men with deep roots in America’s past.

So, Humphrey was a race traitor, a disgusting monster who helped unleash the Black Plague upon America, who helped unleash “civil rights” and racial integration upon America, who helped unleash the 1965 Immigration Act upon America, who have caused untold suffering on countless White Americans, who have destroyed White American EGI, and who have doomed White Americans to eventual minority status and racial destruction. The conclusion derived from all of that?  Well – 

Hubert H. Humphrey is exactly the sort of person we need on our side.

Of course he is!  How could you ever doubt it?  The Hubert Humphreys of today fill Antifa cadres, vote for Obama, and want to outlaw White nationalism, they believe miscegenation is “God’s will,” but, by golly, these are the sort of people we need on our side!  Do we need any folks like Antonin Scalia on our side? No sir!  But folks like the “valorous” Humphrey – they are a great benefit to humanity, and don’t you forget it!

John Lindsay, Durocher, and Eyetalians

In all cases, emphasis added.

Lindsay was born in New York City on West End Avenue, to George Nelson Lindsay and the former Florence Eleanor Vliet.[1] He grew up in an upper-middle-class family of English and Dutch descent.[2] Lindsay’s paternal grandfather migrated to the United States in the 1880s from the Isle of Wight,[1] and his mother was from an upper-middle-class family that had been in New York since the 1660s.[2]

…the patrician Lindsay’s two terms as mayor of New York were a catastrophe from which the city, and even the nation, have still not entirely recovered. The pure embodiment of the elite orthodoxy of his day, Lindsay helped transform the debate on race in America with an agenda that provoked white flight from cities, welcomed militant black separatists into the mainstream, and introduced a vision of social welfare that encouraged dependency among the poor and nearly destroyed New York’s economy. 

Four-term congressman Lindsay catapulted into the limelight during the 1965 New York mayoral race, when his walking tours of Harlem and other black neighborhoods helped him capture 45 percent of the black vote and win the election-a remarkable achievement for a Republican from Manhattan’s Silk-Stocking district. His neighborhood forays later helped New York avoid the ugly race riots that afflicted so many American cities during the sixties. 

But during those tours, Lindsay made common cause with black militants like Sonny Carson, whose followers spouted viciously anti-white and anti-Semitic diatribes. The militants were restless for power, and Lindsay gave it to them. Appointed vice chairman of the Kerner Commission studying race riots in America, it was Lindsay who persuaded his colleagues to declare that racism was entirely to blame for the ghetto’s problems. The commission’s report helped push America away from an inclusive urban agenda that emphasized racial integration and toward a divisive, counterproductive one that stressed black power and community empowerment…

…Lindsay reshaped the notion of public assistance, previously considered a short-term safety net; anything more, in FDR’s prophetic words, risked becoming “a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.” Lindsay funded seminars on how to recruit ever more welfare recipients, abandoned screening of applicants’ eligibility, and set no time limits on benefits. Under his welfare commissioner, “Come and Get It” Mitchell Ginsberg, welfare rolls doubled, even though black unemployment was just 4 percent when Lindsay first took office. 

To pay for this, Lindsay instituted New York’s first-ever personal income tax, and he hiked corporate taxes. Otherwise, he showed little interest in the private sector. Unsurprisingly, New York’s now tax-crushed economy crashed at the start of his second term…Lindsay was so convinced of the moral justness of his cause that he dismissed anyone who questioned him (especially any outer-borough white) as a bigot, and rushed ahead with his ideas. Their unintended consequences still haunt New York, and the nation.

Yet Lindsay’s controversial legacy–a battle to improve the lot of the city’s poor, even if it came at the expense of the white middle class–continues to influence New York City’s political life.…he backed economic programs to aid blacks and Latinos but ran afoul of white ethnic voters outside Manhattan who felt threatenedLindsay pushed for integrated housing in white neighborhoods, only to spark a firestorm of protest… 

…“To this day, when you mention Lindsay’s name to a lot of people in Queens and Brooklyn, you get a nasty response,” said political consultant Hank Sheinkopf. “His name is synonymous with white flight to the suburbs and a sense among some whites that New York didn’t care about them.” 

“Let us not be so generous about who it was he was confronting,” said Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), who was Lindsay’s human rights commissioner. “These were not just folks who wanted to make sure that everything remained stable. These people [white ethnics] said, ‘Not a one of them [blacks] in this neighborhood.’ It’s difficult to find an accommodation with that.”

Thus, the Anglo-Negro-Jew alliance to destroy White ethnics. That a few Jewish schoolteachers may have suffered means nothing – just some collateral damage.  The main mass of Jews were right on board the Lindsay Train (air-conditioned for kosher comfort). And, no, I don’t believe that guys like Lindsay were merely naive.  How could they not know what they were doing?  It was pure ethnic aggression – using Blacks and Hispanics as potent biological weapons against the hated White ethnics. And what weapons!  More destructive than an atom bomb – just compare Detroit or Baltimore to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By the end of Lindsay’s mayoralty, the South Bronx looked worse than the outskirts of Hiroshima after Little Boy.  He knew exactly – exactly – what he was doing.  It was pure, unadulterated maliciousness.

Gee, Durocher finally mentions East Asian admixture in Northern Europe. His interpretation, his context, about this will of course not be surprising to readers of this blog:

We can then expect that this typically Nordic combination of genetic uniqueness and quality healthcare systems will prove beneficial to humanity as a whole.

They may be admixed, but, by gummint, they’re beneficial – beneficial, I say! – to humanity as a whole. And don’t you forget it!  


Hilarious.  And so utterly predictable.

And note the focus on Finland, as if clines of genes frequencies respect political borders. Bromstad and Bjork are not Finnish. Or Russian. Or Hungarian, etc.  


Sallis’ Law in action again – from this Durocher article on Finns, a comment includes:

And I guess there is something to preserve in having people who, of Europeans, are genetically as far as possible from Italians.

Come now, no matter what an article is about, we gotta fit dem dere dagoes in somewhere, preferably with a negative connotation.


And from another comment:

Actually, minus the refugees, crime and aggression are low in Finland. Judges are not blown up like they are in Sicily. There is no widespread organized crime in Finland. Whereas New Jersey and other East Coast cities have always had to deal with the mafia, the heavily Finnish Minnesota and Upper Michigan never did.

Keep in mind, the article was about not about Italians. But, hey, it doesn’t matter.  The article could have been about the cost of orange juice in Nebraska, and the wops would fit in somehow. The cost is lower in Nebraska, you see, because there are no racially mixed Arabic-Negro MENA Sicilian mafiosos controlling the orange juice trade.  Dat right!


The fetishists seem to think about nothing else, day or night, than (Southern) Italians.  What would they do if the wops never existed?  Well, there’s always the Portuguese, I suppose.

The not-so-secret secret of Der Movement is that it has Italians – at least Southern Italians – at the bottom of the racial hierarchy. They are the people about which nothing positive is ever said or written.  After all, the Jews are praised for their high IQ, the Negroes for their athletics and music, even the Australian Aboriginals are praised for their spatial skills.  But the wops?  They are just little greasy five foot tall superstitious roaches, scurrying around, desperately trying to avoid Humphrey Ireland’s frantic foot stomping.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate physical attractiveness in women with and without endometriosis.

DESIGN:

Case-control study.

SETTING:

Academic hospital.

PATIENT(S):

Three hundred nulliparous women.

INTERVENTION(S):

Assessment of attractiveness by four independent female and male observers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):

A graded attractiveness rating scale.

RESULT(S):

A total of 31 of 100 women in the rectovaginal endometriosis group (cases) were judged as attractive or very attractive, compared with 8 of 100 in the peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis group and 9 of 100 in the group of subjects without endometriosis. A higher proportion of cases first had intercourse before age 18 (53%, 39%, and 30%, respectively). The mean ± SD body mass index in women with rectovaginal endometriosis, in those with other disease forms, and in those without endometriosis was, respectively, 21.0 ± 2.5, 21.3 ± 3.3, and 22.1 ± 3.6. The median (interquartile range) waist-to-hip ratio and breast-to-underbreast ratio were, respectively, 0.75 (0.71-0.81), 0.76 (0.71-0.81), and 0.78 (0.73-0.83), and 1.15 (1.12-1.20), 1.14 (1.10-1.17), and 1.15 (1.11-1.18).

CONCLUSION(S):

Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups. Moreover, they had a leaner silhouette, larger breasts, and an earlier coitarche.

8/12/19 News

News.

Does anyone see a common thread in these stories?  The Ames story alone would fit in well with The Good Shepherd, but not in the manner in which Der Movement obsesses over that movie – or, shall we say, one particular scene in that movie.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

And the other shoe drops.

So much winning!

The current state of the “movement” – what an unmitigated disaster.  On the morning of Nov. 9, 2016, there were virtually unlimited opportunities for the “movement.”  There was enormous potential and it was all squandered, everything has been ruined – ruined by the Type I retards who make up the bulk of the rank-and-file and ruined even more by their affirmative action leadership, pathetic losers and professional failures whose only qualification for “movement leadership” is their ethnic background. 

And with all the serious issues as stake, “movement” “activists” are busy concentrating on what they perceive as crucially important matters – such as attempting to distort archaeogenetics findings even before they are published.

Reading online genetics forums, it seems like all my predictions about Der Movement’s reactions to the forthcoming Rome paper are coming true even before it is published.  The fetishists are foaming at the mouth, retconning their dogma with a vengeance.

Interestingly, many of these fetishists are Poles, who apparently believe that they’ll be accepted by NW Euros if they parrot then dogma even more vehemently than NW Euros do.  Fat chance of that.

Thus, the fetishists are pretending that the dogma was never that the Ancient Greeks and Romans (and Egyptians!) were Nordic. Oh no, perish the thought, that’s all down the memory hole.

Now, it’s that the Northern Italian-like real Romans were replaced (genocide!) by greasy Sicilian-like MENA immigrants.  And, of course, they say that assaying Ancient Rome is no different from assaying New York City – unless of course the findings were compatible with the original dogma and then they’d be crowing about the results and how “representative” they were.

The lesson here is that no matter what the findings of archaeogenetics, the fetishists will NEVER admit to being wrong. If a study demonstrated that King Leonidas was akin to a Nigerian, the fetishists would proclaim “Arthur Kemp was right!” – after all, in this scenario, Leonidas would be genetically distinct from modern Greeks, and wasn’t that all Kemp was saying?  Get with the program!  The fundamental dishonesty of these types is laughable.

Good to see that the Type Is have a good division of labor thing going on here.  Some of them keep busy retconning their disproved dogmas in truly Orwellian fashion, while others shoot up Walmarts and plan bombings, or look at child porn, which a certain VDARE contributor thinks should not be illegal.  

All of this is the direct outcome of Der Movement’s strict affirmative action policy.  Keep on enabling it, all you imbeciles out there.  And keep sending in those “D’Nations” to your “leaders” – after all, how else are they going to go on their trips to Europe while you sit in your parents’ basement, onanistically reveling over Durocher’s latest Unz posts?

More Durocher, 8/4/19

Further exposing the dishonest fraud.

 

Following up on my earlier post from today, let’s consider more about Durocher.  Laughably, Durocher is so excited about admixture in Southern Europe that he cannot even write a coherent English sentence:

This is in line with other studies finding their Europeans in the far south tend to be closer genetically to their North African or Middle-Eastern neighbors.

That can be interpreted in two different ways.  First, it can mean that if one were to compare Northern, Eastern, and Southern Europeans to North Africans and Middle Easterners, then the Southern Europeans are going to be “closer genetically” to North Africans and Middle Easterners than Northern or Eastern Europeans are. That’s of course true and expected given clines of gene frequencies (we will for the moment ignore what the results would be if we were to substitute “Siberians and East Asians” for “North Africans and Middle Easterners”).   Second, it can mean that Southern Europeans are “closer genetically to their North African or Middle-Eastern neighbors” than they are to other Europeans, which is of course false, and Durocher must know it is false.  Genetic kinship analysis – unfortunately only performed at this time by private entities because population geneticists ignore such studies – shows it be false, and Fst, which is performed by population geneticists, shows the same.  Unless Durocher believes that Southern Europeans are predominantly North African and Middle Eastern (and I do not believe that even he would have the temerity to push that lie), then obviously it is false.

But there’s more.  The study that Durocher cites was already discussed at this blog, see here (emphasis added).

Note that Germans are being used as the European component representative for the admixture analysis, and despite that, Northern and Central European populations are still getting percentages ascribed to “Saharawi” and “Qatari” components.  Given clinal gene frequencies, it is not surprising that Southern European populations are modeled as having North African and Near Eastern ancestral components compared to Germans, but what to make of, for example, such ancestry in Swedes, Norwegians, Scots, and the Irish?  I presume that Der Movement does not believe that such populations have any modern admixture from North African or Near Eastern sources. Therefore, the findings for those populations are artifacts from the modeling, ancient admixture, or both.  If that is so, then any “real” modern admixture in the Southern European populations has to be whatever small percentages in excess of that found in Northern and Central Europe, and even there, the clinal gene frequency issue has to be considered.  The same principles hold for the modeling in the preprint discussed above.

Durocher is aware of my work and of this blog, and yet he continues to promote his lies.  That tells you what you need to know about his character, or the lack thereof.

See this.The relevant table from the paper was put up as a comment on his own post, but Durocher ignores it. 100% dishonest fraud.

By the way, this blog has already discussed, years ago, the possible political and social implications of greater genetic heterogeneity in Southern Europe; so Durocher trying to imply that such insights are novel on his part is another lie.