Category: Durocher

Race in Der News, 1/17/17

The usual stupidities,
Ironically enough, one of the pictures accompanying this article shows invaders easily going under Orban’s pathetic chicken-wire fence.  If we know it’s happening, doesn’t Saint Viktor know?  And, so…?
Yes, and if Harry mates with mongrel Markle, so much for the “Nordic physical type.”  Are English patriots fed up with the “royal family” yet?  Of course, these “royals” already have a quite interesting bloodline. Nevertheless, the vast majority of their ancestry is European, and the vast majority of that is Anglo-Germanic; if they were to continue to intermarry with the native English stock, any Afro-Asiatic traces would be diluted out. Unfortunately, Harry, who seems to have inherited race-mixing proclivities from his mother, is currently intent on reinforcing, rather than diluting, such admixture.
Thus comes the ultimate peril of the China to all nations on earth and especially the White race whom China knows it must defeat and subdue, and if necessary, eliminate to achieve its ambitions, without mentioning the fact that China’s major ally and enabler, the international Jewry also shares this objective.
In a summary, in years China has morphed into a hybrid monster combining the worst and most sinister elements and vices of the traditional and modern China sifted and forged to survive and linger to this day: selfishness, ruthlessness, apathy, cruelty, bully, deceit, egotism, mendacity, jealousy, vindictiveness, amorality, duplicity, abusiveness, aggressiveness, vileness, violence and treachery… It is high time for the White people to wake up and stare at the dire reality of the Chinese question squarely and start thinking about countermeasures as soon as possible.
Jews and China.  Of course, the Silk Roaders claim that anyone – even virulent anti-Semites! – who does not grovel to Asians is either Jewish or is a pro-Jew who “sucks Jewish cock” (exact quote).
AJ: To what extent, if any, do you see yourself as White, or a part of Western culture?
RJ: I do not consider Jews to be white, even Ashkenazis. We have a fundamentally different identity, despite some of us having European blood.

Fair is Fair, 12/16/16

Celebrating some reasonableness.

I have been critical of Durocher in the past (and will no doubt be so in the future), but one must be fair, and I see nothing at all wrong with this – actually, I would strongly endorse most of it.  It is of course interesting that he chooses Radix – the site of Richard “Big Europe” Spencer – to promote this very pan-European vision, but never mind.

Of course, there are some commentators who are unable to distinguish a confederation of autonomous states from a “Roman Empire,” but then extreme ethnonationalists have never been a very impressive lot.  Who says Bavaria can’t have its own local autonomy?  The point is, without Europe, Bavaria is virtually meaningless on the world stage. Rest assured, China cares not one bit about the bucolic charms of various European locales (even though they may want to copy them in a bizarre fashion to make a buck), and would not hesitate to move against atomized micro-states.  And if “the people just want to be left alone” then why don’t they vote that way?  To start with, the Germans, including all those wanna-be autonomous Bavarians, can stop voting for Merkel and start voting for Alternative for Germany (putting aside why they never supported the NPD).

Further, not only has Durocher written a reasonable post, Silver has written reasonable comments to that post.  What’s the world coming to?  Anyway, fair is fair, I must encourage reasonableness as well as discourage unreasonableness.  I’m still very wary and suspicious, however.

In any case, I don’t see why a person cannot be, at the same time, a Bavarian and a German and a European.  Where’s the problem with that?

Strom and Johnson

Some comments.

Kevin Strom is one of the few people on the far-Right who talk sense about Trump.

Greg Johnson is another.  While I usually agree with him on most things, a serious point of departure is described in this brief fisking.

When I speak of White Nationalism, I mean ethnic nationalism for every particular white ethnic group — Italians, French, Americans, Canadians, etc. — not some sort of European Imperium and melting pot, an idea which is revolting on the face of it, since it replicates all of the problems of globalization merely on a smaller scale…

Some problems, perhaps, but then the nation state can have the same problems as well. Greg is talking to Italians there.  Very well.  There are separatists in Italy who feel that the Italian state smothers their identity as does globalism, and the Flemish in Belgium feel similarly and there are other such examples.  Well, fine, let them separate.  Very good.  And how does a micro-state of Flanders or Padania or Catalonia or whatever make its way in a world with a clash of civilizations and with single nations (e.g., China and India) which contain hundreds of millions more people than all the Whites on Earth combined?  An alliance of White states perhaps?  A European Imperium that preserves a degree of internal sovereignty and certainly prevents internal migration flows, but puts up a common front for defense, space exploration and other science/technics, and various cultural projects? What’s wrong with that?  Even Durocher I believe endorsed that at one time or another.  Or do we try and have nations of several million trying to have relevance in a world with nations of over a billion?

…and which could never be realized without the fratricidal European wars…

Brought to us by ethnonationalism, which wrecked the White race with its internal feuds.

 …it is supposed to prevent. 

Why can’t the Imperium be voluntary, a confederation of nationalists?

If advocates of a white Imperium want to prove that it is more than a pipe dream, they can demonstrate this by first putting Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia back together.

Why should they?  Serbia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia can all be independent members of an Imperium that respects internal differences, as Yockey and Lowell have proposed.

If they can manage that, I will take them seriously.

I will take ethnonationalists seriously if they accept responsibility for two world wars that wrecked the White world and if they can explain why China should take Flanders seriously.

The Fraudster Twins

Tweedledee and Tweedledumber.

Keep in mind when reading this that Durocher has just published at Counter-Currents labeling science as “profane.”  I mean, this guy Durocher – just like Silver – is openly mocking Der Movement, and really pushing to see how far he can go and get away with being glaringly inconsistent in posts from one site to the next.  Taking into account what else he’s been getting away with (*), I’d say he can go far indeed.  None of the “movement” blockheads, with the refined sensitivity of a pile of bricks, will ever notice.

Speaking of Silver, we read this gem:

If we’re going through, say, oil “too quickly” such that we’ll run out in a hundred years, what difference does it really make if we slow down and only run out in a thousand years?


Err, the rate at which a resource is used up is relevant if an effective substitute for that resource has not yet been identified, or if implementation of that substitute is not yet practically feasible. True enough, oil is not the best example, as we could, in theory, with current or near-future technologies, utilize nuclear fission power for electricity generation (and sea travel) and use electricity for all ground transportation (air transportation will still pose a problem requiring additional technological innovation). Fission would of course eventually have to be replaced by fusion and other approaches that require additional technological advances.

The caveats about oil as an example aside, the general point still holds: only an idiot would take the attitude that the time to delete a resource doesn’t matter (well, we’re talking about Silver here, so….).

Another point, related to Silver’s other comment on that thread about “the oil is just sitting there so we should use it,” well, yes, but if a resource is going to be depleted, besides needing substitutes, we would also like to know that the resource is being depleted in a manner that optimizes the effectiveness of its use.  Whether or not that has been the case for fossil fuels I’ll leave to the reader to decide.

*I am uncertain whether those hosting the Jekyll and Hyde routine are aware and complicit, or are actually clueless.  With Der Movement, anything is possible.

Durocher Exposed, 9/23/16

Two contrasting posts.

Here Durocher criticizes science as “profane,” endorsing in contrast a religion of “esoteric Hitlerism.”

Here, Durocher immerses himself in population genetics science – with the expected lies and distortions – to promote division within the White race.

So, which is it?  Is science “profane,” or something that you fondle fetishistically to pursue anti-WN agendas?

Similarly, Durocher considers fascism good or bad depending on the whim and context, or promotes mainstreaming one day and radical Hitlerism the next.

The analogies with Silver are striking: both are chameleon-like frauds, with a destructive anti-WN agenda.

 


			

More Than Minimal Daylight

The fraud proven wrong once again.

Silver previously described me as “insane” due to my critiques of Durocher, because as Silver asserted:

But there’s minimal daylight between his own position and Durocher’s, when you get down to the brass tacks. 

Now, I believe that I’ve already outlined the glaring daylight – the solar mass – between my position and that of Durocher, but more data are always welcome. So, let’s see some more on how Silver is – as usual – completely wrong.
Here is Durocher’s latest screed; we can look at relevant excerpts and discern how the “minimal daylight” is far from minimal”:

All militant atheists should be given Darwin Awards.


I am a militant atheist. Now, I’m not offended by Durocher’s comment, any more that am offended by Captain Chaos’ retarded yapping at Majority Rights (“Michael Ravioli”). Nevertheless, can it be admitted that Durocher’s comment, coupled to my extreme scientific-materialist atheism, means that there is indeed a very wide gulf between our respective worldviews?

Logically, all this ends in either World-Judaism and/or Islam or esoteric Hitlerism.


So, if not Judaism or Islam, we all need to believe in gnostic esoteric fantasies, that Saint Adolf, The Man Who Can’t Tell Time, is piloting a flying saucer through the ruins of Atlantis – or is it in the “secret Antarctic Nazi fortress?” – “Hyperborea or Ultima Thule?” – “Mars?”

The advent of agriculture led to a spiritual crisis and religious change, as must the advent of modern technology. We need a new religion. Fascism was an attempt, smothered with hate-filled fanaticism. Late liberalism is a half-orgiastic/half-life-fearing effeminate death cult.


Fascism, according to Durocher, is bad, “smothered with hate-filled fanaticism.” We must have religious esoteric Hitlerism instead. I am a fascist and an atheist who thinks “esoteric Hitlerism” ranks among the most stupid horseshit imaginable. Can a normal and honest person (a category which necessarily excludes Silver) therefore conclude that there is in fact an enormous gulf between the Sallis and Durocher worldviews?  Yes.

But one should not limit oneself to a profane scientific approach.


According to Durocher, science is “profane.” I endorse the scientific approach. Does anyone still listen to Silver?

Eliade is astonishingly optimistic in the film. I guess those 1980s New Age movements and Westerners’ dabbling in Buddhism were hopeful signs? Eliade is convinced that a return to sacred convictions would lead to great existential improvement and to cultural creativity, from poetry to the sciences. (I think he is absolutely right.)


I think Eliade is absolutely wrong. Tell me again how there is virtually no difference between Sallis and Durocher?

Women have a much stronger intuitive sense of health and the good life than men…

I agree with the gamesters that women are child-like, indulging in deception and self-deception; women are in large part responsible for the degeneracy of the modern West. Thus, I 100% disagree with Durocher.

Hence, your modern yuppie gal — though raised on Sex and the City — will go to yoga and earnestly chant an “ohm!” of surprising power. Health and spirit are calling her.


Can anyone familiar with my work and worldview think I would endorse the laughable lunacy of the preceding two sentences?

Obviously men should be coming forward to found a new faith.

Yes, but not a religious one.

We salute you Mircea Eliade, Aryan mystic, loyal in a dark age to the faith of your forefathers.


I laugh at you Mircea Eliade: childish buffoon, loyal to pathetic fantasies because you are too weak-minded to face harsh reality, betraying your forefathers by burying your head in the sand of imbecilic esoterica while race and civilization collapse around you.

Durocher? My opinion of him – rather, the specific Durocher incarnation – is well known, and my critiques are based on an utterly incompatible worldview, not “insanity.”
Readers of this post may agree with me, or they may agree with Durocher, but I would hope that none agree with Silver, who once again is exposed as a liar, a fraud, a mendacious twister of facts, an obvious distorter of reality.

Der Movement in the (der) News, 9/16/16

Two items.


Is Putin’s Russia more repressive than Xi Jinping’s China?
Yet, Republicans rarely use “thug” when speaking about Xi.

Er…Xi is a Holy Oriental, a HBD God that walketh the Earth. Putin is just some dumb Slav. Come now, there’s a big difference! Even the GOP Establishment worships at the Altar of Asia, and why not? What’s the difference between a Derbyshire and a McCain, politically-wise?

Fine. How does Israel regard Putin “the thug” and Putin “the butcher”?

According to foreign policy scholar Stephen Sniegoski, when Putin first visited Israel in 2005, President Moshe Katsav hailed him as a “friend of Israel” and Ariel Sharon said he was “among brothers.”
In the last year alone, Bibi Netanyahu has gone to Moscow three times and Putin has visited Israel. The two get along wonderfully well.

Hey! That’s part of Putin’s “deep chess game!” He’s really an Alt-Right Traditionalist Anti-Semite, and don’t you ever think different!
Prayers, schmayers. More important: What was his cephalic index? Praetorian Guard, break out your calipers!