Category: executive amnesty

Rotten Orange News: Culture Wars

Let’s get it straight.

I realize that the Right is not too bright, but it is still distressing that no one is pointing out the obvious: Trump is engaging in culture wars with the NFL and Columbus Day because he is aware that his base became enraged over Trump’s floating of DACA amnesty and his general betrayal of his voters.  Thus, Trump is trying to distract his base with a sideshow of symbolism; one troubling possibility is that he is trying to shore up his support with his base in anticipation of the next betrayal (with DACA or something else).  So, yes, Trump is “playing 4-D chess” but he is playing against his own supporters, who eventually will find themselves checkmated.

What about the idea of “trading DACA amnesty for immigration enforcement?”  Keep in mind that Trump started to backtrack from “few strings attached amnesty” only after his base loudly complained.  Keep in mind that the “amnesty now, enforcement later” model was completely discredit by the 1986 immigration legislation’s failure to follow through on the promises of enforcement. Keep in mind that there is no reason to hold enforcement hostage to amnesty – DACA amnesty or any other.  If you want to argue that the System won’t do enforcement without some sort of amnesty to “sweeten the pot,” then why doesn’t Trump insist on enforcement first?  Or just hold the line against amnesty and try to support right-wing populists running for Congress in 2018, to garner legislative support for an enforcement-only strategy?

Now, symbolism is important, as it affects morale which in turn affects the willingness of people to defend their interests.  However, symbolism cannot compare to actual accomplishment – getting things don. Celebrating Columbus Day means nothing if America turns Brown; anthem protests in the NFL means nothing is White Americans lose their country.

Instead of getting breathless excited about Trump’s shallow symbolism, how about holding him accountable to fulfilling his campaign promises?

Or is that a bridge too far for the Trump fanboys of the Right?

Advertisements

Rotten Orange News: Protecting the “Dreamers”

Cuckadoodledoo!

Read this.

The Trump administration is leaving in place a program protecting hundreds of thousands young immigrants from deportation — one that President Donald Trump had pledged to eliminate…As a candidate, Trump pledged to “immediately terminate President Obama’s two illegal executive amnesties.” Yet as president, he repeatedly expressed empathy with the young participants in the program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA.

The entire Trump administration has been so far a tragicomedy of scandals, ineptitude, tweeting jackassery, Neocon cucking, and constant betrayal of the base.

It is relevant at this point to revisit how Der Movement and EGI Notes have contrasted in their view of Trump.

Der Movement: God Emperor, In Trump We Trust, the last chance for White America, he’s going to stabilize our demographic problems, a new Caesar who may stabilize the decaying System, Roissy’s sweaty homoerotic blind Trump worship.

EGI Notes: vulgar ignorant buffoon, obese moron, idiot, beta race cuck, Der Touchback, Negrophile, cuckadoodledoo!, should be supported only because people’s perception of him will cause racial balkanization, we need to beware of the Man on White Horse Syndrome.

Who was right?  Who was wrong?  Who was right and who was wrong about mainstreaming? Whose judgment should you trust more?

As for Trump, he should reflect that his White American base – you know, the people who actually voted him into office – have their own dreams and aspirations, and it would be nice for a change for someone in power to actually care about that, instead of constantly “expressing empathy” for aliens and parasites.  But what else can you expect from a beta race cuck?

A Rough Back of the Envelope Calculation on Executive Amnesty

Cash or check?
What is the economic cost, based on EGI, to White Americans of allowing 5 million illegals to stay in America rather than deporting them?
The following is a very rough calculation, with lots of estimates and coarse graining, but nevertheless gives a ballpark figure.
Let’s estimate that the average illegal has the genetic profile of a 50:50 mestizo.  Most of the illegals are mestizos. Some may be genetically closer to the White American average (e.g., Irish illegals), some more distant (e.g., Negro illegals).  Let’s call all of that a “wash” and go with a mestizo genetic average.
We’ll use the child equivalents from Salter’s work.  Now, the genetic data from there may be a bit out-dated, and I believe his estimate underestimates the damage, due to genetic structure not being taken into account. But, let’s use Salter’s estimates for our conservative calculations.
The loss of child equivalents to a European Caucasian from an Amerindian is 1.6.  We can halve that for the mestizo situation to 0.8.
Estimates of the “value of a human life” (e.g., for economic risk, etc. purposes) vary – a reasonable average of those estimates is $5 million.
Thus: 5 million illegals x 0.8 child equivalents x $5 million = $20 trillion.
Therefore, each and every White American is owed $20 trillion in compensation for Obama’s executive amnesty.  Of course others are owed similar – American Negroes would be owed trillions of dollars apiece as well, but that’s their problem.
So – cash or check?

Note: that is $20 trillion in today’s currency value.  Therefore, paying off such a debt is impossible: printing hundreds of quintillion dollars will obviously make it all worthless.

You can’t put a price on genocide.

Boycott Delta Airlines

Call for boycott.
Similar to the situation with General Mills, my take is that if Delta Airlines wants to promote policies that hurt White Americans, then White Americans should boycott Delta Airlines. Let them earn their profits off the “Latinos” they so obviously prefer.
This all should tell White Americans the contempt corporate America has for them. Usually, you’d think that businesses wouldn’t take the chance of offending customers. But when it comes to hating Whitey, politics trump profits. Further, they believe – with justification – that Whites will take abuse unlimited and that there actually will not be any harm to profits.
A thought experiment: if a major corporation openly stated that they support the total extermination of Whites, would that cost that business any White customers?  It’s doubtful.

Left vs. Right, 11/21/14

A contrast in attitude.
In light of executive amnesty, some observations can be made. Note that two weeks after a crushing electoral defeat (*), the Left wins a great moral victory, they are the ones celebrating, and the victors of election day are pouting and fuming, and impotently scheming on how to salvage some dignity after having defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. This tells us much about the difference in spirit between the (broadly defined) Left and Right.
Left: always fighting, always on the offensive, never gives up, is never satisfied, is always demanding. When they win, the ask for more. When they lose, they simply dust themselves off and get right back into the fray. They always think big, always pushing. If they are crushed electorally, they will still push their agenda as if nothing happened, and they will never disavow their base of support. They view the other side as the enemy and aim for that enemy’s total defeat.
Right: always surrendering, always on the defensive, easily gives up, is easily satisfied, tentatively asks (never demands) and shrivels in fear if denied. When they win, they declare victory, go home, and do nothing. When they lose, they wallow in despair and aim to change their entire belief system. They always think small, always looking for the easy way out.  If they are crushed electorally, they disavow their base of support (who they not-so-secretly despise) and want to re-invent themselves in imitation of the victors. They view the other side as potential friends and believe that mild debate and the outcome of an election or two can transform implacable foes into bosom buddies.
The Left: eternal winners; the Right: eternal losers. And that will continue until the Right imitates the Left in the ONE thing they should be imitating – the Leftist spirit of fervor, moral crusade, and refusal to ever surrender. For that, we need the radical, revolutionary far-Right, not timid mainstream conservatives.
*Yes, I know: the GOP is a sham opposition, and these mainstream elections are sound and fury signifying nothing (in a practical sense). But here I am talking about attitude, about spirit, about morale. Let’s step back from our Olympian “movement” (or in my case, ex-“movement” and/or Neo-Movement) perspective and look at it the same way as ordinary mainstream White Americans. What do they see?

On Executive Amnesty, Impeachment, and the Movement

What now?
Several brief comments. First, one hopes the White voter understands the utter uselessness of the GOP and of “mainstream conservatism” – fighting and losing battles from decades ago, the paragons of surrender.
This blog endorses impeachment, which is the only way for the Republicans to salvage the slightest microscopic scrap of honor and dignity. Yes, I understand: mainstream politics are useless, the GOP is useless (with or without impeachment), and in the end it is sound and fury signifying practically nothing. And, yes, there would never be a conviction.  Nevertheless, impeachment would have some spiritual and moral value: it is the right thing to do, it sends a message that the beta race is at least making a token attempt to stand up for itself, and, most of all, it is a morale booster for Whites – and here I talk about normal, everyday, healthy-minded “mainstream” Whites and not “movement” Nutzis – Whites who are sick and tired of “their side” always surrendering (*) without a fight, always betraying, always sacrificing honor for expediency, always being “moderate,” always being fearful, always pandering and placating. While it is always best to win – and we desperately need victories – at the very least, if you are going to lose, at least lose with dignity, lose after making an honest fight of it. In that way, your side can hold its head high, retain some morale, and be ready to fight another day. However, rank cowardice and outright surrender – the stock-in-trade of “Conservatism, Inc.” – leads to despair and acceptance of lower-caste, subaltern status. Impeachment may be a lost cause, but it will at least give the “troops” some sense that the battle has been joined,
As regards the “movement?”  Once again, this event, anther victory for the anti-White left, underscores the stupidity and impotence of the Nutzis, obsessed as they are with cephalic indices and gene frequencies, with dubious racial histories and the fantasies of gnostic traditionalism, of tinfoil hat conspiracies and sweaty fetishes.  The Left deals with real world practical issues, they win real-world victories, they make policy that affects our race and speeds us on the road to extinction. And the Nutzi response is esoterica, nitpicking, attacks against fellow Whites who don’t meet some imbecilic standards, obsessions about sub-fractional “admixtures” or cherry picked photographs of celebrities, Hitler as the “man against time” or “above time” or whatever other insanity demented cultists spewed from the fevered swamps of their addled thought processes – stupidity and more stupidity. The Left makes history, the mainstream Right cowers before history, and the far Right onanistically obsesses over an invented comic book version of “history.” Guess who wins, who loses, and who behaves as if they belong in the madhouse.

*White America has had a masochistic relationship with Hispanics for a long time. Instead of insisting that everyone in America speak English, we’ve turned America into a de facto bilingual nation to accommodate aggressive Hispanic demands – why would constant surrender on immigration be any different?