Category: exposing Derbyshire

Fisking Derbyshire, 2/19/18

A brief fisking.

So why was opium smoking so devastating among China’s poor? Adulteration, says Midler. In the extreme, a cheap variety named Hankow Cake contained no opium at all, only sesame seeds.  Midler:

Historians are so hell-bent on blaming the West for everything that went wrong with China in the nineteenth century that they have no room for an investigation into the serious possibility that the nation may have actually poisoned itself.

I would like to see some rigorous historical research on that, but it’s not implausible, and fits very well with the tiresome Chinese bellyaching about the wrongs done to them by foreigners.

How does it differ from Chinese fraud and mendacity today?

Chinese people acknowledge that an individual fellow-countryman may be wicked, but China as a nation can do no wrong.

National self-esteem is of course not an exclusively Chinese phenomenon. We Americans—well, some of us—treasure our “exceptionalism.” Chinese propagandists take it to the extreme, though.

Midler calls it “collective narcissism”  and quotes Lucian Pye, writing fifty years ago:

Nothing can be wrong with the Chinese spirit and their inward identity. All problems must lie outside and therefore be the work of “foreigners.”

But, of course.

Leszek Kolakowski in Main Currents of Marxism described Mao Tse-tung Thought as “a naïve repetition of a few commonplaces of Leninist-Stalinist Marxism.” He allows, however, that Mao was “one of the greatest, if not the very greatest, manipulator of large masses of human beings in the twentieth century.”

So Maoism was a cheap Chinese knock-off of Marxism-Leninism.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal…what else is new for the race of human photocopiers?

Why are so many of us so forgivingly fond of this exasperating, paradoxical, unstable place?  

Pathetic White nerds have Yellow Fever, that’s why.  The “awkward squad” wants to get laid.

Paul Midler quotes from the answer given by Progressive sociologist Edward Alsworth Ross in 1911.

Chinese are extremely likable and those who have known them longest like them best. Almost invariably those who harshly disparage them are people who are coarse or narrow or bigoted. They are not a sour or sullen folk. Smile at them and back comes a look that puts you on a footing of mutual understanding. Their lively sense of humor is a bond that unites them to the foreigner.

Substitute “Chinese” with “Negroes” and Derbyshire would rightly mock this quote, rife as it is with smug moral posturing: all you Chinese haters simply don’t know them.  Excuse my language, but…bullshit.

Ross (1866-1951) is an odd person for Midler to quote in this context.  He would himself be denounced as the worst kind of bigot today. He was a race realist, nativist, and eugenicist who strongly objected to race mixing—so strongly, he was fired from his professorship at Stanford in 1900 for his views.

In 1900!  Well, anyway, what’s the surprise?  A Nordicist HBD type who liked East Asians. Who would have ever guessed?

Much as he liked the Chinese, Ross did not want them settling in the U.S.A. This is a perfectly tenable position, although intolerably shocking to present-day orthodoxies.

Yes, it’s tenable.  Can the Derbyshire family please leave then?

Ross got the likability right, though, and “those who have known them longest like them best.” (Rodney Gilbert may have been an exception.)

Right…the usual SJW song and dance about how “only Whites who don’t know Coloreds are the ones who are bigoted against them.” Derbyshire himself would scoff at that regarding Blacks, why can’t we similarly scoff about Yellows?  I know Chinese very well.  I don’t like them.

And to the further collective credit of the Chinese must be added this: Unlike the nations of the West today, they have no intention of opening up the borders of their nation to tens of millions of foreigners.  Stupidity on that scale is peculiarly Western.

Yes, but having Jews around poisoning the well of sociopolitical discourse does not help.

What’s wrong with us?

We let former illegal alien Dreamer Derbyshire stay in America, bringing in his alien wife and producing mixed-race children.

Here’s the solution to the whole problem.  People who don’t like China and the Chinese should not live in China (likewise, Munro should get the hell out of Romania).  But, please, can we remove all people who posses Chinese descent – part or full – and those married to them from America?

Thank you.


Some Great News! And Some Derbyshire Bits

How did I miss this good news?  Another HBDer and race-mixer bites the dust.

From the tear-stained ramblings of the execrable John Ray:


The last 12 hours have been very tearful for me. After a long battle, Chris Brand has just passed away…Something that upsets me about Chris’s death is that I could have prevented it if I had known earlier what I know now.  He died in an NHS (government) hospital of hospital-borne infections. He got one after another, progressively weakening him until he had nothing left to fight with.  NHS hospitals are riddled with hospital borne infections and Scottish NHS hospitals are said to be worse even than English ones…Curse and goddam the NHS! 

…Chris’s wife, Dr. Shiou-Yun Fang…is from Taiwan…

All I have to say is bless and all praise the beloved NHS!

I know there are some who will say it is “unpleasant and unseemly” to be cheerful over someone’s death.  No doubt this will be ascribed to my “insanity” and/or “bitterness.”  No, it is completely logical. As readers of this blog are well aware, I consider (and with good reason) HBD as an anti-White political movement that delegitimizes White racial nationalism in favor of a pro-Jewish and pro-Asian “cognitive elitism.”  I have, in great detail, analyzed this aspect of HBD; thus, I view a White male HBDer married to a Chinese female as functionally equivalent to a White male traitor who spies for China at the behest of a female Chinese “honeypot” agent.  Question: if Merkel were to suddenly die of an illness, what would the “movement’s” reaction be?  You know very well there would be significant joy in many quarters; to my mind, there is no real difference between Merkel and Brand.  I’m not going to mourn the passing of someone who attacks White racial interests, and supporters of HBD do indeed, in my opinion, attack those interests.

On a side note: if it was so obvious, even to Brisbane Johnny, that NHS hospitals are unsafe, why didn’t Brand’s high-IQ waifu realize this?  And if Ray and Brand were such close friends why didn’t Ray know what hospital Brand was in?  All these folks are such cognitive elitists, and the most fundamentally basic and important facts just pass over their heads.  Are these the betters of all you pro-White activists out there?

This VDARE post is full of all sorts of amusing tidbits (and the great news about Chris Brand of which I was unaware – thank you Mr. Derbyshire for brightening up my day and providing the topic for the first part of this blog post), including an item Derb mentions about which I have some inside information – information of which Derbyshire is quite obviously completely unaware – but of which I’m not at liberty to write about.  On a wholly unrelated (of course! of course!) matter, here’s an interesting book.

Some other items about, or relevant to, Derbyshire:

HBD and Silk Road News

HBD, Derbyshire, and Asians, oh my.

My listener’s speculation that females are more likely than males to die from wounds goes against the general truth that women survive better than men in most lethal scenarios. This is one aspect of the great universal principle that sperm is cheap but eggs are expensive.  Reading accounts of the Donner Party, for example, one is struck by how many more women than men survived.

Yeah, just off the top of my head, I can make two reasonable hypothesis, re: the Donner party.  First, women have smaller caloric requirements than men (at least back then, when the typical female BMI was less than 10,000), and, second, no doubt the “women and children first” white knighters were giving the women first crack access to food and protection from the cold, and the women were not required to do as much work or take the same risks..

Looking this up at Wikipedia more or less confirmed those ideas:

Men have been found to metabolize protein faster, and women do not require as high a caloric intake. Women also store more body fat, which delays the effects of physical degradation caused by starvation and overwork. Men also tend to take on more dangerous tasks and, in this particular instance, the men were required to clear brush and engage in heavy labor before reaching Truckee Lake, adding to their physical debilitation. Those traveling with family members had a higher survival rate than bachelor males, possibly because family members more readily shared food with each other.

But ignorant retard HBDer (redundancy) Derbyshire extrapolates from that that “the general truth that women survive better than men in most lethal scenarios” and that somehow then women would be better suited to survive combat-like scenarios.  Remember, HBD makes you stupid.

Asians once again behaving exactly like Negroes and other “people of color.”  Colored is as colored does.

The Asian embrace of Color.  Asians hate, hate, hate Whites – never forget it.

Related to that truth: Rizzo comes down, thanks to the pan-Colored alliance of Asians and Blacks.

Question: In the Silker dream of Chinese girls with guns guarding the borders of the West, will the Chinese actually facilitate the Black-Brown Global South invasion of Europe?  After all, the Coloreds need to stick together: it’s their rising tide after all!

But, but, but…I thought that southerners like Italians were high in “anxiety” (as well as “neurosis”); now we are told that Finns are high in anxiety because they are cold-adapted northerners?  HBD…the gift that keeps on giving!

Some White folks.

SESTA and the Alt Wrong

The Derbyshire problem.

After historically opposing changes to the Communications Decency Act’s Section 230, web giants came out in favor of a proposed amendment to the law, which would punish a website for knowingly facilitating sexual exploitation.

This would seem to be something that VDARE should be concerned about.  The logic here:

1. Derbyshire is a (presumably paid) blogger at VDARE.

2. Derbyshire, writing for VDARE, publicly questioned why possession of child porn is illegal. This can reasonably be seen as support for its legalization (possession) .

3. Legalization of the possession of child porn can reasonably be seen as increasing the demand for it.

4. Increased demand for child porn will, through the laws of economics, lead to increased supply to cater to that demand – leading to increased sexual exploitation of children (including, but not limited to, sexual abuse, rape, and possibly kidnapping and murder).

5. Hence, one can question whether points 1-4 would be interpreted as that blog running afoul of the proposed SESTA amendment.  I’m not saying it will or it will not, I’m merely questioning the possibility.  For the sake of prudent prevention, it would therefore be helpful for VDARE to disavow Derbyshire and remove him from their group of writers.

Introducing SLC News

SLC = Stupidity, lies, and cowardice, with a “hat tip” to Saint Adolf.

Keeping track of “movement” dishonesty (“movement dishonesty” – a redundant term).

General “movement” dishonesty and misinterpretations of Madison Grant and population genetics.

A problem distinguishing the four cardinal directions.

Hitler took German identity and the existence of a north-south cline within Europe as essentially justifying the subjugation of Eastern European humanity as a whole as expendable inferiors, rather than as potential allies.

You know, North-South is not the same as East-West.  Essentially, Hitler – much kike modern-day Nutzis, despised any group that was not “Germanic” – whether these be from the South of East of Europe.

Speaking of Nutzis, a comment from that article:

Hitler (and Western people in general) correctly considered Russians to be Asiatic barbarians, To this day Russia is ruled by oriental despots;

Why would anyone want to ally with an aggressive and corrupt regime?

Heil Merkel!  The Ultra Aryan!  Heil!  Heil! Heil!

Tin Cup Tuesday!  Happy Holidays, suckers!

The “solution” is to walk around wearing shorts, spouting Norse poetry, blowing on Viking horns (reality or euphemism, who knows?), and letting leftist infiltrators “vet” your meetings.  Even the “Far-Right” in the UK is a joke.

Attorney Glen Allen was fired by the city of Baltimore because of information found in records more than a decade old that were probably stolen from the now all-but-defunct National Alliance. Mr. Allen supposedly attended a conference or bought reading material. Therefore, he was fired as a lawyer simply for associating with a group liberals do not like, not because of any professional misconduct over a career of many years.

Is that the material taken by “Smoky Mountain SS?”  Or another instance of files walking away from the great vanguard of the Aryan renaissance?  The tragicomedy gets better and better.

The tin cup panhandlers at VDARE have it right: Trump – “the last chance for White America” – has turned out to be a cucking, elitist, mainstream Establishment Republican disaster.

While the Beavis-and-Butthead gamesters squeal with delight with every Trumpian Twitter “neg’ the adults in the room realize that Trump is squandering all is political capital and is busy dismantling the base that elected him. Who was it again who labeled Trump – from the very beginning – a “vulgar ignorant buffoon?”

More typical Type I “movement” commentary:

Your comment was good until the last five lines. We here on the European continent are under the onslaught of uncontrolled immigration invasion from Eastern Europe.

The hatred e.g. of Poles or Russians toward Germans and Westerners has the same nature of Blacks’ against White Americans: Poles and Blacks have contributed nothing to modern civilisation so they want to destroy it, out of envy and hatred against its creators.

Slavs who didn’t mix with Asians are White, but they are a small minority.

That’s from a comment left at The Occidental Observer.

That’s a story where all sides are stupid. First, the Alt Right and other precincts of Der Movement elevate ditzy female airheads as “movement” celebrities in a form of sex-based affirmative action to go along with the usual ethnic quotas.  Then these females are over-sensitive as well as vacuous.  Finally, the Beavis-and-Butthead brigade behave like typical juvenile jackasses.  Instead of “trolling” these trollops, just ignore them – you are the ones who created them in the first place by paying attention to them simply because they (presumably) have two X chromosomes, breasts, and a vagina.  You real what you sow.

Yeah, Derb, dumb Whites need to discriminate against smart Asians, or else we’ll have all sorts of resentment against them for taking over the top spots in society.

One question though.  If Asians are so much superior, why do they have to emigrate to White countries?  Why is, for example, the USA so much better that Asians come here?  Why, even a low-IQ greasy swarthoid train wreck like Italy has Chinatown infestations. Why do Chinese emigrate to Italy?  

One would have to think that maybe the Asians are not so superior after all, or they’re just invading, either relieve their population pressure or just for imperialistic urges.

In any case, we must resist them.  ALL of them.  Right, Derb?

A complete inversion of reality:

Greg Johnson
Posted December 14, 2017 at 3:35 pm | Permalink
There’s no affirmative action for women in this movement.
Your anger is misplaced.

Of course there is female affirmative action, in addition to the traditional ethnic-based version.  All these giggling, ditzy female airheads are being elevated solely because of their sex.  

Alt Right: Embracing Evil

It’s the Alt Wrong.

Let’s see:

Is involved in an inter-racial marriage, and supports miscegenation.

Is a despicable HBDer who worships at the feet of Jews and Asians.

An idiot who ignores the demographic facts on the ground and states that there is no existential threat to Whites.

A multiculturalist who supports a multi-racial “stew” society.

A lickspittle philosemite.

Who wants to associate with an Alt Right that includes execrable trash like Derbyshire?  Now, I’m sure that Alt Right defenders will state that the Alt Right cannot control who does or does not identify with this “movement.”  However, the faction had no problem disavowing the Alt Lite, so why can’t they do the same to Derbyshire and the rest of the Alt Wrong?  Is it because they agree with the Alt Wrong? With all the hate toward “boomers” coming from Alt Right Millennials, why do they grovel to a decrepit race-mixing boomer like Derbyshire?  And before I was “banned” from Counter-Currents, that site censored my criticism of Derbyshire’s comments about child porn – criticism that was nothing more than just citing Derbyshire’s own words on that subject!  So it is disingenuous of the Alt Right to just shrug and say that they have no control over Derbyshire and his identification with the Alt Right.

We can contrast all the financial support and meeting invitations and protection given to Derbyshire compared to how a good man like Robert Griffin is essentially ignored (except by TOO; I give credit to MacDonald for giving Griffin a forum).  Contrast Griffin’s wise words with Derbyshire’s self-interested pro-miscegenation rambling.

That VDARE is getting the lion’s share of “movement” donations, and that some of that goes to Derbyshire, is absolutely disgusted.  Not surprising tough.  Not surprising at all.

Let’s delve deeper into this; this is important.  

Let’s consider Derbyshire some more.  Not only is all written above true, and documented in his own writing, but let us not forget: for years, Derbyshire was openly hostile to White nationalism.  He wrote an insulting “hit piece” against Kevin MacDonald (it was when I wrote a riposte defending MacDonald that Derbyshire first came to my attention).  He openly mocked WN’s as “crazy” and “nutty” and “obsessed with racial purity.”  He publicly agreed with the assessment of Amren conference attendees as “latrine flies.”  He challenged critics of his marriage to come to his home so he could greet them “in the appropriate manner” (i.e., an elderly fist in their face, I suppose).  He sided with GNXP against WNs, and had one of the GNXPers at his home (welcomed, not attacked).  He praised the likes of the anti-WN and anti-Salter “Jayman.”  

But what happened when National Review kicked Derbyshire to the curb over his “the talk” article? Guess who it was who eagerly embraced Derbyshire and gave him new life – and money! – to spread his repellent views?  You guessed it – the “movement.”  The same “movement” Derbyshire attacked with relish for years now fell all over themselves to rescue him, including inviting him to address all those “latrine flies” he previously mocked in (digital) print. And, of course, he gets money and more money, supported via VDARE, etc.  And he is praised by “movement” commentators on blog threads.  This anti-WN race-mixer is propped up by the same WNs he’s always despised.

On the other hand, let’s look at how genuine WNs are treated.  Let’s consider this Sallis fellow – a WN for over twenty years, someone who made a major contribution in popularizing Salter’s EGI concept in the “movement” (and defending it against critics), among many other contributions.  Ted has essentially been “blacklisted” by Der Movement for the “crime” of questioning “movement” dogma and for criticizing “movement” leaders and for asserting that these “leaders” should be held accountable for their actions.  The anti-WN Derbyshire embraced; the WN Sallis is persona non grata.

Explanation?  I put forth two explanations, both of which are undoubtedly true.

First, many in Der Movement consider White nationalism as a money-making enterprise, as a way of earning a living (and living well).  They may well be genuine activists, sincere in their beliefs, but they want their money.  Derbyshire was never a threat to that – his attacks could easily be explained away by his Chinese wife and half-Chinese children.  Criticism coming from a twenty plus year veteran of WN is a whole other story, potentially far more damaging.  Let’s quarantine that “infection” before folks start getting the wrong ideas and the shekels stop pouring in.  Yes, there is also the issue of bruised egos among the thin-skinned, but I would think the money is more of a factor here.

But that first explanation does not explain the extent of the discrepancy; it does not explain the fervor with which Derbyshire been embraced, and the alacrity by which Sallis has been, in contrast, blacklisted.  Thus, second, I must invoke the “movement’s” affirmative action program.  Derbyshire – even with his Chinese family connections – is “one of the boys” so years of extreme anti-WN activism is breezily dismissed; Sallis, on the other hand, is an “outsider,” so decades of contributions are flushed down the memory hole before you can even say the words “latrine flies.”

The “rock stars” may not want to hear any of this, but it’s true.  And it’s a damning indictment of their poor character.

Stupid Derbyshire: 10/11/17

Another incoherent quota queen.

Read this nonsense.

Just like Derbyshire debated Taylor on miscegenation (it’s all good, according to the Derb, at least for him, and if you don’t like it, come to his house and he’ll punch you in the face – his essential position), he is now opposing Taylor on racial separation: No Sale, says Derb, it’s impossible, simply impossible.

Hmmm…why would a White male (not man) married to a Chinese woman with half-Chinese children, oppose the idea of people in America actually separating, in a political sense, on the basis of race?  Just like we can productively speculate why such a person would be so opposed to criticism of miscegenation.  Just like we know why he insists the major racial dividing line is Blacks vs. non-Blacks as opposed to Whites vs. non-Whites.  We just can’t acknowledge the bizarre alien nature of Mrs. Derbyshire and the kids now, can we?

Anyway, and predictably, Derbyshire’s self-interested position is incoherent.  He’s all for “freedom of association” don’t you know (so, we can be free to eschew him and his family?), but actual separation is “no sale” because Blacks need Whites


Of that fraction of blacks with something on the ball, all but the most saintly and self-sacrificing will decamp to the nearest nonblack area, as you see happening today across the Mediterranean. Jared’s white enclaves are going to need some very serious border control. His proposed multicultural enclave, where people who want diversity can enjoy it, will get way less diverse really fast. It’ll just turn black.
There is simply no stable solution here. Whites don’t need blacks, but blacks need whites, if they are to have any kind of civilized life.
Jared’s second clip is similarly flawed, even setting aside the mayhem that attended the breakup of Yugoslavia. The racial gap in what was formerly Soviet Central Asia is nowhere near the size it is between American blacks and nonblacks.
So, sorry to Jared and those of his followers who emailed in, but on the matter of separation: no sale.
I do, though, fully agree with Jared on the desirability of striking down all legal constraints on private freedom of association. Forced racial integration is an outrageous assault on our liberties.
With freedom of association restored there would, I believe, be enough voluntary separation to lower the racial temperature and ease us forward to the calm acceptance of reality that the race issue so badly needs.

Look, if Blacks need Whites, and if we cannot have racial separation because there is no way to keep Blacks out (but doesn’t Derbyshire think that Europe can and should prevent the migrant invasion?), then how can we have freedom of association?  Blacks are going to want to live in the “non-Black” areas formed by “voluntary separation.”  How are you going to keep them out?  You can strike down “legal constraints on private freedom of association” but you still need some way to ENFORCE that separation.  If Blacks start coming into Derb’s pristine White-Yellow neighborhood paradise, what’s the solution? Call the police?  The National Guard?  Will law enforcement be segregated as well?

The other incoherent aspect of Derbyshire’s stupidity is his idea that we can have racial peace if we can all just accept HBD race realism and enjoy our voluntary separation and “cool down the racial temperature.”  As if Blacks, with their militancy and low intelligence and inflated self-esteem (all HBD-approved factoids, no?), will just accept being viewed as dumb and violent sub-altern Americans and if they would just accept being eschewed by “voluntary separation.”

Just like Sailer’s citizenism fails because it is no more realistic than racial nationalism (Trump’s citizenism didn’t last past the election) and won’t accomplish anything, Derbyshire’s idea that acceptance of racial differences and freedom of association will solve the race problem is ludicrous.

Derbyshire’s position is self-contradictory, and is reflective of his personal situation, his cognitive deficiency, or both.