Category: exposing Derbyshire

Behold the Hypocrisy: 8/12/17

Outrageous hypocrisy.

Derbyshire writes:

As a Freedom of Association absolutist…

That’s great.  Absolutist. Which means an absolute right to associate, or not associate, with whomever you wish, with no restriction or coercion whatsoever.

But what happens if people decide that they do not want to associate with, live in the same society with, race-mixing Derbyshire and his Chinese wife?  What if people decide that they do not want to live in the same America as the entire Derbyshire clan, including the mixed-race children?

Well, then it seems absolutism descends into relativism:

Derbyshire’s entire argument boils down to this thesis: “Yes, miscegenation is bad, but only a small number of people are doing it, so it’s fine for me to do it. And if you have a problem with that, then come over to my house and I’ll punch you in the face.”  

If “absolutism” stops at someone’s personal self-interests, then it is not genuine absolutism. It is hypocrisy.

Advertisements

Silk Road News: Derb Finds Love

The usual perfidy and stupidity of Asians and those who love them.

Whatever else his (many) faults, Sailer deserves credit for his chronicling of anti-White Asian racial whining.

Colored is as colored does.

Yellow fever race-mixer Derbyshire, he of an unusual marriage, sees no problem in the unusual marriages of others.

My view, heartfelt and frequently stated, is that love is a precious gift, to be cherished and celebrated wherever it may be found.

Well, after all, Derbyshire has publicly questioned why possession of child porn should be illegal, so, yes, it would seem he really believes the part of “wherever it may be found.”

A long time ago, I heard a White woman claim that Yellow Fever is sublimated pedophilia, and there is probably some truth to that, considering the socially awkward White males interested in Yellows and the neotonic character of the Yellows themselves.

Is This the Worst Person on Earth?

Its…John Derbyshire!

Derbyshire cites the ethnic homogeneity of England as one of the major factors in why his youth in the 1950s was so pleasant compared to the multicultural chaos of today. Meanwhile, this vile hypocritical turd – this former illegal alien fraud and self-declared child porn apologist (he himself openly asked on VDARE why possession of child porn should be illegal and opposed the idea of such illegality) – afflicts White Americans with his Chinese wife and mixed-race children.  What about homogeneity for us, hypocrite?

Can you think of a bigger absolute turd than this?  And I note that even Greg Johnson, more mild-mannered than myself on these matters, once wrote:

Derbyshire, by the way, is not a White Nationalist at all. He is a conservative cognitive elitist who is married to a Chinese woman and has two non-white children. Beyond that, he has attacked White Nationalists in the most scurrilous terms, referring to AmRen attendees as “latrine flies” and attacking Kevin MacDonald on the most swinish possible grounds. It is only when this sucking up to Jews and centrists failed to save him from the charges of racism that he began to associate with White Nationalists, who were all too willing to cross his palm with silver. Frankly it is disgusting that the donations of White Nationalists are being sluiced into the pockets of this opportunist.

This Is the Alt Right

We can only hope that Spencer ruined this “brand.”

Some readers may wonder what posts about politics and “movement” stupidities have to do with the ostensible focus of his blog – EGI.  Hopefully, the answer is obvious.  EGI and inclusive fitness are not platonic theories floating around the memosphere, blissfully unconnected to real-world realities.  No, these ideas are intimately connected to the real-world experiences of humans as evolved organisms, and they are also closely affected by politics, by society, by culture, etc.  Further, since the racial nationalist “movement” is, really, the only long-term vehicle for Whites to pursue EGI through acting upon inclusive fitness interests, then what goes on with Der Movement must be, and will be, of prime interest to any blog called “EGI Notes.”

Thus, one reads this and wonders – why make such a big deal over a few seconds of Spencerian stupidity, when we have a piece of filth like Derbyshire representing himself (despite transparent protestations that he is a “club of one”), and being considered by others (including dumb Japanese), as some sort of “Alt Right representative?”

Amnestied illegal immigrant Derbyshire, a race-mixer who actively promotes miscegenation, someone hostile to White nationalism, a proponent of the anti-White HBD cult that is the antithesis to EGI (indeed, Derbyshire himself is the antithesis to Salter), a fan of the anti-White triracial “Jayman” who clumsily attempts to delegitimize White inclusive fitness through incompetent attacks on Salter’s EGI thesis – this creature is a much more worthy target for critique than is Spencer who, with all his faults, is at least trying to work in favor of White EGI.

If the Alt Right is Derbyshire, Brimelow, and Taylor, if people really believe that Spencer damaged the Alt Right brand, then they should be truly and eternally grateful to him for doing so.

Reality vs. Mr. Derbyshire, 11/20/16

More HBD lies.

Read this stupidity.

After 4,000 years of absorbing border tribes and enduring long partial or total conquest and occupation by Turks, Tibetans, Mongols, Manchus, Iranians, etc., any match between the self-identifying Han population of China and the concept of biological race is problematic.

Not problematic at all. Despite some degree of genetic differentiation among the Han Chinese (primarily along a north/south axis, which seems to be a common theme among large population pools, including Europeans), on a global racial basis, as you can see here, there’s no doubt that the Han are East Asian, akin to Japanese and Koreans.

As to why Derbyshire constantly spouts and/or implies falsehoods:

1) He’s an HBDer and HBD is pseudoscientific fraud, lies incompatible with real racial science.

2) It probably also has to do with his pro-miscegenation attitudes, and his constant attempts to normalize his racially mixed family.

Despite our conflicts and disagreements on other issues, Europeans and East Asians can agree that Derbyshire’s lies and agendas need to be rejected and opposed.

Your Daily Dose of Derbyshire, 9/18/16

The usual stupidity.

In his love-fest for Orban, does Derbyshire consider why “the Hungarian authorities” keep on wanting to prosecute Hungarian patriots for offending the poor little brown refugee darlings, whether the “Magyar heroes” are female reporters or male truck drivers?  Oh well, “Orban cannot control everything” but – how about what happened to Richard Spencer?

And a question for Derbyshire: what status to you think illegal aliens and their families should have in the nations they’ve invaded?  Should illegals be amnestied?  Should they be allowed to being foreign wives in?  Should their children have birthright citizenship?  If you answer “no” to any of these questions, I invite you to revisit your own American citizenship status.  You and the family can always renounce your citizenship and move elsewhere, China for example.

Fisking Derbyshire, 9/12/16

Derbyshire: outrageous hypocrite.

This is amazing. All emphasis added:


Professor Watson is a race realist. Nine years ago he was in the news for publicly saying that sub-Saharan Africans have a low average intelligence. He had previously said out loud that Ashkenazi Jews have a high average intelligence.


One wonders what gets Derbyshire more excited: low Negro IQ or high Jewish IQ? One also wonders how Watson was treated by the Jewish community whose intelligence he so slavishly praised. More to the point, how many Jews came to Derbyshire’s defense when National Review kicked him to the curb?

Fiddlesticks to hurt feelings. The world, said Wittgenstein, is everything that is the case. Note he did not say, “everything that does not hurt your feelings.”

Uh huh. Is that why Derbyshire essentially invited “racists” who object to his marriage to come to his home so he can punch them in the face? I quote Derbyshire: 

What after all, should one think of someone who insults a stranger`s wife and children from the safe remoteness of an email link?
(In regard to which, if any of these skulking cowards would like to repeat their insults to my face, it is easy enough to find a person`s street address nowadays. Come show up at my door: I`ll gladly receive you in the appropriate manner.)

Yeah, well, fiddlesticks to your hurt feelings – fiddlesticks, I say! – Derbyshire, you disgustingly vile hypocrite.

It’s true we don’t yet know the full genetic architecture of race differences in intelligence. As human-science blogger JayMan says, though: You don’t need to know the name and job title of every worker in the factory to know the factory produces widgets

Yeah, that’s the same Jayman who went on Roissy’s site to object to common sense observations there with the protest “where’s all the peer-reviewed studies,” who won’t accept actual studies on Italian IQ as opposed to Lynn’s “estimates,” and who uses absurd strawman arguments to delegitimize the idea that people genetically more similar have a greater interest in each other than those more distant (i.e., genetic interests).

Well, I’ve been hanging out with Alt-Right types for a while. I’ve known Jared Taylor for twenty years; Peter Brimelow for sixteen; Richard Spencer I think for eight or ten. All have been guests at my house, I am proud to say.

Thanks Derb for that piece of information. I won’t forget it. Say it ain’t so, Richie!

So what, in my opinion, makes the Alt-Right a distinct thing—not by any means a party, a faction, or a movement, but a collection of souls with something in common?
Here’s my answer:
We don’t like flagrant nonsense in the discussion of human affairs. We don’t like being lied to. We especially don’t like being lied to by credentialed academics like Jerry Coyne.

As per “flagrant nonsense” here is Derbyshire’s laughable (and personally self-interested) defense of European-Asian mongrelization, from the same Taylor debate link as above:

In the particular case of European-Asian matches, Jared and I both recently attended a lecture that included a genetic analysis of the Uighurs, a Central Asian people. They are very precisely half European, half Asian.
I have, as it happens, met more than the average number of Uighurs. They seem to me a fine sturdy people not notably lacking in intelligence or afflicted with any very noticeable personality defects. They are certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.
I say again: Pshaw!

By god, Derbyshire has personally met some Uighurs and they seem like fine folks without any “very noticeable personality defects!”  They are “robust enough” to give the Chinese government problems. Hey, Derb, one can meet Negroes without any “very noticeable personality defects” and they are certainly “sturdy” and “robust enough” to give the American government “a lot of trouble.” Let’s hope your daughter marries one, eh? Pshaw!
If you, dear reader, are tempted to laugh at the childish stupidity of Derbyshire’s ”argument” there, keep in mind that is what passes for typical HBD “analysis.” How is that different, for example, from any Breezy Steve post? Or from Lynn’s “estimates” that just so happen (it’s a coincidence, a coincidence I tell you!) to match his IQ-GDP correlations?

The lies are so flagrant, so outrageously obvious, you’d have to laugh at them—if not for the fact that laughing at them is close to being a criminal offense (*).

Since the entire HBD faction of the Alt-Right (aka the Alt-Wrong) is based on lies and distortions, on lies so flagrant you have to laugh at them, all these guys must really, really, really not like themselves.
That’s OK. Can anyone blame them for that?
*Or having an elderly outrageous hypocrite like child porn apologist John Derbyshire threaten a feeble punch because anyone dares send him emails critical of his family? Hey, Derbyshire, just as you say we are not obligated to approve of the Left’s opinions on race, nor are we obligated to approve of your views on miscegenation, or your participation in it. Nor, dear sir, are we obligated to approve of an English illegal immigrant (**) damaging our genetic interests (you know, what Jayman lies to say do not exist) by bringing a Chinatrix to our country.
**More hypocrisy: Derbyshire opposes illegal immigration and amnesty for illegals, even though he himself is an amnestied illegal. Well, he may say, race matters – he’s of the same ancestry as America’s founding stock, and most current illegals are Third Worlders. OK, great, but if race is important in that regard, then your Chinese wife’s East Asian race is also important, you two-faced weasel. You can’t have it both ways – appealing to White racial sentiments to justify your own amnesty while condemning those same sentiments as “crazy” and akin to “latrine flies” when they question “Rosie.” What an obvious disgusting low-down hypocritical piece of filth this Derbyshire is.