Category: exposing Derbyshire

Dark Tweets

When given lemons, make lemonade.

Those on the (Far) Right complain, with justification, about the hypocrisy of being deplatformed from Twitter and other social media platforms, while those on the (Far) Left are kept on, despite outrageously radical, racially inflammatory, and cheerleading-about-leftist-violence tweets and posts.

Has it occurred to anyone on the Right to create “sock puppet” accounts on these platforms, pretending to be anti-White Colored racists, Antifa supporters, foaming-at-the-mouth SJWs, laughably ignorant race-deniers, etc.?  Push the envelope of leftist insanity (as long as you do not promote violence or any other type of illegality, of course, which goes against the stern pacifism of EGI Notes), have fun, create chaos and balkanization, sow discord and confusion, provoke leftist feuds on the basis of race-ethnicity-sex-sexual preferences- ideology-tactics, etc. Perhaps at some point, the Left will start to become paranoid, accusing each other of being sock puppet trolls. Outrage the Mainstream Right. Stimulate White race consciousness. See how far you can go without getting banned; I’m sure you can go quite far indeed, as authentic leftists prove every day.

The possibilities are virtually unlimited.  This is a form of metapolitical ju-jitsu, turning the hypocrisy of the System against itself. The only question is whether rightist sock puppets can mimic genuine leftist insanity; likely at the beginning, attempts by rightist sock puppets to be intentionally inflammatory will fall short of what actual leftists are posting on a daily basis.  But, practice makes perfect, after all.

 

Maybe someone Der Movement heroes are already doing this; if so, very good – do more, and better.  If not, then this displays, once again, the total lack of imagination of the Far Right.

Other items:

There are some who may question why I am always so harsh to Derbyshire, more so than to other ideological opponents. The answer is that his outrageous hypocrisy grates on me. He has the tiresome shtick of being a “humble working class English lad who longs for the days when England was England,” yet he is proudly married to a Chinese woman, has mixed-race children, and defends miscegenation. He brings his Chinese wife to America, a country in which he was an illegal alien, and then he writes for an American-based immigration restriction website (itself founded by an immigrant, but insofar as I know a legal one).  He calls Amren attendees “latrine flies” and heaps scorn on their beliefs, but then eagerly latches on to Amren and speaks at Amren conferences after he’s kicked out from National Review.  We are supposed to feel bad for Derbyshire over his defenestration from National Review, but he had no problem causing trouble for MacDonald at CSULB with his scurrilous The Marx of the Anti-Semites hit piece on MacDonald (that I vigorously criticized at that time). He always pushes his family in the faces of his readers while calling “race purists” “nuts” – and then when he gets the inevitable email response from outraged readers he threatens them to come to his home so he can greet them “in the proper manner.” I suppose we should give the old boy credit; he has balls the size of Jupiter and Saturn and more chutzpah than all the Jews in Israel combined. However, I still find him annoying.

He’s monitoring the situation!

As regards Spencer on CNN, I have no strong objection in this instance, although generally I am opposed to talking to the press.  It was no great victory either, more or less a “wash.” Interesting that they chose Spencer instead of Taylor, though.  The Far Right needs its own media. Oh, that’s right – “there’s no money.” After all, Derb and Pete have priority, do they not?

It’s laughable when the fetishists undermine their own arguments.   The last WASP on the Supreme Court!  Followed by about how much of a “turncoat” he was.  Bring back Earl Warren!  Actually, Warren was of Scandinavian stock – even better for Der Movement!  Of course, Warren’s name is synonymous with anti-White betrayal – are we surprised?

I don’t know.  If we are going to have a civil war in America over race, another one that is, and it is becoming increasingly likely that in some point in the future we will, then maybe we need to get as many Whites on our side as possible?  In that case, pan-Europeanism is a good idea, and the Nordicist-Fetishist types like Ash Donaldson should be eschewed.  We also need educated Whites on our side; perhaps Der Movement can tone down the anti-scientific “traditionalism,” get out of their “snug hobbit holes,” and put together a mature, future-oriented ideology?

The HBD Agenda

John Reed, Fred Derbyshire….it’s all one.

Question: How is Fred Reed any different than Derbyshire?  They are almost EXACTLY the same, defending multiracialism and miscegenation because of their own personal failings in that regard. Further, they are also exactly alike in making Blacks the main race problem – “look here, it’s dem dere Negroes that are no good, but my favorite non-White group is A-OK.” Even more – both praise the phenotypes of the racially mixed people their own families represent, and heap scorn on anyone who thinks otherwise.  The ONLY difference is that Derbyshire worships East Asians while Reed worships mixed-race “Latinos” (there are of course “Latin Americans” who are of European stock – Bolsonaro of Brazil being one example – but Reed is not really talking about them, is he?). 

The fact that Reed critiques Derbyshire only makes all of this more hilarious.  His attacks against Coulter are just icing on the cake, since she’s a known mudshark herself.  

This is the utter and complete disgrace Der Movement falls into when you have an affirmative action policy; after all, Derbyshire, Reed, and Coulter do have something else in common besides a predilection for inter-racial sex (and, possibly, male-level testosterone levels) – and that “something” is not Eyetalian or Romanian ancestry.

And anyone who criticizes Reed for his self-interested defense of multiracialism and miscegenation without also doing the same for Derbyshire is a rank hypocrite.

But there is a deeper issue here.  Note how most of these discussions – even those from the anti-Reed/Derbyshire side – solely focus on proximate issues.  So, the debate is about physical appearance, the perception of “robustness” and “sturdiness,” the problems or lack thereof of biracial children, “social consequences,” personal preferences and marital bliss (or “measured groveling”), criminality, IQ, etc. – but no real discussion of ultimate interests, of Salterian values, of EGI, of racial preservation, of genetic continuity. Thus, the debate is framed wholly within the HBD framework, it is wholly conducted via the values of HBD, and the value of racial preservation for its own sake is ignored.  IQ is considered, while EGI is not.  This demonstrates the power, the total victory, of HBD within Der Movement, Inc.

How was this victory achieved?  Consider the following. Why do you suppose the HBDers focus so much on intra-European differences?  Why does HBD focus so intensely on the alleged deficiencies of Southern and Eastern Europeans, with a particular concentration on Italians, especially Southern Italians? Why is the only exception to that South/East emphasis harsh critiques against the Irish?  Did you ever consider that the Irish and the (Southern) Italians constitute the main part of the “White ethnic” population of the USA (with Eastern Europeans like Poles making up most of the remainder)?  Did you ever consider how all of this is well designed to impede White solidarity in America – a clear HBD objective?

Further, why the constant harping about “Inner Hajnal” vs. “Outer Hajnal” (almost always in reference to Europe – the idea that Jews and Asians are “Outer” rarely if ever comes up), with the constant reminders that the Irish and the Southern Italians (and Eastern Europeans) are “Outer?”  And why the constant sniping against Frank Salter and EGI?

The HBDers want to replace racialism with cognitive elitism on the Far Right.  They hate and fear White solidarity, they hate and fear pan-Europeanism, they hate and fear the organic solidarity of Europe and of the West, and, most of all, they hate and fear anything that threatens the status of “Rosie and the kids,” Professor Hart, “Razib” and “Godless Capitalist,” and all the rest.  At best, they want White nationalism to be replaced by Jew- and Asian-accepting IQ cognitive elitism; at minimum, they want to ruin White nationalism to make America safe for Jews, Asians, race-mixers, and triracial Jamaican bloggers. They want EGI ignored, they want the genetic distance between Europeans and Asians ignored, they want genetic kinship and genetic continuity to be ignored, and they want only proximate metrics of benefit to Jews and Asians to be considered – with the exception that they’ll also promote any proximate metric that turns Europeans against each other.

The HBDers are not stupid; they have studied Der Movement and they know what buttons to push to further their objectives. They observe the ethnic divides and know how to exacerbate them.  They know how to appeal to Nordicists and other fetishists by bashing those groups the Nordicists despise, and they know how to appeal to the racial vanity of those factions of Der Movement by comparing noble and intelligent “Inner Hajnal” Europeans with the stupid and degenerate despised “Outer Hajnal mongrels.” They’ve been doing this for years, and while these tactics are laughably transparent, they know who and what they’re dealing with, and they know that “movement” reflexes will always win out over rational thought.

Consider “Sallis’ Law.”  How could the HBD strategy be anything other than successful?  So the terms of debate are those of HBD; Yellow Supremacists go from strength to strength while White nationalism goes from weakness to weakness.  And Der Movement’s fetishes, obsessions, and affirmative action program makes all of this possible.

Yes, there are differences and disagreements between European peoples.  But, you know, those are issues for WE to sort out, among ourselves; we should not want or need others, who have malicious intent, to do their concern trolling to set us against each other in bitter squabbles that we cannot win – and that they cannot lose.

Call this “crazy and bitter” and “the paranoid style” all you want, but serious reflection of HBD activity in light of what is written here should illuminate the truth. The bottom line is that HBD is a political movement – politics is activity in relation to power (as Yockey told us) – and the power here is power for Jews, Asians, and White race-mixers.  

Evidence Derbyshire Supports Race-Mixing

Answering lying scum.

A piece of utter filth commenting at Counter-Currents writes:

threestarsPosted May 31, 2019 at 10:43 am | PermalinkYou’re perfectly exemplifying the malaise Quinn is talking about. You’re maliciously strawmening Derbyshire, who NEVER advocated for race mixing with Asians and specifically said so himself on numerous occasions. If we were to shun every member of our movement or ally who was married or had sex with Jewish, Asian, or Indian women we’d be back to the dark days of barely articulate methheads raving about Hitler.

Let’s put aside the interesting statement (perhaps true for the Alt Right) that there would not be many activists left – apart from stupid drug addicts – if we shun race-mixers.  Also, we can put aside the implication that opponents of miscegenation are “barely articulate methheads” (I suppose they are slightly nuts latrine flies as well). Let’s focus on the claim that Derbyshire never advocated for Eurasian mongrelizaiton.

Really?  Derbyshire NEVER advocated for race mixing with Asians?  Of course, there’s different interpretations for “advocated.” Given the sensitivities involved and the gross damage done to racial interests by miscegenation, I consider a defense of, and supportive tolerance of, race mixing, coupled with praising the results of such mixing, to be reasonably equivalent to “advocating” – particularly when the person in question is a race-mixer themselves and represents the miscegenation ideal in the bedroom and the crib.

Let’s consider Derbyshire’s infamous “awkward squad” VDARE post, the one in which he essentially admits that he married a Chinatrix because he is a socially awkward loser with an unpleasant personality.  While it is true that he suggests that mass miscegenation may have “unforeseen consequences” and that opposition to such mass mixing could be legitimate, we note he never defines what level of admixture is too much, and then he proceeds to strongly defend European-Asian admixture, even to the extent of mass admixture that produces an evenly hybridized population. The relevant passages are as follows, emphasis added:

It can, I think, seriously be doubted whether, if there had never been large numbers of blacks in the U.S.A., anti-miscegenation laws would ever have been thought of at all.

As to Jared’s dire warnings about the dangers to mental and physical health faced by the offspring of mixed-race marriages—Pshaw! There are hazards of every kind in human reproduction.

I just last week read in a newspaper article that: “Twin and triplet babies have a five time greater risk of dying within their first year compared to single babies.” We all know that older mothers have higher risk of birth defects. Suicide rates are sensationally higher in some nations than in others, for reasons partly genetic. (The only three nations of Finno-Ugrian linguistic stock are all in the top 20 on that list.)

Should we not then have twins? Should we make our women breed early? Should we shun marriage with Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians?

I suppose some people would say so. Most of us, however, have in these matters what investment advisers call “a high appetite for risk,” and take whatever Nature feels like offering us with the partner we have chosen.

In the particular case of European-Asian matches, Jared and I both recently attended a lecture that included a genetic analysis of the Uighurs, a Central Asian people. They are very precisely half European, half Asian.

I have, as it happens, met more than the average number of Uighurs. They seem to me a fine sturdy people not notably lacking in intelligence or afflicted with any very noticeable personality defects. They are certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.

I say again: Pshaw!

So, first, he stupidly equates race mixing with having twins or triplets or mating with “Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians.”  Then – and here is the crucial part – he utterly rejects Taylor’s anti-mixing attitude (Pshaw!), and cites the Uighurs as an example of a wonderfully sturdy and robust product of very nice half-and-half European-Asian mongrelization.

He then even more stupidly defends miscegenation because the Uighurs are “certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.”  Last I looked the Han Chinese were in absolute zero significant danger from any Uighurs, who they are repressing quite nicely, and any non-significant danger from Uighurs likely has more to do with their religion than with their racial makeup.  And even if Uighurs were real troublemakers – what? – is that a defense of race-mixing?  Gee, racially mixed Blacks and Hispanics in America are causing White Americans all sorts of trouble, so let’s support European-Sub-Saharan African- Amerindian admixture.  I mean, they are all real sturdy and robust, so what’s the problem?

Take home message: Derbyshire is a supporter and a de facto advocator for European-Asian miscegenation, and filthy scum who claim otherwise are LYING to you.

I say again: Pshaw!

Against the Derbyshire Apologists

The defenders of evil are themselves evil.  And “paranoid style” is just mendacious and dishonorable Frankfurt School-style pathologization of people defending White interests against Yellow Supremacism.

Look at this absolute trash – apologia for White-hating Yellow Supremacism, with both the author and one commentator defending the traitor Derbyshire.

Let me state the EGI Notes view: Derbyshire is a bitter enemy of the White race.  The ultimate outcome of his agenda, whatever his motivations, is the subjugation and humiliation of Whites to Asians (whether this reflects his personal life I do not know, but never forget his self-admitted “measured groveling”), with miscegenating Jeurasian mongrelization in play.  From the perspective of this blog and from the viewpoint just stated, supporters of Derbyshire are, de facto if not by motivation,  radical White-hating genocidal lunatics.  Derbyshire’s own personal genetic interests are intertwined with that of East Asia, and that is well known to everyone dealing with this topic, including the author of the Counter-Currents piece discussed here. Anyone who supports and enables Derbyshire is an enemy of the White race and is considered such by this blog.  For godssakes, the man OPENLY agreed with the characterization of Amren attendees (who are by and large more moderate than most WNs) as “latrine flies,” the man OPENLY defended miscegenation, the man OPENLY called “race purists” “slightly nuts.” That was all in writing at VDARE. I don’t know – maybe with the new Counter-Currents-Amren-VDAREUnz Review Jeurasian alliance it is true that the ideological difference between Derbyshire and Counter-Currents is “negligible.” Johnson can answer to that. I do know that the ideological difference between Derbyshire and EGI Notes is a chasm that can never be bridged; I have more respect for an out-and-out Black nationalist than I do for race traitors like Derbyshire.

I am unalterably opposed to ANY scenario – a nightmare scenario – in which Asians live in a White polity: That is anathema.  Any real WN would absolutely refuse such a disaster, they would oppose that horror with every fiber of their being, and they would reject such an unacceptable and atrocious outcome.  Indeed, it would be better to deal with a Farrakhan than a “Rosie,” but, truth be told, it is far better to deal with a “Rosie” than with a Derbyshire.  Better to deal with an honest enemy than with a treasonous one, better a foe who is an easily identifiable racial alien than someone who can slip easily in among the “latrine flies” of a (ostensibly) White racialist conference.  And we must reject the idea that we have anything in common with Asian-loving Judeophilic “cognitive elitists,” “HBD race realists,” and “IQ fetishists.”  We should be looking to Yockey with a Salterian foundation, not looking to Derbyshire with a Lynnian foundation.  Our goal should be an Imperium, not “let’s try something marginally better than the racial status quo.”

This blog has been too mild, too soft, too tolerant, and too accommodating to the likes of Derbyshire and the whole Yellow Supremacist crowd. Traitors who sell out to Asian Supremacism can talk all they want about “paranoid styles” and other shaming memes, but those of us who value White over Yellow will be even more firm and unyielding in out fervent opposition to Derbyshirianism.

Thankfully, I am not alone in this.  I just found a positively sublime contribution from a more sane Counter-Currents commentator, posted after I had written all of the above.  I actually cannot do “emphasis added” for the following, because the entire comment is absolutely on-target, I would have to emphasize the entire thing – it’s one of the best blog comments I have ever read:

LQ Jones

Posted May 30, 2019 at 8:11 am 

More excuses for race-mixer John Derbyshire. A negro married to another negro who otherwise supported our WN objectives would be more palatable and honest than making justifications for Derbyshire, a white man who willfully destroyed his genetic heritage and then has the gall to come to a WN event and promote his “Arctic Alliance” – in the hope that he could convince racially-conscious whites to say, “Hey, right on Derbyshire! Let’s unite mass populations of whites and Asiatics (like you did in your marriage) until they too interbreed (like you also did) and then we’ll all be one big, happy, mixed-race family!” How sickening.

The reality is this: John Derbyshire is far worse than any same-race black couple who supports our movement. For one thing, he has race-mixed and yet he’s met with warm and welcoming arms by the likes of Jared Taylor and others, clearly telegraphing the message at AR conferences that even if you race-mix (at least with Asians) you can still be embraced by the advocates of a white ethnostate – even rise above the average white at such gatherings as you’re showered with effusive praise by WN leaders like Taylor and others for being such “a really great guy!” What disheartening insanity.

In a world of justice, John Derbyshire should not enjoy white nationalist camaraderie. No, Virginia, he should not. Instead, he should be shunned and condemned for his racial betrayal. That those at AR conferences are not doing so only serves to expose just how deep the rot actually is….

Yes, sir.  The rot is indeed deep.  Any sane and reasonable “White advocate” should shun the likes of Derbyshire.  But the rot actually goes deeper than what even this commentator says.  Not only is race-mixer and miscegenation-promoter Derbyshire celebrated and given a forum, but he’s placed above activists of Southern and Eastern European descent.  In other words, a race-mixing Englishman who is on record openly insulting attendees of the conference he himself now attends (because National Review shunned him in a manner that WNs refuse to do) is placed at a higher level than, say, those horribly admixed low-IQ Eyetalians and those horrifically non-Western hora-dancing Romanians.  The pecking order is well established.  Derbyshire above Codreanu!  And as regards Traditionalist Hero Julius Evola?  Come on!  Don’t you know his ancestry?  He couldn’t hold Derbyshire’s chopsticks!

Getting back to Derbyshire…he made his choices in life.  He openly admitted, in writing, to be a socially awkward male – quoting his own mother in that regard (”awkward squad”) – implicitly admitting to the stereotype that it’s the “can’t get a White woman semi-autistic White omega males” who race-mix with Asiatic “females.” So how does that place an obligation on the rest of us to accept “exotics,” to accept “some spice in the stew?”  Why does race-mixing have to be acceptable?  Because Derbyshire is a “really great guy” who invited Taylor to his home to eat food Derbyshire’s Chinese wife made “with her own hands” as Taylor wrote (As opposed to what – with her own feet?  Or that it wasn’t just some cheap Chinese takeout?)?  Why do we have to accept nonsense like “the Arctic Alliance” at an allegedly pro-White conference just because Der Movement’s affirmative action policy is so well established that “one of the boys” is put forth as a “leader” despite committing what Strom rightfully calls genocide?

What a subpar debate about the EU. Spencer’s heart is in the right place (his brain is another matter entirely), while the smirking Frog-Canadian is absolutely stupid and juvenile. And the incoherent woman intermittently intruding like a deranged troll…my god. One would expect better from a podcast put together by middle school students

Look, the question is not if the EU as it currently exists is good. It is obviously not, and I supported Brexit for the same reason I supported Trump – as a protest, as a disruption, as a destabilizing force.  But the idea of a greater European state – one that is run by our side, NOT by Merkel and Macron – is sound (with federalism, as Spencer indicated).

All Spencer had to say – clearly and directly – was that he was NOT talking about an EU and a European army led by the likes of Merkel and Macron, but led by racial nationalists.

The fact that neither of these heroes – experienced podcasters – can just clearly and simply differentiate between the EU as is and a future nationalist European federation is astonishing.  All that blather could have been cleared up by one simple sentence.  Pathetic.

Even More Winning

Endless losing.

The two things I bothered to listen to here was the Anarcho-Tyranny airport incident and about the Derbyshire Yellow Supremacist speech.

The major point not mentioned in regard to Anarcho-Tyranny is that this harassment of people on the Right is taking place under the regime of The God Emperor Trump. Johnson’s “sincere” Trump, the avatar of White demographics, is presiding over a Radical Left Dystopia in which WNs are persecuted by his DOJ, banned from traveling, harassed, deplatforming, physically attacked in the streets, etc. Don’t ever admit that you were wrong, Greg, you wouldn’t want to mar your impressive record of zero self-awareness and zero accountability.

About the “remarkably witty” Derbyshire, at least they have it right that Derbyshire’s talk had “the least amount of substance” and that Derbyshire’s “Arctic Alliance” “sounds like his marriage” and that they are confused about “what is the purpose” of it all.  Johnson is correct that Derbyshire is an “IQ supremacist and cognitive elitist” – and further, that cognitive elitism is extremely dangerous in that high-IQ immigrants are more of a danger for displacing natives and for miscegenation (the HBD plan).

Johnson is wrong that Asian immigration is a “small demographic problem” – China has long been one of the leading sources of legal immigration to the US; Korea provides many invaders as well.

Derbyshire “wasted a slot” – blame Taylor for that.

Morgan’s anti-pan-Europeanism is disgusting and hypocritical. Can you please leave Hungary, since you are not an ethnic Hungarian?  Anglo-Saxons are not quite ethnically and culturally congruent with Hungarians from the ethnonationalist perspective you espouse. Of course, as I’ve talked about in the past, when these guys talk about ethnonationalism they really mean ethnocolonialism. Morgan living in someone else’s nation while pontificating about the virtues of narrow ethnonationalism; Munro living in Romania with sexual access to a Romanian woman (“wife”) while telling us how horrid Romanians are, Farrell living in Italy with sexual access to his Italian “wife” while shaking his head sadly at woppish ineptitude, Deasy visiting Bulgaria and regaling us with the deficiencies of Bulgarians and how their faces “take getting used to.” You see, our betters will live among us like feudal lords, telling us how bad it will be for there to be any political equity and cooperation among our peoples. Sort of like those British who love Brexit but who for some reason move to Spain, southern France, Bulgaria, Italy, Greece, etc. while “Commonwealth” Negroes and Pakis flood into the UK (as long as it is not Poles, A-OK).

So much winning.

A bit of Negritude.

More and more winning.

Do Not Legitimize or Normalize Genocide

Promoting White genocide in the unlikeliest of places – or is it really unlikely?

Considering Strom’s piece about race-mixing, an important point is that each case of race-mixing, by its very existence and acceptance, is a form of legitimization and normalization of the practice, which Strom rightfully equates with the promotion of White genocide.

And acceptance there certainly is – not only by the System, the Society at large, but by important factions of Der Movement itself.  Consider Derbyshire. He is not only an enthusiastic race-mixer, but has written for VDARE defending the practice and attacking its critics in scurrilous terms – you see, according to him, all you “race purists” out there are “slightly nuts.”  Very well.  Is he is shunned by Der Movement?  Hardly!  Instead, he is an honored guest and prime speaker at America’s leading racialist “White advocacy” conference – American Renaissance.  So, if you can be a participant in, and defender of, race-mixing involving Whites, and still be one of the leading lights of Alt Right-style racial activism, then what consequences are there for race-mixing in Der Movement?  We also have leading Alt Righters who have dated Asians, with one commentator asserting that such relationships are a “rite of passage” for the Alt Right.

That’s certainly some heavy-duty legitimization and normalization, isn’t it?  But then, if we consider the HBD strain behind all these people, then the whole idea of “White racists being OK with race-mixing” is not so unlikely, not so surprising, after all.  Isn’t Sailer’s Jeurasian mongrel race idea the ultimate endgame for HBD anyway?

Derbyshire embraced; critics of Derbyshire scorned.  White genocide embraced; opponents of White genocide rejected. Jeurasianism embraced; White preservationism ignored.

Meanwhile, in Merry Old England… as TOO would say: Cue the Vikings.  Not so much any more, eh?

Question – if “White advocates” look with dismay at the racial degeneration of the “Royal Family,” why are they accepting of Derbyshire?  What is it?  The unprincipled exception due to personal friendship?  The fact that “the Derb” is “one of the boys” and those ties are stronger than the extinction of Derbyshire’s English lineage?  That the Alt Wrong is so hysterically pro-Asian that they’ll make an exception in that case?  Expediency – the think that Derbyshire’s shallow and boring drivel is somehow “useful” for “the cause” and so they look the other way regarding his personal failings?  Or all of these combined?  Or something else entirely?

According to Taylor, Johnson, and McCulloch we are winning!  So much winning!  I’ve been involved with “this thing of ours” since the mid-90s, and I can tell you that things have never been worse. Any honest person will tell you that the facts-on-the-ground reality is that racialism in America is at an all-time low.  This after all the promise of 2016’s foray into right-wing populism. But, hey, keep on sending in those “D’Nations” so that your fearless leaders can travel internationally (that is, when they aren’t banned from doing so) and go to the movies, while enjoying dat dere Blue State lifestyle. After all, we got to keep them well-stocked in comfy lawn chairs!

Strom Contra Derbyshire

The superiority of WN 1.0 is shown once again.

Read this, emphasis added:

It means that the majority of racial mixing involves the destruction of the White race – Whites mating with Asians, Whites mating with Blacks, Whites mating with Arabs or Jews, Whites mating with mestizos, Whites mating with the racially unclassifiable. You have seen it in your shopping centers. You have seen it in the street. You are a witness to genocide. You are seeing it before your very eyes every day. What are you doing about it? If you do not at least speak out against it, you are allowing yourself to be complicit in this horrible crime.

The crime is racemixing. It is a worse crime than murder – far worse.

For when you commit murder you kill one man, you end one life, you tragically injure one family and circle of friends. When you commit murder, if your victim has had no children you do cut off the potential existence of one small branch of the race’s future.

But when you commit the crime of racial mixing you are participating in genocide. The probable effect and possible motive for your act is to bring into the world hybrid young, who will not be clearly of one race or the other and which will, by their very existence, increase the probability of future racial mixing and dilute both the gene pool and the sense of identity of the next generation of White children.

Derbyshire is even worse than what Strom describes here, since he not only has race-mixed, but has written for VDARE defending race-mixing and asserting that “racial purists” are mentally unstable (“slightly nuts”).

When will people like Strom denounce Derbyshire as this blog does? After all, Kevin, aren’t you being complicit to White genocide by not openly denouncing the fact that Derbyshire is being given a forum to disseminate his views on forums of the Far Right?

On another, perhaps not completely unrelated note:

This finding has been observed most strongly in Der Movement, I suppose.