Category: exposing Derbyshire

Alt Right: Embracing Evil

It’s the Alt Wrong.

Let’s see:

Is involved in an inter-racial marriage, and supports miscegenation.

Is a despicable HBDer who worships at the feet of Jews and Asians.

An idiot who ignores the demographic facts on the ground and states that there is no existential threat to Whites.

A multiculturalist who supports a multi-racial “stew” society.

A lickspittle philosemite.

Who wants to associate with an Alt Right that includes execrable trash like Derbyshire?  Now, I’m sure that Alt Right defenders will state that the Alt Right cannot control who does or does not identify with this “movement.”  However, the AltRight.com faction had no problem disavowing the Alt Lite, so why can’t they do the same to Derbyshire and the rest of the Alt Wrong?  Is it because they agree with the Alt Wrong? With all the hate toward “boomers” coming from Alt Right Millennials, why do they grovel to a decrepit race-mixing boomer like Derbyshire?  And before I was “banned” from Counter-Currents, that site censored my criticism of Derbyshire’s comments about child porn – criticism that was nothing more than just citing Derbyshire’s own words on that subject!  So it is disingenuous of the Alt Right to just shrug and say that they have no control over Derbyshire and his identification with the Alt Right.

We can contrast all the financial support and meeting invitations and protection given to Derbyshire compared to how a good man like Robert Griffin is essentially ignored (except by TOO; I give credit to MacDonald for giving Griffin a forum).  Contrast Griffin’s wise words with Derbyshire’s self-interested pro-miscegenation rambling.

That VDARE is getting the lion’s share of “movement” donations, and that some of that goes to Derbyshire, is absolutely disgusted.  Not surprising tough.  Not surprising at all.


Let’s delve deeper into this; this is important.  


Let’s consider Derbyshire some more.  Not only is all written above true, and documented in his own writing, but let us not forget: for years, Derbyshire was openly hostile to White nationalism.  He wrote an insulting “hit piece” against Kevin MacDonald (it was when I wrote a riposte defending MacDonald that Derbyshire first came to my attention).  He openly mocked WN’s as “crazy” and “nutty” and “obsessed with racial purity.”  He publicly agreed with the assessment of Amren conference attendees as “latrine flies.”  He challenged critics of his marriage to come to his home so he could greet them “in the appropriate manner” (i.e., an elderly fist in their face, I suppose).  He sided with GNXP against WNs, and had one of the GNXPers at his home (welcomed, not attacked).  He praised the likes of the anti-WN and anti-Salter “Jayman.”  


But what happened when National Review kicked Derbyshire to the curb over his “the talk” article? Guess who it was who eagerly embraced Derbyshire and gave him new life – and money! – to spread his repellent views?  You guessed it – the “movement.”  The same “movement” Derbyshire attacked with relish for years now fell all over themselves to rescue him, including inviting him to address all those “latrine flies” he previously mocked in (digital) print. And, of course, he gets money and more money, supported via VDARE, etc.  And he is praised by “movement” commentators on blog threads.  This anti-WN race-mixer is propped up by the same WNs he’s always despised.


On the other hand, let’s look at how genuine WNs are treated.  Let’s consider this Sallis fellow – a WN for over twenty years, someone who made a major contribution in popularizing Salter’s EGI concept in the “movement” (and defending it against critics), among many other contributions.  Ted has essentially been “blacklisted” by Der Movement for the “crime” of questioning “movement” dogma and for criticizing “movement” leaders and for asserting that these “leaders” should be held accountable for their actions.  The anti-WN Derbyshire embraced; the WN Sallis is persona non grata.


Explanation?  I put forth two explanations, both of which are undoubtedly true.


First, many in Der Movement consider White nationalism as a money-making enterprise, as a way of earning a living (and living well).  They may well be genuine activists, sincere in their beliefs, but they want their money.  Derbyshire was never a threat to that – his attacks could easily be explained away by his Chinese wife and half-Chinese children.  Criticism coming from a twenty plus year veteran of WN is a whole other story, potentially far more damaging.  Let’s quarantine that “infection” before folks start getting the wrong ideas and the shekels stop pouring in.  Yes, there is also the issue of bruised egos among the thin-skinned, but I would think the money is more of a factor here.


But that first explanation does not explain the extent of the discrepancy; it does not explain the fervor with which Derbyshire been embraced, and the alacrity by which Sallis has been, in contrast, blacklisted.  Thus, second, I must invoke the “movement’s” affirmative action program.  Derbyshire – even with his Chinese family connections – is “one of the boys” so years of extreme anti-WN activism is breezily dismissed; Sallis, on the other hand, is an “outsider,” so decades of contributions are flushed down the memory hole before you can even say the words “latrine flies.”


The “rock stars” may not want to hear any of this, but it’s true.  And it’s a damning indictment of their poor character.

Advertisements

Stupid Derbyshire: 10/11/17

Another incoherent quota queen.

Read this nonsense.

Just like Derbyshire debated Taylor on miscegenation (it’s all good, according to the Derb, at least for him, and if you don’t like it, come to his house and he’ll punch you in the face – his essential position), he is now opposing Taylor on racial separation: No Sale, says Derb, it’s impossible, simply impossible.

Hmmm…why would a White male (not man) married to a Chinese woman with half-Chinese children, oppose the idea of people in America actually separating, in a political sense, on the basis of race?  Just like we can productively speculate why such a person would be so opposed to criticism of miscegenation.  Just like we know why he insists the major racial dividing line is Blacks vs. non-Blacks as opposed to Whites vs. non-Whites.  We just can’t acknowledge the bizarre alien nature of Mrs. Derbyshire and the kids now, can we?

Anyway, and predictably, Derbyshire’s self-interested position is incoherent.  He’s all for “freedom of association” don’t you know (so, we can be free to eschew him and his family?), but actual separation is “no sale” because Blacks need Whites

Derbyshire:

Of that fraction of blacks with something on the ball, all but the most saintly and self-sacrificing will decamp to the nearest nonblack area, as you see happening today across the Mediterranean. Jared’s white enclaves are going to need some very serious border control. His proposed multicultural enclave, where people who want diversity can enjoy it, will get way less diverse really fast. It’ll just turn black.
There is simply no stable solution here. Whites don’t need blacks, but blacks need whites, if they are to have any kind of civilized life.
Jared’s second clip is similarly flawed, even setting aside the mayhem that attended the breakup of Yugoslavia. The racial gap in what was formerly Soviet Central Asia is nowhere near the size it is between American blacks and nonblacks.
So, sorry to Jared and those of his followers who emailed in, but on the matter of separation: no sale.
I do, though, fully agree with Jared on the desirability of striking down all legal constraints on private freedom of association. Forced racial integration is an outrageous assault on our liberties.
With freedom of association restored there would, I believe, be enough voluntary separation to lower the racial temperature and ease us forward to the calm acceptance of reality that the race issue so badly needs.

Look, if Blacks need Whites, and if we cannot have racial separation because there is no way to keep Blacks out (but doesn’t Derbyshire think that Europe can and should prevent the migrant invasion?), then how can we have freedom of association?  Blacks are going to want to live in the “non-Black” areas formed by “voluntary separation.”  How are you going to keep them out?  You can strike down “legal constraints on private freedom of association” but you still need some way to ENFORCE that separation.  If Blacks start coming into Derb’s pristine White-Yellow neighborhood paradise, what’s the solution? Call the police?  The National Guard?  Will law enforcement be segregated as well?

The other incoherent aspect of Derbyshire’s stupidity is his idea that we can have racial peace if we can all just accept HBD race realism and enjoy our voluntary separation and “cool down the racial temperature.”  As if Blacks, with their militancy and low intelligence and inflated self-esteem (all HBD-approved factoids, no?), will just accept being viewed as dumb and violent sub-altern Americans and if they would just accept being eschewed by “voluntary separation.”

Just like Sailer’s citizenism fails because it is no more realistic than racial nationalism (Trump’s citizenism didn’t last past the election) and won’t accomplish anything, Derbyshire’s idea that acceptance of racial differences and freedom of association will solve the race problem is ludicrous.

Derbyshire’s position is self-contradictory, and is reflective of his personal situation, his cognitive deficiency, or both.

Behold the Hypocrisy: 8/12/17

Outrageous hypocrisy.

Derbyshire writes:

As a Freedom of Association absolutist…

That’s great.  Absolutist. Which means an absolute right to associate, or not associate, with whomever you wish, with no restriction or coercion whatsoever.

But what happens if people decide that they do not want to associate with, live in the same society with, race-mixing Derbyshire and his Chinese wife?  What if people decide that they do not want to live in the same America as the entire Derbyshire clan, including the mixed-race children?

Well, then it seems absolutism descends into relativism:

Derbyshire’s entire argument boils down to this thesis: “Yes, miscegenation is bad, but only a small number of people are doing it, so it’s fine for me to do it. And if you have a problem with that, then come over to my house and I’ll punch you in the face.”  

If “absolutism” stops at someone’s personal self-interests, then it is not genuine absolutism. It is hypocrisy.

Silk Road News: Derb Finds Love

The usual perfidy and stupidity of Asians and those who love them.

Whatever else his (many) faults, Sailer deserves credit for his chronicling of anti-White Asian racial whining.

Colored is as colored does.

Yellow fever race-mixer Derbyshire, he of an unusual marriage, sees no problem in the unusual marriages of others.

My view, heartfelt and frequently stated, is that love is a precious gift, to be cherished and celebrated wherever it may be found.

Well, after all, Derbyshire has publicly questioned why possession of child porn should be illegal, so, yes, it would seem he really believes the part of “wherever it may be found.”

A long time ago, I heard a White woman claim that Yellow Fever is sublimated pedophilia, and there is probably some truth to that, considering the socially awkward White males interested in Yellows and the neotonic character of the Yellows themselves.

Is This the Worst Person on Earth?

Its…John Derbyshire!

Derbyshire cites the ethnic homogeneity of England as one of the major factors in why his youth in the 1950s was so pleasant compared to the multicultural chaos of today. Meanwhile, this vile hypocritical turd – this former illegal alien fraud and self-declared child porn apologist (he himself openly asked on VDARE why possession of child porn should be illegal and opposed the idea of such illegality) – afflicts White Americans with his Chinese wife and mixed-race children.  What about homogeneity for us, hypocrite?

Can you think of a bigger absolute turd than this?  And I note that even Greg Johnson, more mild-mannered than myself on these matters, once wrote:

Derbyshire, by the way, is not a White Nationalist at all. He is a conservative cognitive elitist who is married to a Chinese woman and has two non-white children. Beyond that, he has attacked White Nationalists in the most scurrilous terms, referring to AmRen attendees as “latrine flies” and attacking Kevin MacDonald on the most swinish possible grounds. It is only when this sucking up to Jews and centrists failed to save him from the charges of racism that he began to associate with White Nationalists, who were all too willing to cross his palm with silver. Frankly it is disgusting that the donations of White Nationalists are being sluiced into the pockets of this opportunist.

This Is the Alt Right

We can only hope that Spencer ruined this “brand.”

Some readers may wonder what posts about politics and “movement” stupidities have to do with the ostensible focus of his blog – EGI.  Hopefully, the answer is obvious.  EGI and inclusive fitness are not platonic theories floating around the memosphere, blissfully unconnected to real-world realities.  No, these ideas are intimately connected to the real-world experiences of humans as evolved organisms, and they are also closely affected by politics, by society, by culture, etc.  Further, since the racial nationalist “movement” is, really, the only long-term vehicle for Whites to pursue EGI through acting upon inclusive fitness interests, then what goes on with Der Movement must be, and will be, of prime interest to any blog called “EGI Notes.”

Thus, one reads this and wonders – why make such a big deal over a few seconds of Spencerian stupidity, when we have a piece of filth like Derbyshire representing himself (despite transparent protestations that he is a “club of one”), and being considered by others (including dumb Japanese), as some sort of “Alt Right representative?”

Amnestied illegal immigrant Derbyshire, a race-mixer who actively promotes miscegenation, someone hostile to White nationalism, a proponent of the anti-White HBD cult that is the antithesis to EGI (indeed, Derbyshire himself is the antithesis to Salter), a fan of the anti-White triracial “Jayman” who clumsily attempts to delegitimize White inclusive fitness through incompetent attacks on Salter’s EGI thesis – this creature is a much more worthy target for critique than is Spencer who, with all his faults, is at least trying to work in favor of White EGI.

If the Alt Right is Derbyshire, Brimelow, and Taylor, if people really believe that Spencer damaged the Alt Right brand, then they should be truly and eternally grateful to him for doing so.

Reality vs. Mr. Derbyshire, 11/20/16

More HBD lies.

Read this stupidity.

After 4,000 years of absorbing border tribes and enduring long partial or total conquest and occupation by Turks, Tibetans, Mongols, Manchus, Iranians, etc., any match between the self-identifying Han population of China and the concept of biological race is problematic.

Not problematic at all. Despite some degree of genetic differentiation among the Han Chinese (primarily along a north/south axis, which seems to be a common theme among large population pools, including Europeans), on a global racial basis, as you can see here, there’s no doubt that the Han are East Asian, akin to Japanese and Koreans.

As to why Derbyshire constantly spouts and/or implies falsehoods:

1) He’s an HBDer and HBD is pseudoscientific fraud, lies incompatible with real racial science.

2) It probably also has to do with his pro-miscegenation attitudes, and his constant attempts to normalize his racially mixed family.

Despite our conflicts and disagreements on other issues, Europeans and East Asians can agree that Derbyshire’s lies and agendas need to be rejected and opposed.