Category: foreign policy

Odds and Ends, 12/4/19

Various issues.

Greg Johnson describes how he attacks those on the Right:

principled intellectual disagreement vs. personal invective (It is not “divisive” to sincerely disagree with someone.)
defending oneself from attacks vs. launching attacks on others
calling out people for harming the movement vs. pointless personal vendettas

The problem is that this is exactly what Ted Sallis does, but when Ted does it, he’s “crazy and bitter” and to be “banned.”

Type Is on the march.

Zaremski was an emergency medical technician who frequented white supremacist forums online and had a trove of neo-Nazi literature. He was caught only because he sent a photo of his ex-girlfriend wearing parts of a Nazi uniform to her employer, officials said…He also affixed a “Right Wing Death Squad” patch to his EMT jacket.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Look at this naïve buffoon presenting ancestry testing results to the decimal point for Gabbard, including percentages of 3.8, 1.1, and 0.8.  Depending on the test and the parental populations used, I would question even the percentages in the 20s.

Let it not be said that the “movement’s” affirmative action “leadership” does not come up with brilliant ideas – this is one!  Heil Der Movement!  Heil!  

No, actually the Alt Right should just continue on the glorious path already established.

Andrew Fraser wanna-be and “Wilmot” lover Morris the Liar is back again with the same old shtick. Question – wasn’t it the grand old WASP foreign policy establishment that gave us American involvement in WWI and WWII (and don’t start braying about “Pearl Harbor” with respect to the latter, with all the grand work Der Movement has done over the years uncovering the FDR administration’s perfidy regarding that)?

Oh you’ll say – the Jews were manipulating there.  If that is the case, as far back as WWI, then when did the USA have an authentically Humphrey Irelandish foreign policy apparatus?  The Spanish American War perhaps, brought to us by grand fellows like Hearst (journalism leading foreign policy) and the reason we have so many Puerto Ricans and Filipinos in American today.  What?  Do we gave to go back to Polk and the Mexican American War?  Or perhaps Jefferson and the Louisiana Purchase?  Or Washington’s Farewell Address?

Der Movement likes to pontificate, but cannot back up all of the hot air with historical reality.

If you believe that in the past that American foreign policy was run by the “Majority,” then this is relevant.  Fiction mirroring reality. After all, if Der Movement loves the Pesci scene so much, they can also consider the content of the remainder of the movie as well.

Now, I did state:

A case can be made that folks like the Wilsons founded and built America and so they have the right to pull the strings…

Very well.  But if so, at least have the honesty to admit when the Wilsons screw things up, instead of pretending those were halcyon days – the Golden Age of foreign affairs from which we’ve sadly fallen to the Yogi Bear (“Kali Yuga”). But then, the concept of accountability is not very well accepted by Der Movement and its “leadership,” is it?

My response to this nonsense is this EGI Notes post.  Fact is, Rushton was exposed as a fraud and a personal hypocrite by a fellow HBDer.  That Johnson blithely ignores the facts about his hero and continues to peddle him as some sort of admirable figure is unfortunate but not (to me) surprising.

Good Sense on Putin

Counter Currents commentator
Emphasis added (and a few corrections made):
Hadrian
Posted December 10, 2014 at 8:50 pm |
“1. You westerners are looking for a messiah. A redemption from zog. Someone to save you -Putin didn’t and now you’re angry on him.”
If you’re a Russian, you too should be “looking for a messiah.” Your birth rates are plummeting, your male population is sickly due to rampant alcoholism and smoking, your women are sold around the world as sex slaves, and your country is in the hands of largely Jewish billionaires who hate you.
“2. I see you all here are Nazi sympathizers.
No mention to the crimes of Nazi army, the rapes etc.”

Any “crimes” the National Socialists committed during the invasion of Russia were no different or numerous from what any other army committed in any other war. The only armies that committed systematic murders, rapes, and atrocities on the explicit orders of their commanders were all Allied armies.
The German army mostly adhered to the Geneva Convention, which is something the USSR did not even formally agree to. The Germans even had the Red Cross travel with them as they moved east. People across the Baltic nations, Ukraine, and even Russia greeted them as liberators. As for the millions of Bolshevik dead, it was mostly due to Stalin’s government that was waging a terroristic war on the Russian populace while the Germans were advancing.
“33. Your cosmotheasis, your world view , is anglosaxonic, thus, you criticize Putin via anglosaxonic eyes of course. Now, your racism is that you demand , the leaders to be like your anglosaxonic mentality in order to like them. Well, Putin, isn’t anglosaxon. Russians aren’t anglosaxon. They can be friendly or hostile at times but arent like you. And this is smth that you have to understand.”

Putin doesn’t have to be Anglo-Saxon. He can be a good Slav and promote policies that help Russia’s Slavic populace and bring the Jewish criminals to justice for their abominable crimes against Russia and surrounding Slavic nations in the past century. He can stop whining about the Holocaust and promote understanding of the nature of Bolshevism, its Jewish roots, and its death toll of about 60 million Slavs. He can apologize to Germany, Hungary, Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, and many other nations for the crimes of the Soviet regime and show some solidarity with them. He can use his intelligence agencies to root out the Jewish mafia and their role in sex slavery. He can end Muslim immigration into Russia and promote the Slavic birth rate.
Putin does none of this. If you’re Russian, why do you support him?
“The extinction and degeneration of whites is at the gates. We agree on that. But instead of moaning and being hostile to leaders who look for sovereignty, isn’t the way to go. The white survival needs allies and self realization. Bashing instead of creating ties is suicidal and unfortunately will lead to the end that we are all aware of.”
We’re hostile to Putin because he’s a puppet, like any western leader.  There’s nothing sovereign about him.

Has Anyone Else Noticed, 11/20/14

Coincidences, of course.
Back when (a more secular) Turkey was “Israel’s closest ally in the Muslim world” we heard the unending drumbeat of voices demanding that Turkey be let into the EU, that Turks are wonderful, that flooding Europe with Turks will solve all sorts of problems, and it seemed that a cornerstone of American foreign policy was browbeating Europeans into accepting Turkish EU membership.
Today, when (a more Islamist) Turkey has a quite sour relationship with Israel, with real tensions between those two nations, all the “Turkey in the EU” talk has dissipated, “conservative” commentators in Yahoo article comments threads attack Turkey and the Turks, and “concerned” voices question the direction of Turkish society.  All a coincidence, of that we can have no doubt.
I think back to George Bush, Sr. After the first Gulf War, his popularity was sky-high. He and his advisers thought to cash in a bit on that political capital to pressure Israel to make a real peace with the Palestinians, and to cut back on the settlements. I seem to remember some in his government (Baker?) dismissing Jewish concerns with, “they didn’t vote for us anyway,” or something to that effect. Blasphemy! And then – mysterious it all was! – Bush’s popularity started to fade, “experts” started talking about a “coming recession” (a self-fulfilling prophecy, since much of economics is the population’s perception of things), all sorts of negative news coming out, and Bush Sr. was portrayed as “out of touch,” an “aristocrat” who “doesn’t know how to shop at a supermarket,” blah. blah, blah. Under constant withering sniping, and with a damaged economy, Bush went from the political pinnacle to being defeated by Slick Willie in 1992. That will show them uppity goyim who’s boss!