One of Gaslighting Greg’s most annoying memes is to bring up Joan of Arc as a symbol of patriotic female empowerment, against all the “misogynists” in the “movement” of which he is a “leader.” As if, you see, what passes for “female racial nationalist activists” today is even comparable to Joan of Arc – in the sense, I suppose, that an African grass hut is comparable to the Empire State Building.
Let me clarify my position on this matter, in all seriousness. I have no problem with female White racial activists, if – IF! – their position in the “movement” is based on merit, and is supported by serious, productive, and thoughtful contributions. What I oppose is a quota system for women just like we have an ethnic quota system in Der Movement. What I oppose are all of the ditzy giggling Alt Right airheads and all of the low-rent Alt Lite mudsharks who are supposed to be sacrosanct and immune from criticism because they are all budding Joan of Arcs, bolstered by virtue signaling white knighting.
If I’m going to criticize the stupidity of male “movement activists” then you can be damn sure I’m going to hammer the female ones as well. Embarrassing twaddle about “Joan of Arc” will just make me even more determined to expose the reality of imbecilic females given a free ride because of (1) thirsty beta males sweatily watching YouTube videos, (2) male affirmative action cases with an agenda to create yet another protected class within Der Movement, and/or (3) male types whose personal preferences are such that they have limited interactions with women IRL and therefore are unable to discern unsavory and exploitative aspects of female behavior displayed by “women activists.”
Encourage women and homosexuals in the US military by lowering standards and “changing the culture.” Bad idea, most folks on the Right seem to agree. Now, change “US military” to “the movement,” and ask if it is, or is not, a bad idea as well. Note that this question – and its implied answer – is not inconsistent with what I wrote above. Women in Der Movement, when qualified, and without altering standards (such as they are) and the culture (well…..), is acceptable in particular circumstances. But not at the expense of altering everything just for the purpose of “diversity.”
The patent dishonesty in this piece is remarkable. Let’s consider alleged “terrorism” in America starting after September 11, 2001. Very good. Why not start beginning September 10, 2001? Then we have labelling “Based (Chop)Stick Man” a “White supremacist” while he was married to an Asiatrix and has a mixed-race child. White supremacist? Really? Then: Implying that law enforcement works with White nationalists, while in reality the entire System, from the Justice Department down to the cop walking a beat, works hand-in-glove with Antifa and persecutes pro-White activists, as chronicled not only at this blog but in virtually every pro-White blog and website on the Internet.
The “writer” of this piece is a self-admitted Jewess, whose sneering, facially unsymmetrical, Levantine appearance can be seen here. Question: Is dishonesty an inherited trait, enriched in certain ethnies? It certainly seems so. And trust the Alt Right Type I droolcups to have sit-down meetings with fundamentally dishonest Jewesses (redundancy) so that more “evidence” of the “threat” of “White nationalism” (which includes, don’t you know, the racially mixed “Proud Boys” and racial-mixers like Chapman) can be presented to the gullible public. And all of this at The NY Times, which employs an openly racist White-hating bizarrely alien Koreatrix like Jeong, while, at the same time, banging the drum as to the horrors of “White racism.” This whole absurdity I lay at the feet of the pathetically incompetent, arrogant, imbecilic, and pampered affirmative action scions of Der Movement, the quota queens who owe their (pathetically useless) “prominence” in the failed “movement” to their ethnic ancestries, and to nothing else whatsoever.
Hmmm…so, even Zman understands that the “Proud Boys” is a civic nationalist fraud, but others will point to them as “a victory for the pernicious attitudes of WN 1.0.” Sigh….
Biggest losers: Kochs, Bezos, Brin, Cuckersperg, Cook
Biggest winners: nationhood, the 99%, mom and pop stores, flyover country
Status TBD: ethnonationalism, Trump
Hey! I thought Roissy was telling us that Bezos was going to take a hard right turn, politically speaking, because he was working out, and was “jacked?” Don’t we have to “trust the phyz?” What happened? It’s almost as if the juvenile “analysis” of Roissy and other Type I retardates isn’t worth the digital bits expended to present it his Idiocractic audience. And why put “ethnonationalism” and “Trump” in the same category, since obese fat leftist Trump, raging with anti-White and pro-Antifa fervor, is a dedicated enemy of ethnonationalism? I mean, if being “jacked” makes someone “hard right” then, conversely, being covered in a blanket of soft spongy lard, as is Trump, should make one “hard left,” no?
They’re being “processed.” Waiting in Mexico is such a horrific hardship! MAGA! [In case, the Type I retards can’t tell, I’m being sarcastic]
Oh wait, even this may not be true.
To the extent that any of these protesters are actually French natives – or at least racially European if not actually ethnically French – one asks this: why such people will protest “fuel taxes” but not genocidal race replacement? And if the protesters are Third World aliens, what does that say about France? What does it say about Britain that there is now ethnic conflict between Pakistanis and Roma in “English” cities? Do you now understand that I shake my head sadly when Johnson and McCulloch debate about the timing of their victory? This is the sort of “fascist delusion” that Roger Griffin mocks in his books. Every single day brings us closer to total White extinction, but your “leaders” are debating on whether or not we all need to wait for 50 years for the Grand Victory.