Category: GNXP

None Dare Call It Hypocrisy

Well, actually, I dare.

I see it as highly hypocritical that the same “movement” “leaders” – all the quota queens – endlessly complain about being “deplatformed” (and use that as part of their equally endless tin cup panhandling), while at the same time these “leaders” behave the same way with respect to racialist dissidents who honestly critique the “movement” and its “leaders” – “ban” them, essentially “deplatform” them from the central media centers of (what passes for) “movement” discourse.

It is important to clear up some matters lest I be accused of hypocrisy or inconsistency.  First, I do agree with the argument – made, for example, by Bowery at Majority Rights when he and I were both participating at that blog – that freedom of association trumps freedom of speech.  I further made the argument at my own blogs that freedom of speech does not obligate anyone to host any specific type of speech at their own forum; again, freedom of association is above freedom of speech, as long as that speech has somewhere else to go. So, yes, I agree that a blog owner can “ban” anyone they want from their site, and that “banned” person can go and set up their own blog and do their own thing elsewhere on the Internet.  After all, that’s ultimately why this blog exists (and, if I remember correctly, for example, Majority Rights was established after its founders were essentially declared persona non grata at Gene Expression).  I have also argued, in like sense, that a blog can be viewed as a form of political warfare, and so why should political soldiers benefit their enemies by facilitating those enemies’ dissemination of their ideas?  There is no obligation to host your enemy.  Very good, but is a fellow racial activist really an “enemy” because they criticize some of your ideas and actions?  Because they state that you should be held accountable for mistakes (according to your own declared standards of behavior)?  Are fellow activists the functional equivalent of SJW leftists?

It is also true that there is a difference between being banned from a blog (or a set of blogs) and having a major (albeit privately owned) company, which is functionally equivalent to a public utility, banning its use by an entire class of people based on, for example, their political views.  However, the “why should you assist the enemy?” argument cuts both ways here.  The owners of Amazon, Twitter, PayPal, etc. can argue – why should they be obligated to support their enemies?  Oh, you say that they are so successful that they are equivalent to public utilities and so they must be obligated to serve everyone.  Very well.  Imagine the same principle is turned inward to the “movement” – some “movement” blogs, sites, groups, and organizations are so successful (within the “movement” itself) that they are equivalent to “movement” “public utilities” and so they must be obligated to serve all racial activists, even those they disagree with.  I’m sure that violation of freedom of association would be rejected, even though in principle the argument is the same (adjusted for scale between society-at-large and the “movement”).

I’m not making a legalistic argument in this post; instead, I’m making a moral one, based on principles, and based on character and integrity (or the lack therefore in Der Movement).  The basic truth is that these “leaders” are endlessly whining about being deplatformed by private companies, and they behave the same way to racial activist dissidents they do not like.  The scale is different, but the basic principle is the same, and most of the arguments as to why private companies should be obligated to interface with, and serve, the “movement” as a whole can be made to argue that the “movement” as a whole needs to interface with the dissidents within its ranks.

Basically, I see the behavior of the “leaders” as being one of cowardice – fear of engaging with dissident critics and those critics’ ideas – as well as the prima donna sense of entitlement that derives from being products of the “movement’s” affirmative action program – how dare anyone criticize them!  Why should they stoop to answering critics?.  Low character hypocrites: behold the Type I Quota Queen “Leadership” of Der Movement: fearfully hiding from those who would critique their flawed ideas and those who would hold them accountable for their failures.

Note: Someone may point out that my own blogs have traditionally never had comments sections.  That is true.  First, I’m not a fan of such sections, the signal-to-noise ratio is poor; most “movement” comments threads of full of asinine Type I activists, trolls, fetishists, defectives, and “antis.”  Second, and even more importantly, unlike our “fearless leaders,” I am not a full time professional activist (living off of supporters’ donations). I’m merely a part-time amateur; I simply do not have the time to deal with comments; to my mind, it is more important, and more prudent, to invest my limited time in producing new content.  However, our heroic leaders are indeed full time activists with free time aplenty, they are people who believe that comments sections have value, so there is obviously a difference between my blog and theirs in that regard.

Advertisements

Ethnic Cartels vs. Rugged Individualism

Those ethnic cartels.

So much for libertarianism, “rugged individualism,” and the “I got mine Jack” mentality.  No, you don’t have yours, Jews and Asians have it.

And, yes, the same applies in the science field, with Chinese and South Asian Indians being far worse than Jews, engaging in the most ruthless ethnic nepotism with respect to grant awards and publications.

 
Remember the mantra of Asian cogelites: ethnic nepotism for me but not for thee.

Raciocultural Odds and Ends in a Failed Movement

Der Movement is a pathetic joke.

Very cognitive. Very elite.  It is incumbent on the HBDers (as well as the Silk Roaders) to explain to the rest of us why The Land of the Gods is a polluted and overcrowded dystopia whose wealthy want nothing more than to buy their way into US citizenship. Indeed, even the racially inferior, low-IQ swarthoid regions of Europe have a better overall living standard than does the smog-ridden sardine can of China. One finds Chinatowns in Italy but no Dagotowns in China.  Curious, that.  Maybe Breezy’s analyses of PISA scores, real estate, and golf courses can shed some light on that apparent paradox.

More cognitive elitism.  Never forget that GNXP stated they wanted “hundreds of thousands” of such cogelites to enter America every year.

Leftist professor advocates for White genocide.  Why hasn’t he been terminated by Drexel? Until such time that Drexel fires him, Whites should look elsewhere for college and White Drexel alumni should withhold donations.  Surely, if Drexel implicitly supports White genocide (which they do unless they take action – “free speech” arguments don’t hold water when “far-Right” speech is met with ripostes such as “speech has consequences, private institutions are not beholden to the First Amendment, and the constitutional right to free speech only applies to government regulation, not that speech should otherwise have no consequences”), then I see no reason why White kulaks need to support Drexel economically.

Interesting story.  Note that although the natives are now getting restless, they originally strongly supported the influx, and some still do.  But, but, but…I thought they are all non-hunter gatherer clannish ethnocentrics? What happened?  Note also British and Irish volunteers dumping Third Worlders into Greece, analogous to another story, previously chronicled at this blog, of Norwegians dumping Africans into Sicily (and an even earlier story of Germans doing something similar).  One can only imagine the hysterical howls of Der Movement outrage if those stories were reversed.  The reality, however, goes against the “movement’s” narratives and. as we well know, it is not only the MSM that has its Megaphone.

Pro-Trump hysteria in Der Movement jumps the shark as TOO of all places tries rationalizing the vehemently pro-Jewish and pro-Israel stance of a White public figure. Why, I don’t know, maybe the first thing such an article should note (if it were honest) is that Trump has children married to Jews, Jewish grandchildren, his daughter converted to Judaism, and his closest personal advisor is his Jewish son-in-law.  That’s not the whole story, to be sure, but, also surely, it is relevant?  TOO has not only jumped the shark, it has jumped Moby Dick as well.

The American “movement” – always defective and conformist – is losing whatever little ideological diversity it has had.  It is all converging onto a memetic point that is a strange mash-up of: Trump worship, Alt Wrong HBD “race realism,” flirtation with civic nationalism, Nordicism, “game,” and juvenile Alt Right millennial snarkery.  Indeed, the future of the American “movement” is best exemplified by the image of a weasel-faced Roissy sneering at us forever (while having sex with a Negress whose rear end “defies gravity”).

It’s time for a change.  Long overdue in fact.

Very Cognitive, Very Elite, 6/3/16

Another sterling example of pro-HBD immigration policies.


Hey, what’s not to like? It’s a high-IQ South Asian cognitive elitist, the type that GNXP told us we need “hundreds of thousands” more of each year.

Get with the program, Whitey, get with the program.

The Lie of Rampant Far-Right Terrorism

More leftist lies.
Of course, it all depends how the anti-Whites define “terrorism.” Back ~12 years ago, Malloy of GNXP defined as a “terrorists” White folks who opposed Asian immigration to the USA and/or who wrote positive articles about Leon Degrelle.  HBD as a political movement, indeed.

The Latest From Fogle…No, I Mean Derbyshire

More HBD stupidity.

Child porn legalization-supporter (*) John Derbyshire has more nonsense on the far-left VDARE site.

The stupidity in all of this is incredible.  The idea that Serbia’s average IQ is in the range of American Negro IQ is ludicrous, and more Lynnian imbecility. Imagine a nation composed of American Negroes, similar to a giant Detroit, and then compare areas of Europe Lynn and the HBDers say are roughly equivalent. Even morons like the HBDers should see the problem immediately – except they are so consumed by their rigid political dogmas they cannot even question the discordance between theory and reality.

Also, Argentina is not “97% White;” population genetics studies clearly show a very large mestizo population; only a minority fraction of that country are Spanish, Italian, or German.  The idea that “Argentina is White” is one of the great racial lies of HBD as well as Der Movement.

Derbyshire not only quotes Jayman and Lynn, but also the subhuman HBD GNXP worm Malloy, a low-life, no-character piece of filth who, approximately a dozen years ago on the Dienekes blog, called me a “terrorist” because I (1) oppose Asian immigration, and (2) wrote a positive essay about Belgian politician-soldier Leon Degrelle.  In the post-9/11 hysteria, to label someone a “terrorist” simply because they disagree you with on immigration policy or interpretations of history, clearly shows that the person doing the labeling has to be among the biggest pieces of shit in human history.  Just the type to be linked to John “Jared Fogle” Derbyshire.

* His actual words, emphasis added (be sure to spread this far and wide):

…there is an anarcho-tyranny angle here that is sufficiently deplorable in itself. Why should it be a crime to have child porn on your computer? (Note that the item on the charge sheet about Bukovsky “making” child-porn images is bogus. As Claire Berlinski explains, under U.K. law just downloading images counts as “making” them.) 

Enjoying child porn is weird and creepy to be sure. I cleave, however, to the old principle that you can’t go to jail for what you’re thinking. In the Western world of today, as the waters of totalitarian conformity rise all around us, that point of view seems positively quaint.