Category: GOP treason

The Nazi Next Time, II

Further analysis.

Let’s take another look at my The Nazi Next Time essay from 2015.  How does all of that look now from the perspective of Trump’s election and all the events from the year (and more) since that election?

Before we look back at the main points of that “Nazi” essay, let us consider that now, approximately two years later, certain elements of the System Left are beginning to reach similar conclusions.  Read this Frank Rich piece.

However common the ground of Democrats and Trumpists when it comes to economic populism, they will still be separated by the Trumpists’ adamant nativism, nationalism, and racism. The liberal elites who continue to argue that Democrats can win by meeting Trump voters halfway don’t seem to realize that those intransigent voters have long been hardwired to despise them.

The pot calling the kettle black?  Who despises who?  It was the Democratic Party’s abandonment of the White working class, in favor of Colored Identity Politics, which set the stage for right-wing populism to begin with.  Working class and middle class White Americans rightly perceive that the Democrats despise them, so why not return the favor?

Looking to the future in his 60 Minutes White House exit interview, Bannon said, “The only question before us” is whether it “is going to be a left-wing populism or a right-wing populism.” And that is the question, he added, “that will be answered in 2020.” Give the devil his due: He does have the question right. But there is every reason to fear that our unending civil war will not be resolved by any election anytime soon in the destabilized America that Trump will leave behind.

But the long-term threat is bigger than the potential arrival in the Capitol of radicals like Moore or the conspiracy theorist Kelli Ward, a possible inheritor of Flake’s Arizona seat. By illuminating a pathway to power that no one had thought possible, and demolishing the civic guardrails that we assumed protected us from autocrats, Trump has paved the way for far slicker opportunists to gain access to the national stage. Imagine a presidential candidate with Trump’s views and ambitions who does not arrive with Trump’s personal baggage, his undisciplined penchant for self-incrimination, and his unsurpassed vulgarity. 

Yes, I can imagine it: that’s why I wrote the “Nazi” essay; the vision was clear in my mind…and still is.

Finer-tooled instruments — smarter and shrewder demagogues than the movement’s current titular head — may already be suiting up in the wings.

Oh, we can only hope.  I do believe eventually, we’ll see that.

In any case: Sallis was prescient once again.

Now, back to the 2015 Sallis piece.

The hysterical angst of the Republican Establishment concerning the rise of Trump is glorious to observe.  Of course, the interesting thing is their complete lack of self-awareness, their lack of understanding that they themselves are responsible for the predicament they find themselves in.

I was I believe too kind to the GOP then.  Or, perhaps, I realize now that the Republicans don’t care about winning; they only care about being part of the System’s anti-White agenda.  Trumpism in the 2016 election gave the GOP sweeping victories at every level, leaving the Democratic Party in complete disarray.  2016 was a stunning confirmation that right-wing populism is the path for continued Republican electoral dominance even in the face of the changing demographics that the GOP itself has been complicit in promoting.  Trumpism can build a solid White voting bloc, with strengths among demographics (working class Whites, White ethnics) who were part of the Reagan coalition, but who have been straying from the GOP after decades of Neocon-corporate-cuckservatism, as exemplified by the Bush family, “plastic man” Romney, and execrable filth like John McCain (and the pink-frilled Lindsey Graham).  And how has the GOP reacted to this good fortune?  By doubling down on their anti-Trumpism, by obstructing what little the Grand Cuck Trump (this revealed after the election) wants to accomplish in a positive sense, by joining in with the absurd moral panic over “Russian interference,” by cucking to an extreme degree, by doing everything possible to throw away the fruits of the 2-16 electoral sweep an alienate and discourage Trump’s base.  So, now, I believe that they have awareness and understanding – it’s just that they are part of the same corruption, and always have been.  It’s always been a fraud, a scam, a con game run on the White American voter.  The GOP really isn’t in any predicament at all; they are simply playing the role assigned to them, playing it with relish.

Of course, all else being equal. The GOP would prefer to win elections, as they would like to enjoy the power and perks of elected office.  They also want to convince the rubes of the viability of the “two party system” and they want to keep the political donations and campaign contributions flowing in.  But winning is not an existential issue for them, but being anti-White is. If given a choice between winning with an explicitly pro-White agenda and losing as pandering cucks, they’d pick the latter every time. When the choice is put into those stark terms, the real Republican agenda comes into sharp focus.

Consider: after the startling electoral success of 2016, GOP cucks still pretend that association with right-wing populism will somehow damage the party – they will be ‘”toast.”

Still think they really want to win?

One reason is that the GOP has been complicit in the demographic changes that have put them “in between a rock and a hard place,” politically speaking. On the one hand, Republicans look at America’s growing colored population and see the need to appeal to that demographic. On the other hand, the GOP base of support is conservative White Americans, particularly right-of-center White men.  To pander to minorities runs the risk of alienating the base; to secure the base runs the risk of alienating the coloreds. Up to this point, the GOP strategy has been to pander to the colored minorities, while throwing “bones” to the base in the form of phony “implicit Whiteness” and “dog whistling” rhetoric with no real-life political consequences. Heretofore, the GOP has mastered feinting right during the primaries, running centrist in the general election, and, in the rare cases of GOP Presidential victories (since Ronnie Raygun, we have had only the two failed Bush men being elected), governing from the left. Base anger has been silenced by “they have nowhere else to go” “lesser of two evils” electoral considerations.

But now, the rise of Trump is an ill wind blowing in the direction of the GOP elites: the base is starting to awaken and will not be forever willing to “vote for lesser of two evils” and support anti-White leftist Republican candidates.

Whatever else Trump is or does, this alone justifies supporting his 2016 campaign, which I did.  Even if he is a completely self-interested phony, his reliance on right-wing populism “let the toothpaste out of the tube” and the System, however it may try, cannot get it all back in again, long-term.  They may win some battles here or there, tactical successes, but the tides of war will go against them.  By this, I mean the war to make multiculturalism work smoothly, and have White blithely accept their own dispossession.  The System may still win in the end, but their victory will be a Pyrrhic one, a bloody mess that will leave a nation essentially ungovernable long term as any major power on the world scene.  They may suppress right-wing populism short-term (and likely, not even that), but, like a bed penny, it’ll keep on popping up again.  Trump is a catalyst, a “John the Baptist” foreshadowing things to come.

But there is something else. The problem with Trump is seemingly not only his ideology of right-wing populism (real or fake), it is also because the Republican Establishment – with some justification – see Trump as an ill-informed, vulgar, obnoxious, childish buffoon, with no self-control and an embarrassing lack of gravitas.  Very well, but in response to those concerns I have two words: Pat Buchanan.

Like Trump, Buchanan ran for President as a right-wing populist Republican. In fact, there is considerable overlap in overt ideology between the two men’s campaigns. While lacking Trump’s “alpha jerk-boy” charisma, Buchanan has certain advantages that you would think would endear him to the GOP elites: Buchanan is a well-informed, articulate, religious man, with strong Establishment connections, and prior political experience in previous Republican administrations. Buchanan has always been an “inside-the-Beltway” man, and is not an obnoxious buffoon.

And how did the GOP elites deal with the more polished and political Buchanan?  With the same disdain and hysteria that they now reserve for “Der Trumpening.”  The Elite made it clear that they would never accept Buchanan as the nominee, they panicked over his early successes, they sabotaged his campaign (as I recall, they even prevented him from being on the ballot in some states), etc.  So, the case of Buchanan proves that the problem with Trump is not so much his repellent personal aspects, but his core of right-wing populism. Anything that appeals to Whites is anathema to the GOP, which is of course self-destructive given the nature of the GOP base (it is not for nothing that Sam Francis labeled the GOP “the Stupid Party”).

As stated above, the GOP would rather lose as anti-Whites than win as pro-White.  It’s a well-established trend dating back decades.

The point is that the GOP lost anyway with Bush and Dole in 1992 and 1996. While it is understandable that the incumbent would be favored in 1992, there was no excuse for favoring the “living mummy” “civil rights Republican” Dole over Buchanan in 1996. Favoring Buchanan would have solidified the GOP base and could have put the party in the direction of a right-wing populist track that could have genuinely benefited White Americans.

That is anathema to Establishment Republicans.

But, no. The elites sabotaged Buchanan and they suppressed right-wing populism for several electoral cycles. Now it has erupted in a more “virulent” form with Donald Trump. Instead of learning their lesson and understanding that the base cannot be taken for granted, instead of understanding that they need candidates that appeal to the base, the GOP elites are hell-bent on sabotaging Trump and suppressing right-wing populism for another couple of electoral cycles.

They may succeed but they are playing with fire.

They couldn’t stop Trump from winning, but they are fairly successful in teaming up with Democrats to block Trump’s ostensible agenda. Here, they are getting help from Trump himself, who betrays his base at every opportunity.  xxThere are some who say that there is evidence that Trump is sincere in his right-wing populism: he gave up his easy billionaire lifestyle to run for President. But that in and of itself means nothing.  It ignores issues of ego and the lust for (political) power. By analogy, we can ask why billionaires all don’t just ease up and enjoy the “good life,” why do most of them continue to strive, “wheel and deal,” obsess over money, and engage in rent-seeking behavior, including political lobbying, designed to further increase their wealth and power?  That’s the nature of the rich and powerful: they are never satisfied; they always want more (and that is one reason that they become rich and powerful to begin with).  If such people are given the opportunity to go into the history books as US President, would they eschew that opportunity?  Trump’s Presidential ambitions tell us nothing about his sincerity.  The fact that Trump ran as a right-wing populist may reflect his real views, or it may simply reflect his realization that the only way he could stand out from the established field of GOP cucks was to give the base the “red meat” that they were craving.  If Trump is really the shrewd businessman his admirers says he is, then he must have noticed the open political niche space to the political right of the GOP candidate field.  Trump’s sincerity would be better displayed by an honest and consistent effort on his part to fulfill his campaign promises.  That he is not doing; instead we get jackass tweeting, half-heated measures, backpedaling, a disgraceful waste of political capital, and waffling on issues like DACA.  If there is sincerity there, it is awfully hard to see.

Who will come after Trump?  Who will be the next right-wing populist?  As even worthless and weak Whites become more aggressive out of sheer desperation, who will they turn to next?  Someone more extreme and firebrand-populist compared to Trump to the same degree Trump is compared to Buchanan? 

It won’t be “the fire next time,” but it may well be “the Nazi next time.”  The GOP elites had better hope that their country clubs are well fortified indeed.

Will Trump’s constant betrayals and failures discourage his base?  Or, as Rich suggests, whatever the outcome of Trump, the base will only become more energized?  The latter, we hope.  But we must realize that the trauma of Trump has immunized the System against the “virus” of right-wing populism; they’ll be on their guard against it, and will try and nip any further manifestations in the bud.  Where they will fail, I believe, is that the System is, at its heart, anti-White; they cannot muster up any real “red meat” to satisfy a growing sense of White Identity Politics that will become ever more resistant to Democratic attempts to divert race with economics or GOP attempts at implicitly White “culture war” dog whistling.  The toothpaste is out of the tune, so to speak.

But, the System may not be able to win over the Trump base, but they’ll use their power to sabotage future political manifestations of right-wing populism.

In the movie The Day of the Jackal, the Jackal tells the OAS leaders: “Not only have your own efforts failed, but you’ve rather queered the pitch for everyone else.”  One can say that about Trump perhaps (and about the “movement” more generally, certainly).

Now, right-wing populism, essentially civic nationalism, is not the answer.  It is best a precursor or at least a stop gap, and at worst a diversion, a cul-de-sac, a competitor to what is needed – which is explicitly prop-White racial nationalism – White nationalism.  At this point in time, we can work to ensure that right-wing populism serves positive functions, as a precursor to White nationalism (the membrane separating the two is thin; it is one step from civic nationalism to racial nationalism, but an big step many do not make), or at least as a stop gap as racial nationalism begins to develop (Trump is in a sense a stop gap; one other benefit of his election, besides all “breaking the ice” for more extreme politics and increasing balkanization an chaos, is that he prevented a Clinton election that could have led to more repressive conditions for the development of racial nationalism – worse is not always better).

I would suggest that at this point, right-wing populism is best suited for Presidential campaigns and also for Senate and Governor races, and for lower level races in areas in which the White population is not sufficiently “prepared” for more radical approaches.  However, in selected areas and selected times, we should begin to consider explicitly White candidates – even racial nationalist WNs – ranging from school board elections all the way up to the US House of Representatives. Some successes there can lead to consideration of WNs for the higher level races.  The value of political WN campaigns exists regardless of the electoral outcome: promoting balkanization, recruiting, propaganda, organization, normalization of racial nationalist discourse and “pushing the envelope,” forcing the civic nationalists to get off the fence in one direction or another, a whole host of advantages.

Political campaigns would benefit from effective local organizing and vice versa.  It’s been said, and I believe it to be true, than in some locales, WNs love near each other but do not know of each other’s existence. Even if some fraction of these are kooks, freaks, defectives, Nutzis, fetishists, etc. there may still be a critical mass of useful like-minded people in certain areas.  The trick is to get them together, to work together, and to organize, safely, without the threat of infiltrators exposing them all.  How to do it is uncertain.  Existing meetings with their “extreme vetting” are ludicrous jokes; real extreme vetting would help, but I’m not sure that Der Movement has the competence or discipline to pull it off.  Anyone who is able to put together an effective plan for local organizing is going to be at an enormous advantage.  In the competition for racial nationalist leadership, those who can perform effectively will rise, and those who are laughably inept will fall.  

WNs cannot depend on a “man on white horse” civic cuck “hero” to save them.  The Nazi Next Time is not going to descend from Valhalla, complete with blessings of Saint Adolf; instead, the “demagogues” of the future will come to the fore as a result of hard work, discipline, and commitment.

This will, I believe, likely require a New Movement that replaces the clown show that currently exists.  I’m not sanguine about that, but this blog will continue to play the role of “loyal opposition.”  Racial nationalism is the future, but that future will only become actualized if we make it so.  

Future installments of this topic will be forthcoming when events and new ideas warrant; note as well there is overlap with the concept of Political EGI, as any pro-White leader who is worthwhile must incorporate (even if indirectly) the concept of genetic interests into their memetic toolkit.


Of Cucks and Men

Something positive about the Alt Right.

I have been critical of the Alt Right, including Spencer, when called for, and will continue to do so (something about the latest Jorjani fiasco will be out soon).  But the converse is true as well: when these guys do something right, I’ll support them.

Even though the Florida speech didn’t go down in an optimal fashion, nevertheless, giving these speeches – or attempting to – is a good idea, and I have to give Richard Spencer credit for putting himself out there, physically, taking risks, speaking truth to power, and defending his people.  

Whatever else one can say about him, Spencer is a man, contrasted to mewling pathetic cucks like John McCain or George W. Bush (whose wife, in my opinion, should be indicted for murder for what she did in high school).

As for the scum in the Florida crowd, shouting Spencer down, I say this: Like it or not, the Far Right is here to stay. I don’t like the Alt Right nor the “movement” as a whole, but I do acknowledge that we are, broadly speaking, on the same side, and I certainly fully support Spencer in his quest to get racial nationalist ideas a fair hearing.

Now, I think he’d be more successful if he’d cut ties with the juvenile jackassery of the Alt Right, and not deal with the likes of Jorjani again, but I realize that when I give advice to the “movement” it goes in one ear and out the other.

Regardless, I’ll give credit where credit is due.

Rotten Orange News: More Betrayal

More betrayal.

Is Roissy choking on his “white pills” yet?

More immigration!  More “high skilled” immigrants so American professionals can be displaced, and American IT workers can train their brownster replacements.

That’s yet another reason it’s laughable when the Trump fanboys pretend the only issue of concern in Syria.  The buffoon Trump is essentially reneging on his entire campaign.  What’s next: support for the “gang of eight” amnesty bill?  That we need to “build bridges, not walls?”

To summarize the problem crudely: Whites thought they were voting for Pat Buchanan but got Lindsey Graham instead.

Yes, and talk of “geostrategy” to support Trump’s foreign policy cucking can cut both ways. Let’s say that our “geostrategy” lies in a grand alliance with Russia against militant Islam to the south and China to the east.  Dem Russkis gots lots of oil too!  And think of all the arms sales we can have with China’s Asian neighbors arming them against Chicom aggression. Wow, it’s a win, win!

November Musings, 11/2/16


The Alt-Right crowd supporting Trump because they’ve found out that they “really care about America” and that Trump will save America have got it all backwards.  Look, typically throughout history, revolutions have NOT occurred during the time of greatest repression but instead have occurred when that repression was suddenly relaxed.  

The point of Trump is NOT to save America (a possible short-term effect of a Trump Presidency), but to wreck it (a more plausible long-term effect).  By relaxing the anti-White regime, President Trump will weaken the multicultural state just enough that it becomes more beatable, he demonstrates the System is not invincible, he gives us room to maneuver, he gives us breathing room (if he sticks to a hardline on immigration), he galvanizes the White resistance (assuming the Right doesn’t fall into the Ronnie Raygun victory euphoria and complacency), he emboldens racial “real-talk,” he’ll likely oppose speech restrictions, he makes WNs more confident, and by antagonizing the Left he makes sure that there will be no shortage of divisive antagonism to fuel a slow drift toward a more revolutionary situation.  When the repression is relaxed, the rage from decades of anti-White persecution is free to boil over; in contrast, when the repression is at its highest, the resistance can be stunned by the oppressive ferocity of a triumphant System.  Hillary Clinton will wreck America as well, but in a different, worse (which is NOT better), and less palatable fashion.  Under her Presidency, we will not have the room for maneuver or the breathing space, and those who would otherwise be attracted to our side will be cowed into silence or will be caught up into the mainstream political infighting between Clinton and the Cuckservative Right.  And since people “love a winner,” the Right becomes more attractive with a Trump victory (despite that he’s not one of us, far from it); while a Trump defeat taints the Right with the stench of failure.  In summary, from the standpoint of the ethnic genetic interests of European-Americans, a Trump victory is optimal, but not for the reasons the fanboys think.

At first I was going to dismiss this as yet more girlish pro-Trump “movement” hysteria.  But he makes some good points, although at times overblown.  I’ve been (justifiably) critical of Der Touchback this electoral season, but I must give credit where credit is due. First, Fat Don didn’t have to run for President putting his comfortable life at risk and subjecting himself to a withering abuse that makes the treatment of Nixon at the height of Watergate look benign comparison.  Whether Trump did it out of a love for America, or simply for his own ego, the fact is he’s done more to destabilize the multicultural regime this electoral season than Der Movement has achieved in its entire existence.  I’ll vote for Donny BMI with great satisfaction indeed.

If Comey “violated the Hatch Act” with his recent letter to Congress (an absurd accusation), then he more certainly violated it in July when he let an obviously guilty Clinton off the hook for purely political reasons.  You can’t have it both ways.  Similarly, if Russia is lambasted for: interfering with the US election” than why cannot the same be said about Mexico or the Vatican?  Or is the interference only a problem when it benefits Trump?

Is there any more evidence you need that the GOP must be destroyed?

Child porn apologist Derbyshire writes:

Unfortunately I find that I am now in love with Annet Mahendru. When I confessed this to Mrs Derbyshire, she counter-confessed that she is in love with Noah Emmerich. The balance of domestic affections thus remains undisturbed, and we continue to watch The Americans with guiltless pleasure.

I’ll let the reader look up the racial provenances of Mahendru and Emmerich, and decipher what that says about the raciosexual preferences of the Derbyshires.

Greg Johnson on Trump and American Greatness

More reasonable than Roissy.

Let’s see how Greg Johnson is much more reasonable than the hysterical Roissy.

Trump is not the last hope for the white race in North America, but he is the last hope for America as a unitary nation.

That’s much more reasonable than the Amren/TOO and Roissyian nonsense that “Trump is the last chance/hope for White America.”  No, he’s not.  White America will still be there if he loses and will need “hope” more than ever. Johnson’s assertion that Trump is the last hope for the continuation of a unified traditional America – which is a quite different comment – OK, I’ll buy that. But the problem is deeper than that.  Even if he wins, in another several election cycles, we’ll be back to the situation of a “do or die” choice between a populist Americanist and a globalist “shitlib.”  Trump’s civic nationalism is at best a stop-gap. America’s dire situation is this: if Trump loses, America as we have known it is finished; if Trump wins, the day of reckoning for America has merely been postponed.

But all of that is a far cry from the absurd comment that White America per se is done if Trump loses. White America and the American nation are no longer synonymous.  That may be unfortunate, but it is true.  If Trump loses White America will go on, but it’s unlikely that the United States of America as a historical nation-state will have any long-term future.

“Pussygate” also revealed the cowardice and treachery of the mainstream Republican leadership. All these people have to go. Nobody who votes for Donald Trump should cast a vote for Paul Ryan or any other backstabbing cuck. These people’s political careers need to end on November 8th or Trump’s victory will be a hollow one. Not only must Trump shake the cucks off his coattails, he needs to completely freeze them out of his administration. And if his resolve to do this ever wavered, it will waver no more.

I agree 100%.  Regardless of the electoral outcome, the GOP Establishment needs to be politically destroyed. That’s the same Establishment that’s been telling the White base for decades that they had to support Establishment cuckservative milksops because “we need to have Republican solidarity to defeat that dastardly liberal Democrat.”  Now that the shoe’s on the other foot, and the base picked their own candidate, the Establishment has been throwing a temper tantrum, actively sabotaging the campaign of the base’s GOP candidate and supporting a very dastardly liberal Democrat (even in some cases openly endorsing her).  Why the hell should the base EVER vote for an Establishment candidate ever again? All that is required is that some fraction of Trump supporters stop voting for the cucks and, given how class most national and state-wide elections are, the GOP Establishment is “toast.”

Donald Trump really is a great man. What makes a man great? A man is not great because he is perfect. Great men often have enormous flaws, make catastrophic mistakes, and face overwhelming obstacles. A man is great if he can overcome his flaws, learn from his mistakes, and surmount obstacles. Within a 48-hour period, Donald Trump faced and overcame a scandal that would have crushed weaklings like Jeb Bush and Paul Ryan. Just think of what he can do for America. Yes, he can Make America Great Again.

I’m critical of Roissyian Trump worship, but here Greg Johnson is being more reasonable. He’s defining greatness in a particular way that does indeed fit Trump.  I myself doubt that Trump can really make America great again, but that’s not why I’m supporting him.  I have no doubt that Trumpism can make multiculturalism untenable, and that’s my objective.  To see where we may be headed, read this which essentially makes the same basic point as this (which of course cannot be cited, because, well, you know….).

I’ll be putting something together about what Der Movement should do if Trump loses (likely) with some brief words about a Trump victory (unlikely).

Der Movement in the News, 10/10/16

It’s…Der Movement.

This is a commentator (plain font) at Roissy’s Pussy Pedestalization blog, with Roissy’s homoerotic Trumpite responses in bold font:

Mr Bigglesworth
We’ve all just witnessed what happens when you attach white survival to the political fortunes of a preening, showboating narcissist. He lets you down in a YUGE way.
[CH: he hasn’t let anyone down except the self-righteous cuck that resides in your fevered fantasies.]
Is there a single person here who still predicts a Trump win? Genuinly?
[yes. genuinely.]
Living inside your own protective bubble, blocking out reality and bitching about anyone who points out glaring truths isn’t “Alpha” at all.
[you aren’t pointing out any glaring truths. you’re pointing out what a pussy you are for getting verklempft over some bawdy lockerroom talk.]
It’s pathetic and an insult to your own intelligence. Have some dignity and stop embarrasing yourselves.
[you are a demoralization agent. you bring nothing substantive to the discussion except your mental fainting couch and debbie downer kvetching. you’re done here.]

I agree that the “lewd” comments are nothing.  But that’s a side issue.  We’ve had months of evidence that Trump is a lazy buffoon who is perhaps the worst general election political candidate I’ve witnessed in my lifetime.  If he wins – which is unlikely but possible – it will be in spite of his laziness and incompetence and solely due to the pent-up anti-PC rage of the GOP base.  If he loses, he’d have thrown away an eminently winnable election – and fanboys like Roissy will NOT be allowed to forget how they tried to tie White racialism to the Trump balloon (given his BMI, “balloon” is appropriate).

But let’s be fair, Der Touchback seems to have done better – much better – in the second debate, and the “because you’d be in jail” was classic.  At this point, Donny Cuckamnesty has little to lose and may as well go on the offensive, but in the calm and direct manner as the above quite illustrated.  Well done, Don Fats!

The GOP Establishment.

Remember that in 2020 when they try and foist a prime cuck on the American public with the mantra “we Republicans have to stick together to beat the Democrat.”

MacDonald on Trump’s “lewd” comments.

Counter-Currents commenter on East Asians:

In addition, the author’s comments about East Asians also rings true. Their lack of inventiveness, in technology, political science, art, music and every field of endeavor is obvious. Their gene pool does not produce European-type geniuses who create and move humankind forward. The Europeans who landed in the 1700s were amazed by the complete lack of progress in every field of endeavor as they compared that China to Marco Polos writings. Had Europeans never encountered Asia, it would still be almost exactly as it was in the 1700s.
Asians are separated from Europeans by 30K years, they have very different brain equipment. They cheat in tests because it is advantageous to do so, and they do not have inborn guilt to prevent them from doing so. They optimize their situations by cheating when available, it is logically the most beneficial choice. An Asian reading that “you shouldn’t cheat” because it is “unfair” or “immoral” to do so even though it greatly helps you would probably find that to be a silly and nonsensical statement.

Basket of Bunkers

The Left’s misunderstanding (or deception).

Hillary’s supporters are doubling down on her “basket of deplorables” comment; indeed, they tell us that she underestimated the proportion of Trump’s supporters who are irredeemable bigots.  Thus, the current narrative of the Left is that a very significant portion of the White American electorate is composed of hardcore racists akin to the most extreme of the Alt-Right – many millions of White racial nationalists.

However, the reality is that White racial nationalism in America is tiny and powerless, often persecuted, sans resources and supporters.  Indeed, many racial nationalists – myself included – have asserted that only if a fraction – even 10% – of White Americans supported our views then we would be on the road to victory, given a bedrock of support; history is always made by a dedicated minority. But that minority must have some numbers, two dozen guys measuring each other’s cephalic indices with calipers in the basement of a meeting hall just won’t cut it.  Obviously, this minority does not currently exist.

So, why this discrepancy between breathless Leftist accounts of numberless hordes of virulent White racists, and the grim reality of a powerless “movement?”

The Left, to the extent they believe their own rhetoric, are captive to their Manichean mindset; they view race through a binary prism: if you are not a racial progressive, then you are a Hitler-loving Nutzi.  This is absurd and unrealistic, as racial attitudes exist along a continuum, and the bulk of even the most hardcore Trump supporters are more liberal about race than are most Alt-Righters, never mind other types of racial nationalists.

Trump’s supporters, and here I am talking about those the Left labels as “deplorables,” are at best “Archie Bunker types” – causal bigots whose mild racism is almost always a private affair and never manifests as public behavior or, more importantly, into the political realm. These are civic nationalist types who don’t like Blacks (who does – other than Trump, the cucks, and the Left?) and who have nostalgia about an America that is long gone.  In the past they have cheerfully voted for the most outrageous of anti-White liberal Republican cucks.  But after many years of disappointments and frustrations, they feel like Trump’s politically incorrect speech gives them a voice (however muted and cucked it may be). These people are hardly racial nationalists, not in any way supporters of Der Movement, and are for the most part completely useless – for now – for racial nationalism.

They do, however, constitute a possible source of recruits (at least those who don’t already have one foot in the grave – remember, Trump’s supporters are all “old grouchy White men”).

However, before Der Movement can go recruiting among the Bunkers, it must get its own house in order.  Who in their right mind would want to be recruited to a deranged embarrassment like Der Movement? [Note: I’m obviously not in my right mind, to have been so recruited in the past.  After all, haven’t my critics labeled me as insane?].  I have to laugh at those activists who dream of a “Day of the Rope,” a “reckoning” for all who have harmed the White race.  How about looking at yourselves?  If there ever is a settling of accounts by a real racial nationalist revolution, all the Nutzis and their leaders (including, perhaps, some “Alt-Right” heroes) had better wonder what end of the rope they’ll end up at.

Of course, a dedicated pacifist and effete liberal such as myself does not like to think about such distasteful topics.

In any case, “movement” stupidity and failure aside, the inability of the Left to understand the concept of degree leads them to hysterical errors in which all is black vs. white (no pun intended).  And then they accuse us of simplicity – of not being able to see all the shades of gray!  Fifty shades, no doubt, to the leftist eye, if they would only look.