Category: HBD as a political movement

Racial Odds and Ends, 12/30/16

Several points.

Breezy gets upset that one of his Asian gods (a Chinatrix, cue Derb’s heavy breathing) stupidly attempts to delegitimize the concept of race.

The moronic flim-flam about Asians and Africans possibly being more genetically related to each other than to members of their own race was (easily) refuted years ago.  Further, the real weaknesses of these ancestry tests, and their strengths (kinship), was discussed as well.  But, perhaps dear reader, you are aware that the petty Sailer has never brought himself to link to any of my articles over the years, including the early science-enriched ones at Amren and TOO.  That tells you all you need to know about HBD lies and mendacity. Sailer would rather flop around trying to answer the Chinatrix with guesses and snark rather than quote the deplorable Sallis.  Of course, he could just skip Sallis and directly quote the Witherspoon paper, but that won’t do either, since genetic kinship is the enemy of HBD.

Here we see a Happy Penguin who doesn’t look very happy at all.  Boo-hoo, Pete, what’s up?  A six figure salary won’t be in reach for 2017? Maybe folks would be more willing to donate to VDARE if they knew exactly where the money was going.

Here we see how genuine Pan-European cooperation, pooling resources among European nationalists, have allowed great progress for APF and ETN in 2016.

Cretaceous, 9/19/16

A voice of sanity at an HBD outlet.

Another great Cretaceous comment at Amren:

Cretaceous Jones Matthew Kelly • 13 hours ago
That being said, and I agree with you, this isn’t a pro white site. I come here to watch the trainwreck. What started out as the right thing has now digressed to an obvious money making deal.

This Cretaceous Jones fellow is fast becoming (by far) the best and most honest commentator at Amren. Yes, it isn’t a “pro white site” and, yes, it is a “trainwreck.” The only difference I have here with Cretaceous is that I do not believe that money is the motivating factor. The people involved could be making more money, lots more money, outside of the “movement.” What’s the motivation then? It’s being a major “media wing” of the HBD political movement, which has as its aim the groveling subjugation of White Gentiles to Jews and East Asians.

Whither HBD and the West

HBD vs. racial nationalism.

Let us consider this Amren comment, emphasis added:

Cretaceous Jones slargusparg • 3 hours ago

What pro White site would advocate voting for Hillary? Hillary says, if elected, she will end “racism” once and for all. That will be more devastation for Whites in the US. Perhaps this site has steered very left of what this group was founded on. John will remove my post. He removes any posts that conflict with his liberal views. He scripts the comments to back up his line of liberal thinking. One has to wonder why Taylor wants his site to be like this. I’ve read on a number of blogs that Engelman has gone to, and he is forever promoting that Taylor prefers Asians and Jewish over Whites.

Now, I do not know what Engelman writes at other blogs, I am only familiar with his drivel at Amren. But based on that drivel, I would not be surprised if what Cretaceous (nice name, by the way) says is accurate. However, even if Engelman says that, it does not mean it is true. I do not believe that Taylor actually prefers Asians and Jews over Whites. Perhaps over White ethnics, but not over Whites as a whole, particularly Anglos/Nordics.
But the point is why do comments such as that by Cretaceous Jones exist? Why is this a constant refrain; if there is smoke there must be a least a small fire smoldering somewhere.
Ultimately, the HBD/race realist school of thought is inimical to genuine racial nationalism.
Consider this, emphasis added:

On the other end of the IQ reproductive strategy distribution, immigrants from East Asian countries are outcompeting whites in gaining admission to universities and in prestigious, high-income jobs. The long-term result will be that the entire white population (not including Jews) is likely to suffer a social status decline as these new immigrants become more numerous. (Jews are unlikely to suffer a decline in social status not only because their mean IQ is well above that of the East Asians but, more importantly, because Jewish IQ is skewed toward excelling in verbal skills. The high IQ of East Asians is skewed toward performance IQ, which makes them powerful competitors in engineering and technology. See PTSDA, [Ch. 7] and Lynn [1987]. Jews and East Asians are thus likely to occupy different niches in contemporary societies.) Presently white gentiles are the most underrepresented group at Harvard, accounting for approximately 25 percent of the students, while Asians and Jews constitute at least half of the student body while constituting no more than five percent of the population (Unz 1998). The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and media elite.

Herein lies a fundamental difference between the HBD/race realist school of thought and the racial nationalist school. The HBDers will find nothing wrong in the scenario outlined above, in which America is dominated by Asian and Jewish elites, while White Gentiles are reduced to a groveling, subaltern, low-caste servile race. Racial nationalists on the other hand – White nationalist activists – will unalterably oppose such a development. Between these two viewpoints there can be no compromise and the two views do not, and cannot, comprise elements of the same “movement.” They are opponents, not allies, even though the Pepe Brigade does not realize it yet. What will “Kek” think? For shame!

Alt-Wrong on Display

HBD is simply a political movement to elevate Jews and Asians at the expense of Whites.

The attitude of the HBD faction of the Alt-Right is captured by the following Amren comments exchange, emphasis added:

Wilburn Sprayberry  Wilburn Sprayberry • 19 hours ago
And my job won’t be done until a woman can rise to explain that she doesn’t want blacks in her children’s school b/c blacks are less intelligent and more violent than whites and black boys think they can hustle white girls with impunity and blacks have spent the past 60 years destroying American public education.
5  • Reply•Share ›
JohnEngelman  Wilburn Sprayberry • 19 hours ago
Oriental children will teach that woman’s children good study habits, and respect for the teachers.
2  • Reply•Share ›
Cobbett  JohnEngelman • 19 hours ago
Don’t they cheat (exams) a lot?
3  • Reply•Share ›
JohnEngelman  Cobbett • 18 hours ago
Some cheat. Most study harder and are more intelligent.
1  • Reply•Share ›
LACountyRedneck  JohnEngelman • 18 hours ago
Are they smart enough to get proper educations at their own Asian schools instead of ours?
2  • Reply•Share ›
JohnEngelman  LACountyRedneck • 18 hours ago
I am glad that there are so many Orientals in the United States. They are a wonderful race. I have never known one I disliked.
2  • Reply•Share ›

Nick Dean is Right

An intelligent comment on TOO…will wonders never cease.

Nick Dean

August 5, 2016 – 1:56 pm | Permalink

They are not automatically on our side who just admit we’re right about something. Something could be anything.

Lynn’s brand of HBD is a fraud, as a wise blogger has pointed out. We want to preserve our OWN biodiversity. The Jewish authored HBD ideas that eliminate biodiversity as such from discussion, but prioritize behavioural diversity are a threat, not a friend.
I mean, it’s McInnes, ffs!

Nick Dean – 100% correct.

As stated here many times, HBD is a political movement. Now, I sometimes engage in a bit of hyperbole, and say that HBD “wants to enslave Whites to their Jewish and Asiatic masters.”
The reality is close to that though.
HBD is all about co-opting racial science and genuine race realism in the service of Jewish and East Asian – also also South Asian – interests. HBDers aim at aracial cognitive elitism, with a favored objective of an admixed Jeurasian elite, consisting of higher-IQ Whites, Jews, and Asians. Racial nationalism is opposed and Salterism attacked; anything that elevates race and kinship over IQ is considered anathema.
That isn’t anything any real racial nationalist would, or should, want to have anything to do with.

The Triracial-HBD View of Cruzian Dishonor

Triracial Jamaican Jayman asserts about Cruz dishonoring his pledge:


This was the studliest thing Cruz has done, ever.
You got it twisted. Cruz was courageous to perform a bait-and-switch and to foil his competitor. What subhuman omega sperg would have endorsed the man who attacked his wife? Trump went to great effort to extract that betrayal, and then he was surprised?
Cruz earns a B+ for late-stage damage control.
Trump earns a D for assessing Cruz’s loyalty after smearing him for so long.
C_H earns an A+ for favoring Trump over Cruz.
C_H earns a D for identifying “courage” and honor. Ain’t no honor for Cruz endorsing Trump after everything that’s gone down.
Check yourself.

Keep in mind that this thing is Derbyshire’s HBD superhero, praised to the skies by child porn apologist Derbyshire at every opportunity
Getting wise to the anti-White political movement known as HBD yet, White man?

Lynn’s Method of Pseudoscience

In seven easy steps.

1. You come up with a hypothesis, such as the idea that GDP varies with IQ, and that there is a casual relationship so that national IQ determines national GDP (and other measures of national success and productivity).
2. Instead of being a proper scientist and viewing your hypothesis with skepticism, and attempting to falsify the hypothesis, you instead desperately try to find data points to support your hypothesis, including cherry picking data and “estimating” (i.e., fabricating) IQ scores based on some achievement test data (tests that are not necessarily g-loaded and tests that Asians are known to cheat on).
3. In order to explain the ludicrously low IQs “estimated” in this fashion, you invent “intermediate racial clines” in European populations, based upon laughably misinterpreted single locus data and/or outdated studies, while openly ignoring the established fact that autosomal DNA studies irrefutably reject the idea that the relevant populations are some sort of “intermediate racial cline” significantly different from other “non-intermediate” European populations (including those in the same nation state).  The data instead show the usual, known gradual genetic clines that exist within Europe along the North-South and East-West axes, so that there are gradual and proportional shifts in ancestry proportions moving along, for example, the North-South axis of of the Italian state.  Thus, S. Italians are slightly “less Northern European” and slightly “more Near Eastern” than are N. Italians, but are hardly some sort of mid-way, intermediate racial cline spanning between N. Italians and Near Eastern/North African populations.  In the same manner, one would not label Russians and Finns as “intermediate racial clines” between Europeans and Asians, just because they are a (small) bit “more Asian” than are NW European Celto-Germanic populations. Gradual genetic clines and low levels of admixture exist across Europe, and these do not define intermediate populations with IQs marginally higher than that of American Negroes.
4. You then ignore, or spin away, actual IQ data that completely refute the “estimates” you’ve “calculated.”  After all, your “estimates” fall neatly on a linear regression of IQ-GDP (actually, correlation, but since you assume causation, it’s akin to a [invented] linear regression), while the real IQ data present a more complicated and nuanced story.  So the real data must be “wrong.”

5. Instead of admitting that you are wrong, or even just admitting the possibility of being wrong, you double down on your errors, obstinately defending data and explanations that do not, and cannot, support your hypothesis.
6. Then someone on The Mankind Quarterly advisory board writes a fawning review of your work, with the interesting fact that you yourself are the Assistant Editor of the journal reviewing your own work (no conflict of interest there, certainly).  That review is then breathlessly reproduced at a pro-Jewish “racialist” site (that has previously described its viewpoint as “yellow supremacist”), despite the fact that site knows full well that the work is highly controversial and is hardly supported by iron-clad facts.
7. The most charitable explanation of all this is that Lynn is emotionally invested in his hypothesis, and identifies his entire career and his professional reputation (such as it is) on that hypothesis and its supporting theories being correct.  Therefore, he’ll refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence of being wrong (particularly on the population genetics data, about which there is no doubt), and he’ll be enabled in his pseudoscience by HBDers and Nutzis.