Category: HBD as a political movement

Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Fiction

Another “movement” fail.  Emphasis added.

Maybe Johnson should read more Wolfe and Vance, and watch less Star Trek, if he’s going to propose that science fiction is always promoting liberal globalist utopias.

My first premise is: No form of government is fully compatible with scientific and technological progress if it is founded on dogmas that are contrary to fact. For instance, the republic of Oceania might have a population of intelligent and industrious people, an excellent educational system, first rate infrastructure, and a booming economy. But if the state religion of Oceania mandates that the Earth is flat and lies at the center of the universe, Oceania is not going to take us to the stars.

That’s true.  Therefore any government led by Der Movement, with its nonfactual, failed dogmas is not “going to take us to the stars.”  Der Movement, as chronicled here, openly lies about, for example, genetics studies on Ancient Egypt.  It lies about almost everything.  They do so repeatedly. You can’t “go to the stars” based on a foundation of lies.  Yes, the Nazis built V2 rockets and that’s great.  They also dismissed Relativity as “Jewish science.”  You’re not “going to the stars” with Type I stupidity.

My second premise is: The advocacy of racially and ethnically diverse societies—regardless of whether they have liberal or conservative regimes—is premised on the denial of political experience and the science of human biological diversity.

Case in point.  Here Johnson promotes a key feature of “movement” pseudoscientific lying – HBD – and classifies it as a “science.”  This is proof positive that “traditionalist” “snug in your hobbit hole” Type I “traditionalists” know nothing about science – real science, the Popperian science that Harpending talked about.  Endless lies and hand-waving spin to prop up failed hypotheses, coupled to an aversion to true hypothesis testing, is not science.  It is a fraud. Look at Dutton’s book on Rushton – it revealed Rushton as a fraud, but the fanboys and fangirls still rally around their HBD cult figure, and then they have the nerve to accuse “Jewish intellectual movements” of being cult-like.  On the other hand, HBD can itself be considered a Jewish intellectual movement, so there’s that.

My third premise is: Ethnonationalism is based on both political experience and the science of human biological diversity—and does not deny any other facts. Therefore, ethnonationalism is more compatible with scientific and technological progress than are racially and ethnically diverse societies—other things being equal.

Well, HBD is a fraud, and so, yes, I can agree that ethnonationalism is based on a fraud.  Agreement!  Agreement!

In short, if liberal democracy and global capitalism are returning us to the mud, it is ethnonationalism that will take us to the stars.

Rewritten:

In short, if liberal democracy and global capitalism are returning us to the mud, and if ethnonationalism will lead us to murderous intra-European warfare and ethnic cleansing (advocated by its followers), it is pan-Europeanism that will take us to the stars.

Any serious major political movement needs people with serious science backgrounds.  In particular, any movement centered around a biological concept such as race absolutely needs scientists, especially those with a biological specialty that would be helpful in interpreting race-related matters.  Having “traditionalists” and “metapolitical philosophers,” or the typical Type I bully boys and juvenile Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Righters rambling incoherently about science won’t cut it.  STEM folks associated with the Left – and there are plenty – will carve up those folks like a dinner roast.  The Right – especially the Far Right – needs its own STEM heavy artillery, and such is in short supply.  Harpending and Whitney were examples of appropriate individuals; Cochran, Lynn, and Rushton are/were laughable popguns. The latter are what Harpending dismissed as “true believers” – not real scientists (although Harpending tragically wasted his time taking the likes of Cochran seriously).

As I’ve written here before, the problem is that the Right seems inherently hostile to genuine science; thus, it has problems attracting STEM people to begin with and, then, if any are attracted, it has even more trouble retaining them.  Now, it would seem like the Left would have the same problem; after all, the Left is even more pseudoscientific than is the Right.  But the Left has certain advantages: it’s superficially anti-religious, rational, secular, and materialist nature is more compatible with the scientific mind, and, paradoxically, the Left’s reality as a faux religion, full of irrational dogma (albeit masquerading as secular rationalism), provides the motive force for fanatical adherence.  Thus, the Left attracts scientists with its secular and rational veneer, and then holds on to them by infecting them with the religious fervor of SJWism.  The Right on the other hand, with its irrational, mystical, non-materialist, religious veneer of “traditionalist” nonsense is not attractive to the scientific mind, and then the weakness and bourgeoisie values of the Right cannot even keep those scientists who are attracted, cannot retain them as solid adherents because there is no attractive ideological base to form the basis of fanatical adherence.  The Right is a two-time loser in this regard.

Also, of course, the Left has the System behind it, in fact it IS the System, and as such has all sorts of goodies to bestow on scientists who toe the line.  On the other hand, the Far Right has what to offer?  Ridicule?  Social pricing? Colleagues who are semi-retarded nitwits and purveyors of pseudoscientific garbage?

Advertisements

Blackpill Thursday

Alt Right terminology to mock the Alt Right.

The Turd Alliance. I can’t help notice how the HBD low-life scum all support each other and pat each other on the back: Derbyshire, Zman, Cochran…Cochran may in fact be the worst of the bunch.  Harpending’s biggest error in judgment was getting involved in with that thing to begin with.  And, oh yes, let’s all get so very excited about Cochran’s “physics” background – as if he’s the only one who has ever written about race from the “Right” with a STEM background.

Another example of a network supporting their own:

Sessions has accomplished quite a lot as Attorney General.

And what link was provided to support that ludicrous contention?  This one, I kid you not. So, one justifies lickspittle support for Quota Queen Antifa Jeff Sessions by linking to exactly the same unfounded lickspittle support, this time coming from Quota King Mudshark Annie.

You just can’t make this stuff up.

Yes, a legend.  So, let’s all worship Trump based on his offhand comments, tweets, and “negs” – not for actually doing anything to help White Americans.  No, instead we get pardoning of Negro criminals, bragging about “the low Black and Hispanic unemployment rate,” Neocon foreign policy, and, of course, no “Wall” or any other kind of real immigration enforcement.  We also get Trump signing legislation targeting pro-White activists, while his Attorney General is de facto legal counsel for Antifa.

Roissy:

pps antitrust, ag sessions. Stop sitting on your southern gentleman hands

Don’t worry.  If Sessions can in some way invoke antitrust to harm White interests, he’ll do so.  Go after anti-White tech companies?  Nah…what would his friends at Antifa think?

And why shouldn’t pink-frilled Republican Graham be a Trump ally, especially since the “God Emperor’s” actual actions are converging on the Graham/McCain worldview?

To answer this questionNO.  

Hmmm…who is in charge of federal law enforcement these days?

Yeah…they’re “waking up.”  Germans put Merkel back into power and in Sweden, the milquetoast “Far Right” gets less than 20% of the vote.  But, hey, there were some isolated marches in the former East Germany, so it’s all OK!  Let’s all declare victory and go home…after all, I’m sure there’s some articles to write about that high, high, high Jewish and Chinese IQ, and about dumb Afrowops and Romanians.

Counter-Currents commentator gets it:

An Gal Gréine
Posted September 12, 2018 at 11:51 am | Permalink
Seriously? The EU parliament is a toothless joke, and this is the same Nigel Farage who labeled a sizable chunk of his own party membership ‘nazis’ over their — entirely well founded — concerns on Islam, promoted that clown Bolton, and split UKIP. The man is the very model of a modern politician. And this whole farce with Hungary is a dog and pony show which suits both Orbán and the leftists twats attempting to Article 7 Hungary. It’s all self-promotion on both sides.

The growing attachment between Russia and China should upset both the Putin fanboys in Der Movement, as well as the Russian-hating, anti-White Silker filth.

No doubt half-Tuvan Shoigu would like close relations with China, what with his own close genetic relations with East Asia.

Oh, and Putin is speaking out these days against “protectionism” and in favor of the “global economy.”

Now, who has been skeptical about Trad Vlad?

Der Movement (including the Silkers): always wrong

Sallis: always right

And you can count on that

Endless Debunking

Taking out the trash is good, no doubt, but there’s more to life than trash.

Let’s see now – a HBD “race realist” is opposed to pan-Europeanism and is hostile to White ethnics.  Will wonders never cease?  New breaking news: the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.  Shocking! Unprecedented!

Seriously though, see this.  That goes into the whole problem of confusing descriptive and prescriptive memes, as well as the problem in getting descriptives wrong in the first place.

And it goes deeper than this, to the very heart of the issue: EGI vs. HBD; Salter stressing genetic kinship (i.e., EGI) over some sort of hierarchical ranking of phenotypic traits (i.e., HBD).

Not surprisingly, HBDers are typically hostile to “Salterism.”  HBD is a political movement dedicated to destroying White nationalism, with a long term goal of establishing polities ruled by Jews and Asians, with “First World White strains” as a subaltern stepandfetchit caste (and their woman as concubines for Jews and Asians).  Now, that’s not what the HBDers overtly preach of course, and many of them would genuinely reject that proposition – but it doesn’t matter if the outcome is intentional or not; regardless, the eventual outcome of HBD politics will be the same whether it is from mendacity or just plain stupidity.

Interestingly, despite the fact that HBD is incompatible with WN, the “movement” has a strong HBD faction.  Why so?  Well, first, Der Movement activists are not too bright.  Second, HBDers try to appeal to “First World strain” WNs by, essentially, patting them on the head and telling them how very, very Hajnal they all are.  You’re part of the cogelite crowd, my friends!  Ego-stroking is a powerful tool of memetic seduction.  Third, many so-called WNs are not really racial nationalists at all, not in the way it is properly defined.  These people support Whites only because they view Whites as the embodiment of certain traits; one can remember Jobling being a “pro-White activist” because Whites actualize Rawlsian liberalism.

So, there’s a lot of confusion and ideological incoherence in Der Movement (expected given the predominance of brain-addled Type I activists). Further, given the presence of a strong HBD faction along with a strong Nordicist faction (with some overlap between those groups), we have a situation that Der Movement really has not much of anything to offer to White ethnics.  Racial nationalism however does indeed have much to offer to those groups; indeed, everything to offer, if survival is the ultimate interest (i.e., genetic continuity).

It is important not to confuse Der Movement with the concept of racial nationalism.  An analogy would be the error of confusing the Republican Party has being the same as conservatism.  No, the former is merely a vehicle for the latter, and a poor vehicle at that.  Similarly, Der Movement is a pitifully pathetic vehicle for genuine racial nationalism, and a new vehicle is desperately required.

And, really, the amount of digital ink spilled over this tragicomic freak Faulk is disturbing.  There are so any other things of importance to discuss and analyze that to waste time and effort on someone who is essentially speaking a different language, with a different and incompatible worldview is, frankly, disgusting.  Why not tackle some of Salter’s more recent writings and analyses, for example?

Or, formulate your own worldview, instead of constantly “debunking” every memetic trash spewed forth from every and piece of flotsam and jetsam with an Internet connection.

There comes a time to advance and defend a strongly held position, a concrete and substantial worldview, instead of merely critiquing strawman misrepresentations of what others misconstrue what your position is (or should be).  I’m guilty of this as well, to be honest.  Certainly, this blog can benefit from more “what should be done” posts instead of “don’t do this.”

One final point for this post.  It is a strawman representation of White nationalism to assert that WNs consider all Whites as part of their ingroup, they want every single White person as part of their erthnostate.  No, every White person is potentially a part of the ingroup, but that depends on the people themselves as well. I’m not interested in SJW Whites, and am certainly not interested in White HBDers and other trash.  Yes, we can try and convince, but in the end, why should we want to accept enemies?  The idea is ludicrous.

Welton: Absolutely Despicable

Welton the fraud.  In all cases emphasis added.

Sallis right once again: Der Movement Inc. whitewashing Rushton the Fraud.

I like how this turd makes it seem like Dutton’s book is wholly supportive of Rushton and Rushton’s “theories.”  If that is the case, why are Rushton’s hysterical fans attacking Dutton and his book on Amazon, eh Welton you despicable mendacious dishonest scum? But what do you expect from fundamentally dishonest HBD?

Here is the liar Welton again trying to make it seem that Dutton (*) was supportive of Rushton and was giving explanations to explain “anomalies”:

Dutton’s book makes sense of anomalies with the model, arguing that as a group becomes more K-selected, it becomes more evolved to an extremely specific niche.

Is there any way of accounting for these counterexamples to Rushton’s theory? Michael Woodley and his colleagues have argued that as a race or species adopts a slower Life History Strategy, the traits that make up that strategy will correlate less closely with one another. In Dutton’s words:

Under conditions of intense selection—of the kind experienced by Northeast Asians—you end up with a very high-K group and thus extreme specialization and a weak relationship between K traits. So, we would expect them to be less K than Europeans on some measures. It is likely that, in a very harsh ecology, a group which was highly cooperative but also hostile to outsiders (breeding with whom would only be maladaptive because the children would be less adapted to the harsh ecology) would have been more likely to survive. Foreigners also potentially undermine community trust, particularly crucial for extreme K-strategists.

So the anomalies Dutton reports are by no means beyond the possibility of evolutionary explanation, but Rushton neglected to mention them altogether. Dutton considers this cherry-picking of the evidence on Rushton’s part, whether conscious or unconscious.

Dutton occasionally overstates his case: e.g., when describing Rushton as a “pathological liar.” The examples of Rushton’s dishonesty he cites appear motivated either by bias in favor of his theory or a desire to conceal the less creditable aspects of his personal life or family history.

Contra Welton’s indirect implication, others like Woodley tried to explain Rushton’s errors using “just so” stories and other spin; Dutton himself was generally critical, hence the hysterical attacks against Dutton by Rushton’s supporters.  And as regards the arguments of “Michael Woodley and his colleagues” together with Welton’s screed – notice how Welton cherry picks dementia findings to support Rushton, but when other traits don’t fit the theory, we get hand-waving hypotheses of “intense selection” causing a “weak relationship between K traits.”  

Well, if there is a “weak relationship” between the very traits that define Rushton’s theory, then what is the point of the theory to begin with?  Any and all anomalies can be explained away in this fashion.  Therefore, Rushton’s hypothesis is not falsifiable and therefore it is no longer science – in other words, when data fit the theory, then the theory is supported, and when data contradict the theory, that also supports the theory because of, in this case, “intense selection” causing “weak relationships.”  That’s the essence of HBD – a pseudoscience that refuses to even acknowledge the possibility of being wrong, a pseudoscience impossible of falsification because even contradictory data – when not overtly ignored – is “spun away” as more support of the very hypotheses the data actually refute.

HBD is merely politics supporting Whites being enslaved by Jews and Asians. And Rushton was, according to Dutton, a race-mixer, a cuckolder, an adulterer, and a cherry picker (at best; and a “pathological liar” at worst) of data.  To Welton to excuse that by saying “that’s what geniuses do” and then, in the grand HBD fashion, cherry picking data to cite a few examples (Rushton – the HBD Einstein), is laughably stupid and morally obtuse.

*Technically, yes, “Dutton’s book” makes the case by citing the opinions of Rushtonite spin doctors, but let us be honest: casual readers pf Welton’s article will assume that Dutton himself was supportive, rather than just quoting those others.  Welton’s whole piece is misleading.

HBD and the Rushton Case

Continuing my discussion of the Rushton fiasco.

Let’s continue our analysis of the Rushton case and what it says about HBD.

An important point that needs to be made: just because Rushton was a disgusting and despicable excuse for a human being, and, according to Dutton, fudged data and interpretations, does not logically imply that r-k theory as regards humans (or more properly, hominids – or australopithecines?) is not correct in its broadest sense.

The thing is, contra fawning “movement” fanboys, the whole r-k theory isn’t particularly innovative or earth-shattering.  It is actually quite obvious. Indeed, back in the 1980s – many years before I ever heard of Rushton and his work – I was reading an ecology textbook, came across a discussion of r-k life strategies, and immediately – emphasis on immediately – realized that this can apply to “humans” as well, with Blacks and Hispanics being “r” and Whites and (East) Asians being “k.”

Now, Rushton certainly deserves credit for coming out and publicly stating the hypothesis, and credit he does get here for that.  The problem with these HBD types is that they fall in love with their own theories, and descend into laughable pseudoscience, and sometimes outright fraud, in order to hysterically defend those hypotheses, rather than subject them to rigorous hypothesis testing, as the Popperian scientific method would suggest.  No, these guys are hyper-Kuhnians, and will defend the dogma at all costs.

An example is the IQ-GDP correlation, what Lynn has been banging the drum about for decades.  The idea that there would be a correlation between national IQ and national GDP – just as there is between individual IQ and personal income/wealth – is obvious, even trivial.  But – and this is a big but – that’s at a very coarse-grained, looking from a distance, view.  When one looks more fine-grained, looks at the details, looks up close, one finds exceptions, many outliers, cases that defy the dogmatic explanation, alternative mechanisms that sometimes better explain the data, etc.  Upon rigorous testing, the strict interpretation of the hypothesis is proven wrong, the hypothesis, in its most strict and fine-grained sense, is falsified.  However, it remains valid as a very general principle, and has some utility in that sense.  But that’s not good enough for these types, with their absurd spin, invented just-so stories, ignoring of contradictory data, “estimates” of IQ rather than reproducible direct measurements, and absolute refusal to even admit the possibility of being wrong about even the most trivial cases.  That’s pseudoscience, that’s HBD.

The same applies to r-k.  In the very broad sense, it is probably true – but even then requires constant and rigorous testing – but it obviously breaks down when one looks at the details.  In some cases, in some details, in some traits, Negroes may be k-selected, and Chinamen r-selected; rather than admit this, Rushton ignored the facts that “went against the general trend.”  Like all HBDers he never even considered the possibility he could be wrong, and never really took opposing views seriously.  The opposition you see was “politically motivated” and “personally motivated” – as if the same could not be said about Rushton himself and all the other HBDers themselves.

Life is messy – Rushton’s life is a perfect example: compare the details of his personal life to what his work was about and to the ideals fervently believed in by “movement” Rushtonites.  It’s almost as if Pierce had married a Jew, or Duke was discovered to have half-Black children.  I won’t even mention the actual realty of Strom Thurmond here.  Life is messy and so life science – including social science (if it is even really a science) – is messy as well.  Let’s not pretend it isn’t and by so doing leave open vulnerable spots in our views that can be attacked by the Left.

The ultimate problem is that HBD in its stupidity and pseudoscience smears genuine racial science, since the two are conflated by the Left and by the general public.  Thus, when Rushton is (justifiably) discredited, it reflects badly on all of us, not only where it belongs – solely on the HBD scum.

If the Right had any sense of being right (no pun intended) they would denounce Rushton, not only for what the specifically did but also because of the damage the inevitable revelations have on the cause.  His work needs to be critically examined more than ever, and that work shown to be based on fraud and/or bad science should be denounced and withdrawn.

Saturday Movement Roundup

A wide variety of nonsense.  In all cases, emphasis added.

From Majority Rights:

Then again, where Cochran suggests that Jewry should take over Italy (because it is “easy to do” based on their record in WWII) instead of being Zionists, and inhabiting that barren and unappealing land in the Middle East, I need to muster the largest NO THANKS! that I can to that suggestion.

You know, I often make sarcastic comments about HBDers, such as that they would like to replace the hated Afrowops with Jews and Chinamen.  Apparently, Sallis is prescient even with sarcasm, since the HBDers actually prescribe such a course of action.

Once again: HBD is a purely political movement dedicated to advancing the interests of Jews and Asians.  And, yes, there will also be “Aryan” traitors willing to take Unzian thirty pieces of shekels to promote the HBD creed.  We also observe another attribute of HBDism: the animus toward so-called “White ethnics.”  

I suppose the HBD dream world can be described thus: Jewish and Asian overlords, subaltern Nordic serfs (the women being used as sex slaves for Jews and Asians), with the swarthoids and hunkies of Europe eliminated.

Yellow Fever makes you stupid.  Either Sallis is on a roll, predicting reality, or reality is on a roll, actualizing Sallisian memes.  You choose.

Amren comment:

Crazycat • 2 hours ago
Chinese supposedly have some of the highest I.Q.’s on the earth, but somehow they still need to steal white technology. Fascinating……

More Durocher.

Two things. First, lest we forget, the great and good Andrew Hamilton was hostile to Shakespeare because too many of his plays took place in swarthoid areas.  I kid you not.

Second:

For most of us however, the answer is simple: find a young woman of beauty and good character, beget and educate fine children, that you and your nation live on in them!

I assume Durocher has taken his own advice here?  

Lothrop born again:

Lothrop Stoddard
‏@StoddardLothrop
 13h13 hours ago
More
Sarah Jeong is a good argument against legal, skilled hi-IQ immigration from Asia.  Immigrants may come here just to work and be productive, but their kids get into the hate-whitey university system and end up indulging their little resentments and insecurities as race warfare.

No, no, a thousand times no!  What will the Silkers say?  Isn’t she a potential border guard of the west?

Who’s an alpha male?

irina
It’s fascinating to see this from a male perspective. As a woman who sees the difference immediatly between an alpha and a beta, I have a slightly different explanation.
When I’m with my friends, and we are introduced to a new male, we all individually assess his status. Because we have varied tastes and interests, it is very rare that one man manages to blow all of us away. We are all varied in attractiveness, intellect, cultural background, and income. The alphiest alpha is the guy who can meet and exceed all of our expectations.
Obviously, there have been very few men who have done thsi [sic], but here are several examples:
1) Mr. L: Mr. L is 6’4, very broad, athletic, and rugged looking. He had managed to hook up with at least 4 girls in my immediate circle of friends. Because he had such a great character, none of us had any hard feelings about him not wanting to actually date any of us. We just accepted it, because he was good looking and nice. Mr. L has a very large penis, though I do not know from experience. Mr. L is decently intelligent, and is so confident and kindhearted that even my most intellectually-inclined friends did not mind. Sophomore year of college he fell in love with one of my (very beautiful, kind, and intelligent) good friends, and they have recently gotten married. Overall his alphaness is a sum of the following: natural confidence (not cockiness), him clearly being the most dominant man in the room, good looks, large size, great personality, no hang ups about ever being a beta because he was never one, and amazing heart.
2) Mr. M: Mr. M is also tall, quite handsome in a pretty boy way, and also very kind. He has been my ex boyfriend’s best friend since high school. One night three of my girl friend’s met him at bar, and individually decided that he was above and beyond the alphiest of the guys they’d seen all night. He engages you in a conversation, he pays attention to your every word, and he took great care to make sure we all got home safe. He is a natural- he does not do anything just to get girls, because the girls flock to him regardless of what he does. Again, his alphaness can be summed up: good looks, height, attention to detail, the fact that he is a very good friend, and amazing heart.
3) Mr. D: I have known Mr. D since I was like 15 because he took violin lessons with my little sister. He is tall, dark, and handsome. His parents make him work for his tuition, violin lessons, dorm, etc. Because he wanted to fit in with American boys, he adopted the typical cool/macho attitude of fratty mcdouches. A lot of women find this attitude quite sexy, I do not. However, once a girl sits down and talk to him and discovers how humble and hard-working he is, she is bound to fall for him. His girlfriends are always 9s and 10s. Alphaness: looks, confidence, humility, and an amazing heart. Again, I give him an A- in alpha for the cockiness, but that’s just a personal pet peeve.
Notice what both of these guys have in common- they are kind men, because they never have to act like jerks to get women. I have many other examples if you want me to share, but I think you get the point: most women can totally smell if your confidence is substantial or if it’s a front. To be the alphiest alpha, it has to be genuine and have had to have been that way for his whole life. I’m sure the converted betas do quite well, but not as well.

Now, consider:

Notice what both of these guys have in common…

Yes, all tall and “rugged looking” or “quite handsome” or “handsome.”  Contra Roissy’s (self-interested?) mantra that male looks are not very important for alphaness, if you ignore the odd outliers and look at general trends, then alphas will be one or more of the following: (1) tall and good-looking, (2) rich and/or a celebrity, (3) someone who picks up SMV points for racial reasons – e.g., White females swooning over Negro half-apes, or boy-bodied Asiatrices swooning over White nerd Bill Gates look-a-likes (minus his wealth).

I also “notice” that this yeastbucket used the word “both” to describe three examples.  Well, women are not good at math, as we know.

…they are kind men…

Sure they are.  Particularly:

…he adopted the typical cool/macho attitude of fratty mcdouches…

followed by:

…they never have to act like jerks to get women.

Women are absolutely clueless.  They have less self-awareness than your typical bacterium.

Jew Gottfried – who rejects White nationalism (surprise!) – defends the ineptness of the Alt Right.

No one could have done better, you see.  Note very carefully how this works.  First, Der Movement’s strict ethnic affirmative action policy ensures that only Spencers, Johnsons, Taylors, et al. are “leadership.”  Then, after making sure that others are absolutely prevented from trying out their own ideas, then say “no one could have done any better.”  Imagine an affirmative action slot for a job position.  The only people interviewed are, say, Negroes, and a Negro is hired.  The Negro typically screws up.  Then some HuWhite commentator tells us that “no one else could have done any better.”  Perhaps.  But we would never know unless they were given the opportunity, would we?

Rushton: The Rotten Empire Strikes Back

The pushback, lies, and spin about randy Blackjack Phil begins.

Absolute HBD scum try to salvage the reputation of the execrable race-mixing fraud Rushton by giving Dutton’s book bad reviews at Amazon.  Two examples are below, with my response.

This is a scholarly abomination, in which one of the worst “scientists” of recent times, Edward Dutton, endeavors to savage the reputation of the great J. Philippe Rushton. Dutton has hardly written a thing that wouldn’t cause anyone with an IQ over 115 to feel embarrassment for him. He is a blight on the HBD world with his sorry attempts at hereditarian research. Rushton, despite whatever personal flaws he may have had, left psychological science an original, important, and seminal body of theoretical and empirical work. By contrast, it seems Dutton’s sole notable effect in life has been to sully HBD with inane, maladroit, and logorrheic text. One must wonder how such an incompetent sees himself fit to accuse as fine a scientist as Rushton of academic misconduct.

First, and most importantly, is what Dutton wrote true or not?  If it is, then all this hysterical Type I defense of Rushton – himself the “scholarly abomination”- is so much hot air.  Second, how is it possible for anyone to “sully” HBD, when it is a laughably stupid pseudoscience, a pro-Jewish and pro-Asian political movement masquerading as “science?”  It’s no coincidence that so many HBDers have Jewish or Asian wives, girlfriends, or family members.  Rushton and his Jewish wife.  Derbyshire and Brand married to Asians.  Ray’s son involved in a relationship with an Asian.  Sailer once suggesting he had Jewish ancestry (his wife investigated his biological parents, according to a Sailer post from many years ago).  Hart and Levin are Jewish.  I don’t know about Lynn, but if he doesn’t have some sort of Jewish-Asian ties, he’s the exception that proves the rule.  Third, if Dutton is such a terrible scientist and an incompetent, then why does the “great man” himself – Richard Lynn – coauthor work with Dutton?  Does this reviewer consider Lynn to be a “scholarly abomination” as well (if so, perhaps the only good judgement shown by this reviewer)?

This book is trash. I knew Phil Rushton for a number of years, and he was a kind, honorable man, and a brilliant researcher.

Yeah, that’s great. But are Dutton’s accusations true?

Vintage Der Movement, Inc.  Hide from the truth.  Defend the good old boys network.  And be incredible hypocrites.  The hypocrisy is at many levels.  These guys like to quote Jefferson about valuing truth above all things and needing truth to be known by the world, but when it comes to criticizing Rushton (or Jews), then all of a sudden truth is out the window, and personal loyalty (or political expediency or monetary donations) is valued above all else.  In other cases though, personal loyalty is jettisoned, not for the sake of truth, but to peddle HBD lies.  The value of truth and of loyalty is on a sliding scale – as Sailer would say: Who?  Whom?  To defend a corrupt quota queen HBDer like Rushton, the personal loyalty triumphs and truth goes out the window.

Der Movement Inc. is absolutely despicable, utterly corrupt, skin-crawlingly loathsome, disgustingly degenerate, horrendously hypocritical, and based on a foundation of lies and corruption.  How could a cause so right and so pure be sullied by such absolute trash, such moral turds?