Category: homosexuals

Behold the Female, 9/15/16

Half the population is useless for anything other than sex and reproduction (and in many cases, not even for that).

Tim Gunn is right.  Homos know fashion.

Yahoo is full of stories like this – female navel-gazing about being “shamed” and acting like hysterical attention whores.  

To say that women behave like children is an insult to the intelligence and behavior of children.  Better to say that women act like deranged, mentally-retarded children.  Hence, a flaw in “game” – adult men are supposed to modify their every thought and action to appeal to hypergamic female airheads and retardates?

By the way, Roissy the stupid bastard needs to tell us where in nature the “handicap principle” works for the female of any species.

The Gay Community’s Trump Test

No excuse for “prejudice?”

Trump is undoubtedly the most pro-gay GOP Presidential candidate in recent history. Who else would have had Thiel making a speech talking about proudly being gay and talking about “false culture wars?’ Who else would have come our strongly in support of gay rights in their convention speech? Who else has a long, established history of these sort of pro-homosexual “New York values?”

Now, rightist apologists for gays state, or at least imply, that gay support for the anti-White, leftist agenda is in large part due to the association of “the Right” with anti-gay religious intolerance. Let “the Right” be more inclusive and then, problem solved.
Trump therefore is sort of a test. The test is so far not being passed:

For those hoping Trump’s nomination will improve the party’s reputation among gay rights proponents, there’s another challenge: Mainstream gay rights groups have denounced Trump, arguing that tolerance for one minority group doesn’t excuse prejudice toward others — like Hispanics and Muslims — or unflattering comments about women. 

His hatred toward anybody is a huge concern,” said Jay Brown of the Human Rights Campaign. “When he attacks women, he attacks us. When he attacks Muslims, he’s attacking us.

Emphasis added. Thus, the idea is that one must be tolerant of all minorities in order to be politically satisfactory to gays. If that’s the underlying idea there, then that community is inherently hostile to White racial nationalism, with parallels to the Jews being noteworthy.

O’Meara Again, 6/18/16

Clueless or deceptive?

It’s common enough on the Right to somewhat grudgingly acknowledge their role in the re-homesteading and revitalizing of blighted (usually by blacks) urban areas. The Right ruefully admits that for some reason, these limp-wristed sissies are able to resist the Black Undertow that drove out all those manly Olde Tyme White families.

Maybe because those “Olde Tyme White families” (note snarky tone) have something called children, and responsible parents don’t want to send their children to school with savage Negro apes, which is what I endured. And, maybe some of those “limp-wristed sissies” move to those areas because they are leftists who enjoy the “diversity” and become saddened that their gentrification diminishes it.

Gosh, could the “conservatives” be wrong? Perhaps all those childless men do have some role to play in reproduction and survival, at least in the reproduction of the past into the future and the survival of cities, not global consumerist playgrounds?

Oh, stop it already. How many times do you have to beat a dead horse? That horse looks like minced hamburger already. Yeah, we get it: you’re gay and want to be accepted. The problem I have with some homosexual WNs is the same as with Christian WNs: they put a non-EGI and non-racial identity above their EGI-based, racial identity. Thus, for both groups (ironic how they are lumped together like this), their religion or sexual identity is more important than race, ethnicity, or what have you.
Once again, Salter in On Genetic Interests said the basics: homosexuals (typically childless) have a greater proportion of their genetic interests invested in extended family and ethny. While promoting acceptance of themselves, they should also promote pro-natal memes and policies aimed at family and ethny, to enhance their genetic interests.

Der Movement in the News, 6/6/16

Three items.

This raises another, subtle point (though I doubt McCrean notices). The homosexual is often the homophobic Right’s favorite straw man for “those with no concern for future generations.”[28] And yet isn’t the Right — the non-libertarian, at least — concerned above all with the past, and the preservation thereof? In a word, archeofuturism?

I’m relatively uninterested in the “homosexual question,” and find the “gay baiting” in Der Movement (*) both tiresome and politically or personally motivated (**). But O’Meara here goes too far. No, I – a person of the “Right” – don’t give a goddamn about the dead past and I am uninterested in preserving past failure. Further, the whole breathless “rightist” excitement over archeofuturism leaves me cold as I see it as a juvenile, “dungeons and dragons” sort of fantasy – what someone like Faye wants, not what is a realistic or desirable outcome. And, while it may be just a swarthoid defect, I could never understand the “rightist” fascination with all this “Lord of the Rings” and “Hobbit” nonsense.  
And what is most tiresome is all this pro-gay “mannerbund” propaganda.

Some advice for gays in Der Movement:

1. Read Salter’s On Genetic Interests, particularly the brief section on homosexuals. Homosexuals have genetic interests like everyone else and since they typically do not have their own biological children, the importance of ethny (and of course extended family) is even greater for them than for heterosexuals. Therefore, an adaptive-minded homosexual should promote – not oppose – future-looking, pro-natalist attitudes and policies for their ethny, they should promote traditional heterosexual marriage and family formation, and they should place loyalty to ethny ahead of loyalty to their sexual preferences. But just like those who place Christianity above race, the gays place their sexual freedom and identity above race.
2. Be realistic – the most you can expect from the more tolerant factions of the heterosexual far-right is tolerance and not enthusiastic acceptance, much less promotion. Likely, the more tolerant faction is represented by someone like myself: who finds homosexuality personally distasteful, wishes it did not exist, but who is willing to look the other way on it and accept far-right gays who essentially “stay in the closet” and who otherwise behave normally apart from their sexual behavior. But if the gays are going to constantly push and annoy even the more tolerant heterosexuals, the whole thing will not end well. If you annoy and alienate those willing to accept you then you’ll be left with nothing and no one.
* And no, talking about activists’ “homoerotic fixation on Trump” is not “gay baiting.” I do not call people like the hedonistic womanizer Roissy homosexual, I merely point out that their unhealthy fixations on Trump the Man border on the homoerotic. Just telling it like it is.
** I’ve written on this before. There are (credible) rumors about certain “august” “movement” personages – rumors that have even filtered down to someone as disconnected to Der Movement as myself. But one never hears openly and publicly about these people because those precincts of Der Movement most prone to gay baiting either share the same ideology as these “august personages” or they have no personal feud with them. Any principled opposition to homosexuality in White activism would include speaking out against those people whose “closet door” is so open even dumb swarthoids like I notice it. But then the only thing consistent about Der Movement is its hypocrisy.

But while normies, as a rule, veer away from dangers and challenges, and err on the side of unctuous smarm and disingenuous civility when it comes to choosing Presidential candidates, they are by no means attached to a single unvarying course of action. They are also capable of more animated responses when it becomes apparent that this is the necessary course.

Like after Rotherham? After Cologne? After Trump rallies degenerate into outbursts of leftist/minority violence? Truth be told, I’m beginning to wonder if there is anything that would stimulate a White resistance. If our present government would announce that all White Americans are to be exterminated, and should report to the local internment camp for “processing,” the likely reaction would be for humble Whites, with heads downturned, dutifully lining up for elimination, with every other White cuck wearing a “Black Lives Matter” or “I’m With Her” or “Feel the Bern” t-shirt. I’d like any of these “alt-rightists” to paint a picture of a realistic scenario that leads to a mass White resistance.

We see this already with many Trump supporters, most of whom are just semi-redpilled normies, and we will see it with more conservatives, Christians, or people of the “middling sort” who initially “didn’t quite care” for Donald Trump’s tone, as they see Mexican mobs egging White women and Black Lives Matter activists trying to cripple police horses.

We see nothing. They say nothing and they do nothing. 

The often repeated analogy with 1968, when Black and Leftist violence contributed to the Nixon landslide, is a good one. Once again, a fight started by leftists will finish at the ballot boxes in their utter defeat. Let us hope that this time the defeat runs even deeper, to the very roots of the Left. It is part of the work of the Alt Right to ensure that it does.

And what is the “Alt Right” actually doing to “ensure that it does?” Practically speaking, nothing. I’ve previously outlined pragmatic and plausible activities that the “right” could pursue to take advantage of the Trump phenomenon and as far as I can see nothing at all is being done (apart from Roissy breathlessly analyzing Trump’s every macho utterance and every alpha hand gesture).

I haven’t been able to find any definitive information online about Steyer’s ancestry, although he does not seem to be in any way Jewish. Lind, Lind, where art thou, Lind? Of course Der Movement would be concerned about whether Steyer is a “Mormon” – or a “high-trust hunter-gatherer.”

Meet Pietro Aretino

An unsavory swarthoid.

Pietro Aretino (20 April 1492 – 21 October 1556) was an Italian author, playwright, poet, satirist and blackmailer who wielded immense influence on contemporary art and politics and invented modern literate pornography…Aretino prospered, living from hand to mouth as a hanger-on in the literate circle of his patron, sharpening his satirical talents on the gossip of politics and the Papal Curia, and turning the coarse Roman pasquinade into a rapier weapon of satire, until his sixteen ribald Sonetti Lussuriosi (Lust Sonnets) written to accompany Giulio Romano’s exquisitely beautiful but utterly pornographic series of drawings engraved by Marcantonio Raimondi under the title I Modi finally caused such outrage that he had to temporarily flee Rome…He was a lover of men; having declared himself a sodomite since birth.

Gay Genes?

Always single genes?

On a thread from a Counter-Currents post about homosexuality, a commentator writes:

If “gayness” (i.e. total unambiguous homosexuality) is genetic, then how is it passed from generation to generation? Clearly whoever was carrying this gene wasn’t too gay to be making babies. Either that or society up until now has forced them to, thus inadvertently ensuring their survival. 

I’m not sure why people always assume that complex human behaviors are always the result of a single gene, or a small number of genes – just like the HBDers and their postulated “gene(s) for altruism.” The above comment is a case in point. Now, it is possible that homosexuality is due to a single gene or a small number of genes that is/are under direct selection.

However, it is equally possible – and probably more likely – that homosexual behaviors, to the extent that they are genetic, are due to the coinheritance of a number (likely more than a few) gene alleles, AND that these alleles may be maintained in the population for reasons other than homosexuality.

As theoretical examples: alleles coding for femininity in women which when inherited by sons increases chances for being gay, or genes for masculinity in men when inherited by daughters increases the probability of being a butch lesbian, or genes for creativity/aesthetic sense, which could be favorably selected for in some modern societies but which may also incline toward gayness.  

So, a man inheriting, say, a mix of femininity genes and artistic genes and some other genes – all of which are adaptive on their own in specific environments – may have a  greater chance of being homosexual. 

In this way,a tendency toward homosexuality is an unavoidable emergent property – a side effect if you will – of happening to inherit a constellation of gene alleles that are present in populations because they are adaptive for other reasons not having anything directly to do with homosexuality.

This is a hypothesis that may be right or wrong, but is just as likely as “gay genes” or “gay uncle fitness” or “gayness as a result of viral infections.”

Jeff Passan, Virulent Racist


While I’m not much interested in sports, I do realize that it is part of modern pop culture and therefore exerts influence on racial and civilizational matters.

In general, the new crop of White sportswriters tend to be far-left, anti-White, snarky assholes, jock-sniffing the colored athlete, with an ill-disguised contempt for Whites, the traditional White America, and the past history – the White history – of the sports they cover.

Jeff Passan ranks among the worst.

About a mixed-race Hispanic, he writes:

Jose Bautista, baseball’s leading home run hitter since 2010, a deeply intelligent, obsessively competitive, bilingual clubhouse leader, a testament to hard work and perseverance, is the exact sort of person the game would kill to have more of.

About a retired White star player he writes:

Goose Gossage, a giant bag of gas that somehow figured out how to grow a mustache…

If Gossage doesn’t like it anymore, he’s more than welcome to stop watching. Baseball has enough fans who are old, white men.

That’s great, Passan.  In a few decades, you’ll be a “old white man” and at that time you can stop with sports, and leave that to the vibrant young coloreds who’ll be mugging and beating you every time you fearfully step outside your prison-like apartment fortress.

Also Passan, from googling you, I see you have a homoerotic fixation on one “Mike Trout,” who is apparently White.  For shame!  Aren’t there plenty of diverse colored athletes to get all hot and bothered over?  Jose for example?

I’ll let Caste Football and those types, with a greater interest in sports, take over the critique from here.