Category: homosexuals

Counter-Currents Goes Full Retard

The Counter-Currents threat.

Absolute Nordicist crap coming from the HBD “West Coast White nationalism” Counter-Currents blog.

Today, less than half of Greek Y-chromosomes are of European origin…

Imbecilic.  Whose definition of “European Y chromosomes” are you using? 

See here.  Let me guess – NRY found at high levels in Northern Europe are “European.” Those found at higher levels in Southern Europe are – of course! – “non-European.”  In fact, note that while there are differing frequencies, on a qualitative level there is overlap between the major types between North and South.

The cities St. Paul visited in his missionary travels and to which he wrote – Corinth, Thessalonica, and Athens – were no more necessarily Greek than New York City is Dutch because Dutchmen lived there three hundred years ago.

The Kempian argument.  Unfortunately, population genetics doesn’t agree, as the ancient Minoans and Mycenaeans were genetically most similar to modern Southern Europeans, including modern Greeks, with a major difference being that modern Greeks have some degree of Slavic admixture.

And then:

The results of mass immigration and racial intermarriage can be seen in portraits that survived the destruction of the Italian resort-town of Pompeii in the first century AD. By that time, Roman women were dying their hair blonde and using lead acetate to make their skin whiter, in an effort to mimic the appearance of the original Romans and the few surviving noble families. Regardless of what the citizenship rolls said at any given time, centuries of population transfer had made true Romans so rare as to be statistically insignificant.

In response, see this.  We have to await the official publication, but I doubt it’ll match Nordicist expectations. By the way, ancient Etruscan phenotypes represented at that time as shown here.

Counter-Currents is openly lying to you  

Counter-Currents is peddling the same rancid “movement” dogma, which is being disproved by science, and that has no historical validity whatsoever.

It is obvious that Counter-Currents is becoming a nexus of the worst aspects of the “movement” – sweaty ethnic fetishism, tin cup panhandling, homosexual apologia, and backwards “traditionalism.” The destructive nature of the Counter-Currents infestation of racial activism is going to have to be a focus of the EGI Notes agenda.  We’ll need to take a closer look at this den of grifters, HBD traitors, fetishists, and perverts.

Advertisements

A Duel of Wits

Between unarmed opponents.

See this.

There is some good here, but also considerable nonsense. If the characterization of Richard Spencer’s racial views is correct, then Johnson’s racial views are sounder from an empiricist-materialist standpoint. However, there is much lacking here from a more hardcore scientific standpoint (the wages of “Traditionalism” I suppose). 

The whole “transplanted brains” scenario is absurd and meaningless intellectual masturbation.  What could one do? There are racial – and subracial (cue Durocher’s heavy breathing) – differences in brain structure that can be identified via imaging methodology.  If one were really determined to obtain a definitive identification, a small brain biopsy can yield DNA to assay for genetic ancestry and thus prove whether or not the brain tissue was of Negro origin. As far as the ridiculous question as to why build a community on race instead of other characteristics, I point both interviewer and interviewee to Salter’s On Genetic Interests. Adaptive fitness is the ultimate interest of evolved organisms (such as humans), and any group that promotes their ultimate interests will outcompete and replace those who do not. And, after all, one can always form these narrower communities within your racial group while preserving EGI, but the opposite is not possible.  One can form your little group of Tolkien fans among Whites in an all-White ethnostate, but a multi-racial Tolkien group that is not stratified by race (by definition, if it is multiracial and stratified only by Tolkienism, it will not be stratified by race) will constitute a loss of genetic interest.  Smaller groups within a White ethnostate will retain the advantages of a concentrated EGI; on the other hand, smaller groups of Whites in, say, a multiracial Tolkien Fanboy state, will suffer as a result of a loss of EGI, itself a consequence of the multiracialism of such a state. In the latter case, the situation can be retrieved only by racial separation – so why not  divide on the basis of race to begin with?

Stupidity about gender-specific nations also fails – I remember Bowery writing (correctly) long ago that gender/sex is not a genetic interest.  A man has more genetic commonality with female relatives and co-ethnics than with male non-ethnic strangers. One could subdivide a racially pure state by gender (for what purpose?) but the racial stratification must come first if one is concerned with biological fitness. If you are not concerned with fitness, fine, but that’s not an evolutionarily stable situation. You’ll end up in the dustbin of genetic history, replaced by more ethnocentric others. These are reasonably obvious arguments.  I would also point out that sexual reproduction has evolutionary advantages via increased genetic diversity. No doubt that a sufficiently advanced technology could artificially impose independent assortment and recombination on a single-sex artificial reproduction regimen, but, again, for what purpose?  While eliminating the yeastbucket requirement would no doubt be advantageous in many ways, what would be the sexual outlet for such an all-male society?  Widespread homosexuality?  I’ll take a pass on that. There are probably some things best left unchanged in human nature and the division between two sexes for reproduction is likely to be one of those.

And what’s with this obsession with Rushton and Lynn?  Look, the broad theories of both of them are likely true, but that’s as far as it goes. R-K theory on race (that I independently came up with in the 1980s after reading an ecology textbook) is undoubtedly true on the general level of – Blacks and Browns have more offspring and invest less in them; Whites and Yellows have fewer offspring but invest more in them. And, as well, Blacks and Browns have faster life histories (earlier maturation and reproduction and earlier death) than do Whites and Yellows. If Rushton had stuck with that, instead of trying to shoehorn every racial characteristic (including penis size) into the formulation, he’d be more respected today. Likewise, Lynn is likely correct that there is a general association between national IQ and economic productivity (as measured by GDP) and general accomplishment; the problem occurs when he falls too much in love with his theory (as did Rushton with his ideas) and tries to fit every data point into the pattern, with ludicrous “estimates of IQ,” racial history fairy tales about admixture, and hand waving “just so stories” to explain anomalies. The problem, I suppose, is that the broad theories are a bit too obvious and common sense, plain to any reasonably intelligent and honest observant individual, and so there isn’t much “intellectual prestige” in merely stating the obvious.  Therefore, ego-driven “intellectuals” have to build castles of sand to demonstrate how very clever they are.

Counter-Currents commentary:

Craig
Posted July 1, 2019 at 8:07 am | Permalink
Yang was a joke who never should have had any support from the Dissident Right in the first place. Those who did have made public fools of themselves.

Craig, meet Greg Johnson. And Richard Spencer. And many more.

Also, what’s the big deal about Gabbard? Oh she’s good on foreign policy. But so is Trump. He not once, but twice, averted war by outmaneuvering the warhawks in DC. First with Syria and now with Iran. He’s the peace candidate you should be voting for.

There’s no reason to pay attention to any of these clowns with a (D) in front of their name.

Craig, meet David Duke.  And Richard Spencer.

Then there’s John Morgan:

John Morgan
Posted July 1, 2019 at 6:33 am | Permalink
Rep. Gabbard seems to be the least bad (notice I’m not saying good) of all these people. It’s also worth mentioning her connections to/support of Hindu nationalist groups in India like the BJP and RSS (since she is a practicing Hindu herself). This doesn’t necessarily equate to sympathy for nationalism for white people, but it suggests she may at least have the vision to not be completely averse to it. In practice that may not mean much, however. But as Mr. Hampton wrote, she has no chance of getting the nomination this time around, anyway.

You know she supports reparations for Negroes, right?

A one, a one, a one two three….

Ted Cruz at least spoke up about this.  Antifa Don Trump, The God Emperor?  Silence.

MAGA!  Pepe! Kek!

Readers of this blog know that I am no apologist for homosexuals (of either sex) but I’m no apologist for hypocrisy either.  I mean, really….  Apparently, “homophobia” – “vile” or otherwise – is perfectly acceptable in the service of “movement” feuds.  Perhaps, Antifa can be critiqued in other ways than their penchant for sending gay Asians to the hospital.

The Yang Problem and Other Issues

In der news.

This is affirmative action on display.  Sigh…the point is not that there are “strings attached” if an activist receives his $1000 per month handout (but after all the recent deplatforming, and the direction this country is going in, you’d be foolish to think that the UBI would never be cut off to public activists). The point is that Yang’s plan is meant to buy off White anger (to the extent that this anger exists or will exist in the future) over their dispossession. The point is not that Yang’s plan poses a danger to activists, but instead that his plan is a danger to the ability of activists to recruit from the White masses The point is, a la Salter, that we want multiculturalism NOT to work, not make it work more smoothly through “a minority-majority America is A-OK as long as some of my tax money is funneled back to me (and to the endless stream of invaders Yang supports) via UBI.”

“Movement” leaders are as “deep” as a piece of tissue cut by a microtome.

Of course, it has crossed my mind that the immature frathouse boys are merely trolling us, that it is just more Beavis-and-Butthead “lulzing.”

Others think so:

Bernie

Posted March 11, 2019 at 9:45 am | Permalink

Gotta say, I was bewildered and disappointed by all the dissident right support for Yang. After all, the guy is a fairly standard leftist and anti-white on all the racial issues. But now I see it is (mostly) a joke/meme and have learned to laugh at it (a bit).

Then again, maybe not.  Remarkable.  Guess what, Richie, back in 2016, Trump was “worthy of support” because he was going to build dat dere wall, and he was possibly going to crack down on “legal” immigration as well.  Wha’ happen?

Either way, it is bad.  These guys are either demented as regards judgment or they are imbecilic immature idiots.

Should salaries be winsorized?

I am reading Crime and Punishment, and it is amusing that there is a male Russian radical character stating the belief that woman are equal to men in every way, including physical strength.  The more things change, the more they stay the same.

This here does not in any way change the genetic interests of the English people; EGI is forward looking and how current genepools came into existence is not the issue.

Why I despise White people, particularly White males (not men).  Yes, international sales contributed, but the bottom line is that if Whites, particularly males, boycotted it, it would tank.  These are the people who are going to bring us Total White Victory (+/- 50 years)?

Whites are a hopeless omega race – lower than omega, the leucosa race.

But if they hate Whites (and they do) – that’s A-OK!  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

Trouble in Colored Paradise.  It’ll all be good when Whitey is not around to kick around any more, right?

Eggroll?  Sounds familiar.  As for the meme itself, well…

Roissy: What’s the common thread?  Gee, I don’t know Beavis…maybe, cuck naggers?

How’s that “last chance for White America” thing coming along?  If the Quota Queens had any character whatsoever, they’d leave racial activism and go retire to some place they’d be comfortable (Israel or China are two prime destinations).

Behold the wopess – this couldn’t happen to a more deserving person. The Left devours its own.  I also enjoy Warren making noises about “breaking up” the Big Tech SJWs. Excellent.

Look at this nonsense, while remembering this written previously.  And this. Two points from the main piece.  First, this fellow claims to be middle-aged.  I always imagined him to be a Millennial, given he writes like a callow youth.  Second, note the part about gays, particularly that “committed” homosexuals should find an opposite sex gay person to reproduce with.

You see, gay apologists like to stress that “it’s biological.”  OK.  So, if it is biological, then by reproducing, they’ll be passing it on. Does a “White Ethnostate” need more homosexuals?  Also, if a man is a “committed” non-bisexual homosexual, meaning he is only sexually attracted to men, how is he going to “get it up” with a woman, much less a lesbian?  So, is it really “only biological” in that case?  And if this is the case of a man who can “perform with anything” in a Negro-like fashion, is that what we want reproducing?

I suppose this can be with artificial insemination – “turkey baster babies.” That’s great!  What a wonderful family unit!  Dad jacks off to gay porn and Mom has that semen placed into her fetid yeastbucket.  What tales they can tell “junior” about his (or her) conception!  Traditionalism!  Is that what a “White Ethnostate” should be about?  

Lots of deep thinkers among the current crop of Counter-Currents writers, of that we can have no doubt.  

His riposte would no doubt be: “I have personally seen it happen more than once.”  Interesting people this individual associates with.  His anecdotal claim then brings us back to the same questions and comments made above.

Then there’s the comments:

Madison Grant never had kids. Adolf Hitler never had kids. Were they losers? Were they failures?

Do I really need to answer that?

…the Movement is made up of and attracts men who are weirdos and spergs…

True.

…saying to young WN men that we should get married and have kids is advice that’s dead on arrival. And to be clear, I’m not saying that nerds and spergs should be catered to or coddled (truth be told, we should submit to voluntarily sterilization after we create the White Ethnostate.

And he just proves his own self-characterization.  Gee…yes, let’s sterilize all the intellectual introverts, so the whole population will be strutting around like Vince McMahon and sniggering like Beavis and Butthead within two generations. The Alt Right/Game Idiocratic Ethnostate!  I support eugenics, but one has to be careful, since traits are linked.  It would seem to be a good thing to select against manic-depression, neuroticism, anxiety, introversion, etc. – until you end up with an uncreative, laid-back nation of Negrified psychopaths.  Selecting solely for intelligence may leave you with a nation of autistic soyboys. At least promote the breeding of well-rounded and accomplished individuals by suppressing the lowest dregs, without being too narrow in your criteria.

Might as well get it out of the way early on: I’m a young white man with an Asian wife.

American Renaissance awaits!  VDARE embraces you!  What’s the problem? Hail Derbyshire!

Question: Then why doesn’t this person support the Sallis groupuscule, which has been telling the truth about Trump for more than three years?  Do I really need to link to that affirmative action YouTube song video again? Let’s just pretend I did.

Roissy continues to be insanely deluded:

Trump, do something useful this week for your base. Direct your AG to declare the SPLC a hate group which should be monitored nonstop by the FBI.

What is far more likely is that Trump will write a big fat (like him) “D’Nations” check to the SPLC, while tweeting about how the Democrats are so terribly “anti-Semitic.” 

Weasel-faced Roissy still doesn’t get it.  Hey, Roissy – your “God Emperor” (by his actions and inaction, forget the bombastic blustering) supports the SPLC.  He supports Antifa. He betrays his base on a now-almost-daily basis.  Can you give up your sweaty homoerotic fervor for this obese clown?

And now it is all because “Bannon left and was replaced by ‘Javanka.”  Newsflash to the Trumptards: If your obese “God Emperor” was actually a serious right-wing populist and not a blustering buffoon, then Bannon would still be there, wouldn’t he?  Isn’t Trump the masterful alpha male billionaire “Art of the Deal” (ghostwritten) hero leading us into glory?  Is he going to be manipulated by his praying mantis-headed daughter and her skinny Jew husband?  What gives?

Exit Stage Left

More Der Movement.

Trump and the DOJ have all the legal justification they need to act against Antifa. Instead of doing so, they legally persecute the victims of Antifa.

Trump, by his action and inaction, reveals himself to be a de facto radical leftist.

When he is removed from office, either by election or by a successful impeachment trial (or by resignation after impeachment), he will “exit stage left.”

In general, this was a good podcast, but there were a few low points.

Taylor – a self-declared “free market capitalist.”  That’s a dividing line made very clear, isn’t it?  I have stated over the years that I have nothing against the free market in principle, but I do not fetishize it. Tucker Carlson made cogent criticisms of unrestrained predatory capitalism, and I would like to see Taylor comment on Carlson’s economic views.

Kersey – who obviously doesn’t know the difference between an “oxymoron” and a “redundant statement.”

Gavin Newsom – with his “Nordic children.” And – he’s not “light in the loafers.”  Is that – gasp! – a homophobic statement?  I can imagine that the “Mannerbund” faction of Der Movement is not going to like that at all.  Der Movement always likes to talk about the impeding fracturing of the “coalition of the fringes.”  Yes, but the same can be said about Der Movement itself. We all know about the feuds, but it goes deeper than that.

Apparently, there are people in the “movement” who really don’t like homosexuality; others in the “movement” are themselves homosexual.  We have some people in the “movement” who consider Richard Spencer the worst person in human history; others in the “movement” happily associate with Spencer and host him on their podcasts. And those are just two examples of the barely concealed fissures and inconsistencies among people who, on the surface, seem to be part of a broad coalition, but are likely just one argument away from descending into Spencer-Johnson levels of animus. There’s an unstable coalition of the fringes on the Right as well as on the Left.

And, again, this is not “Sallis being a troublemaker” or “Sallis is crazy and bitter.”  This is an issue of ethics and morality, an issue of consistency.  If Joe publicly labels John as an immoral destructive influence, and really believes that, then how can Joe cheerfully collaborate with friends and allies of John?  If Tim believes that “X, Y, Z” is harmful, how can Tim be taken seriously if Tim hobnobs with supporters, promoters, and practitioners of X, Y, Z?  If someone sacrifices moral integrity for political convenience, they then forfeit any right to pose as a “leader.”

And, as Tom Hagen says in The Godfather, it is business, not personal.  I have nothing personally against any of these people, if they do good I praise them, if they reformed I would support them, and if they were in trouble I would help them.  But if you want to be a leader, you have to actually be a leader, not an affirmative action empty suit.  There has to be accountability. Someone has to be out there, a third party observer not involved in “movement” politics and petty feuding over money and status, who can honestly criticize. I know these guys don’t think of it that way, and they do take it personally, but that just demonstrates their weakness.  Instead of fuming over their honest critics, they should thank them.  That they do not realize this demonstrates the validity of my criticism.

Cochran:

It’s that time again, time to contribute. 

The tin cup is rattling.

You can send funds via Paypal, or by check. If you want deductibility, or have something complicated in mind, write to me at gcochran9@comcast.net.  

Did all of the Unz money dry up?

I’ll be reviewing books, talking about this and that, abusing reporters, and working on a weird startup (details to follow).  

Is the start-up organizing the Israeli army to conquer Italy?

Consulting work on algorithm development, GPU programming, miscellaneous software, and estimating your date’s breeding value is welcome.

As long as the date is East Asian, you’re all set.

Why does the Right always have to be an embarrassment?  These guys are not going to attract White STEM activists, and that is a shame, and will in the long run be a costly deficit.

Now, I still support this fellow and his lawsuit, but the optics of all these people are terrible, absolutely terrible.  The only prominent person in Der Movement who, in my opinion, has decent optics is Jared Taylor.  All the others should try to emulate him, re: optics.  Although, true, there also is a place for “firebrand” types – albeit those who are serious, not lulzing jackasses.

Speaking of the lawsuit, while I support it and hope Allen wins, I’m not as optimistic of his chances as are others.  I mean – if you really believe the System is dedicated to White genocide, how can you so blithely assume that facts, logic, and an airtight case actually mean anything?

Now, cases like this should still be done.  The enemy should be confronted, and there is always a chance of getting a relatively honest judge and jury.  Stranger things have happened.  Who knows?  Maybe there will be an out-of-court settlement.  Anything is possible.  Just be prepared for the possibility of a completely outrageous politically-motivated misreading of the actual legal issues at stake here.

A Counter-Currents commentator confirms my skepticism:

The peculiarity of our situation is that our enemy is not Jews and POCs but our fellow-Whites: it is them who vote the establishment into office….

That’s why Johnson and McCulloch are delusional, arguing over when victory will occur.  Better to argue over if.

Counter-Currents writer:

All of John’s criticisms are valid. My knowledge of America is very much derived from books and pop culture.

Then why are you writing essays about an America you know absolutely nothing about?

December’s Marching Movement

In der news.

As if you need more evidence that Derbyshire’s genetic line is inextricably linked to that of China, and will likely become more linked over time, and if you need more evidence of who really wears the pants in the Derbyshire household. I realize the following argument is ad hominem, but still…why would you believe anything this fellow says about “HBD race realism?”

A spokeswoman for the California system, Dianne Klein, said on Wednesday that the university system did not consider race in its admissions process. “Neither race, ethnicity nor gender factor into U.C.’s holistic admissions policy,” she said.

The university is full of it: Believe me, “holistic admissions policy” is ALL about “race and gender.”  It’s just a fundamentally dishonest way of getting around laws on open quotas.

Barletta is a greasy cuck.  Looks a bit like Greg Conte, I think.

Gamester:

Captain Obvious

I’m with Anglin on this – I’m starting to wonder whether the average woman even has a soul.

My comment on that no doubt would be different from Greg Johnson’s.

The Truth About Trump…and from Roissy’s own site, no less.  Ouch.  Emphasis added:

Ironsides

How can this purported blowback make anything WORSE?

Freedom of assembly and freedom of speech were proven to be dead by Charlottesville.

The Deep State is still rampaging over the supine form of Heritage America, stamping its face into paste with hobnail boots.

The police EXE CUT ED a guy for refusing to hand over his guns because of a bullshit red flag law, giving us a preview of horrors to come.

Trump is still in crosshairs of impeachment from the Dems, or worse. Illegal immigration is now HIGHER than under the critter Obama, because the spics have figured out the threats were hollow. Deportations are measly. There is no Wall. There probably won’t be a Wall. The Deep State villains we all know remain at large, free, well paid, influential, powerful.

Antifa is still prancing around, and to make matters worse, people who fight back when attacked by them are arrested as terrorists for defending themselves.

We lost the House and the Dems made a concerted effort to steal the Senate. The demographic situation is catastrophic and getting worse by the day. Even if Trump somehow rallies the same support in 2020 as in 2016 after this litany of flops and disasters, he might lose anyway simply because of the endless flow of scab voters into the USA.

As soon as Trump is out of office, he and his family are probably going to be hounded to destruction by their enemies.

All of the alleged Trump victories are invisible ones.

What in the fuck does Trump have to lose by going balls to the wall and calling on the genuine American people to support him?

I repeat, what “blowback” could be worse than this goddamn death spiral the country is in?

At this point, all this fancy shmancy “4D chess” “he has to go slowly” stuff ix just making excuses for Trump, ignoring that unless he gets off his ass and RISKS something to win, he’s either a weakling, fool, and jester who doesn’t have the balls to do what everyone with half a brain knows he needs to do, or he’s a sellout. Or both.

Who dares, wins.

Trump hasn’t dared a fucking thing for two years.

This isn’t a garden party where our side can sit and adjust their bowties decorously . This is a fucking totalitarian communist jew dictatorship overwhelming America and turning it into an unspeakable shithole in real time. There’s no point in waiting, because the blowback from doing nothing for a VERY short additional time will be equal to or worse than the blowback from anything he could do to try to change the situation.

on December 1, 2018 at 7:42 pmIronsides

The situation of America and Trump is like being on fire, and not using a fire extinguisher in your hand because you’re worried about the blowback from the flames if you make them angry by putting them out too fast.

It’s a recipe for ending up extra crispy with absolute certainty, rather than having at least a chance to escape only moderately burned.

You read it on this blog first, three years ago: Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a fraud, a Negrophilic cuck with Jewish family connections. His vaunted “extremism” is simply centrist common sense made “radical” because America has shifted so far to the left, and his only utility has been to stimulate chaos and balkanization because his bluster triggers SJW/Colored over-reaction.  The man himself is a big fat zero – emphasis on fat.

NECist-Fetishist alert: 

In my mind, Roosh is basically White, and talking about him in this manner makes as much sense to me as expressing horror at the dusky Sicilians “miscegenating” with Swedes.

Quite obviously, the first and the latter two pictured are racially identical, if not that the first pictured is more White.

Der Movement marches on!

Roissy really wrote this; this is not a joke:

I chuckle thinking about Melania and Don’s marriage. They are in love with each other, but there’s gotta be some friction that heats up the bedroom. For instance, Melania is dressed to kill in Paris, living the dream, trying to impress Frenchies, soaking up the adulation…then her husband tweets the next day about the French almost speaking German.
She’s exasperated, All her good will, politesse, and carefully chosen fashion statements for naught, because Don had to lay the smackdown on Maricon. Later that night, when they’re alone, she slaps him, maybe playfully, maybe not, a tear beginning to form. Don takes her in his arms….sympathizes, assures her he’ll be better next time…she straddles him.. “oh mr president….”

Does Catamite Roissy fantasize about his being in the place of Melania here?

The Omega Slap.

Is this the most delusional post ever written?  Trump is not going to do any of that  He’s not capable; he’s not interested.  If he’s not an overt far-left fraud and mole, then he’s the most low-energy, cognitively-challenged, weak and indifferent President we’ve ever had, making the likes of Milliard Fillmore into paragons of dynamic historical relevancy by comparison.  Until we get ANY signs of political fire in Trump, expect more of the same: blustering juvenile tweets, a complete lack of action, and lots of Big Macs consumed.

Names, please.

Very cognitive. Very elite.  The picture accompanying the article had me confused- the “woman” or the husband?  Then I remembered what racial group we are dealing with here, so the lack of sexual dimorphism made sense.

Der Movement Friday

In der news.

These DNA results put “one of the boys” in a new perspective, eh?  The quota queen mafia are intimately inter-related indeed.  And don’t worry Derb by your lack of “exoticness” (unlike Spencer and Johnson) – your offspring more than make up for you.

Speaking of the extended Derbyshire clan’s co-ethnics, we read the same old story: copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal. A people bereft of any spark of creativity whatsoever, a race of “human” photocopiers, utterly deficient of any originality, nothing.

Very cognitive.  Very elite.  More “k-selected” Northeast Asian behavior, eh?  Honorary Aryans, depigmented supermen from where the cold winds blow!  Hail Asia!  Hail HBD!  Hail cognitive elitism!

Trump…troops to the border.  So what?  If they won’t use force – including lethal force – to stop the invaders, it will end up being another defeat, another capitulation, another humiliation.  Don’t forget that in The Camp of the Saints, the French government did send out a ship to intercept (or at least investigate and gauge the sailor’s willingness to use force) the Brownster Armada, and, tried to feebly mobilize troops for the landing…all for naught.  No Whitey could be found to defend their nation. But, I’ll be fair.  Let’s see what happens.  Maybe Trump will stand firm and not one single “refugee” will enter the country.  I think it more likely they’ll be some sort of surrender and/or legal battle coupled with empty Twitter bluster (with Roissy cheering at all the wonderfully productive negs), but nothing at all accomplished to secure the nation and its borders.  How’s “the wall” coming these days?  How’s that “America First” foreign policy with no entanglements?  How’s the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server coming?  When will “the swamp” be drained? When is the crackdown on tech companies as public utilities?  When…oh you see the pattern by now.  But, hey, lots of tweets produced and lots of Big Macs consumed, so we’re all good!

Bit, if I’m wrong, I will admit it, as I always do the rare times I am wrong, unlike the quota queens, who refuse to acknowledge their constant stream of error.

Remember the Sallis Strategy is about destroying the GOP (with a few exceptions like King). The Sailer Strategy is for the GOP to dog whistle to get White votes (and do nothing for these voters after the election).  Sallis right, Sailer wrong – as per usual.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

What are the odds that Spencer is still in the “movement” five years from now?  Or, that’ll he last as long in it as I’ve had (and that despite the fact that Der Movement is openly and enthusiastically congenial to him ethnically, showering him with leadership opportunities, a situation diametrically opposite of that experienced by others)?  Someone can say that a person’s private relationships are no one else’s business as long as they do their “activist job” (no comment about how well they do that job), but that’s hypocrisy as well, since the private lives of other “movement” leaders are put under the microscope, including people engaged in a long-standing feud with Spencer. It is curious how Der Movement cherry picks what to get all exercised about and what not.  Just like the alleged homosexuality of “person A” is a big deal, while the long-standing rumors that “person B” is also a homosexual are completely ignored (albeit true enough that A creates the issue with their apologia while B does not).  Then we have folks waxing enthusiastic over Derbyshire, despite the, shall we say, “chink in the armor” of his own “movement” persona.  It’s all “Who? Whom?” as Breezy Steve would say.

Personally, while I have nothing against Spencer personally, it is hard to trust, or take seriously, a Far Right leader engaged in a long-term relationship with a liberal.

Der Movement Dishonesty

Analysis.

Surprise: Pro-homosexual apologia in this discussion.  Who would have ever guessed?  Starting at 1:27:30.

Logical flaw: Just because negative attitudes about homosexuality derived from Judeo-Christianity doesn’t mean that those attitudes are wrong. That’s a fallacy, sort of like ad hominem; instead, everything needs to be judged on its own merits.  One has to evaluate homosexuality based on its effects on society, independent of what people thousands of years ago said or did.

The DNA ancestry result mentioned (1% North African for Greg Johnson): tells you something about the validity of low percentage “admixture.”  Anything less than 10% should be viewed with skepticism, less than 5% with extreme skepticism, and anything less than around 1% is ludicrous. If we assume that Johnson’s ancestry is (more or less) fully of founding stock ancestry, then where does this 1% come from?  It could reflect some sort of ancient influx (“just so” stories of North African soldiers of the Roman Empire stationed in Britain), OR it could be some sort of artifact. I believe that the latter is more likely than the former; however, this applies not only to the Johnsons of the world but to everyone else.  The DNA testing companies err on the side of false positives, Type I errors, which makes the tests more attractive to the naïve looking for the “Indian Princess” in their background, or others attracted to “unexpected and controversial results.”  And, of course, there are political motivations as well. But Johnson’s results could be real.  However, if they are real, explanations better than popular “just so” stories are required. In the end, it really doesn’t matter; absolute racial purity is a myth.

Johnson’s initial dismissal of the Hermansson infiltration as essentially a “joke” that did no real damage is dishonest. He keeps on harping on the fact that “no real damage was done” – disregarding my comments again and again that the problem is NOT what the outcome was, but what is says about “movement” “leadership’s” piss-poor judgment and its obsessive ethnic fetishism.  Johnson then basically admits after 1:39 that the essential problem was the fact of the infiltration itself rather than the outcome, so why try to dismiss it to begin with? Excuse: Johnson trusted Steadman and his “extreme vetting.”  Why would you trust a guy wearing shorts at meetings, who blows on Viking horns, and who is an obsessive Scando-fetishist?  This is an issue of judgment.

Greg Johnson: Thin-skinned?  No, more like papyrus-skinned.  The latest from his blog:

By the way, this will be your last comment here. I do not provide a platform for people to spit in my face by accusing me of bad faith.

Obsessive attacks against Richard Spencer are, on the other hand, of course welcomed.  Note conversation starting at 19:30 in the Luke Ford podcast.  Spencer, Spencer, it is always about Spencer. Note how Johnson says “everyone” used the term “Alt Right” and jumped on the bandwagon – no, Greg, Strom was skeptical and I was always hostile to the Alt Right.  Thus, once again, a completely dishonest narrative.

More dishonesty: Johnson keeps on talking about how the Alt Right was ruined by people wanting to “control the movement” while ignoring the more fundamental problem of the Alt Right wanting to control the entire racial activist “movement.”

Greg blames the drinking and street fighting on WN 1.0, while the TRUTH is that the WN 1.0 denounced all of that, while the Pepe-Kek cosplay WN 2.0 crowd was solidly behind it.  The entire Alt Right “realm of ideas” was Pepe, Kek, Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, drinking, juvenile jackassery – and while Alt Right apologists were praising the “youth culture,” “old school” WN 1.0 folks were denouncing all of that.  And here comes Johnson, blaming the faults of WN 2.0 on the WN 1.0 that was actually denouncing it.  Outrageous dishonesty.  And who was saying “the Alt Right is White nationalism or nothing at all?’’  Amazing.  “Bad faith?”

And, hey, Greg, you’re not going to get a “mass movement” based on Pepe and Savitri Devi.

By the way: “Dr. Johnson” – he earned it!  How about Dr. Sallis?   Get over yourself already. 

If Johnson believes that talk of “false flags” is mostly stupid – and I agree – then is he going to denounce Roissy’s promotion of the false flag narrative?

And by the way, Greg, Tara and Lauren are far from being “Joan of Arc.”  To even imagine such a comparison is ludicrous.  Greg:

This movement is full of disgusting people.

Indeed.

However, with all of that, I do essentially agree with this analysis.  Although I assume Greg will blame that on “WN 1.0,”  even though it can be traced back to both the 2.0 folks and their “boomer” enablers.

Meet the ethnically disinterested Dienekes Pontikos.  No ethnic agenda there!