Category: immigration

Justice for Michael Douglas

Not the actor.

In response to this, I say: hey, Laura, given the dark stain in your past, why don’t you just shut your filthy mouth?  Instead of making excuses for the young man you killed, why don’t you come clean, after all these years, about it?  Were you driving drunk? Why no sobriety test?  Did you harbor a grudge against the victim?  Was it all really an accident?  Inquiring minds want to know.

Laura Bush is an enigma wrapped in another enigma. She is shy, beautiful, bookish, and in 1963, she blew through a stop sign and killed a guy. It was probably an accident. Perhaps it was simply youthful recklessness. Or maybe, just maybe… it was murder. Join Mrs. Bush for this intimate evening of reminiscences: of her childhood in Texas, of her marriage to George W. Bush, and of their rapid ascent to the very pinnacle of world power. Don’t miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get up close and personal with the woman behind the Decider.

You know, there is no statute of limitations on murder.  Nothing stops authorities from reopening the Michael Douglas case to see if there is any evidence to put before a grand jury.  It can be done right now.  It should be done right now.  Why not?  If there is nothing wrong there, if there is nothing to hide, why not reopen the case and put all questions to rest?  Speaking of rest: Can Michael Douglas finally rest in peace?

Justice for Michael Douglas!

Advertisements

Internal Refugees?

The next liberal cause celebre?

The more rational of White leftist “progressives” should be wary of their enthusiastic defense of the “international law” assertion of the (virtually unlimited) rights of refugees to migrate and the equally expansive obligations of (White) nations to host them.

How about applying the same standards to internal refugees, officially called “internally displaced persons?”

Such people are not currently “legally” considered refugees, but, like anything else, properly applied SJW hysteria, Jewish activism, pressure groups, media campaigns, etc. – the whole System acting in concert – can change that.  

Imagine if “internally displaced persons” are given all the rights of international refugees.  Why, perhaps, White liberals in their gated communities and in their leafy blue state suburbs will be legally obligated to take in some ghetto Negro refugees from the inner city, Negro migrants fleeing the “urban warfare” of, say, Detroit and Chicago.  Open your doors wide!

Even more painful for the liberals would be if White bigots fleeing urban colored violence would be considered refugees, and the homes of White liberals had to be opened to take in the great unwashed of bad-White racists.  Not to worry, though, no chance of that scenario, just like, for example, White South Africans are mysteriously not accorded the same rights, and welcomed as refugees, as are Middle Easterners or Africans.

But the first scenario?  Forced racial integration and abrogation of White property rights, and the even more pernicious abrogation of private freedom of association (public being lost long ago), under the guise of “refugee rights?”  Not only possible, but increasingly likely, given continued and unabated SJW hysteria, Colored Privilege, and White cowardice.

You read it here first!

This is the lesson of the schoolyard: If someone is bullied and refuse to stand up for themselves and refuse to fight back, then they WILL be bullied continuously, without end.  However, if they do stand up for themselves and do fight back, get their licks in, do some damage to their opponent, then, even if they lose, it is unlikely that they will be bullied again.  Bullies tend to be cowards and look for easy prey, they look for those will won’t fight back. In other words, cowardly bullies target cowardly victims.

Whites as a race are akin to a cowardly bullied pansy who doesn’t fight back, won’t stand up for himself, and is therefore marked as easy pickings.  Whites being bullied to now accept feral coloreds as obligatory internal refugees would be just another example of White uselessness and cowardice.

But, perhaps, just perhaps, the Trump election was just the tip of the iceberg, and at some point, especially after being disappointed and betrayed by the globohomo milksop cuck Trump, there will be a growing White backlash that will make Trumpism seem like a mild political hiccup.

Who knows?  

Only time will tell.

More King Cuck

Roissy weeps.

The Trumpian fraud, emphasis added:

President Donald Trump may have announced that “DACA is dead” over the weekend, but statistics released Monday by the Justice Department appear to suggest otherwise.

Since the start of January this year, the Trump administration has approved tens of thousands of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) applications and renewals, a quarterly report from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has revealed. (The report was filed in court by the Justice Department in an ongoing legal fight with California).

More than 55,000 initial and renewal applications were approved by the Trump administration in the past three months alone…

 

Pathetic homoerotic Trump fanboy Roissy (cuck nagger) weeps bitter tears.

The Alt Right crowd doubts Trump has what it takes.  Some of us know that before he was elected.

The Alt Wrong’s Final Exam

What is their priority?


UPDATE: Israel is now saying it is suspending the agreement, not because of the damage that would be done to the West, but because of internal “right-wing” pressure about allowing half the Africans to remain in Israel.  I will still run the post I have written, because it is relevant given the underlying Israeli/Jewish attitudes.  For example, get this:

Netanyahu named Germany, Italy and Canada as examples of countries that would accept the migrants, though German and Italian officials said they had no knowledge of any such agreement.

Original post:

Readers may be familiar with this news story.

The Far Right has long accused Jews of hypocrisy: while the Tribe pushes for diversity and alien immigration into Western nations, nations, nations thus headed for minority status for the current White majority, Israel is a Jewish national state, with a resistance to the same mass migration of aliens that Jews foist on Whites throughout the globe

Israel’s determination to deport African migrants back to Africa, where they belong, fits into this paradigm.  However, under pressure from the “United Nations” (United Coloreds would be more accurate). Israel’s “right-wing” government has blinked.  However, they are not keeping all their poor, persecuted Africans.  No, sir, only half.  The other half will be dumped on “Western nations” – I’ve read that Canada, Germany, and Italy are possible destinations.

This is quite remarkable.  If Israel does not have the moral courage to take the steps to safeguard their demographic stability, then that is THEIR problem, and one richly deserved given the predominant role Jews have played in undermining Western demographics.  But, no, even in their hour of defeat the Jews strike out at their eternal enemies, the European peoples, using Black Africans as a biological weapon to undermine the racial and cultural basis of the West, while relieving themselves of half their problem.

Could the opposite be done?  Maybe the USA can send half of its “Dreamers” to Israel?  Turnabout is fair play.  But, no, things don’t quite work out that way, do they?

Now, I will give Amren credit for no longer censoring the comments threads of any criticism of Jews, so some commentators there are venting their well-justified rage over this outrage.  But what about those who run that site?  What about its stable of writers, including “Gregory Hood,” heretofore never afraid to express his opinions on controversial matters?

I would think if some other nation would have connived to dump over 16,000 African migrants into Western nations, the Alt Wrongers would be screaming about it for days.  Will they do so about Israel, and do so in a manner that properly expresses the outrage of the whole situation, put into the context of endless Jewish promotion of Western multiracialism and multiculturalism?  Commentaries?  Podcasts?  A statement of principles?  An acknowledgement that this is an act of demographic warfare, consistent with all that has gone before?  Will they finally speak up on this issue?  To clearly demonstrate that their priority is for Europeans and not Jews, for the West and not for Israel?  Will they do this?

Think of it as a final exam.  Not final as in FINAL, but akin to a final exam in a particular class.  There will be other final exams, on other issues, but, today, the question of Jewish hypocrisy on race presents to the Alt Wrong a final exam on that specific issue.

Stay tuned.

Alt Right News, 2/2/18

Groundhog Day edition.

An Alt Right activist prepares to enjoy the holiday.  It’s of Germanic origin after all.  Heil Phil!

Someone else gets it, albeit a bit late.

The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that any other outcome than Nightmarer deportation is a failure. Der Touchback can win any sort of concessions but fat (as Roissy would say, heh) chance any of them becoming actualized long term.  Remember, amnesty is forever, enforcement is never.

And the political cost of deportation?  The media and the Left will make a huge cry and show “opinion polls” saying it is unpopular (like the same type of polls I stupidly believed in the fall of 2016 predicting a Clinton electoral victory), but so what?  These types will hate Trump no matter what he does (or does not do); remember the EGI Notes mantra: For the Left, hatred of Trump is a polite and socially acceptable way to express hatred of Whites.

With DACA deportation, the Left will hate Trump and the Democrats and Cuckservatives will oppose him. With DACA amnesty, the Left will still hate Trump and the Democrats and Cuckservatives will still oppose him.  Amnesty won’t win him or the GOP any votes from the Left; however, amnesty will cost both Trump and the GOP votes from the Right.

But, hey, the Alt Right Brainmasters (the leadership, not the rank-and-file who have healthier ideas, as the above-linked article shows us) tell us that supporting deportation is “stupid” and “short-sighted.”  Yes, indeed, let us be smart and politically pragmatic like Reagan was in 1986.  Worked real well for him.  And for us.

Meanwhile, Ann Coulter’s breakfast butler hysterically proclaims: “All Hail the God-Emperor’s State of the Universe Address!” Counter-Currents: How have the mighty fallen.

Like the movie Groundhog Day, history will repeat itself in an endless loop until Der Movement gets it right: Stop with the puerile Man on White Horse Syndrome worship.

Immigration: No Free Lunch

It’s NOT the economy, stupid.

I note, and have noted many times before, that the immigration question among the mainstream is continuously presented (almost solely) in economic terms.  The latest manifestation of this is the claim that immigration is the “closest thing to a free lunch” since population growth fuels economic growth via an increased number of workers and consumers. This Ponzi scheme view of economic growth fails for a number of reasons, including the obvious point that a larger economy divided over a larger population is not increasing the per capita payoff – it may be a larger pie, but not larger pieces for each individual. I note that as immigration has flooded into America over the past several decades, allegedly “fueling economic growth,” real wages for the typical American have stagnated, and the American middle class is in a well-documented and oft-discussed decline.  Is it that all this “growth” is lining the pockets of big business, and also benefiting the immigrants themselves and not natives?  Then we are constantly being told that automation will “make work obsolete,” and so a “basic guaranteed income” will be required in the wake of the mass unemployment thus created – a “citizen’s dividend” based on the productivity generated by automation and artificial intelligence.  If so, why do we import more people who will not only become superfluous as workers, but who will compete with natives for the proceeds of the productivity to be distributed as that guaranteed income?  

And even putting the issue of automation aside, the Ponzi scheme aspect of the immigration-population-economy equation becomes more clear when we ask: if immigrants do the work natives won’t do, then who will do that work in the next generation (assuming no automation) when the immigrants’ children are “Americans” or “Europeans” with American or European expectations and the consequent disdain for manual labor?  Do we import another generation of immigrants to do this unwanted work, repeated ad infinitum, until the entire nation is full of the posterity of those brought in to do cheap manual labor?  Conversely, if we need “high skilled immigrants” as we in America are constantly told, then why can’t we find Americans to do these desirable, highly-paid professional jobs?  Are native Americans stupid as well as lazy?  And, if so, how did they build a nation so attractive that all these immigrants want to come to in the first place?  And, further, if immigrants are required to fund “the retirement of an aging native population” (assuming that young non-Whites would politically support funding the retirement of old Whites who they hate), what happens when the immigrants themselves get old and retire?  Would more immigrants be required to fund those retirements – an endless pyramid scheme of immigration and inter-generational wealth transfer?  Or will the immigrants have enough children to support their retirement, underscoring the race replacement aspect of the immigrant influx?  Speaking of which, we can further ask – even if a declining native population “hinders economic growth” (a popular meme, along with the “who will pay for retirement” ploy, to justify genocidal alien immigration into Europe) – so what?   Eventually it will be a self-correcting process, as automation, increased productive efficiency, altered economic structures and expectations and, very likely, an eventual increase in the native birth rate, balances things out – sans replacement immigration.  I can also point out that bringing in hordes of cheap labor aliens to crowd out, compete with, and displace, natives is not exactly conductive to increasing native birth rates.  Or is that the intention?

Finally, we get to the most important, the most fundamental point.  Even if everything the pro-immigration crowd says about economic benefit is true, it still is not worth it.  A nation is not an abstract economic zone, and a people are not an atomized mass of workers and consumers.  Nations and peoples are historical entities, with particular ethnic, racial, social, and cultural profiles, and a people being demographically and culturally displaced and replaced are not benefiting, even if “the economy grows.” Mass immigration of alien peoples, particularly in the context of declining native populations, is genocide against the natives, and what price economic growth if historical nations and peoples cease to exist, and vanish from the Earth?  Read this post for a more technical analysis of the precedence of genetic continuity and genetic interests over any economic concerns, and if you still insist on putting a “dollars and cents” measure on these issues, then read this.  Existence, not economic growth, is the fundamental concern of any people, and no amount of “economic growth” – most of which the native masses will never themselves enjoy – can never justify criminal genocidal policies targeted against beleaguered European-derived peoples.


This post is also relevant to another pro-immigration argument I’ve seen making the rounds again recently: “if you are against (legal and illegal) low-skilled immigration, then you have no good reason to oppose high-skilled immigration, which is such a net positive for our nation.”  Nonsense.  Read this post again, particularly the last section that emphasizes race and culture, and the genocidal implications of displacing and replacing the native population.  Read the linked posts, especially the one outlining the EGI concept and its importance to immigration.  Of course high-skilled immigration is harmful; indeed, one can make the argument that high-skilled non-White immigration is worse for Whites than low-skilled non-White immigration.  High-skilled immigration brings in more clever and capable enemies, more capable and clever competitors, the importation of an alien ruling class, using ethnic nepotism to displace native White Americans from positions of power and prestige.  High-skilled immigrants, free-riding on the society and infrastructure painstakingly built up by White Americans, will climb to the top of the human energy pyramid, leveraging ethnic cartel networks to squeeze Whites out and reduce White Americans to a subaltern caste within their own nation. Is that a good enough reason for you?  Is that sufficient reason to oppose high-skilled immigration?  They are not us, they are not wanted, we need to develop and nurture our own high-skilled population.  We do not want or need leering aliens lording it over us.

Deport the Nightmarers

Out with the trash.

Listen to this.

So, the Alt Righters believe that taking an extreme hard-line position on DACA and immigration is stupid and short-sighted; they assert that we need to be practical and understand the realities of political horse-trading to make progress to ease the demographic pressures from immigration.

I have four ripostes to that position:

1. First, whether or not that opinion position is valid or not, it would seem to be valid only for those people in political power who actually have the option to engage in such pragmatic political negotiations.   Miller in the White House may well need to consider such a course of action.  However, perhaps it would be best for Alt Righters talking and lulzing in their “Hate Loft” to take the most extreme positions possible, to push the discussion as far in the radical direction as possible.  Leave the mainstreaming to those who have the power to actualize political deals, and manifest vanguardism to keep the mainstreamers honest.

2. The only deal worth making in exchange for DACA amnesty is one that truly eliminates all future illegal immigration and makes enormous cuts to legal immigration.  A true end to the illegal influx and a mass decrease to the legalized dispossession of White Americans.  Does anyone believe that’s what we will really get?

3. Why can’t we get enforcement of existing law – perhaps coupled to the decreased legal immigration that a majority of Americans want – without giving amnesty to the Nightmarers?  Why must following existing law be held hostage to amnesty?  Why must listening to the will of the American people be held hostage to amnesty?

4. There is a more fundamental reason why amnesty is a bad idea, even with lots of concessions in return: trading something irreversible for something reversible is always wrong, always a bad deal

Amnesty for the Nightmarers will indeed be irreversible (absent revolution and the ethnostate), and giving them eventual citizenship would just solidify that irreversibility.  However, “strict enforcement” can always be reversed by a future administration, by a shift in Congress, by judges striking down laws, by cuts in funding, by passive aggressive refusal to enforce existing law (as we have today). Enforcement can be ignored, but amnesty is forever.  Don’t we remember the fiasco of the Reagan amnesty?  How soon we forget.  What about the “wall?” Isn’t that permanent?  First, that assumes it will ever get built.  Second, even if it is built, its utility is limited, people can get in other ways, without strict, ongoing internal enforcement of immigration law, the grant wall is mostly symbolic rather than effective.  Third, legal immigration quotas can always be increased in the future, putting those “big beautiful doors” in the almighty wall.  The wall itself, even if built, doesn’t amount to much compared to the will to actually enforce the law – with that will, the wall wouldn’t be necessary to begin with.  The wall, in the end, built or not, may end up being another Trumpian scam.  Why doesn’t the Trump team and all his fanboys realize #4?  Readers of this blog know the answer to that.

The Nightmarers should be deported.  That’s actually the humane option, as one could argue that the Nightmarers should be treated like part of an invading army; the military should be sent after them.  If the Nightmarers surrender, put them into POW camps until the immigration war is won, and then repatriate them to their nations of origin.  If they resist, treat them as you would any resisting military enemy – destroy the opposing force.  Have the army gun them down.

One could argue that.  This blog, steeped in humanist pacifism and the love for all peoples, obviously would not argue that, but some people may do so.