Category: inbred vs. outbred

Rotten Orange News: It’s Howdy Doody Time!

And other stupidities.

More leftist violence.  Mudshark Annie – who likely has more testosterone than Trump and Sessions combined – seems all worked up about it.

So, when is “America’s Senator” going to finally crack down on leftist violence?  When is he – and the “God Emperor” of course – going to declare Antifa a domestic terrorist organization?  What’s stopping them – besides being incompetent cucks?

It would be optimal if we could somehow combine the political views of Paleocon quota queen Sessions with the competence of liberal Negro technocrat Giuliani.  Alas, such does not exist, so we’ll have to make do with an Attorney General who looks like a ventriloquist’s dummy without the ventriloquist.

See this.

If Trump is innocent of the whole Russian fiasco to begin with – and based on information we have so far I believe he is – then he and his administration are the most politically inept group of clowns imaginable for letting things go so far.  Yes, yes…”the System is against him” – they were against him in the campaign but he still won.  No, this current fiasco happened because when the System starting tentatively pushing the “Russian hacker” meme after the election, the “God Emperor” and his group of bumbling retardates fumbled around instead of forthrightly dealing with it.  More important for Trump to tweet about Arnold’s “Celebrity Apprentice” TV ratings, don’t you know.

Meanwhile, an ever-so-superior German says that closed borders will lead to “inbreeding.”

But, but, but…I thought there was “more genetic variation within groups than between groups?”  Is that not right, oh System mandarins?  If so, then German genetic diversity would be boosted by endogamous “inbreeding” while diversity will be decreased by “outbreeding.”  No, wait?  Is this kraut actually suggesting – god forbid! – that there are actually real genetic differences between, Germans and Turks?  If so, letting Turks or other aliens into Germany is genocidal (literally) replacement of the German people.  You can’t have it both ways.

HBD in the News, 5/4/16

Two items.

Read abstract, emphasis added:

Modern humans arrived in Europe ~45,000 years ago, but little is known about their genetic composition before the start of farming ~8,500 years ago. Here we analyse genome-wide data from 51 Eurasians from ~45,000–7,000 years ago. Over this time, the proportion of Neanderthal DNA decreased from 3–6% to around 2%, consistent with natural selection against Neanderthal variants in modern humans. Whereas there is no evidence of the earliest modern humans in Europe contributing to the genetic composition of present-day Europeans, all individuals between ~37,000 and ~14,000 years ago descended from a single founder population which forms part of the ancestry of present-day Europeans. An ~35,000-year-old individual from northwest Europe represents an early branch of this founder population which was then displaced across a broad region, before reappearing in southwest Europe at the height of the last Ice Age ~19,000 years ago. During the major warming period after ~14,000 years ago, a genetic component related to present-day Near Easterners became widespread in Europe. These results document how population turnover and migration have been recurring themes of European prehistory.

No. no, a thousand times no!  And now, let’s cite some HBD Chick interviews…

Also, I wonder how the HBDers reconcile their inbred/outbred scheme with the greater genetic heterogeneity in Southern Europe. I assume the official, Der Movement-approved, explanation would invoke heavy admixture – that the greasers are a heterogeneous mix of 50% sub-Saharan African and 50% Arab, who subsequently spent the centuries marrying their cousins, hence combining heterogeneity with being inbred. But, still, one wonders.