Category: IQ

More Silk Road News, 3/30/17

More Asian perfidy.

Derbyshire of all people points out anti-White hate-filled Asiatic judges,.

Remember the EGI Notes paradigm: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.

Note: There are two problems with taking Asian IQ scores at face value. First, the issue of cheating – they cheat on everything else, all sorts of standardized tests, so one must be careful.  Second, and likely more important, is whether the test scores represent the broad population. The Chinese, for example, tend to report selected test scores – so the question remains: is the high, high, high Chinese IQ reflecting the entire population, including all those peasants in the rice fields, or does it predominantly reflect urban elites in Beijing, Shanghai, and other major urban areas?  The same applies to other East Asian nations as well.

Anyone remember Monolid magazine, that anti-White Asian hate fest?

100 megaton nuclear torpedo?  Aim it at the Asian threat, my Russian brothers, aim at the Yellow Peril.

Richard Nixon apparently took the “opening to China” idea a bit too literally. Was Tricky Dick the original Silk Roader?

Future border guards of the West pictured here.

The Silkers should be happy: New Zealand in the jaws of the dragon.  White lands being conquered by the Yellow Peril.

Blue Collar and Strom

Two items.

First, we have this retarded stupidity

One reads this frequently: the “solution” to outsourcing, automation, etc. is “education and training.” This fails for a number of reasons, particularly the following three:

1. Not everyone can be trained for professional or other advanced positions, the occasional success story (survivor bias) notwithstanding.  There’s a bell curve for intelligence, and, let us be honest, that curve for folks in manufacturing is shifted to the left compared to that for the professions.  A significant fraction of blue collar folks simply cannot be trained to be effective, competitive white collar workers.  That’s not to say they are bad people, it is just they do not have the mental firepower.  So, what?  We either write them off, give them a “citizen’s dividend” income, have them all on welfare, or we try to save their jobs to the extent possible or find work for them at an equivalent level.

2. Guess what – those professional white collar jobs are being outsourced as well, or people (IT, for example) find themselves replaced by immigrant Asian coolie “cognitive elitist” labor. So, will we “train and educate” Americans so that they can “train and educate” their Asian replacements?

3. Automation may affect white collar jobs as well.  That “citizen’s dividend” is looking better and better.

Second, while I agree with Strom’s criticisms of WN delusions about Touchback Trump, I do not buy his solution – the National Alliance, a “brand” whose time I think has passed.  In particular, the NA will continue to have problems, I believe, as long as they hold onto, and double down on, the legacy of Pierce. Problem is, lots of folks in Der Movement – never mind the “normies” – have serious problems with that legacy. The Alt Right considers Pierce to be the old-fashioned past, the Alt Wrong rejects Pierce’s anti-Semitism and his lack of love for Asian “cognitive elitists,” the New Right rejects Pierce’s “Old Right” genocidal extremism, the Pan-European faction and the White ethnics distrust Pierce because of his Nordicism and hypocrisy (and perhaps Nordicists distrust Pierce because he was hypocritical, rather than forthright, about his Nordicism).  If Strom is going to embrace the Pierce legacy, then this has to be addressed.  Yes, we  can ignore the Alt Wrong, but the other factions have some legitimate critiques.

Metroland on the NPI Alt-Right Press Conference

More evidence that the HBD faction must be eschewed.

Of interest, emphasis added:

Taylor of American Renaissance talked of the intrinsic whiteness, or European-ness of America as nation, and refuted the notion that defending the national heritage is “racist” or “white supremacist” (since East Asians, as he never tires of reminding us, seem to have higher average IQs).

“Never tires” is a bit of an understatement. “Breathlessly, with excitement” seems more accurate.  And what’s wrong with racism?

People who had never heard of the Alt Right before now suddenly knew what a Pepe meme was.

And some of us wish we didn’t know.

So the journalists who showed up for the NPI press conference on Friday –from the Washington Post, The Daily Beast, Mother Jones, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, inter alia — knew they were at a watershed moment in American politics. Hillary was foundering, Trump had evened out the polls and would likely be the next President. 

Likely? I mean, it’s possible, and the odds have improved recently, but…likely? At best, even money.

Regardless of the election outcome, the Alt Right was now something to be taken seriously: people like Spencer, Brimelow, and Taylor might well be determining public policy for years to come.

Dear god…no. I have nothing against Spencer, who represents the more healthy Alt-Right WN faction, but if you let the Alt-Wrong HBDers determine public policy, Asians and Jews will have the “whip hand” over Whites for perpetuity (is that a situation Derbyshire is familiar with in his own domestic arrangements?).

The JQ did come up eventually, as the press conference wound down. Each of the speakers was queried, directly and indirectly, on whether Jews could be white/European/American. And Taylor, Spencer, and Brimelow gave the classic answers we have come to expect.  

Basically — Taylor: Yes, if some identify as such and share the proper values. 

Sigh. The Alt-Right really needs to make some decisions here, and by “Alt-Right” I mean the WNs.

Spencer: No, because they regard themselves as different. 

That’s very reasonable.

Brimelow: My answer is somewhere in between.

What is it Pete? A quantum superposition between “yes” and “no?”

“I don’t think our support of Trump is about policy, at the end of the day — it’s about style,” Spencer said. “We live in a fragmented, decaying society. We live in a society of moral degeneracy. We’re going to fight our way out it, and sometimes that means using the tools at hand. It’s going to mean unleashing a little chaos.”

That sounds familiar. Where have I ever heard that before?

Fisking Derbyshire, 9/12/16

Derbyshire: outrageous hypocrite.

This is amazing. All emphasis added:


Professor Watson is a race realist. Nine years ago he was in the news for publicly saying that sub-Saharan Africans have a low average intelligence. He had previously said out loud that Ashkenazi Jews have a high average intelligence.


One wonders what gets Derbyshire more excited: low Negro IQ or high Jewish IQ? One also wonders how Watson was treated by the Jewish community whose intelligence he so slavishly praised. More to the point, how many Jews came to Derbyshire’s defense when National Review kicked him to the curb?

Fiddlesticks to hurt feelings. The world, said Wittgenstein, is everything that is the case. Note he did not say, “everything that does not hurt your feelings.”

Uh huh. Is that why Derbyshire essentially invited “racists” who object to his marriage to come to his home so he can punch them in the face? I quote Derbyshire: 

What after all, should one think of someone who insults a stranger`s wife and children from the safe remoteness of an email link?
(In regard to which, if any of these skulking cowards would like to repeat their insults to my face, it is easy enough to find a person`s street address nowadays. Come show up at my door: I`ll gladly receive you in the appropriate manner.)

Yeah, well, fiddlesticks to your hurt feelings – fiddlesticks, I say! – Derbyshire, you disgustingly vile hypocrite.

It’s true we don’t yet know the full genetic architecture of race differences in intelligence. As human-science blogger JayMan says, though: You don’t need to know the name and job title of every worker in the factory to know the factory produces widgets

Yeah, that’s the same Jayman who went on Roissy’s site to object to common sense observations there with the protest “where’s all the peer-reviewed studies,” who won’t accept actual studies on Italian IQ as opposed to Lynn’s “estimates,” and who uses absurd strawman arguments to delegitimize the idea that people genetically more similar have a greater interest in each other than those more distant (i.e., genetic interests).

Well, I’ve been hanging out with Alt-Right types for a while. I’ve known Jared Taylor for twenty years; Peter Brimelow for sixteen; Richard Spencer I think for eight or ten. All have been guests at my house, I am proud to say.

Thanks Derb for that piece of information. I won’t forget it. Say it ain’t so, Richie!

So what, in my opinion, makes the Alt-Right a distinct thing—not by any means a party, a faction, or a movement, but a collection of souls with something in common?
Here’s my answer:
We don’t like flagrant nonsense in the discussion of human affairs. We don’t like being lied to. We especially don’t like being lied to by credentialed academics like Jerry Coyne.

As per “flagrant nonsense” here is Derbyshire’s laughable (and personally self-interested) defense of European-Asian mongrelization, from the same Taylor debate link as above:

In the particular case of European-Asian matches, Jared and I both recently attended a lecture that included a genetic analysis of the Uighurs, a Central Asian people. They are very precisely half European, half Asian.
I have, as it happens, met more than the average number of Uighurs. They seem to me a fine sturdy people not notably lacking in intelligence or afflicted with any very noticeable personality defects. They are certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.
I say again: Pshaw!

By god, Derbyshire has personally met some Uighurs and they seem like fine folks without any “very noticeable personality defects!”  They are “robust enough” to give the Chinese government problems. Hey, Derb, one can meet Negroes without any “very noticeable personality defects” and they are certainly “sturdy” and “robust enough” to give the American government “a lot of trouble.” Let’s hope your daughter marries one, eh? Pshaw!
If you, dear reader, are tempted to laugh at the childish stupidity of Derbyshire’s ”argument” there, keep in mind that is what passes for typical HBD “analysis.” How is that different, for example, from any Breezy Steve post? Or from Lynn’s “estimates” that just so happen (it’s a coincidence, a coincidence I tell you!) to match his IQ-GDP correlations?

The lies are so flagrant, so outrageously obvious, you’d have to laugh at them—if not for the fact that laughing at them is close to being a criminal offense (*).

Since the entire HBD faction of the Alt-Right (aka the Alt-Wrong) is based on lies and distortions, on lies so flagrant you have to laugh at them, all these guys must really, really, really not like themselves.
That’s OK. Can anyone blame them for that?
*Or having an elderly outrageous hypocrite like child porn apologist John Derbyshire threaten a feeble punch because anyone dares send him emails critical of his family? Hey, Derbyshire, just as you say we are not obligated to approve of the Left’s opinions on race, nor are we obligated to approve of your views on miscegenation, or your participation in it. Nor, dear sir, are we obligated to approve of an English illegal immigrant (**) damaging our genetic interests (you know, what Jayman lies to say do not exist) by bringing a Chinatrix to our country.
**More hypocrisy: Derbyshire opposes illegal immigration and amnesty for illegals, even though he himself is an amnestied illegal. Well, he may say, race matters – he’s of the same ancestry as America’s founding stock, and most current illegals are Third Worlders. OK, great, but if race is important in that regard, then your Chinese wife’s East Asian race is also important, you two-faced weasel. You can’t have it both ways – appealing to White racial sentiments to justify your own amnesty while condemning those same sentiments as “crazy” and akin to “latrine flies” when they question “Rosie.” What an obvious disgusting low-down hypocritical piece of filth this Derbyshire is.

Make a Distinction

It’s time for the WN Alt-Right to stand up to the HBDers.

Consider this:

Taylor told the audience that his job wouldn’t be over until at a PTA meeting, a woman could rise to defend the fact that fewer African Americans were in AP classes because they had a lower IQ and “no one objects.”

From the HBD/Yellow supremacist perspective, that could be rewritten as:

…until at a PTA meeting, an East Asian woman could rise to defend the fact that relatively fewer European Americans were in AP classes because they had a lower IQ and “no one objects.”

IQ and behavior are of course important but they are not fundamental.  Let’s assume that Jews and East Asians really have higher IQs than European Whites, and are more “law abiding” as well.  So – what?  Does that mean we must let Jews and East Asians into White nations? Let them dominate in academia and the professions (and in “AP classes”)?  Let them influence the political system, the economy, and social mores to their benefit and to our detriment?

Sharing a dislike for Blacks (and a homoerotic ardor for the “God Emperor” Trump) is not sufficient grounds for an alliance between radically different views of what the “Alt-Right” is all about.  The WN faction of the Alt-Right absolutely needs to make a distinction between themselves and the HBD faction, a completely disjunctive distinction.  If they fail to see that, then all my jibes about “affirmative action” will have been proven correct.

On the Alt-Right Press Conference, 9/9/16

Comments.

The alt right claims to have no leader, no spokesman, no formal organization. 

Thank god for that!

Reporters were then told to meet outside the Old Ebbitt Grill, across the street from the White House, but were again sent to another location, a ballroom in the Willard.

That approach was wise. Frankly, I’m surprised.

“We cannot be a Trump cheerleading squad,” Spencer said about the movement’s future, ruminating on the possibilities that the movement may even have to serve as a chief critic of Trump if he is elected and proves to be disappointing.

But you have been the cheerleading squad. Even worse than that.

“Certainly, we have been riding his coattails,” Spencer said of Trump. “There has been more interest in us because we have generally been pro-Trump.”

But then, a few lines down, we’re told that Trump is “almost irrelevant.”

Next up, the leaders agreed, was an aim toward professionalization and a hope that America was actually far more interested in segregation than it once admitted.

Segregation? Get dem dere Negras back to dere own water fountain! Problem solved! Dat right!

“Trump is in my view almost irrelevant,” Taylor said. “We are gaining ground because we are right.”

Er…so, the Trump issue has “almost” nothing to do with it? This press conference would have taken place without Trump? What about his “coattails?” The ONLY reason any ground has been gained – and I’m skeptical of even that – is solely due to Trump.

In order to move forward –with or without Trump– the alt right is beginning to see an opportunity to raise money, to start organizations, to put forward some of their own followers to run for city council or school board or political office.

Finally! Some sense! Practical approaches! Put away dem dere calipers and get out into the real world.

The overwhelming message was that the alt right is not going away even if Trump loses, or if Trump wins and begins to disappoint them. The message was that the alternative right is awakened and it’s ready not to back down even after its brief moment in the spotlight subsides.

It has already subsided.

Taylor told the audience that his job wouldn’t be over until at a PTA meeting, a woman could rise to defend the fact that fewer African Americans were in AP classes because they had a lower IQ and “no one objects.”

Er…is that it? That folks can talk about…(drum roll please)…IQ? Once again, the hardcore WN faction needs to separate from the HBD faction. You don’t have the same objectives, you know.

The alt right claims it is bigger than Trump. It’s “a struggle for the human soul,” Spencer said.

The soul? How about the genome? The civilization? And why mention Trump again? I thought he was “almost irrelevant?”
Although I’m critical, there’s some good here. The problem is to avoid having that good co-opted by the anti-WN, HBD “race realist” faction, with their Yellow Supremacist dogma. Having Whites exchange one set of masters for another would be a tragedy: to get rid of anti-White and pro-Black Jewish masters only to replace them with anti-White and anti-Black Jewish and East Asian masters (with a few brownster Desi cogelites thrown into the mix).
It’s time to copy Trump and “disavow, disavow, disavow.” Disavow the HBDers. The WN Alt-Righters need to go their own way, and leave those who jock sniff Asian IQ to their own devices.

Human Photocopier Alert

Speaking facts.


I’m glad to see someone else using the “copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal” mantra other than me.

East Asians: the human photocopiers, a race of robots, walking pocket calculators, without an ounce of creativity or Faustian impulse whatsoever. Oh, but they have a “high IQ” – “estimated” from all those “PISA tests” they routinely cheat on.

Now, all we need is for someone, besides myself, on the Right to take a principled and explicit stand against the HBD cult.