Category: James Bowery

Behold the Parasite

And other news.

Read or listen to this.  Excerpts, emphasis added:

…we of European descent are dealing with a power — the Jewish power structure — as our primary opponent in our struggle to survive. And they showed us that this power structure is more than just a band of unpleasant invaders from the Middle East; more than just a gang of clever swindlers; far more than just a peculiar and odious religion; more than just a cohesive ethnic group and competitor, but an entirely different kind of being, though in human form; a highly evolved, specialized literal biological parasite with all the danger and horror that that implies.

Both the vampire and the biological parasite keep the victim alive for quite some time as he or she is being bled and eaten upon. Both the vampire and the biological parasite can pervert or change the personality or soul of the victim — the vampire’s victims can become vampires themselves; some parasites alter the brain structure of their hosts and change their behavior, sometimes even making them suicidal; and Jews use mass media and other means (perhaps even some means of which we are not yet aware) to change the perceptions, views, and behavior of their hosts as well.

Gee…sounds a lot like the HBD cult. Hey, Strom, when are you FINALLY going to openly and forcefully call out the HBD cult and its manipulation – its perversion – of racialist instincts to promote Jewish (and Asian) interests?

The German Leader and martyr Adolf Hitler, who now stands as one of the great spiritual leaders of all human history…

Sigh…

Shickedanz anticipates modern studies of parasitic ants, quoting studies which said: “‘We nowadays know of a whole series of permanent social parasites among the ants.” He explains that normally, ants would eject alien species invading their colonies. But some parasitic ants are able to send chemical signals to change the thinking of their hosts, and make them welcome the invaders and even make the invading queens their rulers, killing their own natural leaders. He describes this process as a “perversion of instinct of the primary species of ants,” and notes the parallels with the actions of the Jewish power structure within human societies. The author saw Zionism as an addition to the Jewish problem, not a solution. Zionism, he said, “has supplied a head to the parasite which so far has worked separately within the bodies of various peoples.”

Certainly we see parallels to our situation today.

The philosopher Alfred Rosenberg presented an advanced view of Jewish parasitism in his best-selling 1930 book, The Myth of the 20th Century. He said that he was not passing a moral judgement on Jewish actions, hoping they would “repent” or change their ways, but rather was noticing a biological phenomenon, the instinctual behavior of a certain kind of organism that could no more be changed or repented of than a leech’s need to suck blood or a mosquito’s need to suck blood: “This conception shall in the first instance not be taken as a moral judgment but as biological reality, exactly in the same way in which we speak of parasitic occurrences in the life of plants and animals. The sacullina pierces the rectum of the common crab, and gradually grows into it and sucks away its vital forces; the same process occurs when the Jew invades society through the open wounds of the people, consuming their creative forces and hastening the doom of society.”

Hmmm…like the open wounds of European-European conflict.  No wonder the HBDers are in alliance with the ethnonationalists and the Nordicists.  Gotta give an opening to Moshe, eh?  How’s Unz dong these days?  Hey, Strom, are you going to call out those “White racialists” who write for Unz, peddling Unzian Judeo-HBD?

Rosenberg says that the parasites, which mix to some degree with their hosts the better to blend in with them and not be “seen,” are not a normal race, but a “counter-race” for whom lying was a kind of “truth.” He said: “To express it in a paradox: the permanent lie is the ‘organic truth’ of the Jewish counter-race.” The Jews also represented, he said, the “parasitic transvaluation of creative life.”

Like HBD lies.

Just as micro-parasites rush to enter your bloodstream through any cuts on your body, so also, Rosenberg says, “whenever a wound has been torn open in the body of a nation, the Jewish demon always eats into the sore spot, and exploits, parasite-like, the weak hours of the Great of this world. Not like a conquering hero does he strive for domination; this parasite, obsessed by his vision, is driven by the urge to make the world his tributary. Not fighting, but sneaking; not serving true values, but exploiting debased values: thus runs the unalterable law of his constellation from which he can never escape — as long as he exists.”

HBD marches on.

Questions for Strom:

1. To what extent do you believe that Jewish parasitical behavior is intentional, planned, coordinated, and malicious, and to what extent do you believe it is just an instinctual urge, in some ways codified by ethnic culture (“Judaism”) that allows Jews to behave in a manner that gives the appearance of acting in a coordinated fashion? Are both possible – an underlying instinctual basis exists, but it is given a powerful thrust in a sociopolitical direction by the most ethnocentric of Jews in the Jewish leadership?

2. Are you familiar with Bowery’s thesis of Jewish virulence?  Would preventing horizontal transmission of Jews – such horizontal transmission being, e.g., their jumping from one nation they’ve ruined to another, not-yet-ruined, nation, as well as having both Israel and the diaspora to jump between  – reduce Jewish virulence by forcing them to live amongst their consequences of their behavior?  Could we select for less destructive Jews?  Should we?

3. Based on the above, what are your concrete objectives, policies, and outcomes to deal with this group you term “parasitical” and how would you accomplish this?  Do you believe there are “less virulent” Jews who are assimilable and relatively non-parasitical? What about them?  What about part-Jews?

4. If you believe all you write about Jews, why don’t you speak out, directly and forcefully, about Jewish infiltration of “the pro-White movement” – particularly the HBD cult?

Ah…one commentator understands it.

why do you think all these iq stadistics are so promoted in places like unz and are the only white nationalist that are tacitly permited ? because stupid whites make the dirty job of the jews promoting their supremacism while they prepare the terrain for a race caste sistem once everyone have been brainwhased like in brave new world novel where every class was brainwhased since birth to accept his position ,iq racial stats do the same job.

Ball in your court, Strom.

Some of the comments here are interesting, particularly those about Puritans and how the Puritan mindset, including that promoted by their descendants, promote Jewish and Colored interests.  Remember Lind’s American Tribes thesis of a Yankee-Jewish-Black alliance?

The wanna-be Andrew Frasers at Counter-Currents weep.

Meet Anthony Imperiale.

He was born on July 10, 1931 in Newark, New Jersey. He later served in the United States Marine Corps during the Korean War. In the 1960s he opposed desegregation busing in the United States.

During the 1967 Newark riots, he advocated armed white self-defense, forming the volunteer North Ward First Aid Squad ostensibly to escort North Ward residents, most of whom were Italian-American, through racially troubled neighborhoods. The group was accused of vigilantism, and Governor Richard J. Hughes called Imperiale’s followers “Brownshirts”. In 1969, the group disbanded.

Afrowop Imperiale defended White interests, while ”Nordish” mick Hughes, a lace-curtain Irishman, opposed the “racists.”

Behold the newest Counter-Currents contributor:

I love the Amerindian people, and I am not really an American white nationalist who would keep them out of the USA or Canada; I would support that the Americas be returned to the Amerindian people, and Hispanic immigration to the USA is helping this process along. I would support investment in gene-editing technologies that could allow us to recreate authentic, pure Amerindian genomes and resurrect the real American people.

The world hates whites for the evil things whites have done in the past. I know the readers don’t like reading it; and I don’t like saying it, but this is the case.

I don’t like to say it anymore than anyone else, but whites have earned our hatred through our sins. Anti-white sentiment is not just jealousy, and it is not just looking down on us.

The pieces are starting to fit together, eh? If we assume that the HBD-ethnonationalist-Nordicist alliance is being manipulated behind the scenes by Judaized, anti-White, interests, none of this should come as a surprise. Keep on sending in the “D’Nations,” goys.

Shocker – Greg Johnson comes out in support of the high, high-IQ East Asian homosexual “traditionalist” Yukio Mishima.

Andrew Joyce – ball in your court.  Will you issue a riposte to Johnsonian flim-flam

Excerpts from such flim-flam and my own responses:

It would be all too easy to dismiss Mishima as a neurotic and a narcissist who engaged in politics as a kind of therapy. Right wing politics is crawling with such people…

Just look at Johnson and his crew of “writers” at Counter-Currents.

…(none of them with Mishima’s talents, unfortunately)…

And some of them with no talent whatsoever.

…and we would be better off without them. 

Pot meet kettle.

If a white equivalent of Mishima wished to write for Counter-Currents/North American New Right, we would welcome his work (as we would welcome translations of Mishima’s works!). But we would also keep him at arm’s length. Such people should be locked in a room with a computer and fed through a slot in the door. 

Is that how you feed James O’Meara?

They should not be put in positions of trust and responsibility.

Resign from your “leadership” position, Greg.

But Mishima is safely dead, and the meaning of his death cannot be measured in terms of crass political “deliverables.” Indeed, it is a repudiation of the whole calculus of interests that lies at the foundation of modern politics.

Huh? That comes from someone whose entire “political game” in Der Movement is appealing to the “crass” political (and economic) interests of other “movement leaders.”

Modern politics is based on the idea that a long and comfortable life is the highest value, to be purchased even at the price of our dignity.

Like writing for Unz?

Aristocratic politics is based on the idea that honor is the highest value, to be purchased even at the price of our lives.

How about the price of your “D’Nations?”

A natural slave is someone who is willing to give up his honor to save his life. Thus modern politics, which exalts the long and prosperous life as the highest value, is a form of spiritual slavery, even if the external controls are merely soft commercial and political incentives rather than chains and cages.

Sounds like folks like Johnson who write in a gilded cage, metaphorically “fed through a slot” by Unz.

EU Travel Advice and Other News

Advice and news.

This applies to Der Movement more than it does to conservatives.

But we should all support the Yang Gang, right? Gee, the Quota Queens have been really quiet about Yang recently.  Did they realize that they were making fools of themselves?

One possible idea for some Americans to get around travel bans to Europe (I do not have any suggestions for the reverse) is to investigate the possibility of obtaining dual citizenship in an EU nation. There are several mechanisms by which dual citizenship can be obtained and I will assume that the EU cannot ban their own citizens from traveling there.

There are of course certain potential problems/issues with this plan:

1. This option would most likely be available for only a very small fraction of people.

2. This would be something that would be most optimal as a preemptive mechanism, for people who have not yet become overt public activists. Of course, overt public activists can, and should, attempt this, if relevant to their individual cases, but I assume that the EU nations would simply refuse to issue dual citizenship to known “haters.”

3. It is also possible that an EU nation would strip dual citizenship from someone if and when they are identified as a “hater.”  I am not sure what the legal status of such stripping would be, but we know that the System does – or tries to do – anything it wants.

4. You would need to understand all the legal and political implications of dual citizenship.

Well, regardless of the details and the limited nature of this possibility, it is something to at least consider if circumstances allow.

Strom being an ignorant, anti-scientific jackass.

Autism rates are far lower in populations that don’t inject their children with Big Pharma products…

There is no evidence whatsoever linking vaccination (to which Strom undoubtedly refers) to autism. In the midst of a resurgence of measles, to imply otherwise is the height of irresponsibility.  If you are interested in correlations between autism and other factors, why don’t you take a look at the posts about autism at this blog – or look at Bowery’s work on the subject – and you’ll see alternative hypotheses that are far more likely to be correct than the “big scary needles causing problems” hysteria.  In my opinion, it’s more likely that there is a causative relationship (and not just a correlation) between diversity and autism than there is between vaccination and autism. By the way, concerning “Big Pharma products” you may wish to express concern about maintenance medication – where the big money is really made (*) – pushing pills for (in my opinion) imaginary diseases (attention deficit disorder) or for diseases caused by lifestyle choices (statins, metformin, blood pressure medication being used because the average American has the BMI of a black hole singularity).  Never mind putting every other person on “anti-depressants.”  But, alas, pills are not “scary needles” so no need to worry, eh?

*As well as cancer therapeutics that are exorbitantly expensive and prolong lifespan by, at most, months.

Summarizing Some Sallis Theories

Some Sallis theories.

The Sallis solution to the Fermi Paradox:

…racial diversity is the rule among sentient species; thus, highly divergent human racial types find their counterparts in significant racial variability among the alien peoples inhabiting worlds unknown. I further propose a Gresham’s law of universal racial diversity: the more intelligent and productive races of any sentient species will tend to be demographically outcompeted by the more stupid and useless races; the latter, despite their deficiencies for proximate values, are inevitably more fit with respect to the ultimate criterion of survival.  The threshold of technological competence for a detectable alien civilization would no longer obtain as the race or races capable of maintaining that civilization are replaced by those incapable.  Therefore, no such civilizations are detected.

The Sallis theory of autism.  Thus, the race recognition processing software of the amygdala (also involved in threat recognition) of Whites, particularly White children, is capable of easily distinguishing highly distinct racial types – Europeans, sub-Saharan Africans, (pure) Amerindians, and East Asians.  But the post-1965 immigration influx into America (and similar immigration influxes into Europe) has brought into White societies previously rare, more racially intermediate types – South Asians, heavily admixed Latin Americans, Middle/Near Easterners and North Africans. This phenotypically confusing racial diversity “scrambles” the amygdala of susceptible White children, increasing risk for autism.  Hence, the link between diversity and autism and, hence, an explanation for some of the population-autism correlations discovered by James Bowery some years ago.

As regards politics – my “Sallis strategy.”

Disease of the Heart

In all cases, emphasis added. 

A good quote from Bowery from TOO:

Hate is the reaction by the powerless to insular power. Accusing someone of “hate” is to accuse them of being powerless and, yourself, of identifying with insular power.

No surprise here: Derbyshire supports Antifa Jeff Sessions, and, of course, uses an anecdote about China to do it.  Hey, Derb, the whole world does not revolve around China, only your bedroom does.

As far as his argument goes, there are others who can do more in the fight against illegal immigration; it’s not hard to surpass someone standing around helplessly, looking dumbfounded.  And this other person may also not support leftist domestic terrorists by filing hate crime charges against someone who apparently was trying to flee in their car from a rifle-toting terrorist.  

But, Antifa Jeff is “America’s Senator,” “one of the boys,” so Derb will be on his side, let there be no doubt about it.

Then again, Antifa is a disease of the skin, but HBD race realist Yellow Supremacy is a disease of the heart, eh?

Durocher skating on thin “movement” ice here:

The Europeans north of Greece were generally considered barbaric and spirited, while Asians inhabiting Persia were considered effeminate and submissive. Barbarians were often thought incapable of civic self-government. The Phoenicians were sometimes perceived as having certain Semitic stereotypes (mercantile, dishonest, greedy, mercenary) but were also sometimes perceived as a fellow advanced people, comparably organized and capable in terms of trade, warfare, and civic self-government.

Hey!  What’s this?  “The Europeans north of Greece were generally considered barbaric and spirited…”  Why would the Ancient Greeks make any distinctions between themselves and the “Europeans north of Greece” when they were – quite obviously! – identical, genetically and phenotypically exactly one and the same?  

Durocher better watch out here; he’s going to get his official Der Movement, Inc. membership card revoked or something; this sort of blasphemy is not acceptable.

A quote from a Counter-Currents commentator:

I’ve taken the advice a previous commenter left, and tried to pick up a few hours of overtime each week, the money from which I use to support sites such as this and Arktos.

Arktos?  Say it ain’t so, Joe!  You might get “fired” as a Counter-Currents donor if you keep up such shenanigans!  Seriously though, here’s a perfect example of a problem discussed here.  Here we have a well-meaning fellow, working overtime, so he can give donations to folks who are no doubt living better than he is, and who are doing exactly what with the money?  Well, I guess whatever it is, it’s still better than giving money so that Brimelow and Derbyshire can sit on lawn chairs in the leafy suburbs of CT, smugly smiling for the camera.  Choices!  Choices!  Der Movement, Inc. provides endless choices for your hard-earned money, dear readers.  Keep on giving!  Make sacrifices!  You’ll be “living in the Golden Age” if you give up some of your golden shekels, don’t you know.

Read here.

White nationalism “went from being conversation you could hold in a bathroom, to the front parlor.”

It’s back in the bathroom now, I guess.  And why was it in the bathroom to begin with?  With all the fine work of Pierce, up there on the mountaintop of West Virginia, in the middle of the hub-bub of political life?

Sallis right again.  How many times have I, over the past few years here, stated that Spencer should have gone into electoral politics (he had all the qualities of a successful politician…read into that what you will), and that his indulgence as a two-bit junior fuhrer was a terrible mistake.  Well…

In 2010, Regnery asked Spencer to find candidates to lead the organization. Spencer suggested himself. 

At the time, leading such an explicitly racist organization carried great risks for someone with political ambitions. “I felt he was too accomplished and had too bright a career in the offing to accept a position that would forever brand him with the mark of Cain,” Regnery said. “I remember spending time gently trying to talk him out of the idea.” But he took the job, and in a speech last year Regnery said that putting Spencer in charge of NPI “secured my place in history.”

Well, now NPI is falling apart, so it’s not a good history.  Regnery’s first instinct was absolutely correct: someone else should have been put in place at NPI, and Spencer should have just been the political “face” of Der Movement.  After all, imagine if Spencer never acquired “the mark of Cain” – he would have been well-positioned to have run as a right-wing populist candidate this year, riding on Trump’s coattails.  Now, it’s all gone.  

Der Movement is a disease of the heart – it is a rapidly progressing cardiovascular disease killing racial activism.

Holding Whites Accountable

It didn’t “just happen.”

But here’s the problem with this complaint – which by the way I can 100% identify with, having lived through similar times myself (in that case, mostly with various types of Negroes and of mulatto Hispanics, rather than Mexicans) – how did this state of affairs come to pass?

That is not a rhetorical question, nor am I being facetious.  Let’s answer the question.  Whites have been – and continue to be – a majority of the American population, a majority of voters, and a majority of the population of places like Iowa.  Whites used to be a clear majority of the population of California.  Whites vote.  What happened?  Who elected the politicians who enabled this disaster to occur?  Who looked the other way for decades?  Who ignored the problem as long as it was in someone else’s backyard and not their own?  Who ignored the plight of urban Whites (particularly if those were “White ethnics”)?

All of this didn’t “just happen.”

Please study this video, and pay particular attention to the 40 seconds from 3:20-4:00 – McCain’s infamous “build the danged fence” campaign video, made when Amnesty John was facing some heat from his right on immigration.  I remember noting that video at the time, and thinking to myself: “the GOP voters of Arizona can’t be that stupid, can they?  I mean, it’s obvious – obvious – that McCain’s lying to them, and he’ll go back to shilling for amnesty, and against any enforcement, once elected.  I mean, he’s being playing that game for a long time; surely, they are wise to him now, right?  Indeed, the GOP as a whole does this, feinting right for elections, and then governing like liberal Democrats.”

Well, no, the GOP voters of Arizona were fooled once again, and even though they howled their betrayal, they still continued to support the evil scum McCain, and are crying bitter tears over his death.  

This has been the Republican playbook for decades.  They dog whistle implicitly on race – VERY implicitly – to gather White support for Necon agendas and for the same big business interests bringing in the hordes to begin with.  And the rubes fall for the scam time and again.

Here’s where I part company with Bowery and all the rest: Whites need to be held accountable for their stupidity, fecklessness, and painful naiveté.  

The key part of that man’s lament, from the short essay Bowery presented:

Am I racist? Jesus, am I becoming one of those guys. I sure sound like one of those guys.

“Those guys.”  You see, the only people who have a solution to the problem (let’s ignore for the moment that Der Movement, Inc. is a fraud; I’m referring to racial nationalism in general) are considered “those people,” as alien as the Latinos, freaks to be dismissed and despised.  This fellow sounds like he considers being one of “those people” just as bad – nay, even worse! – than what has happened to his town, his community, his nation.  “Jesus,” indeed.

One wonders who this fellow voted for.  McCain?  Romney?  Maybe even Obama?

Accountability?

Every time I read, or hear, a lament like this, every time some anti-White outrage occurs, every time the borders are opened even more, what I do – and what I suggest we all do – is trace things back to the beginning.  Why are these things allowed to happen?  Answer: Those in a position of leadership allow it to happen; in many cases, they support and promote it.  

Well, then, how and why are they in this position of power to begin with?  If elected, it is because an electorate that is majority White elected them (and the same applies overseas – who elected Merkel?).  If they are in a position  of power economically, it is because a consumer base that is majority White continues to purchase their goods and services; Whites being incapable of organizing boycotts on the basis of racial interests like any other group.  If the power derives from fame and celebrity, it is because a majority White population provides that fame and celebrity.

Oh, you will cry – “It’s the Jews!  The Jews!”   Trace that back.  Who let the Jews into America?  Who let the Jews rise to prominence and seize the media?  Who kowtows to Jewish interests?  Who serves as the Shabbos goy traitor class?  We’re back again to the White elites – the politicians elected by Whites, the moguls funded by White consumers, the celebrities whose fame derives from White fan worship.

The same applies if you want to scream about “moneyed interests” or “the managerial class” or “The Federal Reserve” or “the SJWs” or whatever pet peeve you have: these things didn’t “just happen.”  To paraphrase Pareto: if a wolf is eating you, it is because you chose to be a sheep.  If Whites choose to be a race of sheep, they should not be surprised about all the wolves gorging themselves on the white-flocked sheeple.

Trace things back to first principles.  Things do not “just happen.”  And screaming about “the Jews” is a crutch to avoid dealing with the need to hold Whites accountable for their own lowly position.

And I have to laugh at the Roissyite HBD Nordicist gamesters getting all hot and bothered about a single German (of course) rally – yes sir, “the Saxon begins to hate!”  How about “the Saxon” voting for even the milquetoast moderate right-wing Alternative For Germany (never mind the NPD), instead of putting Merkel in power over and over again?  Another example of Der Movement’s victory psychosis, and their Germans on White Horse Syndrome.

I suppose it’s another example of White fecklessness that they are “represented” by a “racial movement” composed of retards and fetishistic morons.

Bowery is Right about This

Responding to Griffin.

Read this.

My view is somewhere in between that of Griffin and his critics.  I agree with the critics that Griffin underestimates the immense pressures and restraints imposed on White men, particularly young White men trying to make their way in a vehemently anti-White, Colored Privilege America.  On the other hand, Griffin is correct that there are options other than a quixotic and suicidal gesture such as that of “Sky King.”

James Bowery has, I believe, a good perspective on this.  After citing this publication, Bowery states:

Young white males are well advised NOT to “suck it up and buckle down to serve the economy and social stability,” as Dr. Griffin does, but rather to organize in such a way as to destabilize society and do so identifiably as young white males.

This is consistent with my call for approaches that enhance societal and demographic balkanization.  Remember Salter’s dictum: the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is a multiculturalism that does – since the latter efficiently and quietly, without much fuss, manages the race replacement of native White populations.  If multiculturalism does not work, it may produce enough societal pain to induce cowardly and feckless Whites to begin to understand the problem and do something about it.  

So, young White males should destabilize society and they must do so in a racially identifiable manner so as to heighten the contradictions, provoke responses, and balkanize society along racial lines.

To paraphrase that Batman movie – “some people just want to watch the world burn.”  

Indeed.

None Dare Call It Hypocrisy

Well, actually, I dare.

I see it as highly hypocritical that the same “movement” “leaders” – all the quota queens – endlessly complain about being “deplatformed” (and use that as part of their equally endless tin cup panhandling), while at the same time these “leaders” behave the same way with respect to racialist dissidents who honestly critique the “movement” and its “leaders” – “ban” them, essentially “deplatform” them from the central media centers of (what passes for) “movement” discourse.

It is important to clear up some matters lest I be accused of hypocrisy or inconsistency.  First, I do agree with the argument – made, for example, by Bowery at Majority Rights when he and I were both participating at that blog – that freedom of association trumps freedom of speech.  I further made the argument at my own blogs that freedom of speech does not obligate anyone to host any specific type of speech at their own forum; again, freedom of association is above freedom of speech, as long as that speech has somewhere else to go. So, yes, I agree that a blog owner can “ban” anyone they want from their site, and that “banned” person can go and set up their own blog and do their own thing elsewhere on the Internet.  After all, that’s ultimately why this blog exists (and, if I remember correctly, for example, Majority Rights was established after its founders were essentially declared persona non grata at Gene Expression).  I have also argued, in like sense, that a blog can be viewed as a form of political warfare, and so why should political soldiers benefit their enemies by facilitating those enemies’ dissemination of their ideas?  There is no obligation to host your enemy.  Very good, but is a fellow racial activist really an “enemy” because they criticize some of your ideas and actions?  Because they state that you should be held accountable for mistakes (according to your own declared standards of behavior)?  Are fellow activists the functional equivalent of SJW leftists?

It is also true that there is a difference between being banned from a blog (or a set of blogs) and having a major (albeit privately owned) company, which is functionally equivalent to a public utility, banning its use by an entire class of people based on, for example, their political views.  However, the “why should you assist the enemy?” argument cuts both ways here.  The owners of Amazon, Twitter, PayPal, etc. can argue – why should they be obligated to support their enemies?  Oh, you say that they are so successful that they are equivalent to public utilities and so they must be obligated to serve everyone.  Very well.  Imagine the same principle is turned inward to the “movement” – some “movement” blogs, sites, groups, and organizations are so successful (within the “movement” itself) that they are equivalent to “movement” “public utilities” and so they must be obligated to serve all racial activists, even those they disagree with.  I’m sure that violation of freedom of association would be rejected, even though in principle the argument is the same (adjusted for scale between society-at-large and the “movement”).

I’m not making a legalistic argument in this post; instead, I’m making a moral one, based on principles, and based on character and integrity (or the lack therefore in Der Movement).  The basic truth is that these “leaders” are endlessly whining about being deplatformed by private companies, and they behave the same way to racial activist dissidents they do not like.  The scale is different, but the basic principle is the same, and most of the arguments as to why private companies should be obligated to interface with, and serve, the “movement” as a whole can be made to argue that the “movement” as a whole needs to interface with the dissidents within its ranks.

Basically, I see the behavior of the “leaders” as being one of cowardice – fear of engaging with dissident critics and those critics’ ideas – as well as the prima donna sense of entitlement that derives from being products of the “movement’s” affirmative action program – how dare anyone criticize them!  Why should they stoop to answering critics?.  Low character hypocrites: behold the Type I Quota Queen “Leadership” of Der Movement: fearfully hiding from those who would critique their flawed ideas and those who would hold them accountable for their failures.

Note: Someone may point out that my own blogs have traditionally never had comments sections.  That is true.  First, I’m not a fan of such sections, the signal-to-noise ratio is poor; most “movement” comments threads of full of asinine Type I activists, trolls, fetishists, defectives, and “antis.”  Second, and even more importantly, unlike our “fearless leaders,” I am not a full time professional activist (living off of supporters’ donations). I’m merely a part-time amateur; I simply do not have the time to deal with comments; to my mind, it is more important, and more prudent, to invest my limited time in producing new content.  However, our heroic leaders are indeed full time activists with free time aplenty, they are people who believe that comments sections have value, so there is obviously a difference between my blog and theirs in that regard.