Category: Japan

Silk Road News: Outrageous Hypocrisy

Colored is as colored does.

Get this spewing of outrageous anti-White hypocrisy:

See, this is the thing. The Americans don’t really have the right to tell Japan to stop propagating Nihonjinron narratives.
Japan is basically a place for Japanese (and Zainichi Koreans too, who also belong) to live. Others may be admitted, but only the Japanese state can decide that.
To have any White person try to redefine the identity of the country by force from the outside would be a form of neocolonial imposition which should not be tolerated.

This is the most outrageous hypocrisy imaginable.  At the same time, this diseased Oriental lives in a White nation, believes that “British Asians” (of which she is one, presumably) are legitimate, hectors Whites on pro-White blogs, lectures Whites on pro-White blogs on how Whites should behave, transformed Majority Rights into a “safe space” for Asian supremacy, and criticizes Australia’s attempts to protect itself from invasion.

Majority Rights must rank high among the leading anti-White hate sites on the Internet. Ultimately, I blame the White males (not men) at that barren wasteland for putting up with this; if they had any testicular fortitude, they’d kick this alien the hell off of what used to be a pro-White blog and return it to its proper roots.  And that goes for the lulzing commentators as well as for blog owners and posters.

It’s All One

The Asian menace.

We can ask why this execrable and ugly Filipina turd is even doing infesting America, like a flea on a dog.  But how is that hate-filled Asiatrix any different from those infesting White (sic) nationalism?  In response to Sunic’s fine essay at TOO, that Chinese Nationalist Maiden creature, who keeps on turning up like a bad penny, pops up to lecture Europeans on our ethnic differences.  Excuse me, but we do not need some Cantonese slut pontificating to Europeans about our business, thank you very much. Likewise, we do not need hate-filled Japotrices lecturing us about how we need to “inflict harm” on Russians in order to serve Asian interests.

Inflict harm on Russians?  I for one would love to see Russians inflict some harm on Asians, particularly on those mangy yellow dogs infiltrating into Russia’s Far East.  Let’s have some brawny Slavs go there and grab those diseased Chinamen by their scruffy necks and toss them back over the Amur.  If Russia had a real nationalist leader, the Asian contagion would have been cleaned out of Russian territory long ago.

So, in the end, how do these infiltrators of WN differ from Felarca?  Answer: they do not. Unfortunately, WN is infested with the same sort of mewling yellow fever faggots that characterize White males (not men) these days, who will, in a breathless and sweaty fashion, say or do anything to keep estrogen-deficient Asian females around.  Further: how do these infiltrators of WN differ from the Chinamen oozing into the Russian Far East like raw sewage leaking through a home’s cracked foundation?  Answer: they do not.

It’s all one.  All one and the same.  The yellow fist of hatred manifests itself in many ways, but in all cases, represents an existential denial of the West and blinding hatred of the White race.  From the Asian perspective, that denial and hatred might be normal, but Whites are under no obligation to accept it, much less facilitate it.

More Asian Perfidy, 7/26/16

Asians, Asiatics, and Desis, oh my.


Why say anything?  After all, it’ll be mostly White Americans getting sick and dying, and who care about those long-nosed, hairy barbarians, eh?

That cogelite’s disdain for “cranky old White folks” is just dripping like venom from his brown, alien, Desi mouth.  But even a far-leftist knows what Conservatism, Inc. wants to avoid acknowledging: non-Whites care not for conservatism, only “cranky old Whites” do, and those “cranky old Whites” have grown tired of alien Asiatic filth like Roy talking down to them, taking them for granted (while expecting their votes like a feudal lord expects his serfs’ services), and ignoring their interests and desires.  Mainstream conservatism is becoming an ideology without a constituency, as Whites begin to wake up, thanks to Der Touchback and his incoherent campaign.

Scum like Roy fail to understand that their own contemptuous dismissal of Whites and White interests is to a large degree responsible for the rise of Trump and the demise of mainstream conservatism.
Alien filth Zakaria – the face that launched a thousand autisms– gets put in his place by Putin.  Congratulations to Trad Vlad for sticking a metaphorical thumb in the eye of Zakaria’s leering Asiatic countenance.

Genocidal Mongrels

Hold Back Those Mongrels (proposed title for new racialist novel).


I previously wrote about the “Mixed Race Mentality” – and the same arguments apply to the Taylor debate and Taylor’s opponent.  The mixed race (and their parents – hello, Derb!) have a chip on their shoulder, a smoldering rage against the unmixed (“inbred” and “incest” for example, or always exulting over the proposed future non-existence of persons of native European stock, or even of native Japanese stock), and a desire to make everyone admixed like them.

In this sense, we may get a better perspective on both Jayman and Derbyshire.  And I also did read on Majority Rights some time ago that “Razib” is married to a White woman (I do not know the veracity of that claim).  All the pieces are starting to fit together, and the assembled puzzle turn out to be quite an ugly picture indeed.

A Tale of Two Non-Whites

The second situation is just puzzling.

First, it’s Johnson vs. Roosh, Part II. At some point, I hope that the “movement” gives up on all this PUA nonsense. The whole point of the “movement” – if we take their statements at face value – is “what is best for the White race.” Therefore, of course, sexual activity needs brakes, needs controls. The idea that non-White men should NOT be sex-trolling around Europe is a feature of WN, not a bug. I thought all of this was obvious?
Second, here is a statement made by an individual claiming to be a Japanese female, concerning the upcoming “Brexit” vote in the UK:

Assuming that nothing about this insane situation changes by June, I will vote ‘Leave’ on the referendum when it is placed in front of me. I would have no other choice.

That can be interpreted two ways. The more charitable interpretation is: “IF I was a Briton living in the UK, I would vote to leave the EU.” The less charitable interpretation, and the one more consistent with the wording is: “I live in the UK with the right to vote there, and I will vote to leave.”
The first interpretation is a perfectly reasonable expression of opinion. The second interpretation, if true, essentially completely invalidates the entire blog/website on which it is found. Isn’t the whole point of racial nationalism to have racial separation: nation-building based upon race (and culture)? This is WN, not Derbyshirian HBD.
Somewhat supporting the second interpretation is:

From my perspective this is all a complete disaster in the making, of a kind that will have far-reaching ramifications and probably will impact my purse directly in some measurable way.

Directly? Regardless of how this statement influences which of the abovementioned two interpretations is true, the statement on its face is bizarre. Do the British people need to worry about how their decision affects a Japanese woman’s “purse?”
Wait, there is more:

However, I would not be angry with the British people if they chose to throw in the towel and give up on the European Union Project now.

The British people do not require the permission or approval of foreigners to decide the national future of the UK.
What is the main point of Brexit? It would seem that the two main issues are Sovereignty and Immigration. That being so, it would seem that the opinions and interests – much less votes! – of East Asians should be irrelevant. The idea that Japanese people should in any way influence this decision is the very thing Brexit is supposed to oppose.
Indeed, the only people who should be allowed to vote on Brexit are UK citizens whose ancestry derives from one or more of the following sources, and these sources only: English, Scottish, Scots-Irish, Welsh. No one else, regardless of “citizenship” or “place of birth,” should have any rights in this regard whatsoever.

More Fisking, 1/17/16

::Yawn::

…one person who is clearly a disgruntled past contributor.

That’s right. I’m clearly no damn good.  How about removing my EGI PDF from your anti-White Yellow Supremacist website?  How many goddamn times do I have to ask, Madame Butterfly?

While Sallis apparently bemoans the Soviet sufferings in the example of the Sino-Soviet border conflict of 1969, the normal answer/position for anyone who cares about Europeans and European EGI: with regard to which side to take in the Sino-Soviet conflict is of course the Chinese side.

Daniel S: race-traitor.

This is like a case of chess vs. checkers. If you are playing checkers (which apparently Sallis is doing) then you’ll scream, “Russians are white and therefore they should be blindly supported no matter what they do, because their skin is very white!”

No worries, I won’t always support the White.  After all, in a theoretical death-match (think Highlander, with the swords) between Yukio Mishima and Daniel S, my full support would go to Mishima.  By the way, anyone familiar with my work knows full well I do not conflate race to skin color.  Why don’t you read the EGI PDF before you delete it?

Or, you could play chess and realise that the Sino-Soviet split was one of the most exploitable things that ever happened for people who were struggling against the Soviet Union.

Or you can play “chess” and realize that the Yellow Peril is the ultimate long-term threat to the White race, and that a short-term “checkers” advantage derived from supporting chanting yellow insects does not justify that ultimate strategic threat down the road.

ALSO: Given the rhetoric that he is throwing around, I wouldn’t be surprised if Sallis will next declare that Adolf Hitler and the entire general staff of the German Army in NS Germany, as well as Benito Mussolini and the whole PNF, were somehow magically ‘race traitors’ to the European peoples because they chose to work with or enable the following militant groups of people against certain European groups: Japan, Korea (yes, large sections of Korean society fought in the IJA and collaborated with Axis), the Burmese National Army, the Indian National Army, Indonesian National Army, Young Malays Union, Thailand, the Philippines, Formosa (non-KMT Han in Taiwan and Taiwanese aboriginals), Mongolia, Crimean Tatars, Hmong tribes, Khmer Issarak (Cambodian and Khmer), Cambodia, Laos, Cochinchina (later part of Vietnam), Annam (later part of Vietnam), Tonkin (later part of Vietnam), Manchuria, Tibet, Assam, Bengal. I can’t wait to see the rationalising or perhaps the spinning that will happen next.

Don’t seem to remember either individual (Adolf or Benito) proposing Chinese colonization of White lands so that White faglets can be protected by buck-toothed, flat-chested Chinese girls with guns. And I note that Hitler quashed von Ribbentrop’s triumphalist announcement of the Fall of Singapore (which Hitler regretted) because of concerns over the Yellow Peril (see Irving’s Hitler’s War).  The alliance with Japan was due to the UK’s refusal to see reason, and the idea that Japan could be a counter-balance to the USSR.  Of course, the crafty nips stabbed Adolf in the back by signing a non-aggression treaty with the USSR, but – again, of course – expected German support after Pearl Harbor (which they got, proving again that Euro-Asian alliances are for the benefit of Asians only).
Further, both sides in both world wars made use of colored auxiliaries; both sides were at fault, and both are worthy of condemnation, your mendacious Asiatic.
By the way, one can make all sorts of excuses for arrogant Japanese behavior, re: 1914 and English overseas colonies.  I can’t wait for the “spin and rationalizations” for the protests of Asian nations, including Japan, for America’s Asian exclusion acts.  Oh, you see, White lands are obligated to take leprous, tubercular, Asian immigrants (but of course never the reverse).

Asking ‘who would you support’ and presenting the dichotomy of supporting the USSR on one hand or the PRC on the other. The answer to that question is already known, Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford supplied that answer. In the circumstances that had come to exist at the time, that was the best possible choice that could have been made. 


Perhaps, gook, we’ll know what the “right choice” was when the final information is at hand.  Me, I think Nixon should have agreed to let the USSR nuke China.  If the White world ends up buried under a Yellow mudslide (with Danny masturbating and flagellating himself simultaneously), then I would think Nixon and Ford were in error.

Your blog should change its name, unless the “majority” in Majority Rights represents the populations of East Asia.  As a vehicle for specifically European interests, the site is a treasonous, pathetic joke.

Reality vs. Mr. Derbyshire, 12/11/15

Japan.

Main point here: The Japanese have been doing the long-term thinking about demographics that we haven’t been doing; and they’ve been doing it for 76 years. 

What have they concluded from all that thinking? Well, here’s a thing they have not concluded: They have not concluded that mass immigration is the solution to their demographic problems. They believe they can keep their standard of living — one of the world’s highest — maintain their technological advantages, and manage their national debt, without importing millions of foreign workers. There is no constituency in Japan favoring mass immigration. In Japan, even business moguls are patriotic.


TOKYO (Reuters) – Japan should craft an “integrated” immigration policy to cope with its shrinking population, or risk losing out to an ageing China in competition for vital foreign workers, the cabinet minister for administrative reform said on Thursday.