Category: Jews are not White

The JQ In A Nutshell

Brief and to the point.

Read here.  Emphasis added:

For Jews living in Western societies, however, the migrants aren’t the only outgroup. Western peoples and cultures themselves are an outgroup— see my book Separation and Its Discontents. Hence one would expect Jewish negative attitudes toward both immigrants and the host white culture. 

So Jewish attitudes could be analyzed as simply whichever outgroup summons up the greater hostility. And Jewish attitudes are primarily determined by their hostility towards whites.

Thus, to Jews, Whites are (outgroup) enemy number one.  Here we see Identity in its totality, a combination of genes, phenotypes, religion and other aspects of culture, history, and self-conception.  One cannot conflate Jewish Identity to any one of these things, it is all of them in combination.  Those who focus on one and try to ask “are Jews White?” miss the point entirely.  In the last analysis, Jews themselves view themselves as a separate people, and that is how they should be viewed by us.

Metroland on the NPI Alt-Right Press Conference

More evidence that the HBD faction must be eschewed.

Of interest, emphasis added:

Taylor of American Renaissance talked of the intrinsic whiteness, or European-ness of America as nation, and refuted the notion that defending the national heritage is “racist” or “white supremacist” (since East Asians, as he never tires of reminding us, seem to have higher average IQs).

“Never tires” is a bit of an understatement. “Breathlessly, with excitement” seems more accurate.  And what’s wrong with racism?

People who had never heard of the Alt Right before now suddenly knew what a Pepe meme was.

And some of us wish we didn’t know.

So the journalists who showed up for the NPI press conference on Friday –from the Washington Post, The Daily Beast, Mother Jones, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, inter alia — knew they were at a watershed moment in American politics. Hillary was foundering, Trump had evened out the polls and would likely be the next President. 

Likely? I mean, it’s possible, and the odds have improved recently, but…likely? At best, even money.

Regardless of the election outcome, the Alt Right was now something to be taken seriously: people like Spencer, Brimelow, and Taylor might well be determining public policy for years to come.

Dear god…no. I have nothing against Spencer, who represents the more healthy Alt-Right WN faction, but if you let the Alt-Wrong HBDers determine public policy, Asians and Jews will have the “whip hand” over Whites for perpetuity (is that a situation Derbyshire is familiar with in his own domestic arrangements?).

The JQ did come up eventually, as the press conference wound down. Each of the speakers was queried, directly and indirectly, on whether Jews could be white/European/American. And Taylor, Spencer, and Brimelow gave the classic answers we have come to expect.  

Basically — Taylor: Yes, if some identify as such and share the proper values. 

Sigh. The Alt-Right really needs to make some decisions here, and by “Alt-Right” I mean the WNs.

Spencer: No, because they regard themselves as different. 

That’s very reasonable.

Brimelow: My answer is somewhere in between.

What is it Pete? A quantum superposition between “yes” and “no?”

“I don’t think our support of Trump is about policy, at the end of the day — it’s about style,” Spencer said. “We live in a fragmented, decaying society. We live in a society of moral degeneracy. We’re going to fight our way out it, and sometimes that means using the tools at hand. It’s going to mean unleashing a little chaos.”

That sounds familiar. Where have I ever heard that before?

Der Movement in the News, 9/9/16

Several items.

He published “The Roots of the White Man” under a pseudonym, but only because it ranged widely over areas of scholarship in which Francis was not a recognized expert.

If “not a recognized expert” really means “he didn’t know what the hell he was talking about” then I agree.
Jews do not consider themselves “White.” Yes, indeed, and that post quotes a Jew who admits that. The “JQ” is a matter of total Identity, not any fraction thereof.

Beyond that, we’re flexible. We would believe in the divinity of a smug green frog or real estate mogul if we thought he’d reward our affections by blessing us with virtù and hale prolificacy.

Finally, I wonder: If Trump is the “last chance” and “last hope” of White America, according to the Alt-Right, then why are those self-same Alt-Righters doing all they can to sabotage their God Emperor’s stately (and dignified!) inexorable procession to the White House?

Race in the News, 9/6/16

Two items.

Alinsky’s farting Negroes.  What I take away from that story is the following. Yes, Alinsky has the typical rat-faced, leering levantine look of the typical Jew.  And, likely, his genetics would have revealed his ancestry.  But those are just two components of overall Identity.  it is in their totality that Jews are alien to Europeans – that of course includes physical appearance and genetics (but not always in every case), but, also, self-conception, behavior, history, culture, and religious belief (where it exists).  Alinsky perceived himself as belonging to a different people than the White Gentiles he wished to offend with his planned vulgar display, he viewed himself as a member of a radically different tribe at war with those self-same White Gentiles.  Indeed, purely biological characteristics do not capture the extent of these differences; in a sense, Alinsky was as alien to those White Gentiles as any Negro could ever be.  That’s the real lesson here.

The real shocker is that Merkel has any political viability left in Germany at all, and is not already on trial for treason and crimes against humanity.

Behold the Parasite

Jews and net EGI.

Of course, Jews are neither wasps nor fungi, nor do they stand in the same relationship to us as do the parasitic wasps and fungi to their hosts just mentioned. Jews are either a closely related species to us, or are a subspecies of the same species. In either case, as repulsive as are parasites, and as loathe as we may be to admit it, Jews are genetically quite similar to us and are in fact extensively cross-bred with us. Doesn’t this effectively rule out their being biological parasites upon us? 

No, not at all. In fact, it makes it even more likely. In 1909, an Italian entomologist named Carlo Emery discovered what is now known as Emery’s Rule. The rule states that that social parasites (that is, parasites of social species — and Homo sapiens is certainly a social species) tend to be parasites of species or genera to which they are closely related. Matt Johnston of the University of Arizona states that, “One explanation for the apparently close relationship between social parasites and their hosts is that in order to get past the hosts’ defenses, the parasite needs to have evolved communication systems similar to the host. This may be more likely if the two share a close evolutionary history.”

This is why I talk about the importance of net genetic interests (not that anyone listens). If all you care about are gross genetic interests, then you would simply measure the genetic distances involved, calculate the child equivalents, and conclude that since Jews are genetically quite similar to, and cross-bred with, Europeans, then their presence in Western societies does not exert much of an EGI cost at all. However, Jews are a highly specialized, evolved parasitic ethny with interests that are incompatible with that of Europeans, and as such Jewish behavior exerts a significant fitness cost on Europeans, so that the net effect on European EGI is enormous. Therefore, net EGI takes into account all factors that affect the genetic interests of an ethny, and provides a final tally of the outcome. If Jews promote mass alien immigration, desegregation, miscegenation, and overall societal degeneration (that imposes severe costs on, among other things, family stability and reproductive success), then their presence is extremely destructive to host EGI regardless of what the relative genetic distances are between Jews and White Gentiles. Further, if Jews consider themselves a different group than are White Gentiles, and pursue a group evolutionary strategy of their own, they would not care that their behavior damages the interests of an ethny relatively genetically similar to their own. Of course, Identity is based upon more than just genetic distances, and issues of Identity, by influencing behavior, directly affect genetic interests.

Strom Knows His Jews

Amusing but accurate observations.

Read here.Seth Rich, to a seasoned observer, looked quite Jewish (of the puffy-faced, tiny-eyed, freely-perspiring blond type)…

I had to laugh reading that, since Strom quite clearly identifies a Jewish sub-type one can observe anywhere there is a concentration of Jews. As someone with much life experience with many diverse ethnies – including Jews – I know very well the type Strom describes.

Like so many Semites, Rich was also relatively tasteless and had no sense of restraint — as evidenced by the clown-like “stars and stripes” suit in which he recently allowed himself to be photographed. He also was not especially intelligent, as evidenced by his vapid political blathering on the Internet, which included such gems as: “We have to be better and defend each other more true. A life is exponentially valuable. I have family and friends on both sides of the law.” 

That Semitic lack of restraint is a general, not a particular, psychological quality — that is, it applies to a lot more than just clothing.

Another accurate observation.

As “Director of Voter Outreach” for the DNC, Seth Rich was in the business of creating deadly weapons aimed at White people’s lives, and he was caught in a crossfire of his own making.

Quite right.

Today we received news that the illegitimate NARRG group’s lawsuit, designed to turn over our National Alliance to a court-appointed “receiver,” has just been dismissed with prejudice, meaning that it cannot be reinstituted. The NARRG grouplet, which has recently joined with Jewish organizations and operatives in its efforts to destroy the National Alliance, will probably not stop its attempts to cadge donations from the well-meaning dupes who send it money, but their lawsuit is now dead, dead, dead — unless they can convince the Virginia Supreme Court to hear an appeal; a very unlikely outcome, especially considering the earlier ruling of the court that the grouplet had no standing to sue in the first place.


Sigh. Wouldn’t it be better just to start fresh and new without all the baggage from the Pierce era?

Why Do Jews Look The Way The Do?

A hypothesis.
I have been seeing some “far-right” sites discussing the issue of Jewish physical appearance, and I remember one site having its members put up a rather extensive gallery of pictures of repulsive Jewish celebrities, which quite literally made me physically nauseous.  These sites usually discuss theories for the stereotypical physical appearance of (Ashkenazi) Jews, often invoking the “inbreeding” argument (see below).  Although I am really not interested in these HBD-style discussions, the trauma inflicted by viewing some of those faces has led me to propose my own ideas on this subject.
Two points.  First, this is not meant as any type of criticism or insult toward Jews.  It is instead a relatively dispassionate discussion of a very real phenomenon.  Most people, including I believe most Jews, understand that this is a group known for brains not beauty.  Of course, there are always exceptions; in biological phenomena, outliers always exist.  The existence of these exceptions by no means invalidates the reality that the typical Ashkenazi Jewish phenotype is very well represented by the likes of Anthony Weiner and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Second, this is a hypothesis, not a dogmatic insistence of reality.  Unlike the “movement” and HBD, I do not have The Lathe of Heaven Syndrome, there is no solipsism here.  Therefore, I do not cite data but merely provide ideas that constitute a hypothesis that requires more empirical testing.
I’m not going to bring up “Jewish inbreeding” as a mechanism for their physical defects, for the simple reason that some HBDers (e.g., Cochran) have been making a big song-and-dance about how the whole bottleneck/inbreeding thing for Jews is not true; I haven’t really looked at the data since I am not very interested.  I can make my arguments without invoking inbreeding and will therefore go ahead and do so.
Instead, here I assert that two major mechanisms account for the typically repulsive physical appearance of (Ashkenazi) Jews: their particular ancestral origins in the modern Middle/Near East coupled to admixture, and the lack of subsequent sexual selection for improved (mostly female) appearance.
Ashkenazi Jews are thought to have originated in the modern Middle/Near East in historical times, followed by entry into Europe and a significant initial degree of admixture with native Europeans (the paradigm is Middle Eastern males with European females; the Europeans initially were likely mostly Southern Europeans, with, later, Germanics and Slavs entering the picture as Jews infiltrated to the north and east).  The Middle Eastern origin of Jews is well revealed by the phenotypes of Jews such as Weiner, which betray (the nose! the nose!) the Near Eastern-Semitic-Araboid antecedents.  Many stereotypical Jewish physical traits, particularly facial traits, likely have their origin in this derivation from NEC Middle Eastern population streams.  However, that is not the full story.  After all, despite similarities, there are differences in appearance between Jews and Arabs; furthermore, the distinctive Ashkenazi appearance has more to do with an overall disharmonious, discordant, off-putting “affect” than it does with any grouping of single features (e.g., noses).  Therefore, it is not only the Middle Eastern origin that is the mechanism here, but the subsequent hybridization with European stocks, which led to a discordant mismatch of NEC and European features, a disharmonious combination of features that fit poorly together.  Even further, one can speculate that this combination never stabilized into a harmonious blend because of a lack of sexual selection for physical appearance, which is the subject of the next part of this analysis.
Many (most?) human groups have undergone some degree of sexual selection for physical appearance.  In many (Eurasian) groups, this is most directed at the female, but of course male appearance is also affected through inheritance of maternal traits.  Some HBDers (e.g., Frost) assert that this mechanism was most highly developed in the northern climes of Europe during the hunter-gatherer times (cue “movement” heavy breathing at the mention of hunter-gatherers), and this is likely true.  In any case, sexual selection for appearance occurred throughout Europe and in many areas of Asia as well.  It may well have also occurred in Negro Africa, but there focusing on male appearance (I do not speculate on Amerinds, but possibly they too partook in this mechanism, for which sex predominantly I do not know).
Jews, however, I see as different.  For them, sexual selection was about intelligence, ability, family connections, business or intellectual success.  A physically grotesque Jewess may very well have found eager marriage partners if she was the daughter of a successful businessman, rabbinical scholar, or some other sort of community leader. Thus, she would pair up with an equally grotesque male Jew, from an equally successful family, and they would produce ugly yet intelligent children, with a greater probability of survival than the children (if any were produced) of less intelligent Jews (of whatever physical appearance). Thus, for Jews, there was no “gracilization” of physical appearance that could have attenuated the distortions and unpleasant features derived from their unique ancestral origins. The Weiner and Bader Ginsburg phenotypes were thus perpetuated, along with high verbal intelligence, high ethnocentrism and neurotic intensity, and other stereotypical Jewish traits.
To summarize: The hypothesis is that the stereotypical (Ashkenazi) Jewish appearance is due to their origins rooted in the modern Middle/Near East, coupled to discordant admixture with European stocks, creating phenotypes that never became aesthetically stabilized and gracilized due to a lack of sexual selection for beauty.