Category: Jews vs. Gentiles

The Ascent of Saint Adolf

Brief book review. 

Reading this relatively new Hitler book, which concentrates on the first 50 years of Hitler’s life (1889-1939) I note that it contains the usual snide, conformist, and biased anti-Hitler and anti-NS comments one comes to expect from politicized hacks. The anti-Hitler and anti-NS comments come fast and furious; after all, Mr. Ullrich, the author, has to maintain his status in polite society as a good-white cuck (and also does not want to suffer the same fate as David Irving, eh?).

One example of Ullrich’s gratuitous anti-Hitlerism is his smug labelling of the grand architectural plans of Hitler and Speer as “sheer insanity” and “megalomania.”  In contrast, I view those plans as inspiring, and as a reasonable model of what a European Imperium should build – nay, even greater than Hitler and Speer had planned!  

Hitler and Speer planned for the ages, planned for eternity, planned for what they hoped would be a German Empire.  What would the likes of Ullrich wish to see instead, I wonder?  A “Germany” full of mosques, perhaps, with NECs running wild in the streets and African Negroes swinging from the trees?  If that’s what they wish, they are, thanks to Mama Merkel, well along in those developments. “Germany” as a subaltern cuck nation colonized by the Third World: that sounds like a textbook definition of “sheer insanity” to me.

Particularly amusing is the author’s description of the Nuremberg race laws as an example of “grotesque senselessness” because of some sort of alleged inability of the Nazis to define Jewish ancestry (which, for some mysterious reason, the Jews themselves were perfectly capable of doing).  Modern genetics confirms the validity of the Nuremberg concept, as even quarter-Jews can be genetically distinguished from gentile Europeans.  The bulk of what we know as Jews constitute a reasonably defined ethnic group, and certainly, within that larger grouping, the Ashkenazim, consisting of the vast bulk of those Jews that the Nuremberg laws dealt with, constitute a particularly well defined ethny.  Given the strong correspondence between Jewish identity and Jewish genetics, the Nazi identification of, say, a half-Jew, as someone with two grandparents belonging to the “Jewish religious community,” is actually biologically sound, and far from the “grotesque senselessness” that the scientifically illiterate Ullrich pretends it is.

There are some even more obvious factual errors in the book as well; for example, what to make of September 27, 1939 being described as “several weeks before the beginning of the Second World War” (emphasis added)?

An annoying part of the book is all the sob stories about the “persecution” of the Jews during this pre-WWII period of the Nazi regime. We have the gnashing of the teeth about Kristallnacht, as well as the alleged horrors Jews suffered in Vienna after the Anschluss – university professors made to scrub the streets with their bare hands, or “pious” old Jews made to do “leg squats” in temples while yelling “Heil Hitler!”  But didn’t others have things worse, including ethnies that were the victims of Jewish communist-led genocide?  How many Slavs were slaughtered by the Jews in the Soviet Union?  Was scrubbing the streets or doing deep knee bends worse than millions of Ukrainians being deliberately starved to death in the Holodomor, while grinning Levantines carted off the foodstuffs?   Ullrich doesn’t have the common decency to acknowledge that Nazi “persecution” of Jews was at least in part motivated by the knowledge of what Jewish communists did to Europeans in the USSR, and the fear that they would have done the same in Germany if they had the opportunity. Yes, indeed, I would assume that Ukrainians watching their children die from starvation would have wished they could have got off easy by scrubbing streets and squatting up and down a few times.  But, hey, they were only Slav gentiles, so who cares about them, right?  

Ignoring all of these glaring flaws, the book is fairly well-written and the objective facts buried under the subjective hysteria do shed some light on the Hitler phenomenon, but I came away from this book with a profound disrespect for Ullrich and his “character.”

And Hitler himself?  Saint Adolf was like an individual given a choice of what to do with his money: either put it into prudent, long-term investments; or got to a casino and engage in the most risky forms of high-stakes gambling – and chooses the latter, losing everything.  The money in this case represents the long-term EGI of the German people and of Europeans as a whole, and, also, the money represents the legitimacy of “Far Right” nationalism, particularly fascist thought, and especially the tenets of National Socialism.  Hitler, being the archetype of the Type I “movement” Nutzi and ethnic fetishist, of course took the gambling route, losing all and ruining all; indeed, it is no wonder Saint Adolf is a grand hero and role model for Der Movement, Inc., since the behavioral patterns of he and they are exactly the same.  In summary: Hitler was an idiot.

Advertisements

The Scorpion and the Frog

Europeans are the Frog.  Guess who the Scorpion is.

A summary.

A scorpion asks a frog to carry it across a river. The frog hesitates, afraid of being stung, but the scorpion argues that if it did so, they would both drown. Considering this, the frog agrees, but midway across the river the scorpion does indeed sting the frog, dooming them both. When the frog asks the scorpion why, the scorpion replies that it was in its nature to do so.

Read this – Quinn’s finale on the MacDonald-Cofnas dustup.

See this article from 2010, which is relevant to the questions and criticisms of Quinn.

Ultimately, in a sense, Quinn is correct in that whether the Jews are, or are not, acting on behalf of their own evolutionary group interests is irrelevant from the perspective of the victims of Jewish behavior.  Maybe the Jews hate Whites more than they love themselves.  Maybe the Jews are dooming themselves by their embrace of, and promotion of, the poisons they are using to undermine European survival.  It could be irrational; it could just be their nature, as like the Scorpion in stinging the Frog.  In Mein Kampf Hitler asserted that if the Jews succeeded in destroying Aryans, they would turn on each other next, in hate-filled struggle.  Of course, whether or not the Jews will destroy themselves does not obligate Europeans to allow themselves to be destroyed as well.  For the victim of murder, a murder followed by the suicide of the murderer is not more palatable than murder alone.

Perhaps Europeans should worry more about defending themselves against Jewish behavior rather than worrying whether or not that behavior is, or is not, evolutionarily beneficial to Jews.  We need to shift the focus on us rather than on them.

In Der News, 4/15/18

Some news.

MACA: Make America Cucked Again.

Are the homoerotic fanboys off the Trump Train yet?

I’m sure cuck nagger Roissy will regale us with all sorts of evidence of how Trump is striking against the “Globohomo” regime, by doing such world historical activities such as spewing forth insulting tweets or “negging” an old French cradle-robbing hag. Are all you guys “tired of winning yet?”  More concern about the borders of Syria than the borders of America – did we elect John McAmnesty?

The Yeastbucket Tax

In a fundamental sense, these programs are equivalent to the cuckolding of all tax-paying men. Cuckolding is when a woman has a child by one man but convinces a second that it is his in order to deceptively gain access to his accumulated resources. Men with self-respect and dignity do not pay for the children of other men. Welfare programs are similar except deception is not required because the state acts as the coercive middle man who makes the cuckolding mandatory. It is also less obvious than the personal case because the costs are dispersed among all productive men and they generally never interact with the single mothers directly to see their money being wasted. This wealth, which would be better spent by productive men providing for their own biological children, is forcibly taken from them to pay for women who have made extremely poor personal decisions in their lives and produced children statistically much more likely to be involved in criminal and disorderly behavior. The increased criminality of children of single mothers is a large externality which costs a society a great deal in terms of increasing police and prison spending on top of the direct wealth transfer programs.
The recent introduction of the “affordable” health care act also acts as a wealth transfer from working-age men to women. Men go to the doctor and need medical care much less frequently than women. Before the new health care law, insurers were able to adjust prices based on gender to reflect actual costs. No more. Now men and women cannot be charged differently based on actual medical care use and single men are even required to pay for personal coverage which can only benefit women, such as maternity coverage. The result is that healthcare costs for young men have increased substantially more than for women of all ages. The average increase was 56% for men compared to 4% for women though in specific areas the average increase for young men has been as high as 200%.[vii]  Car insurance shows the opposite pattern where men are made to pay more due to their greater likelihood of getting into catastrophic crashes (women are more likely to have an accident, but those are usually minor). Unsurprisingly, there has been no attempt to enforce “equality” in this situation.

Listen to this. What was the ethnicity of Justice Frankfurter?  HuWhyte.

Brown vs. Board of Education: A Jewish-Negro alliance against White interests.  Curiously, greasy low–IQ Afrowops and hora-dancing Romanians were not players in that fiasco.

How Darwin differed from HBD.  The relevant parts are highlighted:

There is a contradiction between Darwin’s methodology and how he described it for public consumption. Darwin claimed that he proceeded “on true Baconian [inductive] principles and without any theory collected facts on a wholesale scale.” He also wrote, “How odd it is that anyone should not see that all observation must be for or against some view if it is to be of any service!” The scientific method includes 2 episodes. The first consists of formulating hypotheses; the second consists of experimentally testing them. What differentiates science from other knowledge is the second episode: subjecting hypotheses to empirical testing by observing whether or not predictions derived from a hypothesis are the case in relevant observations and experiments. A hypothesis is scientific only if it is consistent with some but not other possible states of affairs not yet observed, so that it is subject to the possibility of falsification by reference to experience. Darwin occupies an exalted place in the history of Western thought, deservedly receiving credit for the theory of evolution. In The Origin of Species, he laid out the evidence demonstrating the evolution of organisms. More important yet is that he discovered natural selection, the process that accounts for the adaptations of organisms and their complexity and diversification. Natural selection and other causal processes of evolution are investigated by formulating and testing hypotheses. Darwin advanced hypotheses in multiple fields, including geology, plant morphology and physiology, psychology, and evolution, and subjected them to severe empirical tests.

The Alt Wrong’s Final Exam

What is their priority?


UPDATE: Israel is now saying it is suspending the agreement, not because of the damage that would be done to the West, but because of internal “right-wing” pressure about allowing half the Africans to remain in Israel.  I will still run the post I have written, because it is relevant given the underlying Israeli/Jewish attitudes.  For example, get this:

Netanyahu named Germany, Italy and Canada as examples of countries that would accept the migrants, though German and Italian officials said they had no knowledge of any such agreement.

Original post:

Readers may be familiar with this news story.

The Far Right has long accused Jews of hypocrisy: while the Tribe pushes for diversity and alien immigration into Western nations, nations, nations thus headed for minority status for the current White majority, Israel is a Jewish national state, with a resistance to the same mass migration of aliens that Jews foist on Whites throughout the globe

Israel’s determination to deport African migrants back to Africa, where they belong, fits into this paradigm.  However, under pressure from the “United Nations” (United Coloreds would be more accurate). Israel’s “right-wing” government has blinked.  However, they are not keeping all their poor, persecuted Africans.  No, sir, only half.  The other half will be dumped on “Western nations” – I’ve read that Canada, Germany, and Italy are possible destinations.

This is quite remarkable.  If Israel does not have the moral courage to take the steps to safeguard their demographic stability, then that is THEIR problem, and one richly deserved given the predominant role Jews have played in undermining Western demographics.  But, no, even in their hour of defeat the Jews strike out at their eternal enemies, the European peoples, using Black Africans as a biological weapon to undermine the racial and cultural basis of the West, while relieving themselves of half their problem.

Could the opposite be done?  Maybe the USA can send half of its “Dreamers” to Israel?  Turnabout is fair play.  But, no, things don’t quite work out that way, do they?

Now, I will give Amren credit for no longer censoring the comments threads of any criticism of Jews, so some commentators there are venting their well-justified rage over this outrage.  But what about those who run that site?  What about its stable of writers, including “Gregory Hood,” heretofore never afraid to express his opinions on controversial matters?

I would think if some other nation would have connived to dump over 16,000 African migrants into Western nations, the Alt Wrongers would be screaming about it for days.  Will they do so about Israel, and do so in a manner that properly expresses the outrage of the whole situation, put into the context of endless Jewish promotion of Western multiracialism and multiculturalism?  Commentaries?  Podcasts?  A statement of principles?  An acknowledgement that this is an act of demographic warfare, consistent with all that has gone before?  Will they finally speak up on this issue?  To clearly demonstrate that their priority is for Europeans and not Jews, for the West and not for Israel?  Will they do this?

Think of it as a final exam.  Not final as in FINAL, but akin to a final exam in a particular class.  There will be other final exams, on other issues, but, today, the question of Jewish hypocrisy on race presents to the Alt Wrong a final exam on that specific issue.

Stay tuned.

In Der Old News

In der news.

Is this some sort of joke:

Furthermore, the Alt-Right remains a very open and meritocratic movement.

Nothing about Der Movement is even faintly meritocratic.

If I recall correctly, “JPod” himself was likened to “looking like a big toe” by the folks at MPC, which is a fairly astute phenotypic comparison.  In all seriousness though, in what way does Gareth Porter’s physical appearance match a “central casting” archetype of a “filthy anti-Semite?”  I have a feeling that this reflects Jewish animus toward phenotypes representative of founding stock Americans, a group Jews have long had an issue with.  Does JPod look like a “filthy anti-Foundite” then?  One straight out of central casting?  I think he does.

An Insight into the Jewish Character

An anecdote.

Some years ago, I was told about a conversation between two female students at an American college, an anecdote which neatly captures the essence of the Jewish character.  One student was of Jewish ancestry, the other of Greek ancestry, and the relevant part of the discussion went like this:

Jewess: “[blabbing endlessly about “the Holocaust” and “persecution” of Jews]”

Greekess: “Yes, I understand, you are right, but other peoples have suffered as well, not only the Jews.”

Jewess: “Why are you such an anti-Semite; why do you hate Jews so much?”

That’s it, perfectly summarizing the pathological navel-gazing ethnic narcissism and self-absorption of Jews – what else can you expect from a group that labels itself “the chosen people” – in all its glory: a single-minded obsession with themselves and a complete lack of genuine empathy for, or even sincere interest in, any other group whatsoever.

One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail

And it’s not only Arabs.  When have Jews expressed any remorse about the millions of Slavs they murdered in the Soviet Union, for example?

Were those Slavs only “supernal refuse?”

Race in the News, 9/20/16

Two idiots.

Jews in the News: Jennifer Rubin attacks “whining” White men, proves my point that hatred of Trump = hatred of Whites.  Hey, can we critique whining Jews? Although the use of “whining” to describe Jews is a bit redundant.

Roissy’s analysis of why elites promote miscegenation would be more digestible if he himself did not have a history of promoting miscegenation, stating that “oil drilling” can boost a White man’s SMV, and bragged about having a Negress lover with a “gravity-defying ass.”