Category: Jews

Odds and Ends, 5/23/20

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.


The elegant John Simon unfortunately passed away last fall.  Simon, of Hungarian descent, seems to have been a good man:

In 1981, an ad in a Hollywood trade appeared accusing Simon of being “racist, anti-Semitic, misogynist, vicious and derisive.” It was signed by 300 artists, apparently upset that Simon’s review of Richard III complained that an actress in the show “should never be cast as anything but an itinerant gefilte fish with a nervous condition.”

Well, as we know, obesity is related to higher covid-19 risk.

Meet Ron Unz.

Born in California, to a Ukrainian-Jewish immigrant, Unz was raised in a Yiddish-speaking household. His mother, Esther-Laio Avrutin, met his father on an airplane heading for Israel. A professor from the Midwest, he later briefly became her lover when visiting her on a few occasions in Los Angeles. She unilaterally decided to have a child with him, but Unz’s father was already married and his wife opened a letter from Avrutin telling him about her pregnancy. She was an anti-war activist, who raised her son as a single mother, but Unz was given his father’s surname and soon moved back to her family’s home after her son’s birth.

What about the dangers of cheap Chinese labor?

Due to the Chinese state confiscating supply chains and ethnic Chinese shipping masks in the West back to the homeland, there were so few disposable masks, especially highly effective N95 respirators, available for purchase by Americans that hospitals were having terrible difficulty sourcing personal protective equipment. Perhaps some authority figures understood the reality and thus intentionally misled the American public to preserve crucial facemasks for healthcare workers.

Of interest.

Over the years, Johnson and Spencer have sparred. A lot of the conflict, according to alt-righters, had to do with personal style.(Spencer became the best-known face of the “frat” style, polo-and-chinos alt-right; Johnson has dispensed with such pretenses.) But the tension between them also underscored an ongoing debate about how best to save America from itself. Johnson was seen as the Socrates of the radical right. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and, before publicly embracing the cause of the white ethnostate, taught at Morehouse College, which is historically black. In Johnson’s view, the far right had to win the war of ideas before it could move on to the “real world” battlefield. That meant books and articles, speaking engagements, conferences, symposia. He had a way of explaining things that made racism and Jew hatred sound like post-structuralism or supply-side economics—something that was once new or avant-garde or even suspect and, over time, acquired a large following.

Spencer was more of a would-be Vladimir Lenin. He also took ideas seriously; he had pursued a Ph.D. at Duke, in intellectual history, before dropping out and moving to D.C. But he was mostly uninterested in ideas divorced from action. He wanted to be in the middle of things. He had pondered a congressional campaign in Montana, where he usually lived. He felt let down by Trump. (“His administration,” Spencer said in an interview, “is not fundamentally different than a [Mitt] Romney administration—or even a Hillary [Clinton] administration. I never expected him to be me. But I expected him to do something.”) The feeling on the alt-right was that Charlottesville had been a disaster because it had left so many members demoralized and fragmented the movement. For Spencer, political outcomes mattered.

Some interesting Twitter comments:

Highbrow Gentleman

@Hibrowgent

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

So disappointing Greg. Stop being so petty.

Aureum

@Aureum_Kolovrat

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

Promoting a #DuggAnon style psyop propaganda from a source with no name is very low ball. 

Please do better. Greg if you disagree with someone then it would be most honorable to debate them instead of smear them with trash like this that sends our spergs down the rabbit hole.

Aureum, you had better watch out, before you’re called “insane” and “indecent.” Debate?  He don’t need no stinkin’ debate!

Well, I’m not optimistic either, for two reasons:

First, the only possible vehicle for complete redemption – racial activism – has been compromised by the incompetent Quota Queen “leadership” and their rank-and-file Nutzi followers, coupled to an inane and “insane” fossilized dogma.

Second, the dominant element among Europeans today is the “high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  While there are – contra the HBD liars – strong elements of pathological altruism in Southern and Eastern Europe, I’ll agree with the HBDers that it is strongest in NW Europe. Having the SJW Herrenvolk captaining the HMS Europa is leading to a bigger disaster than the Titanic.

I was very supportive of Trump during the 2016 election.

Indeed. And, at the same time I was referring to Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” who I endorsed solely because of the chaos he would bring in his wake (which he did).  Who was right? Who was wrong?

I agree, Greg (except for the invention part, see below). The problem is that some of the people you’ve feuded with can say the same about you.


The “invention” accusation is, unfortunately, a new low in “New Right” discourse.  It’s not enough for Johnson to call his critics “insane” and “indecent” – here he implies that some of them may have been “invented by the enemy.” Criticize him and you are – what?  A CIA asset?  A SPLC or ADL agent? A HopeNotHate operative (no, wait, that’s Hermansson)? A reporter for The Stranger (no, wait, that’s Lewis)?  


You see, disagreeing with someone, criticizing their behavior and ideology and actions, holding them accountable – that makes you a “horrible” person. Or an “invention of the enemy.” 


These types, who have an inflated sense of their own self-importance, have to personalize everything. As I’ve repeatedly written here – my criticism of people in the “movement” is business, not personal. I do not know them personally nor do I care to. Who knows? They may be kind to animals (except whales), generous to strangers, pleasant enough in private interactions, real salt of the Earth.  But if these people – particularly self-styled “leaders” – are in my opinion destructive to the cause, I’m going to call them out on it.  It’s “punching right” – which Johnson approves of (at least when he does it to others).  If the behavior is, in my opinion, hypocritical, mendacious, defamatory, etc., then the criticism will be harsh.  But, also, the thing is this – if the criticism is wrong, then refute it.  Ascribing mental illness to people and/or implying they are some sort of infiltrator or agent provocateur is not a refutation, it is merely ad hominem.


And I wish these types were a bit more paranoid about “invented by the enemy” when it came to Patrik Hermansson and Dave Lewis. That would have saved much trouble and embarrassment.  If you cannot identify real infiltrators but instead suggest that authentic activists are such – well, how does that refute my criticisms about your poor judgment?  Indeed, it does nothing but support and reinforce such criticism.  Do better.


Note that I do not make such accusations here at this blog. The closest to that is the endorsement of an investigation – and only an investigation – to determine if any HBDers have association (directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly) with the Chinese government or any other such operatives.  An investigation is just that – a determination about something unknown.  It is wholly possible, and I’ve stated as much, that the HBDers are innocent. Very well. In that case, they should welcome an investigation. The endorsement of an investigation was based upon, in my opinion, credible similarities between (frankly, ludicrous) HBD essays blaming covid-19 on an “American bioweapon” and strikingly similar Chinese government propaganda about same. The suggestion that an investigation was necessary was not simply due to disagreement or feuding, but on those aforementioned similarities and the damage done by that propaganda to the interests of those trying to get to the truth of the matter.


The sad thing is that the people (assuming they themselves are authentic) making accusations against others have actually facilitated the very infiltration they warn about.


An observation from Twitter:

Hard Right Turn@FelineDivisionReplying to @NewRightAmerica 

Your obsession with Spencer is consuming you Greg. Why not just forget about him and do you?

More advice to be downwardly mobile from Counter-Currents:

The first question posed to Greg Johnson and Fróði Midjord during the recent Counter-Currents livestream was, “If you could re-live your twenties, what would you do differently?” Greg’s answer was direct, clear, and quite pertinent to those of us considering an academic career — in the humanities, at least. Short answer: Don’t. Good advice.

Yes, “good advice.” Let dem dere Jews and Asians get the PhDs. You stay in your parents’ basement, reading Counter-Currents (gotta pump up dem page views!), and sending in your hamburger flipper salary money as “D’Nations” to Greg and company. 


How’s that ethnonationalist Brexit thingee working out for you?


No worries, Germany can help Turkey dump them back into Greece.  Yes we can!


Careful, ETs ,those Faroe Islanders are hunting for you!  Avast!  Harpoons to the ready!


Should this book have been entitled Key Retards of the Radical Right?


Johnson:

But you have to draw a line somewhere, and clearly Spencer and Friberg do not belong. They are shallow, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual poseurs.

Thus, the pot calls the kettle black.


The following is borderline libelous:

Those with a more paranoid bent would connect the dots between Friberg being an antifa and police informant and the fact that Teitelbaum is an American Jew and conclude that he is simply an enemy agent being puffed up as a movement mastermind, i.e., controlled opposition.

Of course, people can make all sorts of similar accusations against Johnson or anyone else.  It doesn’t mean the accusations are true…or not. Evidence?  Where is the clear and irrefutable evidence?

Minsc
Posted March 7, 2019 at 10:41 am | Permalink
Jorjani would’ve been a better choice for the section on emerging thinkers that the most of those characters…
Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted March 7, 2019 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Yes, Jorjani would have been a very good choice

Jorjani’s work is, in my opinion pseudoscientific claptrap. “The spectral!” I’m not surprised that Der Movement considers such an intellectual lightweight to be a “key thinker of the radical right.”


Conservatives are not the only ones afraid of free speech.


Here’s an exercise for the reader – name one (just one) prominent Quota Queen who is currently:

A) Fairly evaluating the ideas, paradigms, and critiques discussed at EGI Notes

B) Willing to engage with the “insane” and “indecent” Ted Sallis

C) Not participating in a cordon sanitaire of the Sallis Groupuscule


I’ll make it easy for you – there are none.  Not a single one.  Consider that even an anti-Sallis opponent like Silver believes that the Quota Queens (at least Johnson) should engage, much less more neutral people who undoubtedly agree with Silver’s assessment.


Who’s afraid of free speech, indeed?


Behold Durocher:

Guillaume Durocher says:
I shat a proverbial brick when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

Is the following more accurate? –

I had to be hospitalized for an intractable priapism when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

But, hey, if I label Durocher as a hardcore Nordicist that means that I am, of course, “insane” and “indecent.”  Where would I have ever got that idea from?


By the way, how did De Gaulle’s policy work out?  From looking at current France, it would seem that his underlings must have confused “Nordic” with “Arab and African.” Honest mistake.


A stupid yeastbucket, whose “contributions” to the “movement” are a silly podcast show and making “speeches” at conferences in which she giggles like a small girl caught “playing doctor” with an autistic and retarded boy, unburdens herself thus:

Lana
@LanaLokteff
10h
Pro-vaccine people really get psychotic defending their injections of sketchy substances. Look, knock yourself out and get all the jabs you want for all I care.
“My body my choice” except when..

Replies
Gotham Resistance
@Gothamresist

Replying to
@LanaLokteff
 and
@Tare1935
Never understood that. If they believe in the vaccines and believe they’re protected, why get so triggered if others choose not to

Let’s see. People object to open lies and pseudoscience, which smears the Right as scientifically illiterate, backwards, and alienates intelligent and rational people (and the same bent toward pseudoscience leads to HBD, Nordicism, “traditionalism,” etc.).


Let’s see. When the unvaccinated get unnecessary diseases it puts a strain on the healthcare system.


And most of all – vaccines are not 100% protective (that’s not how biology works), immunity can wane with age, and there are some people who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons (children under age one year for MMR or folks with allergic reactions or whatever).  So, there are always going to be, in a given population, people who – through no fault of their own – will be not protected. However, given herd immunity, the chain of transmission will be stopped before any significant number of such people are infected. To have such herd immunity, all people who can be vaccinated should be; the overwhelming majority of these will be immune. Vaccination is a collective social good. Lowlife trash who refuse to get vaccinated are free riding on the immunity of others without contributing to it.  

If filthy scum like this were prevalent in past decades, we would still have smallpox.  We would still have polio outbreaks and iron lungs.  It is because of them (and immigration) that we still have measles outbreaks.


But, hey, let’s be fair.  Your body your choice.  Our choice too.  You get ill with a disease for which you chose not to be vaccinated against – no medical treatment. If you die, you die. Further – if you spread the disease to someone else who was vaccinated but who was one of the few not immune or someone who legitimately could not be vaccinated or an old person with waning immunity then you are legally on the hook for that.  At minimum – assault and battery.  If they die – homicide.  I’m sure if you kill an infant with your measles, the jury will be quite interested in your anti-vaxx polemics. Your psychosexual sweaty fear of being “jabbed” is worth killing someone, right?


Lana needs to demonstrate to us all the strength of her anti-vaxx convictions.  I suggest the following three-part program:


1. Get bitten by a rabid animal.  Make sure it’s a real good bite, plenty of foaming saliva getting in there.

2. Refuse to get “jabbed” for rabies prevention treatment.  No rabies vaccine and no rabies immune globulin. After all, who knows what questionable substances are in those jabs? Maybe even a dastardly microchip invented by Bill Gates or some sort of toxin implanted by a cackling Jew doctor.  No jabs!

3. Go home to your family and be a loving mother to your children. Plenty of close contact with them in the weeks or months ahead.  It’s all good!  What could possibly go wrong?


And it goes without saying that if your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, you should, of course, refuse to have them “jabbed” as well.  Who knows what that Jew doctor is injecting?


The good news is that the nonsense of the Russess has a limited shelf-life. Once she hits the wall and looks like a babushka, no one will care in the slightest what she has to say. Give it time – perhaps less time than she thinks.  Age marches onward. Let us remember the well known MGTOW adage – when men get older, the look more and more like Sean Connery; when women get older, they look more and more like…Sean Connery.


In any case, those of us with a triple digit IQ and who are not hypocrites understand that in a society individual choices in many cases affect other people.  Indeed, isn’t that why we on the Far Right criticize “my body my choice” race-mixing? Don’t we oppose the idea that people can do whatever they want, even though it is destructive to the wider society?


Indeed, we all have societal responsibilities. The Millennials and Zoomers should reflect upon that the reason why they are not today pricked (not “jabbed”) against smallpox is because all we older people were so pricked, and the virus was eliminated (in the wild). If someone – an incompetent TROPICAL Chinese lab for example – were to release smallpox, would The Retarded Right refuse that vaccine as well?

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.


The elegant John Simon unfortunately passed away last fall.  Simon, of Hungarian descent, seems to have been a good man:

In 1981, an ad in a Hollywood trade appeared accusing Simon of being “racist, anti-Semitic, misogynist, vicious and derisive.” It was signed by 300 artists, apparently upset that Simon’s review of Richard III complained that an actress in the show “should never be cast as anything but an itinerant gefilte fish with a nervous condition.”

Well, as we know, obesity is related to higher covid-19 risk.

Meet Ron Unz.

Born in California, to a Ukrainian-Jewish immigrant, Unz was raised in a Yiddish-speaking household. His mother, Esther-Laio Avrutin, met his father on an airplane heading for Israel. A professor from the Midwest, he later briefly became her lover when visiting her on a few occasions in Los Angeles. She unilaterally decided to have a child with him, but Unz’s father was already married and his wife opened a letter from Avrutin telling him about her pregnancy. She was an anti-war activist, who raised her son as a single mother, but Unz was given his father’s surname and soon moved back to her family’s home after her son’s birth.

What about the dangers of cheap Chinese labor?

Due to the Chinese state confiscating supply chains and ethnic Chinese shipping masks in the West back to the homeland, there were so few disposable masks, especially highly effective N95 respirators, available for purchase by Americans that hospitals were having terrible difficulty sourcing personal protective equipment. Perhaps some authority figures understood the reality and thus intentionally misled the American public to preserve crucial facemasks for healthcare workers.

Of interest.

Over the years, Johnson and Spencer have sparred. A lot of the conflict, according to alt-righters, had to do with personal style.(Spencer became the best-known face of the “frat” style, polo-and-chinos alt-right; Johnson has dispensed with such pretenses.) But the tension between them also underscored an ongoing debate about how best to save America from itself. Johnson was seen as the Socrates of the radical right. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and, before publicly embracing the cause of the white ethnostate, taught at Morehouse College, which is historically black. In Johnson’s view, the far right had to win the war of ideas before it could move on to the “real world” battlefield. That meant books and articles, speaking engagements, conferences, symposia. He had a way of explaining things that made racism and Jew hatred sound like post-structuralism or supply-side economics—something that was once new or avant-garde or even suspect and, over time, acquired a large following.

Spencer was more of a would-be Vladimir Lenin. He also took ideas seriously; he had pursued a Ph.D. at Duke, in intellectual history, before dropping out and moving to D.C. But he was mostly uninterested in ideas divorced from action. He wanted to be in the middle of things. He had pondered a congressional campaign in Montana, where he usually lived. He felt let down by Trump. (“His administration,” Spencer said in an interview, “is not fundamentally different than a [Mitt] Romney administration—or even a Hillary [Clinton] administration. I never expected him to be me. But I expected him to do something.”) The feeling on the alt-right was that Charlottesville had been a disaster because it had left so many members demoralized and fragmented the movement. For Spencer, political outcomes mattered.

Some interesting Twitter comments:

Highbrow Gentleman

@Hibrowgent

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

So disappointing Greg. Stop being so petty.

Aureum

@Aureum_Kolovrat

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

Promoting a #DuggAnon style psyop propaganda from a source with no name is very low ball. 

Please do better. Greg if you disagree with someone then it would be most honorable to debate them instead of smear them with trash like this that sends our spergs down the rabbit hole.

Aureum, you had better watch out, before you’re called “insane” and “indecent.” Debate?  He don’t need no stinkin’ debate!

Well, I’m not optimistic either, for two reasons:

First, the only possible vehicle for complete redemption – racial activism – has been compromised by the incompetent Quota Queen “leadership” and their rank-and-file Nutzi followers, coupled to an inane and “insane” fossilized dogma.

Second, the dominant element among Europeans today is the “high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  While there are – contra the HBD liars – strong elements of pathological altruism in Southern and Eastern Europe, I’ll agree with the HBDers that it is strongest in NW Europe. Having the SJW Herrenvolk captaining the HMS Europa is leading to a bigger disaster than the Titanic.

I was very supportive of Trump during the 2016 election.

Indeed. And, at the same time I was referring to Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” who I endorsed solely because of the chaos he would bring in his wake (which he did).  Who was right? Who was wrong?

I agree, Greg (except for the invention part, see below). The problem is that some of the people you’ve feuded with can say the same about you.


The “invention” accusation is, unfortunately, a new low in “New Right” discourse.  It’s not enough for Johnson to call his critics “insane” and “indecent” – here he implies that some of them may have been “invented by the enemy.” Criticize him and you are – what?  A CIA asset?  A SPLC or ADL agent? A HopeNotHate operative (no, wait, that’s Hermansson)? A reporter for The Stranger (no, wait, that’s Lewis)?  


You see, disagreeing with someone, criticizing their behavior and ideology and actions, holding them accountable – that makes you a “horrible” person. Or an “invention of the enemy.” 


These types, who have an inflated sense of their own self-importance, have to personalize everything. As I’ve repeatedly written here – my criticism of people in the “movement” is business, not personal. I do not know them personally nor do I care to. Who knows? They may be kind to animals (except whales), generous to strangers, pleasant enough in private interactions, real salt of the Earth.  But if these people – particularly self-styled “leaders” – are in my opinion destructive to the cause, I’m going to call them out on it.  It’s “punching right” – which Johnson approves of (at least when he does it to others).  If the behavior is, in my opinion, hypocritical, mendacious, defamatory, etc., then the criticism will be harsh.  But, also, the thing is this – if the criticism is wrong, then refute it.  Ascribing mental illness to people and/or implying they are some sort of infiltrator or agent provocateur is not a refutation, it is merely ad hominem.


And I wish these types were a bit more paranoid about “invented by the enemy” when it came to Patrik Hermansson and Dave Lewis. That would have saved much trouble and embarrassment.  If you cannot identify real infiltrators but instead suggest that authentic activists are such – well, how does that refute my criticisms about your poor judgment?  Indeed, it does nothing but support and reinforce such criticism.  Do better.


Note that I do not make such accusations here at this blog. The closest to that is the endorsement of an investigation – and only an investigation – to determine if any HBDers have association (directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly) with the Chinese government or any other such operatives.  An investigation is just that – a determination about something unknown.  It is wholly possible, and I’ve stated as much, that the HBDers are innocent. Very well. In that case, they should welcome an investigation. The endorsement of an investigation was based upon, in my opinion, credible similarities between (frankly, ludicrous) HBD essays blaming covid-19 on an “American bioweapon” and strikingly similar Chinese government propaganda about same. The suggestion that an investigation was necessary was not simply due to disagreement or feuding, but on those aforementioned similarities and the damage done by that propaganda to the interests of those trying to get to the truth of the matter.


The sad thing is that the people (assuming they themselves are authentic) making accusations against others have actually facilitated the very infiltration they warn about.


An observation from Twitter:

Hard Right Turn@FelineDivisionReplying to @NewRightAmerica 

Your obsession with Spencer is consuming you Greg. Why not just forget about him and do you?

More advice to be downwardly mobile from Counter-Currents:

The first question posed to Greg Johnson and Fróði Midjord during the recent Counter-Currents livestream was, “If you could re-live your twenties, what would you do differently?” Greg’s answer was direct, clear, and quite pertinent to those of us considering an academic career — in the humanities, at least. Short answer: Don’t. Good advice.

Yes, “good advice.” Let dem dere Jews and Asians get the PhDs. You stay in your parents’ basement, reading Counter-Currents (gotta pump up dem page views!), and sending in your hamburger flipper salary money as “D’Nations” to Greg and company. 


How’s that ethnonationalist Brexit thingee working out for you?


No worries, Germany can help Turkey dump them back into Greece.  Yes we can!


Careful, ETs ,those Faroe Islanders are hunting for you!  Avast!  Harpoons to the ready!


Should this book have been entitled Key Retards of the Radical Right?


Johnson:

But you have to draw a line somewhere, and clearly Spencer and Friberg do not belong. They are shallow, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual poseurs.

Thus, the pot calls the kettle black.


The following is borderline libelous:

Those with a more paranoid bent would connect the dots between Friberg being an antifa and police informant and the fact that Teitelbaum is an American Jew and conclude that he is simply an enemy agent being puffed up as a movement mastermind, i.e., controlled opposition.

Of course, people can make all sorts of similar accusations against Johnson or anyone else.  It doesn’t mean the accusations are true…or not. Evidence?  Where is the clear and irrefutable evidence?

Minsc
Posted March 7, 2019 at 10:41 am | Permalink
Jorjani would’ve been a better choice for the section on emerging thinkers that the most of those characters…
Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted March 7, 2019 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Yes, Jorjani would have been a very good choice

Jorjani’s work is, in my opinion pseudoscientific claptrap. “The spectral!” I’m not surprised that Der Movement considers such an intellectual lightweight to be a “key thinker of the radical right.”


Conservatives are not the only ones afraid of free speech.


Here’s an exercise for the reader – name one (just one) prominent Quota Queen who is currently:

A) Fairly evaluating the ideas, paradigms, and critiques discussed at EGI Notes

B) Willing to engage with the “insane” and “indecent” Ted Sallis

C) Not participating in a cordon sanitaire of the Sallis Groupuscule


I’ll make it easy for you – there are none.  Not a single one.  Consider that even an anti-Sallis opponent like Silver believes that the Quota Queens (at least Johnson) should engage, much less more neutral people who undoubtedly agree with Silver’s assessment.


Who’s afraid of free speech, indeed?


Behold Durocher:

Guillaume Durocher says:
I shat a proverbial brick when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

Is the following more accurate? –

I had to be hospitalized for an intractable priapism when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

But, hey, if I label Durocher as a hardcore Nordicist that means that I am, of course, “insane” and “indecent.”  Where would I have ever got that idea from?


By the way, how did De Gaulle’s policy work out?  From looking at current France, it would seem that his underlings must have confused “Nordic” with “Arab and African.” Honest mistake.


A stupid yeastbucket, whose “contributions” to the “movement” are a silly podcast show and making “speeches” at conferences in which she giggles like a small girl caught “playing doctor” with an autistic and retarded boy, unburdens herself thus:

Lana
@LanaLokteff
10h
Pro-vaccine people really get psychotic defending their injections of sketchy substances. Look, knock yourself out and get all the jabs you want for all I care.
“My body my choice” except when..

Replies
Gotham Resistance
@Gothamresist

Replying to
@LanaLokteff
 and
@Tare1935
Never understood that. If they believe in the vaccines and believe they’re protected, why get so triggered if others choose not to

Let’s see. People object to open lies and pseudoscience, which smears the Right as scientifically illiterate, backwards, and alienates intelligent and rational people (and the same bent toward pseudoscience leads to HBD, Nordicism, “traditionalism,” etc.).


Let’s see. When the unvaccinated get unnecessary diseases it puts a strain on the healthcare system.


And most of all – vaccines are not 100% protective (that’s not how biology works), immunity can wane with age, and there are some people who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons (children under age one year for MMR or folks with allergic reactions or whatever).  So, there are always going to be, in a given population, people who – through no fault of their own – will be not protected. However, given herd immunity, the chain of transmission will be stopped before any significant number of such people are infected. To have such herd immunity, all people who can be vaccinated should be; the overwhelming majority of these will be immune. Vaccination is a collective social good. Lowlife trash who refuse to get vaccinated are free riding on the immunity of others without contributing to it.  

If filthy scum like this were prevalent in past decades, we would still have smallpox.  We would still have polio outbreaks and iron lungs.  It is because of them (and immigration) that we still have measles outbreaks.


But, hey, let’s be fair.  Your body your choice.  Our choice too.  You get ill with a disease for which you chose not to be vaccinated against – no medical treatment. If you die, you die. Further – if you spread the disease to someone else who was vaccinated but who was one of the few not immune or someone who legitimately could not be vaccinated or an old person with waning immunity then you are legally on the hook for that.  At minimum – assault and battery.  If they die – homicide.  I’m sure if you kill an infant with your measles, the jury will be quite interested in your anti-vaxx polemics. Your psychosexual sweaty fears of being “jabbed” is worth killing someone, right?


Lana needs to demonstrate to us all the strength of her anti-vaxx convictions.  I suggest the following three-part program:


1. Get bitten by a rabid animal.  Make sure it’s a real good bite, plenty of foaming saliva getting in there.

2. Refuse to get “jabbed” for rabies prevention treatment.  No rabies vaccine and no rabies immune globulin. After all, who knows what questionable substances are in those jabs? Maybe even a dastardly microchip invented by Bill Gates or some sort of toxin implanted by a cackling Jew doctor.  No jabs!

3. Go home to your family and be a loving mother to your children. Plenty of close contact with them in the weeks or months ahead.  It’s all good!  What could possibly go wrong?


And it goes without saying that if your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, you should, of course, refuse to have them “jabbed” as well.  Who knows what that Jew doctor is injecting?


The good news is that the nonsense of the Russess has a limited shelf-life. Once she hits the wall and looks like a babushka, no one will care in the slightest what she has to say. Give it time – perhaps less time than she thinks.  Age marches onward. Let us remember the well known MGTOW adage – when men get older, the look more and more like Sean Connery; when women get older, they look more and more like…Sean Connery.


In any case, those of us with a triple digit IQ and who are not hypocrites understand that in a society individual choices in many cases affect other people.  Indeed, isn’t that why we on the Far Right criticize “my body my choice” race-mixing? Don’t we oppose the idea that people can do whatever they want, even though it is destructive to the wider society?


Indeed, we all have societal responsibilities. The Millennials and Zoomers should reflect upon that the reason why they are not today pricked (not “jabbed”) against smallpox is because all we older people were so pricked, and the virus was eliminated (in the wild). If someone – an incompetent TROPICAL Chinese lab for example – were to release smallpox, would The Retarded Right refuse that vaccine as well?

Odds and Ends, 5/7/20

In der news.

What was the discovery?  How to spread it to Whites more effectively?  Seriously though, one wonders why one Chinese would kill another with this coronavirus connection.  It does make one wonder.

Another Asian beauty!  Awkward squad sweatily murmurs, “hubba hubba.”

Yet another Asian beauty!  The face that launched a thousand vomits.

I mean, can you get any more alien and TROPICAL than that?  That’s part of the pan-colored TROPICAL ALLIANCE against Whites.  Derbyshire weeps.

This is the natural outcome of the anti-White Jewish-Chinese alliance.  The truth has been revealed. Silkers weep.

“Canada is also viewed as a very multicultural space, a safe space,” she said. In the past, many newcomers from India would settle in the Toronto area, but now, there’s “a saturation of too many international students in Ontario” so they’re looking further afield, and attending colleges, as well as universities, to take courses that will lead to work here in Canada.

In other words, the niche space of Ontario is already full of yellow and brown Asiatics, who have depleted that space like a plague of locusts descending on a crop field. Time to move on to fresh pastures!

Who is betraying White interests in Canada? Must be a wop, right?  Looks like a Med!

The comments are the best part of this absurdly biased tweet.  Methinks Duchesne is reading too much MacDonald.  “Important” – the only thing the krauts are “important” for is forcibly spreading multiculturalism in Europe.  If your taint of MacDonaldism is too strong to consider any Southern Europeans as “important” enough, then how about Russia?  Or are they out for being not “Western?’’ I agree with the commentators who aver that if Duchesne’s options are our only choices, then we’re done.  It’s all over.


And that is why I have contempt for Italy and Italians.  They allow themselves to be so airily dismissed, to be considered unimportant in world affairs; worse, they apparently have so little dignity and pride that it does not bother them that they are held to no account.  And that is why it is unfair to criticize, much less mock, Cola di Rienzi and Benito Mussolini for their failures.  At least they tried.  What could they do, given the abysmal human material they had to work with? 


As regards any progress from today’s Italy, one can only hope that Milady Meloni has the “balls” that Italian “males” so obviously lack. The “males” can sing from balconies…in soprano.

To better understand why the Alt Right collapsed, the following are the chapters, in the Sedgwick book, on “emergent thinkers (sic)” on the Far Right:

art III Emergent Thinkers

12 Mencius Moldbug and Neoreaction

13 Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents

14 Richard B. Spencer and the Alt Right

15 Jack Donovan and Male Tribalism

16 Daniel Friberg and Metapolitics in Action

And there you go….a Jew, a mendacious gaslighting Quota Queen grifter, The Master of Disaster, a homosexual, and a Swede once allied with the Spencer faction (albeit I know little about Friberg and as of today have no “beef” with him).

After reading this, I have the following to say. HBDers support Jews and support Israel.  HBDers literally worship Jews the same as they worship East Asians.  HBD is the enemy.  What will YOU do to oppose HBD?

Anthropological note: Has anyone else ever noticed that East Asians typically have long and thin fingernail nail beds (I presume the feet are the same – maybe some awkward squader can inform us about that after they get up from some measured groveling)?  That contrasts to the shorter and broader nail beds of Europeans (and West Eurasians in general). Interestingly, watching a YouTube video, I noticed that a (predominantly) Amerind “Hispanic” also had long thin nail beds, suggesting a general racial characteristic pre-dating the East Asian/Amerind split (assuming these anecdotal data are reflective of the broader reality).  What the adaptive value of this may be, I do not know.

The other shoe drops?  I suppose Johnson realizes his ethnonationalist shtick is not truly compatible with White nationalism, so the latter must be bashed.  Hey Greg, the problem is with Der Movement (including you), not with “White nationalism.”

That “traumatic” start to the sex life, I suppose.

Behold a Piece of Filth

Ethnoimperialist trash.

Greg Johnson is an utter piece of filth, an enemy of Europe, lowlife trash, a gaslighting liar, a promoter of  anti-White HBD, and a despicable hypocrite.  His vision of “ethnonationalism” – in his own words – includes war and ethnic cleansing between Europeans. If you look at his associates, at the material he runs at his site, you can observe that he promotes de facto ethnoimperialism – that is, Northwest Europeans get to have their own sovereign states, but Southern and Eastern European nations have to be flop houses, crash pads, and bordellos for WASP and Germanic expats who go where they please, live where they please, screw who they please, and colonize where they please.  Hypocrites.

His definition of “White nationalism” is ludicrous.  Why have a separate term of “White nationalism” at all?  Why not simply an English nationalism, a French nationalism, a German nationalism, an Italian nationalism, each on its own, without any need for an overarching description needed to tie them together?  The term “White nationalism” – for everyone except ethnoimperialist liars – is summarized by ORION (Our Race Is Our Nation), championed by WNs long before trash like Johnson got into the “scene.”  The concept, the whole idea behind that phrase – which has been championed even by people like Strom – is the concept underlying White nationalism as understood by real White nationalists: That of a national identity build first and foremost, predominantly, upon race, with other identities secondary.  The primary allegiance, the primary identity, the primary vision of peoplehood, is racial, not ethnic. Similarly, German nationalism subsumes Prussian, Bavarian, and Saxon et al. identities – perhaps a pre-Bismarckian kraut would have viewed a “German nation” to be an impossibility as well, eh? 

Indeed, saying that “White nationalism” understood in that way is impossible because “Whites have never been a nation” is copying leftist talking points.  What stupidity.  Hey, an all-White America never existed.  There were Negroes and Amerindians on this territory from the beginning.  So, it’s impossible!  Moron.  Hypocrite.  Gaslighting liar and grifting fraud.

Gaslighting liar.  The ultimate cause of WWI – as everyone other than ethnoimperialist liars like Johnson understands – was the national rivalries between European nations, particularly the competition between a fading UK and a rising Germany, with French revanchism and fears and Russian ambitions playing their part.  The moribund Austro-Hungarian “Empire” and their monarchy was just an excuse. 

Can you trust Johnson’s judgment on any of this, when he has been wrong about just about everything, for years, as chronicled in detail at this blog? The hero of The Pilleater Chronicles, of multiple infiltrations, of endless feuds, of tin cup grifting.  The archetype, the paragon, of Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program; if this freak had been a wop or hunkie, or even a mick, he would have been allowed to disappear into well-earned obscurity long ago.  But the sweaty fetishists of Der Movement keep on propping up this intellectually vapid no account fraud, as they do to his equally inept and vacuous rival, The Master of Disaster, Richard Spencer.  

Of course, we must understand that Johnson is not really a true ethnonationalist, but is instead an ethnoimperialist. If we assume he’s “sincere,” and not doing a job for the enemies of the White race, then he likely wants to divide Europe so as to empower his Herrenvolk ethnoimperialist elite.  We got to have the John Morgans using Hungary as a crash pad, the Full Moon Ancestries using Eastern Europe as a bordello, and the Johnsons skipping from nation to nation as the Wandering WASP.  His ethnonationalism is the mirror image of the EU, which is nothing more than naked German domination, Johnsonian “ethnonationalism” is summed up by the motto “sovereignty for me, subservience to thee.” Or is he going to convince his lapdog Morgan to stop parasitizing off of Hungarian living space?  Are his writers going to stop being Nordic versions of Roosh – “bang East Europe?”  Ah, no. Ethnonationalism is not for those “low types” of the South and East don’t you know, the racial aristocrats turn up their noses at the peons of Southern and Eastern Europe.

More on this issue:

And, laughably, this is my argument on his own blog – back before Johnson’s crazed obsession with Richard Spencer got the better of him and he decided to attack pan-Europeanism as part of some petty catty spite.

EGI Notes has been in error for not taking the Johnson threat to White nationalism seriously enough.  I apologize for this oversight and will make an attempt to correct it.  As Johnson seems to be the primary internal, faux-intellectual threat to White nationalism, as WNs have traditionally perceived it, he will need to be a subject of increased scrutiny.

I have been warning all of you of the threat posed by the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, and we can observe that they are making a concerted effort to ruin the possibility of an authentic pan-European cooperation among Whites. Interesting – but not surprising given that they are gaslighting liars – they invert the truth of the underlying issues here. They pretend that they are the champions of national sovereignty and the pan-Europeanists are all oppressive empire builders, smothering national identities.  In point of fact – objective fact if you observe their actual behavior – they champion ethnoimperialist oppression, while pan-Europeanists champion a voluntary coming together of European peoples to advance their group interests.

In my pan-European view, for example, Hungary can forever be Hungary and, while part of a pan-European Confederation, will maintain its right of ethnic homogeneity and domestic sovereignty. In Johnson’s ethnoimperialist “ethnonationalism,” Hungary is a de jure sovereign state, but de facto it is nothing more than John Morgan’s crash pad and a bordello for the likes of Full Moon Ancestry and Anton.  Make way Magyars for your racial superiors!  You are “sovereign” but if a British/Saxon wants your apartment he takes it, and if a Dane wants your woman, he takes her. Move over, you hora-dancing Romanians, the Anglo Munro wants your land and your women. Move over, Italians, Farrell wants your women, injecting himself into your gene pool.  Move over Spaniards and Bulgarians, British expats want to colonize your nations.  Ethnonationalism!  Sovereignty!  But, alas, not for the likes of you.  Instead, it are the pan-Europeanists who will give you your national freedom.  It’s the pan-Europeanists who will give Hungarians the right to rid themselves of unwanted invaders like Morgan.

Real leaders, men of vision, provide direction to the masses instead of following the masses and accommodating all of their pettiness and their tendencies toward the narcissism of small differences.  Leaders with vision are men of great thoughts and great deeds, not those who preach to us the atomization of a Europe in which we all will hide “snug in our hobbit holes.”  Of course, leaders need to keep in mind what is possible.  However, since the nations of Europe voluntarily formed and joined the EU (and today only object to its intrusive and SJW implementation by the “high trust northern hunter gatherers” who are the dominant force within it) I fail to see how a pan-European Confederation is “impossible.”  In fact, it is ethnonationalism that is impossible, as demonstrated by the fact that its most vocal promoters are unable to practice its tenets in their own private lives, instead stampeding over Southern and Eastern Europe like the worst sort of Brussels bureaucrats. Further, lacking any intellectual basis of their own beliefs, they have to, laughably, identify with Francis Parker Yockey, a man who would despise them and all they stand for, and term them “culture retarders” and “Michels.”

And why does Counter-Currents promote the idea of “Intermarium” if single nation ethnonationalism is so grand?  What?  Do we need a single Eastern European neck for the Anglo-Germanic leash?  Bark, Slavs and Magyars, bark, roll over, and play dead – your WASP, Saxon, and Danish masters are here.  And hand over your women (or your teen-aged boy toys, as the case may be).

Sure, Greggy, let’s not blame China.  I guess the HBD part of your alliance has the most “juice,” eh?  Or is your push for European atomization not only to enable ethnoimperialism among Anglo-Nordic-Germanic elites, but also to empower China’s rise to dominance? As I’ve said, any White who writes for Unz is a despicable race traitor.  Is any of this surprising then?  Is Greg Johnson one of the White race’s predominant foes?

At this point, let us examine the various components of the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, and the motivations of each faction for opposing pan-Europeanism.

The HBDers have as their objective creating a racial caste system with unmixed Jews and East Asians (and higher IQ South Asians) at the top (the “Inner Party”), a mongrelized Jeurasian (Jews, Asians, and higher-IQ [mostly “Nordic”] Whites race-mixed together) middle group (the “Outer Party”) and subaltern Whites as a helot class (the “Proles”) – perhaps with those Whites mixing with Blacks and Hispanics (Redblex).  Indeed, this is HBDer Sailer as quoted at the pro-Asian, anti-White HBD GNXP site:

It’s interesting to speculate on the future of intermarriage in America. Marriages are increasingly likely to be between people of different ethnic groups but of similar IQ’s, and there’s no reason to assume this trend will stop. America’s obsession with sending everybody to college means that young people get sorted by SAT score (i.e., IQ) when they’re at their most romantic. Therefore, it’s quite possible that the top dogs in America will in future generations look different than they do now, but they probably won’t look much like the future underdogs, either. If we were to halt immigration now, continuing intermarriage along IQ lines might in many generations lead to the country being run by an IQ overclass of mostly “Jeurasians” (i.e., a genetic blend of the smarter European gentiles, Jews, East Asians, South Asians, Armenians, and possibly other Middle Easterners). In contrast, the lower ranks might consist largely of “Redblex”: a rather lumpy partial blend of redneck whites, blacks, and Mexicans.

That’s the HBDers who wrote that, not me.  That’s not “paranoid ideation” on my part.  That’s their own words, with the boys at GNXP being very excited about that possibility.

To achieve this goal, obviously there must be no White solidarity, no pan-Europeanism standing opposed to Jews, Asians, and other non-Whites, and no kin-based racialism opposed to miscegenation, but instead an aracial “cognitive elitism” and a lack of a distinct race-based White consciousness.

The Nordicists are motivated by their intense hatred toward non-Nordic Europeans, with Southern Europeans being enemy number one and Eastern Europeans as enemy number two. They despise non-Nordic Whites far more than they do non-Whites, eagerly grasping onto the latter to oppose the former. Hence, Nordicists would join GNXP comments threads to support the Brownster anti-pan-European agendas, and leading Nordicists would defend the Chinese against charges of cannibalism (charges proven correct; e.g., as political retribution during the Cultural Revolution – eating “class enemies”).

The Ethnonationalists are motivated to oppose pan-Europeanism since they want an atomized Europe, prey to Anglo-Nordic-Germanic ethnoimperialists, so that Southern and Eastern Europe can be exploited and colonized by self-styled “racial aristocrats” and their neo-feudalism, with Saxons making Budapest into a “crash pad,” Danes using the Ukraine and Poland as their bordello, and elitist Anglos gallivanting across Europe with young gay partners in tow (as well as having an international assortment of men’s rooms to harass innocent folks in).

The gaslighters will of course rant about “paranoid ideation” (since the truth hits too close to home), but let us be clear here. I am NOT talking about some sort of tightly knit, highly organized conspiracy, with all the parties gathering together like the Elders of Zion, hatching their plots, while cackling and rubbing their hands together. Instead, I view this as a more loosely knit confluence of interests among groups that otherwise are in opposing in other matters, but are so hysterically anti-pan-European that these other matters take a back seat to cooperation against what they perceive as the biggest threat to their common interests.

HBD Gods threaten America.  HBDers are de facto traitors; an investigation is required to determine whether they are de jure traitors as well.

This must be the first step in the Black Man’s demographic conquest of China.  Black Man- China is your promised land!  Migrate there in the hundreds of millions – Africa’s excess population has a home in the tropical land of China.

Der Movement continues to humiliate itself.  How’s that affirmative action program working out for you guys?

Confused? If you ignore the labels, however, the two parties are pretty much what they have always been-a southern-Catholic coalition against a Yankee-black coalition, enlarged by Germanic and Jewish Americans.

Outsiders frequently think of Boston in terms of its student population, its lively downtown and the Yankee traditions of Beacon Hill, but it is in reality a city of working‐class neighborhoods, many of them closeknit ethnic Irish or Italian enclaves where Mr. Wallace did exceedingly well.

Wallace, a mostly Southern-oriented candidate, came in a distant third, with 5.29%. He did best in suburban and exurban counties around New York, and reached double figures in some wholly Italian-American precincts.

But, let’s talk about the “racially Nordic Catholic Weyrich.”  

More May Odds and Ends

In der news.

Behold the genocidal lunatic race.

U.S. intelligence officials believe that the Chinese government misled the rest of the world about the contagiousness of COVID-19, all the while taking dramatic action to collect the medical supplies needed for its own battle against the virus, according to an analysis obtained by ABC News.
The report from the Department of Homeland Security claims that “the Chinese government intentionally concealed the severity of COVID-19 from the international community in early January while it stockpiled medical supplies by both increasing imports and decreasing exports.”
“China likely cut its exports of medical supplies prior to its January WHO notification that COVID-19 is a contagion,” according to the report, which was shared with law enforcement and government agencies on Friday.
The analysis looked at official and media reporting of imports and exports, and it examined alternative theories that might explain the dramatic January shift in trade patterns connected with critical health care equipment. However, none of those alternatives seemed plausible to U.S. intelligence experts, who wrote in the report: “The Chinese government attempted to hide its actions by denying there were export restrictions and obfuscating and delaying provision of its trade data.”

China has been waging a remorseless war of genocidal extermination against humanity. Humanity does nothing in response.  China has declared de facto war against America and Europe.  America and Europe do nothing.  HBDers side with China against the White race.  Der Movement embraces HBD.

Draw your own conclusions from all of that.

Another murderous Asian invader.  Question – did Asians intentionally release these insects on the United States as a form of biological warfare?

Asia, Asia…the curse on humanity.  What will YOU do to oppose the Asian menace?

The retarded Right on display again.  And here is why Johnson ranks among those discredited by the coronavirus crisis – his moderated blog gleefully gives a forum to deranged anti-vaxxers, objectively demented trash who claim that viruses don’t cause disease but, at the same time, all non-human animal life on Earth (including, you know, everything from rotifers to sperm whales) are going to be completely wiped out soon by “bullets flying everywhere.”

Ignore that guy running down the street, firing his gun – he’s hunting tardigrades!  Gotta eat meat!  Maybe those bullets will fly into some murder hornets, who knows?

Online comment from Zerohedge (spelling corrected):

Wow. What a surprise.
Chinks lied – you know, the wonderful people who brought all those other viruses, plant blights, and invasive animal and plant species. Those rat-like creatures who sold us shoddy goods for generations, poison baby formula, toothpaste, and kid’s toys. The ones who flood our colleges with droid like, empty people, steal our industrial and scientific research, and make shoddy, garbage quality clones our original products.
There’s a reason they are known as the Jews of the orient.

Excellent.  Excellent.  Derbyshire weeps.

This is true (from Counter-Currents):

GMT
Posted April 30, 2020 at 2:58 pm | Permalink
The fact that Jews like to insert themselves between Europeans and European culture matches everything we know about them. I don’t care how well they play violin, or piano, or if “Rosen and Smith, 1977” marginally advances lung cancer research. I just want some peace and quiet from the neverending onslaught they’ve unleashed on every aspect of my society.

If Jews wanted to be judged as individuals, they should have earned that right by dissenting from the malice their elites are responsible for. They have not done so in any significant numbers.

But, the followings is also true.

The fact that Asians like to insert themselves between Europeans and European STEM matches everything we know about them. I don’t care how “well “they invent data or sloppily perform experiments, or if “Ching and Chong, 2020” marginally advances lung cancer research. I just want some peace and quiet from the neverending onslaught they’ve unleashed on every aspect of my society.

If Asians wanted to be judged as individuals, they should have earned that right by dissenting from the malice their elites are responsible for. They have not done so in any significant numbers.

Funny, how Der Movement is so hesitant to say that.  But, alas, that would offend the HBD/race realist faction and we somehow have to keep the alliance going.

Milady Alert!   Greek men fight to keep out migrant invaders, while Greek women make other contributions.  We all do what can within the limits of our innate skills and biological capabilities!

Speaking of Greek men doing good, please watch this.  Very likely, that is a very accurate description of the Chinese reproductive process.  After all, we are talking here about a hominid species that is the most unlike Whites; indeed, one can effectively argue that East Asians, exemplified by the Chinese, are an order of magnitude more different from Europeans than are sub-Saharan Africans.  Derbyshire weeps.

So, Bjornsson and Hall are going to have a boxing match.  Who will Der Movement root for?  Oh the agony!  Solution – both gentlemen will team up to track down and beat up Lou Ferrigno, that five foot tall Eyetalian dwarf. That’s the ticket!

Cue Der Movement saying that “the Mountain” “looks Med” and has “Italian DNA.”   Is this Daddy?  Only joking.  “Movement” fetishism is an easy target for mocking ridicule, as easy as shooting fish in a barrell.

Odds and Ends, 4/21/20

In der news.

Time to beg the monsters to release their faulty medical supplies. It’s a lose-lose situation for a stupid America that outsourced its entire productive economy. Thanks globalism!

Der Right marches on.  Blaming Jews for things they have not done undermines attempts to held Jews accountable for the things they have done and are doing. But we cannot expect The Retard Right to understand that.  Even the simplest of concepts escape them.

Watch this.  Yes, indeed, you should remember those people who lied to you (HBDers) as well as those who spoke the truth when it was unfashionable to do so (EGI Notes).

EGI Notes openly calls for the US federal government (FBI, Department of Justice) to investigate leading American HBDers for violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) as well as open a treason investigation against those same HBDers.

Read this. If Der Movement had authentic leadership, rather than comically inept Quota Queen grifters, there would be high level strategic planning on how to leverage each of those possibilities. Instead, we get “flubro“” retardation, conspiracy theories about Bill Gates and microchipped vaccines, and an “economy uber alles” attitude.  Even worse, instead of leveraging this crisis to foment anti-Asian hostility and an “us against them” feeling of White solidarity, we get pathetic Alt Righters and pegged HBDers shilling for China and attenuating the righteous anger of humanity against the bizarre aliens.

As I’ve written, The China Plague is mutating, and will continue to mutate. The unanswered question is whether the mitigation efforts, by inhibiting transmission, are selecting for decreased virulence.  See this.

Tucker Carlson is right about this.  Just because The China Plague is a real threat doesn’t mean that the System isn’t exploiting it for their benefit, unlike Der Right and Der Movement, which are self-destructing.

Two Heretical Evolutionary Thoughts

Food for thought.

Drug resistance mediated by clonal evolution is arguably the biggest problem in cancer therapy today. However, evolving resistance to one drug may come at a cost of decreased growth rate or increased sensitivity to another drug due to evolutionary trade-offs. This weakness can be exploited in the clinic using an approach called ‘evolutionary herding’ that aims at controlling the tumour cell population to delay or prevent resistance.

One can imagine a human population that develops certain mental, physical, and/or cultural traits that enable them to survive certain types of environmental challenges – including sociopolitical and cultural challenges – but makes them more vulnerable to another type of challenge. Is this analogous to the pathological altruism of certain (“high trust northern hunter gatherer”) European strains, originally adapted to ancient environmentally challenging yet demographically homogeneous conditions, in today’s multiracial and multicultural societal niches?  Alternatively, have today’s Western societies created a strain of Jew (or other non-European minority) adapted to the current System, but that has sensitivity to another sociopolitical System due to “evolutionary trade-offs?” By analogy, was the vulnerability of Jews to the National Socialist regime an example of “evolutionary herding” of Jews to the more Jew-friendly conditions of Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment secular-liberal Europe?

Researchers administer low levels of a drug, enough to kill most, but not all, of the vulnerable cells in the tumor population while favoring the survival of drug-resistant lineages. Once the tumor has shrunk, clinicians stop administering the drug. The drug-sensitive cells, which tend to have a competitive edge over cells that have invested in a costly drug-resistance mechanism, can now begin to grow back. Competition between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells for resources in the tumor microenvironment keeps the tumor size in check.

Thus, cycling between “treatment on” and “treatment” off strategies can be of use.  First, you kill off most, but not all, of the drug-sensitive cancer cells, leaving mostly resistant cells. Then you remove the drug, and let the remaining sensitive cells grow back, crowding out the resistant cells via resource competition – under “no drug” conditions the sensitive cells have a growth advantage. Then hit with the drug again, etc.

Let’s take Bowery’s concept of “Jewish virulence” and expand it to this concept. What if more extreme anti-Semitism selects for a more virulent strain of Jew, but one that comes with costs – the same mental and physical traits allowing them to survive extreme anti-Semitism (misanthropy, paranoia, excessive ethnocentrism, and who know what else – perhaps better crypsis and/or greater mobility) makes those same Jews less competitive under conditions of lesser anti-Semitism. Thus, under conditions in which the Jewish infection (or neoplastic growth) cannot be eliminated in a Western society, alternating between greater and lesser levels of anti-Semitism could maintain sufficient numbers of vulnerable Jews so as to prevent the permanent establishment of a fully resistant Jewish strain, and thus keep the infestation under control.

Human Symbiosis

What can we say about symbiosis in human interactions?

Symbiosis (from Greek συμβίωσις “living together”, from σύν “together” and βίωσις “living”)[2] is any type of a close and long-term biological interaction between two different biological organisms, be it mutualistic, commensalistic, or parasitic. The organisms, each termed a symbiont, may be of the same or of different species.

Let’s consider some aspects of symbiosis in human interactions, with an emphasis on inter-ethny relations.  This is not meant to be a comprehensive or final determination but merely an introduction, so these paradigms can be applied in future discussions when and where appropriate.

From the standpoint of gross EGI – looking at ethnic genetic interests without doing a full “balancing of the books” with respect to all the costs and benefits that determine the final outcome of adaptive fitness – then the presence of any genetically distinct minority group (no matter how small the genetic distance to the majority group) within a majoritarian state will exhibit parasitism, or at least amensalism, with respect to the majority group. The majority group is always harmed by the presence of the minority group with respect to gross EGI because the fixed carrying capacity of the territory reduces the final number of majority members that can fill that niche space, due to the presence of the minority group. This is akin to Yockey’s “Culture Parasitism” in which the parasitic group (in Yockey’s thesis, the outgroup is defined in terms of culture rather than genetics) reduces the numbers of the host High Culture majority group.  If the parasitic group benefits (as is usual) from living in the territory of the majority group that is parasitism; if there is no benefit, it is amensalism. The majority is harmed in all cases.  If the majority fights back, then we have competition, which can be harmful to both sides.

This conflict can end once assimilation of the minority group takes place; the minority becomes part of the majority so that symbiosis per se is not relevant.  However, the genetic costs to the majority of assimilating the minority is harmful to the EGI of the original majority stock (and is of course harmful to that of the minority stock). Once assimilation is complete however, we have a new people with its own set of genetic (and other) interests.

What about net EGI – the final, adaptive fitness outcome when the “balancing of the books” is complete – as well as proximate interests?  We can consider the various types of symbiosis.

Mutualism – both groups benefit.  For groups living in different polities it is possible – there can be alliances, cultural or economic exchanges, many possible types of mutualistic interactions, particularly between relatively closely related groups. For groups living in the same polity, this becomes more problematic.  One can envision two relatively similar groups supporting each other in competition with more alien competing outgroups – and this alliance become more tenable when the closely related allied groups are undergoing inter-marriage and assimilation. The various European ethnic groups in America are an example of this. Of course, this imposes costs on gross EGI; however, it may, dependent upon context, boost net EGI, if the benefits of the alliance – e.g., outcompeting the more genetically and culturally alien outgroups – outweigh the genetic costs in diluting a more concentrated EGI.

Commensalism – one group benefits while the other is neither harmed nor helped. Commensalism is common in individual or small scale human interactions.  Person A throws out some garbage, while person B finds that garbage useful and derives benefit from it. B is helped, while A is neither helped nor harmed.  It is difficult to think of examples – even when disregarding gross EGI – where larger scale human interactions within the same territory are truly commensal.  Perhaps, interactions between different separate nations can be commensal – the byproducts (even memetic) of one nation/people/ethny benefit another and the originator of the product is neither helped nor harmed.  But if both groups are residing in the same niche space, truly authentic examples of commensalism would be relatively rare.  Usually there are at least some benefits or harms, even if relatively marginal, to one group in contrast to the more obvious benefit enjoyed by another group. Unfortunately, many human interactions in the same niche space is zero sum game – parasitism, predation, and competition will be more common than commensalism. Given the relatively rarity of a true lack of effects on large groups, mutualism will be more common than commensalism as well.

Parasitism – one group benefits while harming the other group is harmed. The classic example is of Jews living in White nations, with the Jews benefiting and the Whites being harmed. This has been such a constant paradigm throughout history that a Wikipedia article has been made on it.  Of course, in some cases, Jewish parasitism descends into predation and/or if the afflicted host peoples fight back, competition.

Bowery’s ideas about extended phenotypes in human groups – as an extension of some of Dawkins’ work – are relevant here. One group controls the behavior of a second group so that the former benefits and the latter are harmed; here the second group acts as the extended phenotype of the first.  Jews controlling the societal milieu so as to modify White gentile behavior for Jewish benefit (and White harm) comes to mind; thus, White gentiles often become the extended phenotypes of Jews. The Whites are unable to control their own behavior and behave self-destructively to serve Jewish interests.

Are White HBDers the extended phenotypes of Jews and Asians, particularly East Asians?  Were “White ethnic” members of the National Alliance the extended phenotype of William Pierce? 

Free-riding also comes into play here. When one group benefits from collective social goods to which they do not contribute, they benefit while the contributing groups are often harmed, since they carry the burden of contributing not only for themselves but for the non-contributing group. That is parasitism.

Predation – one group openly attacks and destroys the other.  For example, considering the role Jews play in America controlling sociopolitical systems to benefit themselves at the expense of Whites, that can be considered parasitism; however, considering Jews in the Soviet Union killing millions of Slavs, that is predation. The criminal attacks of Coloreds against Whites in multiracial nations is also predation, although of course parasitism is another key feature of Colored-White relations (typically, Coloreds benefit while Whites are harmed, although Negro slavery can be an example of the reverse). Race replacement, displacement, and White flight are examples of parasitism moving into predation, with undertones of competition when, rarely, Whites resist.

Neutralism – no effects for either group. Neutralism is possible between peoples living in separate nations, but for people living in the same territory, neutralism is extremely unlikely. There will be some types of positive and negative effects for either or both groups. There may be limited examples of very closely related groups living in the same polity that can have, in certain contexts and for certain periods of time, neutralistic relations, but that is rare.  More distant groups are unlikely to be neutralistic, even when disregarding gross EGI, because the differences between them will always manifest in proximate frictions that affect net EGI.

Amensalism – one group suffers no benefit or harm, but the other group is harmed.  Like commensalism, this is expected to be rare, since it is unlikely that the harm to one group in a polity would not benefit another. Perhaps there can be examples with relatively closely related groups.  If the groups are in separate nations it can be possible that the activities of one harms the other without benefiting the one causing the harm.  Symbiosis in which both groups are affected in some way would be more common than that in which one or both groups are not affected at all.

Competition – both groups are harmed. Competition is considered harmful to both sides, and often this is the case, at least until one side emerges victorious (if such occurs), after which the relationship may change (to, e.g., assimilation, parasitism, etc.).  

Both Yockey and MacDonald have written that the reaction against an intrusive group, even when necessary, can harm the group resisting.  If I recall, Yockey invoked the analogy of a fever, which, while helpful in combating the invasive pathogen, also harms, at least in the short run, the invaded host.

On the other hand, one can think of situations where, in the long term, competition could be beneficial to one or both sides even in the absence of a “final victory.”  Some would say one reason why Europe had so many advancements was the competition between different European nations – a completion that forced and fostered a constant “arms race” of competitive advantages – as opposed of a centralized massive Chinese state lacking in the dynamism of such constant internal turmoil. Of course, today, the level of competition is global, so the same dynamism could be provoked by a confederation of Europe vs. China.  

However, if one defines competition as something which is inherently harmful to both sides, then a situation in which competition is beneficial to one side but not the other would be, for example, parasitism and if beneficial to both sides, mutualism.  

The problem in putting predation into the completion category in that sense is that one could argue that predation benefits the predator (although there are risks in predation, sometimes the prey can kill the predator). One could argue that natural selection from predators improves the prey – mutualism?  It’s complicated.

It is of course possible for the types of symbiosis to change over time (e.g., from parasitism to predation). In heterosexual relationships, particularly marriage, the typical trajectory is that the relationship starts out as mutualism (both sides benefit) then transitions to commensalism (female benefits, male is neutral), and then ends up as parasitism (female benefits, male is harmed).  If the marriage ends up in divorce, female parasitism on the male can become extreme, even moving into predation. Note than even during the mutualism phase, the male can be considered as the extended phenotype of the female, with male behavior controlled through sexual exploitation. Also see this. The man is hormonally domesticated so as to be exploited by the woman in marriage.

Ultimately, the woman is to the man as the Jew is to the gentile.

What is observed in marriage can apply on a broader scale to relations between ethnies.