Category: Jews

More on the Sino-Zionist Alliance

Anti-Silker truth.

While the Silkers use yellow fever fetishism and knee-jerk anti-Semitic rhetoric to push their Asian imperialist agenda, the real geopolitical fact on the ground is the growing cohesion between China and Israel, the growing convergence between Jewish/Zionist interests and ruthless Asian expansionism.

Sino-Zionist collaboration is nothing new, and Bolton’s article outlines the long history of close ties between Jews and the Chinese.

Indeed, we can ask: is the superficial anti-Semitism of Silk Road White nationalism meant to distract gullible Whites from the growing Jewish-Asian alliance against White interests? After all, many “anti-Semitic hate incidents” are manufactured by Jews themselves; therefore, why not use crude anti-Semitic language to have deep state operatives infiltrate White nationalism to subvert its direction for the interests of Sino-Zionist collaborationists?

The Silkers also display their fundamental dishonesty by portraying the current nationalist divide as one between themselves and the juvenile jackasses of the Trump-worshipping Alt Right. There’s a third player in the game: non-Alt Right White nationalists who are unalterably opposed to the Silker agenda and who also are opposed to Fat Don and his cohort of lick-spittle Alt Right fanboys. In fact, except when Silkers crash Alt Right comments threads, the Alt Righters completely ignore the Silker faction. Consistent opposition to Silkism comes from a different direction.  

DNA Testing and Jewish Sophistry

DNA tests.

For example, I’ve come out 95 percent Ashkenazi Jewish (not a geographical population, but a gene pool with its own minor genetic idiosyncrasies due to history) and 5 percent Korean.

There are two major points to derive from this, both that I have discussed before (and labeled as “sophistry” by a Mexican lunatic).

First, as I’ve said before, these commercial tests irresponsibly assert imply a level of accuracy that they really don’t have, specifically for minor “admixture.”  And Der Movement, full of Nutzis and nitwits who do not understand the fine points of DNA testing, are equally irresponsible in believing that, for example, a Finn who tests as “100% European” is meaningfully different from another Finn who is “99% European and 1% Asian” (the former being a pureblood and the latter a mongrel – even if the two are brothers).

It was not clear exactly what tests Marks took (assuming he is truthful about his experience), but we can assume that he is not “5% Korean.”  That 5% could reflect some degree of deep Asian ancestry in the Ashkenazi genepool OR it could just be statistical noise (dependent on the test) OR it could be (as it often happens) dependent on the parental populations chosen to designate “pure” groups – an artifact of genetic distance of populations, or subgroups of populations, from those groups chosen to genetically calibrate group identity.

It is very possible to explain the 5% Korean results without going to the mendacious extreme of asserting that DNA testing is objectively meaningless in its totality. So, Marks is outrageously irresponsible but others are irresponsible as well.

Thus, by irresponsibly over-interpreting low % results (one cannot take too seriously 5% or less results for many of these tests, unless there are VERY solid reasons for assuming otherwise), both the companies and Der Movement leave an opening to filth like Marks to delegitimize the very idea of DNA testing, which itself is scientifically valid if responsibly interpreted (majority ancestry or high levels of “admixture” – albeit not in exact percentages – typically are more or less valid).

Second, the fantasy of absolute purity helps, ironically enough, to delegitimize the reality of race, thus:

Premise 1: The reality of race and the legitimacy of racial preservation depends upon absolute racial purity.

Premise 2: Absolute racial purity does not exist (as scientific studies tell us).

Conclusion: Therefore, there is no such thing as race, and racial preservation is illegitimate and irrelevant.

The fact that one can detect ancestry in these identities does not mean that they are products of nature.

Absolute insanity – proof positive that Jews are an evil, deceptive people.  I wondered how the System would “spin” the FACT that commercial DNA testing – with all its flaws – absolutely demonstrates the reality of race and can determine, with almost absolute certainty, a person’s major ancestry. Answer: DENY OBJECTIVE REALITY.  Just use REAL sophistry, deny reality that is right in front of people’s eyes, and spin a fantasy that hard reality is meaningless.  Difference between Right and Left: the Right adjusts ideology to hard reality; the Left attempts to adjust – nay, distort – reality to hard ideology.  Who do you trust – a fast-talking Jews who attempts to tell you that a Jew testing as a Jew is not “a product of nature” or Ted Sallis who tries to give a reasonable and balanced view of DNA testing?

Indeed, the word “trust” and “Jew” in the same sentence should make all your alarm bells go off.  And, really, in the end, consider – Marks is an Ashkenazi Jew and he tested as “95% Ashkenazi Jewish” – which would seem to me to be a solid result – and yet dismisses the biological validity and meaning of the results.  Focusing on the highly questionable minor “admixture” results to the exclusion of the rock-solid majority identity results is typical of the type of mendacious hand-waving characteristic of a certain ethny.  And the idea that one can just “look in the mirror” is destructive and absurd as discussed here.

Hmmm…a Jew who promotes destructive and absurd memes – who would have ever guessed?

Exposing the Jewish-Silker Alliance

Counter-Currents vs. the Silkers.

Important comment:

…since the current Chinese regime works hand-in-glove with international Jewry… 


My response:

So much for “Silk Road White nationalism” as an anti=Jewish alliance; indeed, the opposite is the case, the Silkers – some of whom admit to being deep state workers – actively promote Chinese-Jewish aggressive interests.

I will agree with this author that driving a wedge between some Chinese people and the Jewish-Silker alliance is a good thing, so please continue your good work.

To use their own crude and vulgar language – do the Silkers “suck Jewish cock?”

A Mendacious Middle Easterner

Another Hart attack.

Read this nonsense.

By this I am not suggesting that Jews are naturally unpatriotic because they are not Christians. The theological differences between religious Jews and religious Christians are minor compared with the differences between believers and non-believers, and orthodox Jews tend to be politically conservative. There are also many who are not religious but who still love and honor the United States, but this is not necessarily true of many atheists and agnostics.

 
Wow! A Jew states that he doesn’t believe that Jews are “naturally unpatriotic!”  Who would have ever guessed?  I mean, why let several thousand years of anti-nationalist, anti-patriotic, anti-majoritarian, and otherwise subversive Jewish behavior, in every land they have ever dwelt (nay, festered) in, including the United States of America, convince you otherwise?  Why let the Jews’ advocacy of anti-White and anti-American causes, their leadership of the “Civil Rights Movement” which ruined America, their leadership in overturning our demographics through the 1965 immigration act and through migrant cheerleading, their constant hostility to any manifestation of White identity whatsoever, their Israel-first identity and foreign policy preferences – why let any of that make you think otherwise?
 
Then he makes a moronic comment about “theological differences” as if that matters, or should we say maybe it does matter since both Jews and many “religious Christians” are in favor of open borders and the demographic eclipse of Europeans worldwide.  
 
Next we are told that “orthodox Jews tend to be politically conservative.”
 
OK.  First, most Jews are not orthodox.  Second, the wonderfully conservative orthodox Jews supported Clinton over Trump by a comfortable margin, albeit a bit less than their less religions co-ethnics. Third, even “conservative orthodox Jews” will in general hardly be reliable allies for any sort of Far Right White identity movement.  Fourth, those “conservative orthodox Jews” sure don’t have a problem exploiting America’s social welfare system, even to the point of being accused of welfare fraud.
 
Then Hart completes his outrageous screed by stating that “many” – we have to presume he is still talking about Jews here – who are not religious (Hart?) “still love and honor the United States” – but the real problem, you see, are all those “atheists and agnostics.”
 
So, according to the fantasy world of Hart, Jews – including secular Jews – are well-known for their upstanding patriotism and love for America, orthodox Jews are rock-solid conservatives wearing MAGA yarmulkes, while the real problem are all those (goyisch) “atheists and agnostics.”
 
What a despicable mendacious blot on humanity is this Hart.  But what about those who give him a forum?
 
Note to Richard Spencer: I agree with all you now say about the Alt Lite (and I was indeed saying it months before you), but what about really taking out the heavy memetic artillery and tackling the Alt Wrong?  You know, the guys who threw you under the bus because Hailgate offended all those HuWhite Jews of the West, and the guys who sniggered with their Jewish correspondents about the possibility of you getting shot.
 
They are the real problem on the Right, not the Alt Lite milksops.

Contrasting Ethnocentrisms

Contrasting ethnocentrisms.

One can say that the type of Middle Eastern ethnocentrism noted by many observers as characteristic of that region is formally analogous to the idea of a White ethnostate and the pursuit by Whites of their (very) legitimate racial interests.

But there is a fundamental difference.  Salter has proposed, and I endorse, the idea of Universal Nationalism – that every people have the right to preserve their own uniqueness, both biological and cultural, and this applies to non-Whites as well as Whites.  That’s an enlightened ethnocentrism.

However, on the other hand, Middle Eastern ethnocentrism is characterized by an aggressive dual morality and an expansionist, imperialist mindset.  Thus, one Middle Eastern people strive to be at the top of the human energy pyramid, both parasites and manipulators, those who oppose all nationalism except their own, and those who promote multiracialism and multiculturalism to destroy the West and the White race. Another group of Middle Easterners – and other non-Whites who follow a Middle Eastern High Culture – wish to colonize the West through their mass migration and impose their own civilization on Westerners, both a demographic and a cultural form of colonizing imperialism.  Thus, in contrast to Europeans, the well-known ethnocentrism of the Middle Eastern High Culture is aggressively particularistic and definitely not universal.  Universalism it seems is a trait of the West and of the West only.