Category: John Morgan

Greg Johnson and the Very Idea of HBD Privilege

Two part post.  Emphasis added.

First, Johnson’s HBD Scandza talk. I agree with more than 90% of it; so I’ll just comment on the few points of disagreement, as well as points that require more exposition.

I want to thank Frodi and the rest of the Scandza team for making this event possible, as well as all of you for coming out to hear me. 

Or not.

I am honored today to be speaking alongside these distinguished doctors of the human sciences. 

Who?  MacDonald?  Dutton?  “Human sciences?”  How about real STEM?  Zero.

My Ph.D., however, is in philosophy.

Qualified no doubt on this subject.

Philosophers don’t do scientific research. Instead, we stand back and try to talk about the big picture, including the meaning of scientific discoveries for politics and morals. 

How can you talk about the meaning of those discoveries if you don’t understand them?  If you believe that pseudoscientific trash is real science?

The main reason to reject the claim that America is a white supremacist society is the fact that some non-white groups—chiefly East Asians and certain communities of South Asians—do better than whites in key indicators of success, such as educational attainment, income, and law abidingness, and they did so before anti-white discrimination and non-white tokenism became rampant. 

HBD says they are our masters and betters!  Better start your measured groveling.

If American whites were intent on creating systematic white privilege and supremacy, we failed miserably. White racism is not a sufficient explanation for differing racial outcomes in America.

We have an alternative hypothesis based on the science of Human Biological Diversity. The differing levels of education, income, and law-abidingness—to name just three factors—among racial groups in America are precisely what we would predict given measurable differences of IQ and sociopathic personality traits between the races. For a survey of the effect of IQ on a wide range social outcomes, see Richard Lynn’s The Global Bell Curve. On racial differences in personality traits beyond just IQ, including psychopathy, see Michael Levin’s Why Race Matters (Oakton, Vir.: New Century Books, 2016).

HBD is NOT science.  Science includes vigorous hypothesis testing, not cherry picking data to support pre-conceived sociopolitical beliefs. For examples of HBD pseudoscience, see the posts here. In particular, see this.  And how come Johnson doesn’t mention his buddy Rushton in this speech?  Because he knew Dutton would be in attendance?  Thus, Johnson is either a coward for not mentioning Rushton if he still believes Rushton’s work is valid, or he is fundamentally dishonest for not publicly admitting that he (Johnson) was misled by Rushtonian fraud.  Which is it?

The science of Human Biological Diversity also explains why some non-white groups excel in white societies, even though they too have trouble finding flesh-colored band-aids.

Uh-huh.  HBD – NOT a science – is a political movement meant to subordinate Whites to Jews and Asians – no more and no less.  Useful idiots like the Amren and Counter-Currents crowd are ultimately working toward that end.

Every human being deserves a home, where he can be himself free of the interference of others. 

Does this include Hungarians being free of Morgan?  Romanians being free of Munro? Poles being free of Anton?  Italians being free of Farrell?  The ethnonationalists can’t even exemplify their ideal in their own private lives.

There is no moral imperative to destroy our homelands to accommodate strangers. 

Strangers like John Morgan in Hungary.

There would be no such imperative even if it were possible. 

Hungarians – deport Morgan.

And there is certainly no imperative to destroy real homelands in pursuit of the impossible dream of a society in which all peoples feel equally at home.

Yes, Bulgarians don’t need to hide their faces and wear sacks over the heads so Deasy feels at home when he visits there.

But there is one place where all the peoples of the world can feel at home. It is called the planet earth. This planet is big enough for all races and nations to have places they can call their own. This is the ethnonationalist version of utopia. 

The ethnonationalist version of utopia – living in other people’s nations, criticizing the natives, taking the women, and mocking the culture.

Second, more HBD stupidity:

The HBD-ethnonationalist-pro-Jewish-yellow supremacist alliance continues, this time presented by an estrogen-enriched effete French ”man” and a Lombard wanna-be. The “differences in intra-Italian IQ” are a figment of Lynn’s imagination. Intra-Italian genetic differences are real (as are other, albeit smaller, genetic differences throughout Europe), but are to be expected given the geographical structure of that nation and the various population movements throughout history.  Nevertheless, genetic kinship analyses – at least those I have seen of individuals’ genetic data – consistently put “Italians” as the closest population for peoples from different parts of that nation, including having S. Italians having top kinship hits with “Italians” (Bergamo) and “Tuscany.” You won’t see that in any of the sweaty ethnic fetishist articles.  As far as Ancient Rome goes, we await the Moots paper.  In any case, expect months of heavy breathing about the Italian genetics paper cited in the Amren post, even though it really doesn’t say anything fundamentally different than other papers of previous years.  The fetishists are positively deranged when it comes to Italians, particularly Southern Italians.

I suppose Amren is the centroid of the Jewish attempts to leverage their HBD fraud to divide Europeans and wreck racial activism.  After all, people with a four thousand year old history of nation wrecking are precisely the ones you want pulling the strings of your “nationalism,” eh?  

Absolutely despicable. We won’t forget what the HBD traitors are doing.  Pro-Jewish shills and peddlers of embarrassing Semite-approved pseudoscience.

Treason never prospers…well it does in the short-term, but dishonest evil, like HBD, tends to have a short half-life.

Grist for the Mill

More hard truths about the female.

Behold the female (emphasis added):

Psychologist Leon F. Seltzer has offered explanations for the phenomenon of male serial killers attracting female sex partners based on evolutionary psychology. Serial killers, in his view, are cases of alpha males that tend to attract women. This is because such males were good at protecting women and their offspring in our evolutionary history. Women nowadays may consciously realize that it is unwise to date a serial killer, but they are nevertheless attracted to them, as he notes “as a therapist I’ve encountered many women who bemoaned their vulnerability toward dominant men who, consciously, they recognized were all wrong for them”. As evidence of women’s fantasy preference for dominant men, he refers to the book A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World’s Largest Experiment Reveals about Human Desire by Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam. Seltzer discusses Ogas and Gaddam’s argument that this fantasy is the dominant plot of most erotic/romantic books and movies written for women but the fantasy always holds that this male dominance is conditional, “it doesn’t really represent the man’s innermost reality.”

One of the most infamous examples of hybristophilia is the large number of women attracted to Ted Bundy after his arrest. He often drew scores of women at the jammed courtrooms of his trials each day. Bundy allegedly received hundreds of love letters from women while he was incarcerated.
Jeffrey Dahmer, a serial killer, is said to have had amorous women sending him letters, money, and other gifts during his time in prison.
Serial killer Richard Ramirez married a female groupie in prison who had written him over 75 letters. During his trial, dozens of women flocked to the courtroom to catch a glimpse of him.
Charles Manson’s groupies are also examples .
Terrorists such as Anders Behring Breivik and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have also been the objects of hybristophilia.

Hundreds of love letters.  Hundreds.  For every single individual male serial killer or other male celebrity criminal – someone openly and obviously identified as defective by society – there are large numbers of ordinary “normal” women madly in love with them. And then there are the findings (this is just one example) that show that men with a criminal record are more successful with women than are law-abiding men.

Women: A sex selected by evolution to be demented sociopaths in the modern world.  All grist for the mill for Der Movement.  Indeed, sociopathic male grifters would want vacuous female airheads around, and this is more so if the males in question are impervious to the sexually manipulative behavior of (in particular, attractive) women. The women are part of the “D’Nations” herd and can be lures to bring in thirsty beta males as more cattle to be milked for “D’Nations.”

Read this.

Counter-Currents comment:

Brandon Martinez
Posted October 26, 2019 at 2:34 am | Permalink
If you believe that a substantial portion of modern white women can be “red-pilled” and join our cause, you are severely deluded. Women follow the crowd, and the crowd is against us. Only when fascist dictators came to power did women get in line out of necessity. If it’s not a necessity, they will simply tow the line of the predominant cultural narrative being set by our enemies. Trying to win over white women to white nationalism is about as futile as trying to win over jews or blacks to it. It is a wasted effort and energy better placed elsewhere, such as in obtaining political power.

Yes. Now, let us be clear here.  My comments about women are all about plain honesty and ice-cold realism. I never said that women should be completely excluded from activism. Consider the Legionary movement.  It was all male, but had an associated women’s group. That is reasonable, particularly if the women in their own group are held to high standards as are the men.  But we should never forget the reality of sex differences and never forget that the women should be subordinate to the men.

Greg Johnson
Posted October 25, 2019 at 6:33 pm | Permalink
I think she is a groupie. She was sleeping with Eli Mosley, and the scuttlebutt at the time was that she was dragging on more than Richard Spencer’s cigarette while he was still married, and while she was with Mosley — or at least pretending publicly to be with him.

Johnson should ask the following two questions – if Spencer is really as vacuous and destructive and amoral as you apparently believe he is, then how did he so quickly rise to prominence in the “movement?’’  Why did he so quickly get folks like Regnery trusting in him?  An honest answer to those questions would have to include an acknowledgment that Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program is a very real thing, and that Spencer checked off all of the boxes – none of which included the item of actual merit.

Let’s all feel bad now for this horrendous little Ladogan, whining about being mistreated online. Welcome to the rough-and-tumble of celebrity politics, you obnoxious semi-mongoloid twit. No one forced you to be a public figure, with your harridan “how dare you” and all the rest.  A perfect example of the female mentality.  This is where Johnson, as usual, gets it all wrong.  It’s not that WE say “women have no agency.”  It is that women themselves, when the going gets too tough, start whining as if THEY believe they have no agency, and therefore should have no accountability for their actions. They want equality of rights, but no equality of responsibilities.  They behave like spoiled children. 

Greg Johnson
Posted October 26, 2019 at 4:10 pm | Permalink
There aren’t millions of people in the movement.
And the Alt Right did crash and burn because of bad decisions made by bad leaders.

Yes, indeed; case in point: Greg Johnson.

Greg Johnson
Posted October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm | Permalink
Whenever you see a sycophant like Evan McClaren or Chris Dulny, I want you to think of a tiny fish that clings desperately to a big fish for the ride — as well as for the privilege of eating its shit.

You forgot to include John Morgan on that list.

WWI: The Lie to End All Lies

Contra Johnson’s thesis.

Let’s consider Johnson’s absurd thesis that WWI (and II!) had nothing to do with petty nationalistic competition between European nation states, but instead was due to “empires.”

I will now consider this, excerpts follow (emphasis added) with some comments:

The early years of the 20th century saw tremendous growth in Europe of both population and prosperity. With arts and culture flourishing, few believed a general war possible due to the peaceful cooperation required to maintain increased levels of trade as well as technologies such as the telegraph and railroad. Despite this, numerous social, military, and nationalistic tensions ran beneath the surface. As the great European empires struggled to expand their territory, they were confronted with increasing social unrest at home as new political forces began to emerge.

Nationalistic tensions. Well, everyone seems to recognize this reality except Johnson and his band of liars.  The idea that “empire” was a major driving factor is ludicrous.  Consider: In WWI, the British, French, and Russian empires were allies, even though in past decades and past centuries, these empires were in conflict.  What changed?  Simple – the national interests of the states in question. The fact that they were empires were incidental. There were conflicts of national interests, and imperial considerations were just one manifestation of those national conflicts of interests. By 1914, the rise of Germany was the threat that brought together the convergence of British, French, and Russian interests.  Empires or no empires, the shifting constellations of national interests would have existed and led to war.

Rise of Germany

The main issue.

In the resulting Treaty of Frankfurt which ended the war, France was forced to cede Alsace and Lorraine to Germany. The loss of this territory badly stung the French and was a motivating factor in 1914.

Indeed.  A territorial dispute – local European territory not colonial – was a motivating factor in the rush to war.  Petty nationalism, conflicts between neighboring states, historical enmity and revanchism – all in the mix.

Building a Tangled Web

As we’ll see, the “tangled web” of alliances – Johnson’s vaunted “temporary solutions to temporary problems” – led to the war that helped wreck the White world.

With Germany united, Bismarck began setting about to protect his newly formed empire from foreign attack. 

Empire?  Johnson starts breathing heavily. Unfortunately for him, “empire” in this context is the modern German nation state, cobbled together from an amalgamation of smaller entities.  So, at what point is today’s ethnonationalism merely a current interpretation of past imperialism?  Freedom for Bavaria!

“A Place in the Sun” and the Naval Arms Race

An ambitious leader and the grandson of England’s Queen Victoria, Wilhelm sought to elevate Germany to equal status with the other great powers of Europe. As a result, Germany entered the race for colonies with the goal of becoming an imperial power. 

In other words, Germany’s pursuit of a real empire was a result of petty nationalist competition with Great Britain and France.

These efforts to obtain territory overseas brought Germany into conflict with the other powers, especially France, as the German flag was soon raised over parts of Africa and on islands in the Pacific.

Petty nationalism started the process.  Overseas conflicts were a manifestation of this.

A global power, Britain moved in 1902 to form an alliance with Japan to curtail German ambitions in the Pacific. This was followed by the Entente Cordiale with France in 1904, which while not a military alliance, resolved many of the colonial squabbles and issues between the two nations.

Suddenly, “colonial squabbles” lost their importance in light of the German threat.  If the nations of Europe had been confederated, none of this would have occurred.  Instead we got Johnson’s “temporary alliances.”  Followed by a world war.

This pan-Slavic sentiment was backed Russia who had signed a military agreement to aid Serbia if the nation was attacked by the Austrians.

Yet we are told by some (commentators at Amren) that pan-Slavism is an acceptable alternative to pan-Europeanism.

Turning to their ally, the Austrians inquired regarding the German position on the matter. On July 5, 1914, Wilhelm, downplaying the Russian threat, informed the Austrian ambassador that his nation could “count on Germany’s full support” regardless of the outcome. This “blank check” of support from Germany shaped Vienna’s actions.

Always the troublemakers.

Behind the scenes in Berlin, German officials were eager for a war with Russia but were restrained by the need to make the Russians appear as the aggressors.

Surprise!

The Dominoes Fall

While the German military clamored for war…

I’m shocked, shocked I say.

Early on July 31, Russia began a full mobilization of its forces in preparation for war with Austria-Hungary. This pleased Bethmann-Hollweg who was able to couch German mobilization later that day as a response to the Russians even though it was scheduled to begin regardless. 

My being shocked continues. 

Though it was unlikely that Britain could have remained neutral if France was attacked, it entered the fray that next day when German troops invaded Belgium activating the 1839 Treaty of London. 

Those pesky treaties and alliances again.

On August 6, Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia and six days later entered into hostilities with France and Britain. Thus by August 12, 1914, the Great Powers of Europe were at war and four and a half years of savage bloodshed were to follow.

Thank you, petty nationalism.

Comment left at Counter-Currents:

HungarianFashionista
Posted September 29, 2019 at 12:59 pm | Permalink
(Health warning: The first 30 minutes of this podcast contains a large dose of WW1 Entente propaganda.)
I wish Western nationalists would stop pontificating about and lecturing Eastern Europe. We take care of our corner of the white world, and you take care of yours, that should be the rule in nationalist politics.

They should stop pontificating about Southern Europe as well, a topic about which they clearly know nothing.

We take care of our corner of the white world, and you take care of yours, that should be the rule in nationalist politics.

You would think that “ethnonationalists” would inherently understand that, but, you see, in reality they are ethnoimperialists.  For example, the British-Saxon hybrid John Morgan believes he has the right to live in Hungary, despite not being an ethnic Hungarian, while pontificating about Hungary and lecturing to Hungarians, all the time lauding the alleged virtues of “ethnonationalism.”  It’s “ethnonationalism for me but not for thee” for these imperialistic invasive hypocrites.

What Do They Really Mean by “Ethnonationalism?”

What they really mean.

What do the likes of Johnson-Morgan-Munro-Deasy-Farrell really mean by the term “ethnonationalism?”

What they pretend to mean is something like this:

Ethnonationalism means that every ethnic group will have their own homeland for their exclusive use; every people will have their ethnically homogeneous nations in which they’ll be free of interference and invasion from other peoples.

Very well.

However, based on their behavior, their attitudes, what they do and what they accept, the real meaning is:

Ethnonationalism means that Northwest Europeans will have homelands for their exclusive use, homogeneous nations in which they’ll be free of interference and invasion from other peoples; at the same time, Northwest Europeans will have the right to live wherever they choose, including in other people’s nations, interfering with the ability of those other peoples to live in the manner they wish among their own kind.

Hungary? Certainly!  After all, Budapest is not for the Hungarians; instead it is an “open city,” available for colonization by the racial masters and betters of the lowly Magyars. Italy?  Certainly!  Live there, mock woppish ineptness, while, of course, bedding Italian women. Romania? Certainly!  Live there while writing the most offensively scurrilous screeds against the Romanian people and, of course, mating with Romanian women. Bulgaria!  Certainly!  Swagger through the streets like you own the place, desperately trying to avoid being traumatized by the faces of the natives (which “take some getting used to” – in their own country!). Iberia? Certainly!  Let’s get those dago wogs out of Britain, while allowing British expats to colonize Spain with their ethnically exclusive enclaves.

For these types, “ethnonationalism” is really ethnoimperialism; they want to be the feudal lords of a racial aristocracy. However, other peoples, who are true ethnic and racial nationalists, may have different ideas about this.

I’d also like to point out that this attitude of the ethnonationalists on the Right mirrors similar attitudes of “we’ll do whatever the hell we want” from their co-ethnics on the Left. Thus, we see some people who believe they have the right to forcibly dump Afro-Asiatic invaders into the living spaces of other peoples. The attitude is exactly the same.

Am I being unfair to any Far Right “activists?”  Well, they always have the opportunity to redeem themselves. Morgan, for example, can publicly admit to being a hypocrite, apologize, and leave Hungary, pledging never to return.  That would be a useful start in ending the hypocrisy.

Odds and Ends, 9/23/19

More  race and “movement” news.

Let’s reconsider John Morgan – on the left here – who, truth be told, vaguely resembles Jack Nance in Eraserhead.

Hypocrite John Morgan should reflect on that not all “southern Italians” and other White ethnics are “loud and aggressive” and that some of these people may have had worse school experiences – by far – than he himself, being forced to “integrate” with feral Negroes and mulatto Hispanics, all courtesy of Morgan’s co-ethnics like Hubert Humphrey and John Lindsay. Poor Morgan had to keep up with all those “aggressive” wops, while other people were regularly getting physically assaulted (or worse) by the Black/Brown biological weapons the co-ethnics of Morgan unleashed on the children of lower middle-class/working class urban Whites.  

Hey!  Did the half-Italian Polignano have to go because he was too loud and aggressive for the shy and sensitive Morgan? Was cool kid Mikey swaggering around Budapest, bullying Johnny and giving him “wedgies?”  Considering that the Swede Friberg made Morgan cower in fear, a wop-mick hybrid may have been just too much to handle.

Bottom line – any White ethnic who is part of Der Movement, Inc. is an idiot. Experto crede.

The HBD-Nordicist alliance continues. Sallis right once again.  But, come now – having “Sallis” and “right” in the same sentence is a redundancy.  All that’s needed at this point is for McCulloch to start writing for Unz – joining Johnson and Durocher.

By the way, a comment left by an Amren reader:

Mr. Mac Daddy Flex 

This is especially true for the European races, and most of all for the Northern European race, the founding and still the majority American racial type. Due to the recessiveness of its genetic traits and its low birthrate (possibly aggravated by an adverse reaction to multiracial conditions) it probably requires reproductive isolation more than any other race if it is be preserved. 

I know this was written in 1995, but Northern European traits aren’t recessive and Northern Europeans have the highest fertility rate both in the United States and Europe. It is Eastern and Southern Europeans who have the lowest fertility rates (both in the USA and Europe.)

I’m not sure why this guy thinks that anyone in Der Movement cares about “Eastern and Southern Europeans” other than that they should just give in their “D’Nations” and sit down and shut up.  And, oh, yes, please stop picking on John Morgan; he’s standing in the corner about to burst out in tears.


Read this.

It must be remembered that the Jews operate by discovering and exploiting causes of dissent within nations, inciting classes and comparable groups within the nation to reciprocal antagonism, and exacerbating the rivalries to the point of civil war, until the nation is paralyzed and reduced to masses of individuals who no longer feel they have anything in common except the geographical territory they inhabit.

Let’s update for Der Movement:

It must be remembered that the Jews operate by discovering and exploiting causes of dissent within the West, within the European family of peoples, inciting ethnicities and comparable groups within the White race to reciprocal antagonism, and exacerbating the rivalries to the point of civil war, until the race is paralyzed and reduced to atomized ethnies and sub-races who no longer feel they have anything in common except that they are all targeted for destruction by the same enemies.

Thus, HBD. And petty nationalism and ethnoimperialist “ethnonationalism.”


An HBD argument against the White ethnostate:

JohnEngelman
If I lived in a white ethnostate I would not be able to admire the Oriental women.

Who said that Asians pimp out their women to influence White male behavior?  Who said that one motivation for HBD among Whites is sexual access to Asian females?

Sallis – always right.

A Heretical Thought About Williams Syndrome

Heretical at least from Der Movement’s perspective.

Previously this blog has discussedand extended, a hypothesis linking East Asian phenotypes with those of Down’s syndrome.  Many fruitful ideas came from that analysis (*).

Consider what Taylor talks about starting at 5:57 here.

So, analogous to Down’s Syndrome, can we speculate that certain ethnies mimic aspects of the Williams Syndrome phenotype, particularly with respect to the pathologically trusting and aracial aspects of Williams Syndrome patients’ behavior?

Who might such ethnies be, we wonder?  Perhaps, if they were alive today, John Lindsay and Hubert Humphrey could help us find an answer. Or maybe Taylor Swift can help us figure it out.

Is this scenario why some in Der Movement are so outraged over the term “pathological altruism” and try to deny that such a pathology exists? Does it hit too close to home?

After all, if Lynn can pathologize Negro behavior, and if Brand had no qualms about pathologizing wop behavior, certainly, in the name of “race realism” and “the pursuit of the truth,” we can pursue these other lines of inquiry.  We certainly don’t want Durocher to accuse anyone of “ethnic hurt feelings,” now, do we?

*Believe it or not, I just noticed right now where that Down’s Syndrome hypothesis originated. Too funny for words – except to say that the battle lines against Asian-worshipping HBD are being drawn quite clearly, are they not? I suppose Williams Syndrome is the behavioral distinction between those on either side of those lines (except for the ethnocentric Jews who push HBD for their own self-interest; I am really referring to the puppets who are easily manipulated by leering Levantines).

Calling Out John Morgan

Behold a despicable hypocrite.

John Morgan unburdens himself:

I can relate to this. Although I went to what was then considered a “good school” in suburban New York (mainly because of the few number of blacks in it, I suspect), the bulk of my class consisted of Jews and southern Italians, with a fair smattering of Asians and Hispanics. In other words, there were few other children in my childhood who were like myself; that is, of Northern European descent. And even those few other kids who were of such ethnicity often felt pressured to try to act like the generally much louder, more outgoing, and more aggressive Italians and Jews simply because they didn’t want to be thought of as “uncool.”

Dem dere aggressive afrowops terrorizing John Morgan – for shame!  Note though how Morgan describes himself – “like myself; that is, of Northern European descent.” Very good. And where does the ethnonationalist Morgan, of self-described “Northern European descent,” live?  In Hungary – a nation of Central-Eastern Europe, inhabited by a people (“Magyar” Hungarians) genetically and culturally distinct from Morgan. This despicable hypocrite, this ethnically aggressive invader, cannot leave the Hungarian people alone to enjoy the fruits of their ethnic homogeneity. If being around people “like myself” is important to Morgan, as it undoubtedly is to Hungarians, then can John Morgan please leave Hungary?

Let’s continue examining Morgan:

(I’m not saying that I don’t consider southern Italians to be white and European; of course they are…

And they are ever-so-happy you’ve given them your stamp of approval, condescendingly granted from your Inner Hajnal throne occupying another people’s territory in Budapest.

…but anyone being honest knows that they come from a culture that is very different from that of Northwestern Europe, even if we share a common civilizational background.) 

Excuse me, your outrageously hypocritical no-character worm, the same can be said about Hungary and “Northwestern Europe.”  When the hell are you going to leave the Hungarian people alone?  Inquiring minds want to know.

I wasn’t one of them, however…

You are not Hungarian either.  Please leave the country.

…and during my early childhood I had very few friends and no close ones, and there was plenty of mutual dislike between me and my classmates. 

Maybe some Hungarians dislike you and your presence in their country.  Please leave.

I established a few more solid friendships by high school, but in retrospect even those were pretty lackluster compared to the friendships I was to have in later life. In other words, I had few friends and little context within which to understand my own background and identity…

Said “background and identity” is not Hungarian, you low-life turd.

 – and I wasn’t even aware that this was lacking until years later. This was still better than if I had gone to a school where “diversity” was even stronger; I can only imagine what children of a background similar to my own who grow up in majority non-white schools must go through. So I’m quite sure the problem you’re talking about is real and getting worse.

I’m calling you out Morgan – ethnonationalist hypocrite.

John Lindsay was a strong supporter of the anti-White Black extremist “Five Percenters.”

Thanks to Clarence 13X’s close relationship with Mayor John Lindsey, in 1967 the Five Percenters leased a prime piece of Harlem property from the city. The “Allah School in Mecca” still serves as Five Percent headquarters. Painted above the building’s entrance are the words “The Black Man Is God.”

Apparently, Lindsay’s “esthetic prop” was a turboprop indeed.  Was it pathological altruism, or simply naked ethnic aggression against New York’s White ethnics?

The obsession with Negro hair is tiresome.