Category: lack of immigration enforcement

March of the Happy Penguins

Defund Der Movement.

VDARE.com and American Renaissance, to quote the Boomer Movie Animal House, have “a long tradition of existence.” They’ve both been around a long time, sort of like their editors. And they’re not going anywhere—particularly in Peter’s case, because he has a young family to support!

Here Lydia essentially agrees with EGI Notes that the panhandling at VDARE is, at least to a partial extent, designed to support the Happy Penguins lifestyle: “particularly in Peter’s case, because he has a young family to support.”  Indeed.

Peter keeps wittering about building a completely new links page on VDARE.com, featuring an index of absolutely all Dissident Right content producers.

“Absolutely all.”  Very good.  I look forward to seeing the EGI Notes and Western Destiny blogs linked to from VDARE.  That’s what “absolutely all,” means, eh?

First of all, I want to thank John Derbyshire for reading this letter on behalf of VDARE.com and I want to announce here that we expect him back for our next Christmas webcast—last time he greatly impressed our viewers by drinking half a bottle of bourbon on camera with no visible effect!

Can “Rosie” do the same?

Who said immigrants couldn’t assimilate?!!

And honesty would entail mentioning that Derbyshire is essentially an amnestied illegal immigrant (*), the very thing VDARE purports to oppose.  

What can I say, Peter and I are breeders, and with three little girls…

Get those donations rolling in…please give generously (children used as fundraising props again).

If the United States had not permitted my wife to immigrate in 1986, we should have gone to live in some other country. Perhaps I would have gone to live in China. The United States is under no obligation to respect my marriage preferences.

Very good.  So, if a future White ethnostate, under no similar obligation, decides that the Derbyshire clan has to go, Johnny will leave with no complaints.  Right?

See here.

Despite his oft-voiced opposition to illegal immigration, Derbyshire has admitted that he was an illegal immigrant himself in the U.S. before achieving legal residence and eventual citizenship. He has even joked about his former illegal status, comparing himself to a “reformed drunk at a temperance meeting.” According to Derbyshire, no American ever expressed concern about his immigration status…

Well, I’m expressing concern right now.  Get out of my country, illegal invader.

Advertisements

Happy May Day Donald Cuck

And other “movement” stupidity.

All the blustering, as usual, leads to pathetic omega male cuck capitulation.

Despite Trump’s threats, earlier on Monday Vice President Mike Pence admitted the caravan members would be processed in line with the law.

Cue Roissy posting gifs of “MAGA man Trump” strutting around, or posts about him “negging” some hag.  After all, that’s real important and all.

His administration’s hands are tied, however, by international rules obliging the United States to accept asylum applications.

How about the US announces it is no longer bound by those “laws?”  How obvious is it that any illegal can claim to be a “refugee” seeking “asylum?”

But, hey, King Cuck has other problems.

I hope that “lay” was really worth it, Donald Cuck.

Read this.

I wonder of any of these Type Is have realized that Evola wasn’t a Viking warrior, but instead one of those greasy five footers swarming like locusts all over the Wilmot Estate?

And this.

In contrast to the austere Anakim, the Sutherners are softer and more childlike. They love gold and luxury and are prone to material acquisitiveness and ostentation. They are inferior to the Anakim when it comes to martial ability, though they breed more and are more plentiful in number.

Evola the Afrowop Sutherner! Olive-skinned five-footers!

“Queen Ann.”  Is that what Dinesh called her in the morning (while Costello is bustling in the background, cooking them breakfast).

The creeping fungus takes hold.

More King Cuck

Roissy weeps.

The Trumpian fraud, emphasis added:

President Donald Trump may have announced that “DACA is dead” over the weekend, but statistics released Monday by the Justice Department appear to suggest otherwise.

Since the start of January this year, the Trump administration has approved tens of thousands of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) applications and renewals, a quarterly report from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has revealed. (The report was filed in court by the Justice Department in an ongoing legal fight with California).

More than 55,000 initial and renewal applications were approved by the Trump administration in the past three months alone…

 

Pathetic homoerotic Trump fanboy Roissy (cuck nagger) weeps bitter tears.

The Alt Right crowd doubts Trump has what it takes.  Some of us know that before he was elected.

Hmmm…This Sounds Familiar

Amnesty is forever, enforcement is never.

Read this.  The take home point that the Left is beginning to realize (emphasis added):

Giving Trump some policy changes and funding for the border wall, in exchange for citizenship for 1.8 million undocumented immigrants, is essentially trading a set of policies that can be reversed by future Democratic administrations for a citizenship grant that cannot be reversed by anyone. Even if Trump gets everything he wants on his immigration “framework,” he would still disappoint his core constituency on its most important issue.

Sound familiar? That’s right, you read it here first.

This truth is obvious to me – and as I said but would like to repeat for the record, if you are reader of EGI Notes you saw it here first – it’s obvious to the Left, and a few on the Right are catching on. But the bulk of the Right, including some Trump fanboys and Alt Right lulzers on the Far Right, still don’t get it.  Trump and his team of inept heroes don’t get it, or if they do get it, they simply don’t care – which means that they are running a scam job, a fraud job, on their supporters.

There’s no excuse for this, no excuse for not realizing this, as this was the main flaw of Ronnie Raygun’s amnesty disaster – a disaster that the Right likes to mention but have not learned the right lessons from.  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, my friends – “promises” of enforcement – meaningless.  “Allocations” for a wall (at best a secondary feature of enforcement, by the way) and for more “border security” – worthless.  Amnesty given to the Nightmarers – priceless for them, an immediate and tangible gain.  Deporting the Nightmarers – priceless for us, an immediate and tangible gain.

No amnesty, never.  Making the same mistake a second time, when the stakes are so high essentially invalidates any pretensions any of these heroes – including The God Emperor himself – have for being responsible leadership.  And of the Alt Righters who buy into the “amnesty now, enforcement later” trade of the irreversible for the reversible, then they are as stupid as they accuse others of being.

Alt Right News, 2/2/18

Groundhog Day edition.

An Alt Right activist prepares to enjoy the holiday.  It’s of Germanic origin after all.  Heil Phil!

Someone else gets it, albeit a bit late.

The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that any other outcome than Nightmarer deportation is a failure. Der Touchback can win any sort of concessions but fat (as Roissy would say, heh) chance any of them becoming actualized long term.  Remember, amnesty is forever, enforcement is never.

And the political cost of deportation?  The media and the Left will make a huge cry and show “opinion polls” saying it is unpopular (like the same type of polls I stupidly believed in the fall of 2016 predicting a Clinton electoral victory), but so what?  These types will hate Trump no matter what he does (or does not do); remember the EGI Notes mantra: For the Left, hatred of Trump is a polite and socially acceptable way to express hatred of Whites.

With DACA deportation, the Left will hate Trump and the Democrats and Cuckservatives will oppose him. With DACA amnesty, the Left will still hate Trump and the Democrats and Cuckservatives will still oppose him.  Amnesty won’t win him or the GOP any votes from the Left; however, amnesty will cost both Trump and the GOP votes from the Right.

But, hey, the Alt Right Brainmasters (the leadership, not the rank-and-file who have healthier ideas, as the above-linked article shows us) tell us that supporting deportation is “stupid” and “short-sighted.”  Yes, indeed, let us be smart and politically pragmatic like Reagan was in 1986.  Worked real well for him.  And for us.

Meanwhile, Ann Coulter’s breakfast butler hysterically proclaims: “All Hail the God-Emperor’s State of the Universe Address!” Counter-Currents: How have the mighty fallen.

Like the movie Groundhog Day, history will repeat itself in an endless loop until Der Movement gets it right: Stop with the puerile Man on White Horse Syndrome worship.

Immigration: No Free Lunch

It’s NOT the economy, stupid.

I note, and have noted many times before, that the immigration question among the mainstream is continuously presented (almost solely) in economic terms.  The latest manifestation of this is the claim that immigration is the “closest thing to a free lunch” since population growth fuels economic growth via an increased number of workers and consumers. This Ponzi scheme view of economic growth fails for a number of reasons, including the obvious point that a larger economy divided over a larger population is not increasing the per capita payoff – it may be a larger pie, but not larger pieces for each individual. I note that as immigration has flooded into America over the past several decades, allegedly “fueling economic growth,” real wages for the typical American have stagnated, and the American middle class is in a well-documented and oft-discussed decline.  Is it that all this “growth” is lining the pockets of big business, and also benefiting the immigrants themselves and not natives?  Then we are constantly being told that automation will “make work obsolete,” and so a “basic guaranteed income” will be required in the wake of the mass unemployment thus created – a “citizen’s dividend” based on the productivity generated by automation and artificial intelligence.  If so, why do we import more people who will not only become superfluous as workers, but who will compete with natives for the proceeds of the productivity to be distributed as that guaranteed income?  

And even putting the issue of automation aside, the Ponzi scheme aspect of the immigration-population-economy equation becomes more clear when we ask: if immigrants do the work natives won’t do, then who will do that work in the next generation (assuming no automation) when the immigrants’ children are “Americans” or “Europeans” with American or European expectations and the consequent disdain for manual labor?  Do we import another generation of immigrants to do this unwanted work, repeated ad infinitum, until the entire nation is full of the posterity of those brought in to do cheap manual labor?  Conversely, if we need “high skilled immigrants” as we in America are constantly told, then why can’t we find Americans to do these desirable, highly-paid professional jobs?  Are native Americans stupid as well as lazy?  And, if so, how did they build a nation so attractive that all these immigrants want to come to in the first place?  And, further, if immigrants are required to fund “the retirement of an aging native population” (assuming that young non-Whites would politically support funding the retirement of old Whites who they hate), what happens when the immigrants themselves get old and retire?  Would more immigrants be required to fund those retirements – an endless pyramid scheme of immigration and inter-generational wealth transfer?  Or will the immigrants have enough children to support their retirement, underscoring the race replacement aspect of the immigrant influx?  Speaking of which, we can further ask – even if a declining native population “hinders economic growth” (a popular meme, along with the “who will pay for retirement” ploy, to justify genocidal alien immigration into Europe) – so what?   Eventually it will be a self-correcting process, as automation, increased productive efficiency, altered economic structures and expectations and, very likely, an eventual increase in the native birth rate, balances things out – sans replacement immigration.  I can also point out that bringing in hordes of cheap labor aliens to crowd out, compete with, and displace, natives is not exactly conductive to increasing native birth rates.  Or is that the intention?

Finally, we get to the most important, the most fundamental point.  Even if everything the pro-immigration crowd says about economic benefit is true, it still is not worth it.  A nation is not an abstract economic zone, and a people are not an atomized mass of workers and consumers.  Nations and peoples are historical entities, with particular ethnic, racial, social, and cultural profiles, and a people being demographically and culturally displaced and replaced are not benefiting, even if “the economy grows.” Mass immigration of alien peoples, particularly in the context of declining native populations, is genocide against the natives, and what price economic growth if historical nations and peoples cease to exist, and vanish from the Earth?  Read this post for a more technical analysis of the precedence of genetic continuity and genetic interests over any economic concerns, and if you still insist on putting a “dollars and cents” measure on these issues, then read this.  Existence, not economic growth, is the fundamental concern of any people, and no amount of “economic growth” – most of which the native masses will never themselves enjoy – can never justify criminal genocidal policies targeted against beleaguered European-derived peoples.


This post is also relevant to another pro-immigration argument I’ve seen making the rounds again recently: “if you are against (legal and illegal) low-skilled immigration, then you have no good reason to oppose high-skilled immigration, which is such a net positive for our nation.”  Nonsense.  Read this post again, particularly the last section that emphasizes race and culture, and the genocidal implications of displacing and replacing the native population.  Read the linked posts, especially the one outlining the EGI concept and its importance to immigration.  Of course high-skilled immigration is harmful; indeed, one can make the argument that high-skilled non-White immigration is worse for Whites than low-skilled non-White immigration.  High-skilled immigration brings in more clever and capable enemies, more capable and clever competitors, the importation of an alien ruling class, using ethnic nepotism to displace native White Americans from positions of power and prestige.  High-skilled immigrants, free-riding on the society and infrastructure painstakingly built up by White Americans, will climb to the top of the human energy pyramid, leveraging ethnic cartel networks to squeeze Whites out and reduce White Americans to a subaltern caste within their own nation. Is that a good enough reason for you?  Is that sufficient reason to oppose high-skilled immigration?  They are not us, they are not wanted, we need to develop and nurture our own high-skilled population.  We do not want or need leering aliens lording it over us.

Deport the Nightmarers

Out with the trash.

Listen to this.

So, the Alt Righters believe that taking an extreme hard-line position on DACA and immigration is stupid and short-sighted; they assert that we need to be practical and understand the realities of political horse-trading to make progress to ease the demographic pressures from immigration.

I have four ripostes to that position:

1. First, whether or not that opinion position is valid or not, it would seem to be valid only for those people in political power who actually have the option to engage in such pragmatic political negotiations.   Miller in the White House may well need to consider such a course of action.  However, perhaps it would be best for Alt Righters talking and lulzing in their “Hate Loft” to take the most extreme positions possible, to push the discussion as far in the radical direction as possible.  Leave the mainstreaming to those who have the power to actualize political deals, and manifest vanguardism to keep the mainstreamers honest.

2. The only deal worth making in exchange for DACA amnesty is one that truly eliminates all future illegal immigration and makes enormous cuts to legal immigration.  A true end to the illegal influx and a mass decrease to the legalized dispossession of White Americans.  Does anyone believe that’s what we will really get?

3. Why can’t we get enforcement of existing law – perhaps coupled to the decreased legal immigration that a majority of Americans want – without giving amnesty to the Nightmarers?  Why must following existing law be held hostage to amnesty?  Why must listening to the will of the American people be held hostage to amnesty?

4. There is a more fundamental reason why amnesty is a bad idea, even with lots of concessions in return: trading something irreversible for something reversible is always wrong, always a bad deal

Amnesty for the Nightmarers will indeed be irreversible (absent revolution and the ethnostate), and giving them eventual citizenship would just solidify that irreversibility.  However, “strict enforcement” can always be reversed by a future administration, by a shift in Congress, by judges striking down laws, by cuts in funding, by passive aggressive refusal to enforce existing law (as we have today). Enforcement can be ignored, but amnesty is forever.  Don’t we remember the fiasco of the Reagan amnesty?  How soon we forget.  What about the “wall?” Isn’t that permanent?  First, that assumes it will ever get built.  Second, even if it is built, its utility is limited, people can get in other ways, without strict, ongoing internal enforcement of immigration law, the grant wall is mostly symbolic rather than effective.  Third, legal immigration quotas can always be increased in the future, putting those “big beautiful doors” in the almighty wall.  The wall itself, even if built, doesn’t amount to much compared to the will to actually enforce the law – with that will, the wall wouldn’t be necessary to begin with.  The wall, in the end, built or not, may end up being another Trumpian scam.  Why doesn’t the Trump team and all his fanboys realize #4?  Readers of this blog know the answer to that.

The Nightmarers should be deported.  That’s actually the humane option, as one could argue that the Nightmarers should be treated like part of an invading army; the military should be sent after them.  If the Nightmarers surrender, put them into POW camps until the immigration war is won, and then repatriate them to their nations of origin.  If they resist, treat them as you would any resisting military enemy – destroy the opposing force.  Have the army gun them down.

One could argue that.  This blog, steeped in humanist pacifism and the love for all peoples, obviously would not argue that, but some people may do so.