And other news.
Thoughts on Trump:
One thing that will be interesting about a Trump victory in 2020 will be how his fanboys will adjust their excuses for his continued uselessness and inaction after that. After all, the excuse of “he’s holding back so as to not endanger his chances of re-election” will no longer hold. Let’s see. First, they’ll say that “Trump is holding back so as to not endanger the GOP in the 2022 mid-term elections.” After that, it’ll be “Trump is holding back so as to not endanger the GOP Presidential candidate in 2024.” There will always be excuses. The excuses never end, just as Trump defending the interests of his base never begins.
Trump’s covid-19 comments to Woodward are not “bad” because of their actual content – it is just more Trumpian bluster, which never matches what he actually does (or, more often, does not do). By cutting off travel from China, he did more than any Democrat would have done at that time in his place, as they were all criticizing even that small step as “xenophobic;” the anti-Trump press were mocking him as a paranoid “germaphobe” and telling us that covid-19 was no threat.
No, the real problem here is that Trump would talk to a leftist journalist with a proven history of Republican Presidency-wrecking, that Trump would show such juvenile lack of judgment and political savvy (*) so as to go on record with his true feelings on the matter, compromising himself to the brain-dead public (who can’t distinguish rhetoric from action) during an election year. Trump is really an incompetent jackass and a laughably vulgar buffoon, as this blog has been telling you since 2016.
*One reason the Quota Queens love Trump so much is that they see themselves reflected in him – an incompetent, no judgment, juvenile, affirmative action case who doesn’t have the intellectual and behavioral “chops” to handle the job he has, a job he is making a mess of.
Moronic Chinatrix-loving HBDer is voting for Biden.
Danish Roosh invades Bulgaria.
The written history of Sofia begins with the conquest of the Serdi tribe in Serdica by the Romans in 29 BC. During the decline of the Roman Empire, Serdica was invaded by the Huns, Visigoths, and Slavs. In 809, Serdica became part of the First Bulgarian Empire and was known as Sredets. The Byzantines took over the area in 1018, but the Bulgarians reclaimed the city in 1194. For the next 200 years, Sredets developed into an economic and cultural hub in the region. That all changed when the Ottomans conquered the area in 1382. Around this time, the city became known as Sophia. Between 1520 and 1836, Sophia was the regional capital of Rumelia Eyalet, one of the main provinces of the Ottoman Empire.
Very interesting. Of course, he left out the invasion by the Bulgars, the group that, you know, the nation is named after. But what’s a bit of historical omission between friends, eh? I mean, the “First Bulgarian Empire” was established by who, exactly?
As a wanderer, dissident, and white nationalist, I hope that all stray dogs…
Real funny. In actuality, it were the whining West European Herrenvolk who prevented the Bulgarians from solving their stray dog problem. The same in Romania. Stray dogs, refugees…who cares as long as the Bulgarians suffer, right? They’re only wogs, right? But, alas, pathological altruism (enforced on others) has a way of backfiring, eh?
…heroes, and people find a home of their own.
In your case, either America or Denmark. Not Bulgaria. Not Eastern Europe. Please leave.
This is a useful review of On Genetic Interests, although I can quibble that some of the numbers may be outdated and some of the definitions wrong.
Read about Jodie Huang here. Now, once again, Sallis is right and others, in this case, Derbyshire is wrong.
Sallis promotes the idea of a Tropical or South-South, pan-Colored Alliance, of all “people of color” against Whites, in which Asians play a fundamentally important role. Sallis promotes the idea that the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. Derbyshire on the other hand, with his Chinese wife (“measured groveling” – his words describing his behavior towards her) and his half-Chinese children, promotes the absurd idea of an “Arctic Alliance” of Whites and Asians vs. non-Asian coloreds.
With the Huang case, we once again, for the umpteenth time, observe Asian solidarity with Blacks and other Colored against Whites. We once again observe Yellow as key component of the rising tide of color against White interests. Just because a pitiful miscgenenator chooses “measured groveling” as a marital strategy doesn’t obligate the rest of us to ignore the Asian threat.