Category: laughing at Derbyshire

Fisking Derbyshire, 2/19/18

A brief fisking.

So why was opium smoking so devastating among China’s poor? Adulteration, says Midler. In the extreme, a cheap variety named Hankow Cake contained no opium at all, only sesame seeds.  Midler:

Historians are so hell-bent on blaming the West for everything that went wrong with China in the nineteenth century that they have no room for an investigation into the serious possibility that the nation may have actually poisoned itself.

I would like to see some rigorous historical research on that, but it’s not implausible, and fits very well with the tiresome Chinese bellyaching about the wrongs done to them by foreigners.

How does it differ from Chinese fraud and mendacity today?

Chinese people acknowledge that an individual fellow-countryman may be wicked, but China as a nation can do no wrong.

National self-esteem is of course not an exclusively Chinese phenomenon. We Americans—well, some of us—treasure our “exceptionalism.” Chinese propagandists take it to the extreme, though.

Midler calls it “collective narcissism”  and quotes Lucian Pye, writing fifty years ago:

Nothing can be wrong with the Chinese spirit and their inward identity. All problems must lie outside and therefore be the work of “foreigners.”

But, of course.

Leszek Kolakowski in Main Currents of Marxism described Mao Tse-tung Thought as “a naïve repetition of a few commonplaces of Leninist-Stalinist Marxism.” He allows, however, that Mao was “one of the greatest, if not the very greatest, manipulator of large masses of human beings in the twentieth century.”

So Maoism was a cheap Chinese knock-off of Marxism-Leninism.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal…what else is new for the race of human photocopiers?

Why are so many of us so forgivingly fond of this exasperating, paradoxical, unstable place?  

Pathetic White nerds have Yellow Fever, that’s why.  The “awkward squad” wants to get laid.

Paul Midler quotes from the answer given by Progressive sociologist Edward Alsworth Ross in 1911.

Chinese are extremely likable and those who have known them longest like them best. Almost invariably those who harshly disparage them are people who are coarse or narrow or bigoted. They are not a sour or sullen folk. Smile at them and back comes a look that puts you on a footing of mutual understanding. Their lively sense of humor is a bond that unites them to the foreigner.

Substitute “Chinese” with “Negroes” and Derbyshire would rightly mock this quote, rife as it is with smug moral posturing: all you Chinese haters simply don’t know them.  Excuse my language, but…bullshit.

Ross (1866-1951) is an odd person for Midler to quote in this context.  He would himself be denounced as the worst kind of bigot today. He was a race realist, nativist, and eugenicist who strongly objected to race mixing—so strongly, he was fired from his professorship at Stanford in 1900 for his views.

In 1900!  Well, anyway, what’s the surprise?  A Nordicist HBD type who liked East Asians. Who would have ever guessed?

Much as he liked the Chinese, Ross did not want them settling in the U.S.A. This is a perfectly tenable position, although intolerably shocking to present-day orthodoxies.

Yes, it’s tenable.  Can the Derbyshire family please leave then?

Ross got the likability right, though, and “those who have known them longest like them best.” (Rodney Gilbert may have been an exception.)

Right…the usual SJW song and dance about how “only Whites who don’t know Coloreds are the ones who are bigoted against them.” Derbyshire himself would scoff at that regarding Blacks, why can’t we similarly scoff about Yellows?  I know Chinese very well.  I don’t like them.

And to the further collective credit of the Chinese must be added this: Unlike the nations of the West today, they have no intention of opening up the borders of their nation to tens of millions of foreigners.  Stupidity on that scale is peculiarly Western.

Yes, but having Jews around poisoning the well of sociopolitical discourse does not help.

What’s wrong with us?

We let former illegal alien Dreamer Derbyshire stay in America, bringing in his alien wife and producing mixed-race children.

Here’s the solution to the whole problem.  People who don’t like China and the Chinese should not live in China (likewise, Munro should get the hell out of Romania).  But, please, can we remove all people who posses Chinese descent – part or full – and those married to them from America?

Thank you.

Advertisements

Movement Roundup: Dolt Right, Yellow Fever, and Naivete

Alt Right, the Derb, and Jeronimus

Today’s regularly scheduled critique of the Alt Right will be postponed, and possibly will be significantly modified for future presentation, due to uncertainty about the ongoing chaos within the Alt Right.  It seems that – for now – AltRight.com has password-protected access and is no longer open to the general public.  Whether that is just a temporary situation, a technical glitch, or a more long-term change in their approach – who knows?  We’ll see.  And then “The Movement Critic,” in his own inimitable style, posts a continuous stream of material on Alt Right bigwigs; even if only a small fraction of that is accurate, it is troubling and indicative of a chaotic mess.

We’ll have to keep a close eye on these developments, and the potential impact on Der Movement, Inc. and on White racial nationalism in general.

At this point, I see no reason to change my “this too shall pass” prediction about the Alt Right: sooner or later it will turn out to be another “movement” passing fad, and we’ll look back (as usual) at all the wasted time, effort, and money and wonder what happened.

For me, it is getting closer and closer to 25 years – a quarter-century – of putting up with “movement” nonsense, and the most frustrating thing is seeing the same mistakes being made over and over again.  I’ve already talked about the endless Man on White Horse Syndrome, but the latest fiascos are something different: the “movement” propensity to eagerly grasp onto any follower, any self-proclaimed savior, any person who professes their “willingness to help” or their interest in any way, without the slightest degree of skepticism, prudence, alertness, or discretion on the part of the “movement” whatsoever.  Regardless of the actual outcome of the Kline/Mosely military combat revelations, the main point I get from that is (from the NY Times article):

He rose from a self-described “anonymous Twitter troll” to head of one of the largest groups in the so-called alt-right.

There you go.  A rapid rise indeed.  Some “extreme vetting” no doubt.  Anyone see a pattern in any of these recent events?  Kline/Mosely.  The Jorjani fiasco.  The comedy of Hermansson and the other recent infiltrations. It’s the same old story.  Impatience, immaturity, a lack of judgment, a lack of depth, and zero accountability.

Forget about “extreme vetting” – there is no vetting at all.  There’s no discretion, no prudence, when it comes to personnel. No screening – real screening.  No conception that a person has to “pay their dues” over time, to invest years of activism, to be known by established activists, to “make their bones” – even if merely by consistent and useful online work – before being trusted with any sort of position or authority.  No, to Der Movement, if you are ostensibly White, can fog a mirror held up to your nose, and profess allegiance to “the cause” – you’re in, handed the “keys to the kingdom” after an “apprenticeship” of weeks (or, if you’re Swedish, days…or maybe hours).  Of course, it’s true that a determined infiltrator can become a mole and put years of work in and climb in the “movement” – one has to be on guard even then.  But, by analogy, just because a highly-skilled professional cat burglar can circumvent the sophistical security you have to protect your valuables is no excuse to shrug, give up, and just leave your front door wide open.  It’s an ongoing “Red Queen” scenario of mutual completion and adaption on both sides; if one side just cedes the fight then they lose every time.  And it’s not just infiltrators, keeping up standards weeds out well-meaning but incompetent individuals or individuals who are sincere but of poor character, chronic liars who cannot be trusted.  Also, people who have invested years into serious activism, not merely lulzing or Nutzi acting out, and who prove a sound theoretical, ideological, and moral understanding of the situation – these are less likely to drop out or turn traitor.

And remember this when the Millennial Alt Righters decry the “extremism” of “Boomer” “White Nationalism 1.0”:

Speaking previously on a far-right podcast, Mr Kline identified himself as a HR person who fires “n****** and sp*** all day. Before that I was in the army and I got to kill Muslims for fun. I’m not sure which one was better, watching n****** and sp*** cry they can’t feed their little mud children or watching Muslims’ brains sprayed on the wall. Honestly both probably suck compared to listening to a k*** scream…”

The Alt Right is the enemy of White racial nationalism.  Better a hundred William Pierces than any of these crude, vulgar, lulzing, drunken jackasses.  That’s why I put The Movement Critic on my blog list, at least for now.  Not that I agree with most or all that is there (although most of it is highly amusing), but Der Movement needs a good disinfectant, and the more stringent, the better.

No doubt Derbyshire finds it ‘thrilling.”  Just his “cup of tea: so to speak, no?

Then we have Strom’s Jeronimus interviews.

Part I.

Part II.

Interesting premise and the overall strategy can be one approach, of several, to pursue, but there are some basic problems.

This Jeronimus says he in his “late 40s” but seems to not have learned too much. Contrast this to Strom in his early 60s, who exhibits a bit more prudence.  With the idea of having White families renting out apartment space in cities, Strom brings up the obvious problem of “fair housing” laws and that the project “will need a good lawyer.” That’s realistic and prudent, and anticipates problems and contingencies.  Jeronimus, on the other hand, blows off these concerns, blithely assuring us that “no one will bother you” as long as you are “not LARPING” (why must a Generation Xer use such Millennial terms?).  I tend to agree with Strom’s skepticism.  You’ll need to very carefully “fly under the radar” and to the extent the strategy is successful, the greater the chance of the System understanding what is going on and attempting to sabotage it.  The fact that some scattered Nutzis here and there are presently unmolested, while doing something vaguely similar, in one sense proves my point, as the System will target the more successful and, hence, dangerous manifestations of this.  Perhaps by not “LARPING” and being more serious that would make the project more of a target?

That’s not say: “don’t so it.”  DO do it.  But don’t go in half-assed, assuming everything will work out, and not having contingency plans for problems.  Don’t underestimate the enemy and don’t underestimate their mendacity and persistence in preventing White organization. Of course you’ll need legal representation and a whole host of other things that this Jeronimus apparently has not considered (no worries though – all those imaginary billionaire sugar daddies will find it all).  I for one cannot really trust the judgment of anyone who would so casually dismiss Strom’s caution.  And why publicize the project at such an early date, to increase the probability of being targeted?

Related to that, it was Strom who brought up the obvious point of “should we be talking about this publicly?” (But they continued to do so and this has been put up on the website).  “The revolution will not be televised” – but  it sure will be podcasted about in advance, I guess.

The same “movement” ineptness, lack of judgment, absence of prudent contingency planning, etc.  Everything is half-assed, assumed, poorly planned.

And the idea that any of the current crop of White Billionaires will fund anything pro-White is ludicrously naïve.  If these billionaires were so inclined, there’s a lot they could have done already to help pro-White causes.

And: Allen Dulles killed JFK?  Evidence?

There’s that old saying that “military intelligence” is an oxymoron.

And so it goes…

Some Great News! And Some Derbyshire Bits

How did I miss this good news?  Another HBDer and race-mixer bites the dust.

From the tear-stained ramblings of the execrable John Ray:

IN MEMORIAM: CHRIS BRAND 

The last 12 hours have been very tearful for me. After a long battle, Chris Brand has just passed away…Something that upsets me about Chris’s death is that I could have prevented it if I had known earlier what I know now.  He died in an NHS (government) hospital of hospital-borne infections. He got one after another, progressively weakening him until he had nothing left to fight with.  NHS hospitals are riddled with hospital borne infections and Scottish NHS hospitals are said to be worse even than English ones…Curse and goddam the NHS! 

…Chris’s wife, Dr. Shiou-Yun Fang…is from Taiwan…

All I have to say is bless and all praise the beloved NHS!


I know there are some who will say it is “unpleasant and unseemly” to be cheerful over someone’s death.  No doubt this will be ascribed to my “insanity” and/or “bitterness.”  No, it is completely logical. As readers of this blog are well aware, I consider (and with good reason) HBD as an anti-White political movement that delegitimizes White racial nationalism in favor of a pro-Jewish and pro-Asian “cognitive elitism.”  I have, in great detail, analyzed this aspect of HBD; thus, I view a White male HBDer married to a Chinese female as functionally equivalent to a White male traitor who spies for China at the behest of a female Chinese “honeypot” agent.  Question: if Merkel were to suddenly die of an illness, what would the “movement’s” reaction be?  You know very well there would be significant joy in many quarters; to my mind, there is no real difference between Merkel and Brand.  I’m not going to mourn the passing of someone who attacks White racial interests, and supporters of HBD do indeed, in my opinion, attack those interests.

On a side note: if it was so obvious, even to Brisbane Johnny, that NHS hospitals are unsafe, why didn’t Brand’s high-IQ waifu realize this?  And if Ray and Brand were such close friends why didn’t Ray know what hospital Brand was in?  All these folks are such cognitive elitists, and the most fundamentally basic and important facts just pass over their heads.  Are these the betters of all you pro-White activists out there?

This VDARE post is full of all sorts of amusing tidbits (and the great news about Chris Brand of which I was unaware – thank you Mr. Derbyshire for brightening up my day and providing the topic for the first part of this blog post), including an item Derb mentions about which I have some inside information – information of which Derbyshire is quite obviously completely unaware – but of which I’m not at liberty to write about.  On a wholly unrelated (of course! of course!) matter, here’s an interesting book.

Some other items about, or relevant to, Derbyshire:

HBD and Silk Road News

HBD, Derbyshire, and Asians, oh my.

My listener’s speculation that females are more likely than males to die from wounds goes against the general truth that women survive better than men in most lethal scenarios. This is one aspect of the great universal principle that sperm is cheap but eggs are expensive.  Reading accounts of the Donner Party, for example, one is struck by how many more women than men survived.

Yeah, just off the top of my head, I can make two reasonable hypothesis, re: the Donner party.  First, women have smaller caloric requirements than men (at least back then, when the typical female BMI was less than 10,000), and, second, no doubt the “women and children first” white knighters were giving the women first crack access to food and protection from the cold, and the women were not required to do as much work or take the same risks..

Looking this up at Wikipedia more or less confirmed those ideas:

Men have been found to metabolize protein faster, and women do not require as high a caloric intake. Women also store more body fat, which delays the effects of physical degradation caused by starvation and overwork. Men also tend to take on more dangerous tasks and, in this particular instance, the men were required to clear brush and engage in heavy labor before reaching Truckee Lake, adding to their physical debilitation. Those traveling with family members had a higher survival rate than bachelor males, possibly because family members more readily shared food with each other.

But ignorant retard HBDer (redundancy) Derbyshire extrapolates from that that “the general truth that women survive better than men in most lethal scenarios” and that somehow then women would be better suited to survive combat-like scenarios.  Remember, HBD makes you stupid.

Asians once again behaving exactly like Negroes and other “people of color.”  Colored is as colored does.


The Asian embrace of Color.  Asians hate, hate, hate Whites – never forget it.


Related to that truth: Rizzo comes down, thanks to the pan-Colored alliance of Asians and Blacks.

Question: In the Silker dream of Chinese girls with guns guarding the borders of the West, will the Chinese actually facilitate the Black-Brown Global South invasion of Europe?  After all, the Coloreds need to stick together: it’s their rising tide after all!


But, but, but…I thought that southerners like Italians were high in “anxiety” (as well as “neurosis”); now we are told that Finns are high in anxiety because they are cold-adapted northerners?  HBD…the gift that keeps on giving!


Some White folks.

Stupid Derbyshire: 10/11/17

Another incoherent quota queen.

Read this nonsense.

Just like Derbyshire debated Taylor on miscegenation (it’s all good, according to the Derb, at least for him, and if you don’t like it, come to his house and he’ll punch you in the face – his essential position), he is now opposing Taylor on racial separation: No Sale, says Derb, it’s impossible, simply impossible.

Hmmm…why would a White male (not man) married to a Chinese woman with half-Chinese children, oppose the idea of people in America actually separating, in a political sense, on the basis of race?  Just like we can productively speculate why such a person would be so opposed to criticism of miscegenation.  Just like we know why he insists the major racial dividing line is Blacks vs. non-Blacks as opposed to Whites vs. non-Whites.  We just can’t acknowledge the bizarre alien nature of Mrs. Derbyshire and the kids now, can we?

Anyway, and predictably, Derbyshire’s self-interested position is incoherent.  He’s all for “freedom of association” don’t you know (so, we can be free to eschew him and his family?), but actual separation is “no sale” because Blacks need Whites

Derbyshire:

Of that fraction of blacks with something on the ball, all but the most saintly and self-sacrificing will decamp to the nearest nonblack area, as you see happening today across the Mediterranean. Jared’s white enclaves are going to need some very serious border control. His proposed multicultural enclave, where people who want diversity can enjoy it, will get way less diverse really fast. It’ll just turn black.
There is simply no stable solution here. Whites don’t need blacks, but blacks need whites, if they are to have any kind of civilized life.
Jared’s second clip is similarly flawed, even setting aside the mayhem that attended the breakup of Yugoslavia. The racial gap in what was formerly Soviet Central Asia is nowhere near the size it is between American blacks and nonblacks.
So, sorry to Jared and those of his followers who emailed in, but on the matter of separation: no sale.
I do, though, fully agree with Jared on the desirability of striking down all legal constraints on private freedom of association. Forced racial integration is an outrageous assault on our liberties.
With freedom of association restored there would, I believe, be enough voluntary separation to lower the racial temperature and ease us forward to the calm acceptance of reality that the race issue so badly needs.

Look, if Blacks need Whites, and if we cannot have racial separation because there is no way to keep Blacks out (but doesn’t Derbyshire think that Europe can and should prevent the migrant invasion?), then how can we have freedom of association?  Blacks are going to want to live in the “non-Black” areas formed by “voluntary separation.”  How are you going to keep them out?  You can strike down “legal constraints on private freedom of association” but you still need some way to ENFORCE that separation.  If Blacks start coming into Derb’s pristine White-Yellow neighborhood paradise, what’s the solution? Call the police?  The National Guard?  Will law enforcement be segregated as well?

The other incoherent aspect of Derbyshire’s stupidity is his idea that we can have racial peace if we can all just accept HBD race realism and enjoy our voluntary separation and “cool down the racial temperature.”  As if Blacks, with their militancy and low intelligence and inflated self-esteem (all HBD-approved factoids, no?), will just accept being viewed as dumb and violent sub-altern Americans and if they would just accept being eschewed by “voluntary separation.”

Just like Sailer’s citizenism fails because it is no more realistic than racial nationalism (Trump’s citizenism didn’t last past the election) and won’t accomplish anything, Derbyshire’s idea that acceptance of racial differences and freedom of association will solve the race problem is ludicrous.

Derbyshire’s position is self-contradictory, and is reflective of his personal situation, his cognitive deficiency, or both.

Der Movement in the News, 9/13/16

Stupidities abound.


I guess macho man Derbyshire is now gonna shoot dem dere racycis who come to his door rather than punch them in the face.  I mean, this guy is so comically ludicrous it is actually cringe worthy.  It’s embarrassing.

Note to Derbyshire: decaying race-mixers, aging Chinatrices, and smug Hapas are not the only ones who know how to fire a gun.  If you want peace, prepare for war, indeed.  


So now White nationalism is being conflated with a bunch of juvenile jackasses and their moronic snark with a cartoon frog.  And I don’t even want to know who or what the hell “Kek” is.  Thanks a lot Alt-Right.  This is one small example of what I’ve been warning about. Grow up, for godssakes.