Category: law

Justice for Michael Douglas

Not the actor.

In response to this, I say: hey, Laura, given the dark stain in your past, why don’t you just shut your filthy mouth?  Instead of making excuses for the young man you killed, why don’t you come clean, after all these years, about it?  Were you driving drunk? Why no sobriety test?  Did you harbor a grudge against the victim?  Was it all really an accident?  Inquiring minds want to know.

Laura Bush is an enigma wrapped in another enigma. She is shy, beautiful, bookish, and in 1963, she blew through a stop sign and killed a guy. It was probably an accident. Perhaps it was simply youthful recklessness. Or maybe, just maybe… it was murder. Join Mrs. Bush for this intimate evening of reminiscences: of her childhood in Texas, of her marriage to George W. Bush, and of their rapid ascent to the very pinnacle of world power. Don’t miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get up close and personal with the woman behind the Decider.

You know, there is no statute of limitations on murder.  Nothing stops authorities from reopening the Michael Douglas case to see if there is any evidence to put before a grand jury.  It can be done right now.  It should be done right now.  Why not?  If there is nothing wrong there, if there is nothing to hide, why not reopen the case and put all questions to rest?  Speaking of rest: Can Michael Douglas finally rest in peace?

Justice for Michael Douglas!

Advertisements

Bunker Syndrome Redux

An example of leftist hypocrisy as well.

Some time ago, I wrote about “The Bunker Syndrome,” an affliction that characterizes many Whites of rightist inclinations. You have White folks with healthy instructs about race and culture, but they are unwilling to actually do anything productive about it.  Rather than attempting to actualize their beliefs in the real world, and engage in activism, they’ll just spout some “bigoted” remarks, or “act out” in public, accomplishing nothing except making themselves (and others who share their beliefs) look bad.

Let’s consider this situation.  Yes, a New York lawyer named “Aaron Schlossberg” raises questions as to his ancestry – or should we say (((ancestry))) – but that’s irrelevant to the main issues at hand.  Ignore that Levantine possibility for the time being, and let’s look at this through the paradigm prism of “a ‘White’ person making rightist, politically incorrect comments.”

Now, the persecution of Schlossberg is wrong, but his behavior is a perfect example of The Bunker Syndrome – lots of loud “acting out” of “bigoted” opinions but no actualization of his views in the real world.  Indeed, we read, emphasis added:

The website for Schlossberg says he is a lawyer with a focus on commercial and insurance law and notes that he speaks Spanish and some French, Mandarin Chinese and Hebrew, in addition to English. His law office advertises that it can take phone calls in four foreign languages, an irony that was not lost on many commentators on social media.

If Mr. Schlossberg feels so strongly about the sanctity of public English speaking, then perhaps his law office should only have accepted phone calls in that language?  More to the point, if he feels so strongly about immigration, illegal immigration, immigration enforcement, rightist politics, and cultural preservation, then, instead of public displays of Bunkerism, he could have used his legal training to help those on the Right, instead of practicing “commercial and insurance law” for a “vibrant” clientele.  Even if he didn’t want to help any “anti-Semitic Nazis” there are those on the Right who would welcome him – indeed, the Alt Wrong would much prefer a New York lawyer named “Aaron Schlossberg” over some greasy low-IQ Afrowop or some Romanian dancing the hora (long may it turn).  Then there is the whole Alt Light, the Paleocons, and the Donald Cuck administration.  There’s a wide range of opportunities for someone with legal training to help the Right, instead of acting like a jackass in a restaurant.

This is the problem with all the “Bunkers.” They’ll say this or that but not actually DO anything productive in the political or metapolitical sphere to advance their beliefs.  In fact, their “acting out” typically has the consequences (apart from harming themselves) of delegitimizing their beliefs and generating (undeserved) sympathy for the targets of their ire.  They are not even helping to promote racial balkanization, since their behavior is a dead end resulting in the aforementioned sympathy for their targets, and embarrassment for those who share their basic beliefs.  There is no real “heightening of the contradictions” here.  That Black guy who walked into a restaurant with a MAGA hat and got harassed actually did more to promote balkanization than did Schlossberg yelling about calling ICE on some Spanish speakers.

In comment threads in articles about Schlossberg, one sees the typical leftist mantra that spews forth when anyone with rightist sympathies is subjected to oppressive social pricing: “free speech has consequences” and “free speech protections of the First Amendment only refer to a lack of government persecution and have nothing to do with private consequences” etc.  These same leftist hypocrites (redundancy) were silent however when Fresno State claimed an inability to discipline NEC land whale Jarrar due to…drum roll please…free speech and the First Amendment.  And keep in mind Jarrar’s antics not only included the public comments about “amazing racist” Barbara Bush but also the incident with the ASU hotline number.  Consequences for any of that?  Absolute zero. Consequences for Schlossberg expressing his private opinion in a private setting?  Kicked out of his office and having elected officials submitting complaints for him to be disbarred.  

There are some on the Left who call those on the Far Right “hypocrites” on the free speech issue because, as they say, “if you guys were in charge, you wouldn’t allow free speech.”  Of course, leftists accusing others of hypocrisy is breathtaking….well, hypocrisy, as well as an insane level of projection.  But as to the “accusation?”  Fair enough…if I were in power, I wouldn’t allow free speech for the Left; they would be silenced just as they now silence the Right.  But it is not “hypocrisy” because a Sallis State would not pretend to be a “democracy” with a “First Amendment” and would not engage in dishonorable cant about “freedom” to justify interfering with the sovereignty of other nations. A Sallis State would also not cherry-pick law enforcement nor would it engage in cowardly techniques of social pricing (also applied in a cherry-picked, inconsistent manner) in order to evade the letter and spirit of the law.

The Left does not respect freedom of expression in the context of a “democracy” centered on a “Bill of Rights” (and Europe is even worse).  So, why should they expect the Far Right to respect freedom of expression in a national socialist authoritarian state?  Are they delusional or merely retarded?

In any case: if there are rightist lawyers (or other useful professionals) out there, please learn from the Schlossberg case.  We don’t need more Archie Bunkers.  The Bunkers didn’t save America from being transformed and destroyed.  We don’t need you spouting off in a restaurant, we need you in a courtroom (or wherever your skills can be best utilized) advocating for the Right.

More SLC News

In Der News.

Primate Negress and Neo-Marxist legal group censors Spencer.  I despise the Alt Right for making a mockery of racial activism, but I support their free speech rights, and would certainly choose Spencer to support over some alien Africaness.

Spencer and company have legitimate grounds to sue, tortious interference for starters; if this censorship is targeted only to pro-White groups, leaving alone Colored extremists, then extending the interference to discriminatory grounds is possible.

The objection would be: no money for lawyers.  Yes, keep on giving the lion’s share of “movement” money to keep the Happy Penguins and Latrine Flies Derbyshire living well, that’s the ticket, right?  There IS money, it’s just not going to Spencer and other hard-liners.  Whose fault is that?  Blame yourselves, Der Movement rank-and-file.  Another objection: can’t find a lawyer. If Der Movement had taken the advice, given, literally, for decades (two of them in my case), from some people to first build an infrastructure (including a designated legal team) and then engage in public hijinks, this situation would not exist.  Spencer needs to get back online first, second, needs to successfully deal with the lawfare suits targeting him, and then really needs to concentrate on infrastructure building – Richard, you need more folks on your side wearing suits and ties in courtrooms and fewer morons dressed like Captain America in the streets of Charlottesville.

Jewliani believes that “men are disposable” (including him?), but Milady Mantis Head Ivanka is untouchable.  I guess that’s the “fundamental premise” in action. I note that Rudy’s pussy pedestalization hasn’t prevented him from careening from one failed marriage to another.

So, we need a “big tent” strategy, but Charlottesville failed because it was open to the entire Right? Basically: whatever Spencer does is wrong.  Hypocrisy: it’s good that people don’t “shut down” Johnson when he criticizes them; on the other hand, if someone criticizes Johnson, he bans them from his website.  Fair point about GoDaddy – but that’s the price of affirmative action, no prudence, no planning, no common sense. Johnson is also correct about comments sections, including the legal implications. Johnson is also correct about free speech, consistent with my thoughts on this matter.

Is (as Johnson asserts) Taylor doing a service by dividing Jews by being pro-Jewish?  What about dividing Whites by being anti-White ethnic?  My problem with Amren in regard to this is not that they are Jew-friendly.  After all, they’ve been that way even when I was writing for them, and I accepted it as a strategic approach similar to what Johnson is talking about.  My problem is with them being pro-Jewish and at the same time anti-White ethnic.  And all the “yellow supremacist” talk just adds to it; in other words, Jews and Asians are considered high caste and White ethnics are low caste (in the case of the swarthoids, untouchables).  It’s the double standard that’s the problem.  If you are going to be accepting of Jews and avoid any and all criticism of Jews, then probably you should extend the same courtesy to all of the native peoples of Europe.  It’s not “White advocacy” to value Levantines and Orientals over Europeans.

Jewish “WNs” driven away from Amren because of MacDonald, as per Cofnas?  Nonsense.  The rabbi left because his Jewish school gave him a choice – us or them.  The other Jews left after the Duke-Hart dust-up, blame that on Duke and Hart, not MacDonald.  Finally, the Jews in Amren were destructive: Hart promoting a multiracial “White separatist state” or Levin saying that racial preservation for its own sake is “insane,” or Weissberg promoting the “racial status quo.”  And one can only imagine where Derbyshire got the “latrine flies” insult from.

Johnson hates snobs?  The lack of self-awareness is amazing.  And the supporter of intra-European ethnic cleansing denounces “imperialism” and “genocide.”  And is “drinking and drugs” really the worst “degeneracy” in the “movement?”

Robert Griffin goes semi-Nordicist.  It was just a matter of time, I guess.  Does he really think that the System supports White ethnics and is only against Nordics?  


Sailer cites 23andMe stupidities.

This retardation manifests when people start taking seriously low percentage results – I’m 4.2% this or 0.2% that – seriously, particularly at the 50% confidence rating that’s the default setting at the site.  Needless to say, the “timing the date of admixture” feature is equally ludicrous.  What’s going on with 23andMe is the same principle as Der Movement’s stupidities on race: turning legitimate science into trashy garbage tends to delegitimize the legitimate science, because the run-of-the-mill idiot is unable to distinguish science from trash.  So, biological race is real, population genetics can be interesting, and genetic kinship is fundamental to genetic interests.  But then people look at 23andMe nonsense, get confused, angry, misled, and/or disgusted, and then think the whole idea of racial genetics is nonsense, rather than the company’s product itself.  Likewise, racial science is real, and racial history is real, but Der Movement makes a mockery of it with HBD and Kempism, so many people get disgusted once they realize how they’ve been misled. Instead on turning against HBD or Kemp, they instead turn to “spiritual race” theories, like Yockey and Evola did when confronted with the nonsense of their time (Guntherism and calipers).

Internal Refugees?

The next liberal cause celebre?

The more rational of White leftist “progressives” should be wary of their enthusiastic defense of the “international law” assertion of the (virtually unlimited) rights of refugees to migrate and the equally expansive obligations of (White) nations to host them.

How about applying the same standards to internal refugees, officially called “internally displaced persons?”

Such people are not currently “legally” considered refugees, but, like anything else, properly applied SJW hysteria, Jewish activism, pressure groups, media campaigns, etc. – the whole System acting in concert – can change that.  

Imagine if “internally displaced persons” are given all the rights of international refugees.  Why, perhaps, White liberals in their gated communities and in their leafy blue state suburbs will be legally obligated to take in some ghetto Negro refugees from the inner city, Negro migrants fleeing the “urban warfare” of, say, Detroit and Chicago.  Open your doors wide!

Even more painful for the liberals would be if White bigots fleeing urban colored violence would be considered refugees, and the homes of White liberals had to be opened to take in the great unwashed of bad-White racists.  Not to worry, though, no chance of that scenario, just like, for example, White South Africans are mysteriously not accorded the same rights, and welcomed as refugees, as are Middle Easterners or Africans.

But the first scenario?  Forced racial integration and abrogation of White property rights, and the even more pernicious abrogation of private freedom of association (public being lost long ago), under the guise of “refugee rights?”  Not only possible, but increasingly likely, given continued and unabated SJW hysteria, Colored Privilege, and White cowardice.

You read it here first!

This is the lesson of the schoolyard: If someone is bullied and refuse to stand up for themselves and refuse to fight back, then they WILL be bullied continuously, without end.  However, if they do stand up for themselves and do fight back, get their licks in, do some damage to their opponent, then, even if they lose, it is unlikely that they will be bullied again.  Bullies tend to be cowards and look for easy prey, they look for those will won’t fight back. In other words, cowardly bullies target cowardly victims.

Whites as a race are akin to a cowardly bullied pansy who doesn’t fight back, won’t stand up for himself, and is therefore marked as easy pickings.  Whites being bullied to now accept feral coloreds as obligatory internal refugees would be just another example of White uselessness and cowardice.

But, perhaps, just perhaps, the Trump election was just the tip of the iceberg, and at some point, especially after being disappointed and betrayed by the globohomo milksop cuck Trump, there will be a growing White backlash that will make Trumpism seem like a mild political hiccup.

Who knows?  

Only time will tell.

The Dying Alt Right and Other News

News. Satire. It’s all one.

Is the Alt Right dying?

It is more and more looking like Sallis is going to be right once again, as I’ve repeatedly predicted that the fever dream (nightmare) of the Alt Right is going to end, sooner or later, but the speed of the collapse is even taking me by surprise.  The loss of Bristow is devastating, absolutely devastating.

And of course the anti-White scum crow in delight:

“Everyone in the alt-right is a malignant contrarian,” Lenz said about the growing divisions in their movement following the united front the alt-right displayed in Charlottesville. “They come from a culture where insults are the coin of the realm.”

But, but, but…I thought it was only “White Nationalism 1.0” that could be so categorized?  Oh wait, I was right about this as well, although that’s nothing, the equivalent of “being right” about stating that “the sun will rise tomorrow morning.”

The association of “the movement” with the Alt Right means that racial nationalism in America will be damaged (once again!) by this latest fiasco, proving right those who warned that a too-close association with racial nationalism with one relatively juvenile and inept faction will be the downfall of any progress made as a result of Trumpian chaos and balkanization.

Leave it to our fearless leaders to go from the (admittedly overwrought) euphoria of November 2016 to the grim ashes of March 2018.

I guess that whole Legion Europa thing looks at least a little bit better in hindsight, no?  But of course that project wouldn’t do, would it.  It just didn’t have “all the trimmings,” so to speak, right?

Enjoy the collapse. It’s a long way down.  

And you have no one to blame but yourselves.  A “movement” based on Type I leaders and Type I followers, in today’s age of 24/7 media coverage, social media, heightened analysis, sophisticated police state tactics, well-funded “watchdog groups,” organized Far-Left domestic terrorists enabled by TrumpCuck and HowdySessions, is destined to fail.  What’s needed is less Type I empty bravado and more Type II cunning and planning.

Read this.

My understanding of the situation is that this woman used her own photograph on her pseudonymous activist social media account, used a pseudonym that was slightly different from her real name (Tiana Dalichov vs. Dayanna Volitich), and discussed detailed aspects of her IRL job while essentially indirectly taunting her employers (Agreed with a guest that white supremacists need to infiltrate schools and become teachers and said, “I’m absolutely one of them.” Said on her podcast that she had put on a “dog and pony” show for administrators, telling her students that when administrators showed up, “I’m going to be different than I usually am. I just don’t want you to be shocked, I want you to play along.”).

So, yes, I agree, that must have been satire.  I mean, a serious activist with a podcast and a social media account wouldn’t have done all of that, would they?  Well, Der Movement as a whole is satire, so how could anyone tell the difference?

I’ve written about this before, but I would be a strong supporter of Pierce’s “table-leg therapy” theory if I was not such a committed pacifistic humanist. Emphasis added:

Table-leg Therapy
Senator Fulbright and the Reverend Berrigan are still on the wrong side of every issue except Palestine, and they are on the right side of that issue for the wrong reasons.
In other words, liberals — including the consistent ones — are just as sick as ever and just as dangerous to the future of America as ever. The only way the great majority of them will get their thinking straight, eventually, is with a sturdy, oak table leg applied smartly and repeatedly alongside the head.
Nevertheless, the present dissension in liberal ranks is of inestimable value. It is the most fervent and influential of the liberals who are now taking an anti-Zionist position, and their numbers and influence are growing daily.

Can we skip the optional Asian (girl) friend?

But, but, but…the great and good Desmond Jones says that Italy is absolutely ethnically homogenous and will remain so until the end of time, forever and ever, amen.

Solution: these Nigerians are actually Sicilians.  It’s the mafia after all, and, as we know, real Nigerians are actually lighter-complexioned, more gracile, and racially more European than are the Sicilian Afrowops.

Run Silent, Run Deep: Helping the Community

Good news and bad news, and some constructive criticism.

The good news: some “movement” Nutzis understand the importance of community organizing and community outreach.

The bad news: they not only do it ineptly, but they broadcast it to the enemy.

Lesson: Never, EVER, have Type I activists monopolizing leadership positions in ANY racialist group, strategy, tactic, or endeavor. NEVER, EVER. For godssakes, do I have to draw you a picture?  You Do, and do QUIETLY, you don’t broadcast it at an early, embryonic stage. You don’t participate in blustering “interviews” with White-hating, anti-racist, yeastbucket shills.

Again, why is it that the allegedly “low-IQ, undisciplined, useless, low-time preference” Negro knows how to do community organizing correctly, and the White Superhero does not?

Some constructive criticism and suggestions:

The next time some idiot asks you for an interview, respond thus: “No thank you, I don’t have the time; I’m busy helping people.” Be discreet, don’t call attention to your actions.  It won’t stay undercover for long, but there’s a difference between word getting out because you are doing and accomplishing, and word getting out because hateful SJWs mock you publicly after you call attention to yourselves and invite the fox into the henhouse.

You should set up Euro-American help centers. These can be one or more on-site physical facilities and it can also be activists driving to meet those people who need help where they need it. Help real people – White people and White people only – who have real problems.  Don’t help those hostile to their race and our cause, but certainly do help apolitical normies who don’t know much about anything than their own life situation.  One doesn’t have to be on our side (at first) to get help – after all, there are so few of them – but certainly they should at least be neutral and not overly hostile. And of course, White activists should be helping each other.  By analogy with “god helps those who help themselves” we will be most effective in helping, and recruiting, White normies if we ourselves are all straightened out and doing well.  The same structures available for the normies can be used for activists.

Political education should be an integral part of the process, but it must be done prudently and patiently.  You do not want to be ham-fisted about it, pushing pamphlets (or websites) on people, wild-eyed, foaming-at-the-mouth, etc. Initially, it has to be about making a personal connection, establishing a rapport, and introducing the most basic ideas after that, all the time trying to connect those ideas to their personal issues, problems, and experiences. Of course, from the very beginning they should know who and what you are and what you stand for, be upfront about it.  They should know who it is who cares about them and wants to help them.  But be genuine in your desire to help, make that predominant at first, don’t use helping as a mere excuse to engage in Nutzi propaganda from the get-go.  If people think you are just humoring their problems, using that just in order to recruit them, they’ll be turned off and lost to you.

If possible, contact “movement”-connected lawyers to make sure your dot all your i’s and cross all your t’s especially in the event any activity may require that those you help sign liability waivers (or some other issue of which we may be initially unaware).  We who are racial activists need to pool our expertise to help each other do productive activities – those of us who are lawyers or doctors or plumbers of electricians or businessmen or scientists of mechanics or schoolteachers or soldiers or police or firemen or whatever – the expertise is out there.

What about the System co-opting your efforts?  Of course, the quieter and the more discreet you are about your efforts, the more you can forestall co-opting efforts.  However, more fundamentally, the best way to prevent co-opting is to offer something that cannot be precisely mimicked.  The System can certainly throw money and resources at a problem (if they wish to do so), but what they cannot do (and still be true to the System and its ideology) is to provide sincerity, authenticity, a genuine desire to help, the proper political education, and the ability to give Whites back their Identity and make them proud of that Identity. The System is more likely to send a bunch of condescending, arrogant, White-hating SJW blue hairs unable to establish a connection with the people they are supposed to help, and certainly unable to connect those people’s uplift with a positive self-image rooted in racial and cultural identity.  If you do it right, it cannot be co-opted; or to put it another way, if the System was able to precisely co-opt your efforts, then they’ll be working to spread pro-White activism.

And whatever you do, don’t engage in “movement” freakishness; real people with real problems don’t want to hear about “Savitri Devi” or “cephalic indices” or “Kali Yuga” or “subfractional admixture percentages” or “the men who can’t tell time” or “the racial provenance of Julius Caesar.”  Save that for the next “movement” circle jerk, and concentrate political education for “normies’ as the essentials.  Later, if they so wish, they can learn the esoterica.

And, again: don’t broadcast what you are doing to the System.

As the sub-mariners say: run silent, run deep.