Category: Legionary Movement

Anatomy of Error

A brief analysis.

I read this book long ago, when it first came out; it is very good, is recommended.  

What are some major errors in Der Movement?  What is the “anatomy of error” in (American) White racial activism?

Among many – reversing the strategic order of how things should be done.  Prudence dictates that you first thoroughly prepare for an action, build the required infrastructure, prepare for the enemy’s response and for other contingencies, and then you proceed.

Thus, first, you build an infrastructure, and then you go public with your rallies, protests, actions, and so forth.  If you want to provoke the System, you had better be prepared for the System’s reaction. What the “movement” does instead is have their rallies and protests and public meetings and violent outbursts with zero infrastructure there for support – zero legal teams, zero media structures, zero elected officials who are true fellow travelers, zero integration in the local community, zero economic self-sufficiency, zero strategy, and zero planning.

Ironically, all the representatives of big-brained European ethnies that are celebrated in the “movement” for their foresight and discipline behave worse than the most incompetent, undisciplined, and hare-brained gesticulating swarthoid.  Superiority is not a birthright, it has to be earned. And Der Movement and its failed leaders have earned nothing.

Let’s move on.  What can be done for young White men frustrated with the System, despairing of a pathetically failed “movement,” and tempted to ruin their lives by lashing out with sporadic violence against an entrenched overpowering System?

Besides taking my advice to concentrate on their own selves and well-being over all else – we need quality men, not broken boys – they need to be able to fit into a real movement that can give them a sense of purpose in an atmosphere of competence and manly collegiality (the latter of which is not effete Bronyism or homosexuals “flirting” with “cute” activists at “extreme vetted” meetings). I’ve long been an advocate of a Legionary-type structure, which would of course necessitate a real leadership and a real competence beyond that currently available in Der Movement.

For such an activity, real vetting and security are required.  Now, I’m not going to discuss what could and should constitute such vetting on a public forum, but I will give two examples of what such vetting should not be.  “Are you Swedish?” is insufficient as “extreme vetting.”  Having a Skype conversation in which you congratulate a candidate (in reality, an infiltrator) on their Northwest European heritage, while mocking Brooklyn Italian-Americans, also does not meet the standards of effective vetting and security.

It’s interesting, but in my analog, meat-space, IRL WN 1.0 days, there were zero instances (insofar as I am aware) of private meetings being infiltrated.  Now, public meetings were another story, operational security there was sub-standard, but at least the physical security was sound, so the outcome of public meeting infiltration was a bit of snooping (which admittedly was bad) and not violence.  But the private meetings were sound – thus, the WN 1.0 crowd, for all their faults, were a step ahead of WN 2.0. Thus, the lack of proper operational security is a major error of Der Movement today, and is in fact part of the infrastructure problem cited at the beginning of this post, since “opsec” is one of the most fundamental pillars upon which to build everything that follows.

Let’s consider the problem of freakishness and silliness. There are of course many divisions within the “movement.” Pan-Europeanism vs. ethnonationalism, pan-Europeanism vs. Nordicism, vanguardism vs .mainstreaming, Christianity vs. anti-Christians, ethnic fetishists and those who oppose them, etc. Readers know I have strong views on these topics that often clash with established “movement” dogma. But even when I oppose that dogma, at least I can understand it, I can see the points of the other side, and it is something within the realm of rational possibility.  It can be in some ways defensible through reasoned argument, even if I disagree ad make my own reasoned arguments against the memes I oppose.

However, when observing the current WN 2.0 fiasco, things occur that are so outlandish that I simply cannot understand how any ostensibly intelligent, sane, and rational activist can promote any of it. Yang Gang? Tulsi Coconut? The years of slavish Trump worship? Bronyism – My Little Pony, for godssakes!  I’m at a loss, completely at a loss.  WN 1.0 was a disaster, sure, but it was a disaster mitigated at least by an aura of seriousness, or at least semi-seriousness.  What we have now is like a bad comedy routine.

Thus, another constant error of the “movement” is the promotion of freakishness that has no direct connection whatsoever to racialism. For example, it is because of anti-science raving retards like this that we have a growing measles problem in the US. Some microbes are indeed just waiting for you.  Measles has a very high infectivity rate; if you are exposed and not immune, your probability of illness is close to 100%.  You can of course argue that filthy scum not getting their children vaccinated – and many of these in the current outbreak are Ultra-Orthodox Jews – is a sign of weakness (in this case mental), and I’ll agree with that. Leave it up to morons like “Stronza” and we would still have smallpox epidemics and folks in iron lungs from polio.  Pepe!  Kek!  Traditionalism!  We can bury those dead five year olds snug in our hobbit holes!

This completely superfluous stupidity damages the image of racialism to both the general public and to the science and technics types that we need as one component of our arsenal of human material. I’m not surprised that the affirmative action “leadership” doesn’t know any better. 

Coming full circle, we can mention another fundamental flaw of Der Movement, on par with reversing the order of organization (which should come first) and action (which should come after) – the inability to clearly and decisively define an ingroup. This is something I’ve written about often. The defining characteristic of any group is the decision of who is in and who is out.  Without a clearly defined and stable boundary of membership, there is no group.  That boundary needs to be decided BEFORE the group is formed, before people are recruited and action is taken. If there are going to be any changes in the composition of the group (changes which should be rare in any case), it always should be in the direction of greater inclusion – and if current members of the group object to that inclusion then they can voluntarily leave – freedom of association – and form their own groups with their own boundaries. But you cannot start redefining your ingroup for the purposes of exclusion after the fact, after people have been members for months or years (or even decades), investing their time, effort, money – their blood, sweat, and tears – their lives, for the group.  That’s not the time to tell them – “hey, we’ve reconsidered, you’re not part of the ingroup after all.”  

You’d think things like that should be obvious to the high born honorable superior big-brained heroic figures of Der Movement, but apparently not.

Advertisements

Common Sense Video

Good and bad points.

I have a mixed opinion of this video, which I urge all readers to watch. I have no problem at all with the first half, which is much in accord with things I have written here recently – that activists have to take care of themselves first and get their own life in order.  I would suggest that CSC study up on the Romanian Legionary movement, the concept of “the New Man,” as well as the “nest” system of small local activist groups of the larger organization. Codreanu realized that systems and slogans and intricate platforms of programs are all a house of cards without high quality men to back it all up. First, the New Man, and then the programs and propaganda. Der Movement reverses that – it thinks you can reach to heaven standing on a pile of shit.

The second half of the video was a bit more problematical.  In theory, I have no problem with his concrete suggestion about group formation, although even these “implicit” groups have to worry about infiltrators, and, of course, when they become explicit, this will be a serious problem.  I think he is in error thanking Greg Johnson, who essentially replied only to protect his own self-interests, not to be helpful. Telling young White men to join trash groups like IE/AIM, with their piss-poor security, abysmal leadership, and ethnic fetishism is also a mistake.  I view CSC as a sincere fellow who may be naïve about the realities of Der Movement.  Young activists are better off trying just to form their own groups, or waiting for something of quality, then investing themselves in the Disqus Warriors.

But, let’s give CSC credit. He answered Johnson.  He have ideas other than just “buy books from me and send me “D’Nations.”  

Some background about this person is here; he describes his journey to activism.

He seems like a good man, a sincere activist. I expect with time he’ll learn what Der Movement is really about. CSC is against toxic people, drugs, porno, and video games.  So, that essentially eliminates 95% of Der Movement and 100% of the Alt Right.

What this fellow doesn’t quite grasp is that if he believes – as he does – that our situation today is dire, and we are losing big, then isn’t the “movement” and its utter failure in large part responsible?  Der Movement didn’t begin with the Alt Right.  I never heard of this fellow before, since he apparently was involved more with conservatives, libertarians, etc.  On the other hand, I’ve been involved with hardcore Nutzism since the mid-90s.

And, my friend, by the mid-90s, the “movement” had been around for many decades.

For example, listen to this.  So much winning!  How did we reach this point?  And maybe Amren should have been talking about the ethnic motivations behind the ADL all along, and not about how terrible those hora-dancing Romanians are. I didn’t see any Romanian-American organizations at that hearing bashing White interests. I did see rat-faced Levantines though, Middle Easterners aplenty.

By the way, Paul, this has to be chalked up as a fail. It was painfully bad, the most boring and clumsy podcast I’ve ever listened to. No offense, but that’s the truth. You’re not ready to fly solo just yet.

Blackpill Friday

Der Friday.

Gee, even the Alt Lite is abandoning Antifa Don Trump.  Soon, all he’ll have left is Roissy’s fervid onanism… and all those Big Macs to eat.

Spencer is being rather Sallis-like in his latest tweets, with comments about Trump, the Alt Right, and the “let’s be run out of a LA bar by a bunch whose combined bench press is 10 lbs.” Proud Boys.

The absolutely despicable Brimelow continues to use his children as props for his money-making website.  And it seems that Sallis is the only one willing to call him out on it.  What an honorable “movement” indeed!  If you can learn anything from Codreanu and the Legionary movement, it is the importance of character, the need for “New Men” as more important than new memes or new programs or new dogmas. Until racial activism has quality people rather than money-grubbing grifters, it is not going anywhere productive.  But then, Codreanu was just some hora-dancing Romanian, and not a superior product like Brimelow, so move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here.

The System waves its hands around.

Dr. Myers and a colleague later found that presenting the data differently could produce a much less anxious reaction. In work published this spring, they found that the negative effects that came from reading about a white decline were largely erased when the same people read about how the white category was in fact getting bigger by absorbing multiracial young people through intermarriage.

Rewritten for analogical clarity:

Dr. Myers and a colleague later found that presenting the data differently could produce a much less anxious reaction. In work published this spring, they found that the negative effects that came from reading about a decline in the amount of white paint required to paint a house were largely erased when the same painters read about how the amount of available white paint was in fact getting bigger by absorbing black paint thrown into the white paint container by vandals.

After all, you increase the amount of something by destroying it.  Makes sense.  Don’t forget, paint color is purely socially constructed, and a home owner wanting their house painted white wouldn’t mind at all if it turns out to be gray instead. 

At this point, only Roissy finds this childish behavior amusing.

“This country is so much stronger now than it was when I took office that you wouldn’t believe it,” Trump continued. “I mean, you see it, but so much stronger that people can’t even believe it. When I see foreign leaders they say, ‘We cannot believe the difference in strength between the United States now and the United States two years ago.’ Made a lot of progress.”

I’m never going to let Der Movement forget that when they were spontaneously ejaculating over their “last chance for White America God Emperor” I was labeling him a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a race cuck fraud, and stated that the ONLY reason to vote for him is that the deranged public perception of Trump as a “racist fascist bigot” was wonderfully inflaming racial tensions.

Now, someone was right and someone was wrong.  As always.

As always.

Hora vs. Oktoberfest

The betrayal of the Legionary movement by Saint Adolf

Read this. Emphasis added:

In the same book are found innumerable passages which demonstrate German complicity in ousting the Legionary Movement in addition to the premeditation of the coup d’état. Germany found it easier to get along with General Antonescu than with the indomitable Legionary Movement. Thus, in the course of a visit with Hitler, in the midst of a discussion on the modem revolution, General Antonescu made the following remark:

“And what do you do with the fanatics, for it would be difficult to make a renovating movement without them?”

“You have to get rid of them,” replied Hitler without hesitation, and he smilingly threw the General a look of complicity. 

Hitler ended his exposition with these sentences:

The man who allows himself to be dispossessed of his command — and he stared at the General with insistence — proves that he does not know how to use a machine gun. A 20th century dictator cannot be overthrown. If he falls, it is because he committed suicide…

Back in Bucharest, Antonescu maintained absolute silence about the matters discussed during the fifteen minutes he spent alone with Hitler. The conversation which had taken place in the presence of witnesses gave the impression that he had gotten satisfaction as far as his conflict with the Legionary Movement was concerned…

January 22, 1941: Dawn of this day finds the military forces and the Legionnaires face to face. The military attacks buildings occupied by Legionnaires, the latter defend themselves. The clashes between the two belligerents seem more like a siege, in which the besieged are those who are accused of fomenting the rebellion and who defend themselves with whatever weapons they can find. It is a strange “rebellion” in which the supposed rebels choose not to attack and to avoid any conflict with the forces that besiege them.

There appears to be a kind of stabilization of positions and expectations of the two sides. In certain regions there is even collaboration between the army and the Legionnaires. Some local incidents have taken place in Bucharest, Braila and Prahova where several Legionnaires but no military fell. The most serious problem for General Antonescu arises on January 22, 1941, because of the attitude of the peasant masses. By the hundreds of thousands they begin to penetrate into the cities to help the besieged Legionnaires.

In the meantime, negotiations take place during the day between the German representative, Neubacher and Horia Sima for the cessation of hostilities. Result: The Legionary Movement agrees to stop all resistance. General Antonescu pledges not to take any action against the Legionary Movement or its militants. However, parallel to those negotiations, General Antonescu increases his intrigues, his accusations against the Legionnaires and his military offers to Hitler. All of those accusations only completed the series of calumnies made in Berlin against the Legion and worsened the Legionary position in Hitler’s eyes. Under those circumstances, nothing could be more natural than the order received during the night of January 22-23 by the German troops stationed in Romania to “… put themselves at the disposition of General Antonescu to crush the Legionary rebellion.”

Therefore, it was the Germans who determined the fate of General Antonescu’s coup d’état.

January 23, 1941: The troops being unable to rout the Legionnaires from the official buildings they occupy, General Antonescu gives the order to employ artillery against them. At the same time, the troops in the Capital receive orders to fire into the crowd of passers-by who are automatically considered as partisans of the Legionary Movement. Several hundred who had nothing to do with politics or the Legionary Movement were killed. These were premeditated actions which were to be charged to the Legionary Movement and presented to the Germans as undisciplined and unconscionable actions on the part of the Legionnaires.

And yet, at dawn, Horia Sima had ordered that the resistance cease and that the buildings be evacuated. It should be pointed out that in many cases, the public buildings occupied by the Legionnaires were first turned over to the German army, which then turned them over to Romanian military authorities so that all possibility of conflict would be entirely avoided.

The pact accepted by Horia Sima and General Antonescu before the German diplomat was categorical: total liberty for Legionnaires. Nonetheless, that pact was not respected by the General, nor even considered by the Germans. A few hours after the Legionnaires’ capitulation, General Antonescu gave the order for repression. The enactment of that repression’ registered several hundred killed and tens of thousands arrested. The Legionary Movement entered a new phase of persecution.

April 9, 1941: Horia Sima, leader of the Legionary Movement, arrives in Berlin as an ordinary refugee.

April 18, 1941: The Legionary refugees in Germany are informed that they will be confined from then on to compulsory quarters in certain areas (Rostock, Berkenbruck, etc.) as a result of agreements between the German and Romanian governments.

Absolutely disgusting.  Meanwhile today, Europe as a whole is betrayed by Mama Merkel, while the sweaty fetishists have the nerve to run hit pieces against the Romanian people in places like Amren. I’ll take the Romanians any day.

Political Socialism

Different from economic.

I am a Political Socialist, which is completely different from an Economic Socialist.  The latter is what most people consider “socialist” – that is, nationalization of all industries, full distribution of wealth, opposition to a market economy (in favor of a command economy), all on the “happy road” to communism – and with implications of leftist views on race, culture, and society.  Political Socialism is more associated with the Far Right – Spengler, Yockey, the National Socialism of Hitlerism, the National Christian Socialism of Codreanu, the corporatism of Italian Fascism, etc.  Political Socialism is the organizing of society for the good of the nation and people, it puts the good of the whole above that of the individual, it is more on the collectivist spectrum than are the hyper-individualist “Western” societies of today, it wishes to bring all social and economic classes of a people into accord and ease divisions between them.  Above all, Political Socialism asserts that the purpose of the Economy is to serve the interests of Nation and People, as opposed to Political Capitalism that believes that all – including National and People – must serve the interests of the Economy.

Thus, Political Socialism is compatible with supply and demand, a mixed “capitalist” economy, a free market – although not free to the extent of laissez faire, and all the rest.  However, the nation state is the ultimate arbiter based on the good of the people; the economy is not the ultimate arbiter; when national-racial-cultural issues demand economic concessions than that is what happens, and not the opposite.  In Political Socialism the Economy is the servant of Nation and People, not vice versa. Political Socialism does oppose great differences in wealth in the population, as that erodes the organic solidarity of Nation and People, and, certainly for those wealthy who betray Nation and People, things will not go well for them in a Political Socialist state.  They can expect their assets seized, and they, if not executed, would serve as manual laborers somewhere, in the most meek and modest circumstances possible.  They will no longer be Master; the era of Economic Man will come to an end.  Needless to say though, class warfare as promoted by Economic Socialists also, to an equal extent to Unrestrained Capitalism, erodes the organic solidarity required of any great people, and so those who promote that Marxist creed will find things not going well for them either.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

A few examples of the spectrum of the “movement” and reactions to it.

First, the Good:

Codreanu speech.

Analysis of the Legionary movement.

Nice head gear on the groom.

Now, the Bad: the newest VDARE HBDer, the execrable fanboy Welton (emphasis added):

So, clearly, intelligence is the simplest explanation for most empirical evidence pf pathology.

Yes, and it is the simplest explanation for spelling errors as well.

Northeast Asians and Jews—even though they’re just as likely to be victims of racism…

Poor Asians and Jews tormented as they are by nasty racists in America.  Innocent, pure as freshly laid snow, these high-IQ supermen can save themselves from exposure to knuckle-dragging Euro-brutes by going back to Asia and Israel (in Asia as well, by the way), respectively.

…—do not display the same behavior patterns because they have high intelligence, meaning they do quite the opposite of what races with low intelligence do.

Never, never forget the fundamental basis of HBD: Jews and Asians have a high, high-IQ, and are your natural masters and betters.  All kneel before the Altar of Asia, and prostrate yourself before the Holy Yarmulke.

This model explains all the evidence. 

All, all, all!   And if, you know, reality contradicts HBD, we’ll just wave our hands around and try to explain away reality.

So it is amazing—considering that three of Benner’s five co-authors are Northeast Asians: Yishan Chen, Yijie Wang and Yen-Pi Cheng—that nobody thought of it.

Not so “amazing” when you consider that your Holy Orientals HATE White people, and will eagerly grasp on to, and promote, any theory that blames Whitey for Black and Hispanic deficiencies.  The Rising Tide of Color needs “high-IQ” leadership, and Jews and Asians are always ready and willing to oblige!

The issue of “depression” can be explained by the way that low IQ indirectly predicts depression, due to the fact that low IQ leads you into poverty, unemployment, relationship and friendship breakdown, drug abuse, alcoholism, poor health and thus general misery.

Sure!  Of course, HBD also tells us that Negroes have higher self-esteem, and lower suicide rates, than do Whites.  Don’t expect any consistency from HBDers – it’s a religious faith, a political movement, all dedicated to enslaving Whites to Jews and Asians.

By contrast, Northeast Asians are prone to depression for mainly genetic reasons and in spite of their tendency, in Western countries, to achieve high socioeconomic status. Evolved to extremely harsh yet predictable ecologies, their ancestors could only survive in tightly bonded groups. This meant that you had to be able to get on with everybody, or you’d be cast out into the cold to die. This selected in favor of strong social anxiety, which is adaptive because it means that you are concerned about the future. However, this can become overwhelming, leading to depression and suicide.

Can we ever imagine a more perfect example of a “just so” story?  Paging Rudyard Kipling!

Finally, the Ugly.

Look how communists and anarchists have degraded the beautiful Mota-Marin memorial, and consider modern official Spanish attitudes toward it. How about moving it to Romania?  You know, to all those deficient non-Westerners (according to the HBDers) dancing the hora (long may it turn)?

Race-mixers in Der Movement.

Another unbalanced Type I quota queen.

Diversity is a strength:

Behold the God Emperor

MAGA: Make Africans Great Again

Der Movement: (Taylor) Swiftly Humiliated

Taylor and Trump: the Left triumphant.

The Type I retards of Der Movement are publicly humiliated once again.  How’s your “Aryan Princess,” doing these days, eh?  How’s that “Aryan Alt Right Avatar?”  And I love how some of these nitwits are pretending (channeled through “Milo” and Anglin) that it all really never happened – you see, their years-long sweaty obsession over this fox-faced female yeastbucket “cuck nagger” was just a “jest” you see, a “joke,” a “meme” never meant to be taken seriously.  Sure.  Sure.  That’s like some beta male who proposes marriage to a woman in public, and is then humiliated when she ever-so-publicly rejects him, and then he protests, red-faced, that it was “all just a joke.”

No, Type Is – you indulged in your fetishes and stupidities, and were head-smacked by reality once again.  Der Movement: a story of continuous failure.  And I note that the various “movement” sites – except for Anglin – that have been obsessing over Swift for years are strangely silent about this news story – can’t admit being wrong, I suppose.  No surprise there. And as to the argument that “this isn’t important, who cares?” – I could have asked “who cares about Taylor Swift?” for the past several years.  No, Der Movement themselves made it a big deal with their Beavis-and-Butthead jackassery, setting themselves up for yet another morale-deflating public humiliation.  It’s the public perception of the Far Right being shown to be immature, wrong, and once again scorned by an idol, that is most important issue here – The Yeastbucket on White Unicorn Syndrome in this case.  Fail, fail, fail – Der Movement is synonymous in the public mind with endless failure.  That’s a surefire way to get high-quality recruits, no doubt!

And, no, by the way, contra the obsessives and fetishists, Swift is not a “HB10” – are you kidding me?  She’s just some lanky (likely high-T) ditzy female, who paints herself up to look presentable in public. Maybe a 7 on a good day.

Roissy:

Threads are tied, chess pieces are maneuvered into place, rope is knotted…the Deep State actors who attempted a silent coup of President Trump are about to face their reckoning.

Er, no.  Instead, it are Trump’s own supporters who are facing a reckoning, emphasis added:

Starting with the President’s own inauguration, antifa have rioted—attacking political enemies, threatening politicians, and sparking street brawls. By the group’s own admission, its purpose is to use violence against opponents. And yet, in a purported crackdown on “serial rioters,” Jeff Sessions’ Justice Department skipped over antifa and indicted members of a little-known right-wing group called the Rise Above Movement (RAM).

Last week, the US Attorney for the Western District of Virginia, Thomas Cullen—a Trump Administration appointee—held a press conference to celebrate bringing charges, including “conspiracy to riot,” against four RAM members. “They were essentially serial rioters,” said Mr. Cullen. “This wasn’t in our view the lawful exercise of First Amendment rights. These guys came to Charlottesville to commit violent acts.”

This latest indictment follows in the spirit of S.J. Res 49, passed unanimously by the Republican Congress in September 2017, which called on the President to use all available means to combat the “hate groups” that brawled in Charlottesville. It specifically mentioned white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, and neo-Nazis—but not antifa.

To his credit, President Trump attached a signing statement saying he did not blame a specific group for the violence, thus sticking to his contention that there was blame on both sides—but this appears to have had no influence on his own Justice Department. Instead, antifa remains in the clear while its enemies are arrested. White advocates don’t want special treatment. We want equitable enforcement of the law. We certainly haven’t seen it yet.

Who was it who has made a big deal about Trump signing S.J. Res 49 (his attached “statement” being irrelevant)?  Who has been harping about Trump betraying his own supporters?  That’s right, Sallis – while Roissy obsesses about how Trump shakes hands with Macron, and while Der Movement swoons over their obese “God Emperor.”    And while Derbyshire and Coulter praise Antifa Jeff Sessions, it has been Sallis who has been beating the drum about how the Trump DOJ is viciously anti-White.

Let’s see now: Sallis right, Der Movement wrong.  Who would have ever guessed?

By the way, this underscores why creating a Legionary-type movement – which I support and have proposed – will be so difficult in America.  The Ultra Far Left Trump-Sessions axis will use all the power of the federal government to crush it. Such a movement would have had an easier time getting established under a regime of a President farther to the right than Trump – Obama, for example.

Trump’s adipose tissue must be inducing record levels of estrogen production – enough to promote the blossoming of puberty in a busload of 13 year old girls.  Or is it that he’s just a White-hating Neo-Marxist?

Trump has Taylor Swift-Boated Der Movement once again.  Instead of the God Emperor, he’s the Red Emperor – a Far Left Marxist paragon.