Category: libertarianism

Happy Saint Adolf Day 2018

SLC News.

“World Brotherhood of Europeans” – excluding Afrowops and Romanohorians of course.

Did you ever notice that:

***When Americans fight wars that benefit Jews (e.g., WWII, any of the Middle Eastern wars that benefit Israel), then veterans are good and noble, and popular culture fetishizes veteran worship; however, when Americans fight wars that Jews disapprove of (e.g., Vietnam or even the entire “Cold War” military endeavor), then veterans are despicable “baby killers” to be scorned, while anti-war protesters and draft dodgers are lionized.  Funny, that.  It’s almost as if the entire American culture is modulated to reflect Jewish concerns and Jewish views. 

***In a typical modern American classroom, half the students have attention deficit disorder and the other half have a peanut allergy.  And most are overweight.

More SLC News:

The Alt Right’s “generational warfare” is ludicrous from my perspective for many reasons, foremost among them is that virtually every White Millennial I have known (many in fact) is not only an extreme leftist, but they all are hysterically ultra-SJW extreme leftists, oozing with the most virulent anti-White attitudes imaginable.  Boomers may be cucked cowards, but many (most?) Millennials are open enemies.

Read this.

The roots of what we now call the Alt-Right lay in the Ron Paul movement.

And that is why the Alt Right is doomed to fail.  It was tainted by libertardism from the very beginning.

Read this, emphasis added (from the original book):

….the degree of genetic differentiation among Indian jati groups living side by side in the same village is typically two to three times higher than the genetic differentiation between northern and southern Europeans.

Let’s unpack that for a moment.  Typically, population genetics tells us that the greatest genetic differentiation in Europe is along the north/south axis, being a bit larger than east/west; the first axis in PCA is north/south, the second is east/west.  However, that differentiation, the north/south, in Europe is two to three times smaller than that between Indian brownster “micro-castes” who live “side by side in the same village.”  

Chuck the gamester pussy pedestalizer.

Der Movement in the News, 8/29/16

Der Movement marches on.

Coming from Derbyshire of all people, here is a note (emphasis added) of interest to the good and great Sir Desmond Jones, who asserts with complete confidence that Italy is, and shall remain, 100% racially (and ethnically) homogeneous to the ends of time, forever and ever, amen:

The current focus of attention for the ongoing invasion of Europe is Italy. In the month of July twenty-five thousand illegals arrived in Italy from Africa. Twenty-five thousand in one month. And that was a twelve percent increase on July last year.

Put it another way, that would be 300,000 a year, although the numbers are actually smaller in the winter months. Let’s say to expect 200,000 this year. For comparison, the last year I can find numbers for, the year 2014, the number of live births in Italy was just over 500,000.

So the numbers coming in, almost all of them young men, are of the same order of magnitude as the number of new Italians being born.

Most of those July numbers came from Nigeria and Eritrea. Not many of them actually want to stay in Italy. They are aiming for the nations of northwest Europe, with their higher levels of prosperity and lusher welfare systems. That accords with the wishes of the Italians, who would prefer to just shunt them northwards.

Unfortunately the countries to the immediate north of Italy—Switzerland, France, and Austria—don’t want these invaders in their countries, even if they’re just passing through. Those countries have been fortifying their borders. So Italy is now experiencing what your plumber would call a nasty backup.

And here we see another “movement” advance:
This is a danger the Alt Right may face as well if it continues to grow in prominence. Already, we see attempts at co-option and a push to deny the role of race as central to the Alt Right.
I thought what is central to the Alt-Right was a combination of undercuts, Pepe the Frog, HBD race realism, “game,” and snarky juvenile comments? 

Clinton’s speech and commercial have all but coronated Jared Taylor, Peter Brimelow, etc. as the leaders of the New Right.

If we accept that, we’ve already lost before we’ve even begun. Can I choose my own leaders, please?  

In The News, 12/21/15

Insanity keeps on rolling along.

Two of the “movement’s” favorite countries, Germany and Austria, are behaving in a manner that we can term, to borrow a phrase from Bernie Levanters, “pathological.” Actually, it should be the opposite: those nations that take in refugees should be those facing sanctions and legal action. I also like the women-baby pictures used by the media to depict refugees and migrants, most of who are actually violent young men.

Building upon a post from yesterday, we observe Bernie’s “pathological” delusion continues.   Details about what Trump said about “cheering Muslims” are irrelevant to the main issue, shown by opinion polls, that a significant fraction of American Muslims support radical Islam. That’s a fact that off of Sanders’ Middle-Eastern flim-flam cannot change. Sanders can babble all he wants about economics; the emptiness of his analysis was exposed by yesterday’s post here.

Hillary the liar.  Is she “pathological” as well, Bernie Asiatic?  Interesting that the reality is that ISIS mentions airstrikes in their recruitment, yet the System continues to promote airstrikes despite that. The reason was also discussed in yesterdays post. The System is a ratchet that moves ONLY in an anti-White direction. Any major decision of the System can be predicted based upon whether it helps or harms Whites.  If it helps, it will be opposed.  It it harms, it be will promoted.  That’s it.

And here we see Ayn Rand fan Paul Ryan.  The support in the “movement” for racially destructive Jewess Rand could be baffling, but then I remember the stupidity of the “movement” – it’s infatuation with “libertarianism” and its obsession with particular racial phenotypes that the Jewess cleverly used to describe the sociopathic “heroes” of her stories, to make those “heroes” more appealing to the types of nitwits who believe that the poisonous memes of a Jewish hag have a deep positive meaning for “our cause.”

That’s why I reject a “big tent” (real) movement – one has to oppose evil and stupidity, not embrace it. I mean, the “movement’s” ultimate hero, Saint Adolf, also rejected the “big tent” and followed a rock hard ideology, supplanting and/or assimilating rivals. Interesting how the “movement” rejects that sound advice from their hero, but will accept ludicrous racial theories about “drooping Czech moustaches.”

HBDer Notices Another HBDer Attacking Trump

And the stupidity marches on.

Derbyshire, he of the East Asian wife, notices another HBDer and Euro-East Asian miscegenator (*), the “libertarian social scientist” Charles Murray, bashing obnoxious rightist buffoon Trump, he the darling of breathless HBD-oriented gamesters.

You can’t keep the players (no pun intended, PUA pansies) straight without a scorecard.

Such is the state of the “American HBD Right.”  Even the “movement” is not as pathetic as that.

*Suchart Dej-Udom and kids.

Predatory Capitalism Exploits White American Individualism

Manipulating middle class and working class White voters.

Individualism requires ethics and moral principles. Thus, it fails when invaded by ethnocentric tribalists. But it can also fail for other reasons – such as being exploited by fatcat capitalists and their rent-seeking behavior, to influence the political system to amass more wealth and power.

In America, a lot of the whole “individualism, libertarianism, small government” meme derives from the wealthy exploiting the natural tendencies of White Americans to favor such things, in order to establish big market capitalism, outsourcing, and mass migration. Chamber of Commerce cabals are “playing unfair” with individualism just as do, say, Jews. All this talk of “let’s make the country safe for the small businessman” really means “let’s make the country safe for the Koch brothers, let’s make the country safe for Gates and Zuckerberg, let’s ship the jobs to China and import Mexicans and Asians to do whatever jobs can’t be shipped out.”
When Democrats assert that the White middle class and working class vote against their own economic interests by supporting Republicans, they are right. But they betray their own racial interests even more by voting Democrat. 

Of Rights and Retards

Against retardation.

Retard number one:

You are laboring under the delusion that vaccinations, especially of babies and children, have no serious side-effects, and provide a true form of immunity. Have you ever looked into those who claim otherwise? I mean a serious, thorough look.

Yes, I have.  In contrast, have you, seriously and thoroughly, looked at the overwhelming evidence in support of the efficacy and safety of vaccination?  I doubt it.  Newsflash: doctors do not “make money” off of giving vaccinations. I myself have ZERO financial or other incentive. Vaccination (a White invention, albeit that’s irrelevant to this argument) are an amazing human accomplishment. Peoples of the past, desperate to avoid diseases killing their children, would have done virtually anything to have what some today blithely refuse.  Ironically, it is because of vaccination that these diseases have decreased in frequency so as to make people think vaccination is not necessary. And, no, it’s not from “improved hygiene and medical care.”  Our “hygiene and medical care” is as good now as it has ever been but, strangely enough, we are now having measles outbreaks decades after America was declared “measles free.”  Gee…maybe it has to do with the rise of the non-vaccinated, coupled with increased immigration and tourism. Shocking how our “hygiene” and “clean water” don’t compensate for falling vaccination rates.
It’s amazing how people attack vaccines, which are generally very safe and effective, while they happily swallow medications like Adderall or statins, that have frequent side-effects and are of questionable utility to the general population. I speculate that folks have an unconscious aversion to needles – the doctor is “raping” them with the needles, “forcing” things into them. If only the vaccines came in pill form!  Ironically enough, a true example of vaccine side effects (albeit more to others than the vaccine-taker) was with the oral live polio vaccine – the injections of killed polio are safer.  But…needles are scary!

I would “sleep with” an AIDS-“infected” man (provided he was handsome enough) with no “protection” to prove my point. I know I would not “get” AIDS.

Please do.  Really, I would encourage it.  In fact, if it were in my power, I would find many “handsome” AIDS-infected men to sleep with you, unprotected, on a daily basis. The more the better!  And since you obviously don’t believe HIV is in any way harmful (another conspiracy!), then, if and when (hopefully!) you are infected, you will of course eschew medication.  I would very much like to assist in arraigning this experiment.      

Although I wonder: would you disclose your HIV status to any subsequent non-infected “handsome” men who cross your bed?  Or would that violate your libertarian “right to privacy?”  After all, the men make their “free market choice.” Caveat emptor!      
By the way, I haven’t forgotten your previous assertion that you would refuse vaccine if bitten by a rabid animal. That’s another experiment I’d love to arrange (Stronza, meet Cujo!), but first it’s best for you to live some years with HIV and non-medicated.  We would certainly want your immune system to be properly prepared for the rabies virus.

Retard number two:
Your blithe ignorance regarding the dangers of vaccinations suggests that you have willfully swallowed the indoctrination force-fed us by the public schools, the federal government, the pharmaceutical industry (which controls the FDA), and the allopathic medical establishment (now essentially dominated by Jewish money).
Following science is “ignorance.”  Ignoring science in favor of tinfoil hat stupidity is clever. Of course, this is all a “Jewish money” conspiracy.  That’s right.  Right this moment, Moshe Finklestein is here with his briefcase stuffed with cash, giving me my payoff. Strange though that it never works in the other direction.  (Jewish) lawyers of course have no financial incentive to claim vaccine damage and sue, or incentive to clamor for overturning the injury caps set in place to protect vaccine manufacturers from the sort of frivolous lawsuits they were getting over the tetanus vaccine. As well, snake oil salesmen of “natural remedies” have no financial interests in the anti-vax campaign either. It’s just all those Jewish doctors! It’s a plot! A Doctors Plot! Stalin was right!
Statists of your ilk are why some of us might prefer a more libertarian White society which focuses government on the common defense, the administration of justice, and the impartial settling of disputes and in which we could take responsibility for our own choices and not have others’ bad choices forced upon us. This is after all how humans learn, grow, and evolve.
This absolute retard is so overcome with his/her/its hysteria, it didn’t even read what I wrote. What about the rights of others, you moron?  What about responsibility to society?  Don’t want to get vaccinated?  Fine. Live on an isolated commune with your fellow Typhoid Marys. Refuse to do so?  Infect someone?  If they live, you are jailed for assault and battery, perhaps attempted murder. They die?  You get the death penalty for homicide. Want to smoke?  Fine. I smell your smoke, you are jailed for assault and battery. That’s the responsibility for your choices. Your responsibility does not end with yourself. It includes the rights of others. Libertarians are solipsistic, navel-gazing, childish imbeciles, who think the entire world revolves around them and their “rights.”  Guess what?  Others have rights too. The right not to be exposed to your diseases, the right not to inhale your smoke, the right not to pay the social costs of your bad decisions. You are also a hypocrite. You don’t want government to tell you to be vaccinated, but you want the same government to administer “the impartial settling of disputes.”  In other words, if your unvaccinated kid kills my infant with their viruses, you want the government to protect you from my vengeance, and settle the dispute “impartially.”  Coward.  And the fact that you are benefiting from free-riding from the herd immunity of others means you’re a parasitic low-life. That’s why I despise libertarians of your ilk, you lousy bastard.

Enough already with these idiots. Libertarians are no better than feral ghetto Negroes: me, me, me, always rights, never responsibilities, with a sociopathic disregard for the concept that others have rights as well, and a childish disregard for the reality that sometimes rights clash, and society must adjudicate in favor of the interests of the majority.

And it says much about the “movement” – and why I want no part of it – that whenever these issues come up on forums, no one, not once, supports science and the science of vaccination, and no one confronts the libertarians and their navel-gazing conception of “rights.”

Rights, Responsibilities, and Gay Marriage

Comment left at Counter-Currents.

There have been cases where deaf parents have refused to have their deaf children get treatment to restore hearing in order to preserve “deaf culture.” Now, no where in my post did I talk about government coercion. To conflate my positions on these issues with child transgenderism (which I view as mutilation and abuse) is pathetic. However, I morally object to that choice.
My views on these issues are the same on smoking. Rights and responsibilities flow in both directions. if someone chooses to smoke, if they want the right to smoke, then they must be completely responsible for the health consequences and they must ensure that their smoke does not bother non-smokers. Amazingly enough, non-smokers have the same right not to choke on fumes walking down a sidewalk behind a smoker as does the smoker have the right to “enjoy the cigarette.”
Those who enjoy their hearing disability, and refuse treatment, then have the responsibility to navigate through life with ZERO accommodation from society. Those who are deaf through no fault of their own should of course have reasonable accommodation. If we value hearing as normal and deafness as abnormal, withholding treatment from a child is abuse. On the other hand, transgenderism is abnormal, supporting such for a child is also abuse.
Those who believe they have the right to refuse vaccinations also have the responsibility to live out the consequences of their choice. Why should society accommodate them? Fine, let’s not shoot them in a White ethnostate. Instead, they should be shunned and quarantined, and they can live out their lives in small villages, far from civilization. Society has no obligation to accommodate them, to treat their illness, or to risk infection to those who have legitimate reasons for not being vaccinated (age, immune deficiency) or for that minority vaccinated who did not develop immunity.
Libertarian types are funny people. Like Coloreds, they rant about “rights” but never about responsibilities. The same with gays and gay marriage. One thing not mentioned in my essay is the health issue. A major reason for the spread of HIV in America was the spectacularly promiscuous lifestyles of (at least male) homosexuals. After which, they demanded their rights that a large portion of American biomedical research be dedicated to that disease. You see, on their end, all the rights to do as they please, and the burden to deal with the consequences lies with society. Or, like Big Business and their immigration – internalize the benefits and externalize the costs.
Getting back to gays – are gays in gay marriage going to be monogamous? Sure, I know married heterosexuals fool around (I read rates in France are very high for adultery), but there is a big difference between an expectation of monogamy (heterosexual) and the expectation of “let’s have this big campy wedding and thumb our noses at society and then continue to sleep around as before” (homosexual). What homosexuals need to explain is why they NEED marriage, instead of a “civil union” that would provide the same legal benefits. It’s because they DEMAND validation. Just like Bruce Jenner and his very public masquerade as a woman – all the abnormals, the freaks, those who are different, DEMAND that society accommodate and celebrate them. It’s borne out of a bizarre combination of insecurity, arrogance, and resentment. It’s not enough that people do X,Y, Z. All the rest of us not only have to accept it, but celebrate it.

But if they have the right to X,Y,Z, others should have the right to shun X,Y,Z.