Category: Majority Rights

Sallis, Strom, and Racial Purity

Depends who writes it, I guess.

Remember this essay?  Remember the criticism the basic points received from the Nutzi peanut gallery?

Read this from Strom, emphasis added:

We have common ancestry with every living creature on this planet, if you go back far enough. So the old racialist idea of “purity” — meaning an unbroken, nearly identical lineage going “back to Adam” — was wrong from the start. Purity is the wrong word; those who used it were unaware of the ever-evolving nature of life. They were ignorant of evolution, which is a branching process; they didn’t know that all the races, varieties, subspecies, and species that ever lived are branches on one metaphorical tree — and that, going backwards in time, all the branches eventually converge into one at the root.

Question: Is the crazed mestizo “Chechar” going to accuse Strom of “sophistry?”  Does Strom – long associated with radical Nordicists like Pierce – have a “Medicist” agenda?  Or is he just talking hard science and plain common sense?

So: If Sallis writes it, then it’s bad.  If Strom writes it, it’s acceptable.  The exact same point, expressed by two different people, received in completely different ways.  Does that tell you anything?  

Then, this:

As the writer David Sims tells us, “Morally speaking, a flaw is anything that works contrary to survival. In any proper moral system, survival has the highest value. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value at all to extinct groups. Because only to something alive may anything else be good. If a moral system gives to anything but survival the highest place of value, sooner or later a conflict will arise between survival and whatever that other thing is.

Agreed, and that’s a point I was making long ago at Majority Rights, arguing against both the cognitive elitism of GNXP, and the aracial conservatism of John Ray.  We care about various ideas, in the last analysis, based upon how they affect us as people, as evolved organisms, and an idea does not benefit a group if that idea contributes to that group’s demise, or even if it doesn’t positively contribute to that group’s survival.

Regurgitating obviously wrong ideas about an absolute racial purity, which is easily discredited by the Left, does not serve the cause of survival.  A forward-looking emphasis on EGI and evolution (concepts that are not incompatible, by the way, regardless of “movement” lies that EGI favors “genetic stasis”) does enhance group survival – such arguments are proofed against an honest scientific critique.

Advertisements

Ted Sallis Interviews Mike Rienzi!

A Memorial Day special.

Millennials and Generation Zers like to pontificate about how very much superior they are to “Boomers” and to Generation Xers, and yet, in reality, the absolutely laughable cluelessness of these younger types is matched only by their overweening attitude of self-importance.

As an example of such cluelessness:

Cornelius • 6 hours ago
I am 25. Can we all just stop and think about how Thomas Jackson, the author of this article, has been writing for American Renaissance…for 20 YEARS. He has been writing articles like this since before AmRen went online. That is very cool. And let me just applaud Thomas Jackson for his persistent work for our people, for laying the groundwork for future generations of Europeans. Bravo!

Yes, indeed, that is “very cool.”  Just like the fine work of Trevor Lynch at Counter-Currents and The Unz Review. Jackson and Lynch are so impressive – so very, very cool – that I’m sure “Cornelius” would like both Thomas Jackson and Trevor Lynch to be interviewed on podcasts about their work and how they got involved with Amren and Counter-Currents, respectively. Bravo!  Hip Hip Hooray!

In like manner, I present here an online interview I conducted with Mike Rienzi of the late lamented Legion Europa site, and who used to write for Amren and TOQ as well.

Sallis: Welcome Mr. Rienzi.  I just want to say how honored I am to be interviewing you; you are a giant among activists, a veritable genius!

Rienzi: I wish I could say the same about you, Ted, but you’re just crazy and bitter, a low information moralizer if I ever saw one.  And are you even White?

Sallis:  Off-White, then.  More of a Beige, I suppose. Now, sir, let’s discuss the failure of Legion Europa.

Rienzi: What is there to discuss? You just can’t compete with affirmative action.  Is there any difference with EGI Notes?

Sallis: It is all one.

Rienzi: Thus and so.

Sallis: And I know that you were interviewed by Robert Griffin for One Sheaf One Vine.  I must say, sir, that your experiences were remarkably similar to mine.

Rienzi: We have much in common, no doubt.

Sallis:  Didn’t you once meet William Pierce, just like I did?

Rienzi:  Yes, indeed, I did meet Pierce.  In fact, I met you there as well.  We met with Pierce together, don’t you remember?

Sallis: Yes, quite right.  You are correct. I think we both made a mighty fine impression on Pierce, although possibly he thought that both of us were full-blooded Negroes, Nigerians straight off the plane.

Rienzi: Is that why he offered both of us bananas to eat?

Sallis: And then Hadley grabbed one and ran off with it.  I didn’t know cats ate bananas.

Rienzi: We are getting off topic here.

Sallis: Well, I guess that means we are at the end of our interview. Perhaps we can follow up in a podcast?

Rienzi: Yes, but only as long as you invite JW Holliday who used to write for Majority Rights.

Sallis: I’ll get right on it. He may be a bit hard to find though.  I’ll ask “Cornelius” for some advice on that.

Ethnocentrism, Chinese Nationalist Maiden, Sex Strike

In der news.

Read this.

Prof. Dutton tries to explain the relatively low ethnocentrism of whites. One theory is that we have an evolutionary strategy based on producing geniuses. Exceptional people make breakthroughs that advance the interests of the group, but the type of environment that produces and supports such people is one of low conformity. This would decrease ethnocentrism. 

As he does in his earlier book, At Our Wits’ End, Prof. Dutton also argues that social changes connected with the Industrial Revolution have meant far less natural selection in industrialized populations since then. For most of history, children with maladaptive traits usually died, but now they often survive. This means harmful mutations stay in the gene pool. 

Prof. Dutton argues that ethnocentrism benefits groups in the struggle for survival, so natural selection has generally promoted it, whereas maladaptive attitudes such as very low ethnocentrism are the product of mutations. Mental and physical abnormalities due to genetic mutations are often found together, so that as the population is increasingly burdened with mutations affecting physical health, it may also be afflicted with reduced ethnocentrism, which reduces a population’s chances for long-term survival.

Is there an inverse relationship between degrees of ethnocentrism and the levels of such deleterious mutations?  This could be assayed. I avoid making comments about intra-European possibilities here, but the failures of Der Movement’s affirmative action “leadership” raises possibilities.

By the way, will Amren review Dutton’s book on Rushton?  Inquiring minds want to know.

Me so horny, me ruv you rong rong time:

Chinese Nationalist Maiden • 20 hours ago

I have witnessed for a long time that Whites are less ethnocentric than other races…

Is that why Whites let the likes of you live in their nations and infest their “pro-White” websites?

…and that is why I consistently try to increase White ethnocentrism.

By living in their nations.

I am not scared of White ethnocentrism. 

Really?  Even when your yellow rear end is kicked back to Hepatitis Land?

I agree with Kevin Macdonald’s view that Whites are unusually altruistic, which explains their weirdly low ethnocentrism. 

Exemplified by your presence at Amren.

However, I really hope Whites wake up soon because it is not good for the future of humanity if this planet becomes flooded with low-IQ peoples as low-fertility, high-IQ races, namely Whites and East Asians, decline. 

IQ, IQ, Asians have high, high IQ!  Asians are really declining, eh?  There are hundreds of millions more Chinese alone (a single Asian ethnic group) than there are all Whites combined, worldwide. Asians are in such “decline” that their excess population floods into White nations.

Currently, the East Asian demographic decline is inevitable due to low fertility. 

And if China loses half-a-billion people they’ll be down to where the entire White race is right now.

Together with Whites, we will be a dwindling minority in centuries to come…

Lie.

…and therefore we need a strategy for high-IQ peoples.

Whites enslaved to Asian interests.

However, idiots like Xi Jinping make sound racial thinking nigh to impossible in China…

Which is why the Chinese are fiercely nationalistic and are practicing eugenics.

…whilst the West is not being helped either by the liberals and (((rulers))) who wish for White genocide.

If the subtle sexual bait is not enough, there’s a (((little pretense))) of anti-Jewishness to whet Nutzi appetites.  Just like that Japatrix from Majority Rights.  It’s as if they are reading off the same script…which is probably the case.

Retarded wopess just confirmed to the world that all women are basically whores who use sex to control men.

MGTOW, my friends, MGTOW.

Those deceptive yeastbuckets.

More MGTOW.

Swallow Your Blackpill, 1/23/19

Let’s consider reality.

Watch this.

I haven’t said anything so far about the Covington Catholic School incident, but let me say this. This incident, coming so soon after the James Watson and Steve King fiascos, demonstrate very clearly that Whites are a pathetic, powerless, subaltern caste who are hated and despised by the entire System, and who have defenders, no supporters, no leaders.  Decade after decade the “movement” has preened and pontificated, churned through millions of dollars and through the lives of its supporters, and more recently championed the Presidency of a vulgar fraud (When is that Covington invite to the White House coming Donny?  Will you invite some of your Antifa friends there as well, to punch these innocent children?  Maybe little Jeff would like to do it?). The end result: Whites are more of a disenfranchised, humiliated, oppressed population now than ever before.  And the outrageously incompetent leaders have the nerve – shall we say the chutzpah – to debate among themselves “when our victory will be achieved.”  Are they really that delusional, or are they merely protecting their reputations and their cash flows?

And why don’t the Covington boys get a nice lawyer and sue all those celebrities openly calling for attacks on children, and sue Twitter for allowing it (and for maintaining all those “blue check marks”), while others are deplatformed simply for expressing legitimate political opinions?

Aren’t there any lawyers willing to take the case?  Or is that – the lack thereof – another indication of the “untouchable” status of Whites in American today? 

Hey, Greg, here’s some female “agency” for you.

And some more.

Daniels is the archetypal J Richards poster girl – blonde, man-jawed, big-boned, and floppy-breasted.  And of course, if you disagreed with Richards’ standards of female beauty, then you were “insane.”  That was during the rapid decline phase of Majority Rights, a phase that Counter-Currents is currently enjoying.

In any case, to me, Daniels has all the sex appeal of warmed-over roadkill, but Trump apparently was favorably impressed at one point in time.  There’s no accounting for taste, I suppose.

I was annoyed recently reading about crazed feminists accusing Gene Wolfe (of all people!) of being a “misogynist” who is “insensitive” to yeastbucket feelings because his female characters are “not well formed” and some of his male characters (Severian I suppose) sometimes treat milady with less than beta obsequious behavior.  This is the same Gene Wolfe who was devoted to his wife and who converted to Catholicism – becoming a devout practitioner of that religion – for his wife’s sake.  That’s the same Gene Wolfe whose books are actually full of interesting female characters.  But you can’t please SJW scum.  I also remember some retards accusing Wolfe of “anti-Asian racism” because they stupidly thought that the robot-like “Ascians” were “Asians,” while they clearly are the population of a far-future America. In The Book of the New Sun, the “Xanthic lands” are where Asia is or was – The Commonwealth is in South America; Ascia is in North America.  But I assume the SJWs would find the word “Xanthic” offensive as well.  After all, we can call Europeans “White” but we cannot call East Asians “Yellow.”

Talking about Wolfe always reminds me of my other favorite sci-fi writer, Jack Vance, whose healthy attitudes towards milady were described here, and also described here.

In addition, a young and attractive woman in Cugel’s Saga is described thus:

…gifted with a buxom chest and robust little haunches while still retaining a slender and flexible waist…

Cugel is “worse” than his literary “descendant” Severian in how he treats milady.  Although sometimes Cugel is insulted, tricked, and mistreated by cunning females, he also often gets back at them very well, including incidents of forced sex, which in The Eyes of the Overworld is given the euphemism “couching.”

I am of course not in any way condoning or supporting the behavior so depicted – of course the attitude of men toward women must be that of beta orbiter groveling, lickspittle admiration, and the idea that every slutty landwhale reeking of festering yeast is a potential Joan of Arc leading us to deliverance.  But, still, Vance is amusing, no?

And in contrast to “The Ring” and other Tolkien crap, Vance presents to us the “Pectoral Sky-break Spatterlight” that I definitely greatly prefer.  The former is a Type I literary artifact; the latter, Type II.

One less for Derbyshire.

Saturday Movement Roundup

A wide variety of nonsense.  In all cases, emphasis added.

From Majority Rights:

Then again, where Cochran suggests that Jewry should take over Italy (because it is “easy to do” based on their record in WWII) instead of being Zionists, and inhabiting that barren and unappealing land in the Middle East, I need to muster the largest NO THANKS! that I can to that suggestion.

You know, I often make sarcastic comments about HBDers, such as that they would like to replace the hated Afrowops with Jews and Chinamen.  Apparently, Sallis is prescient even with sarcasm, since the HBDers actually prescribe such a course of action.

Once again: HBD is a purely political movement dedicated to advancing the interests of Jews and Asians.  And, yes, there will also be “Aryan” traitors willing to take Unzian thirty pieces of shekels to promote the HBD creed.  We also observe another attribute of HBDism: the animus toward so-called “White ethnics.”  

I suppose the HBD dream world can be described thus: Jewish and Asian overlords, subaltern Nordic serfs (the women being used as sex slaves for Jews and Asians), with the swarthoids and hunkies of Europe eliminated.

Yellow Fever makes you stupid.  Either Sallis is on a roll, predicting reality, or reality is on a roll, actualizing Sallisian memes.  You choose.

Amren comment:

Crazycat • 2 hours ago
Chinese supposedly have some of the highest I.Q.’s on the earth, but somehow they still need to steal white technology. Fascinating……

More Durocher.

Two things. First, lest we forget, the great and good Andrew Hamilton was hostile to Shakespeare because too many of his plays took place in swarthoid areas.  I kid you not.

Second:

For most of us however, the answer is simple: find a young woman of beauty and good character, beget and educate fine children, that you and your nation live on in them!

I assume Durocher has taken his own advice here?  

Lothrop born again:

Lothrop Stoddard
‏@StoddardLothrop
 13h13 hours ago
More
Sarah Jeong is a good argument against legal, skilled hi-IQ immigration from Asia.  Immigrants may come here just to work and be productive, but their kids get into the hate-whitey university system and end up indulging their little resentments and insecurities as race warfare.

No, no, a thousand times no!  What will the Silkers say?  Isn’t she a potential border guard of the west?

Who’s an alpha male?

irina
It’s fascinating to see this from a male perspective. As a woman who sees the difference immediatly between an alpha and a beta, I have a slightly different explanation.
When I’m with my friends, and we are introduced to a new male, we all individually assess his status. Because we have varied tastes and interests, it is very rare that one man manages to blow all of us away. We are all varied in attractiveness, intellect, cultural background, and income. The alphiest alpha is the guy who can meet and exceed all of our expectations.
Obviously, there have been very few men who have done thsi [sic], but here are several examples:
1) Mr. L: Mr. L is 6’4, very broad, athletic, and rugged looking. He had managed to hook up with at least 4 girls in my immediate circle of friends. Because he had such a great character, none of us had any hard feelings about him not wanting to actually date any of us. We just accepted it, because he was good looking and nice. Mr. L has a very large penis, though I do not know from experience. Mr. L is decently intelligent, and is so confident and kindhearted that even my most intellectually-inclined friends did not mind. Sophomore year of college he fell in love with one of my (very beautiful, kind, and intelligent) good friends, and they have recently gotten married. Overall his alphaness is a sum of the following: natural confidence (not cockiness), him clearly being the most dominant man in the room, good looks, large size, great personality, no hang ups about ever being a beta because he was never one, and amazing heart.
2) Mr. M: Mr. M is also tall, quite handsome in a pretty boy way, and also very kind. He has been my ex boyfriend’s best friend since high school. One night three of my girl friend’s met him at bar, and individually decided that he was above and beyond the alphiest of the guys they’d seen all night. He engages you in a conversation, he pays attention to your every word, and he took great care to make sure we all got home safe. He is a natural- he does not do anything just to get girls, because the girls flock to him regardless of what he does. Again, his alphaness can be summed up: good looks, height, attention to detail, the fact that he is a very good friend, and amazing heart.
3) Mr. D: I have known Mr. D since I was like 15 because he took violin lessons with my little sister. He is tall, dark, and handsome. His parents make him work for his tuition, violin lessons, dorm, etc. Because he wanted to fit in with American boys, he adopted the typical cool/macho attitude of fratty mcdouches. A lot of women find this attitude quite sexy, I do not. However, once a girl sits down and talk to him and discovers how humble and hard-working he is, she is bound to fall for him. His girlfriends are always 9s and 10s. Alphaness: looks, confidence, humility, and an amazing heart. Again, I give him an A- in alpha for the cockiness, but that’s just a personal pet peeve.
Notice what both of these guys have in common- they are kind men, because they never have to act like jerks to get women. I have many other examples if you want me to share, but I think you get the point: most women can totally smell if your confidence is substantial or if it’s a front. To be the alphiest alpha, it has to be genuine and have had to have been that way for his whole life. I’m sure the converted betas do quite well, but not as well.

Now, consider:

Notice what both of these guys have in common…

Yes, all tall and “rugged looking” or “quite handsome” or “handsome.”  Contra Roissy’s (self-interested?) mantra that male looks are not very important for alphaness, if you ignore the odd outliers and look at general trends, then alphas will be one or more of the following: (1) tall and good-looking, (2) rich and/or a celebrity, (3) someone who picks up SMV points for racial reasons – e.g., White females swooning over Negro half-apes, or boy-bodied Asiatrices swooning over White nerd Bill Gates look-a-likes (minus his wealth).

I also “notice” that this yeastbucket used the word “both” to describe three examples.  Well, women are not good at math, as we know.

…they are kind men…

Sure they are.  Particularly:

…he adopted the typical cool/macho attitude of fratty mcdouches…

followed by:

…they never have to act like jerks to get women.

Women are absolutely clueless.  They have less self-awareness than your typical bacterium.

Jew Gottfried – who rejects White nationalism (surprise!) – defends the ineptness of the Alt Right.

No one could have done better, you see.  Note very carefully how this works.  First, Der Movement’s strict ethnic affirmative action policy ensures that only Spencers, Johnsons, Taylors, et al. are “leadership.”  Then, after making sure that others are absolutely prevented from trying out their own ideas, then say “no one could have done any better.”  Imagine an affirmative action slot for a job position.  The only people interviewed are, say, Negroes, and a Negro is hired.  The Negro typically screws up.  Then some HuWhite commentator tells us that “no one else could have done any better.”  Perhaps.  But we would never know unless they were given the opportunity, would we?

Silk Road News: They Even Steal and Copy Rice

Steal, Copy, Steal, Copy, Copy, Steal, Copy, Steal.

Read here, emphasis added:

A scientist from China has been sentenced to 10 years in prison in the United States for stealing seeds of genetically modified American rice, the Department of Justice announced Wednesday. 

The Chinese scientist, Weiqiang Zhang, 51, was a legal permanent resident living in Manhattan, Kansas. He was working as a rice breeder at Ventria Bioscience, a biopharmaceutical company that creates genetically modified rice. He stole hundreds of rice seeds from the company that had cost millions of dollars and taken years of research to develop, according to the Justice Department. He kept the seeds in his home.

Then in 2013, United States Customs and Border Protection agents found the seeds in luggage belonging to researchers who visited Zhang from China. They were on their way back to China with the seeds.

In February, he was convicted of three counts: Conspiring to steal trade secrets, conspiring to transport stolen property across states lines and transporting stolen property between states. 

“Weiqiang Zhang betrayed his employer by unlawfully providing its proprietary rice seeds to representatives of a Chinese crop institute,” Acting Assistant Attorney General John Cronan said in a statement. “Today’s sentence demonstrates the significant consequences awaiting those who would steal trade secrets from American companies.”

Hey, what’s the problem? Just a little exchange of ideas along the Silk Road, right? In return, we can get all those Chinese girls with guns guarding the borders of the West, to the squealing masochistic delight of White omega males. It’s a win-win! And, I’m sure all the Alt Wrong self-declared “yellow supremacists” have no problem with the Holy Orientals helping themselves to our trade secrets and inventions, although perhaps they can explain why those big-brained, high-high-high-IQ Orientals are unable to actually invent, discover, or create anything of value on their own.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on!

SLC News, 3/30/18

Yet more stupidity, lies, and cowardice.

Quota Queen Alert!

Hmmm…who was it who predicted the downfall of the Alt Right – that the Alt Right fever would eventually burn itself out?

“Movement” failure can be chalked up to three inter-related reasons:

1. A defective ideology; the same old tired fossilized memes, sweaty racial fantasies, obsessive ethnic fetishism, rigid dogma, all with a healthy helping of solipsism, self-delusion, and pseudoscience.

2. A failed leadership.  Affirmative action leads to incompetence, and this holds true not only for “women and minorities” in the broader society, but also for “cuck naggers” in Der Movement.

3. A significant fraction, possibly a majority, of rank-and-file activists are Type I Nutzi defectives.

So, the defective ideology justifies the affirmative action policy and attracts the Nutzis. The failed leaders grasp onto the ideology that props up their own “leadership,” while the Nutzis support and enable the tragicomic failures of their leaders.

Neither the leaders nor the followers will condemn themselves and break the cycle, and they certainly will not denounce the ideology that forms the center of (what passes for) their identity.

A New Movement needs to arise to displace the crumbling ruin of the Old.  Do I believe that will happen?  No, but I will continue being a “voice in the wilderness” and hold out hope.

Roissy endorses this comment:

One thing that beta male white knight faggots don’t want to hear about is the obsession that bitches have with wanting to fuck mass murderers. […]
If you want to live in some fantasy dreamworld where “they’re not all like that” then go ahead, but if you don’t accept the truth you’re just going to go through your entire life getting fucked over by these skanks.
Conversely, if you look at them as what they are – stupid, wild animals – they you might have a chance to make a relationship with one work. Just always remember that as a boyfriend/husband you are basically a zookeeper, trying to keep control over a twisted amoral beast.

I endorse the comment as well, the description is 100% correct.  It goes off the rails with its subsequent prescription: we need “game” you see, which is, in essence, pure pussy pedestalization; men need to modulate their every word and action, down to the most minute detail, to appeal to these “twisted amoral beasts.”

How about this: NO.

Sir MGTOW vs. the Yeastbuckets!

Yeah, and there’s no god either, but Frannie boy won’t tell you that.

The Sallistrian religious paradox: The higher one goes up the religious hierarchy the less likely one is to actually believe in god or all the other religious nonsense.

Some old hag fumbling with her rosaries in church believes unconditionally, a priest has his doubts, a bishop understands the value of religion for social control, and the college of cardinals, and the pope derived from then, knows full well the truth and its ideological utility.

Surprise, surprise.  “America’s Senator” fails again.

Hey Jeff, just do what you do best: stand around helplessly, looking like a Howdy Doody doll without the ventriloquist.

I don’t think so, Donnie.

Dem Russkis are already ahead of us and pulling away fast.  Hint: having a nuclear deterrent that dates from the 1960s and 70s, with some sprinkling from the 80s, is not going to scare Russia or China.  Another hint: the constant US trend to downscale its nuclear bomb arsenal in both numbers and yield per weapon is not going to scare anyone either.  I realize, Donnie, that your Presidency, nay your entire existence, is all about empty blustering, but the hard men of Russia and China are not going to be deterred by your windbag exhortations.  No, only true force will do the job, and true force includes missiles than are not older than the fathers of the men whose fingers are on the button, and true force includes nuclear bombs than actually have yields greater than the early atom bombs of the late 40s.

Chinese Nationalist Whore writes:

As a Chinese, I come from a highly collectivistic society and I find it deeply naïve to think that Jews as a group will not have a major advantage over individuals who do not network in the same ethnocentric way.

Yes, indeed, and one good reason (besides of course their alien genotypes and phenotypes) Chinese should not be allowed into Western nations and should not be allowed on Western blogs.

As a kind Japanese writer named Riki Rei at Counter Currents points out, the Chinese elite is in bed with the Jewish elite.

Of course, the MR Silkers who say that any criticism of China is due to the critic being “a Jew or someone who sucks Jewish cock” (their words, not mine, in case you the reader are offended by the vulgarity).

Of course the Chinese are “in bed” with the Jews – the problem is that the Silkers want the Chinese to be in bed with them, literally, preferably all those Chinese girls with guns who are going to the “border guards of the West.”  Among White manlets, Silk Road White nationalism is nothing more or less than masochistic yellow fever fetishism.