Category: man on white horse syndrome

Trump, Bannon, Der Movement, and Ted Sallis

Right again…and again…and again…

Long time readers of this blog know that I have been critical of Trump for a long time, labeling him during the campaign as a vulgar and ignorant buffoon, a beta race cuck, a fraud, and a person who very clearly showed signs that he really want to be President. This post from October 2016 sums it up (emphasis added):

But, no, just like Der Movement that adores him, Trump is an incompetent affirmative action case, with no restraint or long-term strategic thinking. Some leftist criticisms of Trump are correct: he is intellectually and temperamentally unfit to be President.  But, Clinton is far more unfit, and, anyway, I’m not going to vote for Trump because I think he would be a good President.  I support Trump solely to send a message, solely to unleash the dogs of chaos, solely to throw a monkey wrench into the creaking machinery of the multicultural consensus. What we need more of: misery, despair, hatred, anger, distrust, racial and cultural balkanization; these are all things growing as a result of Fat Don’s unapologetic politically incorrect civic nationalism coupled to SJW hysteria and Colored entitlement.  
Let’s be honest though: Trump the man is a disaster, easily the worst general campaign candidate in my lifetime.  I’ve never seen such a combination of joyful ignorance, in-your-face laziness, unpreparedness, delusion, inability to learn from mistakes, the hysterical lack of restraint one would expect from one of Trump’s Negro friends (or even worse: a swarthoid Afrowop) – what is this Trump?  He’s a goddamn embarrassment.
And if the Trump lovers think I am being too harsh on their hero, consider the following. When Trump eschewed doing a mock debate, we were assured that he was being adequately prepped by his advisers while riding the campaign plane, advisers who were imploring Trump not to let himself be baited and side-tracked by Clinton.  And look what happened. What an idiot.
I do wonder what those psychologists told Clinton on how to handle Trump. Maybe something like this: “This guy Trump deep down really does not want to be President, he doesn’t want the responsibility, and he doesn’t want to give up his lifestyle.  He went into it for his ego, because he was angry at Obama.  But he is inwardly rebelling against becoming President, which is why he is constantly sabotaging himself.  All you need to do is set him up to self-destruct and he’ll inevitably detonate in an explosion of unrestrained tweets.”
Despite all of this, Trump can still win: after all, Clinton is also a historically terrible candidate and there’s lots of anger out there in White America.  But, let’s “keep it real” – anyone who says that Trump is “the last chance of White America” is more of an idiot than is Trump himself.

Note that I was correct about the chaos that Trump would bring.  Just look at 2017.

Der Movement’s take on Trump was quite different.  To the quota queens, Trump was “the last chance for White America,” an alpha male hero, The God Emperor, an American Caesar and we are fearful he may actually stabilize the corrupt System since he’ll be so good, someone who will enact real pro-White demographic change, a master of 4-D chess, having Sessions as Attorney General alone is worth Trump’s victory (that before Trump started feuding with Sessions and the Trump fanboys suddenly decided Sessions was a “boomer cuck”), Bannon will really get things moving for us (before Bannon was fired and the Trump-Bannon feud heated up, solidifying the power of the Jarvanka Jewish Globalist faction in the Trump administration), In Trump We Trust…well, you get the picture.

Recently, there have been some interesting revelations, based on a new book, which has led to the anti-Bannonism of Trump [Note: Bannon is an idiot himself for making the comments he did.  Notice how the Left never acts like these juvenile, retarded “rightists”].

Based on my reading of Trump, I believe that most of the “revelations” that follows are true.  Let’s look at these and compare them to the views of Trump of Sallis vs. Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Read this.

“I’ve known Steve Bannon a long time. If I thought he was a racist or alt-right or any of the things, the terms we could use, I wouldn’t even think about hiring him,” Trump told reporters who questioned Bannon’s white nationalist following on November 26, 2016.

Gee, so much for the Alt Right having great influence in The God Emperor Administration.

In February, Bannon was dubbed “The Great Manipulator” and the “second most powerful man in the world” on the cover of Time magazine. Later that month, a campaign titled “postcards to President Bannon” was initiated, joking that the Breitbart native was the real head of state.
Two months later, Bannon was removed from the National Security Council.
“I am my own strategist,” Trump told the New York Post in April. He then told the Wall Street Journal that Bannon was just “a guy who works for me.”

Hey, I thought Bannon in power was a crowning achievement for the Trump Presidency.

After the white supremacist protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August, Trump defended Bannon by saying: “I like Mr. Bannon. He is a friend of mine … He is a good man. He is not a racist. I can tell you that. He is a good person ... We’ll see what happens with Mr. Bannon.”

Note to Alt Right: According to Trump, being a “racist” and being a “good person” are completely incompatible, completely orthogonal.  Cuckadoodledoo!  All Hail the God Emperor!  Hail Kek!  Pepe!  Pepe!

Also read this.

According to Wolff, Trump didn’t want to become president. The ultimate goal of his bid for the White House was to become a “martyr” to Hillary Clinton and to become “the most famous man in the world.”
For those involved in his campaign, the goal was to lose by as small a margin as possible and then, after November, parlay their raised national profiles into bigger and better opportunities.
“His daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared would be international celebrities,” Wolff wrote. “Steve Bannon would become the de facto head of the Tea Party movement. Kellyanne Conway would be a cable news star. Melania Trump, who had been assured by her husband that he wouldn’t become president, could return to inconspicuously lunching. Losing would work out for everybody. Losing was winning.”

Gee, that sounds familiar.  It’s almost as it some Far Right blogger actually suggested back in October 2016 that Trump really didn’t want to actually be elected President.  

With no desire to win the White House, Trump had little plan for how to proceed with his post-election transition. Ailes, a longtime friend and confidante, recommended former House Speaker John Boehner to serve as his chief of staff. To which Trump replied: “Who’s that?”

Ignorant as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

According to Wolff, even Trump’s daughter has mocked his hair privately to friends and associates:
“She often described the mechanics behind it to friends: an absolutely clean pate — a contained island after scalp-reduction ­surgery — surrounded by a furry circle of hair around the sides and front, from which all ends are drawn up to meet in the center and then swept back and secured by a stiffening spray. The color, she would point out to comical effect, was from a product called Just for Men — the longer it was left on, the darker it got. Impatience resulted in Trump’s orange-blond hair color.”

Buffoon as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

And read this as well.

11. As a candidate, Trump had no interest in learning about the Constitution, which he knew very little about. “I got as far as the Fourth Amendment, before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head,” said Sam Nunberg, a former adviser to the Trump campaign.

Ignorant as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

16. Trump never reads. “He didn’t process information in any conventional sense. He didn’t read. He didn’t really even skim. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semiliterate,” the book says. 

Ignorant as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.

17. Trump would mention getting in bed with other women. “Trump liked to say that one of the things that made life worth living was getting your friends’ wives into bed,” the book claims.

Vulgar as in Vulgar Ignorant Buffoon.  I’m sure the Gamester-Roissy crowd thinks that this behavior is wonderfully “alpha” – to me, to the extent this is true, it shows that Trump is a moral turd, a despicable human being.

19. The president’s lifestyle followed many unusual routines. “If he was not having his 6:30 dinner with Steve Bannon, then, more to his liking, he was in bed by that time with a cheeseburger, watching his three screens and making phone calls,” the book says.

No comment.

Some may think that the well-balanced (not crazy and bitter) Ted is insufferable, but when you are right, you are right, and pointing out the track record of this blog vs. Der Movement is perfectly defensible when making points about the latter’s incompetence and undeserved support.

Meanwhile, all you “movement” rank-and-file continue to support all the “leaders” who are wrong time and again, idiots who once again fell for the “man on white horse syndrome.”  What we have in Der Movement is a form of reverse natural selection” you guys support the failed, the botched, the incompetent, while spurning those who have the good sense to understand things before they are obvious to the unwashed masses.

Advertisements

Der Stupidity, 12/9/17

More “movement” antics.

Richard Spencer (laughably) asserts that an obvious non-White mongrel like Markle can “pass for White or Italian” (those two categories being, obviously, separate and distinct).  The resident wop on the podcast, along with Spencer, ended up making a joke out of it all (one could almost hear Beavis and Butthead sniggering in the background), and the podcast went on, the small faux paus of ethnic fetishism gently skipped over with a chuckle, akin to adults smiling when a toddler innocently passes gas in public.

Very well, everyone is entitled to their opinions on racial phenotypes, just as they are entitled to the glasses or corrective eye surgery that they so sorely require.  The irony though is that while these fellows decry that the “conversation moves in only one direction” – focusing on the hypocrisy between royal mores of the 1930s compared to today – they themselves exhibit the same tendencies to follow rigid trains of thought. How about moving the conversation about racial phenotypes in other directions?  If accusations of “ethnic fetishism” are thought to be unfair, then when are we going to hear Der Movement discuss how David Bromstad looks more Asian than Yukio Mishima, or how Bjork can pass as a Japanese Geisha?  Blasphemy!  Blasphemy!  Time to vandalize the Bromstad Wikipedia page with new lies about a “Chinese mother,” no doubt.

Critiquing Der Movement once again, I note the absence so far (apart from this blog) of commentary about Donald “Saturated Fats” Trump, the vacuum cleaner scarfing up piles of junk food like any typical obese American land whale, and his slavishly pro-Jewish Jerusalem ploy.  America First?  Laughable.  But all the “movement” heroes no doubt don’t want to dwell too much on this, as it would focus unwanted attention on their unrequited Trump lovefest, and their incurable “man on white horse syndrome.”  

Rotten Orange News: The Yahweh Emperor

Hey, Trump fanboys….

…good thing he at least got something done in his Presidency, right?

Isn’t it great that Trump is expending his political capital to please Jews who didn’t vote for him, rather than fulfilling his campaign promises to the White Americans who did vote for him?  And we got tax breaks for wealthy Bush-Clinton supporters as well!  It just gets better and better!

What a neg!  Against his own followers, unfortunately.  As usual.

That sound you hear is Roissy, weeping softly, huddled in a corner, blowing his nose into a crumpled MAGA hat.

What the point of all the anti-Trump posts at this blog (besides the fact that the contents reflect current events of interest to Whites)?  By rubbing Der Movement’s face in their humiliation of Trump’s constant cuckiness, one can hope that the “man on white horse syndrome” will be cured.  Doubtful, though.

In Der News, 12/5/17

And the degeneration goes on.

Also see this. Remember when Rand Paul was thought to succeed Daddy Ron as the latest “movement man on white horse?”

Just remember who is in charge of law enforcement on the Federal level now – The God Emperor and America’s Senator.  Isn’t it interesting how anti-White law enforcement at the local level is increasing with impunity?

We know the answer to this, don’t we?

Trump is too busy doing other things.

…a typical dinner order for Trump consisted of “two Big Macs, two Fillet-O-Fish, and a chocolate malted” shake. Keep in mind the daily recommended calories for a sedentary, 71-year-old man like Trump is around 2,000 calories. Trump’s dinner alone comes out to a minimum of 2,672 calories, and that’s only if he orders a small shake…

…Staffers reportedly stocked Trump’s plane with lots of Oreo packages, because he “would not eat from a previously opened package.” The same doesn’t seem to be true for his other favorite treats: Vienna Fingers, potato chips (most likely his beloved Lay’s) and pretzels. Lewandowski and Bossie also describe Trump’s fondness for Kentucky Fried Chicken, pizza (which he typically eats with a knife and fork) and Diet Coke ― a soda he once tweeted he’d “never seen a thin person” drink.

Is that relevant to White racial interests?  Yes.  An obese buffoon who eats like a pig and has no self-discipline about his own diet is unlikely to be the “man on white horse” that is “the last chance for White America” and the “Caesar who is going to help us demographically.”  

Between Trump sitting around stuffing his fat face, and Sessions standing around looking like a befuddled Howdy Doody dummy doll, there’s not much hope of anything significant getting done, law enforcement wise.

The Nazi Next Time, II

Further analysis.

Let’s take another look at my The Nazi Next Time essay from 2015.  How does all of that look now from the perspective of Trump’s election and all the events from the year (and more) since that election?

Before we look back at the main points of that “Nazi” essay, let us consider that now, approximately two years later, certain elements of the System Left are beginning to reach similar conclusions.  Read this Frank Rich piece.

However common the ground of Democrats and Trumpists when it comes to economic populism, they will still be separated by the Trumpists’ adamant nativism, nationalism, and racism. The liberal elites who continue to argue that Democrats can win by meeting Trump voters halfway don’t seem to realize that those intransigent voters have long been hardwired to despise them.

The pot calling the kettle black?  Who despises who?  It was the Democratic Party’s abandonment of the White working class, in favor of Colored Identity Politics, which set the stage for right-wing populism to begin with.  Working class and middle class White Americans rightly perceive that the Democrats despise them, so why not return the favor?

Looking to the future in his 60 Minutes White House exit interview, Bannon said, “The only question before us” is whether it “is going to be a left-wing populism or a right-wing populism.” And that is the question, he added, “that will be answered in 2020.” Give the devil his due: He does have the question right. But there is every reason to fear that our unending civil war will not be resolved by any election anytime soon in the destabilized America that Trump will leave behind.

But the long-term threat is bigger than the potential arrival in the Capitol of radicals like Moore or the conspiracy theorist Kelli Ward, a possible inheritor of Flake’s Arizona seat. By illuminating a pathway to power that no one had thought possible, and demolishing the civic guardrails that we assumed protected us from autocrats, Trump has paved the way for far slicker opportunists to gain access to the national stage. Imagine a presidential candidate with Trump’s views and ambitions who does not arrive with Trump’s personal baggage, his undisciplined penchant for self-incrimination, and his unsurpassed vulgarity. 

Yes, I can imagine it: that’s why I wrote the “Nazi” essay; the vision was clear in my mind…and still is.

Finer-tooled instruments — smarter and shrewder demagogues than the movement’s current titular head — may already be suiting up in the wings.

Oh, we can only hope.  I do believe eventually, we’ll see that.

In any case: Sallis was prescient once again.

Now, back to the 2015 Sallis piece.

The hysterical angst of the Republican Establishment concerning the rise of Trump is glorious to observe.  Of course, the interesting thing is their complete lack of self-awareness, their lack of understanding that they themselves are responsible for the predicament they find themselves in.

I was I believe too kind to the GOP then.  Or, perhaps, I realize now that the Republicans don’t care about winning; they only care about being part of the System’s anti-White agenda.  Trumpism in the 2016 election gave the GOP sweeping victories at every level, leaving the Democratic Party in complete disarray.  2016 was a stunning confirmation that right-wing populism is the path for continued Republican electoral dominance even in the face of the changing demographics that the GOP itself has been complicit in promoting.  Trumpism can build a solid White voting bloc, with strengths among demographics (working class Whites, White ethnics) who were part of the Reagan coalition, but who have been straying from the GOP after decades of Neocon-corporate-cuckservatism, as exemplified by the Bush family, “plastic man” Romney, and execrable filth like John McCain (and the pink-frilled Lindsey Graham).  And how has the GOP reacted to this good fortune?  By doubling down on their anti-Trumpism, by obstructing what little the Grand Cuck Trump (this revealed after the election) wants to accomplish in a positive sense, by joining in with the absurd moral panic over “Russian interference,” by cucking to an extreme degree, by doing everything possible to throw away the fruits of the 2-16 electoral sweep an alienate and discourage Trump’s base.  So, now, I believe that they have awareness and understanding – it’s just that they are part of the same corruption, and always have been.  It’s always been a fraud, a scam, a con game run on the White American voter.  The GOP really isn’t in any predicament at all; they are simply playing the role assigned to them, playing it with relish.

Of course, all else being equal. The GOP would prefer to win elections, as they would like to enjoy the power and perks of elected office.  They also want to convince the rubes of the viability of the “two party system” and they want to keep the political donations and campaign contributions flowing in.  But winning is not an existential issue for them, but being anti-White is. If given a choice between winning with an explicitly pro-White agenda and losing as pandering cucks, they’d pick the latter every time. When the choice is put into those stark terms, the real Republican agenda comes into sharp focus.

Consider: after the startling electoral success of 2016, GOP cucks still pretend that association with right-wing populism will somehow damage the party – they will be ‘”toast.”

Still think they really want to win?

One reason is that the GOP has been complicit in the demographic changes that have put them “in between a rock and a hard place,” politically speaking. On the one hand, Republicans look at America’s growing colored population and see the need to appeal to that demographic. On the other hand, the GOP base of support is conservative White Americans, particularly right-of-center White men.  To pander to minorities runs the risk of alienating the base; to secure the base runs the risk of alienating the coloreds. Up to this point, the GOP strategy has been to pander to the colored minorities, while throwing “bones” to the base in the form of phony “implicit Whiteness” and “dog whistling” rhetoric with no real-life political consequences. Heretofore, the GOP has mastered feinting right during the primaries, running centrist in the general election, and, in the rare cases of GOP Presidential victories (since Ronnie Raygun, we have had only the two failed Bush men being elected), governing from the left. Base anger has been silenced by “they have nowhere else to go” “lesser of two evils” electoral considerations.

But now, the rise of Trump is an ill wind blowing in the direction of the GOP elites: the base is starting to awaken and will not be forever willing to “vote for lesser of two evils” and support anti-White leftist Republican candidates.

Whatever else Trump is or does, this alone justifies supporting his 2016 campaign, which I did.  Even if he is a completely self-interested phony, his reliance on right-wing populism “let the toothpaste out of the tube” and the System, however it may try, cannot get it all back in again, long-term.  They may win some battles here or there, tactical successes, but the tides of war will go against them.  By this, I mean the war to make multiculturalism work smoothly, and have White blithely accept their own dispossession.  The System may still win in the end, but their victory will be a Pyrrhic one, a bloody mess that will leave a nation essentially ungovernable long term as any major power on the world scene.  They may suppress right-wing populism short-term (and likely, not even that), but, like a bed penny, it’ll keep on popping up again.  Trump is a catalyst, a “John the Baptist” foreshadowing things to come.

But there is something else. The problem with Trump is seemingly not only his ideology of right-wing populism (real or fake), it is also because the Republican Establishment – with some justification – see Trump as an ill-informed, vulgar, obnoxious, childish buffoon, with no self-control and an embarrassing lack of gravitas.  Very well, but in response to those concerns I have two words: Pat Buchanan.

Like Trump, Buchanan ran for President as a right-wing populist Republican. In fact, there is considerable overlap in overt ideology between the two men’s campaigns. While lacking Trump’s “alpha jerk-boy” charisma, Buchanan has certain advantages that you would think would endear him to the GOP elites: Buchanan is a well-informed, articulate, religious man, with strong Establishment connections, and prior political experience in previous Republican administrations. Buchanan has always been an “inside-the-Beltway” man, and is not an obnoxious buffoon.

And how did the GOP elites deal with the more polished and political Buchanan?  With the same disdain and hysteria that they now reserve for “Der Trumpening.”  The Elite made it clear that they would never accept Buchanan as the nominee, they panicked over his early successes, they sabotaged his campaign (as I recall, they even prevented him from being on the ballot in some states), etc.  So, the case of Buchanan proves that the problem with Trump is not so much his repellent personal aspects, but his core of right-wing populism. Anything that appeals to Whites is anathema to the GOP, which is of course self-destructive given the nature of the GOP base (it is not for nothing that Sam Francis labeled the GOP “the Stupid Party”).

As stated above, the GOP would rather lose as anti-Whites than win as pro-White.  It’s a well-established trend dating back decades.

The point is that the GOP lost anyway with Bush and Dole in 1992 and 1996. While it is understandable that the incumbent would be favored in 1992, there was no excuse for favoring the “living mummy” “civil rights Republican” Dole over Buchanan in 1996. Favoring Buchanan would have solidified the GOP base and could have put the party in the direction of a right-wing populist track that could have genuinely benefited White Americans.

That is anathema to Establishment Republicans.

But, no. The elites sabotaged Buchanan and they suppressed right-wing populism for several electoral cycles. Now it has erupted in a more “virulent” form with Donald Trump. Instead of learning their lesson and understanding that the base cannot be taken for granted, instead of understanding that they need candidates that appeal to the base, the GOP elites are hell-bent on sabotaging Trump and suppressing right-wing populism for another couple of electoral cycles.

They may succeed but they are playing with fire.

They couldn’t stop Trump from winning, but they are fairly successful in teaming up with Democrats to block Trump’s ostensible agenda. Here, they are getting help from Trump himself, who betrays his base at every opportunity.  xxThere are some who say that there is evidence that Trump is sincere in his right-wing populism: he gave up his easy billionaire lifestyle to run for President. But that in and of itself means nothing.  It ignores issues of ego and the lust for (political) power. By analogy, we can ask why billionaires all don’t just ease up and enjoy the “good life,” why do most of them continue to strive, “wheel and deal,” obsess over money, and engage in rent-seeking behavior, including political lobbying, designed to further increase their wealth and power?  That’s the nature of the rich and powerful: they are never satisfied; they always want more (and that is one reason that they become rich and powerful to begin with).  If such people are given the opportunity to go into the history books as US President, would they eschew that opportunity?  Trump’s Presidential ambitions tell us nothing about his sincerity.  The fact that Trump ran as a right-wing populist may reflect his real views, or it may simply reflect his realization that the only way he could stand out from the established field of GOP cucks was to give the base the “red meat” that they were craving.  If Trump is really the shrewd businessman his admirers says he is, then he must have noticed the open political niche space to the political right of the GOP candidate field.  Trump’s sincerity would be better displayed by an honest and consistent effort on his part to fulfill his campaign promises.  That he is not doing; instead we get jackass tweeting, half-heated measures, backpedaling, a disgraceful waste of political capital, and waffling on issues like DACA.  If there is sincerity there, it is awfully hard to see.

Who will come after Trump?  Who will be the next right-wing populist?  As even worthless and weak Whites become more aggressive out of sheer desperation, who will they turn to next?  Someone more extreme and firebrand-populist compared to Trump to the same degree Trump is compared to Buchanan? 

It won’t be “the fire next time,” but it may well be “the Nazi next time.”  The GOP elites had better hope that their country clubs are well fortified indeed.

Will Trump’s constant betrayals and failures discourage his base?  Or, as Rich suggests, whatever the outcome of Trump, the base will only become more energized?  The latter, we hope.  But we must realize that the trauma of Trump has immunized the System against the “virus” of right-wing populism; they’ll be on their guard against it, and will try and nip any further manifestations in the bud.  Where they will fail, I believe, is that the System is, at its heart, anti-White; they cannot muster up any real “red meat” to satisfy a growing sense of White Identity Politics that will become ever more resistant to Democratic attempts to divert race with economics or GOP attempts at implicitly White “culture war” dog whistling.  The toothpaste is out of the tune, so to speak.

But, the System may not be able to win over the Trump base, but they’ll use their power to sabotage future political manifestations of right-wing populism.

In the movie The Day of the Jackal, the Jackal tells the OAS leaders: “Not only have your own efforts failed, but you’ve rather queered the pitch for everyone else.”  One can say that about Trump perhaps (and about the “movement” more generally, certainly).

Now, right-wing populism, essentially civic nationalism, is not the answer.  It is best a precursor or at least a stop gap, and at worst a diversion, a cul-de-sac, a competitor to what is needed – which is explicitly prop-White racial nationalism – White nationalism.  At this point in time, we can work to ensure that right-wing populism serves positive functions, as a precursor to White nationalism (the membrane separating the two is thin; it is one step from civic nationalism to racial nationalism, but an big step many do not make), or at least as a stop gap as racial nationalism begins to develop (Trump is in a sense a stop gap; one other benefit of his election, besides all “breaking the ice” for more extreme politics and increasing balkanization an chaos, is that he prevented a Clinton election that could have led to more repressive conditions for the development of racial nationalism – worse is not always better).

I would suggest that at this point, right-wing populism is best suited for Presidential campaigns and also for Senate and Governor races, and for lower level races in areas in which the White population is not sufficiently “prepared” for more radical approaches.  However, in selected areas and selected times, we should begin to consider explicitly White candidates – even racial nationalist WNs – ranging from school board elections all the way up to the US House of Representatives. Some successes there can lead to consideration of WNs for the higher level races.  The value of political WN campaigns exists regardless of the electoral outcome: promoting balkanization, recruiting, propaganda, organization, normalization of racial nationalist discourse and “pushing the envelope,” forcing the civic nationalists to get off the fence in one direction or another, a whole host of advantages.

Political campaigns would benefit from effective local organizing and vice versa.  It’s been said, and I believe it to be true, than in some locales, WNs love near each other but do not know of each other’s existence. Even if some fraction of these are kooks, freaks, defectives, Nutzis, fetishists, etc. there may still be a critical mass of useful like-minded people in certain areas.  The trick is to get them together, to work together, and to organize, safely, without the threat of infiltrators exposing them all.  How to do it is uncertain.  Existing meetings with their “extreme vetting” are ludicrous jokes; real extreme vetting would help, but I’m not sure that Der Movement has the competence or discipline to pull it off.  Anyone who is able to put together an effective plan for local organizing is going to be at an enormous advantage.  In the competition for racial nationalist leadership, those who can perform effectively will rise, and those who are laughably inept will fall.  

WNs cannot depend on a “man on white horse” civic cuck “hero” to save them.  The Nazi Next Time is not going to descend from Valhalla, complete with blessings of Saint Adolf; instead, the “demagogues” of the future will come to the fore as a result of hard work, discipline, and commitment.

This will, I believe, likely require a New Movement that replaces the clown show that currently exists.  I’m not sanguine about that, but this blog will continue to play the role of “loyal opposition.”  Racial nationalism is the future, but that future will only become actualized if we make it so.  

Future installments of this topic will be forthcoming when events and new ideas warrant; note as well there is overlap with the concept of Political EGI, as any pro-White leader who is worthwhile must incorporate (even if indirectly) the concept of genetic interests into their memetic toolkit.

Rotten Orange News: Culture Wars

Let’s get it straight.

I realize that the Right is not too bright, but it is still distressing that no one is pointing out the obvious: Trump is engaging in culture wars with the NFL and Columbus Day because he is aware that his base became enraged over Trump’s floating of DACA amnesty and his general betrayal of his voters.  Thus, Trump is trying to distract his base with a sideshow of symbolism; one troubling possibility is that he is trying to shore up his support with his base in anticipation of the next betrayal (with DACA or something else).  So, yes, Trump is “playing 4-D chess” but he is playing against his own supporters, who eventually will find themselves checkmated.

What about the idea of “trading DACA amnesty for immigration enforcement?”  Keep in mind that Trump started to backtrack from “few strings attached amnesty” only after his base loudly complained.  Keep in mind that the “amnesty now, enforcement later” model was completely discredit by the 1986 immigration legislation’s failure to follow through on the promises of enforcement. Keep in mind that there is no reason to hold enforcement hostage to amnesty – DACA amnesty or any other.  If you want to argue that the System won’t do enforcement without some sort of amnesty to “sweeten the pot,” then why doesn’t Trump insist on enforcement first?  Or just hold the line against amnesty and try to support right-wing populists running for Congress in 2018, to garner legislative support for an enforcement-only strategy?

Now, symbolism is important, as it affects morale which in turn affects the willingness of people to defend their interests.  However, symbolism cannot compare to actual accomplishment – getting things don. Celebrating Columbus Day means nothing if America turns Brown; anthem protests in the NFL means nothing is White Americans lose their country.

Instead of getting breathless excited about Trump’s shallow symbolism, how about holding him accountable to fulfilling his campaign promises?

Or is that a bridge too far for the Trump fanboys of the Right?

A Failure To Leverage Advantages

Inability of Whites to leverage any of the remaining economic and political influence they have.

There has been much hysteria about Negro athletes (and SJW supporters) “kneeling for the national anthem” – much sound and fury signifying nothing.  Without the willingness of the complainers to follow through on their convictions at least to the extent of not watching their precious football (America’s real religion), then who cares about all the pseudo-macho chest thumping?

More to the point – what connection is there to mainstream politics and then to the “movement” itself?

First, with respect to sports, the bottom line is this: if all the pathetic, jock-sniffing White sports fans who are upset at the “disrespect to the flag” would actually have the initiative and discipline to utilize the power of the purse, then the problem that enrages them would be very rapidly solved.  If a significantly large fraction of these fans would STOP going to the games, STOP watching the games on TV and cable, STOP buying related merchandise, STOP patronizing and talking and obsessing about football and other sports 24/7; if they would instead boycott the NFL, etc. and boycott any companies that advertise on TV during the games, then you would see some real effects, indeed. And I’m not talking about some paltry (and no doubt highly temporary) 10% decline in viewership, but a long-term decline of at least – an absolute bare minimum – of 50%, then you would see quite an effect.

Likewise, of a significant fraction of Whites would use their still considerable economic power to punish companies that promote anti-White memes and policies and use their still considerable voting numbers to reward pro-White politicians (if one could find any) and punish those (almost all) who are anti-White, then you would see real political change.  And no, blindly supporting the cuck fraud Trump does not constitute part of the solution; it is in fact part of the problem: Whites view politics like they do sports, there is “our team” and “their team,” a substitute for tribalism, in which leaders and groups are blindly followed regardless of what they do and what they represent and believe.

So, no, Whites in the end are incapable of abandoning their beloved Negro behemoths on the football field, and, no, they have no discipline to boycott anything, and, no, they can’t even restrain themselves from voting for phony cuckservatives just because they are, presumably, “the lesser of two evils.”

Likewise, White racial activists, predictably (and I did predict it), are unable to cut ties with failed “movement” leadership, even after the Hermansson fiasco.  It’s “business as usual” – move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here. If only a significant fraction of activists would stop giving handouts “(“donations”) to panhandling artists (“movement leaders”), stop patronizing their sites, stop buying their books and other paraphernalia, then the economic and social pressure would force real change in Der Movement.  But, no. Just like in sports, just like in mainstream politics, White racial activists are too lazy, feckless, conformist, hobbyist. Ignorant, and weak to actually act upon their convictions, control their behavior in order to control that of others, as take control of a “movement” hijacked by con men, grifters, the incompetent, the crazed, and those who simply want to sponge off the productivity of others while pretending to be defending the racial interests of those “others.”

What exactly does “movement leadership” have to do to be abandoned by the rank-and-file?  Make the same mistakes over and over again?  Demonstrate laughably poor judgment?  Make no progress for decades?  Fall for the whole “man on white horse” syndrome scam over and over again?  Be infiltrated, and then be humiliated by having the infiltrators participating in “vetting” or giving “movement” lectures about the dangers of infiltration?  Gambling away donations?  Using “membership dues” to engage in serial monogamy on the mountaintop?  All these things and more have happened, are happening, and will continue to happen, but, like smiling retards, the “movement” masses cheerfully continue to go along for the ride.  They’re being “taken for a ride,” indeed.” A ride to nowhere.  

So, it is all connected.  The same race that invented the modern world, landed on the moon, and was, at least in the past, fearsome warriors today cannot even be motivated to give up watching Negro behemoths collide on a football field, cannot have the discipline to refrain from re-electing a John McCain or a Lindsey Graham to the Senate over and over again, and certainly cannot refrain from being awestruck by the quota queen “rock stars” of Der Movement, said awe manifested in part by showering these incompetent and self-interested “rock stars” with the awed activists’ hard earned money.

More fundamentally: America (and all Western nations) has a System whose essential cogs are Made up of Whites, particularly White men.  If a significant portion of those cogs refuse to function, the System fails.  Likewise, if a significant portion of the “movement” rank-and-file refuse to go along with “business as usual,” then the whole rotten edifice of Der Movement comes crashing down.

But they just don’t have what it takes to do that, do they?

A race of weaklings and morons.