Category: man on white horse syndrome

Odds and Ends, 11/16/19

Various items.

As I often talk about “Type I” and “Type II” activists, here is a reminder of the principle involved.

Something to consider:

“If I had but one bullet and were faced by both an enemy and a traitor, I would let the traitor have it.”

― Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

Of course, this is metaphorical with respect to the present situation…by “have it” the traitors within the gates of racial activism should be shunned and defunded.  No more “D’Nations” for them.  HBDers are first among the traitors.

…appropriately dealing with violent white supremacist activity while not being perceived as painting with too broad a brush and impinging on legitimate right-wing political activity and free speech.

Err..you fundamentally dishonest System apparatchik….we have LONG SINCE PASSED the phase where “legitimate right-wing political activity and free speech” has been “impinged” upon.  The entire continent of Europe, as well as Canada, has ZERO free speech and the usual suspects want the same for the USA.  And what makes certain activity and speech “legitimate?”  As long as the Right sticks to talking about “capital gains tax rates?”  Probably that will soon be labeled “White supremacist hate speech” as well.  After all, why don’t privileged Whites want to pay more taxes to help Coloreds?  Racism!  White fragility!  Note to System shills…you have already lost the narrative.  And thank you for alerting us to your concern. We’ll make sure to constantly add that your agenda is specifically anti-White. We have our narrative as well. But, the major difference is ours is true.

A delusional letter (at the end):

Change in percentage of white children in public schools is a proxy for immigration-driven population change. As I wrote in September, white children were 81% of America’s public school students in 1972, 63% in 1997, expected to be 45% in 2022, and, assuming the same pace of annual decline, 27% by 2047.

This is trouble for everyone, especially the white population. A simple search engine “experiment” illustrates. Education Week has a paid circulation of 50,000 education professionals. I searched EdWeek.org using the term “whiteness.”

“Whiteness” is a word used with increasing frequency in progressive circles, particularly universities. The term conveys racial animus toward the white population. The EdWeek whiteness search turned up this 9-18-19 commentary: “’Mr. Turner, Are You Racist?’ A White Teacher Grapples With His Privilege.”

That search also produced news about the National Education Association. The NEA is a 2.9 million-member teachers professional association. The North Carolina Association of Educators is an affiliate. At its July convention, the NEA agreed to “incorporate the concept of ‘white fragility’ into NEA trainings and staff development, literature, and other communications.”

Concepts like “white privilege,” “white fragility,” and others highlighting problematic “whiteness” were unknown a few years ago. Imagine concepts that will be justifying educational, governmental, and corporate policy by 2047. If it’s bad now, how bad will it be in 28 years?

More on K-12’s ever-intensifying diversity challenge: A prominent education historian, Diane Ravitch, wrote a best seller in 2003: The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn. One revelation: hundred-page “bias and sensitivity guidelines” textbook publishers use to screen textbook content. The publishers want to avoid offending identity groups. Offending a sensitive group could derail approval of a textbook by state textbook adoption committees. At risk: millions in sales.

The mother lode of whiteness ideology, however, are America’s universities. I recently read The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture (2018) by Heather Mac Donald, Manhattan Institute fellow and frequent guest of Tucker Carlson. For a sense of The Diversity Delusion, watch her 38-minute YouTube interview with the Hoover Institution’s Peter Robinson. It’s had almost 500,000 views since April.

America is in a pickle. Its institutions, its leaders — all of them — have failed us for decades. But strange things can happen to disrupt disastrous trends/policies. One was the election of Donald Trump. Another would be his re-election.

Tom Shuford

Sure!  With the re-election of Donald Trump, his DOJ can start persecuting people like Shuford for ”hate speech.”  MAGA!  Pepe! Kek!  A sincere man of genuine greatness!

Justice for the Embittered

Fisking Johnson.

Laugh at this, emphasis added:

First, what does it even mean to ban women from a largely anonymous online movement, which lacks any barriers to entry or standards of membership?

Sound like the “extreme vetting” at a Counter-Currents meeting. Isn’t that part of the problem Greg?  That there are no “barriers to entry or standards of membership?” Shouldn’t those things exist, and be based on merit and behavior and not on an affirmative action program or the mirror test (if someone can fog a mirror held up to their nose, they’re in)?

We can’t ban women from the internet.

Too bad, huh?

We can’t ban women from reading our websites, listening to our podcasts, watching our YouTube videos, etc. We can’t ban women from writing for our websites…

Actually you could ban known women from writing, which you choose not to do.

…commenting on our websites, or donating to them if they simply use pen names. (For all I know, the person who sent in the question is a woman.)

Well, we certainly don’t want to decrease potential “D,Nations” now, do we?

Of course some parts of the movement can exclude women. I don’t think we should accept the essentially feminist assumption that all organizations and realms of society should admit women, much less aim for male/female parity. I also think that it is quite natural for radical politics to attract more men than women. And just as combat units and police forces function better without women, so might some White Nationalist political organizations.

Uh, yes.

But even if it were possible to entirely exclude women from White Nationalist politics, doing so would be dumb and self-defeating.

Because Greg, with much personal experience in dealing with women, says so. The defenders of women need to answer certain questions.  Why do men who are serial killers, mass murderers, men who kill their families, when in prison, get inundated with love letters – often containing photos of the nude or scantily-clad nubile women who wrote the letters – and pleading offers of marriage?  Why do men with a criminal record have more female sexual partners than law-abiding men?  A sex hard-wired for crazed sociopathy is not the best material for a “movement” desperate for an increase in personal quality.  Think about it.

If women want to contribute their money, ideas, time, and social capital to the movement, that makes us stronger, not weaker. Beyond that, we are never going to actually win unless we can convince a substantial percentage of the female population that we represent their real interests. And we will never do that if we allow the tone of the movement to be set by embittered misogynists, to say nothing of people who proclaim “White Sharia” and “Islam is Right About Women.”

Yeah, Greg, those memes – that I agree are stupid – are promoted by people who you enthusiastically declared as “the new voices of WN 3.0.”  What does that say about your judgment – or absolute lack thereof?

Leftists love to dismiss realism about racial differences as racial hatred. But that’s not necessarily true. Feminists love to dismiss realism about sexual differences as misogyny, the hatred of women. But that’s not necessarily true either.

Yes, see above.  Women: A sociopathic sex that rewards the worst among men with the most sexual access.

However, just as there really are people in our movement who hate other races, there are people in our movement who genuinely hate women.

Just as the goal of our movement should be to drain the swamp of diversity in which race-hate breeds, we should also try to address the underlying causes of hatred between the sexes.

And just as we will not achieve our goal in the racial sphere if we allow simple race hatred to define our movement, we will not achieve our goals in the sexual sphere by allowing misogynists to set the tone either.

Are the “goals in the sexual sphere” set by O’Meara and Brendon/Brandon?

White Nationalists are mature enough to recognize that hatred between the races and sexes is the inevitable product of the current system. We also need to be mature enough to recognize that indulging embittered haters will destroy any chance to rectify our problems.

Crazy and bitter!  Johnson’s own obsessive hatred of Richard Spencer, is of course, not based on any bitter personal animus but just plain good sense!  Criticize Johnson though and you are just plain nuts!

Second, talking about excluding all women because of doxers like Katie McHugh makes no sense. Should the movement also exclude all men, because some men are doxers as well? That would put an end to 100% of doxings, but it would also put an end to the movement itself.

And we can’t have that.

Surely we can be a bit more surgical about excluding certain types of people to minimize such problems in the future.

Yes, Greg: Hermansson, Lewis, Brandon/Brendan, Pilleater, most of the people you currently have writing for your blog…

Third, the very same people who want to blame women for problems in the movement also often deny that women exercise any moral agency. But if women have no agency, then they bear no responsibility either. But clearly somebody is to blame for these operational security and public relations disasters, and by their own logic, misogynists would have to blame men.

Yes, exactly, we blame men like Johnson who allowed all sorts of tragicomic lapses in operational security.  We blame Steadman as well.

And in truth, men bear a lot of the blame.

Indeed.

By all accounts, McHugh, Samantha, and another unnamed woman who doxed Coach Finstock were not ordinary women. They were Alt-Right scene groupies. Like rock groupies, they were attracted to an overwhelmingly misogynistic subculture. Women who are drawn to such environments are surely high in masochism and low in self-worth. They then worked their way through the scene, passing over nice guys until they ended up with manipulative sociopaths.

Please Greg tell us – which “movement leader” is not a manipulative sociopath?

But when they realized that masochistic self-indulgence was not making them happy, they bailed out.

Then, once they had become sufficiently embittered to feel justified in harming innocent people, they went to the enemy and started doxing people, including people who had only been kind to them. This is the sort of pure evil that makes people dream of the eternal fires of hell to restore justice to the world.

Oh, yes, and some of us dream of such fires to restore justice to racial activism.  Feeling warm yet Greg?

What makes such evil possible? I think a good part of it can be explained by bitterness. Bitterness takes root when someone is wronged and does not receive justice.

Hmm…then Sallis was wronged and did not receive justice.  Good of you to admit it Greg.

Bitterness turns into a kind of neurosis. Embittered people vent their wrath not on the people who wronged them, but on people who didn’t wrong them but merely remind them of the people who did.

Absolute self-serving bullshit.

And if such people have any pangs of conscience, bitterness easily silences them: “Why should I care about these people’s suffering? Where were they when I was suffering? Who cared about me?”

Nonsense.

So how do we lessen the likelihood of such disasters in the future?

First, we really need to dispel the atmosphere of misogyny in the movement, which attracts damaged people of both sexes. Race realism–yes. Race hate–no. Sex realism–yes. Hatred between the sexes–no. Our movement will never win unless we treat such hatreds as social problems to be solved. And we cannot credibly promise to solve them in society as a whole if we allow them to run rampant in our own ranks.

But, hey, Anglin is one of the new voices of WN 3.0, and don’t you forget it!  Johnson is a buffoon.

Also: Hatred against White ethnics is A-OK.

Second, we need to exclude groupies. But we also need to exclude the kinds of sociopathic males they gravitate toward.

You mean like Jeelvy, you hypocrite?

…I am a bad worker. I am often late for work, and when I do arrive, I arrive with the insomniac’s world-contemptuous scowl overlaid against a stubbled jowl. I resolve office politics with threats of violence, and I’ve been known to disappear for hours on end, only to return in a state of mild inebriation. I write monograph-length critiques of TV shows from ten years ago during office hours… my successes are due more to innate charisma and an ability to charm people into forgiving my worst offenses rather than effort or passion. You have to be either crazy or my mother to hire me – in fact, the latter is my employer.

If we stand for the restoration of Western civilization, then we stand for monogamy not polygamy. We stand for fidelity, not adultery. We stand for healthy relationships, not pathological ones. Which means that playboys, sluts, adulterers, and abusers are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Ho ho!  Is that why your response to Pilleater’s complaints was to chuckle about how if Brandon/Brendan thinks some hapless male meeting attendee is “cute,” he’s just going to “flirt” with them?

If someone you know is playing the field, using and discarding movement groupies, he is playing with fire. He is putting his own short-term gratification ahead of the health of our cause. That’s a problem, and you need to say something.

Say something…like Pilleater did.

Third, we need to drain the swamp where bitterness and wrath breed. We have to do something when people in our movement wrong one another. We need to have some sympathy for victims of injustice, even for victims who are not entirely innocent. And the best form of sympathy is to give them justice, which means there have to be punishments for wrongdoers.

So, Greg, when will you resign from the “movement?”

People who dox others are evil and deserve no sympathy today. But if they had received sympathy and justice when they were wronged, things may have worked out differently, and we would all be better off.

The Alt Right in America crashed and burned because it was run by a mafia of drunkards, druggies, sociopaths, and buffoons, as well as swarms of remora-like fanboys, sycophants, and enablers.

Greg, don’t be so hard on yourself.

I fear that we are going to be hearing a lot more such stories from Samantha and people like her for years to come. But the movement for white survival will not falter as long as we treat such disasters as opportunities to learn rather than excuses to quit.

This comically self-unaware post indicates that Greg hasn’t learned yet.

Speaking of women, let us listen to that philosopher Lee Priest.

The HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, manipulated behind the scenes by Jews, continues onward, as I predicted.

More of an ethnoimperialist invading the nation of another people, demanding sexual access to their women.

Jews promote alien immigration into Italy, just as do dreadlocked German whores, Norwegians, and Richard Gere.  The only thing Lind got wrong with his analysis of “American Tribes” is that he limited it to the USA.  The Nord-Jew-Colored Alliance is international.

While the disgusting “human being” Trump celebrates putting Black criminals back on the streets, Proud Boys members are being sent to prison for self-defense, and the Trump DOJ persecutes the Rise Above Movement.  But he’s a sincere man of greatness, and don’t you forget it!

Victory is inevitable, right Greg?

The System is Killing White Men

Some items.


The System is killing White men (emphasis added).

“What’s interesting is that Hispanics and blacks who started off at lower levels of life expectancy, they have continued to make progress. They’re not in the deaths of despair category for the most part,” Brookings Institution’s senior fellow Carol Graham told Yahoo Finance, adding that “The entire trend is driven by premature mortality among less-than-college-educated whites, mainly in the middle-aged years. That’s a pretty big marker that something’s really wrong.”

Wrong?  Hey!  I thought the destruction of the White man was a feature of the System, not a bug.  Shouldn’t the attitude of these types be “job well done, full steam ahead?”

Women and blacks became more optimistic over time, beginning in the 1970’s when gender and civil rights improved,” Graham wrote in the report. “The one group that experienced drops in optimism around the same time were less-than-college-educated white males, not coincidentally when the decline in manufacturing began.

What mendacity. Note how they try to blame it all on economic reasons, even though they say that for Negroes and Yeastbuckets, they “became more optimistic over time, beginning in the 1970’s when gender and civil rights improved” – and that was precisely the time that optimism among White men declined.  That’s the key to “not coincidentally,” not the hand-waiving about “decline in manufacturing.” Economic concerns may play a factor, but not the major role.  As evidence that it is not all about economics, see the following form the same article:

“We uncovered those death patterns,” Graham says. “What struck me is that poor African-Americans were three times as likely to be optimistic about the future as poor whites,” Graham said. “The metric that really stands out is not sort of happy, unhappy. Happy today doesn’t matter a whole lot. It’s hope for the future or lack thereof that’s really linked with premature mortality.”

Gee, the lack of economic opportunities are not harming those “poor African-Americans” who see hope for a future in a System that literally worships them, while poor Whites, and all Whites, particularly men, view the future with despair, as they are the “devil” of the System. Indeed, opinion polls for Whites in general show they are more pessimistic than Coloreds about the future; even “highly educated Whites” are more pessimistic.

Don’t blame it all on the economy, liars.  It’s more about race and culture.


Read this excellent Hood piece.  Emphasis added:

In contrast to leftists, President Trump focuses on public opinion. He talks big but does little. He cites favorable polls to prove his greatness. His campaigning and governing styles are contradictory. He advocates policies he doesn’t implement, such as an executive order on birthright citizenship, a remittance tax, or a flag burning ban. Rather than legitimizing ideas, this discredits them. Instead of encouraging supporters, he betrays them.

But Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness, right Greg?

It’s time to rethink the Overton Window. The truth is already on our side. Many people already agree with us on most issues. If that were enough, we’d have already won.

In general, yes. With respect to specifics, such as HBD and racial fetishistic dogma, no.

Instead of trying to shock public opinion, we should focus on demanding platform access, creating financial networks, and building institutions and communities the media can’t destroy. Instead of focusing on ideology, we should focus on logistics. We need to change conditions on the ground and make it easier for white advocates to organize. 

I agree on all, and this is very consistent with ideas I have proposed here previously.  There needs to be an emphasis on actually achieving concrete objectives, rather than nitpicking on the typical “movement” ideological and memetic obsessions. We need to fight social pricing, ensure access to the public square (both digital and analog), and real community building (which everyone talks about, but no one actually does anything about).

Otherwise, we risk ending up like Georgia Clark, pleading for help from leaders who have already abandoned us.

Leaders such as the sincere God Emperor of genuine greatness, Antifa Don Trump.

Now, I’ve already spent much time and effort here deconstructing the abysmal stupidity of extant ancestry testing, but it is worthwhile to read this, which in some ways compares favorably to some of the points I’ve made here in the past.

An amusing comment that I’ve found online (emphasis added): 

So basically the ancestry DNA test claims I’m 58% Great Britain! I am not even from Great Britain, I’m German I live in Great Britain though

Whew!  It’s good he doesn’t live in Uganda, imagine what results he would have gotten then!

In all seriousness, AncestryDNA may be the worst test out there…either that or 23andMe…both are borderline D/F grades in my opinion, absolutely horrid. AncestryDNA specializes in providing bizarre data points that overlap with zero. 23andMe isn’t much better. They’re competing for last place, putting a lot of effort there. Probably using the raw data for health-related issues may be the best use of that nonsense.

The lack of proper parental populations for Europe is a major problem.  I believe that this is a fundamental reason why the results for European-derived peoples seemingly get worse and more absurd every time that these companies “update” their tests. These companies seem to be going “PC” and adding reference populations from non-White, non-European populations; and since results are modeled based on the available reference population samples, the more non-White references you add, the greater the probability  of assigning ancestral components to those populations. Indeed, there seems to be a correlation between the politically-motivated stress on adding “diverse” parentals and increasingly absurd results. We need more parental populations from Europe – where most of the people using the rests derive their ancestry from. 

Let’s take an example. Imagine a testing company wants to determine the ancestral proportions of Iraqis. They model the “admixture” under four scenarios. One – a large reference population from Iraq; many Iraqi samples as parentals. Two – few samples from Iraq, but many samples from Jordan, Germany, and Ghana. Three – the same as two, but with the addition of a large number of reference samples from South Asia. Four – the same as two, but with the addition of a moderate number of samples from Turkey and a large expansion of the samples from sub-Saharan Africa. Now, under those four scenarios, will the results from a given set of Iraqis be the same, or even very similar? Hardly. They would be markedly different. Only when there is a significant number of reference samples from the specific population of the person or persons being tested will the results be reasonably accurate, and even then the results can be altered when there are significant changes in the types and numbers of other reference populations used to model the “admixture.” These are facts that cannot be responsibly evaded by the testing companies, although they’ll like to pretend that this is not a factor.
The current state of commercially available ancestry testing means that such testing is virtually useless for significant numbers of European-derived people. Actually, less than worthless, as the results are absolute incorrect. Again, the major advantage of this testing is using the data to make an “end run” around the paternalism of the medical community and getting a handle on health issues – assuming that the data are accurate, which is an issue that needs to be confirmed if something “bad” is discovered.

They’re Lying to You

Can’t get their stories straight.

From a previous post, we remember this nonsense.

Now, here’s a key part:

There is a right-sizing to assimilating and naturalizing other peoples. Rome did well with assimilating Europeans with Indo-European/Early Farmer genetic stock, had more problems when it came to Indo-European/Western Hunter Gatherers from the north, and they didn’t assimilate Jews at all.

The implications of that is that the Romans (and other European peoples they assimilated well; for example, the other peoples that were located in what today is Italy, as well as the Greeks) were predominantly “Early European Farmer,” and these peoples were distinct from the more problematical northerners who were predominantly “Western Hunter Gatherer” (with low levels of “Indo-European” in both). This is consistent with the idea of the HBD-Nordicists of a North-South European difference in place dating back thousands of years, since the Neolithic.

Ahh…but the mainstream Nordicists of Der Movement, the Kempian Nordicists, have long told us that the ancient peoples of the Mediterranean – Romans, Greeks, etc. – were Nordic.  The original Roman stock were akin to Dolph Lundgren in a toga.  Except, now, the HBD-Nordicists say, well, that’s not the case, the folks in the togas were “Early Farmers” and the Dolph Lundgrens were “Western Hunter Gatherers.”  No, no, a thousand times, no!  What would Arthur Kemp, David Duke, and Ash Donaldson say?  Blasphemy!  March of the Titans!  Pierce weeps!  Who We Are!  

Taking all of these fetishists as a whole – and they should be taken as a whole since they post on the same blogs and are in fundamental agreement on most things and won’t even openly acknowledge the contradiction outlined above – we can see that they cannot get their story straight.  And when folks cannot get their story straight, what does that tell you? That they are LYING to you. Der Movement has been openly lying to you about race for many decades.  Lie after lie after lie and now they cannot keep their lies straight, so they practice cognitive dissonance and pretend that their views are not internally inconsistent. Assuming that they are not so stupid (or deluded by blind fanatical dogmatic faith in their fetishistic belief systems) that they cannot realize the contradiction, then they must hold you in utter contempt, assuming that you won’t notice it (to be fair to them, most “activists” actually do not notice it).

Also note how this guy uses the term “Early Farmer” while the correct term used in the literature is “Early European Farmer” – have to delegitimize the “European bonafides” of that group, eh?  Wipe that sweat off your forehead, fetishist.

Sweden’s native population contains the most Western Hunter Gatherer DNA, and Sicily’s people have the most Early Farmer genetic material. Sweden’s population is highly individualistic, but operates with a societal consensus, while Sicily has strong families but little cooperation at the societal level.

Gee, you think that the long history of invasion and foreign domination in Sicily may have something to do with it as well?  Also, there is my theory of genetic heterogeneity, which builds upon the observation that diversity decreases the willingness to invest in collective social goods. This may hold true even in certain mono-ethnic societies, if the ethnies in question possess significant genetic heterogeneity, which is processed by members of that society through the proxy of phenotypic heterogeneity. The more different members of an ethny seem to each other, the less their willingness to invest in the broader society, and the greater the urge to invest in more “safe” concentrations of genetic interest, such as the family. Southern Europe has greater genetic heterogeneity than the North. Of course, ethnocentrism may play a role as well; although the North is more homogeneous, there are still some Bromstad/Bjork types there, who apparently do not trigger any anti-collective urges.  It is no doubt complex.

I believe that this Jewish ability to hijack altruistic punishment is unstable and only temporary. It is clear to this author that the single largest ethnic conflict in American history is that between Yankees and Jews. So far, the Jews have practiced aggression against the Yankee without receiving any response, but this situation will not continue indefinitely. People will always eventually respond to attacks.

Completely insane delusion.  Actually, according to the Lind thesis of American politics, the “Yankees” have been the most important and enthusiastic allies of the Jews in the destruction of America, and the unleashing of the Black/Brown plague on middle class and working class White Americans.  No, the single largest ethnic conflict is that of the Jewish-Yankee-Negro alliance vs. the White Southerner-White ethnic alliance, precisely what Lind outlined.  “Movement” heroes like John Lindsay, Hubert Humphrey, Elizabeth Warren, and Greta Thunberg are clearly on the side of Jewish interests, and all the sweaty fetishism and padded cell delusions can’t change that fact.

Stop lying, liars.

And if these guys truly believe that these differences between Europeans are so important, and if they will be honest enough to acknowledge the failures of the WHG-enriched “movement leadership,” why don’t they consider that it may be useful to get at least some input and leadership from more EEF-enriched individuals?  Perhaps some new perspectives would be useful?  But no.  They’d rather reinforce their monopoly than let others have a hand in the endeavor.

Yeah…let’s not disguise it.  First, all these types were foaming at the mouth that Trump the “God Emperor” was “the last chance for White America” back when I was openly calling Trump a race cuck and a buffoon and when Strom was telling you not to believe Trump. Second, and infinitely worse, Greg Johnson is STILL saying that Trump was/is “sincere” and is a “man of genuine greatness.”  That’s your WHG-enriched “leadership.”  Apparently, “social cohesion” is built by being painfully naïve, being wrong all of the time, and/or gaslighting readers in an attempt to avoid accountability for your endless failures and monumental errors of judgment.

Odds and Ends, 10/9/19

In all cases, emphasis added.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day: 

In reality, people in marketing are mostly shiftless sociopaths

Yes indeed:

After the war, he developed a successful career in journalism and advertising.

You see, I don’t always disagree with Zman.

Never forget, the subhuman slime Donald “sincere man of genuine greatness” Trump refuses to act against Antifa (although he’s monitoring the situation…very closely), while, at the same time, his DOJ persecutes his own supporters who are victims of Antifa. The incident linked to above took place in Canada, but of course worse has been occurring, with regularity, in America.

While I am sometimes critical of Andrew Joyce, in general I agree with him more often than not. In fact, he is one of the best and most articulate anti-Johnsonian voices in Der Movement.  In the following, he needles the petty nationalist ethnonationalists, and exposes as a lie the ethnonationalist fraud that asserts that the UK is beset by immigration only because it is part of “the pan-European EU” – 

I must make myself clear. I am ambiguous about the actual meaning of Brexit. I firmly believe that the day after Brexit there will be violence in the streets, chaos in hospitals, resources and infrastructure will be stretched to breaking point, and government will be totally ineffective. Britain will be a disaster. But this will also be the case the day before Brexit, just as it has been the case in Britain ever since the multicultural project was embarked upon. Britain’s most pressing crisis has little or nothing to do with a series of transnational treaties binding it to other European member states. Britain has already imbibed the most potent of toxins, globalism and multiculturalism, and these toxins will remain in the system with or without supervision or government from Brussels. My point is that Brexit will not cure Britain of any of its ills. It will not stop or slow immigration, it will not halt cultural decline or the march of Cultural Marxism, it will not stop Britain being ruled by elites far removed from the life and environment of the everyday Briton. More than a departure from European bureaucracy, Britain needs a new departure from itself.

The ethno-nationalist looks at the Brexit debate and what does he see? He sees a choice between the migrant-welcoming EU globalist behemoth and … what? For a start, he sees “the most ethnically diverse” British government in history, led by a Prime Minister whose first act in office was to rule out setting any limits on the numbers of immigrants flooding Britain. This places Brexit voters in something of a quandary because the primary motivation for the Brexit vote was concern about immigration (see the excellent research of University of Kent’s Matthew Goodwin). What they are now faced with is a Brexit that won’t do anything to change immigration other than reduce the numbers of Poles and increase the numbers of Indians, Pakistanis and others from the Third World.

Trump and Johnson, 10/8/19

Frauds and buffoons.

Many people on the Dissident Right voice the opinion that Donald Trump needs to lose in 2020. Trump didn’t build the Wall, he didn’t reduce immigration, he bows before Israel, he passed terrible criminal justice reform, he hasn’t dealt with tech censorship, he shows no concern for persecuted Rightists, he may go to war with Iran, he can’t stop posting cringe, and so on and so forth.

But he’s a man of genuine greatness, and don’t you forget it!

If you think censorship and deplatforming are bad now, just wait until the state pushes it under President Elizabeth Warren. 

Cue Counter-Currents articles telling us that we need more women like Elizabeth Warren and Durocher in The Unz Review telling us that Warren is of great benefit for all humanity.

The “Alt Right” became a major phenomenon due to Trump. 

Hey!  I thought it was the other way around? Didn’t the WN 2.0 heroes of the Alt Right “meme Trump into the Presidency?”

Dissident Right publications and organizations had existed for years prior to Trump, but few paid attention to them. 

Unlike now, right?

Journalists and politicians started talking about us when we provided an intellectual basis and online support network to Trumpism. Thousands of people came over to our ideas due to this association. Much of this attention was given in an attempt to derail Trump, but it had the unintended effect of empowering the Dissident Right and making us grow exponentially. We were able to punch above our weight with memetic warfare and by offering online support to the Trump campaign.

Delusion.

The “Trump must lose” crowd insist that censorship is worse under Trump than it ever was under Barack Obama. That’s undoubtedly true, but they forget that it’s increased with the aim of derailing the Trump phenomenon. The President isn’t the one pushing the censorship…

He’s just doing nothing about it.

…it’s major corporations and journalists who want to ensure that Trump is not allowed to enact a nationalist program…

Trump’s nationalist program: Insane delusion.

…and moreover that America never again elects a nationalist. 

Again?  AGAIN?  Counter-Currents is the sewer of WN.

Liberal elites want us silenced because they see us as a threat and acknowledge that our memes helped Trump win.

Oh, there it is. The grand lie of the Alt Right.

The troubles we currently face are our growing pains as a dissident movement. 

Having an incompetent affirmative action leadership of freaks, perverts, morons, and grifters has nothing to do with it, no sir!

Arguably, the best reason to want Trump to win reelection is the persecution issue. It’s true that Trump hasn’t done enough on this issue. 

You think?

Big Tech continues to ban his own supporters and suffer no consequences, even though the President could use his executive powers to hit back. His Department of Justice has also unjustly pursued Right-wingers, such as the Rise Above Movement (RAM), while doing little about the antifa.

But he’s sincere, I tell ya, sincere in his genuine greatness.

You may think this is bad, but it would get a hell of a lot worse under a Democrat. A Democratic president would likely pressure tech companies and banks to deny all service to suspected “White Nationalists.” Association with the Dissident Right could result in the loss of your gun rights under a Democratic president’s new red flag laws. The Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security would be ordered to make White Nationalism their primary target, and investigate and prosecute many non-violent identitarians.

Note to retard.  Even if all this is true – guess what?  Trump can only get re-elected once, never mind that he’s old and decrepit.  You are going to get a Democrat (or, less likely, an equally bad Neocon Republican) in 2024 if not 2020.  Are you prepared?  What will you do with four more years of Trump?  More drunken podcasts?  More feuding?  More infiltrated meetings?  More homosexual harassment of flabby bisexual activists?  More grifting for “D’Nations?”

Not only will the persecution not turn us into martyrs in the eyes of white America, but we won’t have access to the platforms we need to spread our message. 

He just said no one is interested in us or our plight, but, by golly, we need dem dere platforms to spread our message!  Send in money to Counter-Currents!  Remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!

The Rightists who want a Democratic administration the most will be the first to lose their social media accounts and domain hosting. Nobody can hear your message if you’re offline.

Oh, don’t we know that under Trump.

The only person who might possibly put a stop to tech censorship and bias is Trump. 

Delusion.

He has made it clear that he wants to protect online speech and punish tech giants.

Yes, he’s looking into it. He’s looking at it very closely. In fact, he might even tweet about it.

 A Republican-sponsored bill exists in the Senate that would target Big Tech’s special immunities and require tech giants to prove that they operate as neutral political forums. If the Republicans win in 2020, they might pass it. 

Why didn’t they do it 2016-2018?

Even if you believe that Trump is a total failure, it’s undeniable that he’s the only hope against tech tyranny.

He’s a total failure, but he’ll be successful against Big Tech.

Our movement’s main objectives should be to build communities and institutions. 

And to support Greg Johnson’s lifestyle.

A Democratic administration will make those objectives harder to achieve; a second Trump term at least offers the hope that we will gain federal protection. 

Federal protection!  Counter-Currents – meet padded cell.

A 2020 GOP win should be hoped for solely for this reason. It goes without saying that no Democrat will stand up for our rights.

Rightists who want Trump to lose believe that it would send a message: Trump has failed us so badly that he must be punished at the polls. If you cuck, you lose elections. The problem with this view is that the people who make this argument don’t have a large real-world constituency. There are no Dissident Right organizations of any significant size. 

Whose fault is that? Oh, that’s right, the Quota Queens.

Further, they can’t host events, can’t establish institutions, and in many cases they can’t even get along with other people in the same circles…

Doesn’t that very precisely describe Greg Johnson?

Yet, in their minds, they somehow influence the choices of large numbers of voters. This is a fantasy. 

Oh yes. Pot meet kettle.

There are probably a few thousand wignats, at most, and they are spread out all over the country – too sparsely to make a difference even in the battleground states. Moreover, nobody wants to be associated with our milieu. Republicans have won lots of elections without courting the National Socialist Movement’s votes; why will 2020 be any different?

That paragraph is completely inconsistent with everything else this shallow, juvenile retard wrote in all of the text that preceded it.

Over ninety percent of Republicans approve of Donald Trump – one of the highest numbers in the party’s history. There are no real cracks in his coalition apart from among white suburbanites – a demographic which does not get its news from Gab. If Trump loses, the message the party will take away is that he lost because he was too racist, not because he was too cucked. The party establishment is eager to return to the pre-Trump days and pass an immigration amnesty. Plenty of Republican politicians are more than ready to condemn Trump and his platform if he loses. They will return to the days of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, and double down on ethnomasochism, neoconservative foreign policy, and economic buffoonery. The GOP will be far worse in a post-Trump landscape.

As I said, what happens in 2024, you short-sighted buffoon?

Ironically, given the wignats’ kneejerk hatred for the man, the only person who could effectively fight back against renewed GOP cuckery is Trump himself. In the event of a loss, he’s likely to return to his 2016 self and blame the party’s establishment. He will insist that he was right about immigration, foreign policy, and trade from the beginning, and push for the party to remain true to his America First promises. Trump would make it his life’s mission to uphold the righteousness of his campaign agenda and attack any who besmirch it. He will still have most of the party’s loyalty, and Republicans will not have the luxury of ignoring him. He’s not just gonna disappear into Mar-a-Lago if he loses. 

No, he’ll be in prison.

It won’t be the end of the world if Trump loses, and we will adjust to the new circumstances if that occurs. 

Which invalidates the entire essay.

The Dissident Right simply needs to realize that our fortunes are tied to Trump’s, and we would be weaker without him. 

Raving madness.

Yes, he has done a lousy job of turning our ideas into policy, but no American in recent decades has done more to advance them metapolitically. 

Sure!  Kanye West and Kim Kardashian make policy, so it’s a metapolitical win!

Immigration restriction, non-interventionism, and economic protectionism are all now part of the Republican mainstream thanks to Trump. More Americans than ever agree with the Dissident Right, and that number will continue to grow if he wins reelection. 

They all agree, but, at the same time, they are completely uninterested in us and our plight.  

The Republican Party will further adapt itself to Trump’s 2016 campaign message, and neocons and libertarians will feel even more unwelcome in the party.

They can always join the Alt Right.

If you don’t buy that, you should at least understand that Trump and the Republicans are the only ones who will not unleash the full force of the state against us. 

Sure!  Ask RAM!

We might still deal with tech censorship and deplatforming under President Trump; we never will with a Democrat.

Huh?

Trump may be too cringey for some to bear, but he’s our only option in 2020. We lose much and gain nothing if he loses.

Didn’t Johnson write that a Trump loss was 100% certain?  If so, what’s the purpose of this essay?

Experto crede does not apply here:

Greg Johnson

Posted October 4, 2019 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

The movie is a text. If you want to assume that certain details are just meaningless accidents, that atrikes me as a lazy way to interpret it. There is obviously aomething wrong in this marriage. So yes, I am going with the idea that two healthy people with one seven-year-child have something aberrent in their marriage. Maybe liberalism is that aberration. But I am going with marital problems.

Thus speaks the expert on male-female heterosexual relationships and marriage.  Can he become any more of a buffoon?  And he’s getting so excited over this he can’t distinguish “a” from “s” on the computer keyboard.

He’s a man of genuine greatness!

See this.  Zman, being a rather limited commentator, doesn’t bring the discussion to its natural conclusion – once America as a whole dives below 50% White, it is finished.  China has to only wait.  By then, the Chinese will probably be developed enough, overall, so that their internal consumption can provide the demand for their productive capacity, thus maintaining their economy.  A future America, as described, probably won’t have much of a demand for anything except basketballs, bananas, and tacos.

Your disgusting face is an aberration, you Levantine freak.  Contra the HBDers, Ginsburg’s entire ethny has a genetic load that makes Adam Pearson look like the Overman.

Speaking of the HuWhite folk.  An excellent Strom podcast/essay – albeit disturbing and disgusting.  One wonders if the online post that started the “fetish”- or at least the explosion of interest – was genuine, or planted by the usual Levantine suspects in order to trigger sicker self-destruction from parasite-infected Whites. Indeed, one wonders how many “spontaneous” self-destructive fads and fetishes are being planted, intentionally and with malice aforethought, to target Whites, particularly young Whites, with harmful memes. But, hey, the parasites are HuWhite, so it’s all A-OK! Let’s all write some more articles for Unz (question – are those contributions paid?) and it’s all good!  

Kevin, when are you going to initiate a full-throated attack on the Judeophilic HBD cult?

Odds and Ends, 9/20/19

More of the same.

Yes, he’s an “abiding influence” and all, but you’ll reject, and constantly attack, the central theme of his work.

Ah…but Gottfried “gets it wrong” only from your perspective.  Gottfried is a Jew, so from that perspective, it’s business as usual.

Note:

Exile
Good point to remember. Trump’s jailing & even executing Whites to please his handlers & pander to muh Browns. It’s going to be just as bad or worse until at least 2024. Brandish or use a weapon only if the situation demands risking serious jail time (ie if your life or others lives are in immediate danger).. We’re the enemy to the Feds & most local LEO’s – don’t kid yourselves.

But…Trump is a man of genuine greatness, and don’t you forget it!

I’m not sure why Spencer is re-tweeting this.  Who was the “leader of the Alt Right” when this window of opportunity was lost?  Who was doing the Beavis-and-Butthead podcasts during this time?  

Never forget – we need more men like Hubert Humphrey!  He was, like, “valorous” and all that.