Category: mendacity

Gaslighting Anti-Vaxxers

How come I’m not surprised?

The scheduled blog post for today has been postponed in order to bring you the following public service announcement.

It makes sense that the anti-White, pro-HBD, pseudoscience site Counter-Currents promotes anti-vaccination propaganda from scientifically illiterate, paranoid retards.

Once again – vaccines are not dangerous for 99.999% of people, they prevent terrible diseases, and no, “Big Pharma” really doesn’t make their “big money” from those dastardly scary needles. They instead make their real BIG MONEY from all those nice pills and syrups the peanut gallery have no problem with. Want a real scandal? How about telling Americans that they all have to be on statins and blood pressure medication and metformin, instead of telling them to stop being fat bastards?  How about telling students that they have the drug-requiring diagnosis of “attention deficit disorder” instead of being honest with them and telling them they are dumb and lazy and thus unsuited for academics? How about generics from Asia that are, literally, poison?  But, no. Those scary needles are sodomizing our babies, tainting their precious bodily fluids and given them autism, and we can’t have that. Let’s all get measles, whooping cough, tetanus, and diphtheria instead.  Good clean fun!   What about polio?  Bring back the iron lung!  Smallpox!  Rabies!  Enjoy!

Greg Johnson is not only a gaslighting, panhandling turd, he’s now revealed to be an evil gaslighting panhandling turd as well.  For all his faults, he’s educated and, presumably, has a triple digit IQ. He has to know better. But I suppose this is all part of the “big tent” approach of “reaching out to” all sorts of “communities” to “spread the message.”  That he likely thinks it will bring in more supporters and hence more “D’Nations” doesn’t (to his:”mind”) hurt either. Of course, he doesn’t realize that for every “Stan the Man” and for every “if I got bitten by a rabid animal I wouldn’t get the vaccine” Stronza he loses, alienates, and disgusts, educated STEMers. But, hey, it’s Der Movement, and there’s a reason why the Quota Queens require a strict ethnic affirmative action program to keep their positions of “leadership.”


The mindset of some of these nitwits is similar to that of the tragicomic conspiracy theorist “J Richards” at Majority Rights who peddled “moon landing hoax” theories on the premise that “if we can convince people the government lied to them about that we we can convince them the government is lying about race as well.” Just substitute “moon landing” with “vaccines” and you understand the (truly psychopathic) mindset there. The actual truth means nothing.  What these retards fail to understand is that the converse is more true – once people understand that Der Movement lies to them about moon landings and vaccines, they’ll suspect that Der Movement is lying to them about race as well (and to some extent, they’ll be correct).

This is real science.  There’s a reason why educated, rational scientists support vaccination – people who have no vested interests in “making big money” off of vaccination. Vaccination saves lives.  It reduces morbidity and mortality. It is a great invention of Western science – Jenner and Pasteur.

I’m not getting any money promoting vaccination. I’m not a MD or a member of “Big Pharma.” I AM someone who had various childhood diseases now preventable by vaccination and the thought of shitfaced scumbags promoting the spread of disease, among others, because of their self-righteous ignorance or rent-seeking grifting, is sickening. Anyone who gives these retards a platform to, essentially, spread disease and sicken White men, women, and children is a turd of the first order. That means you Greggy. Unfortunately, there’s no vaccination for stupidity or mendacity.

And the Far Right is never going to expand out of its Nutzi Retard ghetto if it continues to be a embarrassing, and-scientific, irrational gaggle of tin foil hat imbeciles. The Right always acts the fool, and the Far Right is the worst.


One sane comment:

OrcishPosted February 4, 2020 at 3:34 pm | PermalinkI wouldn’t listen to all that. Vaccines were considered a major public health breakthrough before “big pharma” existed. if the formulations in use were dangerous competitors would be all over it making safe ones.

And as I’ve written before, unlike all those nice little pills and flavored syrups the fat bastards consume as they roll along the ground, American-used vaccines are manufactured (so far) either here or in Western Europe, not in India or China. Granted, once vaccines are manufactured in India and/or China, then I’ll agree that they then would be manifestly unsafe, just like all your wonderful maintenance medicines are. But not now.


Now, are vaccines 100%, absolutely guaranteed, harmless for every single individual who may take them?  Of course not.  In biology, nothing is. Among the hundreds of millions of vaccine recipients there may be a few whose genetic background, immune systems, etc. are such that they’ll have a bad reaction. There is always some risk in life (autism in children from MMR NOT being one of them) – that’s balanced against Smallpox, Polio, Tetanus, Measles, Rabies, etc.  Is this actually a serious conversation?  Were Jenner and Pasteur “psychopathic” “Jew doctors” working for “Big Pharma?”  Stop the crap already.


As I’ve written before, the fact that objective facts about medicines manufactured in Asia are ignored in favor of tin foil hat conspiracy theories about vaccines demonstrates that anti-vaxx hysteria has it ultimate genesis in the pills vs needles dichotomy, and the psychosexual anxieties weak-minded hysterics have about being “violated” by being “forcibly injected” (“sodomized”*) by the “scary needles.”


There’s also the SJW-like ignoring of science and the smug self-righteousness of anti-vaxxers whose personal identity is wound up in their belief system. Thus, they label everyone who argues in favor of vaccination as “psychopaths” who are part of a “Big Pharma” conspiracy.


Excuse me now as I rub my hands together, cackling insanely, as I await my Big Pharma compensation check for promoting autism among vaccinated children.


Idiots.


*By vaccines bad.  My flirtatious Alt Right meeting attendees or by Mannerbund colleagues good, good, good!

Bottle of Asians

Asians: Shockingly, profoundly alien.

So, I have finished reading the shocking book account of Asiatic pharmaceutical fraud, Bottle of Lies.

The amount of fraud discussed is astounding, the level of Asiatic perfidy astonishing – but not surprising to anti-HBD Asia-skeptics such as myself – and the damage done to global health incalculable. In addition to everything else, there is evidence that substandard Asian drugs contribute to the emergence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.  Asia is a threat to all humanity.

Behold completely, utterly corrupt peoples, with a mentality as alien to the European mind as that of a snake or spider.  There can be no alliance here, no similarity, and no overlap. The gulf is unbridgeable. Some sort of tentacled life form from a planet circling a star in the Andromeda galaxy would be less alien to us than these Asiatics, whose mind-numbing levels of criminal corruption and amoral mental monstrosity are breathtaking.  And lest you think this is hyperbole – read the book.  What are all the HBDers afraid of?  If they are so confident that their Asian Gods are all high-IQ, law-abiding supermen, then the truth should not be feared, right?

Rather than have me just repeat the book’s content with myriad tales of Indian and Chinese incompetence and corruption – just read the book.  If there’s one book that I recommend my readers to read in 2020 it is Bottle of Lies – the perfect, unanswerable riposte to the monstrous lie of HBD.  The Indian cognitive elitists exposed.  The high, high-IQ Holy Orientals from The Land of the Gods exposed.  Read it and weep  – we will weep because of how not only are we in the USA dependent upon Indian and Chinese poisonous fraud but we have all of these “cognitive elitists” invading the American academic world, displacing Whites, and destroying the American (and Western) scientific enterprise with Oriental fraud and Asiatic incompetence.  The HBDers will weep as the facts take a hammer to their fallen Yellow and Brown (*) idols.

*The reality of jugaad is that is a clever euphemism for corruption and fraud.

HBD is a monstrous lie.

The Johnson Conundrum

The resiliency of Greg Johnson: An analysis of a skillful political actor.

Question: How has Greg Johnson not only survived various scandals and other embarrassments but emerged stronger than ever?

After the episode of the Pilleater Chronicles and its fallout and then the revelations about Polignano, folks like Forney were telling us (and this was nearly a year ago) that “Greg Johnson is finished” etc. The whole Forney-Friberg-Spencer anti-Johnson axis (that exists even though they may have squabbles among themselves; e.g., Forney being critical of Spencer) more or less adopted the line that Johnson and Counter-Currents were in terminal decline – “finished”- and  that there was no recovery from the scandals. These types were saying the same thing after Johnson was publicly humiliated by the HopeNotHate Hermansson infiltration, and his having Hermansson give the keynote address at a Counter-Currents meeting.  Then there was the Lewis infiltration.  Any one of these scandals would have been sufficient to delegitimize, perhaps terminally sink, another, less resilient, “movement leader.”  After each of these scandals, Johnson’s leading rivals in the Alt Right loudly predicted his imminent “movement” demise.

They were of course wrong, and Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents continues to go on strongly, raising money, continuing to be “big” in Der Movement – in fact, it is the Forney-Friberg-Spencer faction that seem to be in decline. If there has been any “victor” in the feud, it has been Johnson. Forney continues doing his thing but with very limited influence, Friberg apparently the same, and Spencer is reduced to wrapping himself in the Iranian flag and tweeting about his love life. On the other hand, the destructive Frankenstein monster that is Counter-Currents keeps on lumbering along, and it was Johnson who made international news after being arrested in Norway.  Johnson stands up there with Taylor and MacDonald as among the “Elders” of the (particularly, American) “movement”- I would argue that Greg Johnson’s power and influence within the “movement” has never been greater.

So, how has this happened?  How did Johnson emerge like a phoenix rising out of the ashes from these scandals to reach a pinnacle of influence, despite the scandals, and, perhaps just as importantly, despite the fact that Counter-Currents has displayed a shocking decline in quality, with the most moronic, superficial, hypocritical, pretentious, and juvenile crop of “writers” ever assembled at any one Far Right site?  Counter-Currents should be sliding into Majority Rights-style oblivion and irrelevancy, but, so far, unfortunately, the opposite is happening.

It would be instructive to examine why all of this is so. Such an examination will shed much needed light on Der Movement, and illuminate the underlying rot within that allows someone like Johnson to prosper.  After all consider – Spencer received more criticism, attacks, and disavowals because of the nonsense of Hailgate than did Johnson for the Pilleater and Polignano scandals, which were, at least in my opinion, far worse.

I don’t recall Taylor, Brimelow, and Devlin et al. publicly distancing themselves from Johnson over issues that are far more serious than Spencer acting like an immature jackass.


Some possible reasons for all of that include:

The affirmative action program.  The “movement’s” ethnic affirmative action program is an important factor here. Johnson claims to be of English descent, of founding Old American stock, whose family has been in America since colonial days; he is also phenotypically Nordic.  Now, since Spencer himself is an Anglo-Germanic Nordic, and he has collapsed as an activist, having the proper ancestral (and phenotypic) bonafides is necessary but not sufficient.  One can have the “proper” ancestry and phenotype, but if they crash and burn completely, and are politically inept, nothing will help them. On the other hand, if Johnson was a wop or hunkie – or even possibly a “Nordish” mick – he would have not survived the scandals, regardless of anything else. Ancestry and phenotype are important factors here.

Lesson.  If you don’t have the “right” ancestry, forget about trying to have any influence in Der Movement. If you do have the “right” ancestry, then you really have to be incredibly inept and politically clumsy to fall from grace (e.g., Spencer).

Costs vs. benefits.  Let’s compare Spencer’s Hailgate to Johnson’s scandals with respect to the response (or lack thereof) of other “movement leaders.” I argue that “movement leaders” may well have had practical political reasons for disavowing Spencer while being silent about Johnson, through the weighing of costs vs. benefits.

Hailgate – although in and of itself petty nonsense – became national news because of the Alt Right-Trump connection and because of Spencer’s notoriety at the time, and because of the fact that the 2016 election results were fresh in everyone’s memory. The media leveraged Spencer’s poor judgment to attack other Alt Right leaders as “suit and tie Nazis.” This endangered the status, reputation, and money-making ability of various “leaders” and gave them a very strong motivation to publicly disavow and criticize Spencer. The benefits of disavowing Spencer were clear. What about the costs? These “leaders” probably considered Spencer an immature lightweight and judged that the costs of disavowing Spencer were minimal – Spencer would not, or could not, mount an effective counter-attack against them, and the supporters of these other “leaders” would be unlikely to withdraw support over their Hailgate criticism.

On the other hand, Johnson’s scandals have not been national news and have not directly impacted other major Alt Right figures. These others may have a moral and ethical obligation to criticize Johnson, but what do any of these types care about morals and ethics?  It’s a purely utilitarian consideration for them – there are little practical benefits for disavowing Johnson.  On the other hand, there are real costs. Johnson is a much more dangerous person than is Spencer, and more likely to mount an effective counter-attack. One could imagine Counter-Currents suddenly critiquing Amren over the JQ or once again saying Amren conferences are a waste, or critiquing VDARE’s taking so much “movement” money or once again criticizing Derbyshire, etc.  The same intensity that Counter-Currents focused on the likes of Spencer and Friberg would now be aimed at these other targets.  So, there’s a cost with no practical benefit, and issues of morals and ethics and character mean nothing.  So, these folks give Johnson a “pass” for things worse than what Spencer did.

Lesson. Morals, ethics, and character count for nothing in Der Movement and among “movement leaders.” It is all practical considerations of image, status, and “movement” politics, with a focus on assuring maintenance of supporters and supporter donations.  A well-connected person whose influence is feared by others of like standing can get away with more than someone like Spencer, who is more isolated and is not considered to have the gravitas to be a “heavy player” in the “game.”

The political game.  Johnson, for all his manifest faults, is very, very good at playing the political game – or at least as good as someone who has horrifically bad judgment and who likes feuding can be. Johnson inevitably ends up on bad terms with people in the “movement,” including former allies, but you’ll note that he typically only engages in one major feud at a time.  Former allies may become enemies, and sometimes, typically briefly, vice versa, but these twists and turns occur one at a time. He never engages in any major “two-front war.” Alliances are formed and broken, one feud is engaged in and won, former allies then become foes, new allies are recruited, etc.  Jorjani was used skillfully here – and that was as much the result of Spencer’s political clumsiness and it was Johnson’s skill at using people for just as long as he needs them to undermine his main foes. All these people are used and discarded as fits the agenda, with consummate political skill. As historical analogies, consider Julius Caesar using and discarding Pompey or Augustus doing the same with Marc Antony.  Or how Catherine the Great used and discarded “court favorites” (including lovers) to achieve power. Hitler used and the discarded various people during his rise to power – Eckart, Strasser, Rohm, etc.  One can consider how various organized crime figures rose to prominence through alliances, which they later discarded when it no longer suited them (often killing the former allies).  The Kennedys used Mafia connections to reach the White House, after which Robert Kennedy moved against these former allies. Then there’s the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1939.  You get the picture.

Johnson is also good at “glad-handling” and having friendships with “movement” bigwigs that – for as long as they last before falling apart – provide a cushion of support and prevent those bigwigs from calling out Johnson’s faults. Taylor as an example.  Note that Johnson won’t call out Taylor for “being in bed with the press” (as I note here), while criticizing others. Note that Johnson now supports and attends Amren conferences despite telling us several years ago that attending such meetings was a waste of time and money (money being, of  course, better used for “D’Nations” to Counter-Currents).  Thus, in summary, despite his proclivity to feud, Johnson has still maintained friendly relations with a number of “movement” bigwigs, and that no doubt helps insulate Johnson from the consequences of his manifest failures and various scandals.

Further, whatever what actually happened, the actual “technics” of each accomplishment, the end result was that – if Polignano’s correspondence with Friberg can be believed – Johnson was able to remove Polignano as having any control over Counter-Currents. And John Morgan, originally with Arktos, has ended up with Counter-Currents.  Whether all of this was the result of Machiavellian plotting or just serendipity, one cannot argue with the results. Johnson has weathered all sorts of storms, out-maneuvered rivals, and has a firm control of the Counter-Currents “empire,” such as it is. He therefore is revealed as a reasonably savvy player in the game and art of “movement” politics.  Much better than the likes of Spencer, who, by contrast, is politically clumsy and inept.

Lesson. Being right is not enough to advance your position; being wrong is not enough to retard your progress.  Humans are essentially political animals, and in any grouping that has individuals vying for status and to advance their agendas, political maneuvering will be important.  Johnson is a savvy political operator and thus has not only survived scandals that would have wrecked other prominent activists, but he has prospered while his main rivals (e.g., Spencer) have fallen by the wayside. 


Should activists involved in Der Movement concentrate on such internal politics? The benefits are clear.  What about the costs?  There are costs of time and energy.  There is the mental costs; this can be exhausting, particularly for people who are by nature introverts.  Political maneuvering can always backfire. It also compromises, to some extent, honor and integrity, and, if it is noticed by others, can stain one’s reputation as an honest broker.

A cost-benefit analysis can be done. It depends on context.  An overt and public activist like Johnson has more to gain from politics than someone pseudonymous; however, pseudonymous activists can still benefit. Extroverts have it easier than introverts, but as long as they are not extreme and semi-autistic, introverts can still benefit from politics. The main thing is the affirmative action program.  An activist of Northwest European ancestry – particularly those of British/German/Scandinavian ancestry – can derive great benefit from engaging in “movement” politics since they have great potential for advancement and a rapid rise to leadership. On the other hand, activists of Southern (especially) or Eastern European ancestry  have little or nothing to gain since, regardless of how skilled they may be at the political game, their ancestry bars them from rising to the extent of those from more favored groups. Years of effort can be quickly wiped out by comments about “Moops and Mongols” and other manifestations of “movement” ethnic fetishism. So the relative costs and benefits in this case primarily vary based on their potential benefits, and that varies based on the ancestry of the activist in question. Now, in a truly pan-European movement, this factor would be eliminated, but perhaps there political maneuvering would be somewhat less important than it is in Der Movement.

The cabal and the alliances. Political connections go beyond just one-on-one relationships and include group alliances. There has been talk about a “homosexual cabal” in the “movement” – one that I was warned about as far back as the early 2000s.  There is also the HBD-ethnonationalist-Nordicist alliance. All these groupings, working behind the scenes, can provide crucial support for “movement leaders” who are well-connected.  On the other hand, people like Spencer, more isolated, and whose support is out-in-the –open and very shallow, have no deep support network that can provide a cushion in times of crisis.

Lesson. What goes on behind the curtain is often more important than what goes on in front of it.

The personal revelations. The personal revelations on the Pilleater tape did not have the effects that Forney, Friberg, and company thought, because it was basically an “open secret” in the “movement” for anyone who had a triple digit IQ, and anyone demanding “proof” was basically just engaging in obstructionism or were low-level idiots without any standing in the “movement.” Other aspects of that tape didn’t have much of an impression because things – such as bad behavior at meetings – have been rumored for a long time.  As far as Polignano goes and the revelations in that discussion with Friberg, who in the “movement” really cares about someone with a name like “Polignano” anyway?  Someone named “Johnson” screwing over someone named “Polignano” is a positive in Der Movement, not a negative.

Lesson. What people think is going to have a profound effect upon revelation may not do so, if the revelations are already suspected and/or known, or if the people hearing the revelation actually don’t think what they are hearing is really a bad thing at all.

Ideological flexibility.  Johnson maximizes support with remarkable ideological flexibility – what some would call inconsistency or even hypocrisy.  Johnson is a leading proponent of petty nationalist ethnonationalism – yet Counter-Currents publishes and promotes the work of Francis Parker Yockey and previously hosted some of my own essays promoting pan-Europeanism.  Counter-Currents has both promoted and criticized HBD, has both promoted and criticized Nordicism, has both promoted and criticized racial purity, has both promoted and criticized Amren conferences, has promoted both Traditionalism and Futurism, has White-Knighted as well as run the work of Devlin, Johnson has harshly criticized Derbyshire and then shared the stage with him at Amren – you get the picture.  This maximizes support and lets Johnson have a foot in different “movement” factions.

Lesson. Being two-faced has its advantages.


Practical consistency.  The ideological inconsistency doesn’t bother the Type I retards that constituent the majority of Der Movement, since their own “ideology” is simply a mash-up of Kempian Nordicism, chugging gallons of milk, screaming “Kek!,” etc. Indeed, as stated, the inconsistency is an advantage to maintain appeal among “activists” who are a cut above the dimwit majority and actually do care about ideas, but themselves are still too dim too realize that Counter-Currents has been all over the board on a number of important issues.


More important perhaps is consistency in the practical realm.  Successful activists tend to be ones that consistently are associated with a particular project or group or organization of project.  Taylor with American Renaissance.  Johnson with Counter-Currents.  MacDonald with The Occidental Observer and his various books.  Pierce (and Strom, who has survived controversy of his own) with the National Alliance. On the other hand, the more unsuccessful activists, whose careers are less than the sum of their parts – Spencer and Duke for example – have a history of jumping from one failed project to another.  At some point, I lost track of all of the various groups that Duke formed, led for a few years, and then abandoned. There was the White version of the NAACP (NAAWP), then wasn’t there something called NOFEAR, then EURO, etc?  And that was after his Klan days and his foray into electoral politics.  Spencer has had his varied Alt Right websites sites and the Alt Right corporation, and all sorts of other podcasts and projects, jumping from one to another. All of this failure and inconsistency  does not inspire confidence. On the other hand, stability such as Johnson with Counter-Currents gives him an air of “competence” and is another reason he survives scandal better than Spencer.

Conclusion. This is by no means a comprehensive analysis, but touches upon what I see as some of the main reasons why Johnson has survived and prospered, while Spencer has imploded.  Of course, some of it is just better judgment – Johnson had the good sense not to be involved in Unite the Right.  But, still, comparing the flak that Spencer got for Hailgate compared to Johnson thriving after scandal begs for an explanation – that I have tried to supply.  As further events unfold, more such analysis may be forthcoming.


The underlying lessons here demonstrate the importance of political networking, and various non-merit attributes, in elevating and sustaining individuals in positions of prominence in Der Movement. They provide a blueprint for “activists” with the proper affirmative action-approved ancestral backgrounds to follow to effectively play the political game, and allow others to better understand how they are being “played” by the “leaders” they so blindly support.


Johnson is not going anywhere; he is seemingly here to stay. Although there are some in the “movement” who will never accept him, enough others will so as to ensure that he will be a force within Der Movement for years to come, barring any unforeseen circumstances. And it is difficult to imagine what such circumstances could occur that would dethrone Johnson from his “leadership” position. Given the previous incidents and scandals that have proven unable to do so. As we can see, Amren continues to peddle Johnson’s work. One can expect that Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents will continue to have a significant impact on racial activism and prove the predictions of Forney false.


In any case, we can hope this analysis provokes more discussion and debate and, perhaps, soul-searching among “movement” “activists” with respect to their “leadership.”

Der Movement Marches On, 1/8/20

It’s Der Movement!

Read this. That’s not the first time this has happened to Taylor. It seems every few months he’s writing an article telling us how his “faith in people” and “trust in people” was violated by some journalist who “lied.” In fact, this seems to occur over and over and over again, and yet he doesn’t learn to avoid the media, it doesn’t occur to him he has the option of refusing to deal with them.  When I criticize the judgment of “movement leaders,” remember this.

And notice that Johnson has nothing to say about those incidents, while criticizing others for being “in bed with the press.” Johnson is very good at playing the “movement” political game, which will be discussed as part of a forthcoming piece.

Laugh at this – about a paper I discussed here long ago. Emphasis added.

Not surprisingly, there has been gene flow over the centuries back and forth between East Asia and Europe. For example, a couple of my friends in high school who were of European descent, one Hungarian, one Russian, had slightly East Asian looking eyes.

By golly, with evidence like that, why does Sailer even need to look at population genetics papers?

A 2015 paper in Scientific Reports (thanks to iSteve commenter Anti-HBD)…

Anti-HBD?  A commentator with the King of HBD?

…looked at current (not ancient populations) and tried to estimate admixture by treating the French as representative Europeans and the Dai of Southern China (and also of Laos and Thailand) as representative East Asians.

EXACTLY what I have criticized such papers and especially the testing companies about. The results of “admixture estimates” are going to depend fully on what populations are chosen as the references.  Gee…French are treated as “representative Europeans.”  Let’s guess that other Frenchmen sampled will turn out to have very low levels of “admixture” – at which point Der Movement will foam at the mouth about “French racial purity.”

Quantitating and Dating Recent Gene Flow between European and East Asian Populations
Published: 02 April 2015
Pengfei Qin, Ying Zhou, Haiyi Lou, Dongsheng Lu, Xiong Yang, Yuchen Wang, Li Jin, Yeun-Jun Chung & Shuhua Xu
…we detected gene flow between Europeans and Asians were prevalent for most populations including even those from west-northern Europe and East Asia which have been generally regarded as less admixed. . .

It’s of great benefit to all humanity, no doubt..

. . . CEU populations mostly originating from France and Germany had a small fraction (0.7 ± 0.8%) of genetic material from EAS. 

Shocking!  I mean, if you use French as the population representing “European,” who would have ever guessed that other French samples tested would have low admixture?  If you essentially compare people to themselves (other co-ethnics), would you expect otherwise, you morons?

People from Great Britain such as British (GBR) and Orcadian inherited 2.5%–3.8% from ancestral EAS. Finnish (FIN) and Russians inherited significantly more genetic material (>12%) from ancestral EAS, which is consistent with their historical record of admixture with Mongolian populations. 

Durocher I’m sure will tell us that the British, Orcadian, and Finnish results are of great benefit to all humanity.

Admixture proportions for some CSA are relatively small, for which Kalash has 20.7% EUR ancestry…

Der Movement: “But, but, but, they look White…”

In addition, Russian and Finnish populations show ~13% Asian ancestry.

The Finnish data are, of course, of great benefit to all humanity.

Keep in mind, however, that 2015 was a long time ago in population genetics . . 

Which is why these guys keep on dredging up Cavalli-Sforza data from the early 1990s.

Laugh at this, emphasis added.

I take solace in the fact that the pain we are feeling at every new blustering Tweet — the embarrassment, the cringe that reaches to our very core, continuing on into the subatomic level…

Not that long ago Johnson was telling us that Trump is a man of “genuine greatness.”

So what should White Nationalists do about this horrible blunder?

Make bigger blunders themselves?

First, we take stock: there are some things we can do…

Fail.

and some things that we can’t.

Succeed.

We have a shrinking number of beleaguered outposts on the internet from which we can speak the truths that the establishment denies. And despite all the attempts to deplatform us, our audience and our credibility are growing. This is where we need to concentrate our efforts. No matter what Trump’s blunder leads to, we can turn it to our advantage by using it as an opportunity to speak forbidden truths.

Truths like that Der Movement is a money-making enterprise full of Quota Queen grifters.

The bloody-minded stupidity of the Republican grifters

Pot meet kettle.

We lack the numbers, money, or legitimacy to constitute a voting bloc, so pretending that we are going to punish Trump by throwing the election to the Democrats just makes us sound like hysterical fantasists, which undermines the credibility that is one of our biggest assets.

Sure!  Being always wrong, about just about everything, builds credibility. Lying and gaslighting on a continuous basis builds credibility.  Talking about a “race war” “kicking off in the summer of 2021” doesn’t make you seem like a hysterical fantasist, no sir!

Right now, the United States is in the intolerable position of being merely a plaything of Jewish interests. 

Sounds just like HBD.

A comment for Derbyshire:  

Dave
White/Asian hybrids are crazy and stupid, like they have a race-riot going on inside their heads. Burn the rice, pay the price:
Michael Fay — “You mean spray-painting cars and stealing road signs is a serious crime in Singapore?”
Elliot Rodger — “I have a BMW! Why are beautiful women I won’t even say hi to not jumping on my dick?”
Daniel Holtzclaw — “Wow, ever since I became a cop, black hookers are really eager to suck my willy. What could possibly go wrong?”
Matthew de Grood — “Must…kill…vampires…”
Miriam Weeks — “I love choking on pornstar cock, it’s so empowering!”

Is there any actual evidence that Fred West had any non-English, or at least non-British, ancestry?  Other than “looking distinctly like a Gypsy?” I realize to Der Movement, subjective opinions about physical appearance equate to actual objective genealogical/genetic ancestry, but for the rest of us, where’s the evidence that West was a “minority?”  What about his wife, by the way?  Maybe West was an alien, but if so, I cannot find any evidence online to support that claim – and the TOO article certainly did not supply such evidence.  That’s yet another example of Der Movement’s gaslighting on race and ethnicity.

Long after Salter and I critique Kaufmann, the likes of Zman wake up.

Under the Hood

Gregory Hood, that is.  And other news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

However, there are no grifters among white advocates — at least no successful ones. No one I know is doing it “for the money.” There is little money. 

What a disgusting liar Hood is.

…four groups at the forefront of the white nationalist movement to register as charities and raise more than $7.8 million in tax-deductible donations… 

The Connecticut-based VDare Foundation is led by Peter Brimelow, founder and editor of an anti-immigration website. Brimelow, who spoke at the National Policy Institute’s conference last month, founded his nonprofit in 1999 and raised nearly $4.8 million between 2007 and 2015. 

Brimelow received $378,418 in compensation from his nonprofit in 2007accounting for nearly three-quarters of its total expenses that year. Brimelow says his salary that year was $170,000 and the rest reimbursed him for travel, office supplies and other expenses.

From 2010 through 2015, VDare Foundation didn’t report any compensation directly paid to Brimelow. But, starting in 2010, the nonprofit began making annual payments of up to $368,500 to Brimelow’s Happy Penguins LLC for “leased employees.” Brimelow disclosed his ownership of that company on tax returns.

Little money!  Right?  Little money!  Liar.  What’s “little” in “little money?”  Millions of dollars is “little?”  Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year is “little?”

(There’s not even a PayPal). 

No, but donations are tax-deductible – special IRS status. The System that all of these “revolutionaries” are so very bravely and very boldly “resisting” has granted to them special tax privileges.  Fight the power, eh?

We’re doing it because we must.

We must rattle the tin cup.

No other movement creates the return on investment we do. 

If by that you mean no other movement takes large amounts of money and achieves absolutely nothing, then I agree wholeheartedly.

The most powerful media platforms on Earth demonize and suppress us…

While the US government grants you tax-exempt/tax-deductible donation status.

…yet we keep growing. If we ever get a level playing field, we’ll win. I think our opponents know this, which is why they’re so paranoid.

So paranoid they grant you special tax privileges.

Hood used to be a writer I read regularly and, more importantly, one of the few writers/activists in the “movement” that I respected.  Now, I cannot get through his Amren scribblings without absolute contempt for him bubbling up.  He’s been tainted by the Alt Wrong, by Der Movement Inc., and is just another gaslighting liar.

However, I want to make clear that I am NOT saying that you should never financially support Far Right causes.  However, three points:

1. You should take care of yourself first, and that “taking care” should include savings, investments, and retirement planning.  Don’t be suckered in by rent-seeking grifters and their “everything is going to collapse in 5-10 yeas, so why save – give to us now.” They’ve been spewing that self-serving nonsense for more than half-a-century.  Only after you’ve taken care of yourself, in every way, should you even just consider the possibility of giving “D’Nations.”

2. You should give to those who deserve it.  You should not give to freaks, fetishists, people who have racial contempt for you (for the “White ethnics” out there), Quota Queen incompetents, Type I Nutzis, gaslighting liars, tragicomic inept buffoons with an unending record of unremitting failure, morons with poor judgment, perverts, obvious grifters, etc.  I realize that eliminates basically the entirely of Der Movement Inc. (a money-making enterprise), but that’s their fault, not mine.

3. Folks whose operations are pulling in six figure annual inputs – and in some cases in the mid-six figures – should not be crying poverty.  Certainly, if they were deserving of support, they could ask for more, they could rightfully claim that the Left has much greater resources, they could claim that they – if they were competent – can get more done with more money. But they shouldn’t pretend that they’re “poor freedom fighters” eating cat food and wearing rags when they are financially better off than many of their contributors and in some cases live in comfortable blue state coastal enclaves. I don’t  know, for example this photo does not in my opinion reflect struggling, piss-poor dissident freedom fighters.

Tolkien: The ideological hero of the Type I “Twigs and branches” nitwits.  Yes, indeed, let’s stay “snug in our hobbit hole in the forest” enjoying all that “de facto anarchy” while the Chinese rule the world and conquer space (using White-invented technology). On wonders. Is the promotion of anti-technological Tolkien “traditionalism” for Whites part of the HBD agenda?  Let’s convince Whites to unilaterally surrender to their Asian overlords, eh?  Don’t worry, the Silkers will jump in and tell us that black-booted Chinese girls with guns can guard our borders, so no problem!

Recently, I discussed an Amren article describing Italy’s abysmally low native birthrate, and the fact that 9% of the population is already composed of foreigners – and compared that to the assertions of the great and good Sir Desmond Jones that Italy is 100% ethnoracially homogeneous and will remain so until the end of time, forever and ever, amen.  Of course, the great and good Sir Desmond Jones said the same thing about Russia and Eastern Europe in general. As we know that Der Movement is always wrong, about EVERYTHINGwe thus read (emphasis added):

But it is Eastern Europe where the population crisis is most advanced.
At the end of the Cold War, Bulgaria had 9 million people. By 2017, that had fallen to 7.1 million. In 2050, Bulgaria’s population is estimated at 5.4 million — a loss of 40% to death and migration since Bulgaria won its freedom from the Soviet Empire.
By 2050, Ukraine and Poland are each projected to lose another 6 million people, and Hungary will lose 1.5 million.
Lithuania and Latvia have seen serious population losses since the end of the Cold War and are in the front rank of European nations losing people at the fastest rate.
U.N. demographers project Russia’s population may fall from 145 million today to 121 million by 2050. Such losses rival those that Russia suffered under Lenin, Stalin and World War II.
The Far East is home to some 6 million Russians who dwell on that vast tract that is so full of natural resources like timber, oil and gas.
“The population continues to decrease almost everywhere in the Far East,” lamented President Vladimir Putin at an investment conference in Vladivostok: “The inflow is increasing, but it does not cover the number of people leaving the region.”
In the Far East, Siberia and the Lake Baikal region, investors and workers from China are appearing in growing numbers.

Wrong, wrong, they’re ALWAYS wrong.

Let’s see – the far-left Neocon Antifa Don Trump can’t protect America’s borders, but he can start Zionist-inspired military conflicts with Iran.  He’s a sincere man of genuine greatness, right Johnson?

Wrong, wrong, they’re ALWAYS wrong.

Once Again Countering the Rancid Current

Counter-Currents: The worst “pro-White site” on the Internet.

Greg Johnson: Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness.

The reality (emphasis):

Mr. Cullen indicted RAM members with an anti-riot statute originally passed to stop Vietnam War protesters. The Washington Post wrote a glowing profile on Mr. Cullen, in which he explained: “Hate crimes and violence by white supremacist organizations that qualify as domestic terrorism are way up. Prosecuting them is common sense.”

There is no white-supremacist violence “surge.” Mr. Cullen simply wanted to destroy this group. He credited far-left journalists with providing a “starting-point” for his investigation, and the FBI relied on a hit piece from antifa for its criminal complaint. Four RAM members pleaded guilty to “conspiracy to riot” charges. Mr. Cullen ignored — consciously or not — the obvious truth that if there had been no antifa protesters, there would have been no violence. If the “conspiracy to riot” law were enforced fairly, he would have prosecuted antifa as well. He didn’t, apparently because he takes orders from liberal journalists…Any crackdown will be subjective. That’s why Mr. Cullen’s nomination is wrong. He selectively enforces the law based on political and media considerations. For the RAM case, he took his cue from left-wing journalists. He ignores groups that proclaim revolutionary intent but indicts groups that defend themselves. He practices “anarcho-tyranny.”

The House just impeached President Trump. I’m having a hard time caring. President Trump probably doesn’t even know Mr. Cullen’s name, but he should. If these are the judges he gives us, it’s hard to see why we should support him.

The Quota Queens: Wrong, wrong, they’re ALWAYS wrong.

Sallis – who labeled Trump a fraud and nicknamed him “Antifa Don Trump” – proven right again.

Sallis: Right, right, he’s ALWAYS right.

More from Counter-Currents:

Bernie

Posted December 18, 2019 at 9:35 am | Permalink

“Under would-be Yockey biographer Keith Stimley’s editorship, Thompson contributed book reviews to the Journal of Historical Review.”

I see that Keith Stimley died very young (35). Does anyone know the circumstances of his death?

Reply

K R Bolton

Posted December 18, 2019 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

AIDS

Keith Stimely: proto-Alt Righter?

Contrary to what you may think, these clips are not – repeat, not! – documentary footage of a certain young bisexual male Alt Righter attending certain highbrow racialist meetings.

If you watched episode one of A Very English Scandal (about a real life political scandal) you’ll see that the homosexual politician was a radical pro-colored immigration lunatic, mocking and opposing the idea of a White Britain, and shamelessly shilling for more “Commonwealth immigration” – open borders for “the Commonwealth” (sort of like the pro-Brexit leaders of today). That’s yet more evidence that “being in the EU” has, and had, fundamentally nothing to do with the racial morass found in the UK today. The British people did it to themselves. Ethnonationalism!


In reality, even if there was never an EU, the UK would still be as non-White as it is today. Actually, likely even more so, since in the absence of the EU, and the UK’s presence in the EU, all those immigration slots that went to Eastern Europeans would have gone to “Commonwealth” Negroes and South Asians instead.  And I say that as someone who has a long history of being anti-EU. But as much as I dislike the EU, I dislike ethnonationalist lies even more.

Hampton writing in Counter-Currents:

Baseball is too slow-paced and indulges conservative fantasies. The world never changes in baseball, and conservatives can pretend it’s still 1950 every summer

Putting aside the comments about “slow-paced” (interestingly exactly mirroring Johnson’s previous critiques of the sport*), as regards:

The world never changes in baseball, and conservatives can pretend it’s still 1950 every summer.

Sure!  What with inter-league play, the designated hitter, bottom-of-the-lineup hitters blasting 30+ home runs per year with the juiced-up balls travelling well over 400 feet even with clumsy one-handed swings, the endless parade of relief pitchers, every other pitcher having had “Tommy John surgery,” most televised games being on pay-for-TV cable, etc. – it’s just like 1950!  

Wrong, wrong, they’re ALWAYS wrong.

And, hey, I thought Counter-Currents liked “tradition?” I suspect the disdain for baseball is due to ADHD types (likely enriched among Type I activists) whose preference in sports is for constant, repetitive, back-and-forth action, devoid of deeper strategy and forethought (sort of like how they conduct their “activism).  I suppose it is also possible some types get a thrill over all those “macho hard men” in hockey (too bad hockey players don’t skate around in “rainbow thongs,” eh?).  Anyway…sports are all “bread and circuses” anyway.  But the Alt Right sure seems obsessed with it.

* I recall that, recently, another Hampton article – a movie review no less (was”Trevor Lynch” not available?) – was originally credited to Johnson.  This Hampton requires close scrutiny.

Another issue: Read this.  When Russia announces advances in their nuclear deterrent, the fraud Trump tweets, lying, that “we have better and more advanced weapons.”  Nonsense. The Minuteman ICBM is a weapon system from the 60s and 70s, the Trident SBLM is a weapon system from the 70s and 90s, and as far as the bomber force goes, the US continues to downgrade the yield of the free fall bombs to embarrassingly low levels. Russia is far, far ahead. The “Ground Based Strategic Deterrent” should have been produced decades ago.

And have you noticed that in the past, American rockets and missiles (actualized or cancelled) were always given names reflecting imagination and individualism, names that also reflected cultural “Whiteness” – Greco-Roman and Norse mythology, American history, Western literature, animals, stars, etc. (even naming one after an Indian tribe is a very ‘White” thing to do – look at sports teams)?  Nowadays, we get sterile names like “Ground Based Strategic Deterrent.”  I suppose the rot started when the MX missile was given the stupid name of Peacekeeper (on the other hand, I rather liked the name Midgetman, which reflected tongue-in-cheek imagination). This seems like a small and unimportant change, but it informs us about deep differences in American culture and attitudes between then and now.  Today’s deracinated, empty, consumerist, vapid, sterile culture cannot even come up with imaginative and Western/American/White code names for the products of Western technics. I suppose though I shouldn’t complain too much about it – we may start getting “diverse” names for rockets and missiles – Zulu, Carjacker, Rapper, Cholo, Confucius, King David…the mind boggles.

Gaslighting Greg and Other News, 12/19/19

Odds and ends.

MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!  Hey!  Trump needs to survive the Senate trial – after all, Kanye West, Kim Kardashian, and Benjamin Netanyahu no doubt have more policy objectives they need fulfilled.

Ronnie Raygun himself was standing up to the Soviet Union, not “Russia,” and Jewish liberal congressmen were fighting Reagan every step of the way on that.

See this. Do you need any more demonstration of why conservatives always lose?  Look, I despise Trump, but consider – when have American liberal Democrats EVER organized an effort – never mind an actual PAC – to oust a sitting Democrat President, even at the cost of also having Republicans take Congress as well as the Presidency?  Never. The Left may fight among themselves, but when it comes to a showdown with the Right – even rightist frauds like Trump – they come together and make common cause. Leave it to the cuckservative Right to make common cause with the Left against a Republican President.

Sallis right once again.  I told you that the real problem with drugs was NOT “Big Pharma injecting vaccines into people” but instead the endlessly prescribed maintenance medicine Americas are being drugged with.  But, alas, the vaccines – that actually are necessary and do good – come from those scary needles, while the drug pushers have the nice appeal of simple-to-swallow pills to entice the zombies with.  Any comments, Strom?

That’s all we need, more Spencer in the news.

Once again, the Type Is shill for winter and cold weather.  You know, like Duke living in Louisiana and Zman living in Baltimore.  Jeelvy can always leave the Balkans and immigrate to Alaska.  All these guys do is constantly rehash The Fate of Northernkind ADV broadcast.  I don’t know – Neolithic Jeelvy may not have all of his winterish bonafides in order.  Not a true northerner, Jeelvy, you swarthoid.

H. Keith Thompson did have one characteristic that would have allowed him to fit in well with Counter-Currents, and it was NOT his pan-Europeanism.

Gaslighting Greg (emphasis added):

When Brexit won and I heard “Land of Hope and Glory” played at one of the celebrations, I found myself tearing up, much to my surprise. Of course, it makes sense. England is my ancestral homeland. 

And that’s why Johnson has a sinecure as a Quota Queen leader, due to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy.  Of course, if Johnson were to move to Europe, he’d likely go to Hungary, not England.  

Let’s see: Johnson, Spencer, Duke, Pierce, Taylor, Brimelow, Derbyshire – the variation in ethnic ancestry there is matched only by the variation in their level of success (or lack thereof).

But actually feeling it came as a surprise. It was one of those “Welcome to the human race” experiences.

You’re not there yet, Greg.

I was similarly delighted with the outcome of the latest UK general elections, which was good for the National Populism and ethnonationalism not just in Great Britain but around the world.

Ethnonationalism!  Less Poles and more Blacks and Brownsters!  Forward Rotherham, forward!

White nations want National Populism: sensible social conservativism + a state that is willing to intervene in the economy to protect the working and middle classes from plutocracy and globalization. The cosmopolitan elites that rule us want just the opposite: social liberalism + globalization and oligarchy.

If White nations want National Populism – true National Populism – all they need to do is vote for it.  That they have not yet done so (Boris Johnson is no true National Populist) shows that Johnson is full of it.

Thus our ruling elites have made an art of not giving the voters what they want. In 2016, the UK voted for Brexit, and the political establishment has done everything in its power not to deliver it. In 2016, the American people voted for National Populism and elected Donald Trump, but the political establishment simply dug in its heels against Trump’s National Populist agenda, although they did allow him to deliver tax cuts to billionaires, pardons to Jewish criminals, and basically anything Benjamin Netanyahu asked for.

Hey!  I thought that Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness!  Which is it, Greg?  And how did those “ruling elites” become rulers in the first place?

As an ethnonationalist, I support the right of all European peoples to their own sovereign homelands.

Except Hungarians.

Different peoples, even closely related ones, really are different.

John Morgan is different from native Hungarians. When is he leaving that nation and allowing Hungarians to have homogeneity and sovereignty?

Thus they are more likely to come into conflict if they have to live in the same system. If England and Wales want to leave the EU and Scotland and Northern Ireland don’t, then the only way for all parties to get their way is to break up the UK.

Then we can separate West and East England, and then North and South England.

A common objection to secession movements in our circles is that Brexit or Scottish independence won’t really change immigration. But if immigration will happen with or without Brexit, then it is not really a relevant issue in the first place.

Johnson is such a despicably dishonest gaslighter than it is truly breathtaking. Johnson leaves out that all of the leading UK Brexit leaders support “Commonwealth” immigration of Blacks and Browns, and that the only immigration they don’t like is intra-European.  Boris Johnson – very English he! – is all for more immigration.  Immigration may occur with or without Brexit, but the choice will between Poles and non-Whites. True enough, Poles don’t belong in the UK either, but if we accept Johnson’s blithe shrugging off of immigration occurring no matter what, then the less damaging immigration streams should be accepted.

Brexit will, however, allow the British to set their own immigration policies rather than Brussels.

Indeed.  Fewer Polish plumbers and more Pakistani child sex groomers.

Scottish independence will allow the Scots to set their own policies rather than London. Under such circumstances, the policies they choose may not suit you, but they are more likely to suit the UK or Scotland.

Or Nigeria and Pakistan.

White freedom and self-determination will happen one white nation at a time. Thus White Nationalists should applaud Brexit and Scottish independence because they uphold the ethnonationalist principle and demonstrate that national sovereignty can be attained without violence. We want as many such precedents as possible.

Yes, and then maybe Hungary can deport Morgan.

The British people have spoken, yet again. But Boris Johnson’s battle has just begun. Now he has to keep his promises in the teeth of the globalist establishment that opposes him. Nationalists of all nations wish him well.

Particularly African and South Asian nationalists who want their co-ethnics to colonize the UK.

Politics, as they say, is the art of the possible. There is no better proof that something is possible than an example of it being actual. When Brexit passed, suddenly it became conceivable in the minds of millions that Trump could be elected. And surely that change of sentiment actually helped him get elected.

I thought that the “Alt-Right memed Trump into the Presidency?”

Boris Johnson’s victory now makes Donald Trump’s re-election seem possible, and that makes it more likely. 

And yet another reason to utterly despise Johnson and his fundamental dishonesty.  It was only a few months ago that he was stating “Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what” (no matter what!) and “He will lose in a landslide.” You know, the usual Type I Quota Queen absolute certitude and arrogance that I criticized him for here back then.  Now, of course, he pretends he never wrote that, and so “..makes Donald Trump’s re-election seem possible.”  And “more likely.”  More likely, no matter what, I’m sure. Why oh why do all you nitwits out there still support Counter-Currents and send them money?

I have linked to this before, but it is worth listening to again.