Category: mendacity

The HBD Agenda

John Reed, Fred Derbyshire….it’s all one.

Question: How is Fred Reed any different than Derbyshire?  They are almost EXACTLY the same, defending multiracialism and miscegenation because of their own personal failings in that regard. Further, they are also exactly alike in making Blacks the main race problem – “look here, it’s dem dere Negroes that are no good, but my favorite non-White group is A-OK.” Even more – both praise the phenotypes of the racially mixed people their own families represent, and heap scorn on anyone who thinks otherwise.  The ONLY difference is that Derbyshire worships East Asians while Reed worships mixed-race “Latinos” (there are of course “Latin Americans” who are of European stock – Bolsonaro of Brazil being one example – but Reed is not really talking about them, is he?). 

The fact that Reed critiques Derbyshire only makes all of this more hilarious.  His attacks against Coulter are just icing on the cake, since she’s a known mudshark herself.  

This is the utter and complete disgrace Der Movement falls into when you have an affirmative action policy; after all, Derbyshire, Reed, and Coulter do have something else in common besides a predilection for inter-racial sex (and, possibly, male-level testosterone levels) – and that “something” is not Eyetalian or Romanian ancestry.

And anyone who criticizes Reed for his self-interested defense of multiracialism and miscegenation without also doing the same for Derbyshire is a rank hypocrite.

But there is a deeper issue here.  Note how most of these discussions – even those from the anti-Reed/Derbyshire side – solely focus on proximate issues.  So, the debate is about physical appearance, the perception of “robustness” and “sturdiness,” the problems or lack thereof of biracial children, “social consequences,” personal preferences and marital bliss (or “measured groveling”), criminality, IQ, etc. – but no real discussion of ultimate interests, of Salterian values, of EGI, of racial preservation, of genetic continuity. Thus, the debate is framed wholly within the HBD framework, it is wholly conducted via the values of HBD, and the value of racial preservation for its own sake is ignored.  IQ is considered, while EGI is not.  This demonstrates the power, the total victory, of HBD within Der Movement, Inc.

How was this victory achieved?  Consider the following. Why do you suppose the HBDers focus so much on intra-European differences?  Why does HBD focus so intensely on the alleged deficiencies of Southern and Eastern Europeans, with a particular concentration on Italians, especially Southern Italians? Why is the only exception to that South/East emphasis harsh critiques against the Irish?  Did you ever consider that the Irish and the (Southern) Italians constitute the main part of the “White ethnic” population of the USA (with Eastern Europeans like Poles making up most of the remainder)?  Did you ever consider how all of this is well designed to impede White solidarity in America – a clear HBD objective?

Further, why the constant harping about “Inner Hajnal” vs. “Outer Hajnal” (almost always in reference to Europe – the idea that Jews and Asians are “Outer” rarely if ever comes up), with the constant reminders that the Irish and the Southern Italians (and Eastern Europeans) are “Outer?”  And why the constant sniping against Frank Salter and EGI?

The HBDers want to replace racialism with cognitive elitism on the Far Right.  They hate and fear White solidarity, they hate and fear pan-Europeanism, they hate and fear the organic solidarity of Europe and of the West, and, most of all, they hate and fear anything that threatens the status of “Rosie and the kids,” Professor Hart, “Razib” and “Godless Capitalist,” and all the rest.  At best, they want White nationalism to be replaced by Jew- and Asian-accepting IQ cognitive elitism; at minimum, they want to ruin White nationalism to make America safe for Jews, Asians, race-mixers, and triracial Jamaican bloggers. They want EGI ignored, they want the genetic distance between Europeans and Asians ignored, they want genetic kinship and genetic continuity to be ignored, and they want only proximate metrics of benefit to Jews and Asians to be considered – with the exception that they’ll also promote any proximate metric that turns Europeans against each other.

The HBDers are not stupid; they have studied Der Movement and they know what buttons to push to further their objectives. They observe the ethnic divides and know how to exacerbate them.  They know how to appeal to Nordicists and other fetishists by bashing those groups the Nordicists despise, and they know how to appeal to the racial vanity of those factions of Der Movement by comparing noble and intelligent “Inner Hajnal” Europeans with the stupid and degenerate despised “Outer Hajnal mongrels.” They’ve been doing this for years, and while these tactics are laughably transparent, they know who and what they’re dealing with, and they know that “movement” reflexes will always win out over rational thought.

Consider “Sallis’ Law.”  How could the HBD strategy be anything other than successful?  So the terms of debate are those of HBD; Yellow Supremacists go from strength to strength while White nationalism goes from weakness to weakness.  And Der Movement’s fetishes, obsessions, and affirmative action program makes all of this possible.

Yes, there are differences and disagreements between European peoples.  But, you know, those are issues for WE to sort out, among ourselves; we should not want or need others, who have malicious intent, to do their concern trolling to set us against each other in bitter squabbles that we cannot win – and that they cannot lose.

Call this “crazy and bitter” and “the paranoid style” all you want, but serious reflection of HBD activity in light of what is written here should illuminate the truth. The bottom line is that HBD is a political movement – politics is activity in relation to power (as Yockey told us) – and the power here is power for Jews, Asians, and White race-mixers.  

Advertisements

Evidence Derbyshire Supports Race-Mixing

Answering lying scum.

A piece of utter filth commenting at Counter-Currents writes:

threestarsPosted May 31, 2019 at 10:43 am | PermalinkYou’re perfectly exemplifying the malaise Quinn is talking about. You’re maliciously strawmening Derbyshire, who NEVER advocated for race mixing with Asians and specifically said so himself on numerous occasions. If we were to shun every member of our movement or ally who was married or had sex with Jewish, Asian, or Indian women we’d be back to the dark days of barely articulate methheads raving about Hitler.

Let’s put aside the interesting statement (perhaps true for the Alt Right) that there would not be many activists left – apart from stupid drug addicts – if we shun race-mixers.  Also, we can put aside the implication that opponents of miscegenation are “barely articulate methheads” (I suppose they are slightly nuts latrine flies as well). Let’s focus on the claim that Derbyshire never advocated for Eurasian mongrelizaiton.

Really?  Derbyshire NEVER advocated for race mixing with Asians?  Of course, there’s different interpretations for “advocated.” Given the sensitivities involved and the gross damage done to racial interests by miscegenation, I consider a defense of, and supportive tolerance of, race mixing, coupled with praising the results of such mixing, to be reasonably equivalent to “advocating” – particularly when the person in question is a race-mixer themselves and represents the miscegenation ideal in the bedroom and the crib.

Let’s consider Derbyshire’s infamous “awkward squad” VDARE post, the one in which he essentially admits that he married a Chinatrix because he is a socially awkward loser with an unpleasant personality.  While it is true that he suggests that mass miscegenation may have “unforeseen consequences” and that opposition to such mass mixing could be legitimate, we note he never defines what level of admixture is too much, and then he proceeds to strongly defend European-Asian admixture, even to the extent of mass admixture that produces an evenly hybridized population. The relevant passages are as follows, emphasis added:

It can, I think, seriously be doubted whether, if there had never been large numbers of blacks in the U.S.A., anti-miscegenation laws would ever have been thought of at all.

As to Jared’s dire warnings about the dangers to mental and physical health faced by the offspring of mixed-race marriages—Pshaw! There are hazards of every kind in human reproduction.

I just last week read in a newspaper article that: “Twin and triplet babies have a five time greater risk of dying within their first year compared to single babies.” We all know that older mothers have higher risk of birth defects. Suicide rates are sensationally higher in some nations than in others, for reasons partly genetic. (The only three nations of Finno-Ugrian linguistic stock are all in the top 20 on that list.)

Should we not then have twins? Should we make our women breed early? Should we shun marriage with Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians?

I suppose some people would say so. Most of us, however, have in these matters what investment advisers call “a high appetite for risk,” and take whatever Nature feels like offering us with the partner we have chosen.

In the particular case of European-Asian matches, Jared and I both recently attended a lecture that included a genetic analysis of the Uighurs, a Central Asian people. They are very precisely half European, half Asian.

I have, as it happens, met more than the average number of Uighurs. They seem to me a fine sturdy people not notably lacking in intelligence or afflicted with any very noticeable personality defects. They are certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.

I say again: Pshaw!

So, first, he stupidly equates race mixing with having twins or triplets or mating with “Finns, Hungarians, and Estonians.”  Then – and here is the crucial part – he utterly rejects Taylor’s anti-mixing attitude (Pshaw!), and cites the Uighurs as an example of a wonderfully sturdy and robust product of very nice half-and-half European-Asian mongrelization.

He then even more stupidly defends miscegenation because the Uighurs are “certainly robust enough to be giving the Chinese Communists a lot of trouble.”  Last I looked the Han Chinese were in absolute zero significant danger from any Uighurs, who they are repressing quite nicely, and any non-significant danger from Uighurs likely has more to do with their religion than with their racial makeup.  And even if Uighurs were real troublemakers – what? – is that a defense of race-mixing?  Gee, racially mixed Blacks and Hispanics in America are causing White Americans all sorts of trouble, so let’s support European-Sub-Saharan African- Amerindian admixture.  I mean, they are all real sturdy and robust, so what’s the problem?

Take home message: Derbyshire is a supporter and a de facto advocator for European-Asian miscegenation, and filthy scum who claim otherwise are LYING to you.

I say again: Pshaw!

Answering Durocher

A response.

The dishonest Durocher writes

I received some interesting comments as well as some pushback for my previous article summarizing a scientific study showing correlations between brain shape/size and regional European ancestry. This is understandable given the sensitivity of the topic. Individual and ethnic amour-propre is a powerful motivator in the face of emotionally hurtful facts and hypotheses. However, as I like to say, the science is coming, ready or not, whether people like it or not, whether these fit with the current ideological fashions or not. I am confident that the progress of science and free discussion on the Internet will lead to an increase in human consciousness and apprehension of the truth.

Yes, indeed, the science is coming, ready or not, and I’m sure that the sweatily obsessed “movement” of which you are a part would be interested in knowing the truth.  Or perhaps not. Genetic archaeology is not going to be kind to Der Movement and its theories, I believe.


Two points. First, the above comment of Durocher comes from a post (at the anti-White Jew Unz blog of course) primarily discussing a paper analyzing cortical geometry among the major racial groups – a more generalized look at the subject of Durocher’s previous foray into the subject. Of course, this more generalized paper was also discussed at my original blog post from which Durocher was alerted to the intra-European study.  But, also of course, after my criticisms of him over the last few days, Le Grand Frog this time omits reference to my original post. Injured individual amour-propre perhaps?


Second, Durocher is being typically dishonest in his characterization of his critics. I’ve read the comments at the Unz blog, and I am or course aware of what I have written here.  None of these people are attacking the actual science. No one – unless I missed a comment among the 100+ there – critiqued the actual original paper and its findings. The conclusions about intra-European brain differences were not substantially challenged. No one, you pathetic weasel, is avoiding truth or dismissing objective scientific facts. Instead people are criticizing Durocher’s over-interpretation, hand-waving “spin” to dismiss contrary facts (avoiding truth?), and his overall hyper-Nordicist “take”on the science. That Durocher already has a well-established reputation for being a Nordicist – and also dishonestly denies it in Kempian fashion – adds to the perception of an underlying racio-political agenda, rather than a dispassionate discussion of data. People are not objecting to facts, but to Durocher’s tendentious reading of those facts.


By the way, Durocher you won’t find any avoidance of racial and ethnic facts at EGI Notes because as you wrote:

I want to thank Ted Sallis for bringing attention to a fascinating study…

This blog has always been about getting to the facts about race and ethnicity, regardless of what it says about one group or another.  Your post – complete with groundless speculation and a juvenile picture of an anti-WN Austrian playing a fictional barbarian in a Hollywood move – is not “science” or “truth.” If your snide comments are directed at me, then you expose yourself as a fool, having learned about the study in question from my own work.

If the snide comments were instead about those criticizing you at the Jew Unz blog, then the fact that others criticize aspects of your post is not necessarily an indication of “individual and ethnic amour-propre” but instead – who knows? – maybe they look at other information and have their own hypotheses and interpretations that differ from your own. Or are the defensive comments by you quoted above a reflection of your own “individual and ethnic amour-propre?” Are you unable to take criticism without resorting to ad hominem?  

I know that the French have a reputation for being obnoxiously arrogant – related to brain structure, perhaps? – but, maybe, just maybe, your own interpretations and hypotheses are not correct, not reflections of science and reality, and, maybe, just maybe, the opinions of others are not merely “individual and ethnic amour-propre” attempting to avoid your hard truths. Maybe the comments made by others have some degree of validity on their own merits.

Wednesday in Der News

In der news.

This may be the best speech Taylor has ever given (albeit it was not given directly to his intended audience). I urge readers of this blog to spread it around. Taylor has all the makings of a born politician (and I’m praising here, not being sarcastic) and should have run for office – or do so in the future. Despite my areas of disagreement with Amren, I would support such a candidacy.

By the way, if Amren concentrated more on things like this, my areas of disagreement would be minimal.  This is what we need more of, not Asian-worshipping HBD, cheap-shot attacks against White ethnics, and giving a forum to vermin like Hart.

Yes, indeed, let’s have a “hearing” on “White nationalism” in which no White nationalists are invited and, indeed, no persons of European ancestry are even invited to speak.  And we observe a Black woman representing the Right. I mean – can the clownshow of America get any more ludicrous?  And it’s another fail for Der Movement, whose decades of utter failure have led us to this junction of powerlessness, despair, and complete defeat.  Speaking of which…

Pathetic Greg Johnson response to Common Sense Counselor:

CounterCurrentsTV
2 hours ago
One of my readers asked me to reply to this. Basically, I heard someone thinking out loud about my talk and wending his way to the conclusion that no, we should not focus on education as opposed to violence. Instead, he stands for something completely different, namely educating people about just how bad things are for white people — while warning them not to do anything violent. I guess because he is assuming that, no matter how bad things are, we have time to sort them out without violence. Sorry, but I don’t see any fundamental difference between what he said and what I said. I was just a lot clearer. My strong impression is that this guy only half listened to my talk and concluded that I said some very bad things because he has an ax to grind against me. Oh well, I guess I just need to work a little harder.

Wrong (as usual) and self-serving (as usual). I see a huge fundamental difference. CSC is suggesting we be ice-cold honest about the desperate situation we are in, not assert that “yes, things seem a bit bad now, but we are going to win,” always the victory psychosis, always a refusal to face up to “movement” disasters (except when one can blame Spencer and/or Friberg), and always with the tin cup out for panhandling without any actual victories or accomplishments to show for it. CSC is also very clearly calling for action that goes beyond education but falls short of violence – whether I agree with his suggestions or not is a discussion for another day (e.g., rallies and so forth – but boycotts I do agree with), but clearly he’s calling for things apart from folks just posting web articles and selling books and begging for money. I think some folks need to “work a little harder” on their auditory comprehension skills.

It is too bad that CSC answered Johnson in the comments section in a groveling fashion, instead of doing the proper thing, which would be to answer him, directly, in writing, with the same critical force as was used in the original video.  He “doesn’t have an axe to grind” – after essentially stating that Johnson was not fit to be a WN leader.  He also implied that WN “leaders” (like Johnson) sugarcoat reality for their “business model” (rattling the tin cup and selling books).  Which is it?  Is this CSC just too polite?  Does he lack the inner conviction of his beliefs so as to effectively respond when directly challenged by those “leaders” he criticizes?

And, CSC should do a video about the psychological defects and deficiencies behind the repeated Man on White Horse Syndrome humiliations, most recently represented by the Yang Gang fiasco.

I would like to correct any misunderstandings about this post. Without seeing the paper, we cannot say anything about admixture. The paper may very well show admixture in the samples; at this point, we do not know. My point simply is that the fact of changing centroids in and of itself says nothing about admixture. The change could be from admixture, or it could be simply from addition of samples from different ethnies.  You can get gray by mixing white and black paint, or you can get gray be averaging out the colors of separate and distinct cans of white and black paint.  Changing centroids due to admixture would have to be demonstrated by showing that individual samples are admixed, simply averaging the genetics of different unmixed samples is not admixture. Again, at this point, we do not know which of these two possibilities (or a perhaps a bit of both possibilities combined) is correct.  We cannot assume one possibility or the other bases solely on the changing centroids alone.  We not only have to wait for this particular paper, but also to see whether other research groups examine the same samples or, other, similar samples,and generate similar, or different, results..  

I will also note that I have always been agnostic about what the racial provenance of ancient peoples was. I have maintained that the only way to really know is to directly assay ancient remains for their autosomal genetics (and hope those samples are representative of the relevant peoples), and this has heretofore not been done. True, I have always been skeptical about the “movement” narrative, for reasons I have written about over the years, but this has always been a cautious, prudent skepticism, and not any definitive belief. I have always thought that the “evidence” used in the debates has been absurd – “eyeballing” statues, tendentious readings of ancient texts, the work of Frank, etc. .Further, my view was and still is that we need to concentrate on the racial situation today, and in the future, not thousands of years in the past. It was people like Kemp and Pierce and their supporters who were the ones who started the whole acrimonious argument to begin with

An appetizer for the upcoming Roman study:

Results suggest that only 7% of individuals buried at Vagnari were born elsewhere and migrated to Vagnari, while the remaining individuals were either local to Vagnari (58%), or from the southern Italian peninsula (34%). Our results are consistent with the suggestion that Roman Imperial lower‐class populations in southern Italy sustained their numbers through local reproduction measures, and not through large‐scale immigration from outside the Italian peninsula.

Kemp weeps.

Want to read something that shows you where feminist man-hating is heading?  Read Jack Vance’s City of the Chasch in Planet of Adventure, in particular the section on “The Seminary of the Female Mystery.”  Vance being prescient once again – better than the idiot Tolkien and his juvenile fantasies about “orcs.”  By the way, the good guys win in the Vance story, as the men revolt and destroy the Seminary and kill the Priestesses.  Unfortunately, the catalyst for that was a bit of White Knighting, but you can’t have everything.

Roissy:

Trump recently fired Scandicuck DHS secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, because the border had become a slip n’ slide for hundreds of thousands of Central Americans under her watch. Even the enemy media noticed and had to act as if they didn’t report just a few weeks ago that there wasn’t a national emergency at the border.
Trump also did a 180 on legal immigration, recently stating that America “was full” and didn’t need more immigrants, contradicting the enthusiasm for legal immigration he displayed in his SOTU address.
Word has it Stephen Miller (PBU that most righteous and based of specials) is taking over all immigration related policy matters in Trump’s administration.
What gives? Is this more hot air from Trump? Did he get a fright from internal polling? Is he an amnesiac? Is he too lazy to remember his policy proposals from one week to the next and just wants to ride a wave of feelz on whatever banal thought enters his mind? Did Ivanka go on vacation? Did Jared? Did the maturing Barron give his dad a suddenly judgmental gaze and a warning about his legacy? Did Melania finally stop crying over separated beanlets and show Donald the sharp edge of her Outer Hajnal soul?
Did Trump catch an earful from…us? Does vanity preclude me from wondering if dissidents to the prevailing orthodoxy, threatening to abandon Trump for his MAGA betrayals, pulled President Trump back to the essence of Campaign Trump?

No, Roissy, no. It’s like this – Trump is a lazy, stupid, imbecilic, vulgar buffoon, who, literally, believes and promotes whatever was the latest idea whispered in his ear. Before the State of the Union, Jew Kushner and converted Jew Ivanka were doing the whispering, more recently, Jew Miller has been whispering.  Obviously, one has to be either an ethnic Jew, or a converted Jew family member, to be allowed near Trump’s hairy orange ear.  Weasel-faced goys like you (or mick Bannon) are not allowed.

And as regard the moronic HBD Cunt Hajnal crap turds like you continue to peddle, you can only hope that you had an “Outer Hajnal” ethnocentric White as US President, instead of the retarded bloated fat cuck shitheel currently occupying the White House.

Let’s not be too hard on the Swedes.  They wuz Romans, after all.  No, wait…

Reparations for White Americans, Etc.

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Putting aside all the proximate issues of the costs of Colored crime, destruction of the cities, social welfare handouts, affirmative action, and the overall dispossession of Whites – which alone would be sufficient to guarantee White Americans huge reparations – there is a genetic, biological, EGI-based reparations imperative, as outlined here.

Genocide is worth reparations, is it not?  Genetic replacement is worth reparations, the lost child equivalents of EGI is definitely worth reparations. 

Reparations for White Americans.  Needed now more than ever.  Cash or check?

Tulsi Coconut – Princess of Negro Reparations, and her admirers.  And again.  And again.

“Our country is full.”  Yet is he on record saying he wants large amounts of more “legal” immigration.  Can Congress please impeach this buffoon, and vote to remove him from office?  Is it possible that all of the fat from the fast food he eats is clogging the arteries bringing blood to that underused spongy (small) mass that passes for his “brain?”

Remember that the great and good Desmond Jones claimed that Italy is, and shall remain, completely homogeneous to the end of time, forever and ever, amen.  Read this.

Said Mechaout, 27, born in Morocco but a naturalised Italian citizen, confessed to the killing, which occurred on the banks of the river Po in Turin on February 23rd, claiming he had purposely been waiting to kill a white Italian near his own age, Il Giornale reports.
“I hit a white, based on the obvious fact that a young Italian would have caused a sensation,” he allegedly told police. “I looked at him and I was sure he was Italian…

The wonderful racial theorists of Der Movement have told us that Italians and Moroccans are racially identical “Mediterraneans.” Interesting that Moroccans themselves do not believe that, and of course population genetics does not support that view either.  But, hey, the racial theorists are right because, well, they say so, and who can ever possibly argue against that?

Amren podcast.  The part about racial envy is true, but long time readers of this blog have read it all before.  See this from June 2015, which, by the way, was not the first time I had discussed that issue.  You’ll always get the breaking news and ideas here at EGI Notes first.

He’s better than Trump.

By the way, here is EGI Notes on October 5 2016:

For these reasons, I endorse Trump, even though I personally believe he is lazy and ignorant buffoon, an idiot with Jewish family connections, unread and unprepared, not very bright, hysterically undisciplined, a race cuck to the Negro – it is not Trump’s supporters who are the “basket of deplorables,” it is instead Trump’s myriad personal flaws that instead constitute the basket. But remember what Yockey said about de Gaulle: Europe may be saved by an idiot. Similarly, America may be put on a better path – a path of despair, division, misery, hatred, and multicultural untenability – by the idiot Trump.
My endorsement is made more difficult by the pitiful homoerotic pro-Trump hysteria in Der Movement. “Activists” – always eager for a “man on White horse” savior quick fix – have gravitated toward Trump (having abandoned Putin for the time being), and, also, the quota queens see in Trump a reflection of themselves.

From July 2016:

What’s Der Movement going to do if and when Der Touchback publicly backpedals like a clown on a unicycle? 
What if he is elected and reneges on his promises?

Well now we know. They’ll pretend they never worshipped the man in a paroxysm of homoerotic sweaty fervor, and they’ll mutter “Javanka” and “I told you so.” Der Movement is full of the most outrageous gaslighting liars possible.  The only person who has the right to say “I told you so” is yours truly, the crazy and bitter swarthoid, that gesticulating Negroid, Ted Sallis. 

The fetishists on Counter-Currents assert that Italy is merely a “geographic expression.”  That tired old canard again.  The genetic evidence shows that Italians from different parts of that country have reasonably similar ancestry proportions, with the expected north-to-south clinal differences in gene frequencies matching the “genes mirror geography” paradigm.  There are no large, abrupt differences, just a shallow, expected cline.

Is Germany a geographic expression?  We’re not allowed to say that. It’s not in the “script.”

Peas in a Pod: The Mendacious Left and the Retarded Right

Tweedledee and Tweedledumber.

What should the Left’s response be? In this case, the opposite of one-off theatrical actions and Instagram-able protests: a long-haul, multiracial, grassroots effort to educate the country on the profound connections between race and class (and the connections of both to gender).

You’ve been doing that for the last 50 years.  And that’s been going on in an intense manner – constant non-stop leftist propaganda – for at least the last 20 of those years.  It is obviously not working, is it?

If we are to learn anything from the eruption of fascist, White supremacist…

Anyone who uses the term “White supremacist” to describe White nationalists/White separatists is a low-character, fundamentally dishonest, piece of filthy scum.  Why should anyone listen to what else you have to say?

…organizing on both sides of the Atlantic, it should be that economic crisis and class conflict can accrue to the benefit of the Right as easily as the Left.

No worries.  The Far Right is so inept, the Left will likely win by default.  But they’ll lose by winning, because instead of creating a Utopia, a Paradise, a Heaven, they will instead create a Dystopian Nightmare Hell.

It should be that, as labor historian Jefferson Cowie recently put it, “real world” working-class politics in America “is a messy stew of populist, communitarian, reactionary, progressive, racist, patriarchal, and nativist ingredients.”

Then those ingredients are normal to human nature?  No worries, once again, because your own ethny, and of course your colored pets, are very intense on ethnocentric behavioral traits, while Whites are relatively weaker.

It should be that no group or class in America is inherently progressive, and no division lifted above others as essential.

Really?  The entire modern Left is defined by hostility toward Whites, particularly White men. Does class even matter anymore?  Does anyone believe that the Left cares more about some dirt poor White man from West Virginia than it does about a wealthy Negress celebrity from California?  Who’s kidding who?

Candid, self-supporting but nonjudgmental solidarity…

Candid?  The Left?  Nonjudgmental…including toward White men and Whites in general?  What fantasyland is this delusional (or mendacious) imbecile living in?

…is the only way forward: a true integration of issues (gender, race, class, sexuality, and others) with multi-issue education. A fight that targets systems, not “elites” who can turn into amorphous scapegoats, and radical coalition-building that combines assertiveness and humility are needed. It’s a daunting task, but nothing less is required.

The Left has nothing to offer Whites, particularly White men.  The existential meaning of the modern Left – what Sailer correctly terms “the coalition of the fringes” – is hatred of Whites, particularly White men. The targets of the Left’s hatred want no part of “racial coalition-building” with the people who despise them, and hardcore leftists do not want to build “coalitions” with White men. You’d think that Trump’s victory would have resulted in some honest soul-searching by the Left, but, no. They just doubled down on their hate. Whites have had enough of “multi-issue education” that ends up being a cult-like Orwellian “two minute hate” (lasting forever in actuality) against Whites. The Left is over-brimming with “assertiveness” and knows nothing about “humility” (your role model, AOC “I’m the boss,” can instruct you on that score).

You had your chance at “coalition-building” and muffed it, because the only coalition you really want is one that disenfranchises White interests. Whites as a race may be dumb cucks, but they’re not that dumb. It may be too late for Whites; it certainly is too late for any peaceful, aracial solution to the problems that have caused the pathetic examples of Far Right nitwitery that the author is so (hysterically) concerned about.

The Right:

Read this.  Still think that there is not an underlying agenda to marry racial activism with Judeophilia and Asiaphilia?  It would seem like reality is converging on Sallisian “paranoia.”

Yes, GDP is not everything. Racial homogeneity counts too.

But they’ll be giving you the UBI, don’t worry at all about it. And don’t think that they don’t equate “hate speech” with “terrorism.” The chickens come home to roost, decades of “movement” failure with zero representation in any of the halls of power means White advocates can be targeted for the most flimsy of reasons.


So much winning!  Sallis right again – Trump was always a fraud.


See here.  Note “based Austria” is part of the Far Left System.  As regards Trump:

President Donald Trump bears heavily responsibility for all this. While the president continues to enjoy stalwart support from his voters, the White House has shown the most abject cowardice in defending its own personnel. Speechwriter Darren Beattie was thrown aside the minute CNN complained. Thus staffer Taylor Weyeneth was also purged, along with others, when JournoFa demanded it.
For all Trump’s bluster against the “fake news,” journalists have far more power over Trump Administration personnel than the president himself. This feeds the beast of Political Correctness and emboldens journalists to seek more scalps.
As Jared Taylor said in a powerful video taped before his trip, the president has done nothing to stop the deplatforming and censoring of his supporters.
Trump even seems to have abandoned his fight for the white working class, a group he no longer even mentions (unlike Andrew Yang.) Instead, he makes tiresome boasts about low black and Hispanic unemployment. [Stop bragging about black and Hispanic unemployment rates, by John Crisp, VC Star, February 24, 2019] Winning issues like Official English are simply ignored, as is the president’s immigration platform. Only the most self-interested shill or brain-dead Conservative Inc. huckster could be surprised that Bernie Sanders now holds a commanding lead over President Trump in Pennsylvania. [Poll: Biden, Sanders hold double-digit lead on Trump in Pennsylvania, by John Bowden, The Hill, March 29, 2019].

Time for Roissy to post a gif of Trump strutting like Vince McMahon.  After all, we must know our priorities.  Note the bit about Sanders’ support in Pennsylvania. Is that due to all dem dere Amish switching sides, Roissy?  More accurately – Trump won Pennsylvania because of White ethnic working class Reagan Democrats, who are drifting away from the GOP now that Der Trumpening has been unmasked as a Neocon fraud.


And, again, the “movement’s” humiliation with the collapse of the Trump narrative should have led them to a period of introspection and prudent restraint regarding mainstream politics. Instead, they’ve been lurching around like  a bunch of seasick drunken retardates, first with a brief fling with Tulsi Coconut and know with their newest man-crush on Andy Eggroll. They’re pathetic.

More extreme vetting no doubt.  Where’s Patrik Hermansson when you need him?

In Der News

More odds and ends.

Absolutely, atrociously disgusting.  The problem is that the Quota Queens not only discredit and embarrass themselves.  Their pathetically humiliating and moronic stupidity smears all WNs by unfortunate association in the public mind.

Now let us all sit back and watch this latest Man on White Horse Syndrome debacle unfold…for the umpteenth time.

Once again, EGI Notes will be a bastion of sanity among a sea of “movement” madness. Just as this site rode the waves of the Trump hysteria, and coasted with a bemused eye through the Alt Right fever, so shall we all get though the Yang Gang Bang.

Understanding the human history of Amren 2006.

On the one hand, this is generally interesting and informative (but reflecting the author’s own biases).  But – he talks about himself?  And in a serious, non-ironic manner?*  Anyway, I’ve written about this Liddell before – just another typical “movement” ethnic fetishist.  And – who knows? – maybe “living in Japan” should be reserved for individuals of Japanese ethnicity? That would affirmatively be the “Right” thing to do, eh?

Indeed, perhaps Liddell should leave the great and good Japanese people alone to develop according to their own inner imperative.  For example, look here for an example of how the people of Nagasaki recovered from the atomic bombing to develop a scientific, architectural, and cultural artifact that the West can only dream of matching. Western Man stands in humble awe at that Oriental magnificence.

Have you ever noticed that so many of these ethnonationalist, ethnic fetishist, Alt Right, Alt Lite, and national conservative types like living in other people’s countries?  One fellow lives in Japan.  Another in Georgia.  Two in in Hungary.  One in Romania and another in Italy. None of these are of the ethnic origins indigenous to the nations in which they live, but they are all ethnonationalists, you see. The ones who live in Romania and Italy critique the nations in which they live and then take native women as their wives.  Incredible.  This is not ethnonationalism. It is ethnoimperialism.  All these racial aristocrats will live where they damn please, you see, and do whatever they want, after all, what are the dumb wogs going to do about it? 

Hey!  According to the great and good Desmond Jones, the White race is a “twentieth century Jewish construct.”

During the debates, congressmen sometimes used the word “European” rather than “white,” but it is clear that there was unanimity on this point: the United States was to be exclusively for white people.

So, late 18th century America: European = White.  The fetishists shown to be fundamentally dishonest, once again.

The metamorphosis into a neocon shill is approaching completion.

All of this material to work with, all of this White dissatisfaction, angst, and fear for the future, and all the Quota Queens can give us is “let’s support Chinaman Yang’s efforts to defuse White anger.”  They’re pathetic.

Roissy and Mangan weep bitter low-carb tears.

So much winning!  Black Nationalism of course will still be allowed, as per the original article.  Note that the decision was made in consultation with anti-White “experts” with White nationalists not being allowed to explain their position.

Anyone who argues that White Nationalism and White Separatism are the same as “White Supremacy” is so fundamentally dishonest they should be considered as peddling the equivalence of sociopolitical malpractice.  And by censoring political expression – and only from the pro-White side – they are virtually guaranteeing that more violence will occur. That’s the ultimate objective I suppose, so it can be used to justify more repression.

An informational note to regular readers: the site is on both Blogspot and WordPress, in case you have a preference for a format, or a problem with one of the sites:

*Obviously my own references to the crazy and bitter no good Ted Sallis are sarcastic and ironic.